The history books will look back on these two men, Burt Rutan and Sir Richard Branson, and tell a tale that rivals most pioneering stories; the story of space flight and how long it took to finally privatize the exploration of space. These moments, people, are the moments of true historical value. Events that will revolutionize society and mankind as a whole.
@crystalidx We have absolutely no idea how to generate gravity or anti-gravity without extremely large amounts of mass. I doubt the force of gravity will be used as a propulsion method within the next few centuries.
@wrylie188 Dude, we live in a world of illusion, lies and manipulation. Your perception of reality has been molded by daily use of mainstream media and public social interaction. This illusion has been created by professionals. Your exactly the way the goverments want you to be, in a trap. Many ex-military, goverment, airline, scientific personels have already come forward and proved that anti-gravity is very practical and real. Search ""the disclosure project" and "Dr. Steven Greer."
@crystalidx The Disclosur Project is a joke. I understand the idea, and I think their intentions are good, but they don't have any outstanding evidence or facts that can't be explained by conventional science without including government plots, UFO's, or some "new world order". And you have to realise, UFO does no mean alien spacecraft or little green men. It could be any kind of falling space debri, unregistered civilian aircraft, gliders, etc.
@wrylie188 Of course not all UFOs are alienships. When people say UFOs, they don't mean Unidentified Flying Object, they mean an alien spacecraft. Its a slang or an expression. You should be knowing this by now showing that you did research.
@wrylie188 The reason why people chose to call them "UFOs" instead of alien spacecraft are because fear of being ridiculed. Dr. Steven Greer in a lecture states that UFO, unidentified flying object, was a term created by a group in relationship to the goverment in the 1950s. It is a widely misconcepted term as these objects (refering to aliencraft) are not flying (like airplanes do) but floating or hovering as they do not have any aerodynamic pulpusions. Always remember, think beyond the public!
Of or relating to aviation: a flying time of three hours between cities.
Capable of or engaged in flight: The bat is a flying mammal.
Situated, extending, or functioning in the air: a flying deck.
But by your idea of "flying" A hot air balloon does not fly. Remember, Flying does not simply mean lift created by wings. For instance, ornithopters gain a good deal of their lift by forcing air downward, as do the majority of helicopters.
@crystalidx If you would kindly give me a link to the article on this: "Very pactical and real" anti-gravity, I'd be more willing to listen to you and your ideas, becaue insofar they have little basis in actual science.
@wrylie188 I highly appreciate your openness towards something you are very doubtful. Not much people have this ablity. Here's a source: Go search "AlienScientist channel," a majority of his videos are about anti-gravity and electrogravitic technology that have personal accounts from corporational employees and much more.
to carry the weight of the turbines all the way from 40,000 feet to over 500,00 wold mean a much bigger rocket and a bigger ship to contain the fuel for the jet. and drive to cost of the system up by 10X. The system is very efficient don't load it up with bells and whistles.
@jizzmonger a modest first step that you can use to work out all the kinks to a later system that can put people and cargo into orbit. Think of it like a baby that is just starting out in life and it growing, learning and has yet to reach its full potential.
Also, if you can make a few dollars with suborbital trips more power to Virgin
We already know how to go to Space. This is a waste of money and resources that could be used to power rockets that actually serve a useful purpose and FORWARD mans desire to travel deeper into space rather than hold him back.
@jizzmonger But thi can get you into space for cheaper, and it's more environmentally friendly. Don't worry, they're working on deep-space ships as well.
@jizzmonger lulz, well they are companies and corporations, what do you expect? But the important thing is that after the commercial space line industry grows more popular, other companies will join in, and competition will beat the price down to mere several thousand, allowing extraordinary access for scientests to conduct thier experiments without spending millions of dollars for a ticket on a shuttle.
@jizzmonger Thats just the thing, it starts here. by 2020, Virgin Galactic and other aspiring spaceline companies are planning to have ships with the ability to achieve orbit, have several orbital space stations, and have bases on the moon. By 2025, they plan to have several bases on mars, and even on asteroids. And i know the "space plane" does not achieve orbit. Technology advances.
@wrylie188 It takes 100 times as much energy to reach the lowest point at which an aircraft can orbit as this "Spaceplane" currently uses on one trip.
Do you suppose actually achieving orbit will affect the cost of the ride and bring it more in line with existing programs that can achieve LEO?
@jizzmonger Check your facts. It was formerly 100 times, now its closer to about 70 times, and getting lower all the time. Think how far and how fast technology has advanced from the 1990's. by 2025, space travel could likely be as commonplace as the airline industry is today.
@jizzmonger No, my god. Well, as your name suggested from the beginning, I didn't expect your intelligence to be outstanding. Essentialy, what I mean is that it used to be 100 times as much energy required to reach orbit, now its 70 times, the progress of technology took a very short amout of time to occur. It will be a very short time before it is practical to launch daily space missions.
@jizzmonger and also: You don't measure the power of a rocket-powered space plane capable of achieving mach 3 and escaping the atmoshphere in horsepower. It's an insult to the machinery.
