@marcccp1315 a dude standing in one place for 6 minutes, spilling facts and stats makes a boring video. For my audience that is a low key political activity, the motion helps make the video more enjoyable.
@TheConservativeNews Remember Reagan's support for AntiCommunist butchers in Guatemala and El Salvador, as well as his support for the Contra terrorists in Nicaragua, who killed up to 70 000 people
@ComradeFlorian31 and George Washington cut down a cherry tree. That myth is just that, a myth. A figment of the imagination of left leaning fiction book writers. Just like the "George Washington wasn't a Christian". where he WAS, the first time anyone openly speculated about his faith was in 1949 (i believe that was the release date) when someone released a book about how he wasn't, with 0 facts in it all speculation.
@ComradeFlorian31 "Well, according to The Black Book of Capitalism, Capitalism's death toll stands at about 140 MILLION."
Isn't it "neat" the way the left has to doctor the numbers to make their point? No, capitalist systems (while far from perfect) never carried out "terrors," pograms, mass arrests and/or mass executions that total anywhere near 140 million people.
I suspect you are including anyone who's ever died from poverty, disease, etc. Hardly deliberate murder.
@dgonz26868 Murder is murder, whether deliberate or not it's still murder. 140 million is 140 million and it's worse than Communism's death toll which is something like 100 million. Speaking of pogroms and mass-executions, how would you qualify incidents such as the Bodo League Massacre, King Leopold of Belgium's Congo Genocide, the mass bombing campaign against Korea and Vietnam etc etc
@ComradeFlorian31 "Murder is murder, whether deliberate or not it's still murder"
Definition of Murder (Wiki): "Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought.""
If you can find examples of such wholesale slaughter, being a matter of policy, among the totality of capitalism, I'd love to see it. I don't buy "Black Book of Capitalism's" fuzzy math claims about capitalism. They ignore the policies of mass murder carried out by commies & nazis (both leftwing).
@dgonz26868 It's a waste of time arguing with people like you, cause you refuse to apply to capitalism the same logic you apply to Communism, as the Communist's death toll ALSO includes a lot of deaths attributable to poverty, disease etc. You assert people who die of hunger under Capitalism are not victims of capitalism, yet people who die of hunger under Communist regimes should qualify as victims of Communism, despite the fact many Communist famines were in fact the result of enemy SABOTAGE
@dgonz26868 According to esteemed Canadian historian Douglas Tottle, KULAKS SLAUGHTERED 152 MILLION ANIMALS in Soviet Union between 1928-1933, of which 15 MILLION WERE HORSES nad 32 MILLION CATTLE and in 1932 ALONE KULAKS DESTROYED up to 50% OF THE HARVEST in certain Southerrn areas such as Ukraine, hardest hit by the famine. Source- Douglas Tottle- "Fraud, Famine, Fascism", chapter 8
@ComradeFlorian31 "According to esteemed Canadian historian Douglas Tottle"
He's not "esteemed." He's a soviet apologist. The causes & reasons for the famine are well known. Stalin's own daughter, Svetlana Alliluyeva said that her father called the famine a myth and "used the grain that could have save his people to buy heavy industrial machinery (all part of his industrial modernization program)."
Even Lavrenti Beria wanted to distance himself from Stalin, after his death.
@ComradeFlorian31 But in answer to your questions, everyone knows Syngman Rhee was a despot. And the sad reality of the cold war is that we supported such "men," as an alternative to "communist domination."
As for the Belgian Congo mess, it's just one more reason why the US had the right idea in declaring independence from European monarchs & their corrupt systems. Btw, it wasn't S. Korea or S. Vietnam (both US allies) who invaded their northern neighbors.
@TheyHearUsNow What about Kim Jong Il- the Non Gun Ri massacre and US bombing of Pyongyang aside, have you even heard of the Bodo League Massacre? Look it up
@ComradeFlorian31 no no no, you answer my question first you punk. You critisize Reagan for being a murderer yet you are probably a fan of Che, Stalin, Mao, and Castro who were murderers themselves. They killed over 100,000,000 people.
@TheyHearUsNow they killed over 100 million people, even if that was true, capitalism has killed 140 million according to The Black Book of Capitalism and White Christianity killed 100 MILLION NATIVE AMERICANS between 1492-1890, according to David Stannard's book "The American Holocaust'
@ComradeFlorian31 "even if that were true" Give me a break, where the hell did 77,000,000 Chinese people go during the rein of Mao? What happened to the 2 million starving North Koreans in the 90s? Why are you not questioning your own beliefs based on thes FACTS?
