I believe that refusal is harmful act. Incompatibility to be in harmony. I believe refusal might be considered as an act of war!
What do you mean by being infringed or violated? How would a present(presentment, statement) be a trespass? I believe some person is willing to serve another and the another is bluntly refusing to accept the gift.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The "act of war" theory is not supported by law or practice. If your neighbor offers to build a buddhist temple in your front yard, a simple notice of refusal is the accepted and customary way of dealing with that. There is no war. There was an offer and a refusal. There is peace. The offer had no authority so refusal is honorable and rightful.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM "If there was a refusal how can there be peace?" Peace may have been already been lost by the unfair or coercive nature of the offer. If "peace" can only be restored by capitulation, then tyranny may be performed by making simple courteous offers. You have no peace when you have slaughtering tyrants who make offers which empower themselves. Human dignity, rights and destiny must be defended, sometimes, to PREVENT a loss of "peace".
@minivanjack I enjoyed the conversation with you very much. I believe we have agreed on some points in some way and that's what matters. Now, let me terminate it, would that be OK? : )
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Our legal system and our culture do not see acceptance of gifts as obligatory. You may be referencing another national culture. In that mindset someone could offer you a "gift" of a bullet in the head and you would have no recourse to refuse. You would be required to stand still as the gun was fired.
@minivanjack well would you not agree that you have a moral obligation to the person to accept his service to you? He's offering you value, money, no?
I believe the example of a bullet in the head is a bit extreme, but let's say that you would not disagree with him on that matter, but "conditional acceptance" you would present him consequences of his action = death by your friend.
Would he chose to accept or would he rather offer a termination of the agreement? That's the question, isn't it?
@minivanjack 1. Yes, so?2. How can you deny my right, trespassing?My friend would do a lawful act, wouldn't he? By lawful, warranted is meant 3Threat...doh...It could be defined as presentment(suggestion, notice) for consideration. By the law of war I would be in right by him threatening me with the gun in the first place would I not?4 Yes, he might, why does that matter?5 Can you state your assertion in another words as I may not know what you mean? It might be bad example in the first place...
2) You cannot control how your friend will react to your attempted recruitment. Your friend has personal free will.
3) He didn't threaten. He offered. There is no violation of law.
4) It matters because your involuntary violent death matters.
5) Hoping to create "harmony" you accept an offer of violence against you. That is unharmonious for you. Your acceptance of the offer does not create harmony.
@minivanjack 1)I belive that he would not be an idiot and rather choose to terminate his agreement, or maybe Believe is not the right word, I would hope so to be honest, lol.
2)Thats why we have trusts, oaths and things like that, he would be making treason if he fails to honor that. I would be dead but if i woulnd't be stupid I would make sure he would face the consequences of that.
3)Exactly, you might define that this way also. That why the "Do you understand me" is so important in my belief.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The example was extreme, but perfectly applicable to other circumstances. If I make an offer of seafood, and you are allergic to seafood, you may refuse in honor. In fact, you don't need an allergy, or any other excuse. You just need to respectfully state your position. That is honorable refusal. Never allow yourself to be trapped by a manipulative offer.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The do you understand thing, where some persons claim it to be "do you stand under me" is in my belief rather a thing of comprehending what he might be saying to you. He says one thing, you think another, he asks you whether you get it and you say yes. But he never defined the words he used and he might have meant something else then you think the words mean. And I think that this is what him the right to let's say arrest you or similar thing. He gets the warrant. Same refusal
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Your sentence structure is not clear. All the warrant does is give the enforcer some encouragement by, sometimes, a corrupt court, to use force on you. You are then under threat of force and you will be harmed if you do not submit to force. This is no longer an offer. It is a threat of assault by overwhelming force.
@minivanjack Youtube is really bad for commenting and discussions I'm finding.
But as I said, this example is very bad in it's nature and also quite improbable to happen...
I know there are some bad persons but I am rather choosing to assume that the world is good, honorable, gracious and graceful so I can react to that accordingly.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The evidence of evil and cruelty are easily found. Only by denial are they not seen. When you presume all others to be good you empower and enable those who are not.
@minivanjack Yes, but if you are coming to a transaction with this dangerous belief of there is evil and cruelty you might wrong those who are not and that of itself is not noble, gracious and good, which is what we kinda all are looking for in my belief, isn't it?
@minivanjack The persons do the harm to each other by being disgraceful, dishonorable... and I believe that's why we have the structure of the system we have today... I don't believe that people are harming themselves, really, brotherhoods and stuff... I think that these are for the protection from the persons...
@minivanjack The "problem" is would he honor his agreements or would he do treason?
The reason why did I offer the act of war (offence by refusal) is because I believe/am thinking that that is where police get the warrant to use force against your person... is that not what happens when you refuse their request of you?
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM "Service" is defined by the "Server" and it may, in the eyes of the recipient be violence, tyranny or harm. You are suggesting that by offering anything and calling it a gift you have right of command over other sovereigns. The "obligation to accept an offer" is a manipulative construct which assaults and diminishes the right of self-determination. You may not become someone's master by offering something to them. You must have consent.
