Wait a minute, one video said that turning a circle inside out was impossible. But here, a torus certaintly is similar, and yet it's turning inside out without any "3-D" rotations!
"Am I supposed to believe that you can turn this circle inside out, but not that other circle?"
The difference is that the torus has a 3d part that allows one small piece to be turned inside out, so the rest follows easily. Just watch the video again, and you can see the difference.
A circle is infinitely flat, so it has no 3d part. It is also infinitely thin, because it is essentially a line segment that is connected to itself at both ends. A line has no volume or ares, so neither does the (circumference) of a circle.
The middle of a circle is not what is being considered. ONLY the edge.
It's really cool when it finally clicks in your mind, though! : )
amazing concept when applied to physics and dynamics of the structure of our spacetime vacuum. BUT I would like to note the masonic symbolism in the background animation . lol.. seriously tho. that's not an accident.
@solidus667 Assume that the material can pass through itself. Another assumption made is that the material cannot withstand creasing, so any folds destroys it.
Wait a minute, one video said that turning a circle inside out was impossible. But here, a torus certaintly is similar, and yet it's turning inside out without any "3-D" rotations!
"Am I supposed to believe that you can turn this circle inside out, but not that other circle?"
BRyanS72 6 months ago
@BRyanS72
The difference is that the torus has a 3d part that allows one small piece to be turned inside out, so the rest follows easily. Just watch the video again, and you can see the difference.
Buggy793 5 months ago
@Buggy793 Is the 3-D part like the thickness of it? because I though that a circle could have thickness also.
BRyanS72 5 months ago
@BRyanS72
A circle is infinitely flat, so it has no 3d part. It is also infinitely thin, because it is essentially a line segment that is connected to itself at both ends. A line has no volume or ares, so neither does the (circumference) of a circle.
The middle of a circle is not what is being considered. ONLY the edge.
It's really cool when it finally clicks in your mind, though! : )
Buggy793 5 months ago
@BRyanS72 Well, there are moments where depth is needed to turn the torus inside out.
godwin972 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
BRyanS72 6 months ago
amazing concept when applied to physics and dynamics of the structure of our spacetime vacuum. BUT I would like to note the masonic symbolism in the background animation . lol.. seriously tho. that's not an accident.
julianportis1 6 months ago
Great work, very clear!
jackvanwijk 1 year ago
Whet
Andrewvw100 1 year ago
@solidus667 Assume that the material can pass through itself. Another assumption made is that the material cannot withstand creasing, so any folds destroys it.
nfwu 1 year ago
An excellent solution can you do it across the equatorial plane using the same principle?
pootnikalexander 1 year ago
I see Truncated time also will also seek stability within the appropriate geometry.
gravitymindofgod 2 years ago
Very impressive!
CUB3FR34K 2 years ago 8
that makes perfect sense actually. good vid!
YoeriYoeri 2 years ago 5
beautiful!
dragoo994 2 years ago
nice
wvb93 2 years ago
coolio
karl0bar 3 years ago
Oh, whoa
natenaterson 3 years ago
da fuck?
TheIndigestableSkeet 3 years ago
Impressive
BlazeReap2 3 years ago
weird dude
pretty Mathematical
absulitcr 3 years ago