A&E for 911 Truth North Tower exploding and pulverizing

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1400+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?

How can Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth be considered a professional organization when over 80% of its members are students?

How much of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's budget constitutes Richard gage's salary?

[2020starman]

@ctcole77 Couple of Negroid baboons, they don't know shit ! Troll warning ! two troll baboons, don't feed the apes !

[ctcole77]

@2020starman

Please answer the questions uneducated gullible shill.

911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

[BobBobbert100]

@kevinkoda Wow. It's almost like. You know. An airplane hit into it.

[ewingsco]

Inside Job.

[andrademeza]

@justamomforjesus most definately...false flag operation so they could have a reason to go into the middle east. thats no doubt. what i wonder is why they wanted to go in there, whats the benefit? what are they getting out of this.

[BobBobbert100]

People like you disappoint me. I honestly don't believe that there is any way that 9/11 is an inside job, or even that it had any kind of a chance to be an inside job. I honestly believe that if it was even slightly known about prior to anywhere in the government, it would have been brought to light by Assange or anyone else who has more than the decency of an utter slimeball such as yourself.

[andrademeza]

@BobBobbert100 why dont you believe 9/11 was an inside job or couldnt have a chance of being an inside job? what are your reasons?

[kevinkoda]

@BobBobbert100 ..thats cos you dont open your eyes further than CNN or have an understanding of the laws of physics..nor have looked into the Trilateral Commission... oh forget it ..youre a blinkered tit

[EvanesEmperor]

Just a quick comment here: if someone says they know what they know because of "god", please watch out.

Anyways, Popular Mechanics, NIST, UL and their "scientists" have already debunked this. It was the planes and then the pancake theory, followed by the inward bowing theory, followed by, oh wait, it stopped there.  Yeah they pretty much couldn't come up with anything rational to explain these collapses. Those are the REAL traitors. 10 years later: enjoy the bodyscanners and molestation.

[kevinkoda]

Tomo... I've gone round in circles too many times with tossers who can view the collapse of WTC7 and agree with the official story, so feel free to have your snipy little comment on how I think how I operate how I'm influenced.. Then, oh whatever...

[kevinkoda]

Tomo.. You must do this as a profession, NOBODY is as stupid as you are professing to be.. Nice try, but I prefer honesty and intelligence over obfuscation and lies.. Have a nice life you loser

[TomozukiII]

@justamomforjesus Sure, there was a fire inside the building ;)

[billy1263]

Some people need to get a life, conspirators abound in every area of life. The way the towers were designed the braces that held up the floors just could not hold that amount of weight and each floor collapsed under the heavy load that was place on it and as gravity took each floor the more energy was released. It is not a conspiracy just a poorly designed building. If you remember a B25 bomber ( 2X the size of a 737)struck the Empire State Building in 1945 and it did not collapse(well designed)

[pjconnor74]

@billy1263 I think you just disproved yourself, mate. Something twice the size striking something better designed only minor damage was sustained? If your argument was true then the design for the twin towers must have been made by a 3 year-old with a set of LEGOs.

[kevinkoda]

@pjconnor74 ..well said PJ..always good to come across someone with intelligence and integrity, instead of all these idiots/government stooges

[kevinkoda]

@billy1263 ...dont be a dick.. really..

ok..where were all those floors? how did they turn to dust..

oh forget it, youre a fool

[billy1263]

@kevinkoda Name calling that's nice..."How did they turn to dust?"

Well concrete is made up of dust (sand, mortar, gravel and water).

Under the heavy pressure of the collapsing floors every thing was pulverized into dust.

Oh and btw I'm not a fool just educated...

[KILLBILDERBURG]

@billy1263 ....not a fool just eductaed,, ok then clever boy.. how did massive parts of the buildings fly hundreds of feet sideways...how did the buidlings fall with zero resistance... why arent the two uncrushed top floors left at the base.. concrete DOES NOT turn to dust, it creates a great big pile, that through gravity and resistance slows leaving (what should be) a huge pile... why were there massive heat signatures reported by NASA weeks/months following the collapses.. still feel clever?

