@noshimaq the basic logic of life is that out of nothing, nothing comes. he is saying, you can only know what you see. instead of thinking about life, let life impose itself onto you. experience life consciously or you will not know what you see and continue on thinking. guessing.
lets say i wanted to solve a math problem. by looking at it without solving it before i will simply not be able to solve it. i will need to think. eyes to not discover the truth about life in all its aspects, but lets us notice things and analyze it on our own way to get a meaning out of it. i love Philosophy because i like wisdom. i created my personal Philosophy and understand life in my own way. if people follow him we all will have the same way of life which is imposible.
if you replace "same way" with "similar way", your impossible go away.
There is much behind this few min. speech he gave. There is one of the most profound wisdom behind what he said... read "no water, no moon" to understand it.
wow Bruce lee said the same thing from 2:30 to 4:20. this is the link i know bruce lee says it in a movie but he said it no one told him to say it. (Finger Pointing to the Moon - Bruce Lee) from 1:16 to the end. i am trying to find other videos where bruse lee is going in to more detail about it.
As a Ph. D. in Philosphy let be say that your option is backed by nothing.
You cannot know truth, you can experience it, you can seek it, but it is outside of the human experience to know truth. And if you "know" truth and yet deny the existence of God then your denying truth, that which you claim to "know"
A man that knows, and knows that he knows, knows nothing
@truthseeker010101 speaking in terms of knowledge, yoBut this man doens't claim to know anything. His point of view comes out of accepting relativity of knowledge and "truth" and seeing the only absolute truth in raw experience.
@truthseeker010101 whit all due respect,you are trying too hard,this man doesn't try to prove or state nothing,he only says what he sees and understands.you ph. d. doesn't help you here.
@jackscrack99 yes for most things in life but not if you want to be in this state Osho is talking about..which is the opposite of thinking. Just a knowing.
If he was a follower of the Zen Buddhism, why people keep saying he had created a religion himself? I read one of his books this week and basically, all he says it's Buddhism of Mahayanna school...and If he was a so modest second what I read about his speeches, why using such flashy clothes and a collection of Rolls Royce? I mean, it's contraditory...his vision of life is extremely respectful indeed but some things do not fit, it's just like "Do what I say but don't do what I do".
excelente!!! nunca había tenido la oportnidad de ver y escuchar a Osho, solo leeí algunos de sus libros. Fue muy emocionante y didáctico. Entiendo su interés por mostrarnos la forma de meditar, que consta fundamentalmente en dejar descanzar la mente. Buenísimo!!!
What Osho is saying is nothing special because it is the same thing mystics throughout the ages and ancient shamanic societies have said. There's virtually no difference between what he says and, for example, what a typical Tibetan Buddhist would tell you.
@joseg1787 It occurred to me that you must be listening to Osho to become special. Truth can not be something special, it must be available anytime, anywhere, everywhere. Specialness is something our egos/separate sense of selves might seek. This is one of many forms of seeking. All seeking is towards the same experience of knowing ourselves which is Osho is also saying.
Listen to OSHO without any prejudices or faith in mind. Just be attentive, close your eyes, listen to his words and the silence in between. Have a taste of the reality or truth. No thought of philosophy or of god can open the door of reality of life unless we live this life with our own body, feelings and senses. I bow to this gifted teacher who showered his compassion for no reason throught his various books/ discourses paving us the way towards the blissful and meaningful life.
If you search, you will only find (recognize) what you are able to understand at that time. "Thinking" will condense an infinite experience into a finite, cause/effect reality...transforming the unknowable into the mundane. The intrinsic is lost when we think about it. Thus, "thinking" limits us and keeps us in a box. So don't think and don't worry...just Experience and Feel. And don't think about what I just said either..lol (: /)
At a point it just becomes semantics. by "seeing, I think he is implying that you are just silent, without words or chaos in your mind and you are allowing the consciousness to directly touch reality existentially without the screen of thoughts that are constantly in the way
He has lots of charisma, controls his words, there is no derivation from the matter. Simply beautiful. Those speeches are pure art. We can usually contemplate the deepness of his thoughts. This one was different. I think there some inconsistence when he decides to differentiate the act of seeing and the act of thinking. Both are in fact quite the same. There is no perception without cognition.
Lovely comments... Seeing and thinking are not the same my friend." The mind imposes on reaity is cognative" No mind thinking is seeing deep subconscious awareness - its empty no analysis , i guess we trancend the cognative ? Its like the spaces between the sound that makes music.
I found out that the mentioned argument is in western philosophy called the "paradox of inquiery": "inquiry into the nature of x only makes sense if we don't know the nature of x, and we have a way to determine if a candidate account of x's nature is correct. But if we don't know the nature of x, how are we supposed to determine whether a solution is correct?"
first of all why is he so dragging the whole thing?
isnt he philosophizing it all? i think he refers to philosophy as the tendency to think what the western philosophers have come up with.i study philosophy not precisely to grab what philosophers have said but to how they have thought over things!
@xjavediqbalx "These beautiful metaphors have to be understood with great sympathy, with great intuitiveness, with love, poetry. Not with logic; otherwise you will destroy them." -Osho But because to speak to someone you need to speak their language, maybe that is what he does sometimes. The videos are titled "silence in words" ... it's an absurd notion, even trying to teach, the same with all Buddhas. But it's worth all the effort in bliss anyway, if one can be aided in understanding.
@Cacowninja: Philosophy is a product of the mind. Meditation is no-mind. It is "out side the box." (Ninjas also use "no mind.") Osho is a great spiritual teacher, even years after his death.
If you see sunrise without thinking, than you will think that the sun is in movement and that the earth is not in movement. This is not the reality... If you think , if you search you will realize the truth, the sun is not in movement(relate with the other planets) and the Earth and the other planets are in movement...
The eyes can only see objekts, the mind can see the truth with thinking....
@megasayajinsongoku99 I did this once. I related my size to the earth. The earth to the sun. The sun to space and all that could be out there.The distance and mass of it all. What I am actually looking at. It scared me a little because I have never seen it like that before. I felt so small. And everything else in chaos that nobody can control. But somehow it is perfectly controlled in harmony. It was one of many awakenings for me. I do not consider myself smart. But I think like others don't.
@megasayajinsongoku99 Yes if you search you will find truth but never 100% truth. No one knows or will ever know how the world began so the point is to just live and experience it instead of trying to figure out something that is impossible to find out. Even if we ever do find out how the began...then what? Your still gonna be here on earth living just like you were before, it makes no difference. The point is to just experience things and see them as they are like Osho says.