Why would you fear a registry could be used to confiscate firearms from legal gun owners? The 2nd Amendment protects the confiscation of firearms without due process of law.
@KyoNingyo i know, look at DC, and San Francisco, (those are the first two city's to come to my head) they are taking the guns away from people, and some politicians are trying to get the second amendment changed.
I used to have a carry conceal permit for New York State and personal protection demands private ownership for effective self defence. The criminal element is to well armed to think you are safe without good training and a firearm
taking away guns would create a massive and more expansive black Market mostly controlled by Violent street gangs and Mexican Organized crime rings etc so to ban guns would be pointless as it would not totally abolish guns. the issue of those felons they are getting guns from trade shows( open sales and in some states at those sales no back-round check is needed if it is a private sell). the idea that getting guns banned etc will lower crime is 100% false and is a false reality..good video man.
@thequeernews exactly! and it takes the guns away from the people to defend themselves. Criminals openly say that they are in favor of gun control. That says something. lol! thanks for the comment!
ALL East-European countries with gun laws have lower homocide rates than America, even while their crime rate is about as much or even highter (about 5-6 countries beat America on crime), due to the fact that you can't get a gun in your drawer. in my country, a man was murder, politically. the killer used a knife, as he couldn't get a gun. without wanting to make murder look smaller, that could be why a polital assault in your country takes 6 lives and in my country 1.
Norway got fewy low gun laws. Sweden, next to it, got much stricter. In sweden, the homocide rate is about 1/2 of Norway. In England, the crime rate is the highest, beating the number 2 with twice as much. but due to their strict gun laws, their homocide rate is one of the lowest of Europe.
@FireCannon27 ok.. i just read your comments. Now your comparisons of different country's dosnt work. Their are soooo many other things that play apart of murder rate. You need to find ONE country that had a high murder rate, then restricted guns (in some way) and that murder rate went down. Btw their are ZERO known cases of such an event happening. You need to find ONE country because, lets take a stroll back to science class. You look for evidence in subjects with ZERO VARIABLES. ONLY.
I guess americans just like killing then. killing is a part of life in America, then. if the homocide rates in the US are highter than any West-european country, that SHOULD make you think. I need a country with a high murder rate? how about the United States of America. countries with gun bans have lower homocide rates than US (except for countries like Mexico, and other countries which are messed up). even countries with more crime.
@FireCannon27 like i said in my last comment, so many things play into the homicide rate. Location, other laws, the time, the person in power. their are literally COUNTLESS things that play into it, that is why you cant compare different countries. And did you rally just say that the fact that the crime rate had been going down in Australia for 25 years, and the year they ban guns it rises by over 300% is some areas, and significantly everywhere, and that is just a coincidence? wow!
in 1997, private guns were banned in the UK. in the few years after, homocide rates went up. then, homocide rates dropped to one of the lowest of Europe, about half of the US (in statistic, so no BS about US being bigger).
got yar message, got the article. and you claim that I pick irrelevant numbers. first: all these numbers are from AFTER the gun ban, second, I talk about homocide only. I'd rather have 5 people robbed that 1 person dead. but that's a case of priorities.
@FireCannon27 my article clearly supports my claim, the numbers are comparing, ALL violent crimes involving guns, you said that homicide rate went down, this clearly says ALL violent crimes involving guns are currently higher than before the gun ban.
*rolls eyes* the violent crime rate of England is the highest of Europe, beating number 2 by twice as much (and beating the US by 3.5 times as much)! I'm talking about homocide only! England got a MASSIVE violent crime rate, but their gun MURDER rates are fairly low. look up those, and we will talk on.
@FireCannon27 you cant look at one aspect out of hundreds and say that the whole thing is bad, because one of the numbers may support you. which i have never seen. I have shown you several highly respected news press articles that support my arguments. I have seen zero from you.
your prospect of a crime increase is timely only. you need to get guns OUT of the market. black market? wtf that's were borders are for! how do YOU explain that every single West-european countries got lower homocide rates than the US. are you just more agressieve or may it just be that I'm right? you can't just 'get' a gun if they're illigal.
and should I be all wrong, if all my numbers mean nothing, then US is **** up. then you can't control blackmarket, then you can't control homocide. then you're about twice as blood-thirsty as Europeans-more, if you're right that gun would LOWER kill rates. man, what a **** country you got there. look at your country. a tool made for death and death only, is part of everyday life. easy to take it and teach that guy at school a lesson...
small point on ym 1th comment: tell me if my definition of milita is wrong. I'm not english and it quite likely. but I thought a milita was a town's milita, not a army.
aah, the video... well, let's see. you know my point of view I guess...
first of all: the 2th amandement. I disagree with that guy. I think it's like: 'because a well armed milita (that being the people fighting for their city instead of their county) is necessary to keep the government to be able to control the states (thus, taking away freedom), people have the right to bear arms so they can form a milita. it still supports your point, but I wanted to say it. this was first comment.
