OK finally a religious claim. I can say this man's opinion is not compatible with science. Science does not make assumptions with testing it for evidence. So far there is no evidence that a God is responsible for the creation of the universe. There is no reason to add God just because we don't know. Remember to people like this God is a pocket of ever receding ignorance. Meaning when we say, God did it we usually discover a scientific reason for it down the line and our ignorance gets smaller.
The sun is complex. I don't understand who designed the nuclear reactions in it's center. That is why I believe in Ra the sun god. It was the simplest way to explain it.
Some eggs were laid too early and too late but they all died and left only the ones who got it right. There is a name for this process, it is call evolution.
@gregrutz There is only one God. Yes, a scrambling of the DNA code, information, that already exists. Just like any other language, if the reader does not comprehend the information it is considered foolishness and corrected accordingly. DNA is a self correcting code. If something is out of place it will attempt to fix the error. So again, what "new information" are you talking about? and what exactly do you mean by evolution?
@Flareondf2 I don't believe in ''new information'' It is something Meyers made up when ID failed.
Most of the species that ever lived on the planet are extinct, no dinos, no sabertooth tigers, no Neanderthal Man. The Theory of Evolution explains the fossil record and how life changed over millions of years.
@gregrutz I hope you aren't suggesting that because "...humans are classified as primates." that is proof of evolution. You might classify a whale as a mammal because it births a child or for whatever reason. Likewise, I may classify it as a fish because it lives in the water. Does that the change the fact that it is a whale? No. Classification is a matter how you define something, it doesn't actually mean anything.
@Flareondf2 No, they were classified by their anatomy. But some things like mushroom are hard to classify until DNA was decoded. DNA proves Neanderthals were human but not us, a different kind of human.
@gregrutz Classification is determined by definition. My definition of a fish fits a whale therefore a whale is a fish. Classification means nothing. Was Neanderthal human? Yes, a human with arthritis. Haha you are so easily distracted, back to the real issue. We all have the same facts and your interpretation of the facts is determined by your worldview, creation or evolution. Niether creation nor evolution are science, they are simply interpretations of the facts, science.
@gregrutz Hahaha I do not believe everything everyone tells me, but you yourself are quick to believe what a man tells you are you not? You don't know me, I HAVE looked at the fossil record, biology, and geology and I have come to the conclusion that the Bible is true. It is NOT a fact that the world is millions of years old. Just because you say it doesn't make it true. Neanderthals may not be homo sapian sapian. What does that prove? Nothing. So what do you have? Nothing.
@gregrutz I can also say that my creation worldview explains the world as we see it today, but lets look at the evolution worldview. How do you know that life has changed over millions of years?
@gregrutz So for you, heredity is the same as evolution?
Me having different DNA than my parents results from having received a combination of my parents DNA that was already there. There isn't any NEW information being added to my DNA that wasn't already in existence before. Rather, my DNA is a scrambling of what my parents already had.
That said, how can new DNA ever be added to an organism? Keep in mind this is what evolution requires to make totally brand new traits in organisms.
@krownzera Evolution is a change in a breeding groups DNA. Your DNA did not exist until you were conceived. And change in DNA is 'new information'' OLD DNA [mom/dad] + Me having different DNA than my parents [new DNA} = new information
@gregrutz All of the DNA I have is from either my mom or my dad, none of it is new. The scrambling of their DNA is not new information.
A deck of cards has 52 cards (4 different suits contained 13 cards each). If the deck is shuffled and put into a different order, that does not mean those card numbers and suits have changed and new ones are thus created from the shuffling. The cards numbers and suits that already existed are just reordered differently than they were before.
@krownzera DNA is not read as a single 'card'. The DNA code is a 3 letter code so you can have the same Nucleotides in a different order and get new information.
Remember Darwin did not even know about mutations and still showed how evolution works.
@gregrutz How does the reordering of something mean there has been new information added to it? Reordering doesn't create new information, it creates a new combination because it is made up of the information that was already present prior to the reordering.
Think about it. I can only reorder the letters A, B, and C so many times and I will run out of unique combinations. The reordering will not create a letter D. Why? Because there isn't any new information added to get that letter.
@krownzera A, B ,C can be arraged into 18 different 'codes' abc, acb, aab, aac, bbb. etc. Each one of these 3 letter combinations codes for one of 18 different amino acids. The I8 different amino acids can be in a billion combinations to make a protein. A change in just one amino acid can totally change the shape and structure of the enzyme the DNA is making. A New protein from ''new information''
@gregrutz First, it is a scrambling of existing information not new information. Second, just because there are x number of combinations means nothing because DNA is essentially a code and is read by a decoder. If the decoder can't make sense of the code it doesn't work. It does not create a new trait. The incorrect information is corrected. Most importantly is the fact that DNA is information and information can only arise from an intelligence. So the question is who designed DNA? God
@gregrutz Who said anything about Allah? I'm talking about the one true, living God, you know the God of the Bible, not nonexistent pseudo-gods. What do you mean by "new information"?
@gregrutz According to God, he doesn't know of any other God than himself.
Isaiah44:8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
The Catholic Church accepted evolution for the same reason they accepted Galileo's claim that the earth is not the center of everything and the bible was wrong, because it was proven to them. They just say it was guided by God. It is obvious to anyone who looks at it.
@gregrutz "God never said how it was made, the bible does".
Nice subtle attempt to make it sound like you know what GOD SAID outside of the Bible. I'm sure you're referring to that big, political organization that uses paganism in the form of Christianity as it's base for "what God said" What a sucker you are.
@gregrutz Well, I KNOW what God said, I have his word and he speaks through his word. The phrase "it is written" appears 80 times in the Bible, that's why God wrote it down so I can read it and have his promises. He's an example
Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for IT IS WRITTEN, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
@gregrutz What part could you not understand? You don't know what a curse is? You don't know what it means to be redeemed? "As it is written" means it was written down already in the old testament as a law to be followed (Deut 21:22) and Christ was made a curse FOR US so that he could make the payment for our sins. Got it now?
@gregrutz God cursed the ground. (Gen.3:17) Everything you eat comes from the ground, that's why you die and there's no way to avoid it. The curse of sin is death. Jesus died on "the tree" for us, he took the curse for us when he died on the cross. Redemption is getting something you PAID for that has been on hold. The OT saints (for example) were saved but NOT redeemed since Jesus Christ has not made the payment yet. The payment has been made and salvation now includes redemption.
@KingJamesBible So God the Father, god #1, sent his Son, god #2, to earth and we killed Him. And that made God #1 so happy that he forgave us Adam's sins. Right?
@gregrutz There is no god #1, 2, etc. There is ONE God ONLY and any good catholic should know this as it just happenes to be Catholic teaching as well as Bible teaching. One of the FEW things we should be agreeing to.
1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, (SAME God, not a DIFFERENT one) justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
@krownzera People don't do 'science study' like you do bible study, where they are told what stuff means, People repeat the experiments, look at the evidence and study the different theories
@gregrutz Regardless of what kind of study it is, a person's worldview prior to doing an experiment or study has a significant influence on how they will interpret any results found. There is no such thing as not having a bias. You may like to believe the fields of science are completely objective, but everyone, including scientists, have a prejudice. It is no surprise that many secular thinkers like yourself will attribute the creation to a secular and idolatrous cause like evolution.
