Added: 3 years ago
From: earlymus
Views: 2,556
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I disagree regarding the quality of this harpsichord by Keith Hill ... it has a wonderful sound.

  • Dear Robert,You seem to be more in harmony with the state of mind for this piece than you were with the other Duphly Rondeau.Also your timing is very dimensional and satisfying for my tastes.I would have like some more articulative variance in the variations but you seem hear this in a much more sober and pious way than I do.

  • On the other hand...While the instrument works pretty well here,but it is a far cry from any Taskin that I have heard.This instrument

    is objective,universalist,absolut­e,formal,

    and winter chrystalline while Taskin's aesthetic was subjective,intimate,democratic­,

    libertine,and full of warm earthy summer solstice

  • Finally...It's interesting and a bit confounding to me to hear all the absolutist piety that you thrust onto this piece in your approach to it,as neither this piece or you personally has this element in it.Whence does this conditioning arise and why is it important to thrust it onto this rhetoric?

  • again-lovely playing...any relation between the two of you?

  • Beautiful playing-who made the instrument?

  • The harpsichord is by Keith Hill (Manchester, MI), 2003, after Pascal Taskin (Paris, 1769)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more