John Edwards Follow Up WTC7

[Arivol]

It's pretty annoying with you guys just calling them crazy and have no other type of rebuttal. Sometimes its hard to see why so many people just blindly take what they hear as the truth, I mean there is obviously no bias or greed in the world, so why would anything be faked or made up right?

Even if he thought they were crazy he gave him his word that he would get back to them. He could have even used the generic argument for WTC7 collapsing, but he didn't even give them that.

[ExoticGawdess]

John Kerry admitted that they "made the decision to pull WTC7" because it suffered some damage. So, that's admission of controlled demolition (despite an excuse to do it).

Add this to Larry Silvestein's admission on tape that they "made the decision to pull it" regarding a controlled demolition of a WTC building on 9/11.

We have two admissions of guilt (and inside job) by credible sources: the building leasee and a senator.

That's evidence. Testimony of insiders in the know.

[CaptainTae]

Maybe he didn't respond because you are NUTS.

[lonchecaliente]

Great job guys!! you are true patriots..

much respect.

[PoetryHound]

LOL, cool shades.

Secret Agent Man!

[newdad1107]

I have a question, Do you wear those sunglasses at night?

[liez4love]

Well I wasn't wearing sunglasses in this video. And no, I dont wear sunglasses at night. But good question....

[JLiqour]

@liez4love Okay so.......since you're clearly a retard, I believe that person was referring to the douche sitting next to you then. Have fun with your conspiracy shit, it's good to know you have a lot of time on your hands shitting in the faces of all the victims and their families just so you can get attention. Almost a decade has passed, and none of your half assed logic has proven anything. Just stop.

[mskizmiass]

@JLiqour

It is a decade and nobody has explained why we financed the terrorists with a $100,000 payment to Mahommad Atta.

Thngs that make you go hmmmmmm

Do you remember what the cover up said about the payment?

[kalbahamut]

After seeing these videos I must say I'm very disappointed in John Edwards. Not for failing to call you guys, but rather because he didn't humiliate you on the spot in front of all those people as he should have, and actually in a way sort of dignifying your idiocy by saying that he would look into the matter.

[liez4love]

I know right. I should of asked him about CFR instead. Funny when people blow off the "9/11 conspiracies" and don't even look into them. Maybe if I took it from the CFR and Bilderberg perspectives, and asked him a question about his involvement in that, you dumb asses wouldn't feel obligated to comment on shit you don't even know.

[literaturesurvey]

OK

1. How about the missile underneath the plane? Rewind, every single footage: from RipPublicCONs, 2 FOX .. n stop it right b4 hits the tower. Man, U can't miss the missile.

2. And 5 Israelis, arrested by FBI, with a VAN loaded, with BOMBS in GW NJ Bridge?

3. And 40-story high SMOKE coming outa the S. Tower, 30 min, B4 the towers collapse?

4. And people come 2 the windows, asking 4 help? HEAT must CARBONIZE PEOPLE, if it MELTS the STEEL.

Look 4 PLANE SITE

Stop worshiping 666

[gtdrummerdude]

He only took down your first name and email address. If you were interviewed for a job and the employer wrote down only your first name and email address, but told you they'd contact you, would you really expect to get the job? John Edwards was probably pissed off that another fucking idiot was wasting his time with the 9/11 conspiracy. He heard you out so he wouldn't look like an ass in public, but honestly he isn't going to take his time to personally email a single kid about a bullshit topic.

[anyfekinnamewilldo]

Morons.. get a fucking job

[liez4love]

What a great point. Because I hate my government and all government, and people for that matter. I must not have a job. So your comment stating I should get a job is very well thought out.

[anyfekinnamewilldo]

Hey that's deep man.

[liez4love]

No actually its not. It was a joke,

You fucking moron. Get a job.......

[anyfekinnamewilldo]

A joke heydamn! Your rapier-like wit and astounding intellect are lost on me! Dude..what makes u think a US Presidential candidate would or should take the time to respond to a 15 yr old conspiracy theorist? Are you on crack?

[liez4love]

Well I guess my first reaction to thinking he would get back to me was when he gave me his word he would get back to me. Guess I should of known better, eh?

[172drvr]

Grounds for a conspiracy right there.

[MustacheVerra]

No big surprise here!

[chowbelly]

He knew he couldn't fool you so he dismissed you and looked good doing it. Edwards knows exactly what happened, as do a growing number of us.

[aaroninpa]

maybe Sen Edwards doesn't associated with nuts like you guys???

