Added: 1 year ago
From: liamh2
Views: 14,508
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Give Me Liberty or give me death" - Patrick Henry.

  • For Christ sake, get Ron Paul into the White House, he's the only one that can pass the polygraph test. I just can tell by his voice tone and eye movement that he's 100% honest. I have not seen any politician like RP in years. Ron Paul 2012.

  • Once again Ralph Nader nails it. The corrupt two party system that rigs it for no one else to participate. The crime kingpin currently is Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama.

  • paul does talk about property rights so if the state next to you damages your property you go to court.

  • Ron Paul 2012!

    Give Ron Paul his media do, Thumbs up if believe in him and start the revolution by passing it on!

    Keep the interNet Free!

  • -if U R a disillusioned Dem /independent, in at least 18 states , U must register REPUB to vote Ron Paul in the critical primary which wins the nomination! MANY do not know this - don;t be cheated out of a vote, don't let Ron Paul be cheated out of the nomination.Some closed states are: AZ,CO,CT,DE,FL,NY,PA,LA,KY,NE,­­­NC,OR,OK,MD,SD,UT,WV,DC AND MORE ! Ron Paul might have been better off running as a DEM actually -system is flawed,play the game, reg. REPUB for thus man to win !

  • He does not like regulations because he believes in the free market. Most regulations favor the very group being regulated, in other words it's mostly protectionist legislation! That's why Ron Paul would not attempt to regulate the market - it regulates itself- provided it's a tryly free market; i.e. forbidden cancer cures in this country, patent laws favoring bad business practices, and government waste at it's worst - the FDA vs. Dr. Burzynski.

    I'm voting for Ron Paul in 2012!

  • This guy would be an awesome vice president for Ron Paul

  • Obama is atool . deal w3ith it!!!!!@

  • Ralph Nader appericate independent thought even if it's not his own

  • @Democratsaresmart, still not smart enough to find the caps lock button.

    Ron Paul has outlined many ways that he will create jobs, you've commented on so many of his clips maybe you should watch a couple. Sound money and low taxs for all meaning people could save and invest money without it being stolen from them through inflation for a start!! Read some Rothbart books my friend!

  • Paul and Nader are men of integrity, unlike Obama. I just watched a youtube video of a good article by Sheldon Richman on the two of them.

  • '...Take the debates away from the parties.'

    Not likely, Ralph so long as the U.S. has a winner-take-all election system Rule-by-Majority diluted democracy.

    Until Proportional Representation (PR) democracy is the system nothing will change.

  • So is it Ron Paul for 2012?

  • @newsworthyable YES SIR

  • I like Ralph Nader, but his comment at 4:10 is one of the reasons I shy away from him. I'm sick of "Health and Safety" issues . That's exactly where we got the CPSC from and they're totally out of control these days.

  • I love Ron Paul but not Ralph Nader. My Corvair never killed anyone.

  • I Like Ron Paul. I'm not a huge Libertarian, but if he ran w/ Nader they'd have my vote. It'll never happen though, so screw it... screw them all.

  • I like Nader and Paul but Nader is wrong at 4:10. Paul has talked exactly about that before.

  • Statesman Ron Paul is one of the few leading men in the Nation who can lead the U.S. on the Wise & Prudent Path to American Strength.

  • Nader is the only socialist I like. He calls out everyone and has been delivering the same message for years. Much respect though I'm a libertarian.

  • @yojimbo81 Yeah, that's the same reason why I like Dr. Paul. Even though I disagree with him, he's at least honest and consistent. That' all you can ask for in an opponent.

  • @jessc1979 Ron Paul's positions are rooted in common sense and cannot be debunked with facts. His book A Foreign Policy of Freedom was a real eye opener. You will see the light one day, my friend :)

  • @yojimbo81 Not all his positions... don't start gloating. His arguments for abortions are whack for example.

    I think a debate between Nader and Paul would see Nader routing him.

