There is a reason why the Mark VIII was the last in its line. It was an ugly failure and it deterred a lot of Lincolns 2 door audience because it was to sporty and not enough Lincoln. It also didnt win over much of a sportier audience either. Lincoln either had to try and bring back the 2 door Lincoln audience or take an even greater risk of going further into the luxury sport theme. Neither was worth the risk and instead came the underdeveloped Lincoln LS, a 4 door sporty Lincoln with issues.
@RetroGamingGuide I got a 7 for my first car and about 2 years ago I got an 8, before I got my 8 I was saying the same thing you are with hating the 8s look... however after a week of having it I absolutely loved how it looks, it really does grow on you plus it turns 10x more heads than my 7 does, the 7 has lost its style to me now. I still love my 7 but the 8 is at least twice as nice basically in every way. I still split my driving between the two cars, but I honestly like the 8 more.
...I own an LSC and yours looks rather slow, like mine before I fixed some issues, bro. Not dissin you for fun or fame, I'm lookin like, man...But Honda still cant beat that!! haha I smoked MANY "imports" with my LSC as a junker, lol
wich is easier 2 mod the 5.0 or the 4.6 i wanna switch from a 96 impala ss 2 another sleeper that ppl wont take seriously and how do the engines and trans hold up
I agree that a Mark VII is slower, I own one. It is in very good condition and I would think it is better than average mechanically. As for low 16's yes but I honestly cannot think it would run in the high 15's, not in a stock unit. I have run 16.27 with 1/4 tank gas and no junk in the car and the air filter removed. About 2th's slower with air filter in, and no it's not plugged with dirt. I would like to buy a Mark VIII but they are fairly rare where I live.
my friend just got an 88 mark7 LSC for $2700, 70k miles decent paint pretty nice. he wants to resell it do you think he could get more? we were crusing 80 on freeway and he punched it, and it just wanted to break the needle and keep going, my civic could still beat it all day tho lol.
oh i forgot to say that the lincoln mark viii is about the same wieght as the mark vii just 100 lighters which does not increase the acceleration just the mgp by 3 miles
you hit 60 mph and it will hold it into second gear which you can then near redline againe and put it back into drive as a third gear. when your then redlining third, put it into overdrive and that will be the forth gear which isnt to great but still, you can do prob almost 140mph. I would recomend atleast exhaust and intake for this bacause why do it threw straws. struggling for air and made for fuel economy. Hot Rod Lincolns 3.23 8.8
i had 2 lincoln mark 7's and if you shift it right, it will go alot faster. There transmissions were set up to not redline at all and to shift early. say if you were drag racing. hold the gas the whole time. pull you gear shifter into first. then when you start racing, when you get near the redline, push the shifter into drive. when it changes to second gear, pull it back into first when
I have an 88 Mark Vii Lsc and it will blow the wheels of that Lsc he was not Flowering it at all he had to be scared ive flowered mine and it gets up and goes and the speedometer has went under the dash and could only see half the needle. only modi
fication is straight pipes and in 88 is when the output was changed after that they did some restyling in the interior on the dash move the radio up and put the speedometer to show the right speed for a top output at 120 but can go faster.
You're an idiot the cars came with a trac loc not a posi you hillbilly piece of shit and yeah the mark8 s came with the. As well as about every other rwd ford car did with an 8.8 and you call bullshit on my car running a 15,20 I call bullshit on you knowing how to wipe your ass I got a shit ton of slips to prove it. And guess what my car has gone slot faster than 15,20
@j109264 actually NO mark VIII ever came with a trac loc rearend. They came with traction control, but were simply one wheel wonders. only came in 2 gear ratios, which were 3.07 on the base model and 3.27 on the LSC that started mid year 1995. I never said a factory mark viii had a posi rear end. mine does because i built it. along with about 300 other rearends when i worked at a Ford dealership. and tell me how 225hp and 3600lbs equals a 15.2 1/4 mile. explain that, now shut your cocksucker.
@granadojl i did it to my '92 LSC SE and it handles incredibly, the springs and struts alone costed me $900 but i ordered svt cobra coil springs and it corners like one
For this day in time that's slow for a car. There are a lot of V6 cars that are faster than that. My Aurora would walk all over a Mark VII. A Mark VIII is a better race.