@krownzera Correct, I look at dinosaur fossils and with my education and scientific thinking bias tells me that really big lizards with their legs under them were the dominant life form on the earth since there are no large mammal fossils around. And they didn't eat fruit becase there are no seed fossils found either. And thing have change because the trilobite use to be top dog but there are very few of them like in the lower levels of strata. What do you think about dinosaurs with feather?
@gregrutz Before I answer, I have a few basic questions to help clarify your statement:
What qualifies trilobites as "top dog"? By the sheer numbers of them found in the layers of strata or some other factor?
So in general, do more recent dinosaurs have feathers and older ones do not? If so, where did this new genetic information come from? I thought natural selection merely selects from a preexisting gene pool. I did not know it could create completely new genetic information too.
@gregrutz "Natural selection does select from the traits already there. Variation in species happens for it to work on."
Yes, yes, that is all observed and confirmed. However, that does not answer the question: Where did the new genetic information for feathers come from in order for dinosaurs to have feathers later on in their existence? Or are you saying that the genetic information for feathers has always been something that dinosaurs carried in their DNA since the beginning?
@gregrutz Variations within kinds is far from NEW information being added to the genetic structure of existing organisms, let alone non-living things.
I have different DNA than either one of my parents. Have I evolved? No. It's just variation resulting from the existing genes that were passed down to me from my parents.
Toothpicks and cabinets are both made of wood. Does that mean they have a common ancestor, or is the material or the two just an ideal material used o design something?
@gregrutz the world is intelligent. everything here is intelligent. HOW can any of this have come by itself. No one has ever seen any of this happen. ever. everything we have seen has been MADE/CREATED one way or another. but the origin of the whole Universe, happened by itself? Romans 1:20 says: For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
@gregrutz If you study science with an open mind, you will find God. why are there so many flood legends? (over 300 around the world) Why are there so many Dragon legends? Dinosaur is a word invented in the 1800's, before then, they were called dragons. There is nothing new under the sun. things are always created from what people observe. Legends may be skewed but they never come from the clear blue sky.
@AmmerBros flood legends> people lived near water, floods are common.
Dinosaurs did not exist until scientists found and named them. Dragons are a myth, no real evidence. Where are the dragon bones? Dinosaurs stopped making fossils 65 million years ago.
@gregrutz I don't think it was common for dragons to breath fire but the bible talks about one called Leviathan that did. That's all I know. also ALL of the flood legends say, 8 people on a boat had animals on it and the flood covered the whole world. some of the info is skewed but it is disturbingly accurate. also, if you would forget your silly metaphysical research project (because that's what evolution is) you could learn real science.
@AmmerBros You talk about fire breathing dragons and 29,000 feet of waters receeding to who knows where, and all the animals in world getting on one boat then tell me to learn real science ?!? Creatard !
@gregrutz first of all, all I said was the bible said there was one, that's all I know I can't prove it. second, the mountains came up after the waters receded and "the fountains of the deep broke open" in genesis which means not much of the water was from rain. third, no fish, no birds and no bugs on the ark, God made the KINDS of animals and told Noah how big to build the ark. 2 of each basic kind is no problem.
@AmmerBros Which one of Noah's pure noble family members had crabs, herpes, syphilis and Chlamydia since most human diseases including STDs can't survive outside the human body?
@gregrutz The population hadn't been around very long so there wasn't as many problems in their DNA. Most STDs happen because people have sex with multiple people instead of sticking to one person. evolution says their is no God which means you can do whatever you want, like have sex with anyone which causes STDs. lol don't go there.
@gregrutz comparing what you believe to what I believe, I only have a minor problem. You have to prove that everything we see here came from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, animals produces something other than their kind, why petrified trees connect all of your so called "layers" in the geologic collum. Look, all of evolution was created to get rid of God. That's what it does. it is opposite to the bible. ON purpose.
@gregrutz and you want me to believe that everything in the world came from 1 cell and multiplied into everything we see today and no one has ever seen animals produce anything besides their kind. I don't think what I'm saying is too far fetched.
@gregrutz "Dogs make dogs, apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes." you can say this all you want like some mantra but that doesn't explain how it happened. it's very silly. You still haven't told me how it happened. no one can because missing links are called missing links for a reason. they're missing. actually there are none. lol you wont find any.
@gregrutz actually I'm wrong there were birds but that's still no problem and Noah was smart don't tell me he brought big animals on the ark, he probably brought babies. Also, don't go and say I wasn't there so I don't know because that's crap and you know it. you have way more to prove than I do. we have a book that told us what happened and a world of proof. the world is covered in mostly water. That's where the water went LMAO
@gregrutz well we both know it didn't happen by chance or natural selection. (by the way, what is the thing that is selecting? even if this thing selects, it isn't creating anything new.) so if both of these don't explain evolution I'd love to hear how it happened because I won't know until someone tells me.
@gregrutz "they can't make themselves" Of course, NOTHING makes itself. A watch is just a simple man-made example which illustrates this principle and a watch is nothing in compared to what God has made.
@gregrutz So you disagree with the biblical account of creation as recorded in Genesis 1? Or do you think that it is compatible with evolutionary theory? (I'm just trying to understand where you're coming from.)
@krownzera Read the first page of the bible and tell me it was not written by men who thought the earth was flat and the center of everything. The earth was never 'without form'' or ''void''
The universe is 13.7 billion years old, does that match the bible?
Does the bible explain why we are primates?
Does the bible say the kangaroos hopped to Australia from Turkey but no where else?
@gregrutz Nice abstract claim. Now where is your support for it? How do you KNOW God is not a He? Have fun proving that, especially with science.
By the way, this seems to be an argument you like to use time and time again: how much evidence would it take for you to realize that God is a He? (Note the biased implication of the question)
Prophecy alone speaks to the Bible's credibility. Check it out sometime, or do you already have some escape plan to rationalize that truth in your mind as well?
@gregrutz Hahaha, wow. Do you always make up spontaneous and unrelated arguments? When did I make any such assertion? Please stay on topic and quit trying to shift the focus off of yourself because you have no valid answer.
But yes, God does have a throne in heaven as mentioned in Psalm 45:6, 47:8, Hebrews 1:8 and numerous other places in scripture.
@gregrutz Lol. I would agree your god does not need to sit down, because he does not exist. What kind of god would use death, trial and error, and take millions of years to get something worthwhile to come into existence. Your god sounds pretty dumb.
The one true God spoke the universe into being and did it right the first time.
"Your God didn't even have a heaven 6000 years ago." So are you saying that my God does in fact exist, but does not have a heaven in which He dwells?
@gregrutz Oh by the way, I just noticed your comment to KJB which says, "I don't know what God said, he is supernatural. Hint, he does not talk to people."
Yet earlier, you said to me that God is not a He. Way to contradict yourself, which one is it?
Trilobites are a well-known fossil group of extinct marine arthropods that form the class Trilobita. The first appearance of trilobites in the fossil record defines the base of the Atdabanian stage of the Early Cambrian period (526 million years ago), and they flourished throughout the lower Paleozoic era before beginning a drawn-out decline to extinction when, during the Devonian, almost all trilobite orders, with the sole exception of Proetida, died out. Any questions?
@gregrutz trilobite fossils are found WITH human footprints as well as dinosaurs.
