this is a fail because it would take twice as long to recharge the 12 volt batery from 24 v dc output in fact as soon as you hook this up to a charger you would loose the charge much quicker than you could put it back in
i also think that frequency generated would lead to more interesting stuff regarding this machine. do you know of ed leedskalnin? i'm assuming you do. why not try using it for antigrav?
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $30 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 15 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly about $10 000.
What about Watts? Watts = actual power used or created. Also, higher volts = lower amps. Calculate wattage output from the batteries and wattage output from the generator. This will give you real numbers to judge the efficiency of your contraption. I like to see these tinkerings. But what impresses me most is the numbers. Without the numbers, nothing else matters. Keep going!
@futurevent you'd have to account for reactance in that equation as well. motors require power factor correction as the voltage and current are out of phase due to the reactance. build a transformer instead i reckon. nice engineering though.
unix001: Yep.. Without a load or some way to measure wattage in VS out, you might as well just save all the moving parts and try a common day invention called a Transformer. They have them as close as 98-99% efficient.. Can't really beat that..
I can make 1V go to a 1000V with a load of transformers. What we need to know is the power output vs power input, which is measured in Watts. You multiply the voltage by the current to determine the wattage. If you can prove the Pout is > Pin, you've solved the energy crisis.
I like how you do the "I'm on the frontier of science!" thing to rationalize what is ultimately pseudo-science, and then say "have a great life" to close the door on the issue. Nice.
Go back to your original post about atom bombs and nuclear power plants:
"Both produce more energy then we put in. "
It's plain false. We put IN radioactive elements, and OUT comes the energy in heat form. Nothing is gained or lost. It's simply a conversion. Of course you know that. So why do you insist on using the term "over unity" in the most misleading way possible, as do all the "free energy" scammers? Have you something to sell us?
i understand that you are all talking about amps and ohms, i am on a new trigger system which is on my other video and i will soon be connecting a load to it...................thanks for watching
You can put 110 volts into a Tesla coil and get hundreds of thousands of volts out (or more). That doesn't mean anything. How many amperes do you put in vs. what you get out? If you draw a load off the output, does it slow down or stop the wheel? The biggest problem with most "perpetual" designs is that if you try to draw power off of it, it fails.
It's good to explore new engineering designs and try new things, but let's be serious: Over-unity energy is not a physical reality as we understand the laws of the universe.
In fact it is possible, and it is used too, and every person on earth knows about it. The atomic bomb is an over unity device, and a nuclear power plant is also an over unity device.
Both produce more energy then we put in.
The solution to get over unity is a chain reaction. The concept works, is proven, and is used every single day by hundreds of millions of people all over the planet. Even Albert Einstein did admit that it was possible during the Manhattan project.
If your definition of an "over unity device" is anything which gives us more energy than we put in, then guess what else qualifies as "over unity"? Gasoline, flatbread pizzas, and horses.
Your implication that atom bombs and nuclear power plants extract magical amounts of energy is ignorant and/or mis-informed. There is a finite amount of energy in the nuclear forces, and no amount of daisy-chaining will allow for perpetual energy.
And better do some research about a chain reaction. Nobody, including me, said something about infinite energy. The discussion was about getting more energy out then you put in, even if that is only for a short period of time. With a nuclear power plant it is just that what they do. You can jump high and low, and say whatever you want. The truth is that over unity does exist.
Yes Albert Einstein did admit, otherwise they could not make a nuclear bomb. Albert Einstein first didn't think it was possible, but he was convinced at an older age by one of his colleagues or former students or whatever.
Your implication is that Albert Einstein was a fan of goofy basement machines people build to get energy from nothing. That implies he did not understand thermodynamics. :/
You don't read what I say, you just have a big plate in front of your head. I do not claim that energy is made out of nothing because that is simply not possible. Energy can't be PRODUCED, it can only change forms. But it is possible to collect more enrgy then the energy that is used to pwer a device that is collecting energy. And I never mentioned anything about perpetual motion. You keep coming with that BS argument. I am the last person on earth that will say that perpetual motion is possible
I wonder how many of your comrades here on YouTube and in the "perpetual motion" hobby group would agree with your definition of "over unity"? It seems pretty apparent to me that most of them are on a quest for a device which creates magical energy from nothing.
Then you should avoid using the phrase "over unity, a term most often used (and interpreted) as a synonym for "free energy", "perpetual motion", and in general pseudo-science.
