Seriously, I dont understand why the "baptize in Jesus' name" crowd throw a fit over people who baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Its not like you're going to hell because the "baptizer" said "Father, Son, and Holy Ghost." Also, baptismal regeneration is unscriptural. Had to throw that last part in there.
Hahahahahahaahahahaha this is funny he say don't look John so let don't read any John verses if John is wrong the what about the rest bible is not the words of god bible is slave owners masters book
Here is funny thing. Mat 28:19 says baptize in the name of F S and HS. This mentioned once. Not one time in the NT do we find it being done just as this command says. Funny how all denominations baptize in this fashion with no pprecedent and only one mention, yet they all reject baptism for remission even though it is clearly commanded act 2:38 and practiced Act 22.16. Paul did baptize in act 16:31, just read the next verse and u can see he is like me or I like him
Shouldn't the apostle paul have included baptism when the jailer asked "what must I do to be saved" paul responded with "Believe on the lord jesus and thou shalt be saved" (Acts 16:30-31) I'm sure if Mr. Robertson were asked this question he would have been dogmatic in his belief in sinners baptism. Apparently the apostle paul would not make a very good member of Mr. Robertson church.
I take Romans 10:9 & 10 literally. 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. I take confession is made unto salvation...literally!
Seriously, I dont understand why the "baptize in Jesus' name" crowd throw a fit over people who baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Its not like you're going to hell because the "baptizer" said "Father, Son, and Holy Ghost." Also, baptismal regeneration is unscriptural. Had to throw that last part in there.
astherrien 1 month ago
Hahahahahahaahahahaha this is funny he say don't look John so let don't read any John verses if John is wrong the what about the rest bible is not the words of god bible is slave owners masters book
AHMEDBULAXUBEY 2 months ago
Here is funny thing. Mat 28:19 says baptize in the name of F S and HS. This mentioned once. Not one time in the NT do we find it being done just as this command says. Funny how all denominations baptize in this fashion with no pprecedent and only one mention, yet they all reject baptism for remission even though it is clearly commanded act 2:38 and practiced Act 22.16. Paul did baptize in act 16:31, just read the next verse and u can see he is like me or I like him
BibleSaysTV 4 months ago
Shouldn't the apostle paul have included baptism when the jailer asked "what must I do to be saved" paul responded with "Believe on the lord jesus and thou shalt be saved" (Acts 16:30-31) I'm sure if Mr. Robertson were asked this question he would have been dogmatic in his belief in sinners baptism. Apparently the apostle paul would not make a very good member of Mr. Robertson church.
newj34 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I take Romans 10:9 & 10 literally. 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. I take confession is made unto salvation...literally!
newj34 4 months ago
This is very good but I think the phone caller should debate this guy he nailed on the head..... Prove it... LOVE IT
MrJohnnymiller54 1 year ago
This is great! Johnny can just have the callers refute the Baptist.
"If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee, then how canst thou contend with horses? ..." (Jeremiah 12:5)
If the Baptist cannot deal with an average TV watcher, how can he hope to contend with the likes of Johnny?
sklaft 1 year ago