If you search you can find many examples. All those periods are just made up to make you think the earth is millions of years old, it's not. The long names are given to to "impress", it doesn't. The story of what happened regarding them is made up, just like a fairy tale, which what it is.
@gregrutz After the flood of Noah men were walking around the earth, if you believe the Bible (I do) a footprint with a trilobyte could easily have been made... MANY times and that's just ONE way. Grants are given ONLY for so-called proof of evolution. If any of the white robed cult brings in evidence for creation that can not be SPUN to make it appear like evolution, it's discarded. You mean you don't know this? tsk tsk and you probably think only the financial world is corrupt?
@KingJamesBible Trilobites live in the ocean, you are not going to find human footprints with them. Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, you won't find humans prints with then either.
How can scientists show evidence for creation? There is none. Which creation story do you mean?
@gregrutz "There is no cult pushing evolution" Where have you been? The Roman Catholic church ONLY in recent years (last 50 or so) started pushing evolution. It's part of the "official" doctrine with a SPIN on it allowing for God to be the one who started it. It's STILL EVOLUTION and a clear rejection of what God said and HOW he made everything.
I am so sorry for the people that consider that there is no creator or creators. I am sure that there could be one or many designers. For those who believe that there is no designer behind the creation of nature i suggest to check the definition of AXIOM.In traditional logic, an axiom or postulate is a proposition that is not proven or demonstrated but considered to be either self-evident, or subject to necessary decision. People and all are created by a force. And that is an Axiom.
@tallliza What I see from your comment is basically "you can only be qualified if you believe in evolution because that' what smart people do." "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" Romans 1:22
Remember that there were only two of these fish from the beginning. Genius, absolutely genius, programming and coding to keep these fish alive and prosperous. The more we study science, the closer we get to see intelligent design, and further away we get from evolution.
The fact that alot of animals have eyes, and other organs, and human as well, doesn't mean that we are somehow related. It means that we have a common designer. We all live on the same planet, with the same light from the sun, why would everything be different if the first design was perfect from the beginning? I haven't met atheists who look at things at a wider perspective, they only settle for the first best thing that's comforting for them.
@PirateXzibit Study the constrcution of the human eye. It`s an excellent piece of evidence for evolution. NO intelligent being would put the eye together like it is.
@tallliza I've heard this one before, "the lens is in the wrong spot, octopi have better eyes." wel its quite obvious to me that we don't live in water so we are in direct contact with the sun. UV rays, X rays. we're open to it. it would only be smart for a designer to protect or eyes. Octopi live in the water, and water blocks those rays. you can trade your eyes for an octopus's eyes, if you want to burn them out.
Daniel...I can't help but feel sorry for anyone who promotes such NONSENSE. What makes you so sure that your undestanding is correct or CONFIRMED ! You have NO PROOF and yet you promote this with NO CONFIRMATION ! How can you say your ideals according to God are right and the other religions are wrong ? This video is dated ..similar to the bible as it's beginning to sound silly as the years pass and evolution becomes more known...What about DNA ? How come it shows are relationship with Apes?
The fact that this video is old is on PURPOSE. Science that is good stays good. As far as DNA goes, it's so complicated that only Intelligence could have put it together. Evolution suggests that IT (evolution) IS that "intelligence"
I've even heard evolutionists says phrases as follows:
* As evolution dictates
* According to evolution
* As we expect from evolution
Phrases like this "imply loosly" that evolution ITSELF is THE intelligence. Thus they take away what belongs to God.
@gregrutz all of these arguments against God have to assume God in the first place. it's like denying the existence of oxygen. you have to take a breath in to even say anything like "I can't see oxygen so it doesn't exist"
@gregrutz why is gravity always working? how do you know you can always trust it? you have to have faith. it's just like you don't look at a building and wonder if there is a builder, you don't look at a painting and wonder if there is a painter. In the same respect you don't look at creation and wonder "hmmm did someone make this?" the reason evolution was made up was, people didn't like god's rules. Get rid of God, you can do whatever you want. after all, your just an ape.
@gregrutz you can't even know that for sure. the same as you can't know if the Earth was billions of years old because, there is no proof, (actually much proof against it) humans and primates have a 95% similarity. now that seems very close but guess what, every percent has a 48,000,000 nucleotide difference, and a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal for any animal? let me know how this happened by chance.
@gregrutz lol this makes me laugh. Natural selection is not a creative force. it selects. its like quality contol. it doesnt create anything new, it makes sure nothing is bad. you wont get a flat screen tv by making sure a cell phone works.
@gregrutz Because it's quite simple. Science are things we can observe test and demonstrate. Evolution can't be observed. no one has ever seen it happen, it can't be tested. trust me people have tried. and no one can demonstrate it. evolution is Religious and non scientific.
@AmmerBros Evolution has been observed in the lab and in nature. It is tested every day by creatards and hasn't been proven wrong. Science does not use the supernatural so Biology is not a religion.
@gregrutz seriously. lol it amazes me how people believe in such an insane theory. No one has EVER seen a dog produce anything but a dog. yet, most of the world believes it must have happened. it blows my mind. its like saying "man I have this watch, and I can't see who made it so it must have made itself." that statement is silly. you don't look at creation and wonder if someone made it. its so impossble for this world to happen by itself. People only believe it because it removes God.
@AmmerBros Same KIND, Yes. Dogs make dogs, apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes, still mammals, still vertebrates and still animals. You can't outgrow your ancestry.
@gregrutz also, you say that evolution isn't by chance, well then you must be a Creationist because there are really only two options. Either it happened by chance or it was intentional. There are no other options. so you said "Evolution doesn't happen by chance." you are saying that it was intentional, which implies and intelligence. Man, you're a creationist!
@AmmerBros Why can't creationists see the forces of nature. Does a rock need intelligence to know which way to fall? Does an atom need to be told what other atoms it can interact with?
And yes there is a lot of chance involved, learn about quantum mechanics and you will see the whole universe is run by chance.
@gregrutz wasn't it you who said "a watch isn't alive"? well hello a rock isn't alive. it doesn't know anything. but it never falls up. Everyone knows that mount rushmore was created, but you will probably say that george washington and his 10 trillion cells happened by chance. btw you are basically saying that nature is the intelligence. where did it get that from? and you'll say nowhere. I'm sorry, this is ludicrous. absolutely impossible for any of this to get here on it's own.
@gregrutz By the way, what do you have to prove? NOTHING. If you are right, then heck, I lived a good life and I get turned into a plant or a butterfly or whatever. but crap, if I'm right, you got a real problem on your hands.
There are only two possibilities, there either is a God or there isn't.
look man, God loves you. You are a big deal to him.
but you don't want him, all you're trying to prove is, there is no purpose, and we go nowhere when we die. That's so depressing.
@gregrutz lol that's funny. haha good one. I brought God up because he is the most important and evolution tries to get rid of him. Of course you wouldn't bring him up. I'm sure you feel very uncomfortable with me talking about God. Well, guess what, he's my savior and I will talk about him and bring him up till the cows come home, and NOTHING can't be explained without him. that's why.
@gregrutz I think it's funny how you assume you can relate what evolution says about the world to what the Bible clearly teaches. Evolution says the present is the key to the past. The Bible does not say that. According to the Bible the world was alot different. So if you want to have a valid argument about me, you might want to get your facts straight about what creation actually teaches.