[liez4love]

yeah, good point. Maybe he doesn't associated.

dipshit.

[hiwaymanx]

Or maybe Edwards is just plain disassociated-like, with his wife and his political career.

[beastshawnee]

When I lived in North Carolina, some people were protesting him for something to do with an oil scandal or something. This was before I was awakened to the truths of 9/11, so I'm not sure what is his connection to all this, but he probably has one because he seems to be a political favorite, and it can't be just his charming looks. I wish I could remember what that protest was about...

[liez4love]

Edwards is a Bilderberg as well.

[AlmightScoop]

John Edwards is a charletan. Hes not getting back at anyone beause he is a con artist. He pleased the crowd, increced his reputation and probably sold a few book because of it. Even if he did get back to Robbie, his reply would have nothing of value.

[liez4love]

He still has not gotten back to me. Already been a year.

[beastshawnee]

It would have been better if you HAD been tazed; that might have gotten someone's attention. Do you think that the polititians really don't already know the truth?

[liez4love]

Haha, I wish I would of been tackled by law enforcement and tased, instead of told, "he would get back to me."

[daderone]

i'm not excusing or saying u should be satisfied. not at all. I am saying i just came from watching Guiliani get the same questions, remember what happend with Kerry. I thinknot only were Edwards supporters sympathetic and informed on what you were asking but invited your comments openly and gave you the floor and respect.

Just some things i think worth considering.

[liez4love]

Well actually, after I asked that questions.

I found that close to all Edwards supporters did not know about WTC7 at all. The ones that did, were the ones speaking up. But after I asked that question, I had many people come up to me and ask what I was talking about.

[daderone]

well i do. I'm an Edwards supporter. Isn't that refreshing compared to being called a terrorist, a conspiracy theorist and having people chant names to silence you?

[daderone]

You have to be on top of things like that yourself buddy. You think even John Edwards' volunteers can just drop a note off a note or send an email...leave a message at the campaign and count on getting a response without really following up. For example i know everything you know about 9/11 and prob. payed attention prior 2 yourselves. volunteered 4 edwards, gave money. How many messages do u think i've gotten feedback on? Only ones i pressed and followed up on. even then. its a nat. campaign

[liez4love]

And, I HAVE kept on Edwards to get back to me. I made this video first. I sent emails, and letters. But after he GAVE me his word, that he would get back to me. Maybe you should reconsider what this puppet says. He will say anything to make him the crowd favorite.

[daderone]

again all i was pointing out is that if u look his supporters didn't seem at all hostile and infact welcomed it...and he didn't just ignore u and have u tazed.

ok? ok.

[liez4love]

Getting tazed is one thing. But he did just ignore me. He has not gotten back to me yet.

He couldnt ignore me cause that would make his supporters question it. So he had to pull it off by telling me he would get into it. That way the crowd is happy, and no one will ever know.

[daderone]

ok well i'm just saying...I'll send a letter too.

I don't see why you're so quick to make an assumption because you've gotten an undesirable response. You can be cynical all you want 2. Truth is like I said I've been active in their campaign(which is done) and left many a messages. It would be great if u really got a call back for leaving a message or requesting a password sometimes from the campaign.

[daderone]

i'm just saying if i follow your logic they never got back to me about buying massive amounts of signs, because they didn't want the money and the advertising. My password request was never sent to me no matter how many times i requested it because they didn't want me phone banking for John Edwards. They never fixed the coding in the fundraising thermometer so i couldn't post it. Because they didn't want people to see how much money i was raising with my friends. I think thats unrealistic.

[daderone]

so all i'm saying is u don't know. u can make assumptions or take it personal because it was your personal question. However as someone who shares your concerns and knows many a thing about 9/11. I do not think u r a conspiracy theorist. I think you're an intelligent and concerned citizen. I do think we can all sometimes be more productive in working towards getting what we want done. So thanks for asking the question. Thanks for speaking up, you're not alone.

[kaz00you]

Of course he is NOT going to get back to you ....... YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON

[winklestraat]

what has always concerned me about the whole thing are the STILL unanswered questions!

[k3304]

George Fucking Bush flew the plane into building 7

is that your correct answer, liberals ?

[liez4love]

yes. thats exactly what we think. We actually think that George "Fucking" Bush flew the plane himself into WTC7....

dipshit.

[dFLuXb]

Check out Ron Paul's opinions on 9-11-01

[Fuliginosus]

I had thought John Edwards seemed like a decent guy, up until this WTC7 question; now I think he's a dickhead. I wonder if Obama has ever addressed this controversy.

