TOPOL'
5:43
Added: 4 years ago
From: lisabahach
Views: 99,078
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (205)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is the missile that will defend and liberate Europe from USA.

  • что за музыка в начале играет?

  • @terminator4020 дибил максимум 6 мин время запуска тополя м. Россия всех нах порвет

  • С нами сила!

  • По Врагам таким как пизданём,,, а врагов у России куча, все их знают....

  • obsolete......................­

  • у нас в сибири катаются такие и в поездах! от шахт отказались

  • А че, потом отмывать от всей этой гари трубу надо, да?

  • она в Америку полетела,да?))

  • Russia No.1 :-D

  • I was expecting to see some bis ass fireworks..

  • Россия имеет ядерное оружие в настоящее время лучшим в состоянии реагировать на все атаки в мире! Советские солдаты жить!

  • this missile is unstopable

  • vay amk güzel missille

  • ПОСЛЕ ПУСКА (В РЕАЛЬНЫХ УСЛОВИЯХ) вся бригада должна как можно быстрее из точки запуска свалить. чем дальше=тем лучше. А ЭТИ ПЕНДОСЫ ЕЛЕ ШЕВЕЛЯТСЯ..... если б по-настоящему,то через 2-3 мин. прилетела б вражеская ракетка. и скорее всего не одна..... и тогда пришлось бы всех там генералов и солдатиков по кусочкам собирать...

  • @terminator4020

    -Насчёт 2-3 минут вы загнули. 30 минут, минимум 20.

  • slava rossii---eto nastoyaschaya armia

  • someone knows name of the song on the beginning?

  • воин со шваброй и керосином красавчик)))))))

  • rusia tiene mas modelos de misiles que ningun otro pais viva la madre RUSIA

  • Попали хоть?

  • Мощь! Красота! Сила! Вперёд Россия!

  • @KyTy3oB62rus ракеты то маид ин Юкрэин Днепропетровск "Южмаш" конструировал Л. Д. Кучма был там сначала конструктором, потом директором а уж потом президентом =) так что вперед словяне! чтоли. тем более тягач белорусский.

  • This is the conflict ender on 18 wheels heeh :)

  • SKAVURSKA!

  • i just hope the day we use that weapons will never come..or we are doomed

    greetings from germany

    grüße aus deutschland

    long live russia!

  • at 0:35 I think it said New york city.

  • @bombarderoazul the left side was for kamchatka and the right was for moscow

  • more like Moscow, mate.

  • старичок, во всём остальном мире нет ничего сравнимого с этим "старьём"...

    не уподобляйся пендосам-игнорантам.

    Пендосы-специалисты понимают и боятся. А нам ничего больше и не надо!

  • Тополь это уровень 80-х - 90-х. Американцы в кач-ве наземных баллистических ракет используют старинный "Минутмен" производства начала 1970-х. Удивлен???

  • Не удивлён, они достаточно надёжны. А тополя каждую неделю неисправности выдают и пиндосы это тоже знают. Мне довелось послужить сначала на шахтных комплексах (УР-100К), а потом на этих кривых тополях, так что знаю, что говорю.

  • неисправно в шасси или в ракетах?

  • В основном в электронике.

  • минитмен уже свернули за малоэффективностью--теперь это-зубочистка для обамки-

    Удивлен?

  • минитмен-3 свернули? что за бред??? их окол 300-х штук у амеров на дежурстве

  • не делают их уже--и пусть хоть 3000000 их на дежурстве--и что??-не долетит ни одна-Или тебе надо рассказывать о росс. про?-

  • асинева полетит-хрен ее удержишь--как Маккейн и сказал--пентагон знает--а ютюбовые идиоты-не знают и вопят 24 часа--

  • Ответ очень прост : если бы у нашей страны не было армии и "этого", то России как государства не существовало бы

  • Надеюсь, что в будущем не будет оснований для применения такого класса оружия...

