peter schiff is hilarious. He needs to get more national tv exposure on fox etc. bc he can articulate economics with funny and clever analogies even better than the Paul's.
Fundamentally, what we need to talk about in debates is getting back to the constitutional mandate of using sound currency like gold or silver. Perhaps in future debates Peter can educate and persuade the audience that the country needs to get back to the constitution on this matter. Sound money prevents inflation, which if you are the the working poor it really matters with keeping general prices as low as possible. The current economic model of Keynes does the opposite and inflates naturally.
Schiff should easily win, he has money coming in from all over the US to run in a small state of conneticut. People support him and his message around the nation.
p.s. someone tell him to not rock back and forth so much like he did at the end, but other than that he did great
Do a quick Google search on Linda McMahon. She is an extremely low class individual. Moreover, she also contributed $7,800 to Rahm Emanuel's Political Action Committee.
Were they chanting "Peter, Peter, Peter" at the end? Because that was badass and he deserved it! I think if the people of Connecticut are paying attention and have seen Peter on TV, he has, at least, an 80% chance of winning. GO PETER!
@Pepsifx357 It's not us we need to worry about.... It's the 80 year olds who do not watch every video clip of him in proper context on youtube that we need to worry about...
Peter often says "only when consumers start saving can business start investing and start hiring "
Why does it follow that if people save,business' will invest ? thx
as i side note schiff will be a regular on fast money twice a week tuesday and thursday from 5pm EST THIS IS GREAT NEWS;;;and my fast money is that ratrings on these shows will explode...it's a smart move by CNBC and well deserved for Schiff. If only they had done it sooner!
Well, Linda has experience in ass kicking from WWE and I think it's great she is running a self-financed campaign. " And yes, now you can clap." They were clapping for Schiff and he tried to make it seem as though they were just applauding for all three. If Schiff had gone 1st or 2nd they still would have clapped after he finished.
It's not that the 2 on the right side of the stage said anything wrong, it's that they seem stiff, coached and old. Peter is fresh, real and young. He doesn't talk down to you. He doesn't insult your intelligence, he says it like it is and most importantly, he believes in the freedoms guaranteed by our beloved Constitution. He loves FREEDOM. I hope the people of CT can see that. GO PETER!!!
The 2 politicians uses emotional and semi-intellectual statements. Peter Schiff uses straight forward knowledge, logic, realistic intellectual honesty, and brutal frankness. Unfortunately it is the American Public has been dumbed down and brainwashed to understand reality, they wanted instant results as if it were like instant coffee while denying the realistic facts that it'll take decades and generations to fix the problems and that it will be our grandchildren that we must study and work for.
Listen PS fans, this was only the first shot fired. He'll pick up the pace as he gets more comfortable in these settings. Remember, he's not a career politician so it's normal to get a bit nervous at first. He'll come out much stronger as he covers more of the publics questions. No doubt, he was the only one who sounded unique and fresh, so the people will respond to a commonsense candidate, and Peter is surely on his way to the nomination... Good job Peter!
No. Are you? I've been following Peter for quite some time now and to me his performance in this debate was unlike him. Why the hell do you care about Democratic infiltrators for anyway? I'd be more concerned about Rino's and neo-cons.
PS is the only canidate that seems to get the fact that the US is in dire finacial straights! Most Americans want ALL of our fellow Americans to be "OK" healthy, and prosperous, but the FACT is we cannot support everyone! We have to get on our feet financially FIRST, before charitable actions can take place from the Federal Gov. Sorry, that's the way it is! Schiff has some fire, where the other canidates sound like the "same ol-same ol"
Peter Schiff is the only one who will stand up for limited government. The other two will say what they need to say to get elected and then govern as democrats.
McMahon and Simmons poop out their disingenuous robot scripts while Peter Schiff speaks frankly and intelligently. How anyone can be convinced that Simmons and McMahon are viable candidates with Schiff in the running is beyond me. The do not possess the competencies that Schiff does or the economic understanding necessary to wake the succubus horde in Washington from their intellectual and moral slumber.
