Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MREURONCAP I dont think so because this is 0kmh Superb versus 90kmh Yeti. The superb is like deformable barrier here or i dont fully understand your approach here. The mass of the car is the same in both. The problem is that if they used 45kmh both cars going to each other it would depend on masses of both cars. It depends on mass of moving parts in this case than only Yeti weight.

  • Why anyone would get a Volkswagen over a comparable Skoda is beyond me .

    Laura/octavia-jetta

    Superb-passat.

    Also consider the fact that skodas are also cheaper than VWs and are generally better looking from the front . Seriously all VWs look like vento from the front. Rear lighting on the other hand is arguably better on VW models but that is definitely not something I would pay an extra 5 Lakh for

  • jesli naprawde ten test byl przy predkosci 90km/h to jestem pod duzym wrazeniem ze oba auta wytrzymaly dobrze zderzenei chce zobaczyc tez jak oba ay\uta jada na siebie z predkoscia 90km na czolowe zderzenie iniech wtedy eksperci powiedza jakie szanse na przezycie maja pasazerowie aut

  • Jeez, would you even need to go to the doctor after that?! That's f***ing safe!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @Narkoteksss Jedná se o situaci, kdy řidič Superba uvidí proti sobě vozidlo v protisměru (nepozornost, telefonování, zapalování cigarety, práce s navigací a pod) a stačí ještě bezpečně zastavit

    (oficiální vyjádření organizátora testu)

  • skoda yeti (tiguan) vs Superb combi (passat combi)

  • Škoda makes safe vehicles.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more