Added: 4 years ago
From: LoserOM09
Views: 76,718
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (135)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love my iroc-z

  • @StratoBlaster420

    i love my rs

  • @jessehernandez12345 3rd gens for life!!

  • WOW!!!!! OWO OWO

  • knight rider love forever!

  • Cool

  • i thought the knight rider car was a t top .

  • I think the Trans Am used for KITT has a higher clearance at the front and pack (or no skirts), so there's less chance of scrapping as the Trans Am goes up the ramp?

  • @Tigadee00 i think your right about that 3rd gens sit pretty low i would think they would bottem out bad

  • I have a 1988 Camaro iroc-z convertible with the 305 and 5 speed tranny. wonder just how much more difficult it would be to get up that ramp as soon as back tires hit. Not that i would try it personally, but i think it would be a little more challenging.

  • <---- proud owner of a 92 camaro rs 25th anniversary eddition 5 speed :)

  • They did the experiment on a wet ramp, Had they done it on a dry ramp, I suspect the drivetrain would have blown out from going from 55mph to maybe 2mph really fast. Just a theory.

  • this is just stupid. They did drive it up in the show, it was no trick.... stupid...

  • @TheNewVideos the only thing they could do in the tv-series is to take the ramp in slower speed and reduce the amount of frames per second making it look like 60mph while they in fact are driving in maybe 25-30mph, well mostly to the fact that it's costly for the movie/film company to have stuntdrivers if the actors want to make their own stunts...but this just confirms that the "myth" it's something you can do irl :D

  • @TheChill0ut why would they need to fake the ramp experiment? Guess somebody needs to brush up on his physics. It's a perfectly safe stunt if the driver is moderately skilled. As long as you can keep the car at speed and the steering precise, there is no need for stunt drivers or doctoring the film. Plus going slower is harder to keep things aligned.

  • @UnderManlac yeah but it costs more if the star of the movie gets hurt due to driving of the ramp full speed than it would be if he/she drove in less speed, and also didn't they point out that you could do it in less speed?..btw didn't say they faked the ramp experiment, but that in movies they make it less of a reality. So no need to brush up on things :D

  • @TheChill0ut The point is, the car has inertia at the speed it is going. The truck is moving at a slightly slower speed. The mass of the car keeps the car moving at that inertia, which is nearly matched by the truck.

    Sure they could have filmed the sequence at a slower speed, but it isn't necessary. As long as you can aim a car at a ramp and keep the speeds constant, then there is little danger at full speed as to slower speeds. Maybe they're going 40 instead of 55.

  • @UnderManlac yeah i never really talked about this experiment...what i meant was in the movies aka hollywood films not this experiment wich is clearly doable...but in the movies they never risk anything...well they have to match the same speed as the truck not to fall of in the inertia (when the tires hit the ramp) but then after they can slow down cause of the effect it has due to acceleration upwards from the ramp they will reach a speed of 55 going up but then they can...

  • @TheChill0ut ...slow down to 40 while on the ramp...sorry ran out of signs...loves and hugs all around

  • @TheChill0ut The car can't accelerate up the ramp when the driving wheels land on it, unless the driver hits the accelerator. The laws of inertia don't allow for instant acceleration. In fact, one would likely have to push further down on the accelerator to bring the car up the ramp due to the weight of the car on the incline. Inertia will carry the car's momentum along only so far. There is no need to slow the car down while on the ramp. The car can't reach 55mpg on that short ramp.

  • @TheChill0ut Mythbusters proved it. In both experiments (model and real), the car maintained it's throttle position and was able to crawl up the ramp and park in the back of the truck with no danger. While going up the ramp, the car slowed down because it's inertia was maintained throughout. Now on a static ramp/truck, the car would shoot up the ramp at a little less than it approached it. While both vehicles are in motion, inertia will keep them at the same speed.