@FireCannon27 the Militia is the military force. The first part says that it is important for your country to have a military force to defend your country. The second part says, in addition the right of the people to keep and bear arms. so those people can defend themselves if needed. Which the founders knew that time would come again.
my bad then. must be confused... I though hte milia was the defences of the town, not the country. I didn't know that 'milita' and 'army' were the same.
(second comment) bear in mind though that different interpetations have more than once caused conflict. I don't know if I believe those scientists of you. I could find another claiming differently if i tried.
hey, i looked up 'militia', in the cambridge dictionary and it said :'a military force which only operates for some of the time and whose members often have other jobs'. so full-time soldiers (thus, the army) don't count. is it possible that you're wrong? hyperdictionary was even more direct: 'civilians trained as soldiers but not part of the regular army'.
why dont you just stand in one place.
marcccp1315 7 months ago
@marcccp1315 a dude standing in one place for 6 minutes, spilling facts and stats makes a boring video. For my audience that is a low key political activity, the motion helps make the video more enjoyable.
TheConservativeNews 7 months ago
man where did u get that poster in the backround i wasrofling at it
50TNCSA 7 months ago
@50TNCSA Are you talking about the gun target, i got it at the range...
TheConservativeNews 7 months ago
@50TNCSA no no the navy poster
50TNCSA 7 months ago
@50TNCSA oh! at our local fair!
TheConservativeNews 7 months ago
Good vid man.
Danstheman1357 8 months ago
@Danstheman1357 thanks!
TheConservativeNews 8 months ago
Reagan was a murderer
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 I dont see how that relates to this video at all, but what is your political argument to why that is?
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews Remember Reagan's support for AntiCommunist butchers in Guatemala and El Salvador, as well as his support for the Contra terrorists in Nicaragua, who killed up to 70 000 people
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 and George Washington cut down a cherry tree. That myth is just that, a myth. A figment of the imagination of left leaning fiction book writers. Just like the "George Washington wasn't a Christian". where he WAS, the first time anyone openly speculated about his faith was in 1949 (i believe that was the release date) when someone released a book about how he wasn't, with 0 facts in it all speculation.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 You got any idea how many millions of people the communist systems killed?
Russion: +20 million
China: +50 million
Cambodia: 2-3 million
Vietnam: +/-2 million
Who are the real butchers?
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@dgonz26868 Do YOU have any idea how many people CAPITALISM has killed?
Well, according to The Black Book of Capitalism, Capitalism's death toll stands at about 140 MILLION.
Who are the real butchers now?
Regan was INDEED a butchers, only brainwashed Conservatives like you would support this MADMAN.
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "Well, according to The Black Book of Capitalism, Capitalism's death toll stands at about 140 MILLION."
Isn't it "neat" the way the left has to doctor the numbers to make their point? No, capitalist systems (while far from perfect) never carried out "terrors," pograms, mass arrests and/or mass executions that total anywhere near 140 million people.
I suspect you are including anyone who's ever died from poverty, disease, etc. Hardly deliberate murder.
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@dgonz26868 Murder is murder, whether deliberate or not it's still murder. 140 million is 140 million and it's worse than Communism's death toll which is something like 100 million. Speaking of pogroms and mass-executions, how would you qualify incidents such as the Bodo League Massacre, King Leopold of Belgium's Congo Genocide, the mass bombing campaign against Korea and Vietnam etc etc
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "Murder is murder, whether deliberate or not it's still murder"
Definition of Murder (Wiki): "Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought.""
If you can find examples of such wholesale slaughter, being a matter of policy, among the totality of capitalism, I'd love to see it. I don't buy "Black Book of Capitalism's" fuzzy math claims about capitalism. They ignore the policies of mass murder carried out by commies & nazis (both leftwing).
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@dgonz26868 It's a waste of time arguing with people like you, cause you refuse to apply to capitalism the same logic you apply to Communism, as the Communist's death toll ALSO includes a lot of deaths attributable to poverty, disease etc. You assert people who die of hunger under Capitalism are not victims of capitalism, yet people who die of hunger under Communist regimes should qualify as victims of Communism, despite the fact many Communist famines were in fact the result of enemy SABOTAGE
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "You assert people who die of hunger under Capitalism are not victims of capitalism"
Wrong. I assert that they are not victims of deliberate MURDER.