[kevinkoda]

Tomo - get a brain

[TomozukiII]

@kevinkoda Like you, right? 

[kevinkoda]

@TomozukiII ..thats right, like me and many others who can acknowledge the laws of physics

[TomozukiII]

@kevinkoda ...guess I don`t have the knowledge to compete with the true scientits with a degree out of physics... or conspiracy fan(atic paranoid)s convinced by youtube experts. Your slogan probably is: Our life is a lie ;) Get a (real) life than...

[kevinkoda]

@TomozukiII ..its not a case of being 'convinced by youtube experts' just open your bloody eyes and use your own brain

WTC7 COULD NOT COLLAPSE IN THE MANNER IN WHICH IT DID DUE TO OFFICE FIRES

I dont need any expert to work that out for me, nor should you, unless youre stupid

[TomozukiII]

@kevinkoda Perhaps I am stupid and blind but I rather believe experts seen on NGC or Discovery rather than some freaking mob without any experts whatsoever who just came to an idea that this was a set up. There were so many information which were scientificaly prooven that none of this theories work. Therefore, there never was a similar case of building being brought down by a commercial airliner. Proove me wrong. I have so many questions you couldn`t answer them all. Non of theorists could.

[Kevkoda]

@TomozukiII ..no perhaps about it..and forget questions..until youre capable of intelligent free independant thought, youre not worth conversing with

[TomozukiII]

@Kevkoda Free independent thought? Do you realise what you`ve just said? Don`t tell me that you came to this idea by yourself... You`ve seen it on You Tube, you`ve checked Zeitgeist and you joined the people who aren`t brainwashed by goverment scientists like me but by freemasons who always got the paranoia feeling of being misled. So don`t preach me about free independent thought because you are same like the rest of us. Hence, you even don`t have arguments for your statements.

[kevinkoda]

@TomozukiII ...oh I forgot to mention..

FUCK OFF A D DIE YOU CUNT

[TomozukiII]

@kevinkoda

Jeeeesh, what an insult :D I think I`ll rather fuck on and live. Therefore I have a dick... check my profile ;)

[DanSVT03]

@kevinkoda "WTC7 COULD NOT COLLAPSE IN THE MANNER IN WHICH IT DID DUE TO OFFICE FIRES"

I'm affraid you are 100% wrong, son. When you let a huge fire burn out of control inside of a steel structured building, it's only a matter of time before the steel weakens to the point of failure. Especially when the fire effects critical structural members which were the main load carrying elements in the building.

[kevinkoda]

@DanSVT03 ....spent to much energy trying to point out obvious physics to close-minded idiots..so I wish you all the best in your mainstream media world.. You're a genuinely blinkered fool, and any further comments from you will be simply deleted.. I can only suffer a fool for so long

[DanSVT03]

@kevinkoda I haven't seen one bit of you trying to "point out obvious physics" to anyone. But now that you've gotten my (soon to learn, highly unwanted) attention, why don't you go ahead and spell it out for me, homeboy...

I'll be waiting for my "physics lesson" very eagerly.

B.S. Engineering

11+ Years steel fabrication experience

FE, EIT, PE in progress

[TomozukiII]

@kevinkoda

You are pretty stupid for so many (pedi)degrees ;) Why don`t you find a site, where every your conspiracy theory falls faster than a pancake collision because it is explained in a real scientific matter. I checked your profile and you are keen to chemtrails too? :D Seen too many Sci-Fi movies lately?

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

@DanSVT03 There were explosions heard, Especially the explosion at the base of building 7. You stated that "its only a matter of time before the steel weakens to the point of failure. Especially when fire effects critical structural members which were the main load carrying elements in the building." Well Dan, For the building to fall so symetricall and with periods of freefall the heat would have had to have been much hotter and been directly melting every support collumn from top to bottom.