@minivanjack Let's agree that it may be considered as a violence.It is a obligation of his to notify the server of his understanding if he wants later to have a remedy, right?Why are you stirring a right to command in this scenario of obligation to pay money.You have at all times right of self-determination, but you are also presented with an offer that you would have to deal with and all I'm suggesting is that you might want to accept it so the value, money, may be created.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM If an offer is not a trespass then neither is a refusal. There are evil people, evil intentions and evil proposals. It is not creating "harmony" to acquiesce. Those offers may, in honor, be refused. To accept a destructive offer is not to create "harmony", it is to harm yourself and empower another to harm you.
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Once the process is understood, and with some legal knowledge, it is often better to use CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE. But to know which is best for a situation depends on the situation. The important thing, if you are being infringed or violated, is to make notice of refusal so that you have recourse. Failure of refusal is acceptance under the perverted Uniform Commercial Code.
@minivanjack I believe that the refusal is an harmful act. I believe it is incompatibility to be in harmony by definition. An act of war... Does the notice of it make any difference?
WE ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO DO THE SUING ITS WE THE PEOPLE FORGET THE PRIVATE CORP SUITS they are not goin to help...that is the nonly way we need to begin our own cases
That works for me. But judges are so corrupt they now throw tantrums and threaten "contempt" against anyone who challenges their corruption. I have recently witness absolutely blatant and shameless commission of judicial corruption and failure to enforce against bank fraud. It seems to be consistent throughout the justice system. There is no longer rule of law in our court system We will soon have to find a way to shut down the courts and come up with a better system to administer justice.
@minivanjack It's just sickening. Are you familiar with Larry Fine out of California? I think he was an ex judge or something like that and tried to expose the corruption. He gets locked up for a year, no charges for over a year, the judge lets him out right after/before??? he retires. Fraud and corruption=The new rule of law.
@F8LXEPSHN His name is Richard Fine, an attorney. He was improsoned for 18 months by Judge Yaffe (L.A. Superior Court) for "contempt of court" in retaliation for exposing judicial corruption. Judge Yaffe has retired and has not been prosecuted for ordering and maintaining Fine's imprisonment on fabricated cause. The failure of prosecution points to corruption on the part of the California Attorney General (spanning the terms of Jerry Brown and Kamala D. Harris). Jerry Brown is now Gov. of Calif.
@minivanjack That's right. I have the info on that somewhere along with tons more.
It's bad out there in legal land. Speaking of Kamala; Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Sues Law Firms Engaged in National "Mass Joinder" Mortgage Fraud. <--- looks like she wants a piece of that pie.
@F8LXEPSHN Yes, the best Harris can do is sue people who are trying to HELP people in foreclosure. What about prosecuting the CEOs of the banks for illegally foreclosing and selling homes? When a bank commits fraud with robo-signers, lending fraud, securities fraud and illegal home foreclosures you would think a few of those CEOs would be in prison by now. How is it any different from what (convict) Charles Keating did in the 1980's? DOJ could have stopped this foreclosure crisis three years ago
@minivanjack It's just crazy. I filed a complaint with the Office of Thrift Supervision for Aurora Loan Services foreclosing on my house. I asked them if the prom note I signed is what funded the loan and paid for the house and that you didn't loan me anything. They sent me a copy of my note with 2 endorsements on it. SO I sent a copy of that back to themn and said, "See, here's the proof" that person that sent me that isn't working there anymore or they assigned my case to someone else.
@F8LXEPSHN You are doing exactly the right thing and they are defrauding you. What else is new? The saddest part is the courts are corrupt and the DOJ is not protecting people's houses or prosecuting the bank CEOs for the fraud (robo-signers, forgeries, lending fraud, securities fraud etc. etc.) The judges are all vested in bank equities, and none of the seem to understand the term "conflict of interest".
@minivanjack I told them to show me the accounting, if not then you agree to pay me $3mill in damages. They told me to stop send letters and that they won't be answering anymore correspondence. I'm thinking FINCES next just for fun.
@F8LXEPSHN If everyone were as active and committed as you we would not have the problems. If nothing else you are exposing who the real criminals are. Once you send them a notice to prove they loaned you money their pretense of integrity is over. You seem to be one of the few who know that banks don't loan money, you create the money when you sign the note. It's your money. They take it by fraud and trick you into paying it back. What is FINCES?
@minivanjack I meant Fincen. Fincen.gov I now have evidence to the fact that the note paid for the house cause they sent me a copy with 2 endorsements on the front. That right there is proof that they defrauded
me by deception. Told me I was getting a loan when I wasn't. Game over. The only obstacle is the courts. Even Walker F Todd stated that it was an even exchange of energy in an affidavit and who would know better. The court wasn't having it.
@F8LXEPSHN By far, the corrupt courts are the problem. It's one thing to commit fraud. It's a REAL problem when they ENFORCE fraud. We have to get some judges into prison. If FINCEN was real at all they would have prosecuted 500 bank CEOs by now. There is no govt, no rule of law. It's just a matter of when everybody realizes it.
@minivanjack Unfortunately I don't see that happening in my lifetime. No one I know even wants to hear it and just buries their head in the sand or gets pissed and calls me crazy. Usually they get pissed. I've been into this stuff since junior high. I'm 46 now. It's a lonely life. I can't even get someone to look up the definition of a note. If you like to be ridiculed, tell someone there's no such thing as money. For sick amusement only. Waking people up IS NOT easy.
