The planets actually do behave like the electron. First you need to speed up the rotation of the planets. if you and i were standing on an electron, we wouldnt be orbiting wildly; Time is perceptual. Secondly our solar system is tame, this is true but a different system closer to the galactic core might have wild orbits due to stars being closer. now watch that system in "fast foward"
it might well be, the sun being the nucleus the planets and debris is the electron cloud. our sun combines with others to make up the galaxy. Im not saying it is an atom, but it has atomesque properties
Im not saying its 100% alike, all im saying is everything is part of something else. Our planet is part of the solar system. The solar system is part of the galaxy, the galaxies combined make up something else. That something else makes up yet another larger body, onward to infinity.
If u really think about it, an irregular galaxy is more like an atom.
Cloud of stars - cloud of electrons
a dense nucleus that can fuse when colliding with another nucleus and become more dense - A dense blackhole that can fuse when it collides with another blackhole and becomes more dense.
Electrons blink in and out of existence - Stars blink in and out of existence.
a planet can maintain same the energy as it rotates a star...it will not lose its enegry and hit the star. an electron in an atom is no held by gravity...its a eletric force..and a electron wizzing around like that radiates away its enegry..which would mean it will hit the nucleus..but does not. clearly this should be the first indication that ur picture is wrong.
like i said previously, its not 100% alike but is eerily similar. i believe in universes within universes. The more things change the more they fundamentally stay the same.
The planets actually do behave like the electron. First you need to speed up the rotation of the planets. if you and i were standing on an electron, we wouldnt be orbiting wildly; Time is perceptual. Secondly our solar system is tame, this is true but a different system closer to the galactic core might have wild orbits due to stars being closer. now watch that system in "fast foward"
ORACLE063 3 years ago
Comment removed
betterversionn 3 years ago
it might well be, the sun being the nucleus the planets and debris is the electron cloud. our sun combines with others to make up the galaxy. Im not saying it is an atom, but it has atomesque properties
ORACLE063 3 years ago
what u just said is wrong - and its called the Bohr model. do want me to englighten u?
independence8 3 years ago
Im not saying its 100% alike, all im saying is everything is part of something else. Our planet is part of the solar system. The solar system is part of the galaxy, the galaxies combined make up something else. That something else makes up yet another larger body, onward to infinity.
ORACLE063 3 years ago
If u really think about it, an irregular galaxy is more like an atom.
Cloud of stars - cloud of electrons
a dense nucleus that can fuse when colliding with another nucleus and become more dense - A dense blackhole that can fuse when it collides with another blackhole and becomes more dense.
Electrons blink in and out of existence - Stars blink in and out of existence.
ORACLE063 3 years ago
a planet can maintain same the energy as it rotates a star...it will not lose its enegry and hit the star. an electron in an atom is no held by gravity...its a eletric force..and a electron wizzing around like that radiates away its enegry..which would mean it will hit the nucleus..but does not. clearly this should be the first indication that ur picture is wrong.
independence8 3 years ago
like i said previously, its not 100% alike but is eerily similar. i believe in universes within universes. The more things change the more they fundamentally stay the same.
ORACLE063 3 years ago