Now if you want to play word games and try to re-define "over unity" beyond the common interpretation, that's fine, but don't expect people to magically understand that you've change it, just as it would be silly for me to claim I found a unicorn and then later reveal that my definition of "unicorn" is "white horse".
It is your problem, because my interpretation is the interpretation of the majority. If you're on a mission to re-define something, you should make it clear that's what you're doing instead of acting offended when someone suddenly realizes you've changed all the definitions from what most people understand them to be.
That's a poor analogy, because facts are independent from the majority's understanding of them, while the definitions of words (being nothing more than a communication tool) really are influenced and controlled by the majority.
Do you even know what you're talking about? It seems like you're backpedaling. Do you even realize that the phrase "over unity" is to "perpetual motion" just as "intelligent design" is to "creationism"? It's just a sly shift in vocabulary. The pseudoscience is the same.
You have chosen the name Darwin and yet you refuse to accept new science and discoveries and technologies. That is your choice, I do not have a problem with that. Just believe what you want to believe and what you are able to understand, and then everything is OK. If that makes you happy then it's fine with me.
There is no need to try to convince me to stick to the old information like you prefer to do, I do much rather look at new discoveries and new technologies.
if u want to die make a fuel saving device and refuse to sell it to the oil companies.of course overunity is possible.the oil companies control the goverment and universities.the oil companies should be charged with treason and we can start with standard oil for selling the germans special fuel for their planes during ww2.anyone who holds back overunity should be charged with treason and genocide against the earth and man.death to the trillion dollar oil business.
have you ever heard of a voltage doubler circuit ? They do not need all these rotations, Trust me, I can get a Few KVs from a 12 V supply just using the dumbest and the sickest transformer ever produced even in the early 1900s. you never mentioned about the currents that are you are driving.
If you used 1 AMP and 12V and got 24 Volts and 1AMP using that sick rotation, you would be every one's hero and would end up in History Books. Make sure you post more on that, It is watts !
Voltage is not comparable to energy. Every simple transformer steps up (AC) voltage, but at the same time loses some energy. In other words: no free lunch here...
my friend, show as your magic....! my devices are experimental, but i measure the input and out put voltage, no matter if is or not overunity....! the important thing is "experimentation"....!
I'm no scientist or anything but it seems to get over unity wouldn't the current coming from just 1 wound coil have to be greater than the current going into the pulse coil. The other question I have with this as well as other videos I've seen is why aren't the rigs ever vacuumed considering (and I'm assuming) you have bearings why add air friction into the equation?
we are still in the testing stages, but the disk is spinning faster than before.giving us more volts, no readings have been done on amps. , until we have the circuit right, no real testing will be done
It looks pretty good. Get it spinning as fast as it will go then try hooking the 24 volt output in place of the battery and see if it will still run without the battery.
check out kubicop, he's on my friend list. you can capture the off pulses and put them back into a capasitor to use as radient energy. also i found that hho work good with high voltage no amps. so your machine might be good to run a hho system.
This pulse motor works for sure.....
If you want to know more about the free energy generator..
Do a Google search with the keyword "Top Magnet Generator Free Energy" ...
Choose the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)
Rick007191 1 month ago 2
for all you people that like to criticize my motor and have nothing good to say....................., try and make a better one
jasonspinmaster 8 months ago 3
the name of the song please
miraje11 10 months ago
this is a fail because it would take twice as long to recharge the 12 volt batery from 24 v dc output in fact as soon as you hook this up to a charger you would loose the charge much quicker than you could put it back in
TheBraz2010 1 year ago
I'd like to know the input and output power (volts x amps). Measure output under a small resistive (10k )load
djburke135 1 year ago
Erm, why use the battery? Hook it up to itself then produce 12v - now that would impress me.
skinsisagod 1 year ago
i also think that frequency generated would lead to more interesting stuff regarding this machine. do you know of ed leedskalnin? i'm assuming you do. why not try using it for antigrav?
dunkdriver1972 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
perplexfraction 1 year ago
Take the battery off. Then show it running.
gorgeousdzastr 1 year ago
nice work but gay music
bagredositio 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $30 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 15 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly about $10 000.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
its all about the watts genious
thesquirrel821 1 year ago
a battery, not so free than...