@Goofyfoot10 This is not a big deal. Honestly. The damned thing goes 6000 km/h with a solid fuel motor. It doesn't get into orbit. It just gets to the edge of the atmosphere and imediately falls back. Nothing more. It took some money to get there, not a lot really and there is no other purpose to this other than just getting millionares to see the earth from space. this os ONE of the elements of rubbish that we are obessing over.
The history books will look back on these two men, Burt Rutan and Sir Richard Branson, and tell a tale that rivals most pioneering stories; the story of space flight and how long it took to finally privatize the exploration of space. These moments, people, are the moments of true historical value. Events that will revolutionize society and mankind as a whole.
JetMech72 1 month ago
If only more rich people did cool stuff like this...
triforcelink 4 months ago
the age of space as begun!!!
Sandrine1o1 1 year ago 3
It would be very cool if they actually used it as means of trans-oceanic transportation... it would take much less to travel
ilion12345 1 year ago
The X-20 Dyno-soar has returned! It's the sixties all over again! lol
greenseaships 1 year ago
Richard Branson is as close to Howard Hughes as the world now has.
He's just a SANE version.
greenseaships 1 year ago
when will this one fly, and can we get to watch it land for free?
datzfast 1 year ago
w ww . theorionconspiracy .c om
VVUULDTUURRM 1 year ago
The three guys eho are looking at the ships look more like swedish people. I think this is a video from sweden :P
cappermeh 1 year ago
I betcha he's Batman
bammagamma 1 year ago
"and Captain!" .."It's The Enterprise!" :)
Biz hundert un tsvantsik!
MissAdolphHitler1988 1 year ago
Awesome... great work!
sinshine1985 1 year ago
Near future space travel = anti-gravity propulsion
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx We have absolutely no idea how to generate gravity or anti-gravity without extremely large amounts of mass. I doubt the force of gravity will be used as a propulsion method within the next few centuries.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Yeah we do, its just locked up in the goverment top secret vaults and used by shadow goverment.
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx Ok, sure buddy. Why don't you let the nice men in the whitecoats handle the computer from now on.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Dude, we live in a world of illusion, lies and manipulation. Your perception of reality has been molded by daily use of mainstream media and public social interaction. This illusion has been created by professionals. Your exactly the way the goverments want you to be, in a trap. Many ex-military, goverment, airline, scientific personels have already come forward and proved that anti-gravity is very practical and real. Search ""the disclosure project" and "Dr. Steven Greer."
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx The Disclosur Project is a joke. I understand the idea, and I think their intentions are good, but they don't have any outstanding evidence or facts that can't be explained by conventional science without including government plots, UFO's, or some "new world order". And you have to realise, UFO does no mean alien spacecraft or little green men. It could be any kind of falling space debri, unregistered civilian aircraft, gliders, etc.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Maybe Branson's "long blonde locks" have the energy density necessary to power the ship?
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger LOLZORS
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Of course not all UFOs are alienships. When people say UFOs, they don't mean Unidentified Flying Object, they mean an alien spacecraft. Its a slang or an expression. You should be knowing this by now showing that you did research.
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx why not call them alien spacecraft?
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 The reason why people chose to call them "UFOs" instead of alien spacecraft are because fear of being ridiculed. Dr. Steven Greer in a lecture states that UFO, unidentified flying object, was a term created by a group in relationship to the goverment in the 1950s. It is a widely misconcepted term as these objects (refering to aliencraft) are not flying (like airplanes do) but floating or hovering as they do not have any aerodynamic pulpusions. Always remember, think beyond the public!
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx fly·ing (flng) KEY
ADJECTIVE:
Of or relating to aviation: a flying time of three hours between cities.
Capable of or engaged in flight: The bat is a flying mammal.
Situated, extending, or functioning in the air: a flying deck.
But by your idea of "flying" A hot air balloon does not fly. Remember, Flying does not simply mean lift created by wings. For instance, ornithopters gain a good deal of their lift by forcing air downward, as do the majority of helicopters.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Actually my usuage of "flying" was referring to only means of air for the motion above a surface, not such helicopters or so.
crystalidx 1 year ago
@crystalidx If you would kindly give me a link to the article on this: "Very pactical and real" anti-gravity, I'd be more willing to listen to you and your ideas, becaue insofar they have little basis in actual science.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 I highly appreciate your openness towards something you are very doubtful. Not much people have this ablity. Here's a source: Go search "AlienScientist channel," a majority of his videos are about anti-gravity and electrogravitic technology that have personal accounts from corporational employees and much more.
crystalidx 1 year ago
It looks like an advanced, modern version of the p38 lightning lol.. Awesome though, wouldn't mind having a ride in one of those!
StefBasson 1 year ago
Sweet nose art.
Etaukan 1 year ago
would have taken the government 20 years and $50 billion to do the same thing. Awesome job!
opiewan81 1 year ago
Now THAT is a SpaceShip!