What year is your friends 5.0??? they changed the output mid way through production... Plus, I doubt your friend's 4.0 can keep up with my 5.0 based block
His lsc is a '91. My cousin has a '97 lsc and he beat my Aurora by a half a car length. I don't think the stock VII LSC is gonna keep up with a VIII LSC.
BULLSHIT. the Mark VII's are not faster then the Mark VIII's. Mark VII's weight just as much and made 55 less horsepower then the Mark VIII. The 1992 LSC mark VII's ran low 16's and the occasional high 15. The Mark VIII's all run low 15's/ high 14's. SO how are the mark VII's faster????
so since my 89 Mark Vii came out with 225-235 hp, do you seriously think they went from that to 55 plus hp, there is no way even if you look back at all the 5.0's and years they never came out with over 265 hp and that was the mustangs. the Lincoln Mark Vii's where like an exact replica of mustangs from all of the production years, the only difference was that the mark vii was like 400-500 lbs heavier and rear end was geared lower
your markVII was a 225hp 5.0. the Mark VIII had a 4.6 DOHC 280HP engine. that is 55 more HP. need a calculator??? now go look up the base curb weights. they are damn near identical. now go look through archives of sites like motor trend etc. and you'll find that the mark VII's were 16sec cars. Mark VIII's run very low 15's STOCK. So the DOHC 4.6 the cobra guys love.. debuted in a Lincoln. 1993 first year mark VIII had that very engine. I've run several of the VII's and it wasn't pretty 4 them.
that search bar at the top of the screen... you see it??? now type in 1993 Mark VIII ad, then you'll see the Ford advertisement for the 1993 Mark VIII, and in there it talks about the 4.6 DOHC rated at 280 Horsepower and 280 Torque.
hey svtlincoln what are trying say ya the mark 8 did come with the 285 hp and 285 torque but the mark 7 came with 225 hp and 300 torque but ford did make a wrong estiamte it had acaully 250hp and 325 torque. i know because i'm working with ford at the head quators they wanted not to increase the insurance rates and have the buyer not to pay more for it than 1987 model year.
@MegaFordpower NO. the mark viii from 1993-1996 was rated at 280hp and 280lb ft of torque. i have the actual brochure that came with my 95 model. the LSC introduced mid year 95 was rated at 290hp and 290lb ft. and also if a vehicle is 100lbs lighter that DOES increase acceleration times. rule of thumb: 100lbs = 10hp. now do i really believe you work at headquarters?? i believe some one working at the top of Ford would be able to spell the words actually and quarter. not acaully & quator. wtf?
@svtlincoln actually my friend the brochure did say it had 290 hp and 290lb of torque but they did a retesting on all models that came with the 4.6 dohc 32 valve engines. because the 96-99 cobras had loss of power when the owner order it from the dealer. so ford had settle down with NSTA to back up on all their 4.6 dohc 32 valve engines like that are prone of intake designs. and just to let you know fords 5.0 has 300 pounds of torque and the 4.6 had 290 pounds of torque so 10lb less of the 5.0 .
@MegaFordpower whatever you're ignorant and full of bullshit. the mark viii is based at 280, and don't give me that recall bullshit. Did i mention i was a tech at lincoln? now take your lieing, no spelling ass on somewhere. BLOCKED!
@svtlincoln hey i must ask, since you worked at lincoln, what was the whole intech thing about, im a ford fan for life but it kinda sounds like they knocked of chevy's vortech and i dont like the thought of that
@dixitraditions77 It is just a name. Just like Triton on the truck engines. Some people think it was because of the revised intake on the 97-98's but the first intech badging showed up in 96 before the revised intake. Why ford decided to start calling them Intech, I don't know. Maybe they thought they needed a name, since caddy had "Northstar" which is also... just a name.
@svtlincoln oh ok, thank you for clearing that up for me, im 17 and im in an automotive technologies class at a tech center and i was raised around cars all my life my dad and papaws taught me everything i know and i can do most of it, i just rebuilt a 455 for a skylark, so i was was wondering how hard would it be to put a 5 speed in my mark vii
@svtlincoln i agree with you completely and i have a 92 mark vii special edition, but i do believe the mark vii look just a lil bit better, now if they had the 32 valve 4.6 intech motor like the mark viii they would be an all around better car except for cornering
@svtlincoln mark vii is only faster than the base markviii 93-94 but when the 95 mkviii lsc is faster because it has a buffer engine and better exhaust flow than the base.