"yet people who die of hunger under Communist regimes should qualify as victims of Communism"
Not all. Just the millions who died under Stalin's "Farm Collectivization Program (to name just one)."
"many Communist famines were in fact the result of enemy SABOTAGE"
BS. They were commie attempts to control populace.
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@dgonz26868 According to esteemed Canadian historian Douglas Tottle, KULAKS SLAUGHTERED 152 MILLION ANIMALS in Soviet Union between 1928-1933, of which 15 MILLION WERE HORSES nad 32 MILLION CATTLE and in 1932 ALONE KULAKS DESTROYED up to 50% OF THE HARVEST in certain Southerrn areas such as Ukraine, hardest hit by the famine. Source- Douglas Tottle- "Fraud, Famine, Fascism", chapter 8
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "According to esteemed Canadian historian Douglas Tottle"
He's not "esteemed." He's a soviet apologist. The causes & reasons for the famine are well known. Stalin's own daughter, Svetlana Alliluyeva said that her father called the famine a myth and "used the grain that could have save his people to buy heavy industrial machinery (all part of his industrial modernization program)."
Even Lavrenti Beria wanted to distance himself from Stalin, after his death.
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 But in answer to your questions, everyone knows Syngman Rhee was a despot. And the sad reality of the cold war is that we supported such "men," as an alternative to "communist domination."
As for the Belgian Congo mess, it's just one more reason why the US had the right idea in declaring independence from European monarchs & their corrupt systems. Btw, it wasn't S. Korea or S. Vietnam (both US allies) who invaded their northern neighbors.
dgonz26868 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Ollie North is an American hero.
BurnBeforeEating 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 And Che, Mao, Castro, Kim Jong Il, and Stalin Weren't?
TheyHearUsNow 10 months ago
@TheyHearUsNow What about Kim Jong Il- the Non Gun Ri massacre and US bombing of Pyongyang aside, have you even heard of the Bodo League Massacre? Look it up
ComradeFlorian31 10 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 no no no, you answer my question first you punk. You critisize Reagan for being a murderer yet you are probably a fan of Che, Stalin, Mao, and Castro who were murderers themselves. They killed over 100,000,000 people.
TheyHearUsNow 10 months ago
@TheyHearUsNow they killed over 100 million people, even if that was true, capitalism has killed 140 million according to The Black Book of Capitalism and White Christianity killed 100 MILLION NATIVE AMERICANS between 1492-1890, according to David Stannard's book "The American Holocaust'
ComradeFlorian31 10 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "even if that were true" Give me a break, where the hell did 77,000,000 Chinese people go during the rein of Mao? What happened to the 2 million starving North Koreans in the 90s? Why are you not questioning your own beliefs based on thes FACTS?
TheyHearUsNow 10 months ago
In Switzerland they have to own guns.
CaptainAmerica5013 1 year ago
couldnt agree more!
jzumbro19 1 year ago
May I ask please,
Why would you fear a registry could be used to confiscate firearms from legal gun owners? The 2nd Amendment protects the confiscation of firearms without due process of law.
KyoNingyo 1 year ago
@KyoNingyo i know, look at DC, and San Francisco, (those are the first two city's to come to my head) they are taking the guns away from people, and some politicians are trying to get the second amendment changed.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
I used to have a carry conceal permit for New York State and personal protection demands private ownership for effective self defence. The criminal element is to well armed to think you are safe without good training and a firearm
KyoNingyo 1 year ago
taking away guns would create a massive and more expansive black Market mostly controlled by Violent street gangs and Mexican Organized crime rings etc so to ban guns would be pointless as it would not totally abolish guns. the issue of those felons they are getting guns from trade shows( open sales and in some states at those sales no back-round check is needed if it is a private sell). the idea that getting guns banned etc will lower crime is 100% false and is a false reality..good video man.
thequeernews 1 year ago
@thequeernews exactly! and it takes the guns away from the people to defend themselves. Criminals openly say that they are in favor of gun control. That says something. lol! thanks for the comment!
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
i can build a gun. easily. no one can take that away. waves~~
crosspecans 1 year ago
Well said!
AvidiaNirvana 1 year ago
@AvidiaNirvana thanks!
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
Great video Evan chaz likes =)\mm
chazdaspazman 1 year ago
@chazdaspazman thanks man!