@gregrutz I think it's funny how you think you can relate what evolution says about the world to what the Bible clearly teaches. Evolution says the present is the key to the past. The bible says the past is the key to the present. So when you try to take what you see in the world today and disprove the bible, you are making a "straw-man" argument. If you want to disprove the bible, get your facts straight.
@gregrutz ......you see fossils of monkeys......... you see fossils of Humans......... where are the fossils of stages in between? ..........evolution disproved.
@KingJamesBible '' * As we expect from evolution'' And if everything didn't go ''according to evolution'' it would be proven wrong. But everthing fits.
@KingJamesBible Disagree. Are we evolveing to be better what? At swimming? At jumping? Better at surviving is all that evolution does. Survival of the fittest really means most things die. Most of the species that ever lived on the earth ARE extinct: No dinosaurs, sabertooth tigers, neaderthal man, trilobites, etc.
@gregrutz How do you know "most" species" that ever lived are gone? Have you seen them? Counted them? Compared this number (which you don't have) with how many "species" today?? I know you're just talking out of your hat. You are just mimicking an "evolution mantra" there are trilobites still around TODAY and neanderthal man was proven a COMPLETE HOAX years ago. Dinosaur means terrible lizrard. We still have lizards TODAY, just smaller due to the change of condition from Noah's flood.
@KingJamesBible It is called the fossil record. That is what we are trying to explain. You just deny it. Yes they count them, 30,000 species of dinosaurs. Yes dinos are lizards just like humans are mammals.
Neaderthal DNA proves we did not evolve from them, happy now. They were a different kind of human. There were 2 or more kinds of humans on the earth at one time. Yes we still have fish and lizards and trilobites today, does that mean something to you?
@TheBoopski@6.20~6.24min/sec's, my favorite, the bat with on board radar.
+ when theres 100's of them flying together they must also have to regulate frequency or may be they were designed with custom pitch?. Either way the on board CPU is very clever to control flight , multi scan-multi surfaces at speed, remember to eat , find a partner .... . Its amazing to me that any could think it might happen by chance. "The Jesus factor" makes a lot of sense though. Jesus knows your frequency Boop's.
@TheBoopski apes are 95% similar to humans yeah that sounds real close but when you get right down to it, that's a 48,000,000 nucleotide difference for each percent! guess what. a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal for ANY animal. you mean to tell me that this all happened by chance? please. don't be silly. what you said is like saying "man Oxygen is dated, we don't need it anymore. let's make something else up" When you need it to SURVIVE. just as you need God. and he loves you immensely.
@AmmerBros it always amazes me how a BELIEVER such as yourself can trample over facts as if you know(not guess) that your right and the worlds "Most Intelligent" scientist are wrong in regards to Evolution and common decent of man. Ever hear of Endogenous retrovirus(ERVs), Fused chromosome #2, Neanderthal DNA compared to our DNA and of course SUMMATION ? You have NO IDEAL how those things alone show who we are and where we came from. Quit living and promoting the "FAIRYTALE" it's outright lying!
@AmmerBros you might want to research a few more things that solidify EVOLUTION and proof that the GOD of the bible is completely made up. Biblical scholarship can show you that for starts. But as to proving evolution--> LOOK INTO : Embryology~Comparative anatomy~genetics~Molecular biology and Paleintology. Then to verify what I said according to THE KING JAMES BIBLE..."The bible chronology" which says according to the bible that the EARTH can only be 6000 years old ! Does that makes sense ?
OK finally a religious claim. I can say this man's opinion is not compatible with science. Science does not make assumptions with testing it for evidence. So far there is no evidence that a God is responsible for the creation of the universe. There is no reason to add God just because we don't know. Remember to people like this God is a pocket of ever receding ignorance. Meaning when we say, God did it we usually discover a scientific reason for it down the line and our ignorance gets smaller.
AtheistStrikeForce 1 week ago
The sun is complex. I don't understand who designed the nuclear reactions in it's center. That is why I believe in Ra the sun god. It was the simplest way to explain it.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
very beautiful video.
22complexity 1 month ago
Some eggs were laid too early and too late but they all died and left only the ones who got it right. There is a name for this process, it is call evolution.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz There is only one God. Yes, a scrambling of the DNA code, information, that already exists. Just like any other language, if the reader does not comprehend the information it is considered foolishness and corrected accordingly. DNA is a self correcting code. If something is out of place it will attempt to fix the error. So again, what "new information" are you talking about? and what exactly do you mean by evolution?
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 I don't believe in ''new information'' It is something Meyers made up when ID failed.
Most of the species that ever lived on the planet are extinct, no dinos, no sabertooth tigers, no Neanderthal Man. The Theory of Evolution explains the fossil record and how life changed over millions of years.
And why humans are classified as primates.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz I hope you aren't suggesting that because "...humans are classified as primates." that is proof of evolution. You might classify a whale as a mammal because it births a child or for whatever reason. Likewise, I may classify it as a fish because it lives in the water. Does that the change the fact that it is a whale? No. Classification is a matter how you define something, it doesn't actually mean anything.
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 ' I may classify it as a fish because it lives in the water.''
Animals are classified by their DNA which show that whales are not closely related to fish, and you just said they are mammals.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz So animals cannot be classified without their DNA?
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 No, they were classified by their anatomy. But some things like mushroom are hard to classify until DNA was decoded. DNA proves Neanderthals were human but not us, a different kind of human.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Classification is determined by definition. My definition of a fish fits a whale therefore a whale is a fish. Classification means nothing. Was Neanderthal human? Yes, a human with arthritis. Haha you are so easily distracted, back to the real issue. We all have the same facts and your interpretation of the facts is determined by your worldview, creation or evolution. Niether creation nor evolution are science, they are simply interpretations of the facts, science.
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 All 600 of the Neanderthals did not ahve arthritis, creationist bull shit.
Your worldview means you believe anything your pastor tell you because you have never looked at the fossil record or geology or biology.
It is a fact that the world is millions of years old, not an interpratation.
It is a fact that Neaderthals are not HOMO SAPIAN SAPIANS. DNA proves it.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Hahaha I do not believe everything everyone tells me, but you yourself are quick to believe what a man tells you are you not? You don't know me, I HAVE looked at the fossil record, biology, and geology and I have come to the conclusion that the Bible is true. It is NOT a fact that the world is millions of years old. Just because you say it doesn't make it true. Neanderthals may not be homo sapian sapian. What does that prove? Nothing. So what do you have? Nothing.
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@gregrutz I can also say that my creation worldview explains the world as we see it today, but lets look at the evolution worldview. How do you know that life has changed over millions of years?
Flareondf2 2 months ago
I have different DNA than either one of my parents. Have I evolved?
YES !
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz So for you, heredity is the same as evolution?
Me having different DNA than my parents results from having received a combination of my parents DNA that was already there. There isn't any NEW information being added to my DNA that wasn't already in existence before. Rather, my DNA is a scrambling of what my parents already had.
That said, how can new DNA ever be added to an organism? Keep in mind this is what evolution requires to make totally brand new traits in organisms.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera Evolution is a change in a breeding groups DNA. Your DNA did not exist until you were conceived. And change in DNA is 'new information'' OLD DNA [mom/dad] + Me having different DNA than my parents [new DNA} = new information
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz All of the DNA I have is from either my mom or my dad, none of it is new. The scrambling of their DNA is not new information.