I wish i could have talked to this man.. But he is making a mind approach.. And he is thinking about things.. He is thinking about the fact, that you/every individual/him self should NOT think.. Therefor he is thinking? Am i right?
@Workhard1994 well first of all i do not thin k he was enlightened therefore he thought....but he was definately able to enter meditative states....second i think enlighted people think...just in a different way....i think they think when they need to explain but they can control it like a body function while we think all the time and pretty much have no control over our thoughts
Oxford University Has Published A Book "THE MAKERS OF THE UNIVERSE", In Which They Have Enlisted 100 People Who Gave Remarkable Contribution To The World Over The Period Of 10,000 Years, Which Is Admired By The Entire UNIVERSE. In this List 1st Name Is "LORD GAUTAM BUDDHA" & 4th Is "Dr. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR" For Their Principle Of EQUANIMITY Which Is The Universal Solution For todays Burning World....
The truth is not always what can be seen with your eyes. I am not so deep thought but he reminds me the St. Thomas story from the Holly Bible.
You see, for example, in the air there are particles which cannot be seen, you can never experience it. So how can you see the truth about this part of the world if you cannot think of ways to see the truth? This leads to thinking. Only junkees are not thinking. Thinking is what we are, this is what makes us a bit different from the other living organism
@711LAB I agree that thinking is important in one sense. I have nothing against people who, like OSHO, abandons the mind to grasp the truth in it's fullness. But I think that the majority of people should be thinking, BUT they should return to and leave from the truth - the silence, the objectless understanding.
The thing is, being in the buddha-mind, you are aware of the particles you can't see. You know them because you know close to everything at once in a deep sense. Get what I'm saying?
@711LAB I once read that the buddha was able to "see" what he assumed was billions of particles that made up his being. This he saw by acheiving such pure sight that the extreme magnify of exterior reality (atoms) became visible instead through extreme magnifying of his interior reality (being).
To think we exist because we think, would mean that if you stopped thinking you would cease to exist.
"Look" in the silence of his words when he speaks.
Indeed! Sometimes we think about some fact using what we heard, seen, or were told before. We should judje thinks from what we see on our own eyes. Though sometimes this is not good. You should not overdo whith these words and use your previous knovlegde, as you can be easily tricked by somebody etc. He said very wise thing, but there are many exeptions on this topic in our modern life that should be studied.
Wonderful way to put it.. 'If you know the Truth, where is the need to think about it? If you don't know the Truth, how can you think about something you don't know? LOL.. Yes.. thinking steals the opportunity to experience.. meditation paves the way as it puts mind aside'
Anyone telling you what other people (especially philosophers) have been thinking should be ignored. He does not and cannot know what others are thinking, he only takes his own imaginings and labels them truth.
He's asserting that ALL philosophers have never looked at reality and do nothing but think about it. Exaggeration is the enemy of truth.
Philosophy is to think about something you dont have an answer for , Something you cant see.. i dont get it ,how can he say that you must see not think
@randoxxxxx I think what he is getting at is that he is looking at life from a right-brained perspective though he calls it "putting his mind aside". He is actually still using his mind but he is using the intuitive, peaceful and feeling hemisphere of his brain to arive at his conclusions instead of using primarily the logical, linearly thinking, left-brain. All philosophies are really a combination of the two. He is just thinking about it in a different way and calls it "seeing" imo.
You must to findout by yourself. The meditation is just the way that can really help you how to do that. As he told, if you think about something, you miss it. You must to be there into that conscience. It not means think about, it means just to be inside. But try the meditation and step by step you'll discovery that by your own. Namaste!
He's got something there! I think for the same reasons, we humans seek religious guidence or even math and science to fill the viod of understanding that we all feel. There has got to be a purpose for all of this, right? So let the man have his view to see the world and perhaps teach us somehting as well!
Not thing is he's problem he's got to be the first bimbo philosifer ever............fucking idiots nowadays think of somthing and instantly think its worth spreading around but its not khandi's teachiung was worth somthing top the human race this is just dribble that should be wiped from history like the creator mind obviously has.
Though I must respect what he means about silence. Renunciation is an endless cycle dependent on its instigator. Awareness which is what he speaks about when he is discussing "seeing" is the actual being. What the mistake here is, is to define philosophy by the history of philosophy. Philosophy in its etymology speaks nothing about "thinking", it speaks about Love (Philos) and Wisdom (Sophia). It does not speak about knowledge but after philosophy has become a reality.
Hmmm, I like this guy. I understand what he is saying, but... philosophy and scientific thinking have many positive aspects. Why should they be mutually exclusive with his method of experiencing the world?
Besides you can 'see' a thought just as well as you can see reality with your own eyes. What's wrong with that?
Our world is hostage to the insatiable rampaging of the ruling class private gain and greed, dominating,dehumanising,devaluing everyone and everything in the midst. We can and must change the wage slavery of immense humanity in a market system of artificial scarcity . We can share the world for our common needs and well being in harmony within and without.
Enlightenment is the state of being with no mind. It is the disappearance of the ego. It is the loss of all identification with the body and the mind. It is freedom from beliefs, opinions, ideals and concepts. It is always sudden, because it is not an achievement; it is already the case. It is a remembering. it is called the pathless path, that is, it is not something to be achieved, but it is to be Realized and lived. There have been thousands of people who have been considered "Enlightened."
Philosophizing is what gives clarity to a day of experiencing. With out thinking you would be confused and not recognize the world and become like a zombie.
Philosophy simply means love of wisdom, if he believes himself to gain wisdom through experience or meditation and actively seeks it then he is participating in philosophy.
On his final point however there was a fallacy for wisdom and knowledge do not mean the same thing. They are not interchangeable.
New born babies just see the world without thinking. They need to think about their world eventualy so they don't keep hurting them selves. Maybe OSHO is claiming to be like a new born and just forget about his past. Kind of unwise.
filo + sofia. = love of knowledge . since ancients days. human heritage. that is the goal that God posed for us. the rest is devious talk for mind storming rubbish. reality is accepting reality. and that means values as respect, love, kindness. get a grip old man - you are outdated by your own friend.
Knowledge has brought the greatest peace and harmony to the world, not thinking has brought the opposite. The problems of the world do not exist because people think too much, nor did the atrocities of history occur because of an excess of intelligence.
Pure being is where we start from as babies- on the immediate perceptual level.
We learn to identify reality by integrating instances into concepts in order to deal with the world correctly.
