How could a Werewolf movie be this boring! The characters are so dull and unlikable. I thoughtit was funny how Emily Blunt fell in love with her dead fiances brother a week after his death lol. Especialy as they hardley speak two words to eachother except when he shows her how to skip stones. She must fall in love very easily.
why the fuck do people refer to shutter island as a horror film all the time? e[a0hfdea[n0fashf[n0asiofhn\zOFihsanfcpsdauofn piece of shit is barely a thriller
I liked the movie to be honest. It was different seeing a werewolf with a more human look but man, he was a monster. Compared to some werewolves we seen before this guy actually was agreesive and bloody.
9.5/10 This movie was badass. Whenever he transformed into the werewolf, I found myself with my jaw dropped at many of the action scenes. The only problem is the ending. I just don't like it when there's that one person that the creature won't kill. Most of the time, it's the love interest.
Lycanthropy comes from the greek mythology of King Lycaeon of Arcadia, who was turned to a wolf after offering a tainted dish ( human flesh of a prisoner ) to Zeus.
Werewolf comes from the old english word wer ( man ) wulf ( wolf )
this movie was good not great i liked it but i felt the gore and blood kinda out weighed the drama it seemed as tho the director didnt know exactly what kind of movie he was trying to make either please the blood and gore crowd or the fans of the original but in all joe johnston didnt do to bad
its not a great movie but its a fun little horror movie. i like how it didnt follow the original that much and how it was its own thing. thats how remakes should be. they should do their own thing.
I think a lot of poeple that really liked this film are reeling over how much Twilight did to destroy the werewolf legend. But, this movie really wasn't good at all. Everything was CGI'ed to death. They should have stuck with the original plot more than they did. It's like they read the first two lines of the original and said "Fuck it.". It had a comic book plot. People only like the mood in this movie because Hollywood rarely dabbles in this gothic horror theme. It was refreshing, not good.
well i really didnt like this movie i thought it was only blood and way to much scare moments. not that the scare moments are bad but there were way too much.
LON LIVES ON! a good movie i would give it an 8.5 and even though it's impossible to beat the original this was a great remake. all they need to do is remake the house of series, that would be awsome!
@The3Downz Well, thats what they were doing I mean sure the transformation was CGI but it looked cool and other than that, there were making all the special effects as real as possible. This is the best werewolf film I have seen in many years:)
I'm 14 years old and I LOVED that movie. I mean, this is what a werewolf would look like if they were real, not some dog faced mutt. Think realistically, but you can't really be realistic about this. Anyway, just imagine they are real, how are you suppose to change a human, into a huge dog that walks on two legs. THIS is way way more reasonable.
it was great i think, i dont know why critics hated it so much, and alot of those criticism seem pretty invalid, i've read/heard people say the acting sucks, while other said the acting was too much.
@p4cm4n182 Yeah, seriously. I have the original on dvd and I'm a huge werewolf fan. I saw it and I enjoyed it. I mean I had my share of seeing bad werewolf films but this didn't suck and I wish people of this generation appreciated it more. I don't care what some people say or any of those bullshit critics rather on tv or on the internet, it was truley a very decent werewolf film.
Just caught it at the dollar cinema, I'm poor not cheap, and it was okay. I could really have done without Hopkins. He chews the scenery as if he were an actual werewolf and starving. Del Toro seemed to have phoned this one in but I blame the director for that.Every one else was pretty good. I give it 6 out of 10 stars.
I was really looking forward this movie and I was seriously disappointed. The movie had a lot of fill in the blanks, they never explained the mith and you really could't feel Benicio's character or any other so.... I'll give it a 6 or 7
@hcubeentertainment Yeah but that douchey guy that played the human torch in the fantastic four movies has been cast as Captain America.I think that is a bad omen.
I thought this movie was mediocre at best. It took itself way too seriously and the editing was choppy as hell. Not to mention, the whole film felt like it was severely cut down. You could sense conflicts of interest at play.
Had heard so much bad but because of the visuals wanted to see this in the theatre. Better than I had feared. Blunt was really wasted, she could've been given more. Hopkins did great as usual, but didn't ask that much of him. Del Toro is an amazing actor but he just didn't work for me in this role. Too much sidetracking it seemed like. Great music though.
Those reviews couldn't be further from the truth I can not see how anyone could reccomend this movie to their friends I can not see a single aspect in this movie that could redeem the movie enough to go see it.
