This Russian take on the assault on Moscow sure beat the US version of '56! My Dad really enjoyed this long version, as we saw it in a San Diego theater in '68 while I was going to SD State Univ. I am not a war/violence junkie, as I was an active anti Vietnam war activist at the time. Not vs. the trigger pullers, but vs. the military/civilian brass that got us into the mess, from LBJ, McNamara on down and the four star brass. I supported the GIs as a flight ops specialist in W. Germany.
@Hereticalable Well Britain i can understand but America is the 'New World' less of a history yet the French have left their mark in the US especially in places like New Orleans
@westnblu Montreal too...credit where it is due by the world's language is English not French. America is mostly a product of Britain (of course there were plenty of Dutch, Germans, Spanish and French there too). Napoleon was a simple tyrant and conqueror - not much different to Hitler in regards to world domination.
@Hereticalable World domination i agree was 1 thing they had in common but therein end the similarities. Napolean was an able general Hitler was not . Waltzed into Paris proclaimed himself Emperor without a shot being fired the French luved him they even named a brandy after him!! LOL There hasnt been an Emperor since the Roman times. Even the English called him Emperor cant recall the English calling Hitler Fuhrer can u? haha
@westnblu Napoleon certainly didn't have the racist and genocidal views of Hitler but the aim of conquering everything was the same. Both men were soldiers but Hitler had good generals he often ignored. As for Emperor's - well Britain's monarchy was technically Imperial for centuries with the largest Empire in history (and Victoria was known as Empress of India). Germany had it's Kaiser (which means Caeser) and Russia had it's Tsars (again named for Caeser).
@Hereticalable Well thanx 4 that didnt know that. About the only thing i was familiar was the month of July being named after him!! LOL Pardon my ignorance but u sometimes get surprised with reading comments posted by knowledgeable ppl as yourself thanx again.
Как же смешны все комментарии такого плана: "Непобедимая французская армия была побеждена ужасной русской зимой, а сами русские солдаты были никчёмными крестьянами". Просто ухахатываюсь с этого.))
@SirChuvak Они считают себя умнее Наполеона. Он не знал , что зима бывает. А они знают. Блестящий ум и все дела. Наполеон уже в сентябре засобирался и писал письма Александру о мире.
@TheMexicanboxer The mistake is invade russia thinking that you can win the war soon. When you invade a large country like russia you got to be pacient. Nappolean and Hitler fall in the same trap, they extended their armys to much and than the lines have broken, and without supplys they couldn't resist to the russian winter.
@cumbas If russia was impossible to invade how come the russians were able to conduct a war in such climate? If the french army was better more equipt it would be able to invade russia with success. Im guessing your russian being how you make it seem like your god given duty to protect its "invincebility" alcolade
@cumbas few ? just a couple of sodiers died in the battle the rest half of million french soldiers forgot their coats in France))) Dont make me laugh))
After just to help you & your "American non-education" ^^ no need to return in a far past of the long history of Russia to find defeats, search in the Modern Age...
@cumbas America has a better education then France. In fact France isn't even in the top 10 ranking. How come every european always attacks the education of Americans.
France is actually one of my favorite countries, but every time i come into contact with a French person they always seem to hate America. What did america do to France other then save its ass. By the way when you say you hate Americans your saying you hate all the countries in S america, central america and N. America.
Stop to know everythings especially the propaganda that you can to read from your USA or an anglo-saxons country LOL
So to finish with you, we saw that you are a non-educated kid (as much more in the USA) but now we can to add also a big arrogant sucker (as all "blind American" on the real world ^^) and a retarded kid :-)
@cumbas How is english a "poor Education" Language? English is known as being one of the hardest languages in the world to both learn or master. French isn't even close to being a hard language. And the purpose for me saying your English is terrible is to tell you that i can hardly understand what sentence you are trying to formulate.
no comparison possible with the richers French or Italian or Spanish or Chinese Mandarin and by away : Vocabulary, give a feeling,etc...
English is just since the end of fhe WW2 the language of monnay (but for a little time again because the Chinese Madarin arrive ^^) and for a shit poor culture and retarded peoples
@cumbas If you hate america get off your computer, turn out you light bulb, get off of youtube, don't use your car, don't use a phone, and don't use the internet. Because they were all american.
