AS Sociology - Feminist view on the Family

[XxmickiemariexX]

Though I dont fully agree with liberal fem, I do agree with the extremist I have been through too much shit caused by men that I think it does need to end, from the domestic to mental abusers as well as men at work, some men dont understand what being a real gentlemen is. I think they tend to forget that some laws are finally changing to where sexual harassment is now taken more seriously than it was back then. I dont believe everything is equal just yet between both sexes.

[fargonbastedge]

@XxmickiemariexX "some men dont understand what being a real gentlemen is."

You can blame that on the feminist movement. Why would men treat women different if there told by feminist that there all equal? You dug your own grave

Maybe men should do what we've been doing from 10,000 BC - 1960 AD. Which is NOT to listen to women because there's no intellectual foundation behind anything that uses there emotions and feelings to make decisions.

[beggo321]

She needs a cock in her box, Period.

[BiGD46]

orite witch

[RayThrushwood]

Why is this cunt not fixing her husband ( master) a sandwich and gobbling on his cock?

[piertangent]

this stoke accent is beautiful. 'CAPEETULLIZUM.'

[derekwise]

Great Video! Okay there are communist states "compost" have your heard of North Korea or China? Seems not. I'd say that Liberal Feminists are really just normal people looking for equality and the rest are war seeking fear mongers. I came her to learn more about the topic for my graduate course and feel that I have learned alot from this vidoe. I hope you will make more in the future.

[compost234]

No such thing as communist state.

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

The high standards of this society is due really to men not women. It's men who still remain the primary (and practically only) inventors/innovators, not women.

You feel being a house-wife is a "prison" because you grew up on feminist propaganda.

Finally, why get married? If you're just like a man, and both you and he work and take care of children, then why get married?

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

Well, I've already made my points showing the naturalness of the differences between men and women and their roles. Trying to dismiss them is, I believe, ultimately destructive to society, as we're seeing right now.

Yes, feminism reduces women to their reproductive organs because it declares there is nothing unique about women but their genitals/ovaries. ON all other areas they're just like men. Ofcourse, feminism says the same thing about men too. We're the same but for the bodies

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

[5]

One last point about feminsit hypocrisy: Feminists claims that the "evil patriarchy" reduces women to just child-reares and sex-objects, but in reality it is their movement that does since, since they claim that there is NO difference between men and women EXCEPT the child-birth and genitals.

Put it this way: under a feminist paradise, why should anyone get married if both men and women do the same thing? If we'll both change diapers and go to work, then why get married?

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

[4]

All these show that men and women ARE differenct and meant for different roles.

You say they should have a legal right, fine, but if due to moral/intellectual corruption enough men and women took that "right" to behave unnaturally, then society will malfunction. You think society will survive if all men stayed at home?

Further, feminism isn't content with just legal rights, sicne women already had that even before the 60's. They want to over-turn culture.

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

[3]

So, you have:

1-Logic: with external differences comes internal ones as well.

2-historic universality of these roles.

3-Prevalence in nature of male/female "gendered' roles.

4-The natural tendencies towards these "roles" by children regardless parental efforts (remember the David Reimer case?).

5-Continuing behavioral differences betwene men and women (in science/sex/physical activity) even after decades of feminist propaganda.

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

[2]

This is the way society works. Your "nurture only) theory doesn't work because how else to explain the near-universal prevalence of these traditional male/female roles? Unless you believe 50,000 years ago in E.Africa men conspired to "discriminate" and "oppress" women, leading to this universal prevalency, the there is no explanation but to accept its naturalness.

Add to that its appearance in our close primate relatives in some form or another.

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

[1]

I disagree. The difference between mena dn women go beyond those physical traits. Think about this: how can one have a physical trait without having a mentality to go with it?

With greater physical strength men will be more aggressive, otherwise what good is a man as shy of physical confrontation as a woman, and vice-versa?

With giving birth women will naturally be mentally-emotionally better-equipped to handle children. It's simply impossible for men to be equally so.

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

I don't think it's the same, since the French Revolution never challenged fundamental aspects of humanity like man/woman and family and child-raising, the existence of morality and spirituality. Feminism does.

And yes I am opposed to "equality of sexes" because equality assumes sameness, and when two are different and have different function, there can be no "equality".

[Vebinz]

@Sortsitar

You're right that some ideas of Marx was good, but the problem is the underlying pillar of them: namely that human societies, with their family and religion and competition and traditions, etc..., are wrong and must eb done away with to bring about some perfect utopia.

Feminists were influenced by this, thus their conviction that there is no male/female and that that all past societies are imperfect "patriarchies" to be done away with.

[Vebinz]

Very good and well-made video.

The only thing I disagree with is that feminism in general (atleast that of the 60's and later) is inspired by Marxist ideology. So in a sense all feminists are Marxist feminists.

[themaniusedtob]

All feminism is bad.

A tree may have different branches but it is still a tree..

Some nazi didnt agree with other nazi about the torture of jews but it wasnt enough to rock the boat... we dont say that not all nazi think alike because the group was formed on misinformation and greed.. a different type of feminist is like saying a different type of nazi..

Do you know what made that nazi boat rock?

Ending it once and for all.

the video was funny though

[keverc]

shut up and go make me something to eat

[dizzy365]

@keverc idiot

[keverc]

@dizzy365 lol

[No1LadyDiamante]

thanx, provided a nice form of revision

[TheLordmep]

"Not our fault that we're getten pregnant." that's my favorite one.

[faetrn]

I guess I'm a liberal feminist, then! XD

[TheReaverOfDarkness]

Hi Karen, this video is cute! Plus, I think you did a fantastic job of pointing out the differences between those three types of feminism. I didn't even know much about marxist feminism before I watched this!

[randomcrazyguy]

very , very nice video. a pity it hasnt gotten more views than it should have. the thing that put me off from watching the video at first was the title and the thumbnail. when i first glanced at it, i thought it was going to be another crazy feminazi video. it might work better with a better title to garner more appeal. and that thumbnail of the radical lady just scares people off. a thumbnail of the nice, liberal lady would be nice..

[TheReaverOfDarkness]

Perhaps the thumbnail of the radical feminist will draw in radical feminists, believing that this video will serve up some self-empowering yet ultimately blindsighted views to give them that strange feeling they seek to replace the warmth of love and friendship they never felt before. And then when they watch this video, they may be enlightened by it, and it could help to change the world one step at a time. :)

[cremebruleec]

LOL, this was a really good video! I love the radical feminist!! She's so po'd! Great video!