Hyman Brown, steel melts, NBC, 9/11, 19:51

[HurburBurbur]

Unbelievable, Hyman Brown being interviewed as a keyplayer in the Twin Tower constructions of which he wasn't even involved. Slim chance that he doesn't know he's being referred to as such, especially since he didn't set the record straight and continued posing in that manner. He should be subject to a criminal investigation with his bankaccount records checked.

[eamonearly]

Hyman Brown is a fraud and BS artist. He is not an architect or engineer or project engineer or 5th man in charge during the WTC build. HE LIES. THIS PROGRAM IS BS. If you do not believe it then look at HIS OWN RESUME. GO TO THIS LINK remove bracks [ ] []

[]colorado911visibility.[]org/­2009/05/26/%E2%80%9Cchief-engi­neer%E2%80%9D-hyman-brown-by-p­atrick-marks/[]

[Denierbud11]

I don't want info, I want to see the white paper -- you said there was a white paper. So, have you seen it?

[Denierbud11]

Oh yeah, cool, post a link to that white paper that cites 600 mph speed - love to see it.

[punxsutawneybarney]

@Denierbud11 For info on the 600 mph 707 design spec, see the book "City in the Sky", p. 131.

Hyman Brown was not the project engineer on the twin towers, but somewhere the news media got the idea that he was. Immediately after 9/11 the conventional wisdom was that the jet fuel had melted the steel. NBC, CNN, NOVA, and BBC all said so. For more about Mr. Brown and the other "experts" see my video:

The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers

[DJKineticX]

Hyman Brown wasnt the architect or the project engineer he was in LA during the construction of the towers getting his MBA.. see for your self at his resume

Something odd about it is that he says he graduated from CALState U but it wasnt a U until 1972.. So where actually was he during this time?

[pointblizzy]

at 1:22 he's lying. I saw an interview from the company who built the towers years ago..They specifically said "you could flay a plane into these things and you couldn't take em down" Ever since the 60's they been making sky scrapers airplane proof.

[Denierbud11]

@pointblizzy

buildings are not airplane proof

[punxsutawneybarney]

@Denierbud11 According to a 1964 white paper the buildings were designed to take an impact from a four-engine 707 traveling 600 mph. The 767s that hit the towers only had 2 engines and were traveling much slower than that. The engineer, John Skilling, told the Seattle Times in 1993 that the buildings could survive the fires from a plane crash.

[smujismuj]

Amazing, the corporate media reported all of this information without any investigation into much of it.

"Terrorist attack"...How did he know that for sure?

Also, Google "hyman brown fraud" and read the "wearechange" article.

[CogRobot]

"no one ever considered any types of forces like this" "structural steel is fireproofed to last between 1 & 2 hours, which it did, and then steel melts" "an airplane crash never entered anyone's mind"

All these statements are demonstrably false.

A fire never caused a steel framed high-rise to collapse. The temperatures were not high enough to melt steel. Even NIST make no such absurd claim. "The building were designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it" Frank A. DeMartini