@MIndMattersMost Intelligence is not the same as thinking. Intelligence is gained by inspiring the mind to be creative and by feeding the mind sensible information - to continue to think over something is what gave us disease research, but it also gave us millions of torture animals. The idea here is that we may think we are thinking the right thing, but we don't and never have. Look at the human life, objectively as what should be a balanced species on this planet. Is it still balanced?
@MIndMattersMost , well I don't think OSHO is totally against thinking when thinking is necessary like in science etc. Generally he was pro science as I understood. In my opinion, what he is talking about here is thinking when it is unnecessary. Like when playing with your child and thinking about work or politics at the same time. You miss the precious moments of life when you do such things and the thoughts are in vain because they don't produce any results.
After you spend some time studying it for some time, get to read about Hermeticism if you are able to understand such teachings then come back to see Osho's videos and you'll see that he is spot on.
Osho is very talented at getting across the 'no mind' approach, which can be hard to put into words because it is beyond words. This is my understanding. Very nice.
well now i am thinking about "not thinking about the truths". so my conclusion is, not thinking is an illusion. and people wastes their lifwith this kind of paradoxes. if you want some relief, read the only uncorrupted book which was sent by the mind behind your minds. it's first verse is: Read
OSHO is on the right track I THINK. haha Bad joke. But it really does ring truth within me, without me having to think about it. So therefore I accept it as my truth.
Seeing is not believing. Believing is seeing. (@ enfomy)
The mind sees what it wants... what it already believes to be real.
Osho here provides full of contradicting ideas, how one can know without thinking? Even he provides the philosophical insight and judgment of the subject matter of truth concept, hence implying the very method he so vigorously opposes. Nearly all newly revived eastern ideologies refute thinking and promote the passive-emotional approach to the reality instead, which by its true essence is nothing but partial nature of human psychological condition.
Well, it's your way to defer from that, somehow i use other method which i get make unnecessary definitely the philosophy and not only that but also the understanding, believing, knowledge and know/wisdom and of course less the vision. In fact and like contribuition to affirmation from nature of the things, the man had never philosophed, it was the worst mistake that had done in his life!
Seeing to be observing from being objective. Being in the place of thought in the mind process is observing and in taking information to draw a subjective bias. Interesting stuff.
What he meant by "thinking" was, when we think, we debate. When you debate, we have multiple choices and when you opt for one over the other, you become biased.
I disagree. How can one know anything without thinking about it? If you see something but don't think about what it is then how can you know it at all? For all you know it could be a hallucination and it wouldn't be real at all, but you wouldn't know because you didn't think if it was real or not because to you seeing is believing right? I'm not trying to be an ass or anything but don't take philosophy so lightly, if you have a brain use it.
@enfomy if you think you dont see, because you are thinking, you are discussing inside yourself, this proces distracts you from the real life.
you need to be sensitive to see, you need intuition, you need to feel. ofcourse thoughts will cross your mind, but the thoughts are a bi-product, they are words that come to you after you have SEEN, so you can translate the experience into words.
The better you can see, the more sensitve you are, the stronger your thoughts will be!
Too much thinking can make you sad... and it will give negative consequences. You should remain on the bell curve somewhere stable but your WORK should be driven far, not only your thinking.
You are quite right. Thinking can have very negative consequences. People have been burnt for their thoughts in history, and there are still some institutions nowadays which wouldn't agree more with you.
Too much thinking can make you sad... and it will give negative consequences. You should remain on the bell curve somewhere stable but your WORK should be driven far, not only your thinking.
This sounds all true. But would you not see only what is there? You would not change anything with this kind of attitude. No development would grow out of this. Ergo philosia is as is and philosophy is resulting in development, which is needed for a new awareness. The own motivation decides between philosia and philosophy but in the end zeitgeist is with philosophy. - THINK!
You aren't understanding what he is saying, obviously you can continue "thinking" as in knowing what you want to do/ say etc but it's actually spontaneous and sane without the doubt which you call thought. The fact is everything should make absolute sense, it's all a recurring pattern. Your thoughts aren't you, watch how they always match what you are feeling. To be real we have to become one with the breathe in the one moment.
Truth is beyond words, you can't reduce it to a concept. The law of gravity was found by a creative man, who had to be in a state of no-mind- al least for w while and then of course he described his own discovery though words.
But mind in only computer, it has a dead knowledge. Really creative ideas comes from no mind- pure awareness- the man has to be still .
like if the truth could come to your mind without thinking, this is absolutely ridiculous, the law of gravity has not been found by a sleeping man. Plus, to explain how and why not to seek knowledge, he is sharing a knowledge with us ! The knowledge that we should not seek knowledge ! Everything lacks of logic in his speech, but I still appreciate a little message : Dont forget to enjoy things in life. cause thinking too much can drag you away from it, but the words "too much" are very important
Being and thinking are two very different concepts of living. He is talking about Being. We still have the state of consciousness we all reside with mindfully, but we utilize it in a different way. Without thinking we bring the mind into neutral focus into the absolute present and we see the true beauty of earth. If we think we prone ourselves to biases and stop ourselves of seeing true beauty that simply Is.
Chemical table has been discovered in the sleep by Dmitrij Mendelejev. Modern world won't have been possible without it. There're different ways of thinking.
if you have to do any thinking to notice gravity something is seriously wrong with you. if you come to a cliff you aren't gonna stand there trying to make a decision about whether or not to keep walking in the same direction. and although he's sharing knowledge with us he's also sharing the silences between the words. you are just not listening to those silences cause you're too busy listening to your mind!
osho says a man's ego created god. i think there is some truth in it. Ego doen't hesitate to creat unrealistic thoughts and beliefs to protect itself from injury, harm or for that matter the worst, death. Ego created god/hope to seek ethernal life because of fear of complete destruction.
Phenomenology a rather radical and new form of philosophy, which may have never reached OSHO, is based on an emipical aproach to analysing phenomenons, such as a sunset. It requires that we drop our preconceptions of thought that illude us from true experience, and simply observe,
I totally disagree with you that Phenomenology was unknown to Osho..This philosophy has its origins in zen buddhism and Taoism..and on both these topics Osho has spoken extensively...Please find atleast 30 hours of discourse on this topic in a cd called 'Es Dhammo Sanantano' from any Osho shop.
I like this, especially i like this when it is applied to a deterministic environment. He states seeing is not thinking and to me its beautiful! You see "seeing" in the context he uses is essentially "feeling" in a deterministic environment.
Who cares how big his watch, If your eyes were blessed enough to witness that original principle of you, that shines so bright it doesn't disappear with the sunset, there is a space that is unalterable and unchanging; immaculate being. it will be laughter, at how you saw yourself living on a timeline, and then you see into the mirror of existence and no longer see yourself as an ever-changing self portait.