ExperiencedGhost 1 year ago
You made a transformer. Nice.
pbc1951 1 year ago
@pbc1951 you forgot.....inefficient mate!
dunkdriver1972 1 year ago
I can make a device that raises circuit potential 10 times, not 2.
Its called a TRANSFORMER
strigger 1 year ago
What about Watts? Watts = actual power used or created. Also, higher volts = lower amps. Calculate wattage output from the batteries and wattage output from the generator. This will give you real numbers to judge the efficiency of your contraption. I like to see these tinkerings. But what impresses me most is the numbers. Without the numbers, nothing else matters. Keep going!
futurevent 2 years ago
@futurevent you'd have to account for reactance in that equation as well. motors require power factor correction as the voltage and current are out of phase due to the reactance. build a transformer instead i reckon. nice engineering though.
dunkdriver1972 1 year ago
Never give up top marks you get many people motivated
allcingeye 2 years ago
wow , a mechanical Dc-Dc converter =)
RoteKampfSocke 2 years ago
Stop Atomovkam
pepezeusali 2 years ago
maybe you got a 12 volt to 24 volt increase
but you prolly got like 1/4 of the amperage coming out
just sit and watch your battery get drained
chrism216 2 years ago 6
Here we go again, more rock music used to illustrate an invention. Get rid of the noise and show us what you've got.
zeekwolfe 2 years ago
unix001: Yep.. Without a load or some way to measure wattage in VS out, you might as well just save all the moving parts and try a common day invention called a Transformer. They have them as close as 98-99% efficient.. Can't really beat that..
klexn 2 years ago
voltage means nothing. you might be putting in 12v and like 500A which is
6000W and getting out 24V and like 20A which is 480W which is considerably lower than the power going in.
unix001 2 years ago 3
Umm...come on, raise your hands: How many idiots here think that going from 12V to 24V implies an energy gain?
GetMeThere1 2 years ago 12
Where can I buy this machine?
LUKAAA1 2 years ago
I can make 1V go to a 1000V with a load of transformers. What we need to know is the power output vs power input, which is measured in Watts. You multiply the voltage by the current to determine the wattage. If you can prove the Pout is > Pin, you've solved the energy crisis.
tropicallanterns 2 years ago 4
looks like a vinyl record player.
(without autochanger)
gotobedandtickler 2 years ago
I like how you do the "I'm on the frontier of science!" thing to rationalize what is ultimately pseudo-science, and then say "have a great life" to close the door on the issue. Nice.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
Go back to your original post about atom bombs and nuclear power plants:
"Both produce more energy then we put in. "
It's plain false. We put IN radioactive elements, and OUT comes the energy in heat form. Nothing is gained or lost. It's simply a conversion. Of course you know that. So why do you insist on using the term "over unity" in the most misleading way possible, as do all the "free energy" scammers? Have you something to sell us?
planetdarwin 2 years ago
omg
Geek, joke, thats cool, oh and if u have some time, try to build water drip generator. That s something! xD
TUUBproductions 2 years ago
Looks like microsofts prototype hard drive for windows 95. (lol)
gotobedandtickler 2 years ago
Will I be able to run the new Microsoft Windows 7 with one of these?
Triumph750Bonneville 2 years ago
i understand that you are all talking about amps and ohms, i am on a new trigger system which is on my other video and i will soon be connecting a load to it...................thanks for watching
jasonspinmaster 2 years ago
How many amper you have 24 volts???
vejinac 2 years ago
You can put 110 volts into a Tesla coil and get hundreds of thousands of volts out (or more). That doesn't mean anything. How many amperes do you put in vs. what you get out? If you draw a load off the output, does it slow down or stop the wheel? The biggest problem with most "perpetual" designs is that if you try to draw power off of it, it fails.
ogremeisterdom 2 years ago
It's good to explore new engineering designs and try new things, but let's be serious: Over-unity energy is not a physical reality as we understand the laws of the universe.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
In fact it is possible, and it is used too, and every person on earth knows about it. The atomic bomb is an over unity device, and a nuclear power plant is also an over unity device.
Both produce more energy then we put in.
The solution to get over unity is a chain reaction. The concept works, is proven, and is used every single day by hundreds of millions of people all over the planet. Even Albert Einstein did admit that it was possible during the Manhattan project.
Peace and greets, iT
insAneTunA 2 years ago
Hey dick breath,
If your definition of an "over unity device" is anything which gives us more energy than we put in, then guess what else qualifies as "over unity"? Gasoline, flatbread pizzas, and horses.