Congratulations to the Scaled Team!
Gort54 2 years ago
not yet look like a space ship. Why not Make USS Enterprise NCC 1701-D
iryan74656 2 years ago
@iryan74656
...or Enterprise NX-01
157GOLIATH 2 years ago
why won't they just put jets turbines and rocket boosters all together?
ja0129 2 years ago
to carry the weight of the turbines all the way from 40,000 feet to over 500,00 wold mean a much bigger rocket and a bigger ship to contain the fuel for the jet. and drive to cost of the system up by 10X. The system is very efficient don't load it up with bells and whistles.
cupera1 2 years ago 4
yeah, thats true, it will double the weight of the ship.
ja0129 2 years ago
@cupera1
In other words the craft is completely useless other than as a rich boy play toy.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger a modest first step that you can use to work out all the kinks to a later system that can put people and cargo into orbit. Think of it like a baby that is just starting out in life and it growing, learning and has yet to reach its full potential.
Also, if you can make a few dollars with suborbital trips more power to Virgin
cupera1 1 year ago
@cupera1
We already know how to go to Space. This is a waste of money and resources that could be used to power rockets that actually serve a useful purpose and FORWARD mans desire to travel deeper into space rather than hold him back.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger But thi can get you into space for cheaper, and it's more environmentally friendly. Don't worry, they're working on deep-space ships as well.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 What purpose does going into the Troposphere serve?
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Profit.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 Sounds like a Noble goal and something that has never been attempted before.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger lulz, well they are companies and corporations, what do you expect? But the important thing is that after the commercial space line industry grows more popular, other companies will join in, and competition will beat the price down to mere several thousand, allowing extraordinary access for scientests to conduct thier experiments without spending millions of dollars for a ticket on a shuttle.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 What experiments do you suppose they can do without going into Orbit and only going there for 5 seconds?
(the above "space plane" does not achieve orbit)
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Thats just the thing, it starts here. by 2020, Virgin Galactic and other aspiring spaceline companies are planning to have ships with the ability to achieve orbit, have several orbital space stations, and have bases on the moon. By 2025, they plan to have several bases on mars, and even on asteroids. And i know the "space plane" does not achieve orbit. Technology advances.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 It takes 100 times as much energy to reach the lowest point at which an aircraft can orbit as this "Spaceplane" currently uses on one trip.
Do you suppose actually achieving orbit will affect the cost of the ride and bring it more in line with existing programs that can achieve LEO?
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Check your facts. It was formerly 100 times, now its closer to about 70 times, and getting lower all the time. Think how far and how fast technology has advanced from the 1990's. by 2025, space travel could likely be as commonplace as the airline industry is today.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 So this aircraft would need 70 times it's current fuel capacity and horsepower to achieve the lowest LEO.
Do you think that might affect the price?
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger No, my god. Well, as your name suggested from the beginning, I didn't expect your intelligence to be outstanding. Essentialy, what I mean is that it used to be 100 times as much energy required to reach orbit, now its 70 times, the progress of technology took a very short amout of time to occur. It will be a very short time before it is practical to launch daily space missions.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 No it won't. They will fail or require taxpayer subsidies just as they do now.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Well, you're entitled to your opinion, but I'll choose to believe the scientests/futurists/mechanics/etc.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@jizzmonger and also: You don't measure the power of a rocket-powered space plane capable of achieving mach 3 and escaping the atmoshphere in horsepower. It's an insult to the machinery.
wrylie188 1 year ago
@wrylie188 I didn't realize you were an engineer. Would you like me to rate them in Gigajoules?
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Lulz
wrylie188 1 year ago
i would love to be apart of the project
KintambosVideoBlog 2 years ago
Comment removed
techraan 2 years ago
If this doesn't give Boeing and Airbus the kick in the pants they need to develop their own sub orbital airliners, I don't know what else will.
boomshanka 2 years ago 3
Gives me hope for Humanity. We can be an awful beast, but sometimes, we can be like this.
SailorBarsoom 2 years ago 2
Gods invent virus'
scientists invent cures
Go science!
buckfushes 2 years ago
...and quietly, hidden among the cacophony of rubbish that our society is busy obsessing about, real progress is made, and a new age begins.
Goofyfoot10 2 years ago 27
Exactly. This is the stuff that really matters not the next Real World or Tila Tequila.
henik9 2 years ago 16
Everything else in our world is getting worse or more expensive. Except for technology. and Science
endocondor 2 years ago 2
@Goofyfoot10 the type of age you are talking about already happened in the 1950s. space travel was easily accessible back then.
crystalidx 1 year ago
@Goofyfoot10 This is not a big deal. Honestly. The damned thing goes 6000 km/h with a solid fuel motor. It doesn't get into orbit. It just gets to the edge of the atmosphere and imediately falls back. Nothing more. It took some money to get there, not a lot really and there is no other purpose to this other than just getting millionares to see the earth from space. this os ONE of the elements of rubbish that we are obessing over.
gmanzeroalpha 1 year ago