There is no difference not understanding nor accepting the vast body of scientific research indicating anthropogenic climate change, which is not disputed by any scientific organisation relating to the field (the dispute being the extent rather than the cause), than there is denying the theory of evolution (which, on reflection, is something many people not accepting climate change probably would deny as well).
There is a difference between scepticism and stupidity.
Not really a one sided debate is it?, Huhne is killing people & industry with green taxes based on a non scientific theory, the only reason we lead on certain things Mr Huhne is because other countries know that what we lead in are no fecking use, Do us all a favour Huhne & piss off you fuck nugget, climate change is a load of bollocks & you know it.
These policies make no sence there is so much oil and gas out there. only the futures market speculators are pushing up the price of oil. easy to regulate against. oil and gas are plentyfull but reciently we are seeing bubbles in fule prices. if we try to implement green policies it will break western economies and benefit the third world through carbon trading, which is a UN policy. Growing crops to replace oil and gas is now causing hyperinflation in food prices accross the world.
carbon dioxide = 0.3% it can multiply by 4 times without any issues other then crops growing faster, quicker and healthier, plants optimum co2 is around 1500ppm, currently its around 250ppm which means that at some stage it was much higher, its another scam.....if co2 is a pollutant then humans are toxic, thats what they want you to believe, its getting crazee!!
The science supporting the next (inevitable) Ice Age is much better than the science supporting man-made global warming. Since a kilometre of ice sheet over London is infinitely more damaging than the risk of a warm winter or two, shouldn't we be trying to save ourselves by polluting with gay abandon?
Bury carbons while a new coalplant is opened every month in China and when the USA is whiping its ass with climate rules?
And 'energy' (electricity) isnt the main issue anyway, energy has many alternatives allready today.
Fuel for transport is the real question wich doesnt have any true alternative while that is the treu lifeline to any economy and uses by far the greatest part of the fossile fuels.
There is no difference not understanding nor accepting the vast body of scientific research indicating anthropogenic climate change, which is not disputed by any scientific organisation relating to the field (the dispute being the extent rather than the cause), than there is denying the theory of evolution (which, on reflection, is something many people not accepting climate change probably would deny as well).
There is a difference between scepticism and stupidity.
LucidCatnap 1 month ago
Green Energy means use less energy and live less.
MrApplewine 2 months ago
We need more perpetual motion machines like renewable energy!
MrApplewine 2 months ago
Not really a one sided debate is it?, Huhne is killing people & industry with green taxes based on a non scientific theory, the only reason we lead on certain things Mr Huhne is because other countries know that what we lead in are no fecking use, Do us all a favour Huhne & piss off you fuck nugget, climate change is a load of bollocks & you know it.
no1froggy 5 months ago
These policies make no sence there is so much oil and gas out there. only the futures market speculators are pushing up the price of oil. easy to regulate against. oil and gas are plentyfull but reciently we are seeing bubbles in fule prices. if we try to implement green policies it will break western economies and benefit the third world through carbon trading, which is a UN policy. Growing crops to replace oil and gas is now causing hyperinflation in food prices accross the world.
jjtruman 1 year ago
carbon dioxide = 0.3% it can multiply by 4 times without any issues other then crops growing faster, quicker and healthier, plants optimum co2 is around 1500ppm, currently its around 250ppm which means that at some stage it was much higher, its another scam.....if co2 is a pollutant then humans are toxic, thats what they want you to believe, its getting crazee!!
dikkydoo1 1 year ago
The science supporting the next (inevitable) Ice Age is much better than the science supporting man-made global warming. Since a kilometre of ice sheet over London is infinitely more damaging than the risk of a warm winter or two, shouldn't we be trying to save ourselves by polluting with gay abandon?
lol
0muffins0 1 year ago
Bury carbons while a new coalplant is opened every month in China and when the USA is whiping its ass with climate rules?
And 'energy' (electricity) isnt the main issue anyway, energy has many alternatives allready today.
Fuel for transport is the real question wich doesnt have any true alternative while that is the treu lifeline to any economy and uses by far the greatest part of the fossile fuels.
Clausewitzz 1 year ago
these ppl r stupid ass's and why r they not bring up italy and they prefected cold fusion we have more then enough water
lastpoet1 1 year ago