Can you describe the unknown pulse of the universe?
One can either perceive something or one can think about something but not both at the same time. We think in language, which is an abstraction. Words are not the thing they represent. We cannot eat the word "food". So as Bagwan says, thinking carries us away from experience. into a mental structure.. Try to perceive, but don't talk to yourself about what it is you are perceiving. Don't describe it or comment to yourself. You will find that life is rich beyond anything imaginable.
Osho makes me happy
101triquetra101 2 weeks ago
he is the master of masters. he is ahead of our times. only intellectuals can understand him, but his way will definitely change the world.
vijayashashidhar 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrRestiu 1 month ago
master, please u try again
vg19811 1 month ago
sup
imapisces23 1 month ago
Comment removed
noshimaq 1 month ago
@noshimaq the basic logic of life is that out of nothing, nothing comes. he is saying, you can only know what you see. instead of thinking about life, let life impose itself onto you. experience life consciously or you will not know what you see and continue on thinking. guessing.
VaderNocturnas 1 month ago
@VaderNocturnas
afzalarl 2 weeks ago
The Great master..
TheTvstar12 2 months ago
I love you
FFreeLevant 2 months ago
osho
nileshbarshepatil 2 months ago
56 people clicked the wrong thumb by mistake.
rrabit44 2 months ago
Listening to the rhythmic tone of this man's voice, coupled with his insight, are undeserved pleasures.
waringpriestfilms 2 months ago
master..
alexandrebocage 2 months ago
lets say i wanted to solve a math problem. by looking at it without solving it before i will simply not be able to solve it. i will need to think. eyes to not discover the truth about life in all its aspects, but lets us notice things and analyze it on our own way to get a meaning out of it. i love Philosophy because i like wisdom. i created my personal Philosophy and understand life in my own way. if people follow him we all will have the same way of life which is imposible.
bahrain1988 3 months ago
@bahrain1988
if you replace "same way" with "similar way", your impossible go away.
There is much behind this few min. speech he gave. There is one of the most profound wisdom behind what he said... read "no water, no moon" to understand it.
BestestMoron 3 months ago
@bahrain1988 he never said we have to follow him, he says everyone should find theire own way in life.
TheHoffmanHouse 2 months ago
Please subtitles for this viideo i understand, but not all (spanish)i need the final part.
g4loh 4 months ago
wow Bruce lee said the same thing from 2:30 to 4:20. this is the link i know bruce lee says it in a movie but he said it no one told him to say it. (Finger Pointing to the Moon - Bruce Lee) from 1:16 to the end. i am trying to find other videos where bruse lee is going in to more detail about it.
emanuelpro07 5 months ago
As a Ph. D. in Philosphy let be say that your option is backed by nothing.
You cannot know truth, you can experience it, you can seek it, but it is outside of the human experience to know truth. And if you "know" truth and yet deny the existence of God then your denying truth, that which you claim to "know"
A man that knows, and knows that he knows, knows nothing
truthseeker010101 5 months ago
@truthseeker010101 speaking in terms of knowledge, yoBut this man doens't claim to know anything. His point of view comes out of accepting relativity of knowledge and "truth" and seeing the only absolute truth in raw experience.
luisini 5 months ago
@truthseeker010101 whit all due respect,you are trying too hard,this man doesn't try to prove or state nothing,he only says what he sees and understands.you ph. d. doesn't help you here.
crashoveride121 4 months ago
Really Osho was not a philosopher he is living in our heart .
domestichelpinindia 5 months ago
Excuse me, what means linked comment? Linked to what?
Sadawala65 5 months ago
The bible is poorly written - it that the best your god can do ? ? ?
GuyLamunyon 5 months ago
you have to think to know
jackscrack99 6 months ago
@jackscrack99 What nonsense! As soon as you think, you miss it. Knowledge only comes through intuition.
11Larisha 5 months ago
@jackscrack99 yes for most things in life but not if you want to be in this state Osho is talking about..which is the opposite of thinking. Just a knowing.
ncripzx 5 months ago
Osho is a fucking Genius and Living legend
shadowvowed187 6 months ago
If he was a follower of the Zen Buddhism, why people keep saying he had created a religion himself? I read one of his books this week and basically, all he says it's Buddhism of Mahayanna school...and If he was a so modest second what I read about his speeches, why using such flashy clothes and a collection of Rolls Royce? I mean, it's contraditory...his vision of life is extremely respectful indeed but some things do not fit, it's just like "Do what I say but don't do what I do".
IndyCarDriver 6 months ago
Think he is asking people not to think about it but to experience it....
melodicdeathFAN 6 months ago
excelente!!! nunca había tenido la oportnidad de ver y escuchar a Osho, solo leeí algunos de sus libros. Fue muy emocionante y didáctico. Entiendo su interés por mostrarnos la forma de meditar, que consta fundamentalmente en dejar descanzar la mente. Buenísimo!!!
nelidali 6 months ago
What Osho is saying is nothing special because it is the same thing mystics throughout the ages and ancient shamanic societies have said. There's virtually no difference between what he says and, for example, what a typical Tibetan Buddhist would tell you.
joseg1787 8 months ago
@joseg1787 It occurred to me that you must be listening to Osho to become special. Truth can not be something special, it must be available anytime, anywhere, everywhere. Specialness is something our egos/separate sense of selves might seek. This is one of many forms of seeking. All seeking is towards the same experience of knowing ourselves which is Osho is also saying.
Slimarus 7 months ago
Listen to OSHO without any prejudices or faith in mind. Just be attentive, close your eyes, listen to his words and the silence in between. Have a taste of the reality or truth. No thought of philosophy or of god can open the door of reality of life unless we live this life with our own body, feelings and senses. I bow to this gifted teacher who showered his compassion for no reason throught his various books/ discourses paving us the way towards the blissful and meaningful life.
mukerjeec 8 months ago
If you search, you will only find (recognize) what you are able to understand at that time. "Thinking" will condense an infinite experience into a finite, cause/effect reality...transforming the unknowable into the mundane. The intrinsic is lost when we think about it. Thus, "thinking" limits us and keeps us in a box. So don't think and don't worry...just Experience and Feel. And don't think about what I just said either..lol (: /)
No1warp9 9 months ago
At a point it just becomes semantics. by "seeing, I think he is implying that you are just silent, without words or chaos in your mind and you are allowing the consciousness to directly touch reality existentially without the screen of thoughts that are constantly in the way
AnnastezhaaMC 9 months ago
He has lots of charisma, controls his words, there is no derivation from the matter. Simply beautiful. Those speeches are pure art. We can usually contemplate the deepness of his thoughts. This one was different. I think there some inconsistence when he decides to differentiate the act of seeing and the act of thinking. Both are in fact quite the same. There is no perception without cognition.
isatis55 10 months ago
@isatis55
Lovely comments... Seeing and thinking are not the same my friend." The mind imposes on reaity is cognative" No mind thinking is seeing deep subconscious awareness - its empty no analysis , i guess we trancend the cognative ? Its like the spaces between the sound that makes music.
osteoiian 8 months ago
I found out that the mentioned argument is in western philosophy called the "paradox of inquiery": "inquiry into the nature of x only makes sense if we don't know the nature of x, and we have a way to determine if a candidate account of x's nature is correct. But if we don't know the nature of x, how are we supposed to determine whether a solution is correct?"
