but, she clearly misunderstands what the morning after pill is, which is probably the result of listening almost exclusively to what fellow pro-lifers have to say about the pill, instead of actually doing her research. TMAP is not an abortiion pill, there are abortion pills available for women and this isn't one of them. Conception takes several days after sex. TMA is just another pill that you can use to prevent conception, except this one is more effective a few days after the condom breaks.
While I am pro-choice myself, I did not find her views extreme at all. She is against prosecution, she is for helping to reduce abortions and help women dealing with a traumatic situation. Remember, there are those that are raped that are initially pro-life and have internal conflict over abortion, counciling might not be bad for those individuals. She doesn't seem to prioritize abortion compared to other problems of the state. BUT...
Cases of rape/incest account for less than 1.5 percent of all abortions. (from "Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives" in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health )
I'm not saying that it's not important or that I don't have sympathy for those who have been raped, but the vast majority of abortions are not due to rape.
I wonder if Sarah Palin would be unapologetic about a 16-year special needs child who is vulnerable to rape/incest and gets raped. Seriously, which side would Palin take, the special needs who is mentally incompetent and doesn't realize what is growing inside of her body that does not belong in her, or the life of the unborn child?
What's even more disturbing is that Palin feels that hormonal contraception interferes with "life," hence it causes an abortion which is akin to murder in her book. I am sure that she would not want the government to fund hormonal contraception and other effective methods. If we all followed her morals we would be stuck with condoms and barrier methods that aren't as effective at preventing unwanted pregnancies as the pill. I think she is too extreme - and she shouldn't decide for any doctor.
Palin speaks as if pro-life vs. pro-choice is a personal, moral choice - which it is - but in the end she's implied she's against legal abortions. I don't take issue with her opinions but I DO take issue with her desire to impose those opinions on my body and the bodies of perfect strangers.
And I'm sorry, but she sounded entirely ignorant in regards to the morning-after pill. For someone with such a strong stance on abortion and the right to choose, that ignorance is simply unacceptable.
Since the war in Iraq began we have lost 4,000troops. Compare that with the roughly 1.37 million children aborted in the United States or the 42 million children aborted worldwide EVERY YEAR, and it's clear which choice truly values human life.
How do you view court cases like the Laci Peterson murder, where a man murdered his pregnant wife and was charged with a double homicide? Or cases where a man intentionally kicks a pregnant woman to kill her unborn child? Do you disagree with the courts that this is murder since the unborn child is a "non-person"? Do you think it should be treated solely as an assault on the mother or do you consider it property damage?
abortion is extreme but there is no reason to illegalize it. it is a personal issue and the federal government, or any govt. for that matter, shouldn't have anything to do with this issue. america, a free country-or is it? (in this case)
I also support a woman's right to choose what to do with her own body so long as that right doesn't infringe on the constitutional right to life of her unborn child.
She didn't sound extreme in any sense - she said she understood the feelings of individuals on both sides and while certain practices didn't appeal to her better senses - she would nether condone nor convict such behaviors as abortion. I swear people will make a mountain out of a mole hill - and nomatter what she would've said you idiots would've found fault.
Wow. It's amazing how backwards our thinking is in this country. Palin said she was for a culture of life and supports making adoptions easier and supporting the victims of incenst and rape and all the posts on here are vilifying her for it? Are you all "pro-choice" meaning you respect a woman's right to choose, including the right to choose for life, or are you all pro-fetal murder? Has our culture compltely desensitized your maternal instincts and dehumanized unborn children?
She supports killing poor brown people in other countries who happen to believe in different make-believe skybuddies and wolves from PLANES.... that doesn't resemble any kind of "culture of life".
MrsMiniver, I use the term children because that is what they are. Precious, defenseless, unborn children that society and the media are trying to desensitize to us by calling them fetuses so when someone drowns them in saline, breaks their skull, or otherwise ends their short lives that we don't know why we feel guilty. If anyone has been tricked in this way, please google "silentnomore" for guidance and support. There is forgivness and hope after an abortion.
Marbare, is there a reason you don't use the term "unborn adult?" And do you, or don't you eat unborn chickens? Perhaps scrambled or sunnyside up? The terms fetus and embryo have definitions related to stages of development, as do the terms child and adult. Quit pretending the media is making up their own language with an agenda. You are. You say we're "tricked" into using the correct scientific terms? Oh give me a break.