But sure not "the USA" that represente persons as you ^^
I love the truth on the History & especially I dont like the arrogant sucker (kid or not kid ^^) non-educated as you especially if vs the evidence these idiots believe that they are educated & "great" ^^
...
For you education again my playlist on the oldest Friendship in the world between 2 democracies France-USA --> /playlist?list=PL4725FA2E43C806DD
Who is in all the History of teh Modern Age the 1st Western Big Power who lost a war vs a Third World country ?
Russia vs Japan (who was a Third Wolrd country in this time) in 1904
Others ?
- The Crimean War (1853-1856) vs France-UK
- The MAIN, the WW1 in 1917 vs Germany and yes never forget that Russia is not a winner of the WW1 in spite of his alliance in the start with France & UK, the winner side in the end
And I dont speak about wars like "Afghanistan" in the 80's because it was out of Russia ^^
So now sorry i stop with you because I'm not here to educate all the non-educated kids as you, especially the American kids because you are too numerous for me in the USA ^^
Do you are others uninteresting & off-topic message like that, retarded kid ?
& YOU, do you can write & speak French or even 1 foreigner (for you) language like I can write & speak English (even bad so I know & I dont care, English is a too poor language for the education of brilliant persons) ?
i'm not certain LOL
And sorry but after the French, I prefer by far learn the Mandarin Chinese, a much more important language for the future ^^
1a) Russian-Japanese war. You are right the war was lost, (one mistake - Japanese army had been equiped not as an army of a "Third world country", but not worse than Russian army.). But that war took place NOT on Russian territory.
2a) Crimean war... Do you know, Russian army fought with old weapon in 1850-th - with the muskets of the times of Napoleonic wars!!! Russian bullets and cannon balls flew at the distance in times (!!!) shorter, than Allied bullets and cannon balls! By the way, in that war took part Russian provincial troops only, no one elite regiment! (on the British sides, for example there were Foot Guards, Rifles, Scott Greys...).
@nomadsaber Yes, I know, but Turkey didn't play any decisive role in that defeat. Even European Allies won mainly due to their superiority in weapons - Russia fought with really "antient" weapon.
@nomadsaber Yes, it was... But I should say all Turkish country was founded on the bones and blood of people, on whose countries turks attacked before...
@cumbas 3a) WW1. Yes, German army, in fact, won the war on Eastern front, but you should remember about 2 (!!!) revolutions in the Russian rear! We saw examples of the countries, who lost wars without death of their country from inside!
@cumbas 4)fin Though I am Russian, I am always irritated, when in France, Russia or anywhere else are told bad things about America - believe me Russian or French enemies are sitting in our governments, parliaments and banks, and sometimes are living on our street...
@brothachiken023 the goal was to force surrender, if napoleon searched to occupy every inch of russia, he would lose the maneuvrability of his armies numbers, becoming vulnerable to an organized insurrection in austria or prussia...
@brothachiken023 try to put what you say into context, i didn't call you a dumbass in the last comment i made did i? besides if i started arguying with you is because you did say something dumbass.
@paintballKid545, over 300,000 French troops participated in the invasion of Russia, the rest of the army were full of foreigners. The Poles were the largest minority.
@LiallisVladik Stanisław Żółkiewski invaded Russia, conquered Moscow, began the Time of Troubles and was praised as a hero in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. There are some exceptions :P
@codrumd Cool story bro. Russians invaded Poland too, and captured Warsaw. Remember the 3 Polish uprising ? which Failed. Ohh and btw, Polish troops which captured Moscow surrendered like pussies, without a fight.
@DJEDzTV You're missing the point, I just proved that Liallis' statement was invalid.Yes 3 polish attempts to regain independence failed, that is true. What is also true is the fact that you weren't alone in that fight, Prussia and Austria were helping you directly or just by sending supplies. Polish soldiers at Moscow surrendered after some (when they weakened Russian tsardom as much as they could) and it wasn't even the point of dispute...
@codrumd Poland never won victories by them selves too, always with help of Lithuanians (in some cases Cossacks) and mercenaries from other countries..I hate proud Poles which sit and spam every Russian video like little trolls, saying how great Poland is and how shit Russia is. We have an amazing history too, we got invaded many times, and managed to keep our borders to this day! I know Poles hate Russians for Katyn and communism, but thats not my problem, i never killed any Poles in Katyn.