A deck of cards has 52 cards (4 different suits contained 13 cards each). If the deck is shuffled and put into a different order, that does not mean those card numbers and suits have changed and new ones are thus created from the shuffling. The cards numbers and suits that already existed are just reordered differently than they were before.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera DNA is not read as a single 'card'. The DNA code is a 3 letter code so you can have the same Nucleotides in a different order and get new information.
Remember Darwin did not even know about mutations and still showed how evolution works.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz How does the reordering of something mean there has been new information added to it? Reordering doesn't create new information, it creates a new combination because it is made up of the information that was already present prior to the reordering.
Think about it. I can only reorder the letters A, B, and C so many times and I will run out of unique combinations. The reordering will not create a letter D. Why? Because there isn't any new information added to get that letter.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera A, B ,C can be arraged into 18 different 'codes' abc, acb, aab, aac, bbb. etc. Each one of these 3 letter combinations codes for one of 18 different amino acids. The I8 different amino acids can be in a billion combinations to make a protein. A change in just one amino acid can totally change the shape and structure of the enzyme the DNA is making. A New protein from ''new information''
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz First, it is a scrambling of existing information not new information. Second, just because there are x number of combinations means nothing because DNA is essentially a code and is read by a decoder. If the decoder can't make sense of the code it doesn't work. It does not create a new trait. The incorrect information is corrected. Most importantly is the fact that DNA is information and information can only arise from an intelligence. So the question is who designed DNA? God
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 Allah did it?
So how do you get the new information?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Who said anything about Allah? I'm talking about the one true, living God, you know the God of the Bible, not nonexistent pseudo-gods. What do you mean by "new information"?
Flareondf2 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 You were talking about God but didn't say which one.
Darwin did not know about ID's 'new information' but had no problem showing how evolution works
gregrutz 2 months ago
@Flareondf2 ''First, it is a scrambling of existing information '' NO, it's a scrambling of the DNA code making new proteins.
gregrutz 2 months ago
Believe in a God? Which one?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz According to God, he doesn't know of any other God than himself.
Isaiah44:8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible
And there is no such a thing as religion too. Religion is bad.
Noobstur323 4 weeks ago
The Catholic Church accepted evolution for the same reason they accepted Galileo's claim that the earth is not the center of everything and the bible was wrong, because it was proven to them. They just say it was guided by God. It is obvious to anyone who looks at it.
God never said how it was made, the bible does.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "God never said how it was made, the bible does".
Nice subtle attempt to make it sound like you know what GOD SAID outside of the Bible. I'm sure you're referring to that big, political organization that uses paganism in the form of Christianity as it's base for "what God said" What a sucker you are.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible I don't know what God said, he is supernatural. Hint, he does not talk to people. If you hear voices you need help.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Well, I KNOW what God said, I have his word and he speaks through his word. The phrase "it is written" appears 80 times in the Bible, that's why God wrote it down so I can read it and have his promises. He's an example
Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for IT IS WRITTEN, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible What is that in secular English?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz What part could you not understand? You don't know what a curse is? You don't know what it means to be redeemed? "As it is written" means it was written down already in the old testament as a law to be followed (Deut 21:22) and Christ was made a curse FOR US so that he could make the payment for our sins. Got it now?
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible No, I have no idea what a curse is. What is redeemed? The old testament is for the Jews.
''Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree'' I don't hang on trees so I guess you are wrong.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz God cursed the ground. (Gen.3:17) Everything you eat comes from the ground, that's why you die and there's no way to avoid it. The curse of sin is death. Jesus died on "the tree" for us, he took the curse for us when he died on the cross. Redemption is getting something you PAID for that has been on hold. The OT saints (for example) were saved but NOT redeemed since Jesus Christ has not made the payment yet. The payment has been made and salvation now includes redemption.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible So God the Father, god #1, sent his Son, god #2, to earth and we killed Him. And that made God #1 so happy that he forgave us Adam's sins. Right?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz There is no god #1, 2, etc. There is ONE God ONLY and any good catholic should know this as it just happenes to be Catholic teaching as well as Bible teaching. One of the FEW things we should be agreeing to.
1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, (SAME God, not a DIFFERENT one) justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible Do you believe everything that men write?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Do you believe everything that men (evolutionary scientists and the like) write?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera People don't do 'science study' like you do bible study, where they are told what stuff means, People repeat the experiments, look at the evidence and study the different theories
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Regardless of what kind of study it is, a person's worldview prior to doing an experiment or study has a significant influence on how they will interpret any results found. There is no such thing as not having a bias. You may like to believe the fields of science are completely objective, but everyone, including scientists, have a prejudice. It is no surprise that many secular thinkers like yourself will attribute the creation to a secular and idolatrous cause like evolution.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera Correct, I look at dinosaur fossils and with my education and scientific thinking bias tells me that really big lizards with their legs under them were the dominant life form on the earth since there are no large mammal fossils around. And they didn't eat fruit becase there are no seed fossils found either. And thing have change because the trilobite use to be top dog but there are very few of them like in the lower levels of strata. What do you think about dinosaurs with feather?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Before I answer, I have a few basic questions to help clarify your statement:
What qualifies trilobites as "top dog"? By the sheer numbers of them found in the layers of strata or some other factor?
So in general, do more recent dinosaurs have feathers and older ones do not? If so, where did this new genetic information come from? I thought natural selection merely selects from a preexisting gene pool. I did not know it could create completely new genetic information too.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera Trilobites were the most advanced life form on the earth at one time, top dog since there were not dogs.
Dinosaurs changec over 3 major time periods. The recent ones have feathers, we call them birds.
Natural selection does select from the traits already there. Variation in species happens for it to work on.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "Natural selection does select from the traits already there. Variation in species happens for it to work on."
Yes, yes, that is all observed and confirmed. However, that does not answer the question: Where did the new genetic information for feathers come from in order for dinosaurs to have feathers later on in their existence? Or are you saying that the genetic information for feathers has always been something that dinosaurs carried in their DNA since the beginning?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera So you agree evolution happens but don't understand why scientists don't know everything about the Theory.
Feathers are made of the same thing as scales, look at a turkey's leg, it slowly changes to feathers.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Variations within kinds is far from NEW information being added to the genetic structure of existing organisms, let alone non-living things.
I have different DNA than either one of my parents. Have I evolved? No. It's just variation resulting from the existing genes that were passed down to me from my parents.
Toothpicks and cabinets are both made of wood. Does that mean they have a common ancestor, or is the material or the two just an ideal material used o design something?
krownzera 2 months ago
how can blind chance make a seeing eye?
why are human fossils found in the same strata as dinosaur fossils?
how can you get something from nothing?
if the "spinning thing" in the big bang makes everything spin one way, why do planets and moons spin different ways?
why isn't matter distributed evenly?
How do stars form?
why are there still comets?
why is the largest desert 4200 years old?
why did the population curve start about 4400 years ago?
AmmerBros 2 months ago
Watches are not alive so they can't make themselves.
No one says evolution is just by chance, that is a strawman argument
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz the world is intelligent. everything here is intelligent. HOW can any of this have come by itself. No one has ever seen any of this happen. ever. everything we have seen has been MADE/CREATED one way or another. but the origin of the whole Universe, happened by itself? Romans 1:20 says: For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz If you study science with an open mind, you will find God. why are there so many flood legends? (over 300 around the world) Why are there so many Dragon legends? Dinosaur is a word invented in the 1800's, before then, they were called dragons. There is nothing new under the sun. things are always created from what people observe. Legends may be skewed but they never come from the clear blue sky.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros flood legends> people lived near water, floods are common.