FunkYouMan 10 months ago
Being used to western philosophy, i find this really hard to take seriously...
merzer131 10 months ago
Osho is one in a million, his words are bound to sound strange very few people have gone beyond the noise of the mind.
BurntCatMedia 10 months ago
first of all why is he so dragging the whole thing?
isnt he philosophizing it all? i think he refers to philosophy as the tendency to think what the western philosophers have come up with.i study philosophy not precisely to grab what philosophers have said but to how they have thought over things!
xjavediqbalx 10 months ago
@xjavediqbalx "These beautiful metaphors have to be understood with great sympathy, with great intuitiveness, with love, poetry. Not with logic; otherwise you will destroy them." -Osho But because to speak to someone you need to speak their language, maybe that is what he does sometimes. The videos are titled "silence in words" ... it's an absurd notion, even trying to teach, the same with all Buddhas. But it's worth all the effort in bliss anyway, if one can be aided in understanding.
danijmay 6 months ago
Osho is NOT a philosopher say WHAT??? Then what is he then?
Cacowninja 11 months ago
@Cacowninja: Philosophy is a product of the mind. Meditation is no-mind. It is "out side the box." (Ninjas also use "no mind.") Osho is a great spiritual teacher, even years after his death.
willlowey 11 months ago
@Cacowninja
He is a great mystic.
schlumbucket 10 months ago
Tinks about Tings LMAO hahahaha
Die4Money 11 months ago
why he is philosophize?
MasekiKurde 11 months ago
He's thought this through lol :)
futuredeath 1 year ago
@futuredeath Good one, I thought the same thing.
PorroFirst 10 months ago
Comment removed
BurntCatMedia 10 months ago
If you see sunrise without thinking, than you will think that the sun is in movement and that the earth is not in movement. This is not the reality... If you think , if you search you will realize the truth, the sun is not in movement(relate with the other planets) and the Earth and the other planets are in movement...
The eyes can only see objekts, the mind can see the truth with thinking....
megasayajinsongoku99 1 year ago
@megasayajinsongoku99 Actually it's all moving. The sun is rotating around the center of the galaxy and that's moving too.
1ivingHe11 1 year ago
@megasayajinsongoku99 I did this once. I related my size to the earth. The earth to the sun. The sun to space and all that could be out there.The distance and mass of it all. What I am actually looking at. It scared me a little because I have never seen it like that before. I felt so small. And everything else in chaos that nobody can control. But somehow it is perfectly controlled in harmony. It was one of many awakenings for me. I do not consider myself smart. But I think like others don't.
MrMetalinyourhead 10 months ago
@megasayajinsongoku99 Yes if you search you will find truth but never 100% truth. No one knows or will ever know how the world began so the point is to just live and experience it instead of trying to figure out something that is impossible to find out. Even if we ever do find out how the began...then what? Your still gonna be here on earth living just like you were before, it makes no difference. The point is to just experience things and see them as they are like Osho says.
TheHoffmanHouse 9 months ago
he's just saying that his way is seeing the world objectively, and a philosopher see's the world subjectively.
SwampMonsta420 1 year ago
is it only me or his hands glowing? :o
Adeemzz 1 year ago
Instead of arguing or even disagreeing with what he is saying..The least you can do is take it or leave it..
TheBuddha2be 1 year ago
I wish i could have talked to this man.. But he is making a mind approach.. And he is thinking about things.. He is thinking about the fact, that you/every individual/him self should NOT think.. Therefor he is thinking? Am i right?
Workhard1994 1 year ago
@Workhard1994 well first of all i do not thin k he was enlightened therefore he thought....but he was definately able to enter meditative states....second i think enlighted people think...just in a different way....i think they think when they need to explain but they can control it like a body function while we think all the time and pretty much have no control over our thoughts
sergsfault 1 year ago
i need the traduction in all the videos
please
kiko26188 1 year ago
i need the traduction in all the videos
kiko26188 1 year ago
he had smoked good stuff
CenrionPrime 1 year ago
Oxford University Has Published A Book "THE MAKERS OF THE UNIVERSE", In Which They Have Enlisted 100 People Who Gave Remarkable Contribution To The World Over The Period Of 10,000 Years, Which Is Admired By The Entire UNIVERSE. In this List 1st Name Is "LORD GAUTAM BUDDHA" & 4th Is "Dr. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR" For Their Principle Of EQUANIMITY Which Is The Universal Solution For todays Burning World....
Namo Buddha! Jai Bhim!!
bipinnagarale 1 year ago
I am so parodying this.
Nagneto 1 year ago
GOD ... I needed a good laugh!
Oh crap.. I thought about the laugh, so now I guess I really didn't enjoy it.
whooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeee
liberty1911 1 year ago
The truth is not always what can be seen with your eyes. I am not so deep thought but he reminds me the St. Thomas story from the Holly Bible.
You see, for example, in the air there are particles which cannot be seen, you can never experience it. So how can you see the truth about this part of the world if you cannot think of ways to see the truth? This leads to thinking. Only junkees are not thinking. Thinking is what we are, this is what makes us a bit different from the other living organism
711LAB 1 year ago
@711LAB I agree that thinking is important in one sense. I have nothing against people who, like OSHO, abandons the mind to grasp the truth in it's fullness. But I think that the majority of people should be thinking, BUT they should return to and leave from the truth - the silence, the objectless understanding.
The thing is, being in the buddha-mind, you are aware of the particles you can't see. You know them because you know close to everything at once in a deep sense. Get what I'm saying?
holm81 1 year ago
@711LAB I once read that the buddha was able to "see" what he assumed was billions of particles that made up his being. This he saw by acheiving such pure sight that the extreme magnify of exterior reality (atoms) became visible instead through extreme magnifying of his interior reality (being).