  • @jessc1979 How is leaving abortion up to the state, and not being a mandated federal thing a "bad" view? The way the system is now, you are not allowed to live in an area with like views because everyone is forced into the view of the federal government. What ron paul wants, and why he wants it (States rights) is a system where a person has the right to choose a state that best fits their views. For example, California could have more liberal laws, gay marriage etc, while Iowa could stay Cons

  • @yojimbo81 Thats what I respect about the man. He's consistent and even if I disagree with his position at least I know he won't just change his mind willy-nilly and try to con me.

  • @yojimbo81 good hearts attract good hearts. regardless of their ideology or message.

  • @yojimbo81 He's not a socialist, he's a progressive. There is a difference and some similarities but they are different forms of government.

  • Thanks for 8 years of Bush Nader, you know what you did, and that is why you won't run again, next time you might help elect Sarah Palin, and we know you wouldn't be able to live with yourself if that happened.

    So, how is the Green party doing?

  • @SurlytheCLown What did Ralph Nader do? Look at the numbers. Al Gore couldn't win his home state despite the fact they sent him to the senate and went to Clinton in '92 and '96. Had Gore won Tennessee he would have won the election. Gore was a joke and so are you if you believe the crap you say.

  • @SurlytheCLown 8 years of Bush? So it was Nader's fault in 2004 too even though he was a non-factor? Some people say that they don't know of a single 2000 Nader voter who voted for Nader in 2004. So let's say Kerry got a lot of the Nader voters. So why did he lose?

    Because he lost votes to Bush because of his shitty campaign.

    You Democrats need to stop making excuses for yourself and take the blame for losing an election *twice* that you should've landslided!

  • Always liked Nader, never expected him to like Dr. Paul.  Kudos.

  • @mdrdrm water etc can be owned fully by individuals or used by many different individuals who create contract. there should be penalty for aggression theft contractual fraud

  • @sillynanny44 in free market water etc can be fully owned by individuals & it can be used by  many differnt individuals who create contract.*

  • @mdrdrm there should be penalty for those who initiate force(including pollution) on private property. thieves & those who commit contractual fraud should be penalized too. individuals can create contracts for properties if they want. govt can enforce the contracts by penalizing those who illegally break them. continue.

  • nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney

    free your mind & the rest will follow

  • Nader stands by 80% of what Ron Paul stands for. In a nat'l political area that is incredible.

    I ask any blue blood Nader supporter to get behind RonPaul 2012. He is as honorable a man as America can offer.

  • I think Nader is wrong about Paul's position on an accountable central bank. Paul want's to abolish the central bank entirely. Nader probably isn't for that.

  • @zardozcs

    plus nader supports the globalist united nations which are making plans for a global gun ban treaty.

  • Obama is an "Uncle Tom" like Nader once said he might be.

  • During the last obnoxious election, I know of only two people who were granted airtime by mainstream media outlets to portray Obama as the puppet of corporate/Israeli/financial interests that he really is: Nader and Paul.

    James Petras did so more eloquently, but I'd be surprised to ever see him on American TV.

  • Ron Paul is worse then Hitler. JAM A SPORK DOWN MY THROAT! What is the draw to this loon?

  • @TheHomelandDefender you must love Ron Paul why would you spend so much time commenting on videos that only mention him like this one? show one example where Ron Paul went against his oath to defend and uphold the US constitution? and just tell me when and I would be happy to jam that spork down your throat.

  • @TheHomelandDefender You call another man hitler then you call him a loon? Please shut the fuck up.

  • @TheHomelandDefender hes not just a loon, hes a liberal loon

  • If he was elected in 2000, this shit hole pretendind to be a country may have been saved.

  • yeah i was ready to vote for him but had to go third party last time

  • If some men are entitled by rights to products of the work of others, it means that those others being forced to provide are deprived of their rights and are condemned to slave labor. There can be no such thing as the right to enslave even for the welfare of others.

  • Dr. Ron Paul for President in 2012 and Ralph Nader for VP in 2012!!

  • @99minerkc Ron Paul would NEVER have Nader as VP. Nader is a Socialist.