I think Mcmahon is genuinely interested in changing domestic policy its just that a lot of people who call them selves small gov conservatives on the domestic front are really bif WARFARE state advocates. They dont see that welfare and warfare are the same thing. This is mcmahons flaw to me. But it may be schiffs downfall b/c he has to convince the reps out there and alot of dems that we have to get out of all the nations we are in
He should speak directly to what he is going to do. What is he going to cut? If he told them the truth they would reject it possibly, but at least the ideas would be out there.
Even as a fan of Peter, I thought that--at least until the very end--it was largely a dead heat. Simmons and McMahon, judged solely on presentation, each had something distinctive to offer that Peter didn't: a track record of distinguished service, and an empathetic and attuned ear. They also talked about themselves more, whereas Peter talked the issues straight.
However, Peter finished superbly. He will linger in the minds of viewers and listeners. Was that final cheer mostly for him?
It's going to be a long uphill battle to restore our constitutional republic, so I hope Americans are waking up to the fact that we need people like Schiff leading that battle.
1953 Iranian coup détat was the overthrow of the democratically-elected Iranian government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh by the Central Intelligence Agency [...] and is thought to have influenced "all of subsequent Iranian history." The coup was originally considered in America to be a triumph of Cold War covert action, but given its blowback, it is considered now generally to have left "a haunting and terrible legacy," both in Iran and worldwide
@Voy2378 - I did catch that, and was quite shocked to hear it said in such a public forum. My thoughts also went instantly to the prior coup d'etat guided by the CIA...and people wonder why their government wants to arm themselves...
Unfortunately, it was probably his only really good moment. I was disappointed with all of them though. I am a bit biased, but I think Peter won with the other guy in 2nd place and McMann in 3rd.
@CIA: Didn't they produced(faked) WMD Iraq report(that was requested by the Bush administration)? I agree that intelligence is a better way to fight terrorism, but CIA... I hate them. Ron Paul is right... Most of the USA enemies today are ex CIA's friends .
Of Peter's two opponents, I think Linda is the bigger threat. She had less substance than Peter, but she was very smooth, and she worked very hard to connect on an emotional level. (E.g., "I've been there; I know what it's like.")
This could backfire on her, of course; she could come across as insincere or condescending. But right now, I still think she's the bigger threat.
I agree, Simmons is politician but Linda is sleazy too. "I'm a mother...", "I lost my home...". It might sound good(some people might even think that she is sincere), but I hope that people will look for solutions not fake empathy(look at Obama-his teleprompter is filled with "hard choices", "hard working Americans", ...)
Although I don't think Linda really brought anything to the table, I think she played a good strategy. Peter didn't do as well as I expected. I don't even remember the others guy's name was and don't even remember nor cared what he said.
I disagree because I feel the CIA should be dismantled and brought to justice for the innumerable crimes against humanity they have committed. They are a rogue group who fund various "black ops" through their own use of cocaine and heroin sales and committ assassinations on whomever they want.
I agree, but most voters (I'm sorry) are too stupid to see through McMahon's stupidity.She's a good bullshitter,just like Obama.Her responses are very personal and emotional.That's how most voters choose their candidate, such as Obama and McCain.I've conducted exit polls and they led to a loss of faith in the average voter.The grassroots has to work really really hard to turn those simple minded sheeple into critical thinkers.
Simmons and McMahon sound like robots. They sound generic and rehearsed. Peter is the only one that speaks from conviction and knowledge. I hope the voters of Connecticut can see this.
Peter Schiff understands that to be efficient a nation or an individual must stop doing the things that prohibit efficiency. After the last 90 years of taxpayer choking and government involvement in peoples lives, it is time to repeal and limit the government.
Linda plays the crowd, people like to FEEL that's why she sounds appealing. Peter can do this too without running a smear campaign. By "attacking" the others I mean Peter should say why he's different, because he knew about the crisis before the senatorial campaign so he's not just saying he's different.