To think we exist because we think, would mean that if you stopped thinking you would cease to exist.
"Look" in the silence of his words when he speaks.
akomapochuff 1 year ago
@711LAB i do not know how much you read or know about osho but one thing is certain you know very much about holly bible....am i right?
ankit12feb89 1 year ago
I wonder how much thinking was required to make this.
MattSquach 1 year ago
Indeed! Sometimes we think about some fact using what we heard, seen, or were told before. We should judje thinks from what we see on our own eyes. Though sometimes this is not good. You should not overdo whith these words and use your previous knovlegde, as you can be easily tricked by somebody etc. He said very wise thing, but there are many exeptions on this topic in our modern life that should be studied.
NeNipponjin 1 year ago
Wonderful way to put it.. 'If you know the Truth, where is the need to think about it? If you don't know the Truth, how can you think about something you don't know? LOL.. Yes.. thinking steals the opportunity to experience.. meditation paves the way as it puts mind aside'
divinita1000 1 year ago
this is my teacher, worship this man!
GeorgeGogle 1 year ago
HIPNOTIC SLOW MAN !!!
MaarTs8 1 year ago
de philosopher tinks about tings. Oh yeah, this guy's a yuckin' yenious!
gdt928 1 year ago
@ all OSHO IS The greatest
232323theone 1 year ago
the convincing stare of those eyes during the long long breaks. he just must be seeing beyond!
Kahvelisika 1 year ago
I can not see what you speak about Osho.
ohnoemynameistaken 1 year ago
Comment removed
Kahvelisika 1 year ago
I FEEL LIKE I KNOW THE TRUTH...BUT NOBODY LIKES TO HEAR IT..
solun82 1 year ago
@solun82 i think i feel i dont know...lol
shakeexon 1 year ago
Anyone telling you what other people (especially philosophers) have been thinking should be ignored. He does not and cannot know what others are thinking, he only takes his own imaginings and labels them truth.
He's asserting that ALL philosophers have never looked at reality and do nothing but think about it. Exaggeration is the enemy of truth.
...also.. is that watch studded in diamonds?
Philosification 1 year ago
the way he talks reminds me of the south park episode with all the physics, nan nana nanana nana,
icezzgold 1 year ago
This guy has a very nice watch. Capitalism FTW!
Lol.
kazearaki 1 year ago
@kazearaki bling bling well spotted
wunnybabbit 1 year ago
I think that is the reason his mousetache took over to his lips because he do not
thinking...........hahahhahaah otherwise it grow more.....idiot........hahahah
strangerlover11 1 year ago
@strangerlover11
you grammar good :P
GrimJackalGrin 1 year ago
Philosophy is to think about something you dont have an answer for , Something you cant see.. i dont get it ,how can he say that you must see not think
randoxxxxx 1 year ago
@randoxxxxx I think what he is getting at is that he is looking at life from a right-brained perspective though he calls it "putting his mind aside". He is actually still using his mind but he is using the intuitive, peaceful and feeling hemisphere of his brain to arive at his conclusions instead of using primarily the logical, linearly thinking, left-brain. All philosophies are really a combination of the two. He is just thinking about it in a different way and calls it "seeing" imo.
Damienf77 1 year ago
@Damienf77 It is not just a matter of left/right brain. There is also the matter of higher/lower consciousness... the process unattached to "i"
TheOriginalEntz 1 year ago
@randoxxxxx
You must to findout by yourself. The meditation is just the way that can really help you how to do that. As he told, if you think about something, you miss it. You must to be there into that conscience. It not means think about, it means just to be inside. But try the meditation and step by step you'll discovery that by your own. Namaste!
mmunis 1 year ago
He's got something there! I think for the same reasons, we humans seek religious guidence or even math and science to fill the viod of understanding that we all feel. There has got to be a purpose for all of this, right? So let the man have his view to see the world and perhaps teach us somehting as well!
lisa7quantum 1 year ago
Not thing is he's problem he's got to be the first bimbo philosifer ever............fucking idiots nowadays think of somthing and instantly think its worth spreading around but its not khandi's teachiung was worth somthing top the human race this is just dribble that should be wiped from history like the creator mind obviously has.
manic42018 1 year ago
Though I must respect what he means about silence. Renunciation is an endless cycle dependent on its instigator. Awareness which is what he speaks about when he is discussing "seeing" is the actual being. What the mistake here is, is to define philosophy by the history of philosophy. Philosophy in its etymology speaks nothing about "thinking", it speaks about Love (Philos) and Wisdom (Sophia). It does not speak about knowledge but after philosophy has become a reality.
sleepyhead4 1 year ago
this discussion is like: do you love eating or food?
which is it which is it lol
natmanprime 1 year ago
I listen of he's wisdom for the last 4 hours, He is fantastic
didikh 1 year ago
Hmmm, I like this guy. I understand what he is saying, but... philosophy and scientific thinking have many positive aspects. Why should they be mutually exclusive with his method of experiencing the world?
Besides you can 'see' a thought just as well as you can see reality with your own eyes. What's wrong with that?
AlexanderTheHuge 1 year ago
His mouth is an eye
RaremarshandRuby 1 year ago
The pure and simple truth is never pure and rarely simple.
nydaimyo 1 year ago
mm His view is wronge
Seeing is being stuck in one place / what i mean is that this world is bound by laws
when you think and question you see past them, your brain is what connects you to the infiinite
swepa2 1 year ago
@swepa2 yes! his view is very wronge!
scoutcheie16 1 year ago
Our world is hostage to the insatiable rampaging of the ruling class private gain and greed, dominating,dehumanising,devaluing everyone and everything in the midst. We can and must change the wage slavery of immense humanity in a market system of artificial scarcity . We can share the world for our common needs and well being in harmony within and without.
arzoyan 1 year ago
dont do drugs
rectum1001 1 year ago
Enlightenment is the state of being with no mind. It is the disappearance of the ego. It is the loss of all identification with the body and the mind. It is freedom from beliefs, opinions, ideals and concepts. It is always sudden, because it is not an achievement; it is already the case. It is a remembering. it is called the pathless path, that is, it is not something to be achieved, but it is to be Realized and lived. There have been thousands of people who have been considered "Enlightened."
jarral48 1 year ago
This Guy is the 'Man of Horror and Sympathy -both reviving and destroying the Social Ideas and Norms.He Sharpens the vision and keep you open!
dearrajan 1 year ago
Pure crystalized counciousness. Diamond...and Honey...