Aside from some cool practical effects nothing much else worth reccomending.Generic Predictable seen-it-all-before-done-much-better horror film.Wait until its on DVD 4/10
@charlescarter1989 I have no idea what you were watching man, everyone said it was way too gory. And the cheap effects were sort of the point of the movie, sticking to the classic
dude i love how instead of just sitting there bashing on it for 5 minutes (wasting my time) it actually reviews everything before and then gets opinions on it too so that it isnt just bullshit the whole time
i dont really like this film tbh.. the animations are good the action is good the parts wich make you jumpn are good but... te story isnt really that good. i give the movie a 6/10
I give it a 5/10. The pacing was off, the characters were unsympathetique and the extensive use of CGi in the transformation scenes ruined he magic and the chance for an Academy Award nomination; this movie is by no means Academy Award wearthy.
Lycan my friend not werewolf stop with Human words, be more poetic, use other words for once oh yeah one more thing the proper word for Vampire is Homunis Nocturna. Seriously stop with the modern words Werewolf replaced the word which is Lycan I'm serious about this.
Actually the term is lycanthrope. But then you wouldn't know that since you're just basing this on Underworld, which shows that you really don't know what you're talking about. And though the term Lycanthropy derives from ancient Greek, The word werewolf is far from modern, having its origins in old English. Also, "Homunis Nocturna" is just a silly latin-sounding phrase made up by pathetic goth kids. And by the way, all words are human words.
Nice clip, have you seen the new wolfman movie? that movie was awesome, i saw it yesterday and now i cant stop watching it online at moviesonline.blogbugs. org
haha yes i myself personally enjoyed this movie, the dude getting owned in the woods especally, it was priceless lol, my date that i was with i could feel her jump though her hand, i persoanlly give this movie about a 8.5-9
(2/10) I thought the film failed in it's objective to reach me at an emotional level as well as leaving me to feel as if the director didn't really know how to tell the story visually instead he used cheap scares and big names.
6/10. Benicio Del Toro was a good enough substitute for Lon Chaney Jr. for modern horror but there aren't any modern day actors that can compete with the original Masters of Horror.
Overall the movie was perfectly balance, very little cgi but perfectly done and the make up was flawless,i would say the only week part of the movies was the story line witch was not so original overall rating 8/10.
Good movie. I agree with the little usage of computer animation comment. The movie itself was well rounded and had a great sense of suspense. I would give it an 8.5/10.
I would probably give it an eight out of ten. For my summary I would say it was a good, genuine horror movie that was refreshing to the horror genre fans and that they could make an awesome horror movie without pointless sex and language.
@skydark Sorry to disappoint you but it isn't going to go anywhere. It will get better but there's just no way to do the things they do in films now using traditional methods. People would laugh if they had some guy dressed up in a wolfman suit.
You misinterpreted my commentary. I don't mean they should go back to old special effects; I meant that the 80's and the 90's were particular in the sense that large scoped movies were extremely expensive and so they resorted to story development, acting or whatever else of value.
Nowadays, with CGI becoming cheaper and cheaper, producers can offer a visual spectacle that offers very little in cinematic terms.
Originality is a rarity.
eg:Avatar-a new breed of cgi film. And I wasn't impressed.
@skydark We'd have to agree to disagree then because I really enjoyed Avatar. I think I look more at the potential than where we are at the moment. Just like with the current crop of video games that often offer style over substance. There is still a level of progression and eventually they'll learn to put it together the correct way. Making films has always been about experimentation. That's a huge part of the fun of cinematography.
"I don't understand why we have to experiment with film. I think everything should be done on paper. A musician has to do it, a composer. He puts a lot of dots down and beautiful music comes out. And I think that students should be taught to visualize. That's the one thing missing in all this. The one thing that the student has got to do is to learn that there is a rectangle up there - a white rectangle in a theater - and it has to be filled."
@skydark And that is one man's feeling on the matter. Obviously not everyone is going to agree with him, and that's a part of being human. No one man should ever define the direction of an artistic endeavor such as filmmaking.
@skydark That's cool. I always enjoyed Hitchcock. Some of the best suspense films ever made. He was probably responsible for a lot of the nightmares I had as a kid. : )
terrible movie a lot of lifeless crap, POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT!!!!!, it is really just a slaughter fest with some notes of horror. and i use some as in it is barely or not at all
'cause the video is called "the wolfman movie review", does other people's opinion bother you? this movie is not that good... it's not scary, and it's not that interesting... perhaps you should see it.