What's with the techno dance music at the end?
Airmanf7 1 week ago
Who won?
belinda2118 3 weeks ago
Who won the senate?
madridisinSpain 8 months ago
MCMahon: BLAH BLAH BLAH-PROPAGANDA-RHETORIC-PROPAGANDA-RHETORIC-BLAH BLAH BLAH
Schiff: WISDOM TRUTH INTELLIGENCE INTELLECT WISDOM TRUTH INTELLIGENCE INTELLECT
TheBlitz1 8 months ago 4
@TheBlitz1 haha
Dagonnaut 6 months ago
Lol, and he lost just the same.
Ah well, theres always next time.
tothemax01 1 year ago
They've all been SCHIFFED!
bkekss 1 year ago 5
peter schiff is hilarious. He needs to get more national tv exposure on fox etc. bc he can articulate economics with funny and clever analogies even better than the Paul's.
stoneecold23 1 year ago 2
peter win!
ourmanthejoker 1 year ago
wow Peter won throughout the debate and this final statement was SUPERB...
FLAWLESS VICTORY
peter peter peter peter!!!!
moctezuma112 1 year ago 4
Linda McMahon is an idiot
lalavny 1 year ago
schiff the the big applause, nothing for the other two
ForTehNguyen 1 year ago
Comment removed
reaglevideo 1 year ago
From what ive seen in the polls, peter wont win.
I guess people don't want someone who acually knows how the economy works.
fieldman07 1 year ago
@fieldman07 same thing goes for ron paul.
sniped101 1 year ago
Fundamentally, what we need to talk about in debates is getting back to the constitutional mandate of using sound currency like gold or silver. Perhaps in future debates Peter can educate and persuade the audience that the country needs to get back to the constitution on this matter. Sound money prevents inflation, which if you are the the working poor it really matters with keeping general prices as low as possible. The current economic model of Keynes does the opposite and inflates naturally.
MsBusiness101 1 year ago
Peter is brilliant.
Krupification 1 year ago 2
Peter Schiff is so refreshing and intelligent. Unfortunately even he can't save the US from another Great Depression.
MrSydneyKing 1 year ago 4
Peter Schiff should have just pulled out a "Stone Cold Stunner" on Linda and Mr CIA.
bluejonny007 1 year ago
Damn Educated Connecticut Folks
realguy420 1 year ago
Go Peter Schiff!
iamthewalrus5 1 year ago
I wish we have a Peter Schiff in California, I do believe that we need Austrian economist to deal with California, what we got is just an Austrian.
777silverminttown 1 year ago 9
@777silverminttown well silvermint, Arnold seems to be doing the right thing now, understanding the mess it's in with hard cuts!
kardentyrell 1 year ago
I think Peter did very well. Linda McMahon is obviously going for the 'little guy's' vote, which is a worry I think because she could a vote splitter.
And Secretbonus is right - I think Peter needs to work on keeping his body quiet while he is making his biggest points.
FunnyHedger 1 year ago
GO PETER !!!
jibbi4one 1 year ago 4
GO PETER!
ecnerwal999 1 year ago
GO PETER!
ecnerwal999 1 year ago
GO PETER!
ecnerwal999 1 year ago
Comment removed
ecnerwal999 1 year ago
This closing statement was awesome, especially the last line he delivered. Amazing.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago 2
Schiff should easily win, he has money coming in from all over the US to run in a small state of conneticut. People support him and his message around the nation.
p.s. someone tell him to not rock back and forth so much like he did at the end, but other than that he did great
secretbonus 1 year ago
Peter is the man!
vaporsun 1 year ago 2
was he not allow to plug his youtube videos? If i was him in that closing statement i would tell them to watch his videos
krillin876 1 year ago 2
Schiff is the real deal, once people start to wake up to him and the economy is even worse off Schiff will easily win that primary.