  • @yakyakyak69 youtube search "conservative ralph nader" and joint press conference and ron paul and ralph nader together with wolf blitzer. the two would never run together agreed. the paul kucinich 2012 youtube account has some video's that even I was stunned to see paul and kucinich gush over each other

  • @yakyakyak69 but most importantly "conservative ralph nader" video I think you should watch. ralph had a website during the election named constitution pledge if you search it you can find a video about it too

  • @jacobpsweeney Yep, Ralph Nader is a Statist who hates the Free Market.

    Want REAL Constitutional Liberty?

    Ron Paul, President with Judge Andrew Napolitano as VP!

  • Here is a list of legislation that Ralph Nader was instrumental in passing. Clean Air Act Clean Water Act Consumer credit disclosure law Consumer Product Safety Act Co-Op Bank Bill Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Freedom of Information Act Funeral home cost disclosure law Law establishing Environmental Protection Agency
  • Ralph Nader created and passed...

    Medical Devices safety Act

    Mine Health and Safety Act

    Mobile home safety

    National Automobile and Highway Traffic Safety Act

    National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act

    Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act

    Nuclear power safety

  • Ralph Nader created and passed...

    Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)

    Pension protection law

    Safe Water Drinking Act

    Tire safety & grading disclosure law

    Whistleblower Protection Act

    Wholesome Meat Act

    Wholesome Poultry Product Act

  • He's used every time to divide the votes during an election, knowing that he can't win, then he can be a happy camper running off with all those donations.

  • I'm glad Nader said that thing about Paul getting on the debates. I've wanted to write Ralph for years to encourage him to run in the Democratic primaries and Paul proved why.

    Nader talks about lack of media coverage for his campaign and what it could do if they had 40 mil.

    Paul set records for raising money and raised according about 35 mil. This from a guy who was unknown 3 years ago.

    Nader's been nationally known for 45 years now and hold majoritarian views. Surely he could do better!

  • I'm sorry, is Nader stupid or just a provocateur...hey Ralph, take a look outside your window. Obama barely pasted health care reform that lacks a strong public option (much less a single payer plan), and that bill pasted by less then a dozen votes. And in response it started a right wing movement that boarders on an insurrection. Ralph, your nagging of Obama is a waste of time. Get out there and start fighting for your single payer plan or shut up.

  • @thequietkid10 Are you aware of Single Player Action? And other groups he's organized for Single payer. In addition, most Americans don't know what Single Payer is so it's necessary to speak out about it.

  • i uploaded a video with nader speech in it that has 3842 views in two weeks but youtube removed it from search terms like ralph nader and took it out of related videos at the top of the 5 million view plus version

  • youtube search conservative ralph nader by the southernavenger account jack hunter

  • All GOP & DEMS are Fake Wrestling Actors & the CEO of this Stage Show are Health Insurance Giants, Wall Street Banks, War Industry, Israel, AIPAC, PNAC, JINSA, CFR, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oil Industry, and Corporate Lobbyists. Washington DC the City of Deception & USA Backstabbing which contains Two Fascist Neocon Parties who are the Same - Two Wings of the Corporations, Neocons, Zionists, Bankers, War & Federal Reserve Cabal who owns USA, all USA politics will ever do is Deceive & Betray YOU.

  • @halcyon0830

    congratulations, I have never seen so many buzz words put into one youtube post. You sir must be a follower of Frank Lunz.

  • America has NO Capitalism, America ONLY HAS Corporatism.

    America has NO Democracy, America ONLY HAS Plutocracy.

    America has NO Constitution, America ONLY HAS US Patriot Act.

    America has NO Politicians or Reps, America ONLY HAS Neocon Corporate-Owned Lobbyists working ONLY for Corporations and Special Interests like AIPAC/PNAC

    America has NO Political Parties, America ONLY HAS NEOCONS AND AIPAC IN WASHINGTON AND NEOCONS & ZIONISTS IN POWER.

