this song is amazing!!! I cannot believe what kinds of comments are being said about this phenomenal music. the melody is so clever and michelangeli makes it so clear to the listener. it's pure schubert and his beautiful melodic development.
My suggestion for all you "" guys is to listen to it three times. Then you'll wake up one morning not being able to get it out of your head. You'll be compelled to listen JUST ONCE MORE. Before you know it, you'll be buying the sheet music!
We must learn not to bicker and deride each other over what composer was / is better than another...or what seems boring or exciting as it is a subjective matter....and to insult each other make fools of ourselves. The whole essence of the music is to free the spirit consciousness from the stone age mentality of wanting to kill each other for no good reason just because one disagrees with another. Come on!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i wont even entertain this.But comparing a Bach variation andf there are severalbesides the goldbergs and many places where he writes doubles,passacaille and chaconnes.Comparing Schubert 's mostly B O R I N G pf sonateas to anyone except Reger is incomprehensible.Actually most of the commentary on youtube is lazy and uninformed.Go to some of the contemporary posts : those that know don't say a word!
This is a rather unique movement, even for Schubert. I can't think of any other of his piano works that feature this kind of texture. I don't find it rambling, but one has to really let go of time and relax into it.
I haven't heard a lot of the Schubert sonatas, but I really like what I've heard of them. If you listen to the music, ignore the musical term "sonata", and have time to listen, it's very enjoyable. - sort of what you expect "typical piano music" to sound like.
Schubert is wonderful like Thalberg, because he leaves so much for the pianist to do. He writes great material, and the real trick behind bringing out all of the structure and wonderful sonority lies on the shoulders of the experienced pianist. He lets us all get in on the musicality, and it definitely has it's merits. Schubert is a wonderful composer to study for that reason, just like Albeniz, Alkan, Sorabji, Beethoven, Bach, and Scriabin can educate you on mostly everything else.
Questa musica incantevole ha il potere di incantarti e farti dimenticare ogni tribolazione. Speriamo esistano sempre grandi artisti in grado di interpretare la musica classica, l'unica e vera musica
I wanted to mean Gould and wrote Richter, that's why I wanted to suppress my post just after posting it, I believed that I did, but I was so "exhausted" that I failed to do this too :-D. (I'm not sure we think to the same quote.)
Do you know how long Beethoven's 9th Symphony is? Have you ever heard a Mahler symphony performed live? Do you know how long Beethoven's op. 111, 2nd mvt is? Are you familiar with the Goldberg variations? What about the Diabelli variations? The Eroica variations (for piano)?
When you've heard Schubert D 959, 4th mvt played with complete serenity and sensitivity, believe me, you will NEVER want the piece to end.
Once again, YouTube listeners refuse to read what I actually write! I said: "overlong AND RAMBLING." I would hardly classify the Beethoven 9th or any of the other pieces you mention as "rambling," as they all hold my interest from beginning to end and the Variation form happens to be one of my personal favorites,
Then that's just it. You say you love the variation form, yet Bach only wrote in that form once for a reason, and one could easily say the Diabelli & Eroica variations seem to go on and on (I don't), but the fact is there's more development in a Schubert sonata than in anyone's variations. The argument is you conveniently ignore the same qualities in Beethoven's 9th--with the endless 4th movement--that's in Schubert.
It's a tired response, and frankly ignorant, regarding Schubert.
There is no need to be insulting; that is a tired reponse from someone who has nothing of value to say. By the way, I am a highly sought after professional musician who probably knows more about music than you ever will. I like what I like, you like what you like and let's just leav eit at that. I find that most YouTube commentators are self righteous know it alls that brook no other opinion except their own.
Well, as always with Michelangeli, it's not boring. Pulse and "puncturing" of notes makes this piece sounding closer to fi. cm. von Weber then I earlier noticed.
Who knows what 'Schubert' would have wanted and who cares.Of course,you are very right to suggest however that this performance style is a whimsical Arte-Deco one.Certainly Not possible for a likely interpretive approach contemporary to Schubert or even fifty years after...as it deletes too many dimensions of articulation and rhythm
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I can't remember the amount of notes as he does nor do I gain income from a professional career as a pianist. I do think that this is tired performance and one that does not seem to have much life about it. The Steinway sound is there though.