    Всё таки, что не говори, а все же это оружие массового уничтожения, если бабахнет, то накроет всех, детей, стариков, больных, здоровых, в общем всех, плохих или хороших, итог один...

  • Ну всех не накроет. Можно в бункере отсидеться. Или где-нибудь на дальних островах в океане. Да и разрушительная мощь современных боеголовок сильно преувеличенна в сознании широких масс.

  • Гудбай америка ооооо=)

  • Koembaya America xD

  • хорошо пошла...

  • i think you need to check yourself into a Mental Institution

  • Естественно у всех есть неплохие ракеты .

    Елки палки . Ты знаешь какая ракета используется на Тополе ?

    А может я туда Булаву или сатану запихну саму ракету то не видно.

    Можно например туда гнилых бобов с сибирской язвой запихать как вариант.

  • satana zhitkotoplevnaja, v shahtah, eje na mashinu ne polozhish.

  • не беспокой всё нормально .......

  • Приветствую всех ракетчиков!!!

    1987-1989гг.

  • Ракеты модифицируются откуда ты знаешь что за ракету поместили на ведущую платформу или в шахту. Так тебе и сказали . Просто хватит глупости тут писать.

  • Просто Тополь еще одно дополнение в Армию.

    А по поводу Поезда есть договоренности надо из них выходить.

    И опять строить поезд.

  • Из ваших постов следует зачем делать ракеты навроде Искандера , когда можно кругом настроить шахт с ракетами побольше все равно долетят.

    При развале СССР многое списали но щас никто эти шахты не спишет то что осталось.

  • Конечно ракетчик тут отпишется.

    Амеры тоже пытались создать что то навроде тополя токо не смогли.

    ПРО не существует порабы это уже понять , это как звездный войны такойже бред.

    Поезд да , но это совсем другой вид оружия придет день и он опять будет бороздить наши РЖД.

  • Амеры свернули свои разработки мобильных грунтовых комплексов, посчитав их развертывание нецелесообразным.

    Тополь - это конечно хорошо. Но не нужно считать амеров идиотами. У них есть тоже очень даже неплохие ракеты.

  • Вся эта муть с ПРО была сделана , только для того , чтобы под предлогом защиты ракет от ПРО перевести наши РВСН на позорный Тополь-м , а нормальные ракеты распилить. Я думаю , что так и есть.

  • Поверьте ракетчику, не всё так красиво и гладко...

  • С ракетами тополь-м или в принципе с РВСН?

  • И с Тополями, и с РВСН. К стати, Тополя отслеживаются в реальном масштабе времени в любую погоду, в любое время суток, а чтобы вывести из строя достаточно одного выстрела. Из мобильного только БЖРК по-настоящему скрытен, а их- то и уничтожили уроды.

  • По поводу шахт- их защищённость и организация размещения обеспечивает достаточную защиту. И ещё, при одинаковых размерах жидкостная ракета поднимает в 1,5 раза больший груз или почти в 1,5 дальше летит.

  • @ozols58, вы правы. Хотя я не служу в ВС (только 13 лет всего), но понимаю, что на Войне пафосу нет места.

  • @ozols58

    -Поверить можно видеоролику, здесь всё очевидно и понятно. А почему нужно верить вам?

    -Объясните.

  • @ozols58, ага, уже поверили. Тут полный ютуб таких ракетчиков, авиаконструкторов, министров и спецназовцев расказывающих как в России всё плохо, какой плохой Путин и как надо ненавидеть свою родину... Плевали мы на вас.

  • January 3, 2009

    Dear Russia:

    That is one serious rocket with incredible potential, especially, if it has a nuclear warhead. The only thing I can suggest is use this technology wisely. For defense is understandable. Bye: Joe : )

  • nato.....dont fuck with russia

  • This is an awesome missile with great mobility and capability. I live in Canada so I hope the USA does not provoke an attack because I know Russia may target Canada as well, so I beg you to have mercy on us when you attack...please, we have Hot women for you here, don't vaporize them (USA have fat women)привет from Montreal

  • Lol privet! Hi! watch : watch?v=1xpAM1MfHHk

    this is a new TOPOL just invented hope you understand Russian language.

