MOON landing panoramas ........(apollo 17 NASA) 5

[shermanr6]

Funny how you never see any 360 degree video. Oh wait, thats becuz we didnt go.

[andschannll]

@shermanr6 "/ that's a very good point! But lol we still went. Anywayz thanks for commenting:)

[prosperomage]

@shermanr6 -- If we "didn't go" then why are the ONLY published self-proclaimed "experts" on the so-called "hoax theory" people who have been proven to be frauds?

And why is their evidence so easy to show to be a bunch of lies targeted at people who don't understand physics?

Why is there not a single person showing a single actual credible piece of evidence of a "hoax"?

[shermanr6]

@prosperomage says who you or them? your perception is your reality, not mine.

[prosperomage]

@shermanr6 -- I am not talking about a subjective "perception" of reality. I am talking about positive, objective proof.

For instance, Bill Kaysing, the originator of the "hoax theory" back in 1969 claimed to be an expert in the subject and said that "the dust should have billowed up and landed on the lander's foot pads."

But it is an objective fact that blown dust cannot possibly "billow" in a vacuum like it does in an atmosphere.

So his own statement proves him to be a fraud.

[andschannll]

@prosperomage In my opinion one event in recent years has done more for the moon hoax debate thany anything before it, and that's Myth Busters episode on debunking moon hoax theories! Whether ppl like them or not they visually showed and explained the effect vacuum has on objects. Whether its why the flag kept moving in the vacuum chamber to why the eagle feather and hammer hit the bottom surface at the same time.......btw thanks for commenting!

[shermanr6]

@prosperomage The PROOF of the matter is that there is no positive proof either way as there is plenty of objective evidence and lack thereof to support what u call the "hoax" theory. My position is not based on a hoax theory, just based on anamolies, common sense and other things that is far from conclusive as you suggest. Hence, your objective proof=u just talking out of your ass!

[prosperomage]

@shermanr6 -- In that case, you didn't seem to understand what I said.

It is a historical fact that Bill Kaysing was the first to publish this "hoax" nonsense. And he used words like "common sense."

And it is an objective fact that his so-called "common sense" was just flat out wrong because dust actually cannot "billow" in a vacuum.

If you have other "common sense" evidence that it may have been a hoax, that might be interesting for you, but have you tested it against actual physics?

[shermanr6]

@prosperomage coomon sense tells me humans are too stupid, primitive and brainwashed to go to the moon just like u for believing yet another fairytale dusney classic.

[prosperomage]

@shermanr6 -- You're using the same "common sense" that my grandmother heard some men using when she was a teenager in 1904 and they said "This Wright Brother's flying machine is just a hoax. Men will never build a machine that can fly."

Your style of "common sense" is, sadly, fairly common among people who are mystified by technology.

Did you know that people figured out how to fly faster than sound? Maybe you didn't know that airplanes can carry 500 people at a time up above the clouds.