Each stage of human life has a name and each human life has value. A fertilized embryo (unlike an unfertilized chicken egg), develops into a fetus, which develops into an infant, which develops into a toddler, a child, a teen, an adult. Each stage has value. It is only special interest groups that want to devalue and dehumaize certain stages of human development.
"dehumanize certain stages of developement" that is what you are doing to women. they arnt dependant on someones body for their survival nor are they living an invasive existence. yet you feel they have less rights to their body than a dependant fetus does. outlawing abortion makes women into incubators. there is no right to be inside me against my will EVER. i have bodily sovereignty. if i cant be free in my own skin, i cant be free anywhere.
Um...that will happen even if palin wins...but they will do it themselves and die because of it. and not everyone seeking an abortion was careless.... when you're raped you don't want a reminder of what happened. its sickening.
Thanks . We need someone who is intelligent,creative,flexible and open to new ideas that might compliment or supplant previously held ideas. Palin is brittle , uneducated , inexperienced,and most importantly not intellectualy equipped to be VP .
She is a good looking moron . You know the type . Beauty Queen who trades on her looks . . Being stupid and a liar . Bad combo . We had one of those . Didn't work out
I hate how she couches her stance in euphemisms - "choose life", "create a culture of life". If she was honest she'd acknowledge the hardships (the emotional distress, likely birth defects, medical risks of birth and economic difficulties) but explain why she feels it's the right decision for the hypothetical young woman to carry the pregnancy to term. Instead she gives us some BS tantamount to wishing for "world peace", as if she was a Ms. Universe contestant.
She's simply ignorant. She thinks that by making it illegal, abortions will stop. They will not. Desperate women will once again face back-alley butchers, and the numbers of babies thrown in the trash will multiply horribly.
Make no mistake. Palin is not Pro-LIFE, she is Pro-BIRTH. If she was Pro-Life, she would support the NATIONAL HEALTH CARE Bill to HELP pregnant women & their babies and pass bills to get women to be supported while they stayed home with their newborns for a few months.
but, she clearly misunderstands what the morning after pill is, which is probably the result of listening almost exclusively to what fellow pro-lifers have to say about the pill, instead of actually doing her research. TMAP is not an abortiion pill, there are abortion pills available for women and this isn't one of them. Conception takes several days after sex. TMA is just another pill that you can use to prevent conception, except this one is more effective a few days after the condom breaks.
DarkAngel0125 1 year ago
While I am pro-choice myself, I did not find her views extreme at all. She is against prosecution, she is for helping to reduce abortions and help women dealing with a traumatic situation. Remember, there are those that are raped that are initially pro-life and have internal conflict over abortion, counciling might not be bad for those individuals. She doesn't seem to prioritize abortion compared to other problems of the state. BUT...
DarkAngel0125 1 year ago
The only culture Sarah promotes is a culture of stupidity! Stupid Sarah stay out of my pants!
jaimeanna1412 1 year ago
Cases of rape/incest account for less than 1.5 percent of all abortions. (from "Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives" in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health )
I'm not saying that it's not important or that I don't have sympathy for those who have been raped, but the vast majority of abortions are not due to rape.
rmbnrsng 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sarah Palin's position on Abortion isn't " extreme".
ptp44444 3 years ago
i have a hard time believing if she was pulled into an alley and gang raped that she wouldnt even consider the morning after pill.
leiapeison 3 years ago 3
I wonder if Sarah Palin would be unapologetic about a 16-year special needs child who is vulnerable to rape/incest and gets raped. Seriously, which side would Palin take, the special needs who is mentally incompetent and doesn't realize what is growing inside of her body that does not belong in her, or the life of the unborn child?
heroikrobb 3 years ago 7
What's even more disturbing is that Palin feels that hormonal contraception interferes with "life," hence it causes an abortion which is akin to murder in her book. I am sure that she would not want the government to fund hormonal contraception and other effective methods. If we all followed her morals we would be stuck with condoms and barrier methods that aren't as effective at preventing unwanted pregnancies as the pill. I think she is too extreme - and she shouldn't decide for any doctor.
masterofmetacognitio 3 years ago 4
Palin speaks as if pro-life vs. pro-choice is a personal, moral choice - which it is - but in the end she's implied she's against legal abortions. I don't take issue with her opinions but I DO take issue with her desire to impose those opinions on my body and the bodies of perfect strangers.