NotRadicalLogical 1 year ago
Do a quick Google search on Linda McMahon. She is an extremely low class individual. Moreover, she also contributed $7,800 to Rahm Emanuel's Political Action Committee.
sunflowersmorning 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
sunflowersmorning 1 year ago
Were they chanting "Peter, Peter, Peter" at the end? Because that was badass and he deserved it! I think if the people of Connecticut are paying attention and have seen Peter on TV, he has, at least, an 80% chance of winning. GO PETER!
Pepsifx357 1 year ago 7
@Pepsifx357 It's not us we need to worry about.... It's the 80 year olds who do not watch every video clip of him in proper context on youtube that we need to worry about...
soliloqy 1 year ago
Best closing statement ever in a debate.
GryphonsClaw 1 year ago 35
Pete won hands down!...A "no bullshit" man!
momantube 1 year ago 42
@momantube hewon the fight but he isn't going to win the war.
sniped101 1 year ago
I think Peter will easily kick the other 2 out of race
TheFinancist 2 years ago 7
It's really all about money and exposure.
I hope you're right. Online, Peter has it wrapped, but not everyone that votes frequents this medium of information.
Peter still needs our money and support and he has mine.
Luvanicebum 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
Jotrum 2 years ago
Peter Schiff for Senator!
WorldCapitalBeats 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Peter often says "only when consumers start saving can business start investing and start hiring "
Why does it follow that if people save,business' will invest ? thx
as i side note schiff will be a regular on fast money twice a week tuesday and thursday from 5pm EST THIS IS GREAT NEWS;;;and my fast money is that ratrings on these shows will explode...it's a smart move by CNBC and well deserved for Schiff. If only they had done it sooner!
MEXBOL 2 years ago
Well, Linda has experience in ass kicking from WWE and I think it's great she is running a self-financed campaign. " And yes, now you can clap." They were clapping for Schiff and he tried to make it seem as though they were just applauding for all three. If Schiff had gone 1st or 2nd they still would have clapped after he finished.
terker10 2 years ago
absolutely
i feel like moving to ct just so i can call him my senator, if he doesn't get elected then its fixed and there is no hope
WorldCapitalBeats 2 years ago 2
I guess I will have to send $5 to Schiff. He is not from my state but I share his views. Where is his address?
SidneyBou 2 years ago
PETER! PETER! PETER!
1217jesss 2 years ago 2
Peter SCHIFF!
ExhibitMan 2 years ago 2
It's not that the 2 on the right side of the stage said anything wrong, it's that they seem stiff, coached and old. Peter is fresh, real and young. He doesn't talk down to you. He doesn't insult your intelligence, he says it like it is and most importantly, he believes in the freedoms guaranteed by our beloved Constitution. He loves FREEDOM. I hope the people of CT can see that. GO PETER!!!
marshall1963 2 years ago
The 2 politicians uses emotional and semi-intellectual statements. Peter Schiff uses straight forward knowledge, logic, realistic intellectual honesty, and brutal frankness. Unfortunately it is the American Public has been dumbed down and brainwashed to understand reality, they wanted instant results as if it were like instant coffee while denying the realistic facts that it'll take decades and generations to fix the problems and that it will be our grandchildren that we must study and work for.
darthvader5300 2 years ago 2
Fighting for freedom in Vietnam?
RLY? WTF
psychawareness 2 years ago
lol right?
war is peace he was saying, what a joke!
WorldCapitalBeats 2 years ago
yep I'm pretty sure he kicked ass. They all say the same things, but Schiff is believable.
lewisfiecke 2 years ago
Did someone say change? Yes we can, Peter Schiff will rock in Washington with true change.
didymus0987 2 years ago 3
I watch so much schiff I think my wife is getting jealous
eeen85 2 years ago 8
@eeen85 He knows how to get me excited
didymus0987 2 years ago 2
Great finish by Peter but he really needs to engage his opponents on his points of difference.