Here HE is!!! the GOLD MASTER!!! listen what he makes out of this simple piece: touch & sound beauty+feeling= ART. M.Uchida is a great pianist,but listen to the same piece she plays and then tell me if this is not a quite DIEFFERENT WORLD
I didn´t express it properly - sorry. I wanted to say that Michelangeli is a far better pianist than Brendel. His recordings will always be treasures in my collection (right aside Carlos Kleiber).
If you've called someone "a master", you must at least have had in your head some such sentence as: He (subject) is (verb) a master (predicate). So what's your point?
I know that everybody some of you are not going to agree with me I think that this is perfect but boring. And again I admire Michelangeli in many other redentions.
this sonata ist not the best of all schubert sonatas and this mouvement hasnt to say much so it seems boring,but the way he plays is also here outstanding and very singular! - wanna say:composition a sort of boring,interpretation as well.
he plays this way too stiff in my opinion, there used to be a remarkable rendition by a pianist named plamena mangova, she really played it with feeling and a good attitude...
Thanks for pointing out Mangova's rendition. It is very lovely indeed. However, it is 3 minutes shorter than this one. She achieves an effect which is more pleasing to our modern ears by using much more damper and rubato. This version, which depends on what to us sound like very small chnages in dynamics is much closer to what was possible on a fortepiano -- Shubert's instrument. To appreciate this, you have to adjust your ear to the lesser dynamic range, like listening to Bach on a clavichord.
simply stunning...
aedo67 1 year ago 3
Excellent, so close to be perfect as it gets
mightysmeagol 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Peace on Earth.
montfiori 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Peace on Earth
montfiori 1 year ago
this song is amazing!!! I cannot believe what kinds of comments are being said about this phenomenal music. the melody is so clever and michelangeli makes it so clear to the listener. it's pure schubert and his beautiful melodic development.
blade42251 1 year ago 4
@blade42251 it is no song but a sonata
leenvalery 1 month ago in playlist michelangeli
My suggestion for all you "" guys is to listen to it three times. Then you'll wake up one morning not being able to get it out of your head. You'll be compelled to listen JUST ONCE MORE. Before you know it, you'll be buying the sheet music!
3rdgatebaptist 1 year ago 10
We must learn not to bicker and deride each other over what composer was / is better than another...or what seems boring or exciting as it is a subjective matter....and to insult each other make fools of ourselves. The whole essence of the music is to free the spirit consciousness from the stone age mentality of wanting to kill each other for no good reason just because one disagrees with another. Come on!
missionfarstar 1 year ago 13
@missionfarstar you sound like a pretty boring "go along to get along" type of person. Why shouldn't people disagree and debate their opinions?
Yellottwe 1 year ago
He opens and reads the heart of Schubert
Tapinaz 1 year ago 36
Comment removed
Tapinaz 1 year ago
hey thia artist certainly knew viennese music !
mradipatti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wont even entertain this.But comparing a Bach variation andf there are severalbesides the goldbergs and many places where he writes doubles,passacaille and chaconnes.Comparing Schubert 's mostly B O R I N G pf sonateas to anyone except Reger is incomprehensible.Actually most of the commentary on youtube is lazy and uninformed.Go to some of the contemporary posts : those that know don't say a word!
lovesGenet 2 years ago
...but you are saying a lot ...
hatem52 2 years ago 2
Thank You Master for opening my ignoble eyes to the infinite boredom of schuberts music.
I strongly recommend to You to stick to genet and not bother cultured people with Your moronisms
dereczynski 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@dereczynski
This is sleepy music admit it! He's no Beethoven for sure!
brassmonkeyjew 1 year ago
@lovesGenet no ear, no heart, no brain...poor guy...
mariusfelix 2 months ago
is it just me, or does this sound a lot like the theme from the last movement of D. 959?
mystuff730 2 years ago
yes it does
junglejim66 2 years ago
@mystuff730 it is! he beautifully reworked the theme from this movement in 959
mikejr41387 1 year ago 2
This is a rather unique movement, even for Schubert. I can't think of any other of his piano works that feature this kind of texture. I don't find it rambling, but one has to really let go of time and relax into it.