@DJEDzTV First of all I don't hate nations, I hate ignorants. Second of all, Poland and Lithuania were a federation state at that time, so I'd consider them as one. And if you'd still want to argue about that, let me put this clear : At the end of XVIIIth century, there was not a single nobleman nor a townsman, nor anyone from the middle class that would speak lithuanian, all of them were polonized. Lithuanian was the language of the peasants in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
@codrumd Cool story bro. I said I hate the proud Poles, I never said i hate Polish nation. There are some Poles which flood the internet with historical nonsense, and spread hate towards Russians. Thats what I hate. I've met so many like that.
@DJEDzTV You seem not to understand my replies. I didn't say you hate anyone, I was talking about myself. Speaking of the polish historical "trolls", I could name as many Russians, Germans, Americans or whatnot doing the same thing. You can't make a sweeping statement like that, it's unfair. And to sum up, dude please, stop with the "cool story bro" thing it's old and uncool, especially when we're discussing serious topics. Peace.
@codrumd I never saw any Russian leaving retarded comments to Polish videos. But i see Poles commenting shit on our vids. And because i can speak Polish, I do understand what they write and it pisses me off, because most of the time its complete bullshit.
@DJEDzTV What saddens me the most though, is the fact that you're being butthurt just because someone repelled the myth about "the invincible russian army". You were a superpower back in XVIII, XIX and half of the XXth century, no ones arguing about that. But you need to accept the fact that those times are over and stop calling others "pussies", that's just lame. Russias a colossus with feet of clay, live with it.
Wow, so the Russians could beat the Persia empires, Napoleon, and Hitler but they couldn't beat the Afghans, now this makes no sense to me at all. But to be fair, neither can my country :(
@LordGeorgeRodney hee not without THE PRUSSIANS wellington had only 36000 men while the prussians had 200 000 men so wellington didn't win the battle the prussians did the british only take the honor of it.
@Oscar35135 sorry you seem to forget that Wellington held the ridge and defeated all French attacks!! Hougemont held and repelled & French attacks all day!
The Imperial Guard was blasted to kingdom come by Royal artillery!!
@Oscar35135 nearly all historical accounts recall wellingtons forces at 60,000-75,000. as well as 45,000-50,000 prussians who fought at waterloo. the war entirely including all battles did amount to more troops but these numbers i believe are accurate for waterloo.
"Poor excuse " for yourself .Ney defeated Wellington at the battle of Pombal and at the battle of Redinha . At Quatres Bras only the arrival of reinforcements enabled Wellington to hold against the French troops far fewer and Quatres Bras was not a victory of the coalition .
Wrong Quatre Bras was a strategic French victory . "Ney was retreating from the disastrous French invasion and fighting rearguard actions." wrong again at the battle of redinha for example Wellington had to use all of its troops to force the French dam. So it's not a French victory of rearguard .
It was still a rearguard action.. and in another rearguard at Foz d'Aronce Ney was beaten badly...
Quatre Bras the Anglo allied held the field. Ligny was the cause of the temporary allied retreat NOT Quatres Bras...
Its as simple as that..
don't forget the battle of Genappe which was British victory where the Life Guard cavalry defeated the French lancers and that was a rearguard action too.. the difference is the whole Waterloo campaign was successful unlike Ney's
Too funny where you see that in a rearguard battle that a total army had to fight this is what happens in Redinha and at Pombal Ney defeated again Wellington . In Quatre Bras the English retreated so it's a strategic victory for the French . You are funny with your bragging about Waterloo because in fact the French army was no longer able to win this war for a long time .
@jeffkodiac Wrong the English retreated AFTER the battle of Ligny was lost...
The French were all gone from Quatre Bras after they had been cleared from the field by British...
So what if the total army had to fight, the French retreated on the battlefield at Redinha in the presence of the English & Portuguese ... in broader perspective France had suffered one of her worst defeats losing 25,000 men trying to invade Portugal (after being at Busaco & at lines at Torres Vedras) ..
Wrong Quatre Bras and Ligny took place in the same time after the battle of Ligny the Prussians were able to retreat without being harassed by the French and at Quatre Bras the coalition never took the position of the French .
