Pantone Eye-One Display 2 vs. Spyder 2 Pro

[47060588]

If you want know about the product visit eyeonedisplay2 . c o m

The review, features and video instruction.

[1NutWhoreBitOffMyNut]

This test is completely useless, you ONLY tested the software here, these timed tests have NOTHING to do with the colourmeter themselfs. I use a Spyder2Pro Studio package and only kept the Spyder2 and use it with Spectraview 2 and my NEC 2490WUXi. Spectraview 2 is a lot faster than anything provided with my original package and of course so much more accurate and directly stores LUT.

[dougsweetspot]

You useless Ozzy ass (Aaaye Naaaye! ) . I have the Eye One, yet you did absolutely NOTHING other than run both calibration tools in easy mode which in its self is as useless as you are.

[bobbob01234567]

STUPID USELESS VIDEO.

[migo33]

Don't get the point of this Vid.

I should post a video comparing your old fashioned website design and content (yes there are pages with content going back to the beginning of the century) to a well better website. it takes me half the time to browse and get to my point of interest on a good designed website.

[StarburstPhotography]

well...you have to admit....might be a bit of an advantage having a slower system.

For example, that guy using the spider can go fuck himself for twice as long as the poor cunt that used the pantone.

[h2oextremepcs]

What a waste of time, just trying to sell more stuff from his website

[bfield3]

So you're saying because the Eye-One is faster it's better? You need to re-vamp this video and either state something about the quality achieved by both devices or specifically state it is only a speed test.

[scu1ptures]

what a waste of time.

one calibrator is *not* necessarily better than another,

just because it is quicker.

Quick hint...

if you are going to compare 2 products..

at least chose parameters that the public will be interested in!

you might as well have been comparing the colours

on the packaging of each item, for all the good this video was.

[Flygvapnet]

yep! waster of time.... -.-

[prmass1]

I don't mind waiting 10 minutes more. Heck! I can make me some eggs and bacon while its done. Also a glass of fine wine.

[InSaneTK]

Speed is no substitute for quality.

[click4nat]

I don't care if it would take two hours as long as the result was accurate.

[haha48]

@click4nat hehe I use a nec lcd calibrator.. and eyeone software.. which is free for moniters... and it works great.. its much faster then eyeone by it self..

[callmechaz51]

Like togalogs I believe color adjustment is the ultimate goal here. To dismiss the end result of the product's color management abilities is a waste of time. I rate this video low.

Both products rate high but Spyder is inconsistent. Third party ColorEyes software company won't support it, for that reason. And it does not handle highlights well (ie. weddings), although shadow detail is superb. Spyder has more features. EyeOne is faster and more user friendly. Monaco Optix Pro has it all.

[togalogs]

Who cares how long they take, its only the results that matter, especially when it comes to accurate colour.

[wesleynicholls]

I am into print design and I need a color calibrator for my monitor I am tired of surprises.

[px505]

you're doing something wrong, never took me near 20 minutes for the calibration

[itreeye]

I got the Spyder but found *it does not work* with my Dell 9400. I had to return and bought the EyeOne, which works fine.