[DanSVT03]

@BuxomBabeXOXO Listen there Babe, we're talking about two giant buildings & another 47 story building which were all filled with all kinds of equipment that can and will explode if they are damaged or on fire. I have no doubt what so ever that people around ground zero would have heard "explosions" from things like damaged electrical equipment, fuel tanks, HVAC equipment, compressed air/gas tanks, etc etc. Why is it that no audio from commercial grade explosives were picked up on camera?

[DanSVT03]

@BuxomBabeXOXO "For the building to fall so symetricall and with periods of freefall the heat would have had to have been much hotter and been directly melting every support collumn from top to bottom."

Wrong. DEAD wrong....

You let a giant fire burn out of control in a building, especially in a critical area... say, the area where all 3 main support trusses that cary rnearly the ENTIRE load of the building are, then it's like bashing Kobe Bryant in the knees with an aluminum baseball bat.

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

@DanSVT03 no danny boy you are dead wrong. Every support collumn from top to bottom would have had to have been damaged with precision timing. Most of the fuel burned outside the building and office fires have never made a building collapse the way it did. And as for building 7 there was no plane that crashed into it at all, and it was a perfect executed controlled demolition job.

[StMin85]

@BuxomBabeXOXO Don't west your time with people like that.

[djonesowens1]

The narrator needs to be identified in the description of this video, with his qualifications.

[TomozukiII]

Sure. 100 of demolitionists would work more than a month on a building like that to plant so many explosives and fuses. And nobody would see them doing it at all. There is also not a single sight of explosion, just dust. I don`t know why is so had to understand that burning fuel soften the metal structure and the building collapsed because of that. Why are "so called explosions" ahead of the dust is simple. Floors are falling much faster than the dust.

[pjconnor74]

@TomozukiII so softened metal can abruptly and for no reason cause a lateral velocity of 70mph? You're a tool. Funny how the metal was uniformly softened causing a vertical collapse resulting from a lateral collision. Jet fuel burns hot, yes this is true. But not that hot, and a single 737 doesn't have enough fuel to destroy a building of this magnitude.

[TomozukiII]

@pjconnor74 Even more than 70mph. If you skydive, you can reach up to 120mph in a very short period of time (a = F/m). Have you ever seen the structure of those Twins? Heavy concrete floor on steel construction which wasn`t even fire protected with foam. Hence, take a look at the closed compartment such as tunnel with a burning car in it. Temperatures reach close to 5000°c - 1200°c is the melting point of concrete. Once a single floor is destroyed, you got the domino effect. No conspiracy.

[akparker1]

Period.

[erublind]

You are familiar with the laws of gravity and Boyles law, yes?

Nuff said....

[daveyow]

i see thousands of american civilians murdered by their own government in the name of money and control, that's what i see.

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

There were much more explosives planted in the WTC buildings than in most controlled demolition jobs because they wanted the public to think that a pancake collapse had happened, but there were periods of freefall that proved the pancake theory false not to mention the visible squibs and the eyewitnesses who stated that there were explosives going off on many floors and in the basement and in the lobby of building 7.

[DanSVT03]

@BuxomBabeXOXO And yet not a single camera pointed at ground zero that day captured the sounds of them going off. A controlled demolition of even a small 10 floor office building is so loud that it can be heard up to 5 miles away. Yet here we are on 9/11, with the largest controlled demolition ever conducted, and not one single camera captured the demolition waves. I wonder why that is....? Common sense tells me it's because 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but rather a tragic accident.

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

This building is completely pulversized. I have seen many buildings burned and buildings that were destroyed and buildings that even fell over. No building in the world has ever been demolished like the Twin Towers and building 7 unless it was a controlled demolition job. Anyone who tries to say that this was the first time this actually happened to 3 buildings on the same day is just a naive and delusional person, or just a shill lieing to disinform the public.