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
ALL East-European countries with gun laws have lower homocide rates than America, even while their crime rate is about as much or even highter (about 5-6 countries beat America on crime), due to the fact that you can't get a gun in your drawer. in my country, a man was murder, politically. the killer used a knife, as he couldn't get a gun. without wanting to make murder look smaller, that could be why a polital assault in your country takes 6 lives and in my country 1.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
Norway got fewy low gun laws. Sweden, next to it, got much stricter. In sweden, the homocide rate is about 1/2 of Norway. In England, the crime rate is the highest, beating the number 2 with twice as much. but due to their strict gun laws, their homocide rate is one of the lowest of Europe.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 ok.. i just read your comments. Now your comparisons of different country's dosnt work. Their are soooo many other things that play apart of murder rate. You need to find ONE country that had a high murder rate, then restricted guns (in some way) and that murder rate went down. Btw their are ZERO known cases of such an event happening. You need to find ONE country because, lets take a stroll back to science class. You look for evidence in subjects with ZERO VARIABLES. ONLY.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
I guess americans just like killing then. killing is a part of life in America, then. if the homocide rates in the US are highter than any West-european country, that SHOULD make you think. I need a country with a high murder rate? how about the United States of America. countries with gun bans have lower homocide rates than US (except for countries like Mexico, and other countries which are messed up). even countries with more crime.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 like i said in my last comment, so many things play into the homicide rate. Location, other laws, the time, the person in power. their are literally COUNTLESS things that play into it, that is why you cant compare different countries. And did you rally just say that the fact that the crime rate had been going down in Australia for 25 years, and the year they ban guns it rises by over 300% is some areas, and significantly everywhere, and that is just a coincidence? wow!
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
in 1997, private guns were banned in the UK. in the few years after, homocide rates went up. then, homocide rates dropped to one of the lowest of Europe, about half of the US (in statistic, so no BS about US being bigger).
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 this is a article from a widely respected news press stating the direct opposite of what you are claiming...
(sent direct message, due to youtubes URL block.)
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
got yar message, got the article. and you claim that I pick irrelevant numbers. first: all these numbers are from AFTER the gun ban, second, I talk about homocide only. I'd rather have 5 people robbed that 1 person dead. but that's a case of priorities.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 my article clearly supports my claim, the numbers are comparing, ALL violent crimes involving guns, you said that homicide rate went down, this clearly says ALL violent crimes involving guns are currently higher than before the gun ban.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
*rolls eyes* the violent crime rate of England is the highest of Europe, beating number 2 by twice as much (and beating the US by 3.5 times as much)! I'm talking about homocide only! England got a MASSIVE violent crime rate, but their gun MURDER rates are fairly low. look up those, and we will talk on.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 you cant look at one aspect out of hundreds and say that the whole thing is bad, because one of the numbers may support you. which i have never seen. I have shown you several highly respected news press articles that support my arguments. I have seen zero from you.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
your prospect of a crime increase is timely only. you need to get guns OUT of the market. black market? wtf that's were borders are for! how do YOU explain that every single West-european countries got lower homocide rates than the US. are you just more agressieve or may it just be that I'm right? you can't just 'get' a gun if they're illigal.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
and should I be all wrong, if all my numbers mean nothing, then US is **** up. then you can't control blackmarket, then you can't control homocide. then you're about twice as blood-thirsty as Europeans-more, if you're right that gun would LOWER kill rates. man, what a **** country you got there. look at your country. a tool made for death and death only, is part of everyday life. easy to take it and teach that guy at school a lesson...
FireCannon27 1 year ago
small point on ym 1th comment: tell me if my definition of milita is wrong. I'm not english and it quite likely. but I thought a milita was a town's milita, not a army.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
aah, the video... well, let's see. you know my point of view I guess...
first of all: the 2th amandement. I disagree with that guy. I think it's like: 'because a well armed milita (that being the people fighting for their city instead of their county) is necessary to keep the government to be able to control the states (thus, taking away freedom), people have the right to bear arms so they can form a milita. it still supports your point, but I wanted to say it. this was first comment.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@FireCannon27 the Militia is the military force. The first part says that it is important for your country to have a military force to defend your country. The second part says, in addition the right of the people to keep and bear arms. so those people can defend themselves if needed. Which the founders knew that time would come again.
TheConservativeNews 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
my bad then. must be confused... I though hte milia was the defences of the town, not the country. I didn't know that 'milita' and 'army' were the same.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
(second comment) bear in mind though that different interpetations have more than once caused conflict. I don't know if I believe those scientists of you. I could find another claiming differently if i tried.
FireCannon27 1 year ago
@TheConservativeNews
hey, i looked up 'militia', in the cambridge dictionary and it said :'a military force which only operates for some of the time and whose members often have other jobs'. so full-time soldiers (thus, the army) don't count. is it possible that you're wrong? hyperdictionary was even more direct: 'civilians trained as soldiers but not part of the regular army'.
FireCannon27 1 year ago