And I'm sorry, but she sounded entirely ignorant in regards to the morning-after pill. For someone with such a strong stance on abortion and the right to choose, that ignorance is simply unacceptable.
purplemuskrat 3 years ago 9
Since the war in Iraq began we have lost 4,000troops. Compare that with the roughly 1.37 million children aborted in the United States or the 42 million children aborted worldwide EVERY YEAR, and it's clear which choice truly values human life.
marbare1 3 years ago
she is so pro-life- yet wants to continue the war in Iraq... I don't understand that. Our young American's are dying every day.
dgrrrl 3 years ago
How do you view court cases like the Laci Peterson murder, where a man murdered his pregnant wife and was charged with a double homicide? Or cases where a man intentionally kicks a pregnant woman to kill her unborn child? Do you disagree with the courts that this is murder since the unborn child is a "non-person"? Do you think it should be treated solely as an assault on the mother or do you consider it property damage?
marbare1 3 years ago
abortion is extreme but there is no reason to illegalize it. it is a personal issue and the federal government, or any govt. for that matter, shouldn't have anything to do with this issue. america, a free country-or is it? (in this case)
imbalinga 3 years ago 3
Someone "unborn" has yet to become a person.
So a sentient being, a non-person, is not protected by the Constitution.
strangebee 3 years ago
So you would support killing an unborn child up until it is physically outside of the womb?
marbare1 3 years ago
That would be up to the woman and her physician to make those decisions on a case to case basis.
strangebee 3 years ago 3
I also support a woman's right to choose what to do with her own body so long as that right doesn't infringe on the constitutional right to life of her unborn child.
marbare1 3 years ago
And yet that constitutional "right to life" of her "unborn child" infringes on HER right to her own body, NOT the other way around.
PS the constitution clearly says, "no one BORN in the United States", it says nothing about the unborn, hmm, I wonder why?
Headhunter004 3 years ago
She didn't sound extreme in any sense - she said she understood the feelings of individuals on both sides and while certain practices didn't appeal to her better senses - she would nether condone nor convict such behaviors as abortion. I swear people will make a mountain out of a mole hill - and nomatter what she would've said you idiots would've found fault.
granitepeace 3 years ago
Wow, idiots? huh? That's mighty christian of you.
strangebee 3 years ago
Ahh... was it all the cute little make-believe friend folk who gave me all those negatives? You guys are so adorable.
XD
strangebee 3 years ago
Wow. It's amazing how backwards our thinking is in this country. Palin said she was for a culture of life and supports making adoptions easier and supporting the victims of incenst and rape and all the posts on here are vilifying her for it? Are you all "pro-choice" meaning you respect a woman's right to choose, including the right to choose for life, or are you all pro-fetal murder? Has our culture compltely desensitized your maternal instincts and dehumanized unborn children?
marbare1 3 years ago
Culture of life?
She supports killing poor brown people in other countries who happen to believe in different make-believe skybuddies and wolves from PLANES.... that doesn't resemble any kind of "culture of life".
Definite disconnect.
strangebee 3 years ago
You would rather support killing unborn, innocent children than terrorists? Do you even know how many children of color are aborted every year?
marbare1 3 years ago
I don't "support" killing of non-sentient human beings. I do support full-grown women to make their OWN decisions about their OWN bodies.
It's the American thing to do.
strangebee 3 years ago 5
Marbare, do you eat unborn chickens? Why are you using emotionally laden terms like "children" when you're referring to a fetus?