[LOLCATS3111]

BuxomBabeXOXO - PLEASE show us another 110 story building that was impacted by a 767 burned for an hour AND DIDN'T COLLAPSE

Please show us a 47 story building that was a tube in tube design, had uncontrolled fires burning for 7 hours AND DIDN'T COLLAPSE

by the way do you know what's naive and delusional ???

a person like you with ZERO education, knowledge, or practical experience in structural engineering who thinks they know more then PhD level structural engineers with YEARS of experience

[BuxomBabeXOXO]

This building was a controlled demolition job for sure. Look how the debri shoots so far away from the building instead of just falling down close by. Where is the network of metal beams that were interlaced? Everything is pulverised.

[LOLCATS3111]

BuxomBabeXOXO - PLEASE show us a controlled demolition where debris is shot out away from the building in that manner

instead of being a MORON why don't you go and research how many joules of stored energy were released when each Tower collapsed and if that amount of energy could eject debris like that !?!?!?!?!?

[stephen2152002]

The fancy wannabe smart language, but dumb doesn't prove a thing. The energy released was so high, because their were explosives! No natural matter of stored shit could have cause the buildings (not once, not twice, but three times) to collapse in their own footprints, with no resistance. Argue that. "But the joules...duh, the joules were released, like a lot...uh duh". I'm tired of the denial, this isn't going away. Justice will be served.

[stuzaza]

hey TimReed

[Floydian23]

@StMin

Stop bringing something as absurd as god into an argument over whether something happened or not through thermite reactions. Your mixing faith and science bud. That really won't help to drive your point as many can see the truth with no need for any of your so called gods.

[StMin85]

Floydian23

absurd as god?

WOW

There are no "gods" there is only one God.

You will never see the truth with out god. You don't see the truth now.

I know what i know because of god.

What a follishe comment that is.

[pjconnor74]

@StMin85 yet again, if you were as faithful as you claim to be, you would never spell "God" with a lowercase 'g'. You know what you know because man took the time, using the scientific method: to formulate a hypothesis, test it through experimentation, and refine said hypothesis to create a theory. If God wanted you to know everything you would be born knowing it. Obviously he didn't endow you with the knowledge of how to properly spell his name.

[kul9088]

@StMin85 it's not a foolish comment, he was merely saying don't bring religion into a debate over whether something happened with or without thermite reactions. 

[StMin85]

Floydian23

I will not debate with your ignorants.

We all die, sooner or later,

When it is your time you will see what a fool you are.

Get right with god its not to late.

[StMin85]

Floydian23

Accept jesus salvation.

Don't be a fool!

Jesus real name is Yahushua.

[pjconnor74]

@StMin85 if you were a true believer then you would never spell Jesus with a lowercase j.

[musicfoot]

aren't these guys giving a speech in sept in harvard?

[StMin85]

idk

[StMin85]

LVAzippy GOOD COMMENT!

[StMin85]

TheFifthApes

Chemist talks about the findings of explosives in dust from World Trade Center.

From Danish News the 6th of April 2009 - NIels Harrit, a danish chemist, tell about the breaking find, of the explsive substance nano-thermite, in the dust from WTC.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

watch?v=QibzBH8xK8Y

[StMin85]

TheFifthApes i was looking at your videos you have one that says "How to prove God doesn't exist."

If you cant see that God DOES exist you will naver see the truth on 911.

[StMin85]

TheFifthApes

""What thermIte? There was no thermite found at the WTC site. "

LOL YES There was thermite found!

watch?v=QibzBH8xK8Y"

[StMin85]

period!

[StMin85]

TheFifthApes really? Then were did the Thermite come from? LOL

[StMin85]

np hopefl1! keep up the good work with your videos!

[kjinks2004]

anyone who doesnt understand that 9/11 did'nt happen the way those lying piece of shit media faggots told us id did is never gona get it.

[StMin85]

lol i know!

[chena3]

i see

a building

blowing up

what the heck happened there....

[southshores777]

Great point! inside job that's fact!