Dinosaurs did not exist until scientists found and named them. Dragons are a myth, no real evidence. Where are the dragon bones? Dinosaurs stopped making fossils 65 million years ago.
Do you really think an animal can breath fire?
Science does not use legends as evidence.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz I don't think it was common for dragons to breath fire but the bible talks about one called Leviathan that did. That's all I know. also ALL of the flood legends say, 8 people on a boat had animals on it and the flood covered the whole world. some of the info is skewed but it is disturbingly accurate. also, if you would forget your silly metaphysical research project (because that's what evolution is) you could learn real science.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros You talk about fire breathing dragons and 29,000 feet of waters receeding to who knows where, and all the animals in world getting on one boat then tell me to learn real science ?!? Creatard !
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz first of all, all I said was the bible said there was one, that's all I know I can't prove it. second, the mountains came up after the waters receded and "the fountains of the deep broke open" in genesis which means not much of the water was from rain. third, no fish, no birds and no bugs on the ark, God made the KINDS of animals and told Noah how big to build the ark. 2 of each basic kind is no problem.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Which one of Noah's pure noble family members had crabs, herpes, syphilis and Chlamydia since most human diseases including STDs can't survive outside the human body?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz The population hadn't been around very long so there wasn't as many problems in their DNA. Most STDs happen because people have sex with multiple people instead of sticking to one person. evolution says their is no God which means you can do whatever you want, like have sex with anyone which causes STDs. lol don't go there.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz comparing what you believe to what I believe, I only have a minor problem. You have to prove that everything we see here came from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, animals produces something other than their kind, why petrified trees connect all of your so called "layers" in the geologic collum. Look, all of evolution was created to get rid of God. That's what it does. it is opposite to the bible. ON purpose.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros If you understood how evolution works then you would know how it happened. Take a biology class.
gregrutz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz You still haven't answered the 4 great questions of life. I don't think you can either.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz and you want me to believe that everything in the world came from 1 cell and multiplied into everything we see today and no one has ever seen animals produce anything besides their kind. I don't think what I'm saying is too far fetched.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Dogs make dogs, apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "Dogs make dogs, apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes." you can say this all you want like some mantra but that doesn't explain how it happened. it's very silly. You still haven't told me how it happened. no one can because missing links are called missing links for a reason. they're missing. actually there are none. lol you wont find any.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Species that possess transitional features and are not missing: Epidexipteryx hui, Protoavis, Protarchaeopteryx, Archeopteryx, Avimimus, Sinosauropteryx, Caudipteryx, Rahonavis, Shuvuuia, Sinornithosaurus, Beipiasaurus, Microraptor, Nomingia, Tiktaalik, Epidendrosaurus, Cryptovolans, Scansoriopteryx, Yixianosaurus, Dilong, Pedopenna, Jinfengopteryx, Sinocalliopteryx, Sinornis, Ambiortus, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz actually I'm wrong there were birds but that's still no problem and Noah was smart don't tell me he brought big animals on the ark, he probably brought babies. Also, don't go and say I wasn't there so I don't know because that's crap and you know it. you have way more to prove than I do. we have a book that told us what happened and a world of proof. the world is covered in mostly water. That's where the water went LMAO
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Which fish lived, the freshwater fish who got washed into the ocean or the saltwater fish in the freshwater rain?
So baby kangaroos hopped to Australia and all the marsupials did too just by chance?
And you are missing 29,029 feet of water.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz silly man you're assuming that all of the water was salt water back then. it wasn't
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz well we both know it didn't happen by chance or natural selection. (by the way, what is the thing that is selecting? even if this thing selects, it isn't creating anything new.) so if both of these don't explain evolution I'd love to hear how it happened because I won't know until someone tells me.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz "they can't make themselves" Of course, NOTHING makes itself. A watch is just a simple man-made example which illustrates this principle and a watch is nothing in compared to what God has made.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible ''NOTHING makes itself.'' Wrong, life makes life.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Life makes life? You sound like a creationist.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera Yes life makes life, it has ever since it started 4 billion years ago.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz And what started the whole process?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera The forces of nature, in this case mostly the electro-magnetic force.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz I meant what initially started the whole universe, before natural forces came into existence. Sorry for the question being a little vague.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera God made the universe. It expanded, cooled and everything evolved into what you see today. Do you have a problem with that?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz So you disagree with the biblical account of creation as recorded in Genesis 1? Or do you think that it is compatible with evolutionary theory? (I'm just trying to understand where you're coming from.)
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera Read the first page of the bible and tell me it was not written by men who thought the earth was flat and the center of everything. The earth was never 'without form'' or ''void''
The universe is 13.7 billion years old, does that match the bible?
Does the bible explain why we are primates?
Does the bible say the kangaroos hopped to Australia from Turkey but no where else?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz So in essence, you believe God created everything but you have no idea who He is? Would I be right in that assumption?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera I know God is not a ''He''. God does not have or need a penis.
Why do you think you know who God is? Do you think sheep herders 2000 years ago had the right idea?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Nice abstract claim. Now where is your support for it? How do you KNOW God is not a He? Have fun proving that, especially with science.
By the way, this seems to be an argument you like to use time and time again: how much evidence would it take for you to realize that God is a He? (Note the biased implication of the question)
Prophecy alone speaks to the Bible's credibility. Check it out sometime, or do you already have some escape plan to rationalize that truth in your mind as well?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera GOD IS A GOD NOT A PERSON THAT HAS SEX.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Hahaha, wow. Do you always make up spontaneous and unrelated arguments? When did I make any such assertion? Please stay on topic and quit trying to shift the focus off of yourself because you have no valid answer.
But yes, God does have a throne in heaven as mentioned in Psalm 45:6, 47:8, Hebrews 1:8 and numerous other places in scripture.
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera My God is everywhere, He does not need to sit down.
Your God didn't even have a heaven 6000 years ago.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Lol. I would agree your god does not need to sit down, because he does not exist. What kind of god would use death, trial and error, and take millions of years to get something worthwhile to come into existence. Your god sounds pretty dumb.
The one true God spoke the universe into being and did it right the first time.
"Your God didn't even have a heaven 6000 years ago." So are you saying that my God does in fact exist, but does not have a heaven in which He dwells?
krownzera 2 months ago
@gregrutz Oh by the way, I just noticed your comment to KJB which says, "I don't know what God said, he is supernatural. Hint, he does not talk to people."
Yet earlier, you said to me that God is not a He. Way to contradict yourself, which one is it?
krownzera 2 months ago
@krownzera If you think god needs a penis and sits in a chair in the sky then you need help.
gregrutz 2 months ago
Trilobites are a well-known fossil group of extinct marine arthropods that form the class Trilobita. The first appearance of trilobites in the fossil record defines the base of the Atdabanian stage of the Early Cambrian period (526 million years ago), and they flourished throughout the lower Paleozoic era before beginning a drawn-out decline to extinction when, during the Devonian, almost all trilobite orders, with the sole exception of Proetida, died out. Any questions?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz trilobite fossils are found WITH human footprints as well as dinosaurs.