I'm not sure what the movie was missing. I am a huge wolfman fan, as it remins one of my favs of the classic monsters. But there was something empty about the film. I can not put my finger on it. I did love the updated classic wolfman look, and the transformations. I loved the actors, but there was something lifless about the project. Maybe I wanted to love it too much.
3/10. Terrible CGI, bad acting (even Anthony Hopkins didn't seem into it), entirely unoriginal plot with no surprises, an antagonist with no logical motivation, and honestly the jump scenes really sucked. They weren't scaryh, just loud.
However, Hugo Weaving and Benecio del Toro did fantastic jobs; their characters were very believable and interesting, I loved the makeup, it was a great nod to the original, and the sets and costumes were fantastic. But still no excuse for everything else.
With a solid plot, actors that did justice to their roles, and a couple of kickass transformation scenes, The Wolfman delivers a gorey good time to the viewers. 9/10
8/10 Leaving some areas unfortunately unexplored, The Wolfman nevertheless provided plenty of jumps, the occasional clever twist, & a path to "Wolfman 2."
6.5/10. Definitely could have been better, I wasn't a big fan of what looked like a couple guys in fury costumes wrestling and some of the other details of the movie.
This movie didn't even have a plot till about half way in and there were plenty of corny and "what...." moments, the special effects and its setting only made it good.
this movie was excellent and epic ! not like that shit of twilight and the others shitty sagas...
ervin3422 2 months ago
Stream..,It`'.Now''.
ＷＷＷ.ＭＯＶＩＥＳＩＮＨＤ.ＴＫ
Copy"..&`,`Paste,",
likeablehinge398F 7 months ago
i like you lemonvampire1 (as a friend) and the wolfman was EPIC!!!!!!1
kaijuwarrior 8 months ago
How could a Werewolf movie be this boring! The characters are so dull and unlikable. I thoughtit was funny how Emily Blunt fell in love with her dead fiances brother a week after his death lol. Especialy as they hardley speak two words to eachother except when he shows her how to skip stones. She must fall in love very easily.
rodster6 9 months ago
why the fuck do people refer to shutter island as a horror film all the time? e[a0hfdea[n0fashf[n0asiofhn\zOFihsanfcpsdauofn piece of shit is barely a thriller
skatejam7 9 months ago
I liked the movie to be honest. It was different seeing a werewolf with a more human look but man, he was a monster. Compared to some werewolves we seen before this guy actually was agreesive and bloody.
Securitron343 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To Watch All The latest Films Online For Free Check Out My Channel
trocastire5791 10 months ago
man I thought that the movie was really good!! And with the way it ended they should make some sort of sequel or something.
AlteredBridge1 11 months ago
LOL! Where the hell did these people come from?! They thought The Wolfman was GOOD?
Chrisdrumz 11 months ago
I loved this movie. I love period films.
roflcunnt 1 year ago
100% movie to watch! ive watched this at webmovietube and many other more movies too :)
josieradomski81 1 year ago
Yeah this movie wasn't really as good as i thought it would be
DeadVenom01 1 year ago
9.5/10 This movie was badass. Whenever he transformed into the werewolf, I found myself with my jaw dropped at many of the action scenes. The only problem is the ending. I just don't like it when there's that one person that the creature won't kill. Most of the time, it's the love interest.
Ryanmiller70 1 year ago
Lycanthropy comes from the greek mythology of King Lycaeon of Arcadia, who was turned to a wolf after offering a tainted dish ( human flesh of a prisoner ) to Zeus.
Werewolf comes from the old english word wer ( man ) wulf ( wolf )
godawar 1 year ago
good movie
masterwindu1234 1 year ago
kitty hat...
lizNbarby5 1 year ago
WÃTCH at GetMovie . Us ;)
WatchMovieOnlineHere 1 year ago
this movie was good not great i liked it but i felt the gore and blood kinda out weighed the drama it seemed as tho the director didnt know exactly what kind of movie he was trying to make either please the blood and gore crowd or the fans of the original but in all joe johnston didnt do to bad
Aikidolover29 1 year ago
5.5 cuz they used other language as a gipsy one. Thats NOT a gipsy language!
drazvannn 1 year ago
This was a very decent werewolf that i have seen in a long and I will take this over that twilight stuff any day:)
piloneman 1 year ago
8.5
luisjayson 1 year ago
I love this movie, a classic done with a modern day twist, love, rage and a passion for revenge, sounds like a hit to me, lol!
