Added: 4 years ago
From: ninnzbinnz
Views: 202
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Poery, Mohammedanism and infidelity are the three greatest opponents of the Gospel. Allah = moon goddess.

  • Do you say... That the bible is right? The bible is just something that some old man came up with a couple of thousand years ago to make people believe in something... And it seems like he manages to make some ppl believe him...

  • holy crap its the transitional form between a shirt and a human.

    so to boil down your argument.

    credentials dont indicate a measure of understanding that surpasses that of a layman?

    you are aware that he violated one of the key parts of the scientific method. (foundational bias..when using the bible as a starting point)

  • you are aware as for key you are inocent until proven guilty at least in the non muslim countires. so prove the bible guilty of being wrong? see you cant and your friends cant and infact you follow your own religion cause you cant prove your faith but do follow it blindly

  • "so prove the bible guilty of being wrong?"

    prove you dont like getting spanked and having your hair pulled while getting pounded by a 50 year old man.

    wait you cant prove negatives .. but we can pretend that its possible and just assume that you do indeed like the above statement.

  • Which bible?

  • It appears the creationists repeating this whale-of-a-tale, (including the editors of Creation Ex Nihilo) either failed to check their facts or didn't want a good story to be ruined by the facts. In either case, none of these people apparently took the time and trouble to find out what the facts were before putting pen to paper. What they claim to be God's truth is nothing more than an urban folktale used to validate personal religious beliefs. (cont)

  • would you be so kind as to proove that these microscopic sea shells are not in the chalk? or that, snt.helens did not do as he said it did. funny you guys all talk. like i said to voice he should post his evidence. see he is a bigot but i dont need a peer review paper to prove that one. its self evident. just like many other certainties in life font need peer review paper

  • Russel (1976) took some liberty with the facts. First, the skeleton was not found in a vertical position, but was lying at an angle 50 to 40 degrees from horizontal. Finally, although at this angle, the whale skeleton lay parallel to the bedding of strata which at one time was the sea floor on which the dead whale fell after its death. These facts were confirmed with the people at the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History who excavated the whale.

  • yes thank you for the update. but in any case a whale disintergrates so quick there is nothing left of it in less then some weeks. now for fully fossilised whale to be preserved and that many of them in one location. thats the thickness of a whale worth of burial. that much dirt to cover an entire whale. but hang on i though it was mil of years to get it that thick? proof positive it can be weeks. and in that case it was.

  • Why are you "appearing" in a vlog and yet hide your identity? I find this behaviour rather odd.

  • well you can never be to carefull. especialy posting what i do and how i do it. never know when your neighbour may be a voiceof bloodshed sort of person watching your vid and decides to take care of business you know what im saying.

  • Is this thing ON??

  • dude go what the guy who im replying to just so you know what sort of person im dealing with. he is still going on about histsalactite. and yes veith is wright in saying the scientist were the first to propose this theory. veith never said when they said this. funny how this voiceoftruth hothead is so wrong

  • I have looked.. and listened. Voice is making a valid point as cats are undeniably and incontrovertibly obligate carnivores. Let me make my position clear. I am Atheist. I respect your beliefs but do not agree. Your belief in the "afterlife" simply devalues the one life we have.

  • yeh valid in his own head. i never posted them. and he just wants a fight. need i remind you of darwins mental condition through

    out his life? there is a word for that its called caracter assasination but whatch my evolution vids when i post them. you theory is screwed as many such fealines have been recorded as being fed on vegan diets. so yes double wrong. oh and i worked out that mans atitude in the first 2 seconds of his vid. if i was evolutionist i would say he is missing link

  • Your spelling and grammar is awful. I am inclined to avoid the 'Fundamental attributional error' and jump to conclusions. Therefore, I have no option but to request of you; is English your first language?

  • you funy man. it may aswell be but i failed it and typing close to the am hours with one eye opened doesnt help.

  • Many people learned in school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty- above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do not use the terms that way. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature.

  • yes it does the rock around a perfectly preserved whale cant be 1000 years old not even 10 years old even if it is horizontal. but must be under a month in formation. but ofcourse you can have you theory which now becomes a fable in that regard.

  • go for it voice of truth lets see what other stuff you gona say.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more