[marcusjansen239369]

JOhn Edwards is CFR! Look at up...He is a RAT like all the others except Kusinich and Ron Paul 4 President!

[daderone]

ron paul is the biggest liar and imposter of them all.

[TheTestTubeMind]

ALL GOVERMENT IS IN ON IT IF THERE IS ANYTHIGN TO BE IN ON these Biast Political nuts are self serving.

[citruc2]

on 9/11 edwards was a senate intelligence committee member, he's in on it.

[Jim0000000002]

He'll never get a response back, just like Bilderberg won't be opened to the press, not even the corporate controlled press. That's why we need to step it up. I really don't care if people are polite and gentlemanly to these barbarian puppets.  They and their masters are going down.

[liez4love]

if only we could get more people to step it up. im worried for when they will come after us. every one is just going to fall for it...

[boyoben]

I just really don't follow the logic of the plan the government made. First we will kill a bunch of people on an air plane, then we will scrap those planes and use military drones to fly into the Trade Towers, then for the hell of it we blow up building 7 (but not w/ a plane) oh and then we will hit the pentagon with a missile, just because. Then blame it on bin laden, wait 2 years and change our story to say it was Saddam so we can get the oil.

[boyoben]

That just seems like a very dumb plan, why not just use airplanes on all of the buildings? Also, why knock down the towers, wouldn't hitting them with 2 airplanes be enough?

[liez4love]

who ever said i thought "military drones" flew into the building? and no it wasnt about the oil. and it wasnt for the hell of it. I believe in the NWO conspriacy, and if you follow with that, you will see why i believe the "govt" did it. And your right, if they were hit with two airplanes, they probably would of collapsed due to the two planes in each tower, however only one hit them.

[liez4love]

and you cant say Silverstein didnt have control of the guy pulling out. You and I werent there. WE WILL NEVER KNOW. But to turn down plausible questions that have not been ansrewed by officals due to ignorance and straight belief and blind following of the government, is probably the saddest thing i have seen.

[liez4love]

What i dont understand is why people like you try to ansrew for the people who ask these questions, instead of presidents, instead of congressman, instead of any body you see on mainstream media.

and for you to critize people who do ask questions, and who dont accept the spoon fed bull shit the media gives us, that is crazy. You are a prime example of a sheep.

[boyoben]

Ok, you obviously do not know who you are talking to. I am one of the most critical people of what I am being told in the media that I know. I don't believe the official story because it's fed to me in the media. I agree with the official story because it is the only narrative that has passed scientific peer review. The mainstream media has to report facts at least some of the time. Why would they waste their time on this story if there is no RELIABLE scientific evidence to back it?

[boyoben]

Well, to say the government hijacked airplanes and directed 9/11 based on facts that "we will never know" is equally as sad.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

-Carl Sagan.

[boyoben]

So what would the "NWO" have to gain from this? A decrease in population? Come on, if the NWO wanted to decrease the world's population to 300 million or whatever the number is, all they would need to do is give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist organization. It's that simple.

[liez4love]

hahahaha excuse me, i didnt know who i was talking to.

umm why are you answering your own question? the NWO wants global domination. Are you familiar with the NWO? No, you arnt, so dont pretend like you can shoot that down. Your attacking multiple things that you have no idea wtf your talking about. And no it isnt "that simple".

[liez4love]

"Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence"

- Carl Sagan, (i love that guy)

[liez4love]

"Why would they waste their time on this story if there is no RELIABLE scientific evidence to back it? "

the media covers the stupidest stories i have ever seen. Fox news completely covers bull shit. Outfoxed is a great documentary that shows the fox news channel covering bull shit stories all the time.

[liez4love]

why dont they cover all these 9/11 turth movements, all the protests being held by these groups. you never find them on the media. Why? other protests always make it on tv. Why cant they cover these protests? the media goes to ridiclous lengths to avoid are claims. Even if they are fake, why arnt we getting the answers we demand from the people we ask them from?

[boyoben]

There are three reasons they won't cover the 9/11 truth movement, and they are in this order.

1.) The media is too busy covering stories with a conservative bias.

2.) The media is too busy covering the gossip column (I.E. Paris Hilton, Linday Lohan)

3.) (probably the least valid of the three) the 9/11 truth movement's theories haven't passed scientific peer review.

[liez4love]

9/11 was a perfectly planned attempt to gain american support with a war for the middle east. with american occupation of iraq we were able to establish "democracy" (are own corrupted government) in iraq. this leads to more puppet candidates, thus leading to control of everything with the puppets in place.