Sadawala65 1 year ago
Philosophizing is what gives clarity to a day of experiencing. With out thinking you would be confused and not recognize the world and become like a zombie.
sillymonkey8888 1 year ago
@sillymonkey8888 Mental , in oriental spirituality has a negative connotation to it.
He his not reffering to the same mental as the mental we , westerners conceive.
From his point of view the ''mental'' is an aberration composed of guilt , fears and unfulfilled desires.
Therefore the ''mental'' is what dictates what the ego wants and therefore CREATES the suffering .
What the ''mental'' what is formed through what society wants variating on the time and the space.
Mental=Social construct
MrNovoid 1 year ago
I think he has misunderstood philosophy.
Philosophy simply means love of wisdom, if he believes himself to gain wisdom through experience or meditation and actively seeks it then he is participating in philosophy.
On his final point however there was a fallacy for wisdom and knowledge do not mean the same thing. They are not interchangeable.
AsifVidios 1 year ago
New born babies just see the world without thinking. They need to think about their world eventualy so they don't keep hurting them selves. Maybe OSHO is claiming to be like a new born and just forget about his past. Kind of unwise.
432hrtz 1 year ago
filo + sofia. = love of knowledge . since ancients days. human heritage. that is the goal that God posed for us. the rest is devious talk for mind storming rubbish. reality is accepting reality. and that means values as respect, love, kindness. get a grip old man - you are outdated by your own friend.
sushisazimi68 1 year ago
I hear reloading in the room...
Lol anyway, very interesting but I don´t think I can ever think like him, he has a point but its like I agree with him, for now...
AsashiSakai 1 year ago
Knowledge has brought the greatest peace and harmony to the world, not thinking has brought the opposite. The problems of the world do not exist because people think too much, nor did the atrocities of history occur because of an excess of intelligence.
Pure being is where we start from as babies- on the immediate perceptual level.
We learn to identify reality by integrating instances into concepts in order to deal with the world correctly.
Philosophy means to identify reality.
MIndMattersMost 1 year ago
@MIndMattersMost Intelligence is not the same as thinking. Intelligence is gained by inspiring the mind to be creative and by feeding the mind sensible information - to continue to think over something is what gave us disease research, but it also gave us millions of torture animals. The idea here is that we may think we are thinking the right thing, but we don't and never have. Look at the human life, objectively as what should be a balanced species on this planet. Is it still balanced?
windmoveswater 1 year ago
@MIndMattersMost , well I don't think OSHO is totally against thinking when thinking is necessary like in science etc. Generally he was pro science as I understood. In my opinion, what he is talking about here is thinking when it is unnecessary. Like when playing with your child and thinking about work or politics at the same time. You miss the precious moments of life when you do such things and the thoughts are in vain because they don't produce any results.
Andyba2000 1 year ago
osho the great
mrpersian898989 1 year ago
He is talking about you can’t use mind to figure out the tao (way) of life. You will need to open yourself to it and flow with it.
shifu956 1 year ago
All I need to know in life I already know, I just dont know it
EzeeSKANKIN 1 year ago
intresting
relik69 1 year ago
intresting
relik69 1 year ago
Approach without thinking !!!.. You are in emergency landing man.. I hope you will hold the runway in sight.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
hhahaahaahahaaaaaaaaaaa
pmvbtful 1 year ago
i'm sorry but who is this guy? lol
aj200820082008 1 year ago
@aj200820082008 He is an eastern mystic
vishnu212 1 year ago
@aj200820082008 He is OSHO, a great guru... Just hear him.
mbaquara 1 year ago
great discourse, OSHO has my respects
ken107 1 year ago
he always find the right words to my thinking
solitarywolf61 1 year ago
i like it......
shalini1211320 1 year ago
After you spend some time studying it for some time, get to read about Hermeticism if you are able to understand such teachings then come back to see Osho's videos and you'll see that he is spot on.
jakuna3333 1 year ago
his hat does nicely with the color of his beard ;P
thelifeuwant 1 year ago
Osho is very talented at getting across the 'no mind' approach, which can be hard to put into words because it is beyond words. This is my understanding. Very nice.
Simon0 1 year ago
Então, faz uma coisa: vai tomar no cú
marcoschaer 1 year ago
yes it is
ReelVisible 1 year ago
well now i am thinking about "not thinking about the truths". so my conclusion is, not thinking is an illusion. and people wastes their lifwith this kind of paradoxes. if you want some relief, read the only uncorrupted book which was sent by the mind behind your minds. it's first verse is: Read
opnasd 1 year ago
its throu man he fucked all the pheloshofers around the world by these words heheh great man
lebnen143 1 year ago
OSHO is on the right track I THINK. haha Bad joke. But it really does ring truth within me, without me having to think about it. So therefore I accept it as my truth.
Seeing is not believing. Believing is seeing. (@ enfomy)
The mind sees what it wants... what it already believes to be real.
Drummur 1 year ago
thanks.....................editor
travancoremedia 1 year ago
Osho here provides full of contradicting ideas, how one can know without thinking? Even he provides the philosophical insight and judgment of the subject matter of truth concept, hence implying the very method he so vigorously opposes. Nearly all newly revived eastern ideologies refute thinking and promote the passive-emotional approach to the reality instead, which by its true essence is nothing but partial nature of human psychological condition.
portoxali 1 year ago
yep, minds are limited and sick
If you look up the sky it looks like sun is circulating around the earth
In middle ages if someone said that earth is round was killed. That discover happend when person felt in no mind state.
While at the other side of planet mayans knew everything about astronomy.
Shkarya 1 year ago
Well, it's your way to defer from that, somehow i use other method which i get make unnecessary definitely the philosophy and not only that but also the understanding, believing, knowledge and know/wisdom and of course less the vision. In fact and like contribuition to affirmation from nature of the things, the man had never philosophed, it was the worst mistake that had done in his life!
KentoOtokoiki 1 year ago
Seeing to be observing from being objective. Being in the place of thought in the mind process is observing and in taking information to draw a subjective bias. Interesting stuff.
Gonji 1 year ago
FILOS means friend. FILIA means love.
bouzoukiHOLLAND 1 year ago
What he meant by "thinking" was, when we think, we debate. When you debate, we have multiple choices and when you opt for one over the other, you become biased.
nyartmaker 1 year ago
I disagree. How can one know anything without thinking about it? If you see something but don't think about what it is then how can you know it at all? For all you know it could be a hallucination and it wouldn't be real at all, but you wouldn't know because you didn't think if it was real or not because to you seeing is believing right? I'm not trying to be an ass or anything but don't take philosophy so lightly, if you have a brain use it.
enfomy 1 year ago
@enfomy
Then please prove me that someone is in love? That you are in love with someone.
