Added: 4 years ago
From: saultrain
Views: 24,663
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (71)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyonw who says there is no physical evidence that bigfoot exists obviously hasn't done their homework.

  • He will be vindicated soon. It is actually happening already as more people have the patience to listen to the findings and make up their own minds, rather than take other people's word for it that bigfoot is a myth. Recent PGF film enhancements are startling- showing muscle movements of the face and leg, and a herniated leg muscle. See gait analysis video with the rapid face movements. It certainly seems unlikely that Bob H. was the guy in the suit of bigfoot. DNA evidence is coming.

  • He is an associate professor----same education level as myself. Meldrum does NOT give any scientific evidence of bigfoot. As he always does he makes generalized generic statements and says in his OPINION they mean this or that. Opinions are not scientific evidence. What about meldrum trying to pass off an elk bone as a bigfoot bone? Does that sound like an honest investigator?

  • Yes Meldrum does wrap his Bigfoot talk in quasi-scientific lingo, however, like even the most inbred inatriculate bigfoot believer Meldrum has absolutely no proof of anything he claims.

  • He show proves through all this movie, u dont want proofs u want body

    Troll more, but he is profesor on university, he is making public presentations, u are just lifeless nerds with not even 1/10 of his knowlage

  • @seymourbbest The difference between you and Meldrum is that Meldrum analyzes the evidence and lets the viewers/readers/audience draw their own conclusions, whereas the only thing you do is barbarically throw around insults-showcasing your bias. Meldrum is a great scientist, and he has not been dishonest about anything-making him a hero to many. You are no one's hero. You don't analyze anything, or bring anything to the debate other than aggression and unjustified bias.

  • That's the luxury of being a bigfooter---you can make all sorts of crazy statements and never have to back any of it up. From Jeff Meldrum to your local Bigfoot nut---they never back anything up with scientific evidence.

  • @seymourbbest Yeah check out Finding Bigfoot on the Animal Planet for perfect representation of the average bigfooter. I'll give Dr. Meldrum credit though because he at least articulates his thoughts in a cohesive manner and doesn't assume every bump in the night is a bigfoot.

  • I love all the morons putting forward their "theories" about bigfoot. No one cares in your made up theories you dumbfucks. It's not a mythical or paranormal beast its a normal biological creature if it exists you idiots.

  • Cryptozoology novel about two boys who find something strange on the beach one night see video book trailer

  • you clueless idiot nastygirl. i told you the patterson film could in fact be a hoax. but that is not important because the footprints alone are proof positive. your an idiot and you don't even know it. explain to me how a hoaxer could walk over a 5 to 6 foot fence without breaking stride? Chew on that fat head.

  • @weakling01 more utter fucking babble..from another geek troll..they never existed moron..only in the minds of geeks like you and komo

  • @nastymonsters2 why do you go on all these videos trolling and denying this completely? If you don't agree that sasquatchs don't exist. Then why don't you grow up and get the fuck off these videos you little fat lifeless cunt. You're the "nerd" and "geek" here. trolling each vid about sasquatch every fucking night. Stupid arrogant prick. I hope you die.

  • More sad troll spam...

  • lol its 6ft fucking 4 you troll. even the fat fuck in the video with the lifesize blow up is the same size ..you truly are a fucking clueless troll. its a shitty suit and nothing more you total geek..serial killers lol bob h is not a serial killer you troll. the leading poly tester in the US did the second test and said hes telling the truth..case closed on you and the sad bigfoot geeks, human sized head human walk.human in a shitty suit you peado.

  • @nastymonsters2 your the one who sounds like he needs a life you actually search bigfoot videos etc just to insult us we all have our intrests yours is clearly stalking serial killers bit of a strange hobby something i suggest you getting help for before you do something stupid.

    You keep to your sad little life because truly no one gives a fuck what you say since Top scientists cant work out the 1960s Sasquatch footage and there are out there

  • @anevilpigeon only sad fuck is you and the other clueless geeks.trolling its real oooh look cnt be a suit. Well knobhead it's a suit. BIGFOOT never existed .only in the minds of nerds like you .as Seymour Said meldum is an associate. And I for one have far Mir primate experience than tht conman. Go get a signed fake cast off him for 60$.you gullible idiot. Mean time fuck off and thumbs up komo and the other clueless geeks.

  • @nastymonsters2 Lol im def not a nerd since i dont sit at home all day playing world of warcraft like you do as i see you upload videos of it, as i said its our beleave everyone has a diffrent beleave you decide to have a small frail mind what gets inpressed when you turn the fire on wondering how it works, i and many people on here decide the opionion of having an open mind im not going to reply to you again as i cant be borther to waste my time on benfit scroungers like yourself

  • @anevilpigeon your done moron. One post me a link to any video I've loaded about anything.dickhead.two.learn to spell belief you silly little boy.benefit scrounger.are you on crack you braindead troll

  • @nastymonsters2 I like to know how im the troll when your the one whos insulting everyone who posts a comment..

  • @nastymonsters2 Who seems to be a little 12 year old kid who sits on his larry

  • Serial killers have passed your silly polys, that fact alone disqualifies your uncle BobbaH. Roger couldn't 'botch any suit together', he was no f/x guy and we know what they were up to back then; POTA, 2001, that sort of thing and surprise, surprise, they didn't look real but like actors. As they were, and as every other BF movie suit's ever been before and since. Obvious tall guys. There is no human sized head here, Patty's way too big like her whole body height is. Feet normal fat. Freak.