PLooBzor 2 years ago 2
not really a debate, more like each giving their own speeches
4rcane 2 years ago 2
Peter Schiff's finish was very strong! Good job!
jshawsworld 2 years ago 7
Listen PS fans, this was only the first shot fired. He'll pick up the pace as he gets more comfortable in these settings. Remember, he's not a career politician so it's normal to get a bit nervous at first. He'll come out much stronger as he covers more of the publics questions. No doubt, he was the only one who sounded unique and fresh, so the people will respond to a commonsense candidate, and Peter is surely on his way to the nomination... Good job Peter!
y2ktube 2 years ago 4
Peter crushed it!
Ellipsis10 2 years ago 2
It's not a very exciting debate if they're agreeing with each other.
MishuTaste 2 years ago
@MishuTaste
I agree with you Mishu. It's like they were holding hands and singing Kumbaya. Peter needs to go on the attack....or else McMahon will win.
sluv2600 2 years ago
I'm sure those two will be "wrestling" as the primaries draw nearer.
MishuTaste 2 years ago
@sluv2600 Are you an infiltrator from the democratic party?
UncommonThinker 2 years ago
No. Are you? I've been following Peter for quite some time now and to me his performance in this debate was unlike him. Why the hell do you care about Democratic infiltrators for anyway? I'd be more concerned about Rino's and neo-cons.
sluv2600 2 years ago
@sluv2600 And what is the difference between a RINO and a Democratic infiltrator?
UncommonThinker 2 years ago 3
Peter Schiff FTW!!!
KungFuBlitzKrieg 2 years ago 3
Nice finish Peter way to go out strong
dontdispie 2 years ago 3
PS is the only canidate that seems to get the fact that the US is in dire finacial straights! Most Americans want ALL of our fellow Americans to be "OK" healthy, and prosperous, but the FACT is we cannot support everyone! We have to get on our feet financially FIRST, before charitable actions can take place from the Federal Gov. Sorry, that's the way it is! Schiff has some fire, where the other canidates sound like the "same ol-same ol"
coralmidstream 2 years ago 3
I think the State of Conneticut will be very well served regardless of the GOP pick, as long one of these three get elected
alonelychild 2 years ago
Peter Schiff is the only one who will stand up for limited government. The other two will say what they need to say to get elected and then govern as democrats.
stater68 2 years ago 6
WoW I didn't think Peter could keep his points to less than a minute. haha j/k Please vote for him people.
DeathByMullet 2 years ago 6
I was worried that schiff would blurt out and interrupt ...thats what I would have done but he was cool and utterly professional
kotash2 2 years ago 3
I wish i was in the audiance just so i could shout Peter Schiffs name near the end
NicosMind 2 years ago 5
I can see the look of defeat on their faces already...
drinkofwater21 2 years ago 2
Peter Schiff has fresh ideas and an understanding of the mess we are in.
The other two just spew the same crap that destroyed our republic.
TheMrMarple 2 years ago 4
May the spirits of Mises, Rothbard, Hayek, Bastiat and all live on.
kotash2 2 years ago 5
@kotash2
Hear hear.
NicosMind 2 years ago
McMahon and Simmons poop out their disingenuous robot scripts while Peter Schiff speaks frankly and intelligently. How anyone can be convinced that Simmons and McMahon are viable candidates with Schiff in the running is beyond me. The do not possess the competencies that Schiff does or the economic understanding necessary to wake the succubus horde in Washington from their intellectual and moral slumber.
Novadeo 2 years ago 6
I think Mcmahon is genuinely interested in changing domestic policy its just that a lot of people who call them selves small gov conservatives on the domestic front are really bif WARFARE state advocates. They dont see that welfare and warfare are the same thing. This is mcmahons flaw to me. But it may be schiffs downfall b/c he has to convince the reps out there and alot of dems that we have to get out of all the nations we are in
kotash2 2 years ago
Good Job, Peter! You left them with a strong impression.