Schon05 1 year ago
its not a great movie but its a fun little horror movie. i like how it didnt follow the original that much and how it was its own thing. thats how remakes should be. they should do their own thing.
GamingShadow01 1 year ago
I think a lot of poeple that really liked this film are reeling over how much Twilight did to destroy the werewolf legend. But, this movie really wasn't good at all. Everything was CGI'ed to death. They should have stuck with the original plot more than they did. It's like they read the first two lines of the original and said "Fuck it.". It had a comic book plot. People only like the mood in this movie because Hollywood rarely dabbles in this gothic horror theme. It was refreshing, not good.
TenderTrap86 1 year ago
this film is a disappointment ...the trailer is good but not the film
Eric68B 1 year ago
well i really didnt like this movie i thought it was only blood and way to much scare moments. not that the scare moments are bad but there were way too much.
metalink21 1 year ago
LON LIVES ON! a good movie i would give it an 8.5 and even though it's impossible to beat the original this was a great remake. all they need to do is remake the house of series, that would be awsome!
IGOTYR64 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Incredible Movie! I was searching around the internet and found this amazing site that
let me watch this whole movie for free. If you want to check it out just go to google and
put in (:Y: slides) and google should bring up the site first result. Unfortunately im not
able to just give you the direct link because I dont want to get my youtube account in
trouble for spam or something stupid like that.
RTInation 1 year ago
@The3Downz Well, thats what they were doing I mean sure the transformation was CGI but it looked cool and other than that, there were making all the special effects as real as possible. This is the best werewolf film I have seen in many years:)
piloneman 1 year ago
This is how werewolves should look like...not the like they do in the gay Twilight shit...
rockndude87 1 year ago 5
wow.... 10... 9 and a half... ???!!!
defaultname365 1 year ago
it was good.
TheDarthZ 1 year ago
If this movie had more practical effects and less CGI it would feel a lot more real and creepy.
Th3Downz 1 year ago
wait just a god darned minute! Jurassic Park 4?!
MEG2th 1 year ago
my fav horor movie of all time
299bc 1 year ago
What is wrong with everyone? Why am i the only who thought this was a GOOD movie?!
stijnreigel 1 year ago 21
@stijnreigel Trust me, your not the only one.
piloneman 1 year ago
@stijnreigel your not the only one. i LOVED this movie :))
lizNbarby5 11 months ago
I'm 14 years old and I LOVED that movie. I mean, this is what a werewolf would look like if they were real, not some dog faced mutt. Think realistically, but you can't really be realistic about this. Anyway, just imagine they are real, how are you suppose to change a human, into a huge dog that walks on two legs. THIS is way way more reasonable.
waritgreen 1 year ago 6
Twilight wolf pack my ass. Now THAT'S A WEREWOLF.
0Idskool 1 year ago 8
it was great i think, i dont know why critics hated it so much, and alot of those criticism seem pretty invalid, i've read/heard people say the acting sucks, while other said the acting was too much.
p4cm4n182 1 year ago
@p4cm4n182 Yeah, seriously. I have the original on dvd and I'm a huge werewolf fan. I saw it and I enjoyed it. I mean I had my share of seeing bad werewolf films but this didn't suck and I wish people of this generation appreciated it more. I don't care what some people say or any of those bullshit critics rather on tv or on the internet, it was truley a very decent werewolf film.
piloneman 1 year ago 2
i love this movie. i cant wait for this to hit Blu Ray
GamingShadow01 1 year ago
this movie was great and it had more jumpy scare moments then i expected
DarkSectorMaster 1 year ago
Just caught it at the dollar cinema, I'm poor not cheap, and it was okay. I could really have done without Hopkins. He chews the scenery as if he were an actual werewolf and starving. Del Toro seemed to have phoned this one in but I blame the director for that.Every one else was pretty good. I give it 6 out of 10 stars.
AL13NM 1 year ago
Is it just me or does Grace Randolph kinda sound like a chick version of Goofy, lol?
R2R3L4 1 year ago
a 9?
That's way to much.