Prove it to me.
FearDotKill 1 year ago
@enfomy then you are blind
Klahnto 1 year ago
@enfomy if you think you dont see, because you are thinking, you are discussing inside yourself, this proces distracts you from the real life.
you need to be sensitive to see, you need intuition, you need to feel. ofcourse thoughts will cross your mind, but the thoughts are a bi-product, they are words that come to you after you have SEEN, so you can translate the experience into words.
The better you can see, the more sensitve you are, the stronger your thoughts will be!
Kapojos 1 year ago
think and seen.. is became almost the same... bc theses abilities come from the brain. Is like if u are thinking u are looking and living...
lacobra2012 1 year ago
He is so good at expressing things that are beyond language/words.
Simon0 1 year ago
'tinks about tings'
i really hope that when I'm older I'll be as wise as this guy!
Respect, respect.
jaiadoresarah 1 year ago
Too much thinking can make you sad... and it will give negative consequences. You should remain on the bell curve somewhere stable but your WORK should be driven far, not only your thinking.
Seriously.
ashthegreat 1 year ago
@ashthegreat
You are quite right. Thinking can have very negative consequences. People have been burnt for their thoughts in history, and there are still some institutions nowadays which wouldn't agree more with you.
quontimas 1 year ago
Too much thinking can make you sad... and it will give negative consequences. You should remain on the bell curve somewhere stable but your WORK should be driven far, not only your thinking.
Seriously.
ashthegreat 1 year ago
This sounds all true. But would you not see only what is there? You would not change anything with this kind of attitude. No development would grow out of this. Ergo philosia is as is and philosophy is resulting in development, which is needed for a new awareness. The own motivation decides between philosia and philosophy but in the end zeitgeist is with philosophy. - THINK!
quontimas 1 year ago
You aren't understanding what he is saying, obviously you can continue "thinking" as in knowing what you want to do/ say etc but it's actually spontaneous and sane without the doubt which you call thought. The fact is everything should make absolute sense, it's all a recurring pattern. Your thoughts aren't you, watch how they always match what you are feeling. To be real we have to become one with the breathe in the one moment.
BurntCatMedia 1 year ago
nice earth tones
crazyawakecom 2 years ago
philosia is what ive been looking for all my life
quakers101 2 years ago
lolz.
8thArmada 1 year ago
you need eyes to see the truth, not knowledge.
Osho is sharing only a few signpost to help us to break the identification with the mind.
He has to use words, because we don't understand the language of silence
Thorgalik777 2 years ago
you mean body language?
furnis1 2 years ago
wXingVinny
Truth is beyond words, you can't reduce it to a concept. The law of gravity was found by a creative man, who had to be in a state of no-mind- al least for w while and then of course he described his own discovery though words.
But mind in only computer, it has a dead knowledge. Really creative ideas comes from no mind- pure awareness- the man has to be still .
Thorgalik777 2 years ago
like if the truth could come to your mind without thinking, this is absolutely ridiculous, the law of gravity has not been found by a sleeping man. Plus, to explain how and why not to seek knowledge, he is sharing a knowledge with us ! The knowledge that we should not seek knowledge ! Everything lacks of logic in his speech, but I still appreciate a little message : Dont forget to enjoy things in life. cause thinking too much can drag you away from it, but the words "too much" are very important
wXingVinny 2 years ago
Being and thinking are two very different concepts of living. He is talking about Being. We still have the state of consciousness we all reside with mindfully, but we utilize it in a different way. Without thinking we bring the mind into neutral focus into the absolute present and we see the true beauty of earth. If we think we prone ourselves to biases and stop ourselves of seeing true beauty that simply Is.
TheNadakan 2 years ago
Chemical table has been discovered in the sleep by Dmitrij Mendelejev. Modern world won't have been possible without it. There're different ways of thinking.
overthera1nbow 2 years ago
if you have to do any thinking to notice gravity something is seriously wrong with you. if you come to a cliff you aren't gonna stand there trying to make a decision about whether or not to keep walking in the same direction. and although he's sharing knowledge with us he's also sharing the silences between the words. you are just not listening to those silences cause you're too busy listening to your mind!
muphart 1 year ago
osho says a man's ego created god. i think there is some truth in it. Ego doen't hesitate to creat unrealistic thoughts and beliefs to protect itself from injury, harm or for that matter the worst, death. Ego created god/hope to seek ethernal life because of fear of complete destruction.
24erayfikri69 2 years ago
senses need brain to articulate. brain thinks. tell him to talk without thinking. Just he can count his breath than nothing
OneHumanity1 2 years ago
Phenomenology a rather radical and new form of philosophy, which may have never reached OSHO, is based on an emipical aproach to analysing phenomenons, such as a sunset. It requires that we drop our preconceptions of thought that illude us from true experience, and simply observe,
RiverKWhite 2 years ago
I totally disagree with you that Phenomenology was unknown to Osho..This philosophy has its origins in zen buddhism and Taoism..and on both these topics Osho has spoken extensively...Please find atleast 30 hours of discourse on this topic in a cd called 'Es Dhammo Sanantano' from any Osho shop.
Thank you.
neeraj4zef 2 years ago
2.44 proves exactly what everyone on this post is doing. This guy is unbelievable.
WesleyPipes024 2 years ago
I like this, especially i like this when it is applied to a deterministic environment. He states seeing is not thinking and to me its beautiful! You see "seeing" in the context he uses is essentially "feeling" in a deterministic environment.
leathan7 2 years ago
Who cares how big his watch, If your eyes were blessed enough to witness that original principle of you, that shines so bright it doesn't disappear with the sunset, there is a space that is unalterable and unchanging; immaculate being. it will be laughter, at how you saw yourself living on a timeline, and then you see into the mirror of existence and no longer see yourself as an ever-changing self portait.
Can you describe the unknown pulse of the universe?
dirtmcgirt10 2 years ago
One can either perceive something or one can think about something but not both at the same time. We think in language, which is an abstraction. Words are not the thing they represent. We cannot eat the word "food". So as Bagwan says, thinking carries us away from experience. into a mental structure.. Try to perceive, but don't talk to yourself about what it is you are perceiving. Don't describe it or comment to yourself. You will find that life is rich beyond anything imaginable.
s6y9l 2 years ago
Sessions of wisdom such as this clear that boggled mind of mine.
This, and the rare opportunity to ponder in true silence.
XPator 2 years ago
Love and obliss
jaxxosho 2 years ago