[liez4love]

and by blaming the attacks on a war lord terrorist group based in middle east, with out a specific country, that gave the american armies the right to go to any contry they want to "fight for freedom" .

[liez4love]

check out "bohemian grove" google it, or youtube it. its some freaky shit, idk if it will pass your peer review you rave about. But, its rather hard to deny what you see. esp the interview with the David Gergen, that alex jones gives.

[liez4love]

now that i think about it, i think in demon haunted world, Carl Sagan brings up, in a joking manor, NWO, when he is talking about crazy conspriacies that people believe.

[boyoben]

I saw the infowars videos about a year ago. I also saw the Bohemian Grove video. There really wasn't that much in there to me. Just a bunch of guys going to a play. All the stuff about wild orgies and everybody running around naked seemed to be (if my memory serves) either quote mined or taken out of context. Even if it wasn't, that's all heresay.

It sounds more like a little hang out that elitists go to, probably some tradition started by some president or something

[boyoben]

I saw the infowars videos about a year ago. I also saw the Bohemian Grove video. There really wasn't that much in there to me. Just a bunch of guys going to a play. All the stuff about wild orgies and everybody running around naked seemed to be (if my memory serves) either quote mined or taken out of context. Even if it wasn't, that's all heresay.

It sounds more like a little hang out that elitists go to, probably some tradition started by some president or something

[boyoben]

The interview with David Gergen went as follows: Alex Jones ambushes him, then misquotes him. David Gergen said "I didn't run around in the woods naked." Probably because he is aware of the rumors going on there. Nowhere did he say "like they did." that was Alex Jones putting it in for him. Then he continues to pressure him. Then he says "that's a face keeping a lot of secrets". I dunno wtf that even means but ok.

[liez4love]

regardless, do you not think its weird that a bunch of elites go there?

[boyoben]

Yeah, it's weird... but I don't think it's as strange as Alex Jones makes it out to be. I think people tend to make a mountain out of a mole hill about things like this. I saw one person even accuse everybody who went of worshipping Satan. It's probably some old tradition and nothing more. Jones makes a lot of claims, but I didn't see any naked world leaders in his video. ;)

[liez4love]

too bad :( hah, yeah. I just think we should be asking these questions, straight to them. John Edwards still has not gotten back to me yet, and to think he gave me his word? why would we want some one like this who cant keep a simple small little promise to me?

[liez4love]

"If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs." - Sagan

[boyoben]

I agree, we need to be skeptical of authority, but we also need to be equally as skeptical of our own arguments.

[liez4love]

exactly, and this isnt one of those issues. sure you may feel strong about your opinion, but there are a growing amount of 9/11 cover up believers.

[boyoben]

Majority opinion, as you know from being in the minority on this issue is great for making policy, but horrible for figuring out true facts.

[liez4love]

we are the miniority, but a sad fact of the matter is the majority doesnt even know how many buildings fell on 9/11.

[boyoben]

Number three is a big red flag to me, because it is a sign that these theories need to be more closely examined before being put in a video and distributed publicly. I don't even recall there being a disclamer on the Loose Change video stating that these claims have yet to be peer reviewed. Have you read Sagan's book The Demon Haunted World?

[liez4love]

Yes i have, one of my favorite books.

and my crazy conspriacy is that the NWO did 9/11 as a step towards world domination. Population control comes in other steps or other types. NOT 9/11.

[boyoben]

No, one of the main goals of the NWO is to decrease the worldwide population. I don't know what the NWO can possibly gain from this (besides that), if it even exists, I've been pretty involved in politics and have never seen or heard from these people. Then again, I've only worked for progressive candidates who would reject anything even remotely close to an NWO so that could possibly be why.

[ginerlynn]

Oh hell,they are all corrupt sleazebags,david.

[boyoben]

*yawn*

9/11 was NOT an inside job, there is no evidence of a controlled demolition.

[liez4love]

wtc7?  squibs?

[boyoben]

wtc 7 was damaged on the South side, and the south side fell first. The squbs appeared AFTER the tower began to collapse, which means that they could not have possibly been the cause of the collapse.

[liez4love]

..... wow, brainwashing at its best.. if the WTC7 did fall on the south side first, why does it come down straight? and collaspe on its self with the crimp? have you seen wtc7 fall?