I hope you gave them enough of a taste to want to learn more about you...for if they do, certainly they could not turn their backs.
Stay the course!!!
MrRayRPh 2 years ago
Peter's whole presentation was strong and clear. It set the scene for the electrifying zinger at the end.
Whether planned or improvised, it was brilliant and indicates that he is up to the campaigning task.
raythespian 2 years ago
He should speak directly to what he is going to do. What is he going to cut? If he told them the truth they would reject it possibly, but at least the ideas would be out there.
jpcl21 2 years ago
Even as a fan of Peter, I thought that--at least until the very end--it was largely a dead heat. Simmons and McMahon, judged solely on presentation, each had something distinctive to offer that Peter didn't: a track record of distinguished service, and an empathetic and attuned ear. They also talked about themselves more, whereas Peter talked the issues straight.
However, Peter finished superbly. He will linger in the minds of viewers and listeners. Was that final cheer mostly for him?
aidengregg 2 years ago
Peters got my vote!
YEAY CAPITALISM AND THE FREE MARKET!!!
otakudojo 2 years ago
Schiff all the way!
vegaspilot03 2 years ago
for all the people who are disappointed please bear in mind the format of this debate.
It is not a television presentation were people can just attack one other.
There was a few little sly ones here and there but on the whole it was a civilised presentation.
bighands69 2 years ago
I dont want them to attack each other personally. But I would like to see them attack each others positions.
chaseef 2 years ago
This lady is totally despicable!! She deserves to suck my cock!
rosewood223 2 years ago
It's going to be a long uphill battle to restore our constitutional republic, so I hope Americans are waking up to the fact that we need people like Schiff leading that battle.
.
kmg501 2 years ago 2
Schiff only, for sure!
knoweller 2 years ago
Great success!
BloodMech21 2 years ago
peter schiff and ron paul are honest americans.
bush, obama, clinton and mccain should be put into jail.
END THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
hyylo 2 years ago 6
I agree, although a lot of damage has been done and it will be a hard job.
BTW nobody noticed that Linda suggested that US should overthrow Iran government. It worked great in 1953. Not. Why people can't learn from history?
Voy2378 2 years ago 4
1953 Iranian coup détat was the overthrow of the democratically-elected Iranian government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh by the Central Intelligence Agency [...] and is thought to have influenced "all of subsequent Iranian history." The coup was originally considered in America to be a triumph of Cold War covert action, but given its blowback, it is considered now generally to have left "a haunting and terrible legacy," both in Iran and worldwide
Voy2378 2 years ago
@Voy2378 - I did catch that, and was quite shocked to hear it said in such a public forum. My thoughts also went instantly to the prior coup d'etat guided by the CIA...and people wonder why their government wants to arm themselves...
Nostradamus411 2 years ago
@ Nostradamus411:
Also CIA gave 5.5 billion(through FED!) to Saddam so that Iraq can fight Iran.
Don't get me wrong. I don't like Iran. I'm just saying... bully crazy people and there will be problems.
Voy2378 2 years ago
Go Schiff!
AminCad 2 years ago
Go Peter
AnisBenhayyoun 2 years ago 2
Peter's closing was outstanding.
bearcat648 2 years ago 2
Unfortunately, it was probably his only really good moment. I was disappointed with all of them though. I am a bit biased, but I think Peter won with the other guy in 2nd place and McMann in 3rd.
christo930 2 years ago
@CIA: Didn't they produced(faked) WMD Iraq report(that was requested by the Bush administration)? I agree that intelligence is a better way to fight terrorism, but CIA... I hate them. Ron Paul is right... Most of the USA enemies today are ex CIA's friends .
Voy2378 2 years ago
At 6:48 it sounds like the crowd is chanting, "PETER! PETER! PETER!"
twinsrule8907 2 years ago 3
I'm pretty sure that is what was being said. I'd be right there with them too! PETER! PETER!