  • 0:32

    to Kamchatka - 6726 km

    to Moscow - 1248 km

    funny=)

  • таких ракет 2-3 на штат Нью-Йорка упадут и миллионов 10-15 человек подохнут сразу и ещё миллионов 5 подохнут от радиации

  • зачем же так :) их и так до смерти напугали " агрессивным кремлем " :)

  • Kerdi skoro vsei vashei americe ha ha ha

  • Russina has not only nuclear but it has chemical weepon too. There are no one can't even touch russian army.

  • diswombled Интересно а как ты был бы одет в -30 в сибири? в кофточке ?

  • это ядерная ракета!

  • да блять от залпа такой хуйни охуеешь на месте. зачем бегать, когда можно катать по сибири такие системы ? их не обнаружить, а значит и тяжело уничтожить.

  • why they gave u thumb down? what u did u say?

  • you live in Urkaine which is accociated with ex-ussr country. So you will not be bombed by Russians topol, but by Americans Tridents in ww3. So that's why it's better for you. Getting used to to this idea and gonna love the trident? Lol

  • америкосам скоро придёт "гитлер капут" со своеи програмой "звёздных войн" они отстают

  • When we see American video we say "American's army is the best army in the world", when we see Russian videos we say "Russian's army is the best in the world". So _any_ army is the best army in the world!

  • There is no best army ... just strongest ... and that is a RUSSIAN one

  • ofcourse, this video is about Russian army, I've written about it above. If the video was about American army, here would be a lot of writers who wrote "American army is the best". So it depends on the video. Click on couple of other videos to see this dependancy. LoL :)

  • Russia is the best army in the world! GODS ARMY!

  • tell united terrorist states of america that stop terrorizing world otherwise will be destroyed by Russia by God willing

  • YES INDEED TOVARISH! :D

  • Why care about these nukes? If just one of them is launched, that means the world is going into a full out nuclear war. Meaning we all die. If you think Russia would survive the 100's of nukes aimed at it your horribly mistaken.

    Maybe parts of Antarctica will be safe to live after such a war.

    So I ask you? Whats the purpose of marching nukes down the streets of Moscow? The only people impressed were yourselves. The rest of the world just rolled their eyes at your cold war mentality.

  • you americans talk about how bad launching nukes are but you constantly threaten iran with pre emptive nuclear war.......

  • yeah constantly huh? all the time. lol Besides Russia and North Korea... who else marches its nukes down main st? For what purpose? It intimidates no one. It does the opposite. It makes people roll their eyes and question the mentality of your leaders and people.

    And I am not saying that as an insult, but because its true.

  • Wow. A nuclear missile. And you guys find something to be proud of here?

  • What else to be proud of? 6 years in Iraq and losing the war against bunch of untrained militia? looooooooooooooooooooooooooool

    Redneck

  • ooooooooooookay

    You're not playing with a full deck i see. Did budget cuts close your school for you "special" kids?

  • doh he forgot the 10 year afgan/russian war.... yep lack of fundings thats gotta be it. ^_^

  • lol

  • but we don`t help iraq!!!

  • отличное видео, и звуковое сопровождение классное :)

  • Don't be afraid. Problems of racism are affected, it is show of people, who was bought by CIA and another organizations. Come to Moscow, Saint-Petersburg. =) Everything will be all right.

  • Russians is ready for anything. I mean first ones in space.

  • nice vid topol is best system on world

  • I'm proud of my country!!!

  • my favourite

  • КЛАСС!!!

    GEIL!!!

  • dont MESS WITH RUSSIA

  • why, because we might laugh at them and hurt their feelings. lol. lol.

  • laught all you want, but it wount be funny when there is a topol missle lading in ur back yard.

  • Russia is a bigger joke than its was before. wanting recognision by pointing its missiles at other countries, how brave of Russia. you treat bullies by just ignoring them. they have a little shout, a little jumping around, a little threaten and they they come back all quiet and looking stupid.