@F8LXEPSHN If gold is money then there is money, but I take it your comment is designed for people who think FRNs are money. If the internet is good for nothing else, at least it has shown that there is another conscious person out there. Don't give up. Truth is it's own reward.
@minivanjack June 5, 1933 HJR 192 took away the gold and the people were stupid enough to give it to them. Technically and legally IMOwe should be able to create our own prom notes. See UCC1-304. Similar to A4V but better.Take it to a private banker.Credit is all there is and it's unlimited.Actually genius if it weren't for the fraud. I'm seriously contemplating doing this. The ultimate test. Deny my claim of right I call the secret service to compel or get locked up for utilizing the truth.
@F8LXEPSHN I'm not sure what you mean, but the idea of the private banker, private competing currencies, private exchanges is long overdue. FRN system is pure slavery and fraud.
Why not just send affidavits to all the big corps. If they don't rebut in 30 days they agree to pay you $5000 a month for 99 years. When the fail to answer, send an invoice to risk management for payment. Should they refuse then you'll have to sue to get paid.
@F8LXEPSHN That works for me. But judges are so corrupt they now throw tantrums and threaten "contempt" against anyone who challenges their corruption. I have recently witnessed absolutely blatant and shameless commission of judicial corruption and failure to enforce against bank fraud. Judges usually have investments in the same banks. Failure to prosecute bank fraud seems to be consistent throughout the justice system. There is no longer rule of law in our court system.
Keep in mind, your food was bought with paper, the value of which exists only by agreement. Somewhat similarly, our math system would not be where it is if we did not agree upon giving value to some arbitrary representation of, well, three items.
I am not sure if an affidavit has any force, as all it is, is simply paper, just something to memoralize an event. I actually have first-hand knowledge of creating my own affidavit, and having the so called government and courts ignoring the affidavit that I created, it had no effect at all to those that think they have authority or jurisdiction over, as I said it was simply ignored by those.
@LetFreeman That is indication of a corrupt court and corrupt officials. There can be defects or lack of credibility in affidavits, otherwise they must be accepted as fact and law unless rebutted by sworn testimony. A corrupt court will pretend they can ignore a defendant's evidence and testimony. That is when you have to know some law, know how to object and know how to put the court (the judge) in liability for its failures and violations. Many courts don't protect, they violate.
@minivanjack Keep in mind that I am not an attorney and I do not give legal advice. I am on Youtube for entertainment and mutual exchange of information. The more you personally know about the law the more successful you will be. We are up against some very greedy and evil people. There are many other people getting fed up these days with government violations and you can find groups, resources and information with searches for topics that concern you. The law library can be very helpful to you.
can I make an affidavit, telling the Govt, and my university, that as I am being unfairly denied my residency in Colorado, and have thus been overcharged in regards to my student loans (which BTW are from Govt.-thank my parents for that), I demand that the loan debt be canceled, and that I may only be charged resident tuition?
seriously, I could use that- I would be rid of my debts.
@Albukhshi Remember, in order for an affidavit to be powerful it must not be rebuttable with truth and fact, or it must not be rebutted by the receiving party. Also, there are a lot of judges who like to ignore the law and make up their own rules. Technically a court may not rule against an unrebutted affidavit, but judges often do not seem to care what the law says they must do. I am not a lawyer or legal adviser. These are just opinions based on my experiences.
@Albukhshi Include all the elements: A clear title of contents with the word "Affidavit", a statement of fact, a demand or claim for remedy, a clear statement of terms and conditions if the affidavit is not rebutted within 30 days and the signed, sworn notarized statement "under penalty of perjury".
@Albukhshi Also remember, if your affidavit is dishonored you may have to pursue remedy through legal action. If your affidavit is well done your legal pursuit will be much easier. Usually courts (judges) expect you to give your opponent three chances (three affidavits), each with demand and titled "second notice", "third notice" and then to send them a final (fourth) affidavit "Notice of Default". Always send by certified mail and save the signed cards. And NEVER send the original, just copies.
@Fekenator Affidavits are used in court every day. The only variables are what is in the affidavit and how honest or corrupt the court is. A corrupt court can destroy anything, but an honest court cannot over-ride or rule against an affidavit unless there is a rebutting affidavit from the defendant of plaintiff. Affidavits are sworn testimony. The court may not testify. (disclaimer: I am not a lawyer or legal professional.)
Oh and on the representative video you made, what about Ron Paul? What do you think about him? I consider him one of the very very few non-corrupt representatives (ironically enough he is a Texas Republican xD)
@Fekenator: I like Ron Paul because he represents some of my views. The video is mostly about "representatives" that fail to represent the people who voted for them. 90% of Americans opposed the bailouts and "stimulus" programs, 80% are against the war in Afghanistan. Anyone in Congress who voted for those is a traitor and a criminal in fraud against the American people.
@lwanatt I agree, ICN is a great source of important stories not covered by mainstream media. As a video Producer, I wish they would consult me on their production qualities (lighting, audio, production design), but they do a great job of packing a lot of good info in a short show.
I love all your videos on legal subjects like this. Keep up the great work. I'd be interested to know what you think of the whole "free sovernign" movement I've heard of where people use affidavits and stop accepting cash, paying taxes, and unlicense their vehicles. Some people say its just a bunch of false legalese and some say its the real thing. I have no idea what to believe.