"So what if the total army had to fight" so it's not a rearguard battle . You made me laugh with Portugal because the English was helped by the Portuguese army and also the Portuguese population Thus the French had even enough to eat.
LOL! Yes the British trained Portuguese army and the Portuguese people helped to defeat the French invasion. They are our allies since the Siege of Lisbon 1147 & also together Britian & Portugal defeated the Spanish French invasion in 1762
The British were also allies of the Portuguese and the Dutch and Spanish during the first coalition war, this did not prevent the British, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch to be Defeated by the French alone.in this war ..
@jeffkodiac first coalition war? LOL! I don't recall Britain signing any treaty in that and in fact we fought on so that isn't in the British history books.. so why mention it...
"so that isn't in the British history books.. " lol of course the English do not like it contradicts their propaganda but the English and their allies who did not want the creation of the French Republic was well defeated .
@LordGeorgeRodney. you're correct that Quatre Bras is very strategically favorable to the Allies because of the reasons you stated, and Wellington stopped Ney from capturing the town. I think those two good reasons I just stated pretty much cancel each other out, and so the logical and unbiased conclusion would be to call this battle a draw, but it's strategically favorable to the Allies.
@LordGeorgeRodney, if the French had decisively crushed the Prussians at Ligny, then Quatre Bras would have been a strategic French victory. But since that's not the case, and the Prussians retreated with a large portion of their force, it is an Allied strategic victory.
@expertstrategy true but in hindsight Waterloo would never have existed because Napoleon (& Marshalls) would have the opportunity to strike at Wellington a lot sooner & he would have been vaporised off the face of the planet.... but... hindsight!
The Quatres Bras position was held by Wellington and the French had been pushed off the battlefield. Sorry but those are the facts.. The battle was OVER yes... OVER when Wellington heard news of the defeat at Ligny and then withdrew..
thanks to D'Erlon & Ney
Napoleon best sums it up when he heard the 'mess' Ney had made at Quatres Bras..
Wellington has simply taken advantage of as many troops he had, but when he saw that this would change because of the defeat of the Prussians at Ligny he Is retreated so the historical facts are that Quatre Bras was a strategic French victory .
1) At the battle of Quatre Bras, Ney took the farm pireaumont, then the French took over the farm Gémioncourt and farm Petit Pierrepont. The French remained stuck at the farm of Grand Pierrepont. By mid-afternoon the French Defeated the allies on the farm of Grand Pierrepont. Then the French defeated allies in the Bois Bossu , in the charge Brunswick was killed and Wellington narrowly escape capture.
2) Only in the end of the afternoon with the arrival of reinforcements and artillery 2 times larger that enabled the allied repel the French. So of course the allied " taken advantage of many troops" .
"Numbers who cares about numbers" what is funny with the English like you is their enormous hypocrisy .I suspected that you were going to say that the number is not important because the majority of battles won against the French and English and their allies outnumbered .
@jeffkodiac, Quatre Bras was quite strategically favorable to the Allies. I don't see what the French gained from the aftermath of the two battles of Ligny and Quatre Bras. They pretty much gained very little to almost nothing. Napoleon failed to destroy the Prussians as origionally planned, and he even had to send a part of the Imperial Guard to protect his flank from an approaching "enemy", but by the time he discovered tha the enemy were really French soldiers from D'Erlon's Corp....
LGR, I meant to say that the two reasons I stated for both sides in the aftermath of Quatre Bras cancel each other out. Sorry I wasn't being very specific in detail.
@LordGeorgeRodney, Quatre Bras is often viewed as a draw. Are we to say that Eylau was a Russian victory since the French were unable to penetrate through the Russian lines, and Bennigsen decided to withdraw even though he could have stayed there if he wanted to?
Quatre Bras could be argued as a victory for both sides. The French managed to stop Wellington from aiding the Prussians, and he withdrew after the battle was over, leaving the French in control.
@jeffkodiac . ''You are funny with your bragging about Waterloo because in fact the French army was no longer able to win this war for a long time .''
@LordGeorgeRodney learn what history is about and see if you could do even a minute of what this great man achieved and did for his country, you illiterate , dumb fuck!
@9911aleksey Я слышал что в новых учебниках истории украины пишут что под Полтавой шведов разбила украинская армия .Если это так то у меня к вам нет больше никаких вопросов.!