daniel15671 2 years ago
I haven't heard a lot of the Schubert sonatas, but I really like what I've heard of them. If you listen to the music, ignore the musical term "sonata", and have time to listen, it's very enjoyable. - sort of what you expect "typical piano music" to sound like.
iloveaccompanying 2 years ago 3
Schubert is wonderful like Thalberg, because he leaves so much for the pianist to do. He writes great material, and the real trick behind bringing out all of the structure and wonderful sonority lies on the shoulders of the experienced pianist. He lets us all get in on the musicality, and it definitely has it's merits. Schubert is a wonderful composer to study for that reason, just like Albeniz, Alkan, Sorabji, Beethoven, Bach, and Scriabin can educate you on mostly everything else.
Lukecash12 2 years ago
Comment removed
HeidiHao 2 years ago
Questa musica incantevole ha il potere di incantarti e farti dimenticare ogni tribolazione. Speriamo esistano sempre grandi artisti in grado di interpretare la musica classica, l'unica e vera musica
Frareggio80 2 years ago
Comment removed
howdilydoodily 2 years ago
I wanted to mean Gould and wrote Richter, that's why I wanted to suppress my post just after posting it, I believed that I did, but I was so "exhausted" that I failed to do this too :-D. (I'm not sure we think to the same quote.)
HeidiHao 2 years ago
It's just you.
killersax 2 years ago 16
Is it just me, or does anyone else find the Schubert Sonatas overlong and rambling?
billyguns2 2 years ago
Do you know how long Beethoven's 9th Symphony is? Have you ever heard a Mahler symphony performed live? Do you know how long Beethoven's op. 111, 2nd mvt is? Are you familiar with the Goldberg variations? What about the Diabelli variations? The Eroica variations (for piano)?
When you've heard Schubert D 959, 4th mvt played with complete serenity and sensitivity, believe me, you will NEVER want the piece to end.
howdilydoodily 2 years ago
Once again, YouTube listeners refuse to read what I actually write! I said: "overlong AND RAMBLING." I would hardly classify the Beethoven 9th or any of the other pieces you mention as "rambling," as they all hold my interest from beginning to end and the Variation form happens to be one of my personal favorites,
billyguns2 2 years ago
billyguns-
Then that's just it. You say you love the variation form, yet Bach only wrote in that form once for a reason, and one could easily say the Diabelli & Eroica variations seem to go on and on (I don't), but the fact is there's more development in a Schubert sonata than in anyone's variations. The argument is you conveniently ignore the same qualities in Beethoven's 9th--with the endless 4th movement--that's in Schubert.
It's a tired response, and frankly ignorant, regarding Schubert.
howdilydoodily 2 years ago
There is no need to be insulting; that is a tired reponse from someone who has nothing of value to say. By the way, I am a highly sought after professional musician who probably knows more about music than you ever will. I like what I like, you like what you like and let's just leav eit at that. I find that most YouTube commentators are self righteous know it alls that brook no other opinion except their own.
billyguns2 2 years ago
Clear, unassuming performance allowing Schubert to be heard without a tinge of unwarranted sentimentalism. Just brilliant!
werewethere 2 years ago
Best Schubert ever!!!
Even more better than the Schubert could be!!!
BubbaFrench 2 years ago
MIchelangeli can do no wrong, but here he comes close :)
jwthomas777 2 years ago
Well, as always with Michelangeli, it's not boring. Pulse and "puncturing" of notes makes this piece sounding closer to fi. cm. von Weber then I earlier noticed.
Thanks for uploading!
Greetings, Rolf
You can find me on Twitter as @otterhouse
otterhouse 2 years ago
well...Schubert?!?
aintyourlilac 2 years ago
Who knows what 'Schubert' would have wanted and who cares.Of course,you are very right to suggest however that this performance style is a whimsical Arte-Deco one.Certainly Not possible for a likely interpretive approach contemporary to Schubert or even fifty years after...as it deletes too many dimensions of articulation and rhythm
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
For me, this performance depicts a dollhouse, which interestingly is also what Richter's interpretation of Schubert reminds me of.
aintyouroseither 2 years ago
Comment removed
frederickfrederikfre 2 years ago
ssssshhhhh.... be quiet, my friends. this is not human...
iperuranioangela 2 years ago 6
very nice...
kempff95 2 years ago
My God.