    Biggest LIE Ever Created: "USA is Land of the Free"

  • Obama is a Republican. A Very Right-Wing GOP. Thanks to Triangulation gone wild.

    informationclearinghouse. info/article25123. htm

    greanvillepost. com/?p=5165

    Almost EVERY SINGLE US President that existed before Obama, ALL OF THEM WERE FAR MORE SOCIALIST AND LIBERAL THAN OBAMA.

    Nixon, Eisenhower, Bush Sr, Ford, & even Reagan, they were ALL More Liberal & More Left-Wing than Obama. I am Serious.

    Choosing Neocon McCain OR Neocon Obama IS THE SAME THING, Neocon Dem & Neocon GOP are SAME PARTY.

  • @halcyon0830

    Except both parties are globalists, AIPAC is just part of a bigger picture, this is a plan for a new world order and believe me, it is not good.

    They are planning to launch the UN Small arms treaty, people should wake up.

    this is not a battle between liberals or conservatives, those mean nothing, this is battle between globalists and americans.

  • is. gd/bcSgS

    newsnet14. com/2010/01/14/mossad-tied-to-­'underwear-bomber'

    veteranstoday. com/2010/02/06/oen-crotch-bomb­er-tied-to-mossad-msm-cover-st­ories-debunked

    veteranstoday. com/2009/12/30/is-israel-contr­olling-phony-terror-news

    documentarywire. com/911-missing-links

    tvnewslies. org/tvnl/index.php/news/911-re­lated/13473-full-el-al-flight-­took-off-on-911-from-jfk-to-te­l-aviv.html

    current. com/items/90637131_how-mossad-­controls-our-political-parties­.htm

    takeourworldback. com/itwasntmuslims.htm

  • America SPENDS 1.8 TRILLION DOLLARS ON WARS AND THE PENTAGON EVERY SINGLE YEAR.

    And The Corporate-Brainwashed Fucks-News-Puppet Tea Party Zombie Cult NEVER MENTIONS THAT WHEN THEY TELL THE GOVERNMENT TO REDUCE SPENDING.

    America has 900 Military Bases Worldwide and America has given more than 3 TRILLION dollars to Israel since the 50s but the Corporate-Neocon-Zionist Tools Tea Party Stays Quiet.

    All TeaPartiers are supposed to be Anti-War Anti-Corruption Pro-Liberalism Pro-Third-Party Members.

  • Limbaugh, Murdoch, CNN, MSNBC & ALL NEOCON MEDIA have 1 GOAL, & that is to keep the Two Party Fascist Corporate-Owned System going, they want ALL Americans to be Divided ONLY as Democrat or Republican, they know Obama is doing everything they want and they are on Obama's side & Obama is on their side, but they have to ACT like Wrestling Actors, ACT like they hate each other. Neocon Corporate-Owned Israel-Owned US Politics is Fake Wrestling & Acting, No 3rd parties allowed, No Democracy allowed.

  • I like Nader a lot, but I think he is a bit mistaken about Dr. Paul's stand regarding the FED: I think Ron Paul doesn't believe in an "accountable central bank".... I think he says that he believes in NO central bank.

  • "Currently, preemptive regulations and pay-to-pollute schemes favor those wealthy enough to perform the regulatory tap dance, while those who own the polluted land rarely receive a quick or just resolution to their problems."

    [end]

    To read more on Ron Paul's issue stances go here: ronpaulforcongress. com/html/issues.html

  • "In a free market, no one is allowed to pollute his neighbor's land, air, or water. If your property is being damaged, you have every right to sue the polluter, and government should protect that right. After paying damages, the polluter's production and sale costs rise, making it unprofitable to continue doing business the same way."

    [cont]

  • @iFreedom4ever

    The problem with depending on litigation to solve the problems of the environment though is that fact that it could take years to get compensation for the damages they caused you. There is also the fact that the big corporations often have the cash to hire better lawyers than you or I and would; likely forcing a more favorable ruling for the polluting corporation.

    I agree with Paul that the current environment policy is ineffective but there does need to be some regulations.