@MegaFordpower the mark vii is NOT faster than a "base" 93-94 Mark VIII. Actually there was no "base" 93-94 Mark VIII, since the LSC wasn't an option until late in the 95 production year. A 1993 Mark VIII is a low 15sec car all day long. Once again, how is a low 15sec 1/4 mile slower than a high 15sec 1/4 mile? The LSC had the same damn engine as all the other Mark VIII's the only diff was a true dual exhaust worth a whopping 10hp, and 3.27 rear gear and they were only a tenth of sec faster.
@svtlincoln actually their was a base mark and that is the one that started 93-98 and i know that lsc came in 95 damn ass that what said last time i sent you . don't you know how to read bitch.
@MegaFordpower yes and you also claim a LSC has a diff cam, intake and blah blah blah and that's in 2sec faster. blah blah blah. do a lil research and quit makin shit up. 95 base Mark VIII made 280hp, the LSC made 290hp. that's it. end of story. STFU. and leave me the hell alone.
you aint kiddin...minor work is cheap, but if you got a lot of minor things to fix, it adds up haha. Ive put more money into the car than what i paid for it and still needs satuff done.. Actually the exhaust rusted n split a couple days ago so its loud as hell now haha
@revolutionday1 hahah I know right? I was getting on the highway in my '99 expy the other day and I pegged it, it just like got stuck at 4500 and I was like shift dammit!
There is a reason why the Mark VIII was the last in its line. It was an ugly failure and it deterred a lot of Lincolns 2 door audience because it was to sporty and not enough Lincoln. It also didnt win over much of a sportier audience either. Lincoln either had to try and bring back the 2 door Lincoln audience or take an even greater risk of going further into the luxury sport theme. Neither was worth the risk and instead came the underdeveloped Lincoln LS, a 4 door sporty Lincoln with issues.
Penisbaby101 5 months ago
@RetroGamingGuide I got a 7 for my first car and about 2 years ago I got an 8, before I got my 8 I was saying the same thing you are with hating the 8s look... however after a week of having it I absolutely loved how it looks, it really does grow on you plus it turns 10x more heads than my 7 does, the 7 has lost its style to me now. I still love my 7 but the 8 is at least twice as nice basically in every way. I still split my driving between the two cars, but I honestly like the 8 more.
H20MarkVIII 5 months ago
these are cool but my tbird would kill it
coltonwithano 6 months ago
...I own an LSC and yours looks rather slow, like mine before I fixed some issues, bro. Not dissin you for fun or fame, I'm lookin like, man...But Honda still cant beat that!! haha I smoked MANY "imports" with my LSC as a junker, lol
westworth327 6 months ago
wich is easier 2 mod the 5.0 or the 4.6 i wanna switch from a 96 impala ss 2 another sleeper that ppl wont take seriously and how do the engines and trans hold up
bergaflickal 11 months ago
I think your steering wheel's missing some parts. :P
humanparody12 11 months ago
I agree that a Mark VII is slower, I own one. It is in very good condition and I would think it is better than average mechanically. As for low 16's yes but I honestly cannot think it would run in the high 15's, not in a stock unit. I have run 16.27 with 1/4 tank gas and no junk in the car and the air filter removed. About 2th's slower with air filter in, and no it's not plugged with dirt. I would like to buy a Mark VIII but they are fairly rare where I live.
roadcracks 1 year ago
my friend just got an 88 mark7 LSC for $2700, 70k miles decent paint pretty nice. he wants to resell it do you think he could get more? we were crusing 80 on freeway and he punched it, and it just wanted to break the needle and keep going, my civic could still beat it all day tho lol.
702LTR450 1 year ago
anyone know some good cheapish mods for the lincoln 5.0 engine?
dmspit 1 year ago
@dmspit just get a 347 stroker from summit for $3000 and you'll have 350 flywheel hp
northeasteg6 1 year ago
oh i forgot to say that the lincoln mark viii is about the same wieght as the mark vii just 100 lighters which does not increase the acceleration just the mgp by 3 miles
MegaFordpower 2 years ago
Comment removed
MegaFordpower 2 years ago
What happened? Did a honda accord beat ur ass?
hechheche78 2 years ago
The MKVIII is when shit started getting that ugly generic look, I'll take another MKVII LSC and do some performance work anyday.