What a perfection.
try to find some Paradisi play by him.
Tell Brendel to listen this to learn how to play Schubert........
lokopiano
lokopiano 2 years ago 3
Ogni volta che lo sento, Michelangeli mi emoziona tantissimo!
Gabry950 2 years ago 4
Grazie Maestro....
GBV1961 2 years ago 3
Thank you for posting this...it's actually broadcasted on SKY CLASSICA these days...now I can see and listen to it every time I want.
peterhammill 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't remember the amount of notes as he does nor do I gain income from a professional career as a pianist. I do think that this is tired performance and one that does not seem to have much life about it. The Steinway sound is there though.
nantong 3 years ago
Comment removed
frederickfrederikfre 3 years ago
Pero es que este hombre lo toca todo magnificamente...no he visto un pianista mas completo...excepcional¡
laqullu 3 years ago 2
Please putt part 1 and 3?!?!
Makomp1234 3 years ago 2
totally a monster.. he lived in another dimension. a genius. pure genius. sensitivness tecnique, magic...great.
gaspgaspla 3 years ago 6
MAGNIFIQUE !
NOKADIWA 3 years ago
adorably charming :)
jazaleax 3 years ago
Here HE is!!! the GOLD MASTER!!! listen what he makes out of this simple piece: touch & sound beauty+feeling= ART. M.Uchida is a great pianist,but listen to the same piece she plays and then tell me if this is not a quite DIEFFERENT WORLD
pianofolle 3 years ago
Or listen to the Beethoven concertos and compare Brendel with Michelangeli. It´s unbelievable! Never heard a better pianist -
anonymusum 3 years ago
Are you saying Brendel is better? As much as I love Brendel's Schubert and Beethoven performances, I have to say ABM was a master,
Toxxic88 3 years ago 4
I didn´t express it properly - sorry. I wanted to say that Michelangeli is a far better pianist than Brendel. His recordings will always be treasures in my collection (right aside Carlos Kleiber).
anonymusum 3 years ago 4
While Mitsuko isn't the technician that Michelangeli was, she isn't a lesser musician. However, with regards to this piece, ABM owns D. 537.
Pogouldiwitz 2 years ago
Listen everyone,nobody can judge a master,,
sexypianista 3 years ago 2
You realize that calling someone "a master" is a form of judgement, right? :)
javacisnotrecognized 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No,it's not. a judgement is made at least by a subject, a verb and a predicate(to javacis)
pianofolle 3 years ago
If you've called someone "a master", you must at least have had in your head some such sentence as: He (subject) is (verb) a master (predicate). So what's your point?
Rik274 3 years ago
P.S. the previous remark is addressed to pianofolle's last comment but one.
Rik274 3 years ago
Wondrous--The music never touches the ground.
ipmoic 3 years ago 2
I know that everybody some of you are not going to agree with me I think that this is perfect but boring. And again I admire Michelangeli in many other redentions.
galapz 3 years ago
this sonata ist not the best of all schubert sonatas and this mouvement hasnt to say much so it seems boring,but the way he plays is also here outstanding and very singular! - wanna say:composition a sort of boring,interpretation as well.
kajohada 3 years ago
he plays this way too stiff in my opinion, there used to be a remarkable rendition by a pianist named plamena mangova, she really played it with feeling and a good attitude...
plantluver9 3 years ago
Thanks for pointing out Mangova's rendition. It is very lovely indeed. However, it is 3 minutes shorter than this one. She achieves an effect which is more pleasing to our modern ears by using much more damper and rubato. This version, which depends on what to us sound like very small chnages in dynamics is much closer to what was possible on a fortepiano -- Shubert's instrument. To appreciate this, you have to adjust your ear to the lesser dynamic range, like listening to Bach on a clavichord.
NosHabebitHumus 3 years ago
Oh Plamena Mangova was in my class :D
godelike 3 years ago
MERCI !
Lillars 3 years ago
pianista grande! - awesome how he uses playing the piano.
kajohada 4 years ago
Magnificent playing!TY
paulostroff99 4 years ago
Excellent!
Thanks for posting!
Laura
Lauretta73 4 years ago