lol. origins of species is just a theory. people who want to deny God will accept any theory. another point is that if humans evolved from the neanderthal man.. why do we still have chimps and gorillas and monkeys today?. Evolution doesn't make logical sense. I mean how can someones mutations of blood clots develop over time, it does not come in stages otherwise we would have bled to death. its like saying, i'll feel pain before i have developed brain cells to feel pain.
No, atheism has existed long before any idea of evolution. Example : Diderot. Atheists don't have a problem not having answers, we'd rather admit we don't know than pretend we do.
But evolution is scientific fact and if you don't accept it you belong in the same category as flat-earthists. There's no discution about this.
This video proves nothing, it's not science, those morons are not scientists, they do not understand science and this isn't a scientific journal.
Evoulution is a lie. This video proved it. Its based on the science at the 19th century it makes me feel sick. Monkeys can't transform into humans just like i phone 3 can't transform into i phone 4 and they both have a creator or can they exist by chance? Maybe if we waited 5000000000 years the i phone will be a train. Maybe why not? Athesists say that our religion is stupid. What about evoulution or should i say darwin's imagination. So stupid and childish.
@TheMultitube1 First off, evolution has nothing to do with atheism. Atheism is the lack of religion. Evolution is a scientific theory and a fact.
If you want to question science, first get a scientific education. Then all you have to do is publish the evidence against evolution in a scientific paper. But not a single person was able to do that in 150 years. It's because there's no evidence against evolution, whether you accept it or not.
@ivanlagrossemoule firstly if evoulution is WRONG so athesim is WRONG because without it they would have no answer to the origin of life. evoulution. secondly, i read darwins book but he based his ideas on some false incorrect scientfic knowldge that was there at the time. lastly, there is no real evidence for evolution. did you know why alot of people and scientists supported darwin's idea at that time because it went against the CHURCH not because its scientific value. this video proves it
@DonLeVisi I am educated.I am not against science at all I am just against some ideas of evolution. you have no right to tell me that I have an'' immaturely developed brain''. I am only against that apes evolved to humans. until now i did'nt see any solid proof for evolution. I can believe that that creatures can change but not to a different creature. if you research the theory of evolution you will see that every thing started basic then to complex.
@DonLeVisi but DNA doesn't work this way it only can lose information. please tell me why do you believe in evolution and correct me if I said anything wrong. thanks
science has its place in our society however science is not the substitute for a logical faith in a GOD that has given us the logical understanding of our own creation.Evolution only occurs within species of its own kind.
@DonLeVisi creation is much more logical that evolution.evolution has to have a starting point , the origin of species cannot survive without a creator, if you thin otherwise explain it to me.
Evolution is pushed by most scientists in a very bias way, one, to keep funds coming through, two, they are scared of accepting that a creator is most possible to exist, three, they will be out of a job and ignored, four, life would not be interesting anymore for them, five, they hate god, six, the scientific community is a cult like community, if one speaks of I.D the rest will turn their backs.
Science is moulded around the theory of ev. it can be done if you want it that way.
@hudfadz Reading your response, it would seem you are very biased against scientists.
Gravity is a theory. If a scientist states he has an alternate theory, he/she should provide compelling evidence to support it, else gravity is the accepted explanation. Would they be classed as a cult community for this...?
Your post makes a lot of assumptions, with no evidence to support them.
@DonLeVisi You're right, creation might not seem logical, that depends on the type of logical argument you use. Most sciences apply a 'deductive logical' argument. Creation is more logical than evolution in an 'inductive logical' argument. This type of logical arguments is commonly used in some geology studies (e.g. fieldwork) and in forensic and criminal investigation science where e.g. your finger print is LOGICALLY considered an evidence of your previous presence in the crime scene
@DiGa25 Inductive reasoning can't even be applied correctly to 'creationism'.
There is no valid evidence for creationism to even induce the idea of creationism from.
Someone can not say, "life as we know it, is evidence for creationism." That isn't inductive reasoning; that is taking a huge leap of faith from A to Z with a complete absence in determining B,C,D,.....W,X,Y,
lol. origins of species is just a theory. people who want to deny God will accept any theory. another point is that if humans evolved from the neanderthal man.. why do we still have chimps and gorillas and monkeys today?. Evolution doesn't make logical sense. I mean how can someones mutations of blood clots develop over time, it does not come in stages otherwise we would have bled to death. its like saying, i'll feel pain before i have developed brain cells to feel pain.
ahbedinnumbernine 1 month ago
No, atheism has existed long before any idea of evolution. Example : Diderot. Atheists don't have a problem not having answers, we'd rather admit we don't know than pretend we do.