45Thunderbird 2 years ago
my mark 7 eats 8s for lunch . but it wouldnt stock
ptak2010 2 years ago
ya so learn ur shit mustang blows
Rgthuggin88 2 years ago
Comment removed
06699080 2 years ago
you hit 60 mph and it will hold it into second gear which you can then near redline againe and put it back into drive as a third gear. when your then redlining third, put it into overdrive and that will be the forth gear which isnt to great but still, you can do prob almost 140mph. I would recomend atleast exhaust and intake for this bacause why do it threw straws. struggling for air and made for fuel economy. Hot Rod Lincolns 3.23 8.8
06699080 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i had 2 lincoln mark 7's and if you shift it right, it will go alot faster. There transmissions were set up to not redline at all and to shift early. say if you were drag racing. hold the gas the whole time. pull you gear shifter into first. then when you start racing, when you get near the redline, push the shifter into drive. when it changes to second gear, pull it back into first when
06699080 2 years ago
Comment removed
06699080 2 years ago
wrong!!!!!! those sum-bitches would fly
goodoleboy2008 2 years ago
I have an 88 Mark Vii Lsc and it will blow the wheels of that Lsc he was not Flowering it at all he had to be scared ive flowered mine and it gets up and goes and the speedometer has went under the dash and could only see half the needle. only modi
Jake0122Force 2 years ago
fication is straight pipes and in 88 is when the output was changed after that they did some restyling in the interior on the dash move the radio up and put the speedometer to show the right speed for a top output at 120 but can go faster.
Jake0122Force 2 years ago
I'm very glad that you know how to flower your car, take pictures next time it's starting to bud
patentpending3939 2 years ago
your right. those cars would fly. Floor it from a standstill and you would leave 2 long positive traction marks behind you.
goodoleboy2008 2 years ago
not in a mark VIII you wouldn't. No mark viii left the factory with a posi rearend. EVER. wasn't even a dealer option.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
i dont think this is so either
YoungRand 2 years ago
You're an idiot the cars came with a trac loc not a posi you hillbilly piece of shit and yeah the mark8 s came with the. As well as about every other rwd ford car did with an 8.8 and you call bullshit on my car running a 15,20 I call bullshit on you knowing how to wipe your ass I got a shit ton of slips to prove it. And guess what my car has gone slot faster than 15,20
j109264 2 years ago
@j109264 actually NO mark VIII ever came with a trac loc rearend. They came with traction control, but were simply one wheel wonders. only came in 2 gear ratios, which were 3.07 on the base model and 3.27 on the LSC that started mid year 1995. I never said a factory mark viii had a posi rear end. mine does because i built it. along with about 300 other rearends when i worked at a Ford dealership. and tell me how 225hp and 3600lbs equals a 15.2 1/4 mile. explain that, now shut your cocksucker.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
@Jake0122Force i did the same thing in my 92 lsc se
dixitraditions77 1 year ago
I just bought a '90 LSC SE a few weeks ago, and I am going to convert to coil suspension in about a weeks or so.
granadojl 2 years ago
thats a good improvement over the stock airbags.
ChronoCrossKid 2 years ago
@granadojl i did it to my '92 LSC SE and it handles incredibly, the springs and struts alone costed me $900 but i ordered svt cobra coil springs and it corners like one
dixitraditions77 1 year ago
5k redline ??? hmm
spdkilzasoundsuck 3 years ago
most 5.0 cars had the 5k redline tachs.
AkLG5 2 years ago
5500 rpm for the HO's
ChronoCrossKid 2 years ago
5,900 on my 94 5.0
94STANG562 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Slow....
BALT1024 3 years ago
fuck u dats fast
spdkilzasoundsuck 3 years ago 2
For this day in time that's slow for a car. There are a lot of V6 cars that are faster than that. My Aurora would walk all over a Mark VII. A Mark VIII is a better race.
BALT1024 2 years ago
Kidding me? 5.0L V8...modern mustangs have that, best engine ford made....VERY fast even when its hauling the heavy weight of the car
Falcain 2 years ago
Don't the modern Mustangs have a 4.6? My friend has a Mark VII LSC and it can't keep up with my 4.0 Aurora.