The sovereign movement, while it may seem radical, is simply a re-assertion of original intent of our founding fathers, and if that movement does not succeed the only alternative for Americans is slavery under world government for many many decades. Government never bestows freedom. Freedom only exists where it is demanded and taken.
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
I am not entirely clear on what you are doing, but any process that would be accepted by a court as a sworn statement should be effective as an affidavit. It would stand as law unless rebutted by another affidavit if those were the conditions of the original affidavit.
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
@PoorMansPlato A fax of a notarized statement should generally be accepted since you can provide the original. Anything digital is subject to hacking and forging. I would avoid that if possible.
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
@PoorMansPlato I am not familiar with e-signing. Faxing should be OK but it's not as "legal" as Certified U.S. Mail. With affidavits you generally don't send the original, so the fax may be OK in some cases as long as you maintain a record of confirmation of delivery which some fax machines can make.
Very well done Mr. Day! Being a Notary, this is not news to me, per say, however for the millions of people who take things at face value, it is a wonderful lesson. Thank you for your clear and concise presentation.
Wow--this is well presented and clear. I wish I'd known this many years ago. But we did get rid of all the creditors. It's those other documents like registration and drivers licenses that keep us stuck with a physical address.
Absolutely brilliant. I have been putting it (together) for a while. I understand quite a bit about law, but certainly no enough. This really helped to click in a significant way.
I believe that refusal is harmful act. Incompatibility to be in harmony. I believe refusal might be considered as an act of war!
What do you mean by being infringed or violated? How would a present(presentment, statement) be a trespass? I believe some person is willing to serve another and the another is bluntly refusing to accept the gift.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The "act of war" theory is not supported by law or practice. If your neighbor offers to build a buddhist temple in your front yard, a simple notice of refusal is the accepted and customary way of dealing with that. There is no war. There was an offer and a refusal. There is peace. The offer had no authority so refusal is honorable and rightful.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack
If there was a refusal, how can there be a peace?
Refusal is essentially denial, which is essentially failure to consent and consent is agree...
Disagree : to fail to agree : lack harmony : be unlike or at variance : to refuse to agree : to be unsuitable : be harmful because of incompatibility
That's our belief.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM "If there was a refusal how can there be peace?" Peace may have been already been lost by the unfair or coercive nature of the offer. If "peace" can only be restored by capitulation, then tyranny may be performed by making simple courteous offers. You have no peace when you have slaughtering tyrants who make offers which empower themselves. Human dignity, rights and destiny must be defended, sometimes, to PREVENT a loss of "peace".
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack Agreed.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@minivanjack I enjoyed the conversation with you very much. I believe we have agreed on some points in some way and that's what matters. Now, let me terminate it, would that be OK? : )
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM That is your choice. Thank you for your comments.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Our legal system and our culture do not see acceptance of gifts as obligatory. You may be referencing another national culture. In that mindset someone could offer you a "gift" of a bullet in the head and you would have no recourse to refuse. You would be required to stand still as the gun was fired.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack well would you not agree that you have a moral obligation to the person to accept his service to you? He's offering you value, money, no?
I believe the example of a bullet in the head is a bit extreme, but let's say that you would not disagree with him on that matter, but "conditional acceptance" you would present him consequences of his action = death by your friend.
Would he chose to accept or would he rather offer a termination of the agreement? That's the question, isn't it?
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM You have a self-defeating circular logic. Your threat of "death by my friend" is flawed for several reasons.
-Your assailant may accept your terms.
-You have no right to enlist your friend for a violent and controversial act.
-Your threat of violent consequences is no less "act of war" than refusal.
-Your friend may refuse or fail.
-You have lied by saying you are conditionally permissive of fatal violence against you.
You may wish to re-evaluate your core theories.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack 1. Yes, so?2. How can you deny my right, trespassing?My friend would do a lawful act, wouldn't he? By lawful, warranted is meant 3Threat...doh...It could be defined as presentment(suggestion, notice) for consideration. By the law of war I would be in right by him threatening me with the gun in the first place would I not?4 Yes, he might, why does that matter?5 Can you state your assertion in another words as I may not know what you mean? It might be bad example in the first place...
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM
1) You are killed. Is that your chosen destiny?
2) You cannot control how your friend will react to your attempted recruitment. Your friend has personal free will.
3) He didn't threaten. He offered. There is no violation of law.
4) It matters because your involuntary violent death matters.
5) Hoping to create "harmony" you accept an offer of violence against you. That is unharmonious for you. Your acceptance of the offer does not create harmony.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack 1)I belive that he would not be an idiot and rather choose to terminate his agreement, or maybe Believe is not the right word, I would hope so to be honest, lol.
2)Thats why we have trusts, oaths and things like that, he would be making treason if he fails to honor that. I would be dead but if i woulnd't be stupid I would make sure he would face the consequences of that.
3)Exactly, you might define that this way also. That why the "Do you understand me" is so important in my belief.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM
1) Why hope? You are the master of what affects you, but you must act.
2) It makes no sense to die over a stupid "offer". Simply refuse and move on.
3) ??? - not clear. Don't put your life in the hands of others. Some will take advantage.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack This scenario is just stupid. Would I die? Fuck it, the other person would die also, if he choose to do it. But any way in a normal case:
If somebody would threaten me with a gun I would have right to defend myself against him any way I please without being liable for my actions.