But evolution is scientific fact and if you don't accept it you belong in the same category as flat-earthists. There's no discution about this.
This video proves nothing, it's not science, those morons are not scientists, they do not understand science and this isn't a scientific journal.
ivanlagrossemoule 1 month ago
Evoulution is a lie. This video proved it. Its based on the science at the 19th century it makes me feel sick. Monkeys can't transform into humans just like i phone 3 can't transform into i phone 4 and they both have a creator or can they exist by chance? Maybe if we waited 5000000000 years the i phone will be a train. Maybe why not? Athesists say that our religion is stupid. What about evoulution or should i say darwin's imagination. So stupid and childish.
TheMultitube1 2 months ago
@TheMultitube1 First off, evolution has nothing to do with atheism. Atheism is the lack of religion. Evolution is a scientific theory and a fact.
If you want to question science, first get a scientific education. Then all you have to do is publish the evidence against evolution in a scientific paper. But not a single person was able to do that in 150 years. It's because there's no evidence against evolution, whether you accept it or not.
ivanlagrossemoule 2 months ago
@ivanlagrossemoule firstly if evoulution is WRONG so athesim is WRONG because without it they would have no answer to the origin of life. evoulution. secondly, i read darwins book but he based his ideas on some false incorrect scientfic knowldge that was there at the time. lastly, there is no real evidence for evolution. did you know why alot of people and scientists supported darwin's idea at that time because it went against the CHURCH not because its scientific value. this video proves it
TheMultitube1 1 month ago
@TheMultitube1 Please, educate yourself. Your comments read as those from a very immaturely developed brain.
DonLeVisi 1 month ago
@DonLeVisi I am educated.I am not against science at all I am just against some ideas of evolution. you have no right to tell me that I have an'' immaturely developed brain''. I am only against that apes evolved to humans. until now i did'nt see any solid proof for evolution. I can believe that that creatures can change but not to a different creature. if you research the theory of evolution you will see that every thing started basic then to complex.
TheMultitube1 1 month ago
@DonLeVisi but DNA doesn't work this way it only can lose information. please tell me why do you believe in evolution and correct me if I said anything wrong. thanks
TheMultitube1 1 month ago
science has its place in our society however science is not the substitute for a logical faith in a GOD that has given us the logical understanding of our own creation.Evolution only occurs within species of its own kind.
prime440 4 months ago
@prime440 "...a logical faith in a God"...? Logical...? Surely you mean 'irrational'
DonLeVisi 4 months ago
@DonLeVisi creation is much more logical that evolution.evolution has to have a starting point , the origin of species cannot survive without a creator, if you thin otherwise explain it to me.
prime440 4 months ago
@prime440 "Creation is much more logical..." How is this so...? What caused creation...? An uncaused cause...? Doesn't sound very logical at all.
You are assuming there is a "creator", when the fact is, we simply have no facts about the origins (if any) of matter.
However, evolution is concerned with the development of biological populations over generations.
Evolution doesn't attempt to answer the origins (if any) of matter.
DonLeVisi 4 months ago
@DonLeVisi
Evolution is pushed by most scientists in a very bias way, one, to keep funds coming through, two, they are scared of accepting that a creator is most possible to exist, three, they will be out of a job and ignored, four, life would not be interesting anymore for them, five, they hate god, six, the scientific community is a cult like community, if one speaks of I.D the rest will turn their backs.
Science is moulded around the theory of ev. it can be done if you want it that way.
hudfadz 3 months ago
@hudfadz Reading your response, it would seem you are very biased against scientists.
Gravity is a theory. If a scientist states he has an alternate theory, he/she should provide compelling evidence to support it, else gravity is the accepted explanation. Would they be classed as a cult community for this...?
Your post makes a lot of assumptions, with no evidence to support them.
DonLeVisi 3 months ago
@DonLeVisi You're right, creation might not seem logical, that depends on the type of logical argument you use. Most sciences apply a 'deductive logical' argument. Creation is more logical than evolution in an 'inductive logical' argument. This type of logical arguments is commonly used in some geology studies (e.g. fieldwork) and in forensic and criminal investigation science where e.g. your finger print is LOGICALLY considered an evidence of your previous presence in the crime scene
DiGa25 1 month ago
@DiGa25 Inductive reasoning can't even be applied correctly to 'creationism'.
There is no valid evidence for creationism to even induce the idea of creationism from.
Someone can not say, "life as we know it, is evidence for creationism." That isn't inductive reasoning; that is taking a huge leap of faith from A to Z with a complete absence in determining B,C,D,.....W,X,Y,
DonLeVisi 1 month ago