  • @UnderManlac Still ain't talking about this proved myth...i were still talking about how they do in the movies when the actors decide to make their own stunts...and still NOT about when they made this on mythbusters...because you're so cute i give you 10/10 though

  • LOL. I also find it interesting to note they used a similar year/generation of a camaro, i.e., mid 80's, because the Camaro is the sister car to the Firebird Trans Am.

  • Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

  • @TheGovinda777 The physics are exactly the same. The effect would be identical with either drive configuration. The only difference would be how the FWD components would react. Being that you are dealing with a horizontally opposed engine the torque now being in-line with engine rotation would stress the engine mounts considerably! Have you ever noticed that FWD cars are the ones with mount problems? There's a reason!

  • @johneastmond Thank you for clarifying this. Though somehow I feel a FWD car would likely lurch somewhat upon contact with the ramp while the rear wheels freewheel. Does that seem logical? I mean in a RWD he can maintain the same accelerator pedal pressure till the last of the rear wheels make it up, whereas a more skilled driver would likely be required for much more precise accelation control to prevent the front drive wheels from pulling it way too hard up the ramp.

  • @TheGovinda777 Yeah, you'd feel more of a lurch than with a rear wheel drive. The physics of rotational momentum of the engine and trans-axle would want to cause the drive train to buck around in the hood quite a bit! But the whole bit of the car rocketing up the ramp at some ungodly speed is junk! Not going to happen w/ either drive configuration.

  • @TheGovinda777 The same laws of inertia apply to a FWD as it does to a RWD car going up the ramp. Your idea would only happen if the car had no inertia thus instant acceleration could occur, but not on any object with mass. You forget physics do you?

  • @UnderManlac No, but I would have thought the gearing would interfere significantly not allowing it to freewheel well.

  • @TheGovinda777 I can't see that front wheel drive and rear wheel drive would make any difference. If the car was fwd, then the rear wheels will freewheel, and the front wheels will pull the car up the ramp. In a rwd car, the rear wheels will push the car up the ramp, the front wheels freewheel.

    The two vehicles are nearly at the same speed and inertia will keep it that way. The car can't instantly shoot up the ramp, it will maintain it's inertia.

  • I mean, think about it, the physics concept they used works great because the rear wheels are spinning at the same speed as the road below. Now, if you attempted this with a FWD car, it would likely lurch up the ramp WAY too fast and lose control/traction upon first contact, while the rear wheels spin at the same speed as the road below.

  • I think they failed to explain such a stunt is likely impossible with front wheel drive.

  • @TheGovinda777 it would be just as easy for front weal drive even easer i would have to say the 4X4 would be intresting to try tho and an AWD that is differint than a 4X4

  • you know im pretty sure that a british film and director did this for real way back in the early 70s....three times actually...was in a little known film called the italian job?

  • He heats a right mirror at 4:12

  • i want that camaro

  • i'm pretty sure the night rider was a firebird

  • same car

  • @judd204 whats the differance?

  • dont forget this tunt was in the italian job

  • wow it started raining in oregon!!??? WTF mate

  • mustangs suck balls

  • never doubt the HOFF

  • SWEET!!!!!!!

  • Were people actually thinking the car was to rocket into the trailer at 55mph!!! Where's the energy to come from? "...not really hit much on the car..boo..BOOM! It does a little bit."

  • proud to own a 68' camaro convertable

    wouldn't mind owning a 3rd gen as well

  • proud to own a 3rd gen. camaro

  • @rider205  me too!

  • Fuck all you haters, just b/c your fuckin fords and imports suck balls and you know it. Camaro's kick the shit out of anything in your fucking driveway pussies.

  • yeah seriously Camaros are off the chain i drive a 2010 SS2 and its freakin amazing

  • its called a 2ss not a ss2

  • I love camaros and own a 94 z28, cammed, header, high flow cat, x piped exhaust and i want you to know

    YOU SOUND LIKE A TARD

  • just shut the fuck up, like that shit you got on your Z is anything to brag about, you're the one that sounds like a retard. didn't ask for your opinion you dipshit, so next time you feel like writing something, do everybody a favor and DON'T.

  • queeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer­

  • go choke on a dick you little faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggg

  • uhhh oh i got a video of my boy doin a burnout in his iroc wat wat!! lol whos the faggggggg?

  • You're the fag you little cocksucker, its an RS, MY RS with enough motor to stomp your dad's crotch rocket. damn you little bitch punks piss me off with your dumbfuck comments. when your balls drop and you act like a man then post something worth reading. until then you can take the cars and bikes you didn't buy or earn and shove em up your snatch you fucking cunt.

  • ok first off its MINE paid for it myself and i have a car so id say im doin pretty well of myself.. second i dont give a fuck what your dad does to his RS unless he has 1500 whp hes not beating me..and besides that IT DOESNT HAHAHA YOU LOSE!!!!

  • I bet you still live with your parents haha Stop trying to act like a man when you're still a little bitch. And give me a break i've seen cars with half that horsepower smash little crotch rockets like yours, hell i bet the old small block i had could crush your little bicycle. I bet i can trounce your shit on street tires, a hyabusa on spray was the only bike i've raced that i'll give props to. And your shit ain't got shit on a 'busa much less my RS.

  • lol lets see some videos then buddy and unless its running 95 or under good luck buddy..im done wit you goodbye :)

  • haha typical fanboy, and whats worse is you're actually proud that your bike does 9.5's, thats pathetic for a bike. Simply pathetic.

  • and you RS runs 8's riiiight? hahahahahahaha this guy is TOTAL BULL FUCKING SHIT!! go fuck yourself dusche your nothing but talk and everyone who reads this is going to laugh at you because of your stupidity. once again go fuck yourself untill you have some videos then post them.. ill watch and laugh while you once again go fuck yourself :P haha faggottt im serious tho i wanna see a video of your 10 second camaro with 900 hp :) send it to me

  • after i spray it yeah i wouldn't doubt if it can break an 8. why would i fuck myself when i got your mom huh? if you wana watch then you're more than welcome to watch and laugh. probably wouldn't be the first time haha. kid you gotta grow up, and when 'everyone' reads this they'll just laugh at your pathetic piss poor shit. why post videos? when i trailer it up to phnx, bring your lawn mower and we'll do it up at firebird raceway

  • spray? lol ill put a 50 shot on just for you buddy and you can meet me at famoso. sayyyy $1000?

  • is that right? haha goddamn you dumbfuck fanboys are hilariously stupid dipshits. $1000??? Thats it?? It would cost me that in C16, a tune, and trailering it up there and back you retarded fuck. haha just shut the fuck up already, you're embarrassing yourself. bye. haha

  • lol doog luck wit that budddd

  • @roperez1 Internet fags. You're the stupid one, you cant even capitalize words. Fag.

  • do some research, camaro was one of the best cars of its time.

  • They did this a long time ago in the Gumball Rally with the Ferrari.

  • You obvisally know fuck all about cars then

  • He Knocked the mirror poor Camaro

  • WOW i cant believe this worked, well i can but cool anyway. These guys are nuts.

  • i wanna do that on the road lol

  • if you look on the 55 test he knocks off the left mirror......

  • I saw that lol

  • Sure does! LoL

  • i wish i had a comaro like that body style, i think its more than possible

  • Bad ass! Didn't know the Myth did a short on this one!? Cool!! It as also confirmed! Not that I would chance it but its kinda cool to see them try it themselves..Lol :)

  • 305 V8 Hands down. It was pretty neglected and hammered when i got it, but properly tuned it FLEW

  • I've owned a 1990 Camaro RS 305 V8 and '90 Camaro RS 3.1V6, and LOVE this video. Bad ass ride!

  • which 1 of those camaros is faster???

  • You're joking right?

  • yea i was just joking i own three camaros my self.

  • i have a 91 camaro ...and i love the stunt they just did...its soo cool..

  • Could you still get up the ramp with a FWD car?