  • ha, another pathetic little brit, stay out of it, i understand your pov on the missle pointing, because you europeans shit your little pants, when you heard it, calling russians "bullies", and ignoring them is how to get rid of them.

    HA, what are you a fucking 10 year old fag, that gets beat up in school? there is more to the topic, idiot

    btw, if you hate russia so much, why the fuck do you have 10 sukhoi videos favorited? fucking hypocrite, dude grow up, get some balls, and shut the fuck up

  • using bad language is the langauge of fools, so fool, enlighten us some more.

    i may not like Russia, but i can still appreciate some of their toys. whats hypocritical about that, fool. staying informed, it better informed. fool. i know with your narrow mind set, this is alien, but try it, you may learn something.

  • sorry don't got the time to waste on 10 year old boys, who say "fool" 5 times in a paragraph

  • you do like your 10 year old boys and then the fag thing, is there something you want to tell every-one. fool. its obvious you got issues, probably picked on at school. dont take them out on the rest of us, see a doctor. fool. (thats 2 this time in a paragraph).

  • wilss du frieden bereite dich fur ein krieg CESAR.

  • too bad They have the biggest nukes and US cant even afford healthcare.

  • 2 bad you guys can't afford GAS fer that bigass truck......must SuCk 2 b russian!

  • Muhaahaha. Yank talking about american superior "wounderwaffe" laser weapons. Lol. This stuff is really expensive useles peace of junk, waste money of naive american tax payers!

  • Eta Nie Pendium -M a Topol-M

  • Awesome!Long live Topol-M and Russian Federation!

  • Its amazing

  • Not really they have the worlds most advance. Rem they were first in space and they are able to to monitor everything.

  • It was interesting to note as well that the US would gain from another arms race because it would revitalize an entire industry again.

    i heard this is what america wants with China.

  • Arms race with Chine is nonsence.

    China owns american money supply. Not china alone ofcourse, but most of it.

    It's like blowing up the bank that keeps your money.

  • I read an article that Russia's president is trying to "growl" to impress the voters of Russia with the next election. Is there any truth to this?

    I also read that Russia has very poor early-warning systems making much of the weapons "useless". Any truth to that?

    Also that Russia will falter again if oil prices fall.

  • "I also read that Russia has very poor early-warning systems making much of the weapons "useless". Any truth to that?"

    Nope. Dont believe everything you read...especially if you read it from the internet.

  • "I also read that Russia has very poor early-warning systems making much of the weapons "useless". Any truth to that?"

    Yes, this is true. I know this first hand and not from what I've read.

  • Interesting. Last I heard, Russia has a 360 radar coverage observing the border, and a system that can monitor USA airspace using "over the horison" radars stationed in kamchatka and belarus.

  • ...no, actually, it is not. Apart from that, the mobile design of these weapons makes it possible to launch them even after a nuclear attack on Russia. Like them or dislike them, but these missiles simply are nothing you should laugh at, no matter whether you like Russia or not.

  • umm allow me to go ahead and clear that up for you...

    NO...

    NO...

    and HELL NO!

    russian weapons are the best in the world! and the early warning system is probably the best as well!

  • What makes the Iskander so special? Seems like another surface-to-surface missile no?

  • range, CEP (for russian missile, not export), the fact tat it manuevres and in general, it has QUAZIballistic trajectory, not ballistic.

  • Good stuff. It is rather interesting.

  • Could US make a TOPOL-like ICBM? Sure, but why? US has no need to strike Russia anymore. TOPOL was a response to the Bush's dumb ABM. Bush is ruining America.

  • I agree, Bush is ruining america, but for my country, it is good ;) Napoleon said: "Never interrup your opponent if he is making a mistake".

  • Remember when people loved the US? It used to be a beacon of hope for the oppressed. Now we are the monsters and the new-nazi. I'm ashamed of our leadership and the last 8 years of this country.