@9911aleksey Really against Russia all Europe has acted, Kutuzov understood that forces are not equal and consequently it has not given the main battle on border of Russia and carried away army of Napoleon deep into Russia conducting small battles направленые on easing of army of Napoleon. Kutuzov's tactics has brought a victory of Russia.
@9911aleksey Not one of the contradictory parties has not won Borodino battle, after battle Kutuzov understood that Russian army should be kept for the future battles and consequently has receded in a consequence having left Moscow having made from Moscow a trap. This strategy was a success. Napoleon thought that having grasped it has won Moscow, but it has appeared not and Napoleon has understood it offering the world of Russia, but Russia only began war.
@9911aleksey Let's look really at events of 1812 of Russian army of Kutuzov the most powerful and strong army of Napoleon in structure of which resisted were representatives of all countries of the won Europe, namely Italians, Spaniards, Poles, Belgians and many other things to the nation. Thus against one army of Russia all Europe was at war.
@9911aleksey Kutuzov has kept Russian army and Russian army per 1814 has entered with a victory over Paris, and Alexander 1 has driven to Paris on a horse presented to it Napoleon. And you name it tactical defeat?
@9911aleksey Yes I became agree a campaign to Russia full breakdown for the French army and loss of authority of Napoleon, having entered on territory of Russia Napoleon thought that Russia will pay the tax and to victual the French army as it was in all countries of the Europe, but there was the return.
Battle under Borodino was not tactical defeat it was tactical reception directed for easing the French army and to entice into a trap-burning Moscow. Kutuzov has forced to recede army of Napoleon on dead road. The French soldiers of a fur-tree of dead horses also were engaged in eating of dead people. At the river Berezina Napoleon has thrown army and ran from Russia.
french and germans blame winter for defeat, you just to ignorant to axept it, there is winter for russians too and its also bad as it is for you but we can still fight because we tougher, if you cant take cold why the hell would you come to russia anw? get a coat and come again.
In 2012 to be executed 200 years to great battle "Borodino". There will be a reconstruction, it will be possible interesting....
Vanyaaynav 1 day ago
This Russian take on the assault on Moscow sure beat the US version of '56! My Dad really enjoyed this long version, as we saw it in a San Diego theater in '68 while I was going to SD State Univ. I am not a war/violence junkie, as I was an active anti Vietnam war activist at the time. Not vs. the trigger pullers, but vs. the military/civilian brass that got us into the mess, from LBJ, McNamara on down and the four star brass. I supported the GIs as a flight ops specialist in W. Germany.
MBDmediaman 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A fantastic documentary about Napoleon Bonaparte and the War of 1812! Watch here
youtube.com/watch?v=7tbHixL3xIc youtube.com/watch?v=FcBf2PNlF64
youtube.com/watch?v=gv5ErRc0kM8
MedDanila 6 days ago
Napolean did wot Hitler couldnt! He @ least entered Moscow
westnblu 1 week ago
@westnblu Moscow wasnt that much of an important city then. St. Petersburg was the capital in those days.
luckyStrike89ru 6 days ago
@luckyStrike89ru ok didnt know that thanx 4 that.
westnblu 6 days ago
@westnblu Germans have conquered Paris at least twice...and neither could touch Britain or American ;o)
Hereticalable 6 days ago
@Hereticalable Well Britain i can understand but America is the 'New World' less of a history yet the French have left their mark in the US especially in places like New Orleans
westnblu 6 days ago
@westnblu Montreal too...credit where it is due by the world's language is English not French. America is mostly a product of Britain (of course there were plenty of Dutch, Germans, Spanish and French there too). Napoleon was a simple tyrant and conqueror - not much different to Hitler in regards to world domination.
Hereticalable 5 days ago
@Hereticalable World domination i agree was 1 thing they had in common but therein end the similarities. Napolean was an able general Hitler was not . Waltzed into Paris proclaimed himself Emperor without a shot being fired the French luved him they even named a brandy after him!! LOL There hasnt been an Emperor since the Roman times. Even the English called him Emperor cant recall the English calling Hitler Fuhrer can u? haha
westnblu 5 days ago
@westnblu Napoleon certainly didn't have the racist and genocidal views of Hitler but the aim of conquering everything was the same. Both men were soldiers but Hitler had good generals he often ignored. As for Emperor's - well Britain's monarchy was technically Imperial for centuries with the largest Empire in history (and Victoria was known as Empress of India). Germany had it's Kaiser (which means Caeser) and Russia had it's Tsars (again named for Caeser).