  • Yep ^^

    Inertia will slow down the velocity.. lalalal

  • they did this on fear factor as a stunt

  • take a look again !! it's a camaro

  • haha daft fool its a maro

  • "please sir, provide facts and figures. By this stage pontiac no longer made its own engines and used chevrolet ones. That combined with the car ALWAYS being heavier makes it slower.."

    Who the hell cares if the 80's t/a was a tad slower than a camaro? The LS1's were faster on T/A's. Guess they finally got it right, hey? Besides, the last camaros were butt-ugly with that stupid front end, while the T/A's were gorgeous.

  • lol, actually LS1 TA's were slower than stripper Z/28's and base formulas. The extra weight and extra drag (if it had the ram air hood) see to that.

  • ... too bad LS1's weren't in the 80's.

  • yea, but at least we had the LT1's

  • not in the 80s asshole.

  • no camaros were harmed in the filming of this myth busters, thank god. i have a 89 rs just like that one and i love it.

  • 84 z28 XD

  • 86 z28 :D

  • camaros are not good cars in the rain.. but i love them

  • yeah...I think they suck. Well, I did. Now I like them...extremely. they are hot cars. I just love Pontiac Trans Ams even more.

  • yeah, never even think about a glass of water in those! lol

  • CAMAROS ROCK!

  • lame, this stunts be around forever.

  • Yeah,but can he do that with 34 pounds of hair on his head???? DH could!

  • contestants had to pull this stunt on fear factor? and this was WAY b4 mythbusters? Why doubt?

  • 4:14 he smashes the miror on the side of the truck when he goes in lol

  • at the start you can see a massive dent in the side headlight poor camaro

  • why not use a trans am?

    why use the camaro?

  • your a fag

  • there pretty must the same car

  • wow....you totally are wrong. read up on cars stupid. Trans Am and Camaros kick ass. trans Ams rule and the IROC Z are great as well. and you sir are a faggot. you know nothing about cars. and driven by rednecks? dude are you stupid? Yes.....you are.

  • please sir, provide facts and figures. By this stage pontiac no longer made its own engines and used chevrolet ones. That combined with the car ALWAYS being heavier makes it slower..

    My Z28: 2800 pounds

    My friends Trans am: 3400 pounds

    Same engine, he is slower.

  • Oh feel free to tell me how the brakes make a car faster, or should i just take your word for it? We've already established it develops the same power and the trans am has more weight. Same tires, pretty much the same car otherwise.

  • well the brakes obviously do not. but rusted brake DO slow DOWN a car, but not speed it up. either way, they are two awsome fast cars that both kick ass. Trans Am is just cooler. other than that then yeah it is KIND OF the same. please actually understand. youre right it has the same power and trans am has a little more weight, but trans am has more of other things like turbocharger. other than that, they are the same.

  • yea go IROCZ! I love mine

  • Woah woah woah, were all on the same side here. I love my 81 Camaro, and I love the Trans Am. I've gotten more than one part for my Camaro from a Trans Am in the Junkyards, and I got friends who own a Trans Am get more than one part from a Camaro in the junkyard. Why can't we all bang on rice burners, or fords, or even worse RICE BURNERS o.0

  • umm when did you comment?? but yes agreed but why do so many people like ford cars????

  • I commented last night. I don't know why people like ford's so much after all they (F)ail (O)n (R)ace (D)ay. So you own a 77 Trans Am?

  • 4 seats and a board and were call it a Ford. Not a big fan on them either.

  • well it could have been a TBI 5.0L. ha ha.

  • lol, I like the V-8 sound of the RS V-6 hahaha

  • they made V8 RS camaros

  • ever notice it almost always starts to rain when they do the outdoor stuff *lol*

  • Jamie and Adam started off in Hollywood making contraptions for Hollywood stunts and stuff.

  • yeah, like couple ten years in there

  • First to comment :)

    GOOD STUNT! now they can go to hollywood as stunts...

    errrr maybe not, keep with miths mithbusters!

    Thx for the uploading

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more