I was really looking forward this movie and I was seriously disappointed. The movie had a lot of fill in the blanks, they never explained the mith and you really could't feel Benicio's character or any other so.... I'll give it a 6 or 7
GABYINCUBUSMcCARTNEY 1 year ago
W00t Captian America is getting a movie!
hcubeentertainment 1 year ago
@hcubeentertainment Yeah but that douchey guy that played the human torch in the fantastic four movies has been cast as Captain America.I think that is a bad omen.
AL13NM 1 year ago
I thought this movie was mediocre at best. It took itself way too seriously and the editing was choppy as hell. Not to mention, the whole film felt like it was severely cut down. You could sense conflicts of interest at play.
GWStreicher 1 year ago
worst movie i have ever seen
wldcatfrlf08 2 years ago
worst movie ive ever seen
claycraigo 2 years ago
hey i like jumanji
rext08 2 years ago 2
everything happens very fast in the beginning, How can they fell in love in the first 15 min?.
yeah It was a disapointment.
Lz60s 2 years ago 3
Had heard so much bad but because of the visuals wanted to see this in the theatre. Better than I had feared. Blunt was really wasted, she could've been given more. Hopkins did great as usual, but didn't ask that much of him. Del Toro is an amazing actor but he just didn't work for me in this role. Too much sidetracking it seemed like. Great music though.
Goblinmoon 2 years ago
7.5 - was very good, as soon as the action kicked in it was an immense movie but slow in some parts.
spongebo13 2 years ago
I had expected more from this movie.... It was a disapointment.
mertdejedi 2 years ago 3
I thought the movie would be more in the spirit of Bram Stokers Dracula, but I was let down. :(
buffycharmedangel102 2 years ago
Those reviews couldn't be further from the truth I can not see how anyone could reccomend this movie to their friends I can not see a single aspect in this movie that could redeem the movie enough to go see it.
wrestlingfan24 2 years ago
Wolfman was ok but it seemed like it was made in the 90's
luva90 2 years ago
Benicio del toro has better movies,like the 2 che guevara movies he made
folladordeprostis 2 years ago
10 really good i liked it the way he turned into the wolfman was amazing and the the love for the women was good and his dad was even better
paulisloayza 2 years ago
i found it boring
MeEpMiNk 2 years ago 3
Aside from some cool practical effects nothing much else worth reccomending.Generic Predictable seen-it-all-before-done-much-better horror film.Wait until its on DVD 4/10
3917Monkey 2 years ago
4/10 : "wait til its on DVD"
this movie was soooooooo boring.. seriously wait for the dvd dont waste money at the theatres!!
tmspaniagua 2 years ago
those people are so biased
they give it a 10
lol hilariaous
ffxiisucks 2 years ago
this movie is a joke
a bad one
ffxiisucks 2 years ago
I give your boobs a 10 : )
KrazyKKid 2 years ago 2
didnt like it 6/10
story was slow
effects were cheap (except for mid-transformation)
hardly any gore for a r-rated werewolf movie
plot kinda skips part here and there
the big fight or the "climax" was a dud
ending was whack
only thing good about this movie is anthony hopkins character, at times
charlescarter1989 2 years ago
@charlescarter1989 I have no idea what you were watching man, everyone said it was way too gory. And the cheap effects were sort of the point of the movie, sticking to the classic
p4cm4n182 1 year ago
dude i love how instead of just sitting there bashing on it for 5 minutes (wasting my time) it actually reviews everything before and then gets opinions on it too so that it isnt just bullshit the whole time
*LIKED IT* ;D
isukatlax 2 years ago
i dont really like this film tbh.. the animations are good the action is good the parts wich make you jumpn are good but... te story isnt really that good. i give the movie a 6/10
grodbottle 2 years ago
WOW, is this rated R in america?
In norway it`s only 15+
i didn`t like the movie BTW =(
Sbrff 2 years ago
WTF: Van Helsing is THE BEST wapire/werewolf movie of the 2000nds!!!!
Sbrff 2 years ago
This film was awesome,I saw it Friday.
doug8798 2 years ago
I give it a 5/10. The pacing was off, the characters were unsympathetique and the extensive use of CGi in the transformation scenes ruined he magic and the chance for an Academy Award nomination; this movie is by no means Academy Award wearthy.