If you search you can find many examples. All those periods are just made up to make you think the earth is millions of years old, it's not. The long names are given to to "impress", it doesn't. The story of what happened regarding them is made up, just like a fairy tale, which what it is.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible No, trilobites lived in the ocean. How did man leave footprints on the sea floor?
Do you think scientists just make shit up? The don't give grants to do that.
The earth is million of years old, 4,545 million years old.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz After the flood of Noah men were walking around the earth, if you believe the Bible (I do) a footprint with a trilobyte could easily have been made... MANY times and that's just ONE way. Grants are given ONLY for so-called proof of evolution. If any of the white robed cult brings in evidence for creation that can not be SPUN to make it appear like evolution, it's discarded. You mean you don't know this? tsk tsk and you probably think only the financial world is corrupt?
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible Trilobites live in the ocean, you are not going to find human footprints with them. Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, you won't find humans prints with then either.
How can scientists show evidence for creation? There is none. Which creation story do you mean?
There is no cult pushing evolution.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "There is no cult pushing evolution" Where have you been? The Roman Catholic church ONLY in recent years (last 50 or so) started pushing evolution. It's part of the "official" doctrine with a SPIN on it allowing for God to be the one who started it. It's STILL EVOLUTION and a clear rejection of what God said and HOW he made everything.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
They were washed out. Most of the fish died. Now only the ones that do it right are left. Evolution !
gregrutz 2 months ago
I am so sorry for the people that consider that there is no creator or creators. I am sure that there could be one or many designers. For those who believe that there is no designer behind the creation of nature i suggest to check the definition of AXIOM.In traditional logic, an axiom or postulate is a proposition that is not proven or demonstrated but considered to be either self-evident, or subject to necessary decision. People and all are created by a force. And that is an Axiom.
themhz 6 months ago
The concurrence of the conclusions of ALL the apropriate fields of study, make evolution as solid a theory as gravity or electro-magnetism.
tallliza 6 months ago
@tallliza What I see from your comment is basically "you can only be qualified if you believe in evolution because that' what smart people do." "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" Romans 1:22
AmmerBros 4 months ago
Remember that there were only two of these fish from the beginning. Genius, absolutely genius, programming and coding to keep these fish alive and prosperous. The more we study science, the closer we get to see intelligent design, and further away we get from evolution.
PirateXzibit 7 months ago
@PirateXzibit You are living in a bubble of fantasy and wishful thinking.
tallliza 6 months ago
The fact that alot of animals have eyes, and other organs, and human as well, doesn't mean that we are somehow related. It means that we have a common designer. We all live on the same planet, with the same light from the sun, why would everything be different if the first design was perfect from the beginning? I haven't met atheists who look at things at a wider perspective, they only settle for the first best thing that's comforting for them.
PirateXzibit 7 months ago
@PirateXzibit Study the constrcution of the human eye. It`s an excellent piece of evidence for evolution. NO intelligent being would put the eye together like it is.
tallliza 6 months ago
@tallliza I've heard this one before, "the lens is in the wrong spot, octopi have better eyes." wel its quite obvious to me that we don't live in water so we are in direct contact with the sun. UV rays, X rays. we're open to it. it would only be smart for a designer to protect or eyes. Octopi live in the water, and water blocks those rays. you can trade your eyes for an octopus's eyes, if you want to burn them out.
AmmerBros 4 months ago
Spectacular video. Hallucinatory evolutionists will pull their hair out.
warriorspikes51 1 year ago
Yeah, that was a good video.
tallswede68 2 years ago
Daniel...I can't help but feel sorry for anyone who promotes such NONSENSE. What makes you so sure that your undestanding is correct or CONFIRMED ! You have NO PROOF and yet you promote this with NO CONFIRMATION ! How can you say your ideals according to God are right and the other religions are wrong ? This video is dated ..similar to the bible as it's beginning to sound silly as the years pass and evolution becomes more known...What about DNA ? How come it shows are relationship with Apes?
TheBoopski 2 years ago
The fact that this video is old is on PURPOSE. Science that is good stays good. As far as DNA goes, it's so complicated that only Intelligence could have put it together. Evolution suggests that IT (evolution) IS that "intelligence"
I've even heard evolutionists says phrases as follows:
* As evolution dictates
* According to evolution
* As we expect from evolution
Phrases like this "imply loosly" that evolution ITSELF is THE intelligence. Thus they take away what belongs to God.
KingJamesBible 2 years ago
@KingJamesBible Does a rock know which way to fall? It must be intelligent. Did it take that away from God?
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz all of these arguments against God have to assume God in the first place. it's like denying the existence of oxygen. you have to take a breath in to even say anything like "I can't see oxygen so it doesn't exist"
AmmerBros 4 months ago
@gregrutz and yes. Gravity is a force you can't explain. rocks fall down. why? because maybe there is an order to everything.
AmmerBros 4 months ago
@AmmerBros Why? Rocks fall because of the force of Gravity, not ''order'' or ''intelligents''.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz why is gravity always working? how do you know you can always trust it? you have to have faith. it's just like you don't look at a building and wonder if there is a builder, you don't look at a painting and wonder if there is a painter. In the same respect you don't look at creation and wonder "hmmm did someone make this?" the reason evolution was made up was, people didn't like god's rules. Get rid of God, you can do whatever you want. after all, your just an ape.
AmmerBros 4 months ago
@AmmerBros Wrong, Gravity will work tomarrow if I have faith or not.
Evolution has nothing to do with God's rules, Most biologists accept God, they all accept Evolution.
Humans are Primates, fact, what was your point?
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz you can't even know that for sure. the same as you can't know if the Earth was billions of years old because, there is no proof, (actually much proof against it) humans and primates have a 95% similarity. now that seems very close but guess what, every percent has a 48,000,000 nucleotide difference, and a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal for any animal? let me know how this happened by chance.
AmmerBros 4 months ago
@AmmerBros There is a mountain of proof the earth is old. Geology and Plate Techtonic proves it.
Chimps are closer to humans than they are gorillas. 95% the same means mostly the same.
''let me know how this happened by chance'' No one says it happens by chance except creatards.
Darwin wrote, ''Origin of Species by means of Natural Selcection'' Not by means of chance.
gregrutz 3 months ago
@gregrutz lol this makes me laugh. Natural selection is not a creative force. it selects. its like quality contol. it doesnt create anything new, it makes sure nothing is bad. you wont get a flat screen tv by making sure a cell phone works.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros There is more to evolution than natural selection, why can't creationists see the big picture?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Because it's quite simple. Science are things we can observe test and demonstrate. Evolution can't be observed. no one has ever seen it happen, it can't be tested. trust me people have tried. and no one can demonstrate it. evolution is Religious and non scientific.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Evolution has been observed in the lab and in nature. It is tested every day by creatards and hasn't been proven wrong. Science does not use the supernatural so Biology is not a religion.
Scientists don't do ID so it is not science.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz seriously. lol it amazes me how people believe in such an insane theory. No one has EVER seen a dog produce anything but a dog. yet, most of the world believes it must have happened. it blows my mind. its like saying "man I have this watch, and I can't see who made it so it must have made itself." that statement is silly. you don't look at creation and wonder if someone made it. its so impossble for this world to happen by itself. People only believe it because it removes God.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Same KIND, Yes. Dogs make dogs, apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes, still mammals, still vertebrates and still animals. You can't outgrow your ancestry.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz also, you say that evolution isn't by chance, well then you must be a Creationist because there are really only two options. Either it happened by chance or it was intentional. There are no other options. so you said "Evolution doesn't happen by chance." you are saying that it was intentional, which implies and intelligence. Man, you're a creationist!