Hereticalable 5 days ago
@Hereticalable Well thanx 4 that didnt know that. About the only thing i was familiar was the month of July being named after him!! LOL Pardon my ignorance but u sometimes get surprised with reading comments posted by knowledgeable ppl as yourself thanx again.
westnblu 4 days ago
History has taught us that to invade Russia is one giant mistake...
trouzerpants 1 week ago
Как же смешны все комментарии такого плана: "Непобедимая французская армия была побеждена ужасной русской зимой, а сами русские солдаты были никчёмными крестьянами". Просто ухахатываюсь с этого.))
SirChuvak 2 weeks ago
@SirChuvak Они считают себя умнее Наполеона. Он не знал , что зима бывает. А они знают. Блестящий ум и все дела. Наполеон уже в сентябре засобирался и писал письма Александру о мире.
Kazak844 2 weeks ago 2
@Kazak844 Вот правильные вещи говорите! +1
SirChuvak 2 weeks ago
SNOW AGAINST FRECH ARMY
unfukkkmee 2 weeks ago
@unfukkkmee army a decisive factor in the victory over Napoleon winter and expanses of land is of secondary importance
zxzxzxz72 1 week ago
invading russia is always the biggest mistake
TheMexicanboxer 3 weeks ago
@TheMexicanboxer The mistake is invade russia thinking that you can win the war soon. When you invade a large country like russia you got to be pacient. Nappolean and Hitler fall in the same trap, they extended their armys to much and than the lines have broken, and without supplys they couldn't resist to the russian winter.
Boifeicasempre 2 weeks ago 2
@Boifeicasempre you just said exactly what i was thinking
TheMexicanboxer 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
genWathier 3 weeks ago
Yes, correct. Empires built on bones and blood.
Czars built empire on russian bones.
Millions of russians dies and dying for the empire.
nomadsaber 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber and Brits always used teddy bears instead of soldiers - every empire had people that died for its glory.
Psyhozard 3 weeks ago
number 1 rule of war. Dont invade russia.
ShootForFun824 4 weeks ago
@ShootForFun824 Russia isn't infuckingvincible shithead.
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas I do know that the winter has destroyed many armies in the past. Its still not invinceble.
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
?????? LOL
...And it was the case here in the Napoleonic Age
Napoleon said "The bigger Russian General is the General Winter" (as the bigger English General always was the General Channel... Except in 1066 ^^)
The 2sd French Grande Armée saw the biggest part of his soldiers killed by the winter & by the famine & very few actually by the Russian Army...
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas If russia was impossible to invade how come the russians were able to conduct a war in such climate? If the french army was better more equipt it would be able to invade russia with success. Im guessing your russian being how you make it seem like your god given duty to protect its "invincebility" alcolade
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
@cumbas few ? just a couple of sodiers died in the battle the rest half of million french soldiers forgot their coats in France))) Dont make me laugh))
Psyhozard 3 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
1a)
After just to help you & your "American non-education" ^^ no need to return in a far past of the long history of Russia to find defeats, search in the Modern Age...
cumbas 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
@cumbas America has a better education then France. In fact France isn't even in the top 10 ranking. How come every european always attacks the education of Americans.
France is actually one of my favorite countries, but every time i come into contact with a French person they always seem to hate America. What did america do to France other then save its ass. By the way when you say you hate Americans your saying you hate all the countries in S america, central america and N. America.
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
AHAHAHAHAH funny kid
Stop to know everythings especially the propaganda that you can to read from your USA or an anglo-saxons country LOL
So to finish with you, we saw that you are a non-educated kid (as much more in the USA) but now we can to add also a big arrogant sucker (as all "blind American" on the real world ^^) and a retarded kid :-)
Bye bye ^^
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas How is english a "poor Education" Language? English is known as being one of the hardest languages in the world to both learn or master. French isn't even close to being a hard language. And the purpose for me saying your English is terrible is to tell you that i can hardly understand what sentence you are trying to formulate.
paintballKid545 3 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
Of course a such poor language :-)
no comparison possible with the richers French or Italian or Spanish or Chinese Mandarin and by away : Vocabulary, give a feeling,etc...