In case of an offer, I believe there is no rational person which would offer me to give me a bullet, do you?
What I was suggesting by saying that refusal is an offence was rather a "normal" transaction.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The example was extreme, but perfectly applicable to other circumstances. If I make an offer of seafood, and you are allergic to seafood, you may refuse in honor. In fact, you don't need an allergy, or any other excuse. You just need to respectfully state your position. That is honorable refusal. Never allow yourself to be trapped by a manipulative offer.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The do you understand thing, where some persons claim it to be "do you stand under me" is in my belief rather a thing of comprehending what he might be saying to you. He says one thing, you think another, he asks you whether you get it and you say yes. But he never defined the words he used and he might have meant something else then you think the words mean. And I think that this is what him the right to let's say arrest you or similar thing. He gets the warrant. Same refusal
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Your sentence structure is not clear. All the warrant does is give the enforcer some encouragement by, sometimes, a corrupt court, to use force on you. You are then under threat of force and you will be harmed if you do not submit to force. This is no longer an offer. It is a threat of assault by overwhelming force.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack Youtube is really bad for commenting and discussions I'm finding.
But as I said, this example is very bad in it's nature and also quite improbable to happen...
I know there are some bad persons but I am rather choosing to assume that the world is good, honorable, gracious and graceful so I can react to that accordingly.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM The evidence of evil and cruelty are easily found. Only by denial are they not seen. When you presume all others to be good you empower and enable those who are not.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack Yes, but if you are coming to a transaction with this dangerous belief of there is evil and cruelty you might wrong those who are not and that of itself is not noble, gracious and good, which is what we kinda all are looking for in my belief, isn't it?
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@minivanjack The persons do the harm to each other by being disgraceful, dishonorable... and I believe that's why we have the structure of the system we have today... I don't believe that people are harming themselves, really, brotherhoods and stuff... I think that these are for the protection from the persons...
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM When you grant full authority to the person making the offer you strip others of their right to determine their destinies.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack The "problem" is would he honor his agreements or would he do treason?
The reason why did I offer the act of war (offence by refusal) is because I believe/am thinking that that is where police get the warrant to use force against your person... is that not what happens when you refuse their request of you?
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Police are enforcers. They are administrators of tyranny. They do not make offers, they command and control.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM "Service" is defined by the "Server" and it may, in the eyes of the recipient be violence, tyranny or harm. You are suggesting that by offering anything and calling it a gift you have right of command over other sovereigns. The "obligation to accept an offer" is a manipulative construct which assaults and diminishes the right of self-determination. You may not become someone's master by offering something to them. You must have consent.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack Let's agree that it may be considered as a violence.It is a obligation of his to notify the server of his understanding if he wants later to have a remedy, right?Why are you stirring a right to command in this scenario of obligation to pay money.You have at all times right of self-determination, but you are also presented with an offer that you would have to deal with and all I'm suggesting is that you might want to accept it so the value, money, may be created.
No killing pls
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM You are arguing in unsupportable theories. Accepting an offer does not create money.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM If an offer is not a trespass then neither is a refusal. There are evil people, evil intentions and evil proposals. It is not creating "harmony" to acquiesce. Those offers may, in honor, be refused. To accept a destructive offer is not to create "harmony", it is to harm yourself and empower another to harm you.
minivanjack 3 months ago
I believe the refusal is not the right way to go. I believe the same stands for the denial.
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
@RICHARDIVANdotCOM Once the process is understood, and with some legal knowledge, it is often better to use CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE. But to know which is best for a situation depends on the situation. The important thing, if you are being infringed or violated, is to make notice of refusal so that you have recourse. Failure of refusal is acceptance under the perverted Uniform Commercial Code.
minivanjack 3 months ago
@minivanjack I believe that the refusal is an harmful act. I believe it is incompatibility to be in harmony by definition. An act of war... Does the notice of it make any difference?
RICHARDIVANdotCOM 3 months ago
WE ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO DO THE SUING ITS WE THE PEOPLE FORGET THE PRIVATE CORP SUITS they are not goin to help...that is the nonly way we need to begin our own cases
4skully 4 months ago
I have a great respect for you sir thank you very much for this video
4skully 4 months ago
Comment removed
anatureperson 5 months ago
@anatureperson What "works" is what we make work.
minivanjack 4 months ago
That works for me. But judges are so corrupt they now throw tantrums and threaten "contempt" against anyone who challenges their corruption. I have recently witness absolutely blatant and shameless commission of judicial corruption and failure to enforce against bank fraud. It seems to be consistent throughout the justice system. There is no longer rule of law in our court system We will soon have to find a way to shut down the courts and come up with a better system to administer justice.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack It's just sickening. Are you familiar with Larry Fine out of California? I think he was an ex judge or something like that and tried to expose the corruption. He gets locked up for a year, no charges for over a year, the judge lets him out right after/before??? he retires. Fraud and corruption=The new rule of law.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN His name is Richard Fine, an attorney. He was improsoned for 18 months by Judge Yaffe (L.A. Superior Court) for "contempt of court" in retaliation for exposing judicial corruption. Judge Yaffe has retired and has not been prosecuted for ordering and maintaining Fine's imprisonment on fabricated cause. The failure of prosecution points to corruption on the part of the California Attorney General (spanning the terms of Jerry Brown and Kamala D. Harris). Jerry Brown is now Gov. of Calif.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack That's right. I have the info on that somewhere along with tons more.