SnyderFan91 2 years ago
You've done terrible things Universal, terrible things.
broadwaybabe07 2 years ago 2
P.S. I give it a four/ten.
broadwaybabe07 2 years ago
i am reviewing this review and it blows
texasdjjoker 2 years ago
Scary, voleint, insane. In other words the best werewolf movie I've ever seen.
ChevyTheWerewolf1 2 years ago 5
Lycan my friend not werewolf stop with Human words, be more poetic, use other words for once oh yeah one more thing the proper word for Vampire is Homunis Nocturna. Seriously stop with the modern words Werewolf replaced the word which is Lycan I'm serious about this.
DanteSparda08 2 years ago
Actually the term is lycanthrope. But then you wouldn't know that since you're just basing this on Underworld, which shows that you really don't know what you're talking about. And though the term Lycanthropy derives from ancient Greek, The word werewolf is far from modern, having its origins in old English. Also, "Homunis Nocturna" is just a silly latin-sounding phrase made up by pathetic goth kids. And by the way, all words are human words.
lemonvampire1 2 years ago 17
@lemonvampire1 and none of its real.
MEG2th 1 year ago
@lemonvampire1 Homunis Nocturna? lol. Never heard of that before. Pathetic term indeed.
SandBarAndYou 1 year ago
and how normal would you thin you would sound when you went around saying
"yeah! i saw that one movie about the Lycan and the one with the Hominis Nocturna was great too!"
ye[pp
sounds pretty normal ;P
shikamaru335 2 years ago 2
You either got "homunis nocturna" from the metal band or Blade: Trinity. Either way, you fail for counting these as serious sources.
whatakuriosgirl 2 years ago
@DanteSparda08 How can we stop with human words? No other species has created words we can use instead lol.
rodster6 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice clip, have you seen the new wolfman movie? that movie was awesome, i saw it yesterday and now i cant stop watching it online at moviesonline.blogbugs. org
xponyful 2 years ago
haha yes i myself personally enjoyed this movie, the dude getting owned in the woods especally, it was priceless lol, my date that i was with i could feel her jump though her hand, i persoanlly give this movie about a 8.5-9
lnknprkfn213 2 years ago 2
The movie was awesome, good acting, good setting, and kickass makeup by rick baker!
PittsBurghFuzz 2 years ago 2
Some elements from the original were better, but the changes made were necessary and the special effects were UNBELIEVABLE!
floggerschnoggin 2 years ago
that movie was awesome, it is one of my favorite movies, 100 out of 100
sami12381 2 years ago
It sucks compared to the original. The original had so much more depth and the original actor puts the new cast to shame.
lenerene 2 years ago
(2/10) I thought the film failed in it's objective to reach me at an emotional level as well as leaving me to feel as if the director didn't really know how to tell the story visually instead he used cheap scares and big names.
bobbyhicksfilms 2 years ago
The movie was good enough. Nothing really new though....Over all I would give it a 7.5/10
Massmurdajohn 2 years ago
Oliver Reed was miles better than Lon Chaney' as the wolfman.
MyMerlin1 2 years ago
The beast will have its day
119Starcream118 2 years ago
Really wanna see this movie
InsanePuppy11010 2 years ago
The film was creepy, horrifying and Anthony Hopkins was AMAZING!
10 out of 10
LightsCameraAaron 2 years ago
6/10. Benicio Del Toro was a good enough substitute for Lon Chaney Jr. for modern horror but there aren't any modern day actors that can compete with the original Masters of Horror.
pbtwentythree 2 years ago
i have one word to describe what this movie is not: bad. everything about this movie is satisfying, and i enjoyed every second of it.
Capstain259 2 years ago
Benicio del toro was good in both che guevara movies
kondurperusix 2 years ago
I loved this film. But quite surprised it didn't make 18
MrRelentlessFox 2 years ago
Overall the movie was perfectly balance, very little cgi but perfectly done and the make up was flawless,i would say the only week part of the movies was the story line witch was not so original overall rating 8/10.
Dreamimagi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free lockers invites just message me your email if you want you can make new email and just send that one to me. I will send
invite within 48 houres or maybe 24 houres depending on wher you live and what time its wher you live so just message me your
email and get a free invite!
GlowinPanda 2 years ago
from everything ive read up on, this movie was very well made.... may end up seeing this. wonder if its better than the original wolfman.
daveofTBZworld 2 years ago
does the bald guy look like Harvey Pekar to anyone else?