The squibs appear further below the building. for controlled implosion they go in sequence, thus you are right, in a sense as to they didnt start the intial fall, however for falling at free fall, the squibs had to take out the supports further down the building.

the twin towers were made in three parts.

[liez4love]

ironically these three parts were to act as supports to if the building were ever to collapse, the other part would stand the the rest of the building would fall elsewhere. Why did this work? thats what they were made to do. if you watch the squibs closely, big one come right at these three parts, to insure a continous collapse. .

*yawn?*

[boyoben]

The Squibs can also be from the intense air pressure that would result from the pancaking effect of the trade towers collapsing. At best, these "squibs" are inconclusive for evidence one way or another.

[boyoben]

Have you seen the entire 13 second video of wtc7 or the 6.5 second video? There is a major difference. In the 13 second version you can clearly see the south east penthouse fall, then the rest of the building. Also debris from the North side of wtc7 all fell on top of debris from the south side, indicating that the south side did indeed fall first. This is consistent with reports from firefighters on the ground.

[boyoben]

By the way, have you EVER seen a controlled demolition where the explosions start at the top of the building and then work their way down?

[liez4love]

if you actually watch the squibs, yes a few are a few floors right below the collapse. However the squibs that are a good 10 or more floors below can not be the result of air pressure.

[boyoben]

Actually, yes it could and if you read the testimony from the firefighters who were rescued inside the World Trade Center after it fell, they all said the first thing they felt was an incredibly strong gust of wind, one even said the wind blew his buddy off his feet. The fact that there was intense air pressure is consistent with what firefighters on the ground reported.

[liez4love]

if there was intense air pressure, there would of been much more squibs with the windows busting. And actually most firefighters that do, do question the govt story themselves.

[boyoben]

Really? Please, name them, also name how many support the 9/11 truth movement. I would love to hear this.

[liez4love]

hmm good point, i guess all there is are the polls. and its obvious that you are not going to agree with me on the squibs, or any of this.(dont think i cant argue this, we can go all day) but can you tell me is it coincidence Larry Silverstein the lease owner of the building, had first lost the bet for the lease in 2001, and then after losing the bet, the person who had out bid him pulled out, and 7 weeks before 9/11 the attacks had happened.

[liez4love]

this was the first time in the buildings history that it had changed managment. with a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center, Silverstein insured the property. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, he demanded payment for the destruction of the towers as two different terrorist attacks, increasing his money to roughly 7.1 billion dollars.

[liez4love]

What else might be a coincidence? that Mariv P Bush, (George Bush's younger brother) was the director of a new secuirty system installed at the trade centers from 1996-2000 from a company called Securacom. They were supposly installing a new electronic secuirty system through out the buildings.

Wirt D Walker the third (cousin of bush) is the CEO of that company as well, from 1999-2002

[liez4love]

or what about all the practice drills ran by NORAD that morning? Coincidence that they were pretending that airliners were hijacked and were going to be used to hit sky scrapers? or might you ask youself, no, maybe something is sketchy about the offical story?

[boyoben]

Well, I don't know all the details of the bidding process between Silverstein and Bider X, however, If this other person knew what was going to happen on 9/11, and then didn't buy the towers as a result, wouldn't he be testifying now saying that he was forewarned by the government that the towers would be attacked? He is obviously very wealthy and powerful therefore he shouldn't have much trouble protecting himself, and he would be difficult to bribe.

[liez4love]

thats not the person i am putting the spot light on. I am putting the spotlight on Silverstein. And saying he knew. and btw look all this stuff up. and ansrew my question. could it, just so happen, that maybe the story isnt right?

[boyoben]

Well, if the guy outbid Silverstein then that means Silverstein wouldn't have control over whether or not the guy gave up the lease. It was out of his hands. If this had anything to do with a secret plot to take down those buildings, the highest bidder would have to know about it, not the second highest.

[liez4love]

ummm no, and you cant say you know who knows about it. how would you know if the first bidder pulled out due to black mail, or something else. in all reality, we will never know the truth. but it doesnt hurt to ask questions.

[boyoben]

Why can't I say I know who knows about it? Because I didn't direct a 2 hour video of pseudoscience that can't pass peer review? You claim Silverstein knew about it because somebody changed their mind about leasing out the towres. Silverstein had no control of that.

[asperin]

he said that in the crowd to seem interrested,the dude is another nwo slave,he wont risk his career for the truth...

[cocodapitbull]

well said.

[qbeac]

If they don't answer, the american people should:

IMPEACH THEM!!!

Criminals in jail, not in government. People, WAKE UP!!!