  • "The key to sound environmental policy is respect for private property rights. The strict enforcement of property rights corrects environmental wrongs while increasing the cost of polluting."

    [contd]

  • Sorry Ralph you are wrong about Ron regarding the environment. The following is direct from his issue page:

    I believe that a lack of respect for property rights has led to many [environmental] problems.

    "The federal government has proven itself untrustworthy with environmental policy by facilitating polluters, subsidizing logging in the National Forests, and instituting one-size-fits-all approaches that too often discriminate against those they are intended to help."

    [cont]

  • Obama = Bush

    Obama = Bush

    Obama = Bush

  • @oceanbound222

    You forgot something

    NWO = Obama

  • Yes! Ron Paul is against pollution and is for health care safety! To say he is not is a complete lie. If anything a person or a company does that infridges another person rights or someone's elses property he specifically is against it! Period!

  • Ron Paul isn't against pollution and health care safety regulation. He's specifically stated that certain things like pollution safeguard regulations are needed because there is no free market incentive that'll cause self regulation when it comes to pollution. Nader is 100% right when he says we need to get 3rd party candidates in the debates.

  • @DrRonPaul2012 Ron Paul stands against safety regulation as he should. Monopolized government regulatory systems do not benefit consumers. Consumer protection should happen in the marketplace. The market place is also very good at protecting the environment if there is accountability. Pay to pollute is not accountability. It is the opposite. If you harm people with your industrial byproducts you should be held accountable under natural common law. Enforce the basics stop adding new laws.

  • @neue01 @DrRonPaul2012 Pay to pollute is WORSE than no accountability!!! It is a license to infringe on the property rights of others. Ron Paul is an AWESOME advocate of liberty and Individual Rights. Your description about Monopolized government systems is G R E A T !

  • @DrRonPaul2012 I think Dr. Paul has also said - in a 2008 nationally televised debate - that pollution is a violation of individual rights, and that is why it is proper to make it against the law.

  • @DrRonPaul2012 WRONG you dont have a clue about paul's view on pollution/h.c. he support priv. property this free market characteristic incentivize ppl to care about their own property.contracts is another characteristic where ppl need permission to pollute on owner's property. in capitalism govt puts ppl in jail for damaging priv property. DONT LIE making a baseless assumption is constitute a LIE. in h.c he want priv sector to run it, jail for criminals NOT govt controling conducts

  • @sillynanny44 He's specifically stated that certain things like pollution safeguard regulations are needed because there is no free market incentive that'll cause self regulation when it comes to pollution.

  • @DrRonPaul2012 tell me the site where he says that... theres plenty source that proves he said that private property = incentive to protect property... plenty of sources show where he talks about govt protecting contracts (permission to pollute owner's property) govt protecting property by putting people who damage property in jail. paul is AGAINST govt controling conduct of individuals he is AGAINST govt management of businesses. show me your sites. are you a fake libertarian?

  • @sillynanny44 continue... free market = private property which means govt puts people in jail who pollute other people's property w/o permission. he is against govt controling the conducts of individuals. "drronpaul2012" read my previous comments because you dont seem to know anything about libertarianism/ron paul's message.

  • @sillynanny44 continue.. govt ruined h.c w/ inflation, by mandating hmo, bureacracies, elimination of competition etc. paul wants to get rid of govt involvment in h.c also. libertarianism = jail for criminals NOT govt managing behavior..

  • @sillynanny44 it's not on a website. he stated it himself in a recent interview. i think you're confused though. He's specifically stated that certain things like pollution safeguard regulations are needed because there is no free market incentive that'll cause self regulation when it comes to pollution. Corporations can save big bucks if they can dump their crap. That's what he meant by there not being any "free market incentive that'll cause self regulation when it comes to pollution"

  • @DrRonPaul2012 where is proof that he did such an interview where he says that?? paul is against govt control of conduct. he believes that private property/free market = incentive to care about property. he believes in contracts, if anyone wants to pollute he/she needs the permission of the property owner. if they dont have permission they should go to jail. "certain things" FOR ALL THINGS he simply want jail for aggressor/fraud criminal NOT GOVT MANAGEMENT. you are a FAKE libertarian.