BALT1024 2 years ago
What year is your friends 5.0??? they changed the output mid way through production... Plus, I doubt your friend's 4.0 can keep up with my 5.0 based block
granadojl 2 years ago 2
His lsc is a '91. My cousin has a '97 lsc and he beat my Aurora by a half a car length. I don't think the stock VII LSC is gonna keep up with a VIII LSC.
BALT1024 2 years ago
the mark VII were faster than the VIII
YoungRand 2 years ago
BULLSHIT. the Mark VII's are not faster then the Mark VIII's. Mark VII's weight just as much and made 55 less horsepower then the Mark VIII. The 1992 LSC mark VII's ran low 16's and the occasional high 15. The Mark VIII's all run low 15's/ high 14's. SO how are the mark VII's faster????
svtlincoln 2 years ago 5
so since my 89 Mark Vii came out with 225-235 hp, do you seriously think they went from that to 55 plus hp, there is no way even if you look back at all the 5.0's and years they never came out with over 265 hp and that was the mustangs. the Lincoln Mark Vii's where like an exact replica of mustangs from all of the production years, the only difference was that the mark vii was like 400-500 lbs heavier and rear end was geared lower
YoungRand 2 years ago
your markVII was a 225hp 5.0. the Mark VIII had a 4.6 DOHC 280HP engine. that is 55 more HP. need a calculator??? now go look up the base curb weights. they are damn near identical. now go look through archives of sites like motor trend etc. and you'll find that the mark VII's were 16sec cars. Mark VIII's run very low 15's STOCK. So the DOHC 4.6 the cobra guys love.. debuted in a Lincoln. 1993 first year mark VIII had that very engine. I've run several of the VII's and it wasn't pretty 4 them.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
ok whatever my man im not gonna argue with you, i just find it hard to believe that a 93 mark viii is rated with more hp that a 93 mustang
YoungRand 2 years ago
try Google.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
that search bar at the top of the screen... you see it??? now type in 1993 Mark VIII ad, then you'll see the Ford advertisement for the 1993 Mark VIII, and in there it talks about the 4.6 DOHC rated at 280 Horsepower and 280 Torque.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
hey svtlincoln what are trying say ya the mark 8 did come with the 285 hp and 285 torque but the mark 7 came with 225 hp and 300 torque but ford did make a wrong estiamte it had acaully 250hp and 325 torque. i know because i'm working with ford at the head quators they wanted not to increase the insurance rates and have the buyer not to pay more for it than 1987 model year.
MegaFordpower 2 years ago
@MegaFordpower NO. the mark viii from 1993-1996 was rated at 280hp and 280lb ft of torque. i have the actual brochure that came with my 95 model. the LSC introduced mid year 95 was rated at 290hp and 290lb ft. and also if a vehicle is 100lbs lighter that DOES increase acceleration times. rule of thumb: 100lbs = 10hp. now do i really believe you work at headquarters?? i believe some one working at the top of Ford would be able to spell the words actually and quarter. not acaully & quator. wtf?
svtlincoln 2 years ago
@svtlincoln actually my friend the brochure did say it had 290 hp and 290lb of torque but they did a retesting on all models that came with the 4.6 dohc 32 valve engines. because the 96-99 cobras had loss of power when the owner order it from the dealer. so ford had settle down with NSTA to back up on all their 4.6 dohc 32 valve engines like that are prone of intake designs. and just to let you know fords 5.0 has 300 pounds of torque and the 4.6 had 290 pounds of torque so 10lb less of the 5.0 .
MegaFordpower 2 years ago
@MegaFordpower whatever you're ignorant and full of bullshit. the mark viii is based at 280, and don't give me that recall bullshit. Did i mention i was a tech at lincoln? now take your lieing, no spelling ass on somewhere. BLOCKED!
svtlincoln 2 years ago
my stock 88 mark vii bb edition went 15.20... car and driver was wrong and you are as well..
j109264 2 years ago
@j109264 15.20 out of a 3600lb 225hp car. i smell BULLSHIT. and you're an idiot and a liar. now go away.