  • Russia's ground forces are better because they always invisioned that they would face a ground invasion or would invade east europe. US never envisioned a ground invasion of US but more Navy/Air war.

  • Russia is inded lacking in Tactical aviation, informatisation of army and in Navy, but Russia has advantages over USA in army's firepower, strategic aviation (Russia has more and newer strategic bomber fleet), land forces, Anti-aircraft defence.

    Russia is catching up on iformatisation though, does USA catch up on land forces and other problem areas? doesn't look like it does.

  • Yes they are. The focus is to become more rapidly mobile. Not to pack a heavy punch that is slow to move around. Anti-Aircraft defense is questionable in the future with the advancement of Hypersonic cruise missiles the US is seeking.

  • US can catch up on ground. All they really need is a new MBT. US depends on it's airforce to win a war. Which is why Rus works hard on their SAM's. Avionics on US fighters are superior to that on Rus Aircraft. But too much dependance on AWAC's.

    Honestly there is no need for US to develop cold war stuff anymore. Rus vs US will never happen.

  • Russia can catch up on informatization and tactical aircrafts, in fact, Russa does do it. soon GLONASS will be up there and there we go.

    I agree that Russia vs US will never happen, and it is GOOD. Unless someone invents something groundbreaking, something more strategic than ICBms.

  • I doubt that will happen. there is no more communism. What we should worry about now is globalization and one world government. Here in the US it's the PATRIOT that will end our so-called freedom.

  • Topol is good... But a hypersonic cruise missile will be even better...

  • no, because it will be slower by definition.

  • well it won't have to leave earth to hit its target.

  • i love the russian boys!!tthe most beautifull of the world!!russi nº1!!!xxxx i love yoyu!!!niki the best russian,kisses love

  • i agree

  • everybody is superpower. nobody is above anybody. we are all equal. the truth is that we don't need any fucking lasers or nuclear warheads.just mind your own business. thats it.

  • The US is developing lasers for this type of russian garbage. Like the airborne laser on the modified 747, is designed to destroy missiles still in the atomosphere.

    Game over TOPOL. This is a futile attempt by Russian to Remain a world power while it's power is fleeting. China is Well on its way to top Russia.

  • Why are you Yank apes developing lasers 20 years after USSR closed down their program because of the laser's uselessness as a weapon?

    Ever heard of reflectivity? And that shitty 747 hasn't yet fired EVEN ONCE after 10 years of wasting your taxpayer money. Good luck, you need it.

  • BOTH of you are dumb!

    The modified 747 laser is NOT PRACTICAL for use against ICBM's, because the aircraft must be deployed only 600km away from the launch site. Obviously, Russia wouldn't permit a fleet of 747's to hover 600km away from its launch sites. As for soviet warrior, you're an idiot too. The modified laser HAS been tested, and PERFECT reflectivity is very difficult to achieve. The most microscopic imperfection makes the entire missle vulnerable. You don't know anything either.

  • It is "Star Wars". Science fiction. May be after 70-80 years it will be possible, but not at this moment. At first, modern lasers still requered too much energy and very large cryogenic equipment. At second, it is much more easy to resist laser beam using for, example, warhead rotation, reflected surface and gas cloud (in space, outside atmosphera). So, it is still far away to reach the task.

  • Still, DARPA concieved stealth in the 50's. Who knows what the US has ready now.

  • Russia has been dismissed SO MANY times before, but it always came up and defeated enemies, sqame will happen now.

    And in terms of technology, especially isisle technology, and presice sceinces, Russia is literally not challenged by anyone. Russia allready surpassed US in arms sales. Guess why?

    And new, heavy missile has been introduced for rocket troops. US's power is fleeting, not Russia's, so, get ready.

  • Russian weapons sales are great because Russia desperetly needs them. Plus they sell to any one. Russia is not ahead of US in tech of any sort. In terms of missiles, US becomes content with what it has and never seems to strive for a better one. Like why the hell didn't us build another set of ICBM's? Simple , the bulk of US research is based on weapons you wont see the next year. But in future wars.