It's bad out there in legal land. Speaking of Kamala; Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Sues Law Firms Engaged in National "Mass Joinder" Mortgage Fraud. <--- looks like she wants a piece of that pie.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN Yes, the best Harris can do is sue people who are trying to HELP people in foreclosure. What about prosecuting the CEOs of the banks for illegally foreclosing and selling homes? When a bank commits fraud with robo-signers, lending fraud, securities fraud and illegal home foreclosures you would think a few of those CEOs would be in prison by now. How is it any different from what (convict) Charles Keating did in the 1980's? DOJ could have stopped this foreclosure crisis three years ago
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack It's just crazy. I filed a complaint with the Office of Thrift Supervision for Aurora Loan Services foreclosing on my house. I asked them if the prom note I signed is what funded the loan and paid for the house and that you didn't loan me anything. They sent me a copy of my note with 2 endorsements on it. SO I sent a copy of that back to themn and said, "See, here's the proof" that person that sent me that isn't working there anymore or they assigned my case to someone else.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN You are doing exactly the right thing and they are defrauding you. What else is new? The saddest part is the courts are corrupt and the DOJ is not protecting people's houses or prosecuting the bank CEOs for the fraud (robo-signers, forgeries, lending fraud, securities fraud etc. etc.) The judges are all vested in bank equities, and none of the seem to understand the term "conflict of interest".
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack I told them to show me the accounting, if not then you agree to pay me $3mill in damages. They told me to stop send letters and that they won't be answering anymore correspondence. I'm thinking FINCES next just for fun.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN If everyone were as active and committed as you we would not have the problems. If nothing else you are exposing who the real criminals are. Once you send them a notice to prove they loaned you money their pretense of integrity is over. You seem to be one of the few who know that banks don't loan money, you create the money when you sign the note. It's your money. They take it by fraud and trick you into paying it back. What is FINCES?
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack I meant Fincen. Fincen.gov I now have evidence to the fact that the note paid for the house cause they sent me a copy with 2 endorsements on the front. That right there is proof that they defrauded
me by deception. Told me I was getting a loan when I wasn't. Game over. The only obstacle is the courts. Even Walker F Todd stated that it was an even exchange of energy in an affidavit and who would know better. The court wasn't having it.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN By far, the corrupt courts are the problem. It's one thing to commit fraud. It's a REAL problem when they ENFORCE fraud. We have to get some judges into prison. If FINCEN was real at all they would have prosecuted 500 bank CEOs by now. There is no govt, no rule of law. It's just a matter of when everybody realizes it.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack Unfortunately I don't see that happening in my lifetime. No one I know even wants to hear it and just buries their head in the sand or gets pissed and calls me crazy. Usually they get pissed. I've been into this stuff since junior high. I'm 46 now. It's a lonely life. I can't even get someone to look up the definition of a note. If you like to be ridiculed, tell someone there's no such thing as money. For sick amusement only. Waking people up IS NOT easy.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN If gold is money then there is money, but I take it your comment is designed for people who think FRNs are money. If the internet is good for nothing else, at least it has shown that there is another conscious person out there. Don't give up. Truth is it's own reward.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack June 5, 1933 HJR 192 took away the gold and the people were stupid enough to give it to them. Technically and legally IMOwe should be able to create our own prom notes. See UCC1-304. Similar to A4V but better.Take it to a private banker.Credit is all there is and it's unlimited.Actually genius if it weren't for the fraud. I'm seriously contemplating doing this. The ultimate test. Deny my claim of right I call the secret service to compel or get locked up for utilizing the truth.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN I'm not sure what you mean, but the idea of the private banker, private competing currencies, private exchanges is long overdue. FRN system is pure slavery and fraud.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack Yes it is. There's a large topic at Redemption by Method on the subject.
Have you ever read Mary Elizabeth Crofts e-book???
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN I will check that out.
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack I agree 100% I want people to wake up so bad
4skully 4 months ago
Why not just send affidavits to all the big corps. If they don't rebut in 30 days they agree to pay you $5000 a month for 99 years. When the fail to answer, send an invoice to risk management for payment. Should they refuse then you'll have to sue to get paid.
Just a thought...
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN If you can get the courts to enforce for you like they do for the DMV and the county tax collector that is rock solid! (Fat chance.)
minivanjack 6 months ago
@minivanjack Well, if they breach their fiduciary responsibility as administrators then I feel
a letter to the DOJ (for what it's worth) to show cause why the judge shouldn't be arrested and removed from the bench for his breach of trust.