NightShatterer 2 years ago
: P
ECTBWHO 2 years ago
10/10 Great film with an amazing performance by the vetran Sir Anthony Hopkins.
salizarrr 2 years ago
What did she mean when she said "Johnston Faultered on Jumanji and jurassic park 3". Jumanji was a great film.
jon4games 2 years ago 2
girl at 3:42 is really cute ^_^
wayzhack69 2 years ago
lmao, "scary movies really work"
that means hes gettin laid.
AndyCarnage 2 years ago 2
9/10
slimy yet satisfying
shain003 2 years ago
that is quite the educated audience
confusedbugger 2 years ago
Althought the original will always be the better film, this remake does justice and maintains the classic horror gothic feel.
7/10
DoubleAAProduction88 2 years ago
Good visuals, but overall, Wolfman ends up defanged.
PhantomRonin 2 years ago
My One sentence review:
SIMPLY, UTTERLY, AMAZINGLY, FU**ING AWESOME. 10,000,000/10
BrilliantlyDUM 2 years ago
I went in not expecting the best movie ever and I wasn't really let down though the casting was fantastic. 7/10
stiltguyjoe 2 years ago
Good movie. I agree with the little usage of computer animation comment. The movie itself was well rounded and had a great sense of suspense. I would give it an 8.5/10.
SkyIive 2 years ago
This movie is so bad, seeing it well give you flees.
ogunshi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch the movie online at: AVIEWTO xCOM
mariloprimi 2 years ago
I haven't seen it yet but i want to
dbzgirl311 2 years ago
That Dwight Yokam looking motherfucker seems like a pompous ass.
khandjh 2 years ago
Hey Grace, check out our review over at Criticus Maximus, we gave the film a 2/10
MangaVox 2 years ago
I would probably give it an eight out of ten. For my summary I would say it was a good, genuine horror movie that was refreshing to the horror genre fans and that they could make an awesome horror movie without pointless sex and language.
MinimateMaster42k 2 years ago
jumanji was fucking great!
VortheDestructor 2 years ago
1/10 boring!
flowers05 2 years ago
10/10 shat my pants
luigi10011 2 years ago
9/10 Lovedd it
pokemongurlfan123 2 years ago
at 1:32 that kid with the dreads is a faaaaaggggeeetttt
zpoopfase55 2 years ago
@zpoopfase55 SO?
felipipi 2 years ago
From che guevara to wolfman
kondurperusix 2 years ago
the best invention in the world.... the medicine against sqaids, its some heavy SH*T!!!
chrisros1997 2 years ago
I can't wait for the CGI craze that studios have embraced to be done with.
skydark 2 years ago
@skydark Sorry to disappoint you but it isn't going to go anywhere. It will get better but there's just no way to do the things they do in films now using traditional methods. People would laugh if they had some guy dressed up in a wolfman suit.
Garrison64 2 years ago
You misinterpreted my commentary. I don't mean they should go back to old special effects; I meant that the 80's and the 90's were particular in the sense that large scoped movies were extremely expensive and so they resorted to story development, acting or whatever else of value.
Nowadays, with CGI becoming cheaper and cheaper, producers can offer a visual spectacle that offers very little in cinematic terms.
Originality is a rarity.
eg:Avatar-a new breed of cgi film. And I wasn't impressed.
skydark 2 years ago
@skydark We'd have to agree to disagree then because I really enjoyed Avatar. I think I look more at the potential than where we are at the moment. Just like with the current crop of video games that often offer style over substance. There is still a level of progression and eventually they'll learn to put it together the correct way. Making films has always been about experimentation. That's a huge part of the fun of cinematography.
Garrison64 2 years ago
I'll just quote the great Hitchcock:
"I don't understand why we have to experiment with film. I think everything should be done on paper. A musician has to do it, a composer. He puts a lot of dots down and beautiful music comes out. And I think that students should be taught to visualize. That's the one thing missing in all this. The one thing that the student has got to do is to learn that there is a rectangle up there - a white rectangle in a theater - and it has to be filled."
skydark 2 years ago
@skydark And that is one man's feeling on the matter. Obviously not everyone is going to agree with him, and that's a part of being human. No one man should ever define the direction of an artistic endeavor such as filmmaking.