  • @sillynanny44 if polluters* dont have permission they should go to jail. "DrRonPaul2012" again where is the proof that dr. paul actually said that. ive been asking you this ad nauseam... read my previous comment.

  • @sillynanny44 hey. i've seen the interview where ron paul believes in pollution regulation. i just can't remember the title. but a friend of mine and i, who understand property rights, were watching it and looked at each other funny when he said 'free market, except for things like (i forget) and pollution controls." if i can think of the youtube title i'll post it. but drronpaul2012 isn't making that shit up. ron paul definitely said those things.

  • @tmac9938 he believes in rule of law. he's not for arbitrary govt "laws". libertarians like paul believes in property rights which means penalty for damaging other ppls property which includes pollution. so u dont understand what he's saying. its either he didnt say he want regulation or he said regulation in the context where it's defined as libertarian/FM law(property rights where govt protects our property and defend rule of law rather than commiting the crimes itself). nader wants statism.

  • @sillynanny44 yeah and i think you're right. ron justifies pollution regulation within the confines of property rights. if public air is dirty due to your private pollution, then you are infringing on my property rights. and i think that's where ron paul stands in that interview i'm remembering. so it sounds like we're both right, including ronpaul2012. but i can't find the interview...

  • @sillynanny44: You are amazing! You not just know what Ron Paul believes, but assumes that Ralph Nader misunderstood something that you don't know what it is, but you are quite sure that it could be only two possibilities. The bonus is that you also knows what Nader really wants. Are you one of those who were 'awaken' by Alex Jesus Jones?

  • @strattfordcrass lol smartmouth huh? no assumptions in my comments =p

  • @sillynanny44 lol

  • @sillynanny44 @sillynanny44 I know what the fuck you're saying punk and i agree. the real problem is you think i'm saying shit i'm not saying. The fact is if a company can dump some toxic crap on their "own" property and save big bucks they'll do it. That's the point ron paul was trying to say. If you want to find it go look at my ron paul video playlist you shit head....and i you don't like being called names maybe you shouldn't do it in the first place you cock sucker.

  • @DrRonPaul2012 which video is it in? the things i just said was what ron paul has been saying all along and they go in conflict w/ your claims. you are a fake libertarian because you dont believe in free markets. "!@#$ sucker" "punk" "sh*t head" all those nonsense only shows what you're reduced to. again what is the name of your proof video. i watch interviews of paul and i never heard him say anything like the things you said.

  • @sillynanny44: Can I be a punk (rocker) and believe in free (markets), chief?

  • @DrRonPaul2012 your account is too important ignore the bs

  • @sillynanny44 and also jail for thieves

  • @DrRonPaul2012 Paul was huge on the internet before 08 debates usually the one issue and about the only one i tend to agree with is private prisons issue nader peeps go after Paul on. Both guys have huge key similarities that are too important to go nit picking over minor issues like both stated in their joint press conference before decision08.

  • USA was NEVER supposed to be a Fascist or Totalitarian nation, a Corptocracy, a Communist nation or a Runaway Capitalism where Greed & Deception Rules above all. USA's a Constitutional Republic, a Social Democratic Republic, our Reps were chosen to WORK FOR us (their Constituents) NOT the lobbyists, neocons, zionists, israel, military industrial complex, nwo, federal reserve, corporations & special interests that want to put millions in politician's bank accounts.

    Solution= Nader/Paul/Kucinich

  • @halcyon0830 I agree. I would make a HUGE distinction though between Corporatism--what you're calling runaway capitalism--and liberal capitalism. A liberal market is a free market and in the end is a benefit to the people and a deterrent of monopolistic corporatism. Business does not want the competition and uncertainty of a free liberal market. They want the predictability and control found in a controlled statist marketplace. Enter the lobbyist. ;)

  • Obama makes me want to RALPH!!!

    I love RALPH NADER!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more