F8LXEPSHN 6 months ago
@F8LXEPSHN That works for me. But judges are so corrupt they now throw tantrums and threaten "contempt" against anyone who challenges their corruption. I have recently witnessed absolutely blatant and shameless commission of judicial corruption and failure to enforce against bank fraud. Judges usually have investments in the same banks. Failure to prosecute bank fraud seems to be consistent throughout the justice system. There is no longer rule of law in our court system.
minivanjack 6 months ago
Can I design an affidavit intended for the utility corporation in order to block installation of a smart meter on my house?
aphoolimnaught 6 months ago
@aphoolimnaught Yes. You'll see copy/pastable wording for that below the "Smart Meters" video (search "minivanjack smart meters".).
minivanjack 6 months ago
Excellent Video. Thanks
lisulove 7 months ago
Keep in mind, your food was bought with paper, the value of which exists only by agreement. Somewhat similarly, our math system would not be where it is if we did not agree upon giving value to some arbitrary representation of, well, three items.
kellyvcraig 7 months ago
I am not sure if an affidavit has any force, as all it is, is simply paper, just something to memoralize an event. I actually have first-hand knowledge of creating my own affidavit, and having the so called government and courts ignoring the affidavit that I created, it had no effect at all to those that think they have authority or jurisdiction over, as I said it was simply ignored by those.
LetFreeman 8 months ago
@LetFreeman That is indication of a corrupt court and corrupt officials. There can be defects or lack of credibility in affidavits, otherwise they must be accepted as fact and law unless rebutted by sworn testimony. A corrupt court will pretend they can ignore a defendant's evidence and testimony. That is when you have to know some law, know how to object and know how to put the court (the judge) in liability for its failures and violations. Many courts don't protect, they violate.
minivanjack 8 months ago
@minivanjack Keep in mind that I am not an attorney and I do not give legal advice. I am on Youtube for entertainment and mutual exchange of information. The more you personally know about the law the more successful you will be. We are up against some very greedy and evil people. There are many other people getting fed up these days with government violations and you can find groups, resources and information with searches for topics that concern you. The law library can be very helpful to you.
minivanjack 8 months ago
@LetFreeman did you get your affidavits notarized
rondie54 7 months ago
can I make an affidavit, telling the Govt, and my university, that as I am being unfairly denied my residency in Colorado, and have thus been overcharged in regards to my student loans (which BTW are from Govt.-thank my parents for that), I demand that the loan debt be canceled, and that I may only be charged resident tuition?
seriously, I could use that- I would be rid of my debts.
Albukhshi 1 year ago
@Albukhshi Remember, in order for an affidavit to be powerful it must not be rebuttable with truth and fact, or it must not be rebutted by the receiving party. Also, there are a lot of judges who like to ignore the law and make up their own rules. Technically a court may not rule against an unrebutted affidavit, but judges often do not seem to care what the law says they must do. I am not a lawyer or legal adviser. These are just opinions based on my experiences.
minivanjack 1 year ago
@minivanjack
ok then, time to get cracking.
thanks for the advice. I know you aren't a lawyer, but your suggestion in the video may turn out to be my saving-if I luck out.
Albukhshi 1 year ago
@Albukhshi I offer no advice or suggestions, just opinions.
False statements under oath are very dangerous. Be careful.
minivanjack 1 year ago
@minivanjack
I will be. I know what will happen if I lie-so I won't do that.
Albukhshi 1 year ago
@Albukhshi Include all the elements: A clear title of contents with the word "Affidavit", a statement of fact, a demand or claim for remedy, a clear statement of terms and conditions if the affidavit is not rebutted within 30 days and the signed, sworn notarized statement "under penalty of perjury".
minivanjack 1 year ago
@Albukhshi Also remember, if your affidavit is dishonored you may have to pursue remedy through legal action. If your affidavit is well done your legal pursuit will be much easier. Usually courts (judges) expect you to give your opponent three chances (three affidavits), each with demand and titled "second notice", "third notice" and then to send them a final (fourth) affidavit "Notice of Default". Always send by certified mail and save the signed cards. And NEVER send the original, just copies.
minivanjack 1 year ago
Good info, thanks for sharing. =)
kjalcaraz84 1 year ago
This is brilliant...sent to me by a friend....Many thanks!!!
marypoppins2009 1 year ago
This video should have 500,000 views or more!! Jerry knows his stuff and has EXCELLENT videos!!! Among the most knowledgeable people on youtube.
End The Fed!!!
thomastholin 1 year ago
Jerry, I'd like to know if you have ever done this? I want to but I don't think it would hold up in court very well...
Fekenator 1 year ago
@Fekenator Affidavits are used in court every day. The only variables are what is in the affidavit and how honest or corrupt the court is. A corrupt court can destroy anything, but an honest court cannot over-ride or rule against an affidavit unless there is a rebutting affidavit from the defendant of plaintiff. Affidavits are sworn testimony. The court may not testify. (disclaimer: I am not a lawyer or legal professional.)
minivanjack 1 year ago
@minivanjack hehe, there's the disclaimer lol
Well thanks, I love your channel!