AMD64EVER 2 years ago 5
half of McMahon's closing statement sounds like an add for unemployment insurence
noogie123 2 years ago 5
LOL @ the crowd chanting Peter, Peter, Peter. that was awesome! besides being kick ass smart, hes very charismatic.
efrain926 2 years ago 5
peter totally KICKED ASS in his last closing statement!!
joechien0218 2 years ago 3
Good job Peter. You had them chanting your name at the end. You must be doing something right. Keep it up and you will end up in the Senate.
WSOR4025 2 years ago 3
It's pretty obvious the other two have been watching schiff vids.did u here simmons in pt1 say something about not sueingour
way out of our problem or something like that.
eeen85 2 years ago 5
None of the candidates seem like bad choices here, but Peter is by far the best of the three.
BillySmooth55 2 years ago 4
Of Peter's two opponents, I think Linda is the bigger threat. She had less substance than Peter, but she was very smooth, and she worked very hard to connect on an emotional level. (E.g., "I've been there; I know what it's like.")
This could backfire on her, of course; she could come across as insincere or condescending. But right now, I still think she's the bigger threat.
qralston 2 years ago 2
@ qralston:
I agree, Simmons is politician but Linda is sleazy too. "I'm a mother...", "I lost my home...". It might sound good(some people might even think that she is sincere), but I hope that people will look for solutions not fake empathy(look at Obama-his teleprompter is filled with "hard choices", "hard working Americans", ...)
Voy2378 2 years ago
What! . . .
A real human being running for Senate.
LOL. thats a first.
I love how the MC gave permission to cheer after the FACT!
swiftysmithuk 2 years ago 3
Oh wow .. Peter... you own.... I don't know how much I can describe on how own you are. You win. You just win! .. WIN.... Peter FTW!...
krittmasta 2 years ago
Oh my God, Peter's closing statement was amazing! He shook the whole place up! GO PETER!
mistermayy 2 years ago 4
PETER!!! PETER!!! PETER!!!
Peter should have no problem disposing of Linda, and once he is done with her, he can square off with Vince @ WrestleMania!
samsterlok 2 years ago 2
a bit war hungry
happyrichie 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My entire economics class loves peter schiff and ron paul.
from
UK London
Lets End the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England.
hyylo 2 years ago
hyylo, i'm with ya!
tmac9938 2 years ago
God bless Peter Schiff!!!!!!!
pwoznic 2 years ago 3
Although I don't think Linda really brought anything to the table, I think she played a good strategy. Peter didn't do as well as I expected. I don't even remember the others guy's name was and don't even remember nor cared what he said.
LetsGetItStartedNow 2 years ago 2
Great candidates. Peter is the man. Here comes the dark horse.
synthman2000 2 years ago
The poll is not currently visible at the Hartford Courant.
Epic878787 2 years ago
Actually, I think McMahon was pretty good
YoniLiron 2 years ago
@YoniLiron I thought that she came across well too but would she actually push things through like peter would, I really doubt it.
titan13131 2 years ago
@yoniliron, yes McMahon spoke pretty well. but so did obama.
tmac9938 2 years ago 2
Peter is too good for the USA!
jcortez73 2 years ago 4
Volunteer for Peter Schiff if you cannot afford to donate:
schiffforsenate (dot) com/?q=get-involved
jjason1985 2 years ago 3
I disagree because I feel the CIA should be dismantled and brought to justice for the innumerable crimes against humanity they have committed. They are a rogue group who fund various "black ops" through their own use of cocaine and heroin sales and committ assassinations on whomever they want.
Gravija1980 2 years ago 9
peter peter peter!!!
nsolcis 2 years ago 8
Was the crowd saying: Peter, Peter... I'm not sure and I think that Peter is awesome so maybe I'm just hearing what i want to hear. :)
Voy2378 2 years ago 6
@Voy2378 You heard right :D
njcarlos1 2 years ago
Wow, the crowd at the end was chanting PETER PETER PETER!! Awesome job Mr. Schiff.
ufobuzz 2 years ago 11
I'd vote for Simmons, if only he'd been in the military and/or was a family man. But I guess I'll just never know.