svtlincoln 2 years ago
@svtlincoln hey i must ask, since you worked at lincoln, what was the whole intech thing about, im a ford fan for life but it kinda sounds like they knocked of chevy's vortech and i dont like the thought of that
dixitraditions77 1 year ago
@dixitraditions77 It is just a name. Just like Triton on the truck engines. Some people think it was because of the revised intake on the 97-98's but the first intech badging showed up in 96 before the revised intake. Why ford decided to start calling them Intech, I don't know. Maybe they thought they needed a name, since caddy had "Northstar" which is also... just a name.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln oh ok, thank you for clearing that up for me, im 17 and im in an automotive technologies class at a tech center and i was raised around cars all my life my dad and papaws taught me everything i know and i can do most of it, i just rebuilt a 455 for a skylark, so i was was wondering how hard would it be to put a 5 speed in my mark vii
dixitraditions77 1 year ago
@svtlincoln i agree with you completely and i have a 92 mark vii special edition, but i do believe the mark vii look just a lil bit better, now if they had the 32 valve 4.6 intech motor like the mark viii they would be an all around better car except for cornering
dixitraditions77 1 year ago
@svtlincoln
Because the MKVIIs look nicer, therefore people are more willing to put performance parts in them.
45Thunderbird 1 year ago
@45Thunderbird Way to join a conversation a year later. Maybe go read the WHOLE thing and then try again.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln mark vii is only faster than the base markviii 93-94 but when the 95 mkviii lsc is faster because it has a buffer engine and better exhaust flow than the base.
MegaFordpower 1 year ago
@MegaFordpower the mark vii is NOT faster than a "base" 93-94 Mark VIII. Actually there was no "base" 93-94 Mark VIII, since the LSC wasn't an option until late in the 95 production year. A 1993 Mark VIII is a low 15sec car all day long. Once again, how is a low 15sec 1/4 mile slower than a high 15sec 1/4 mile? The LSC had the same damn engine as all the other Mark VIII's the only diff was a true dual exhaust worth a whopping 10hp, and 3.27 rear gear and they were only a tenth of sec faster.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln actually their was a base mark and that is the one that started 93-98 and i know that lsc came in 95 damn ass that what said last time i sent you . don't you know how to read bitch.
MegaFordpower 1 year ago
@MegaFordpower yes and you also claim a LSC has a diff cam, intake and blah blah blah and that's in 2sec faster. blah blah blah. do a lil research and quit makin shit up. 95 base Mark VIII made 280hp, the LSC made 290hp. that's it. end of story. STFU. and leave me the hell alone.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln
I fully agree! I own both. Don't get me wrong I love my Mark VII but damn the Mark VIII is on another level.
Just point the nose and it will haul ass (even when I don't want it to).
markVIIchick 11 months ago
Sweet! I had a mark 7 also...i miss it!
luvscats69 3 years ago
lol no horn cover or steering column cover...i got an 88 Mark VII BB edition myself...old as hell but still got some grunt left lol
ffgew22 3 years ago
yeah same here i got an 88 bb really nice car just needs alot of minor work. but hell payed 300 bucks for it and it runs.
sicandtwisted23 3 years ago
you aint kiddin...minor work is cheap, but if you got a lot of minor things to fix, it adds up haha. Ive put more money into the car than what i paid for it and still needs satuff done.. Actually the exhaust rusted n split a couple days ago so its loud as hell now haha
ffgew22 3 years ago
yeah but the best part about the mark 7 is most of its mechanical parts are the same as a tbird and tbird parts are cheap.
sicandtwisted23 3 years ago
Really? thats good to know bc I NEED parts lol mine needs some love after I bought it, going to fully restore it
Falcain 2 years ago
lol forget minor work air ride went out last month in mine its over $2,300 to have replaced.
sicandtwisted23 3 years ago
wtf... my 88 will smoke that one.. wtf did u do to it? Almost like you were afraid to FLOOR it...
theCSnoob 4 years ago
Was that floored? The trans is shifting at only 4K, shouldn't it shift at 5K?
OldsLSSL67 4 years ago
It's a FoMoCo. product. It'll shift when it wants to.
revolutionday1 4 years ago 7
@revolutionday1 hahah I know right? I was getting on the highway in my '99 expy the other day and I pegged it, it just like got stuck at 4500 and I was like shift dammit!
corvettels9 1 year ago