Your implication that atom bombs and nuclear power plants extract magical amounts of energy is ignorant and/or mis-informed. There is a finite amount of energy in the nuclear forces, and no amount of daisy-chaining will allow for perpetual energy.
PS - Einstein never admitted any such thing.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
Over unity is not the same as perpetual motion.
And better do some research about a chain reaction. Nobody, including me, said something about infinite energy. The discussion was about getting more energy out then you put in, even if that is only for a short period of time. With a nuclear power plant it is just that what they do. You can jump high and low, and say whatever you want. The truth is that over unity does exist.
Peace, iT
insAneTunA 2 years ago
Yes Albert Einstein did admit, otherwise they could not make a nuclear bomb. Albert Einstein first didn't think it was possible, but he was convinced at an older age by one of his colleagues or former students or whatever.
insAneTunA 2 years ago
Your implication is that Albert Einstein was a fan of goofy basement machines people build to get energy from nothing. That implies he did not understand thermodynamics. :/
planetdarwin 2 years ago
You don't read what I say, you just have a big plate in front of your head. I do not claim that energy is made out of nothing because that is simply not possible. Energy can't be PRODUCED, it can only change forms. But it is possible to collect more enrgy then the energy that is used to pwer a device that is collecting energy. And I never mentioned anything about perpetual motion. You keep coming with that BS argument. I am the last person on earth that will say that perpetual motion is possible
insAneTunA 2 years ago
I wonder how many of your comrades here on YouTube and in the "perpetual motion" hobby group would agree with your definition of "over unity"? It seems pretty apparent to me that most of them are on a quest for a device which creates magical energy from nothing.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
I never said perpetual motion is possible. Read again man.
insAneTunA 2 years ago
Then you should avoid using the phrase "over unity, a term most often used (and interpreted) as a synonym for "free energy", "perpetual motion", and in general pseudo-science.
Now if you want to play word games and try to re-define "over unity" beyond the common interpretation, that's fine, but don't expect people to magically understand that you've change it, just as it would be silly for me to claim I found a unicorn and then later reveal that my definition of "unicorn" is "white horse".
planetdarwin 2 years ago
it is not my problem that you make every interpretation of the words over unity that you like.
Peace and greets, iT
insAneTunA 2 years ago
It is your problem, because my interpretation is the interpretation of the majority. If you're on a mission to re-define something, you should make it clear that's what you're doing instead of acting offended when someone suddenly realizes you've changed all the definitions from what most people understand them to be.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
once upon a time the majority thought the earth was flat.
Now you stick to the majority and have a great life :-)
insAneTunA 2 years ago
That's a poor analogy, because facts are independent from the majority's understanding of them, while the definitions of words (being nothing more than a communication tool) really are influenced and controlled by the majority.
Do you even know what you're talking about? It seems like you're backpedaling. Do you even realize that the phrase "over unity" is to "perpetual motion" just as "intelligent design" is to "creationism"? It's just a sly shift in vocabulary. The pseudoscience is the same.
planetdarwin 2 years ago
You have chosen the name Darwin and yet you refuse to accept new science and discoveries and technologies. That is your choice, I do not have a problem with that. Just believe what you want to believe and what you are able to understand, and then everything is OK. If that makes you happy then it's fine with me.
There is no need to try to convince me to stick to the old information like you prefer to do, I do much rather look at new discoveries and new technologies.
Peace, iT
insAneTunA 2 years ago
well, again and for the last time, have a great life.
Ok? Do you get the it?
insAneTunA 2 years ago
That rotor, work really alone???Always?
PLASTERM66 2 years ago
Congratulations to your contraption.
Pleeeeeeease forget the voltage! How many ohms??? ampers???? Most people understand about voltage but this is not important .
Godarth 2 years ago 3
if u want to die make a fuel saving device and refuse to sell it to the oil companies.of course overunity is possible.the oil companies control the goverment and universities.the oil companies should be charged with treason and we can start with standard oil for selling the germans special fuel for their planes during ww2.anyone who holds back overunity should be charged with treason and genocide against the earth and man.death to the trillion dollar oil business.
ez3usx2 2 years ago 3
You would have to charge Ford Motor company and many others with treason also.
ogremeisterdom 2 years ago
Keep it up man!!
