Verrazano-Narrows Bridge Simulation 2

[purplehatcult]

I dont understand why the media would have to fake 911 footage... Granted a lot of people think the planes were fake, I personally dont but i respect other's rights to think that. But this is after the planes when the buildings were already on fire. If the buildings really were on fire why fake footage of the burning?

[muzicmaker2001]

Here's two clips of how far the Verrazano Bridge is in relation to the NYC skyline. The bridge is about 7 miles away!! Much further than your animation.

watch?v=NnLlXLupA9Y

watch?v=TGANEqXcGJg&feature=re­lated

[chrysaor911]

Interesting video peanut ....but please examine real footage taken from the top of the wtc...see 9/11 Fake TV - a Bridge too far on utube

[CNN911Fakes]

Camera is not far enough back compared to the fake 911 camera positions.

In my opinion. I have not studied this!

[PollenB]

Dont bother it's bogus! Just like the 9/11 tv footage in fact! Same animation kit was used! Moving 5 degress to the right does not cause the background to rotate 30 degrees to the left!

[CNN911Fakes]

I am working on a great one in that issue.

Need to find the BSRevolution one that shows the actor in NY with NY rotating around him as he gesticulates wildly. Love to know when and by whom it was aired.

Thanks all for new research, support and encouragement!

[greatbenwa]

I agree

[PollenB]

More specifically, I should have said the horizon not background. Absent from all 9/11 footage because we got a filmstudio background or computer sim or both overlaid. IMO.

[neomp5]

that's because the camera was moving to the LEFT, genius.

[PollenB]

What cave did you crawl out of?

[neomp5]

you said the camera moved to the right. it did not. it panned to the right while moving to the left. it circled clockwise around the towers in a helicopter. go outside and find a tree or something. walk around it to your left while looking at it. the background will appear to move to your left.

[PollenB]

Who said the camera anything?? Go outside yourself, and see if the horizon rotates twice the amount as you walk around a tree or something!

[neomp5]

if the objct in the background is twice the distance from the tree as i am, it certainly will move twice as much.

[PollenB]

Wrong. It will move half as much -if at all depending on distance. The bridge was 7 miles away! Ever been on a train? Things beside you whizz past, objects in the distance harldy move!

[neomp5]

i guess you've never been on a train, because when you look outside at a power pole by the tracks and focus on it as you go past it, the horizon seemingly whizzes past the pole even faster than the train.

it's all about what you're focusing on.

[PollenB]

Hahahaha. Please come back when you grow up!

[neomp5]

and when facts fail you, you can only resort to insults.

looking at a stationary object while you are moving is the same as looking at a moving object while you are stationary. in both cases, the background appears to move very quickly.

the very video you are commenting on demonstrates this effect. what part are you not understanding?

[PollenB]

No I cant be arsed talking to someone who has never been outside in the real world!

[neomp5]

more insults.

look at this very video. all it contains is a model of the city and a camera movement. do you really think it's going to look completely different from any other such movement?

you are passing the point where you can honestly be mistaken about this. you're entering the realm of lying. that's what it's called when someone says something they know to be untrue.

[PollenB]

A model, which rotates on a small plain compared to the horizon. And for your information, you started with the insults in your first post. You are one of those annoying arseholes aren't you? Just argue forever. Go outside and look you fucking dipshit! Dont annoy me with any more of your stupidity. I wont be replying!

[neomp5]

you're claiming the guy who made this simulation actually made one part of the city model move differently than the rest? it's just a camera movement.

/watch?v=NO5qvzMX-bc

[YougeneDebs]

Yes, your towers are too short. Also, Governor's Island is more prominent in real life; it is the land mass directly 'behind' the towers at 1:39 in watch?v=0P8V1aTllUE The bridge connects the southern parts of Long Island with Staten Island and should be WAY in the background. Thanks for your help.

[rustyglock212]

But you can't see the westside of the buildings like in this video. And...the other video is zooming out.

[torttuli]

It doesnt matter for fucks sake. The point is, bridge is amazingly moving omg! :OO

[greatbenwa]

the bridge is 6 miles away and by looking at how short YOUR towers are, I am not sure how correct your simulation is all together.

[parrot201]

the towers in this sim r much too small. trust me ive been to the wtc many times.