Oh and on the representative video you made, what about Ron Paul? What do you think about him? I consider him one of the very very few non-corrupt representatives (ironically enough he is a Texas Republican xD)
Fekenator 1 year ago
@Fekenator: I like Ron Paul because he represents some of my views. The video is mostly about "representatives" that fail to represent the people who voted for them. 90% of Americans opposed the bailouts and "stimulus" programs, 80% are against the war in Afghanistan. Anyone in Congress who voted for those is a traitor and a criminal in fraud against the American people.
minivanjack 1 year ago
if you are interested in the truth check out icn, but dont stop there spread the word, /watch?v=thF23TiHbuA
lwanatt 1 year ago
@lwanatt: ICN is very good. "Informed Citizen News" let me repeat your recommendation:
youtube(dot)com/user/InformedCitizenNews#p/u/64/PX6TmE_n90c
minivanjack 1 year ago
if you are interested in the truth check out icn, but dont stop there spread the word, /watch?v=thF23TiHbuA
lwanatt 1 year ago
if you are interested in the truth check out icn, but dont stop there spread the word, /watch?v=thF23TiHbuA
lwanatt 1 year ago
@lwanatt I agree, ICN is a great source of important stories not covered by mainstream media. As a video Producer, I wish they would consult me on their production qualities (lighting, audio, production design), but they do a great job of packing a lot of good info in a short show.
minivanjack 6 months ago
if you are interested in the truth check out icn, but dont stop there spread the word, /watch?v=thF23TiHbuA
lwanatt 1 year ago
I love all your videos on legal subjects like this. Keep up the great work. I'd be interested to know what you think of the whole "free sovernign" movement I've heard of where people use affidavits and stop accepting cash, paying taxes, and unlicense their vehicles. Some people say its just a bunch of false legalese and some say its the real thing. I have no idea what to believe.
grinc333 1 year ago
@grinc333
The sovereign movement, while it may seem radical, is simply a re-assertion of original intent of our founding fathers, and if that movement does not succeed the only alternative for Americans is slavery under world government for many many decades. Government never bestows freedom. Freedom only exists where it is demanded and taken.
minivanjack 1 year ago
How can you prove in court that you sent an affidavit?
shaurz 1 year ago
@shaurz
Good question. You only deliver or serve a copy. You always keep the original.
minivanjack 1 year ago
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
800dothelp 1 year ago
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
800dothelp 1 year ago
As always, Mr. Day, you show us brilliant, clear, critical thought, and remind us of what is possible therewith... May God bless you for your centurion-like efforts. I wihs there were about a few hundred million more like you here in our beloved land of the free & home of the brave.
800dothelp 1 year ago
I think Jerry should run for President
Brainwave68 1 year ago
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Patrick
pjw2pjw 1 year ago
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Patrick
pjw2pjw 1 year ago
Jerry, very informative indeed. What many other Americans need to know as well is how the "Federal" government has created a "straw man" to enslave us as "taxpayers" using legal "words of art". As the saying goes, if you don't KNOW your rights - you DON'T have any.
Patrick
pjw2pjw 1 year ago
i have this so i dont worry about that
donniebrasco24 1 year ago
I am a big fan of your "legal" type videos - keep up the excellent work. I love this stuff.
grinc333 1 year ago
thank you. i never knew any of that before.
SuccubusRaptured 1 year ago
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
PoorMansPlato 1 year ago
@PoorMansPlato
I am not entirely clear on what you are doing, but any process that would be accepted by a court as a sworn statement should be effective as an affidavit. It would stand as law unless rebutted by another affidavit if those were the conditions of the original affidavit.
minivanjack 1 year ago
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
PoorMansPlato 1 year ago
@PoorMansPlato A fax of a notarized statement should generally be accepted since you can provide the original. Anything digital is subject to hacking and forging. I would avoid that if possible.
minivanjack 1 year ago
Jerry, can we also use electronic "signature" in the same manner?
I "E-signed my FAFSA" If I am able to create a process which allows them to "E-sign" an emailed document? How about the Fax process where "notarized" documents are involved?
PoorMansPlato 1 year ago
@PoorMansPlato I am not familiar with e-signing. Faxing should be OK but it's not as "legal" as Certified U.S. Mail. With affidavits you generally don't send the original, so the fax may be OK in some cases as long as you maintain a record of confirmation of delivery which some fax machines can make.
minivanjack 6 months ago
Good Work, Thanks
atticus9799 1 year ago
Very well done Mr. Day! Being a Notary, this is not news to me, per say, however for the millions of people who take things at face value, it is a wonderful lesson. Thank you for your clear and concise presentation.
atticus9799 1 year ago
Wow--this is well presented and clear. I wish I'd known this many years ago. But we did get rid of all the creditors. It's those other documents like registration and drivers licenses that keep us stuck with a physical address.
toounfazed 1 year ago
nice info!
keep up the great work!
:)
PestControl02 1 year ago
Great stuff....new YT format is horrible
UnderseaCaveman 1 year ago
Please do more videos on this subject! =)
micromause 1 year ago
great video
scrlvr25C 1 year ago
great! thank you for waking us up.
imigrantpunk 1 year ago
keep up the great work.
TheReptoid 1 year ago
Love your work.. thank you for speaking truth
Eraser7622 1 year ago
I am danish. As I see it, we have no opportunites like this, at least I can't figure it out, far from.
We neither seem to have the possibility to get "free man on the land" or "Alberta" status.
I am slowly coming to the conclussion that the people of this country, are held firmer in place by law, than in most other countries.
I wish I am wrong though !!!
durizap 1 year ago
good
IBMeddling 1 year ago
Absolutely brilliant. I have been putting it (together) for a while. I understand quite a bit about law, but certainly no enough. This really helped to click in a significant way.
theoriginalanomaly 1 year ago
Great info, I'll remember this...thanks.
TBA4Freedom 1 year ago
Absolutely fantastic!!!!!!
Iwillbedurnd!
Iwillbedurnd 1 year ago
Excellent video / information! 5*
Thank You!
TheMysticGuard 1 year ago