Metric0 2 years ago 2
@Metric0 Lol well done sir.
Dabba23 2 years ago 2
@Metric0 ROFL
njcarlos1 2 years ago
McMahon and Simmons are two tools!
joe94132 2 years ago 8
Go Peter!
dheald666 2 years ago 4
That was an excellent closing for Peter. He should´ve expressed the same emotion when answerig questions...
haveabeer123 2 years ago 7
Excellent job Mr. Schiff.
n66178 2 years ago 3
we need to get peter up to 70% on fox 61's website
stater68 2 years ago 3
how? link?
shockinggenius 2 years ago
@stater68 and how do we do that/? i went to fox61 website but dont see a poll please give link thank you sir
MIT2004 2 years ago
Mcmahon was incoherent and stupid
stater68 2 years ago 4
I agree, but most voters (I'm sorry) are too stupid to see through McMahon's stupidity.She's a good bullshitter,just like Obama.Her responses are very personal and emotional.That's how most voters choose their candidate, such as Obama and McCain.I've conducted exit polls and they led to a loss of faith in the average voter.The grassroots has to work really really hard to turn those simple minded sheeple into critical thinkers.
VaticansHolocaust 2 years ago 3
That town will never be the same!! Hey did i just hear a whole crowd say PETER PETER PETER?
MIT2004 2 years ago 5
@MIT2004 Oh yes :)
tonelove14 2 years ago
Simmons and McMahon sound like robots. They sound generic and rehearsed. Peter is the only one that speaks from conviction and knowledge. I hope the voters of Connecticut can see this.
happystab 2 years ago 5
great closer peter!!!
soundmoneyfan 2 years ago 4
Does anyone know how many people have watched these debates (on TV, not youtube)?
satuon 2 years ago
Schiff Rules!!!
bizwiz21 2 years ago 7
What random luck that Schiff gets to have the last word.
It was not a good night for the McMahon and Simmons campaigns.
ric0rich 2 years ago 7
she was stealing some of schiffs lines from the past, kinda funny
ukjw2 2 years ago 3
Peter Schiff understands that to be efficient a nation or an individual must stop doing the things that prohibit efficiency. After the last 90 years of taxpayer choking and government involvement in peoples lives, it is time to repeal and limit the government.
6024691380 2 years ago
Linda plays the crowd, people like to FEEL that's why she sounds appealing. Peter can do this too without running a smear campaign. By "attacking" the others I mean Peter should say why he's different, because he knew about the crisis before the senatorial campaign so he's not just saying he's different.
KP23anda 2 years ago
does anybody know if simmons served in the military?
I would love to know what the vietnam war had to do with the bill of rights
jcanavan 2 years ago
lol he said he served in war for peace HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHAHAAH
ukjw2 2 years ago
I guess TheRepublicX was speechless or typeless after being blown away by Peters finish.
DesTroYeRuS7 2 years ago 4
Ha Ha, "and now we can applaud".
The crowd is way ahead of you buddy, someone in the room is talking sense.
Schiff 4 Senate 2010.
erushbass 2 years ago 3
Schiff was the winner clearly! The other two are just more of the same...
K46620 2 years ago
Is it common sense to spend 50 million not to be a career politician and get something for yourself? LOL
davincij15 2 years ago 3
Nice finish Peter!
Simmons should run for public office in Vietnam -- that's obviously where his concern is.
Linda might as well have white noise on every time she speaks -- nothing she said was remotely memorable.
Metric0 2 years ago 4
I like the Austrian Economist.
eurohim 2 years ago 7
"And yes, now we can applaud." Hah, they were applauding Peter's closing statement. It was awesome.
eurohim 2 years ago 4
Washington needs a unrelenting pain in the arse, Peter Schiff :)
Stuballs84 2 years ago 4