  • explain the sagittal crest on a biped. one with a human sized head.explain the scapula which is square.and if it were real would be a major dislocation as its sticking out past the side of the body.and its doesn't move.its a shoulder pad you dumb troll. her hair lol stfu .you really are a clueless geek. fake clown feet faked padded static arse. fuck off and spout you bullshit elsewhere troll

  • stfu komocunt its bob h in a suit. two polygraphs passed.any passed by the conman gimlin?? no.as he will get owned.just like you do when you babble on here every day."HER" lmao its a fucking shitty ape suit botched together by roger. and its a fucking seam where the suit,its a subduction where the two halves of the suit over lap you clueless troll. you just copy other trolls post and have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.you totally clueless troll

  • BobH is not in the PGF, that's from the intended documentary with horseback stuff shot in Washington. He has a walk only superfically resembling Patty's but he locks his knee, she never does, guess it took him 40 years of trying... Her hair is like you'd expect from a being living in rough wilderness, spotty if you like, see any other hairy primate. Besides it's sunlight hitting her so the seam line skeptics pretend is there is simply skin, from other angles you don't see it - but you see skin.

  • Comment removed

  • BobH was in reel 2 of the Patterson film/documentary he was making (see Patterson-Gimlin film on Wikipedia). Combine that with the classic gait of BobH and, guess what, he's your Bigfoot. The fur looks synthetic/shiny, the eyes have a cutout appearance and no mouth. Anyone believing this is real after all these years is HI-larious!!! It's about probability folks...all of the above combined with Patterson going out planning to shoot a Bigfoot, and golly-gee, he does just that?

    Whatever!!! LOL

  • This means that Sasquatchs can´t run... just walk slower or faster.

    Just to add a little bit of light about some fake footages out there...

    ; )

  • Do Bigfoot tracks look like it's an animal to you? Not to me, humanlike feet, please... This isn't a minor issue but a very important one, something's making those tracks and unless you're mad and think they're all fake or by some known creature (anything but an unknown of course), then we have these creatures out there making them... All these things found, on Patty or on the ground, that you call hoaxes are all great proof waiting to be substantiated by a specimen...

  • I think this constant squabble over foot prints and PGF illustrate the Bigfoot debate quite clearly----Bigfooters always want to debate a side issue because there isn't any proof of Bigfoot so they'll divert the debate to silliness like prints. How about Meldrum explain how we can have prints but no animal to make them?debating the bottom of bigfoot feet is like debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

  • No, footprints don't all show ridges evidently, it all depends on how it stepped, and on the soil and its state when you found it...

  • Oh ok so that's how it works--footprints embraced as the real thing years ago and called bigfoot proof are now being called fake and quietly slipped out of collections because they didn't have dermal ridges like prints do now.So then a few years down the road Bigfooters will say "see ALL the prints have dermal ridges".If you have to constantly update your "evidence" then you aint got any evidence,you've just got the latest hoax.

  • Dead wrong as always, seymour, it's really becoming a habit isn't it... What Meldrum will or won't discuss I don't think any of us know, but fact is dermal ridges is not some new cool invention - they've been found in very old prints as well. So get off that rocking horse now...

  • Like I said Meldrum will talk about dermal ridges in recent tracks BUT why won't he address the lack of dermal ridges and mid tarsal breaks in those tracks collected 40 or 50 years ago? Why are those old tracks flat and featureless like a board?

  • @seymourbbest Because many of the tracks from that era were left by hoaxers. Others were found either in shallow woods or close to roads where the ground is much more compacted, making the prints appear more rigid. A mid tarsal break would not be apparent in highly compacted areas, nor would the dermal ridges, however there were some. These characteristics began to appear yrs later when extremely remote, less trodden areas became easier & safer to reach via advanced transportation & technology.

  • @seymourbbest pt 2. -- Having said that, many of the very best casted prints came from that era - Example - the casts made from a creature whose left foot had been badly broken/mangled at some time in the distant past. Unfortunately, the healing process left it quite crippled & deformed. When found, the stride of the creature was grossly affected by the injury. The entire process in this case made the chance of it being hoaxed almost non-existent. These prints came from the 60's.

  • Footprints from 20 years ago have been found to have dermals....if the truth were to be known, all of Meldrum's forays into the field, travel expenses and lodgings are paid out of his own pocket...It's funny that anyone that writes a pro-Bigfoot book is accused of doing so only for money, thus nothing they say can be trusted..one can assume from this logic that books written by authors must be written purely for altruistic philanthropic reasons, or they are not to be believed...

  • Poor Jeff.

  • good:)

  • Dirt entered some of the tracks, therefore big foot exists!

  • if there are there in the woods, how many are still alive?, why are they so elusive? why was such a huge creature not found till now?

    if these are fakes, then there outstanding fakes.

  • They're very much still alive today. They have been found for centuries throughout N. America, Eastern Europe, parts of Russia and Australia. Part of the reason they are so elusive is because you're dealing with a primate that borders on a human level of intelligence. The yowie in Australia has been found to be as big if not a bit bigger than ours and they've found crude tools that it's made.

  • if there are there in the woods, how many are still alive?, why are they so elusive? why was such a huge creature not found till now?

    if these are fakes, then there outstanding fakes.

  • COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!

  • are u serious? This is very compelling.

  • This is one class I might not have dozed off in! Keep it up Dr. Meldrum...there are a lot of people that will be eating a ton of crow one day....!

  • i am surprised brother..being canadian and all you sound like one of these ignorant americans on here about this subject...i am disappointed in you ...i thought you would know better....here in BC the creature is a matter of fact.

  • forgive me i read your message wrong...my bad brother...my mistake

  • interesting

  • Great presentation!! :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more