MrsMiniver 3 years ago
MrsMiniver, I use the term children because that is what they are. Precious, defenseless, unborn children that society and the media are trying to desensitize to us by calling them fetuses so when someone drowns them in saline, breaks their skull, or otherwise ends their short lives that we don't know why we feel guilty. If anyone has been tricked in this way, please google "silentnomore" for guidance and support. There is forgivness and hope after an abortion.
marbare1 3 years ago
Marbare, is there a reason you don't use the term "unborn adult?" And do you, or don't you eat unborn chickens? Perhaps scrambled or sunnyside up? The terms fetus and embryo have definitions related to stages of development, as do the terms child and adult. Quit pretending the media is making up their own language with an agenda. You are. You say we're "tricked" into using the correct scientific terms? Oh give me a break.
MrsMiniver 3 years ago
Each stage of human life has a name and each human life has value. A fertilized embryo (unlike an unfertilized chicken egg), develops into a fetus, which develops into an infant, which develops into a toddler, a child, a teen, an adult. Each stage has value. It is only special interest groups that want to devalue and dehumaize certain stages of human development.
wcrose12 3 years ago
"dehumanize certain stages of developement" that is what you are doing to women. they arnt dependant on someones body for their survival nor are they living an invasive existence. yet you feel they have less rights to their body than a dependant fetus does. outlawing abortion makes women into incubators. there is no right to be inside me against my will EVER. i have bodily sovereignty. if i cant be free in my own skin, i cant be free anywhere.
leiapeison 2 years ago
War kills thousands of our own soldiers as well, do you even bother to try to think this out logically? Evidently not.
Headhunter004 3 years ago 3
Everyone get your metal hangers ready just in case Palin wins.
Which means not only will babies die but so will the mothers.
Pro life huh?
tinkwantspeace 3 years ago 2
can you imagine how many careless people will fill free to get pregnant. If they know the tax payers will carry their bill. No thanks Obama
jmztrans 3 years ago
Um...that will happen even if palin wins...but they will do it themselves and die because of it. and not everyone seeking an abortion was careless.... when you're raped you don't want a reminder of what happened. its sickening.
tinkwantspeace 3 years ago
Just vote Obama..save America..
Mewstor151 3 years ago
this is pro BIRTH not pro LIFE. Most of this anti-abortion nuts couldn't care less what happens to the kid once it's born.
ultimateshowdown2 3 years ago 5
Thanks . We need someone who is intelligent,creative,flexible and open to new ideas that might compliment or supplant previously held ideas. Palin is brittle , uneducated , inexperienced,and most importantly not intellectualy equipped to be VP .
She is a good looking moron . You know the type . Beauty Queen who trades on her looks . . Being stupid and a liar . Bad combo . We had one of those . Didn't work out
braindeadhick 3 years ago
She is scum of the earth.Wait.. that's an insult to scum.
Please, Flying Spaghetti Monster, make her go away.
strangebee 3 years ago
Unbelieveable. Utterly shameful. A disgrace. She (they) must be stopped from entering public office, at the federal level, at all costs.
brad12101975 3 years ago 2
I hate how she couches her stance in euphemisms - "choose life", "create a culture of life". If she was honest she'd acknowledge the hardships (the emotional distress, likely birth defects, medical risks of birth and economic difficulties) but explain why she feels it's the right decision for the hypothetical young woman to carry the pregnancy to term. Instead she gives us some BS tantamount to wishing for "world peace", as if she was a Ms. Universe contestant.
She's allergic to reality.
Lythic 3 years ago 3
Small town mindset on a global stage. Terrifying.
VincentTruman 3 years ago
Everything she says, sickens me. I don't trust her and I think she is a hypocrite. Having her anywhere near the head of our government scares me.
Wymzie 3 years ago
As if this woman didn't scare me enough already...
Thank you, NARAL, for informing me of this new revelation.
veruka247 3 years ago
She's simply ignorant. She thinks that by making it illegal, abortions will stop. They will not. Desperate women will once again face back-alley butchers, and the numbers of babies thrown in the trash will multiply horribly.
Make no mistake. Palin is not Pro-LIFE, she is Pro-BIRTH. If she was Pro-Life, she would support the NATIONAL HEALTH CARE Bill to HELP pregnant women & their babies and pass bills to get women to be supported while they stayed home with their newborns for a few months.
PrincessSilvia 3 years ago 5
OMG this woman gets worse and worse the more I listen to her.
chileanp 3 years ago 3
This woman is frightening. And don't be fooled folks, she is also anti-contraception.
BonzoGal1980 3 years ago