TyPh11 2 years ago 3
Hello Jason.
have you ever heard of a voltage doubler circuit ? They do not need all these rotations, Trust me, I can get a Few KVs from a 12 V supply just using the dumbest and the sickest transformer ever produced even in the early 1900s. you never mentioned about the currents that are you are driving.
If you used 1 AMP and 12V and got 24 Volts and 1AMP using that sick rotation, you would be every one's hero and would end up in History Books. Make sure you post more on that, It is watts !
acpadhi 2 years ago 4
acpadhi
I agree,
It's how many watts input -vs- watts output,
and yes even a gain of 1% would make your name known for centuries
uzijohn 2 years ago
oh finally a clever dude XD
KeyBladeGriever91 2 years ago
Comment removed
acpadhi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe it! I was able to build a magnetic generator that powers all my kitchen appliances using the plans at:
magniwork-review.blogspot(DOT)com
taraff1 2 years ago
Voltage is not comparable to energy. Every simple transformer steps up (AC) voltage, but at the same time loses some energy. In other words: no free lunch here...
Henk10002 2 years ago
man i bet that would make awsome wind generator,,,, you should load test it...
crob227 2 years ago
nice CD player just jokein
nice work !!
pitbike2006 2 years ago
my friend, show as your magic....! my devices are experimental, but i measure the input and out put voltage, no matter if is or not overunity....! the important thing is "experimentation"....!
skycollection 2 years ago
so what ?.
nitramsnimmuc 2 years ago
Did you do a load and volt test?
Input/output test will show how efficient your motor is.
TommeyReed 2 years ago
maybe edison is ac/dc.
TheRaconteur333 3 years ago
all this work is point less because after 300 billion dollars and 75 more years
hot fusion will have achieved break even
datzfast 3 years ago
i under stand i am only showing volts. on my new coil, i am using only 0.18m amps to pulse the coil at about 500 RPM.
i am waiting for some new magnets, which will give me 48 magnets in total on the new disk, plus some new tricks on sound !!!!
jasonspinmaster 3 years ago
I'm no scientist or anything but it seems to get over unity wouldn't the current coming from just 1 wound coil have to be greater than the current going into the pulse coil. The other question I have with this as well as other videos I've seen is why aren't the rigs ever vacuumed considering (and I'm assuming) you have bearings why add air friction into the equation?
lordtek2k2 3 years ago
we are still in the testing stages, but the disk is spinning faster than before.giving us more volts, no readings have been done on amps. , until we have the circuit right, no real testing will be done
jasonspinmaster 3 years ago
It looks pretty good. Get it spinning as fast as it will go then try hooking the 24 volt output in place of the battery and see if it will still run without the battery.
kwalper57 3 years ago 2
Can you make a crank start magnetic engine that puts out 12 volts?
1plus1equalssex 3 years ago
What is that song? :P
DarkenedSol666 3 years ago
is there only 1 firing coil? and 4 pickup coils... do you have the coils doubly wound? how are u timing pulses? reed switch?
i made my first pulse motor yesterday:
watch?v=08us1WyIDFE
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
step up transformer ,and efficient motor with unique charactoristics nice motor !
johncarl43447 3 years ago
you should start off with a basic motor like the Bedini motor and learn from there. you can find how to make the motor on youtube
jasonspinmaster 3 years ago
Hello! anyone know thoose?
- what if you make second wheel and put another side of coil!
- is it recieve DC and generete AC power?
-if i assemble multible coil, do i still need transistors?i cannot find here.
- i gues transistors only key for circiut! can i use limit swithc instead of transistors?
i found the best swtiches. when its close it is reverse the poles.
- will it work without battery? forexample i will start with drill!
Best regards and success for all !
living4game 3 years ago
Have you got overunity?
existance12d 3 years ago
my motor is down at the moment, and i am waiting for new sensors. i will give full results COMING SOON.
jasonspinmaster 3 years ago
How much current in and how much out (in a known load)?
If the out current is less than half of the in current, then you have a fancy step up transformer with a rectifier.
Anyway good job !
OmegaThe1 3 years ago
check out kubicop, he's on my friend list. you can capture the off pulses and put them back into a capasitor to use as radient energy. also i found that hho work good with high voltage no amps. so your machine might be good to run a hho system.
crob227 3 years ago
yeh kubicop has excellent vids..
dodoshlodo 3 years ago