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Why can't creationists see the forces of nature. Does a rock need intelligence to know which way to fall? Does an atom need to be told what other atoms it can interact with?
And yes there is a lot of chance involved, learn about quantum mechanics and you will see the whole universe is run by chance.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz wasn't it you who said "a watch isn't alive"? well hello a rock isn't alive. it doesn't know anything. but it never falls up. Everyone knows that mount rushmore was created, but you will probably say that george washington and his 10 trillion cells happened by chance. btw you are basically saying that nature is the intelligence. where did it get that from? and you'll say nowhere. I'm sorry, this is ludicrous. absolutely impossible for any of this to get here on it's own.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz use evolution to answer the 4 basic questions of life.
1. Who am I? (what am I worth?)
2. Where did I come from?
3. What's my purpose?
4. Where am I going when I die?
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz By the way, what do you have to prove? NOTHING. If you are right, then heck, I lived a good life and I get turned into a plant or a butterfly or whatever. but crap, if I'm right, you got a real problem on your hands.
There are only two possibilities, there either is a God or there isn't.
look man, God loves you. You are a big deal to him.
but you don't want him, all you're trying to prove is, there is no purpose, and we go nowhere when we die. That's so depressing.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros I never said anything about God. Why do you bring her up?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz lol that's funny. haha good one. I brought God up because he is the most important and evolution tries to get rid of him. Of course you wouldn't bring him up. I'm sure you feel very uncomfortable with me talking about God. Well, guess what, he's my savior and I will talk about him and bring him up till the cows come home, and NOTHING can't be explained without him. that's why.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros ''evolution tries to get rid of him''' Evolution says nothing about God, sorry if it does not fit some of your religious stories.
Evolution just follows the forces of nature set up by the creator.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz I think it's funny how you assume you can relate what evolution says about the world to what the Bible clearly teaches. Evolution says the present is the key to the past. The Bible does not say that. According to the Bible the world was alot different. So if you want to have a valid argument about me, you might want to get your facts straight about what creation actually teaches.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@gregrutz I think it's funny how you think you can relate what evolution says about the world to what the Bible clearly teaches. Evolution says the present is the key to the past. The bible says the past is the key to the present. So when you try to take what you see in the world today and disprove the bible, you are making a "straw-man" argument. If you want to disprove the bible, get your facts straight.
AmmerBros 2 months ago
@AmmerBros Galileo proved the bible wrong hundreds of years ago.
The men who wrote the bible thought the earth was flat.
Isaiah 40 : 22-24
“He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers.”
I can draw a circle on a flat piece of paper, they are 2D. FLAT.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz ......you see fossils of monkeys......... you see fossils of Humans......... where are the fossils of stages in between? ..........evolution disproved.
kyleberryvideos 2 months ago
@kyleberryvideos Research some of these fossils: Eosimias sinensis, the Aegyptopithecus zeuxis, Proconsul africanus, Afropithecus turkanensis, Turkanapithecus kalakolensis, Sivapithecus indicus, hecus bambolii, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus bahrelghazali, lopithecus africanus, Paranthropus aethiopicus, Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis
gregrutz 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible Why can't creationists see the forces of nature? A rock know which way to fall. Is it
''itself... THE intelligence.'??? ''According to gravity'' it falls.
gregrutz 3 months ago
@gregrutz The rock goes AS the law of gravity dictates. God setup the law. Scientist don't even know what gravity is, they only know it works.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible And all of nature follows the laws set up by God, and those laws produced all the life on earth that evolved,
gregrutz 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible '' * As we expect from evolution'' And if everything didn't go ''according to evolution'' it would be proven wrong. But everthing fits.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "But everthing fits." Does it? Question for you -
The overall premise of evolution is we (humans) are getting better. Agree? or disagree? explain only if you disagree.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible Disagree. Are we evolveing to be better what? At swimming? At jumping? Better at surviving is all that evolution does. Survival of the fittest really means most things die. Most of the species that ever lived on the earth ARE extinct: No dinosaurs, sabertooth tigers, neaderthal man, trilobites, etc.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz How do you know "most" species" that ever lived are gone? Have you seen them? Counted them? Compared this number (which you don't have) with how many "species" today?? I know you're just talking out of your hat. You are just mimicking an "evolution mantra" there are trilobites still around TODAY and neanderthal man was proven a COMPLETE HOAX years ago. Dinosaur means terrible lizrard. We still have lizards TODAY, just smaller due to the change of condition from Noah's flood.
KingJamesBible 2 months ago
@KingJamesBible It is called the fossil record. That is what we are trying to explain. You just deny it. Yes they count them, 30,000 species of dinosaurs. Yes dinos are lizards just like humans are mammals.
Neaderthal DNA proves we did not evolve from them, happy now. They were a different kind of human. There were 2 or more kinds of humans on the earth at one time. Yes we still have fish and lizards and trilobites today, does that mean something to you?
gregrutz 2 months ago
All things..dogs cats..apes..all have similar design. All with DNA blueprints. In other words, made by the same God. What's so hard about that?
dsfpierce 2 years ago
@TheBoopski @6.20~6.24min/sec's, my favorite, the bat with on board radar.
+ when theres 100's of them flying together they must also have to regulate frequency or may be they were designed with custom pitch?. Either way the on board CPU is very clever to control flight , multi scan-multi surfaces at speed, remember to eat , find a partner .... . Its amazing to me that any could think it might happen by chance. "The Jesus factor" makes a lot of sense though. Jesus knows your frequency Boop's.
zacqt 1 year ago
@TheBoopski apes are 95% similar to humans yeah that sounds real close but when you get right down to it, that's a 48,000,000 nucleotide difference for each percent! guess what. a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal for ANY animal. you mean to tell me that this all happened by chance? please. don't be silly. what you said is like saying "man Oxygen is dated, we don't need it anymore. let's make something else up" When you need it to SURVIVE. just as you need God. and he loves you immensely.
AmmerBros 4 months ago
@AmmerBros it always amazes me how a BELIEVER such as yourself can trample over facts as if you know(not guess) that your right and the worlds "Most Intelligent" scientist are wrong in regards to Evolution and common decent of man. Ever hear of Endogenous retrovirus(ERVs), Fused chromosome #2, Neanderthal DNA compared to our DNA and of course SUMMATION ? You have NO IDEAL how those things alone show who we are and where we came from. Quit living and promoting the "FAIRYTALE" it's outright lying!
TheBoopski 4 months ago
@AmmerBros you might want to research a few more things that solidify EVOLUTION and proof that the GOD of the bible is completely made up. Biblical scholarship can show you that for starts. But as to proving evolution--> LOOK INTO : Embryology~Comparative anatomy~genetics~Molecular biology and Paleintology. Then to verify what I said according to THE KING JAMES BIBLE..."The bible chronology" which says according to the bible that the EARTH can only be 6000 years old ! Does that makes sense ?
TheBoopski 4 months ago
Excellent video!
husky394xp 2 years ago