  • Russia is not ahead in tech?? LOL.

    USA bought rocket engines from Russia and considered buying air to air missiles.

    USSR tested space laser 25 years ago, US only now got to this kind of tech.

    Russia currently researches for AJAX hypersonic aircraft. US cancelled the project because they could not solve problems with it.

    Please give me a break, US tech superiority is a HUGE myth. YES, Russia IS ahead.

  • Any references?

    It's not a huge MYTH...US is currently working on Hyper-x.

  • If Russia was ahead why haven't they produced a 5th gen fighter? AJAX is being developed to compete with Aurora. Russia is always playing "catch up". They excel in SAM/Missiles but that's about it.

  • Let's not forget quality of Russian tech as well....

  • Why don't you ask the countries that bought Russian weapons? After all, US has to pretty much bribe governments to offload their "quality" equipment.

  • Chinese have used PATRIOT guidance systems in the SAM missiles.

  • US has SHIVA STAR weapon.

  • It was made clear a long time ago that US intends to own space to further tighten it's grip on the world. I think Russia acts like this to save face in front of the world. They've been dismissed since the USSR fell and still are dismissed as world players.

  • If the country hadn't taken a nosedive 16 years ago, YOU would have to play catchup with Russia.

    You better be worried that US can't get very much ahead of Russia even today, despite the fact that very little money has been invested in Russian engineering firms.

  • No, because this country is too busy playing patty-cake with Iraq. You honestly think US is going to let Russia/China ahead of it self? SU-27 was made to counter f-15. I will only admit that their SAM's are better than American SAM's.

  • who cares what you will admit? You know nothing of military equipment, why would someone listen to you?

  • Buying rocket engines. Wow oh my god....

    Russia doesn't produce any good domestic products. cars/electronics etc... Yet u claim they are first in tech? US can afford to spend more. The world actually depends on American Commerce so our economy isn't going anywhere.

  • I'm not saying Russia is in the Stone Age. Their tech is up to date, but it is not as good as US tech. Most projects here don't suffer from financial constraints. Everything is made to counter US tech. f-15=su-27 PAK-FA=F/A 22, TOPOL=ABM.

  • ABm can not intercept normal missiles, let alone MIRV, and you are talking about hypersonic manuevering warheads of Topol? Read something before you post nonsense.

    Russia latest tech surpasses latest US tech. Iskander, S-400, T-90, TopolM, DOAB (new bomb), Tu-160

    Most projects here do not suffer from anything anymore either.

    YOUR projects suffer from inability to find technical solutions, your purchase of S-300 and rocket engines from Russia is example.

    How is USA better?

  • So russia has never looked at US tech? t-90 is a good tank. But US is focusing on methods that are changing warfare. There is nothing ground breaking about the TOPOLM, tu-160 is much like Valkerie, S-400 is like THAAD, t-90 has ARENA thats about it.

    Ok, F/A-22 will beat any *current* fighter and flanker variants. It will also destroy SAM's coined as "double-digit" SAM's this includes s-400. US has not developed new ICBM's because its not Cold war time anymore...

  • Russia DID copy US tech sometimes, but only when politicians decided to do so (famous carousell operation of copied bomber in 50's or 60's).

  • Their land based ICBM's are pretty decent too. Road mobile technology is THE way to go. I personally think that the Russians make better strategic decisions than us sometimes.

  • why do they need to mount it on a truck? if it travels around the world it would seem pointlees to have to move it around on a truck

  • If US invested even more than 8-9percent of its GDP than Russia would be far behind. The problem in the US is that companies serve themselves-not the American people. The US military doesn't necessarily by the best, only who has paid off senators....

  • Us IS behind in technology, it has to buy russina rocket engines and parts for sattelites, and enrich uranium in Russia.

    US can not afford spending more on military needs, since they are in debt allready. they increase military spenmding and boom, next thing you know, is their economy is down, or near it.