Garrison64 2 years ago
I quoted him simply because he put into words what I feel about film experiments.
skydark 2 years ago
@skydark That's cool. I always enjoyed Hitchcock. Some of the best suspense films ever made. He was probably responsible for a lot of the nightmares I had as a kid. : )
Garrison64 2 years ago
Very well said. The second Starwars trilogy is a perfect example of that.
StinkyKnobcheese 2 years ago
terrible movie a lot of lifeless crap, POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT!!!!!, it is really just a slaughter fest with some notes of horror. and i use some as in it is barely or not at all
romangeneral14 2 years ago
wtf???
JP 4....that's just wrong
i hope that's just a rumor she made up
supercyc10 2 years ago
he should rob a bank and shut people up with hi own hair ball
josp3d 2 years ago
Why are people giving lame reviews in a comment box on Youtube?
Gamechild951 2 years ago 2
'cause the video is called "the wolfman movie review", does other people's opinion bother you? this movie is not that good... it's not scary, and it's not that interesting... perhaps you should see it.
FirstOutsider 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey check out my channel thanks :)
ALEDFRYTHOMASTV 2 years ago
I'm not sure what the movie was missing. I am a huge wolfman fan, as it remins one of my favs of the classic monsters. But there was something empty about the film. I can not put my finger on it. I did love the updated classic wolfman look, and the transformations. I loved the actors, but there was something lifless about the project. Maybe I wanted to love it too much.
themaddro 2 years ago
3/10. Terrible CGI, bad acting (even Anthony Hopkins didn't seem into it), entirely unoriginal plot with no surprises, an antagonist with no logical motivation, and honestly the jump scenes really sucked. They weren't scaryh, just loud.
However, Hugo Weaving and Benecio del Toro did fantastic jobs; their characters were very believable and interesting, I loved the makeup, it was a great nod to the original, and the sets and costumes were fantastic. But still no excuse for everything else.
JasonCloud 2 years ago
With a solid plot, actors that did justice to their roles, and a couple of kickass transformation scenes, The Wolfman delivers a gorey good time to the viewers. 9/10
WerewolfStory 2 years ago
I think it only has a M15+ rating in Australia.
1:48 yes, werewolf craze beats vampires.
RabidDog008 2 years ago
I expected a lot more from the movie.
JnthnRzc 2 years ago
wow, Grace Randolph is seriously hot. i love her voice
bleach29461 2 years ago 2
JUMANJI!!! ONE OF MY FAVES EVAR!!!
ManicBoii39 2 years ago
8/10 Leaving some areas unfortunately unexplored, The Wolfman nevertheless provided plenty of jumps, the occasional clever twist, & a path to "Wolfman 2."
NightAire 2 years ago
This movie was awesome..... I don't know why it's getting such scathing reviews (???????)
DrCheesewizard 2 years ago
Too fun to be serious yet too serious to be fun. 6/10
Wartooth95 2 years ago
6.5/10. Definitely could have been better, I wasn't a big fan of what looked like a couple guys in fury costumes wrestling and some of the other details of the movie.
stefty810 2 years ago
6/10, it had such great elements but fell short in making it a good film, it was teen wolf meets twilight meets evil dead.
CaptRach 2 years ago
i spent the entire movie jacking off and jizzing on the seat in front of me. so i loved it.
iHeartcardiology 2 years ago
lol wtf?
cartogropher 2 years ago
omg i watched the movie today it fuckin sucks its way gory tho but its sucks
jjjkkk57 2 years ago
A very nice revival of the classic 'werewolf' genre, none of that Twilight crud here.
TheDarkestHearts 2 years ago
This movie didn't even have a plot till about half way in and there were plenty of corny and "what...." moments, the special effects and its setting only made it good.
cartogropher 2 years ago
The film itself had much to be desired, but the great and deceiving ending made up for the cons. 8/10
amkdeath 2 years ago
This movie had me howling at the screen in boredom, and hoping for a silver bullet to the head. 5/10
Blair0927 2 years ago
the movie kicked ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
evillittleminion43 2 years ago
I give it a 6/10 it lacked the real and mysterious feel that "Dracula" has
snowinferno 2 years ago
A couple fun gory moments couldn't save this borefest that tried a little too hard.
respectablegentleman 2 years ago
Mad Hispanics lol
EuphMartiMusic 2 years ago
i love period movies. not to mention that it was beautifully shot. i thought it was a great movie.
che996 2 years ago
I recommend this movie and rate it an 8.
Sirrom0206