English is just since the end of fhe WW2 the language of monnay (but for a little time again because the Chinese Madarin arrive ^^) and for a shit poor culture and retarded peoples
The whole world know that why you not ? ^^
cumbas 3 weeks ago
@cumbas
Learn it before you diss it, bro.
Bigbleachy 3 weeks ago
@cumbas Why do you hate americans? Why? Thats all I have to say.
paintballKid545 3 weeks ago
@cumbas If you hate america get off your computer, turn out you light bulb, get off of youtube, don't use your car, don't use a phone, and don't use the internet. Because they were all american.
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
I dont hate the USA, oh no by far!!
I like even!!
But sure not "the USA" that represente persons as you ^^
I love the truth on the History & especially I dont like the arrogant sucker (kid or not kid ^^) non-educated as you especially if vs the evidence these idiots believe that they are educated & "great" ^^
...
For you education again my playlist on the oldest Friendship in the world between 2 democracies France-USA --> /playlist?list=PL4725FA2E43C806DD
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas About Napoleon I should say he was a greatest commander!... I dislike his actions at Waterloo only...
genWathier 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paintballKid545
You should learn a little better the History of Russia, non-educated American kid (like usually with the big part of the kids from this country ^^)
Mother Nature and the General Winter especially in Russia always was invincible in the past but especially not Russia...
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
2a)
OK I help your "non-education" again ^^
Who is in all the History of teh Modern Age the 1st Western Big Power who lost a war vs a Third World country ?
Russia vs Japan (who was a Third Wolrd country in this time) in 1904
Others ?
- The Crimean War (1853-1856) vs France-UK
- The MAIN, the WW1 in 1917 vs Germany and yes never forget that Russia is not a winner of the WW1 in spite of his alliance in the start with France & UK, the winner side in the end
cumbas 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@paintballKid545
3a-end)
etc...
And I dont speak about wars like "Afghanistan" in the 80's because it was out of Russia ^^
So now sorry i stop with you because I'm not here to educate all the non-educated kids as you, especially the American kids because you are too numerous for me in the USA ^^
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas You have horrible english. I probably have better french then you have english.
paintballKid545 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
cumbas 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paintballKid545
And? LOL
Do you are others uninteresting & off-topic message like that, retarded kid ?
& YOU, do you can write & speak French or even 1 foreigner (for you) language like I can write & speak English (even bad so I know & I dont care, English is a too poor language for the education of brilliant persons) ?
i'm not certain LOL
And sorry but after the French, I prefer by far learn the Mandarin Chinese, a much more important language for the future ^^
cumbas 4 weeks ago
@cumbas
1a) Russian-Japanese war. You are right the war was lost, (one mistake - Japanese army had been equiped not as an army of a "Third world country", but not worse than Russian army.). But that war took place NOT on Russian territory.
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@cumbas
2a) Crimean war... Do you know, Russian army fought with old weapon in 1850-th - with the muskets of the times of Napoleonic wars!!! Russian bullets and cannon balls flew at the distance in times (!!!) shorter, than Allied bullets and cannon balls! By the way, in that war took part Russian provincial troops only, no one elite regiment! (on the British sides, for example there were Foot Guards, Rifles, Scott Greys...).
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@genWathier
well, stupid Russia went to war against Turkey.
nomadsaber 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber Russia would be stupid in a case only, if it lost this war. But it won))
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber In any case I didn't understund your comment - what war did you mean?
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@genWathier
If you know Russia lost Crimean war.
nomadsaber 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber Yes, I know, but Turkey didn't play any decisive role in that defeat. Even European Allies won mainly due to their superiority in weapons - Russia fought with really "antient" weapon.
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@genWathier
so was inappropriately attack on Turkey
nomadsaber 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber Yes, it was... But I should say all Turkish country was founded on the bones and blood of people, on whose countries turks attacked before...
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@nomadsaber and won almost every time for like 10 times))
Psyhozard 3 weeks ago
@cumbas 3a) WW1. Yes, German army, in fact, won the war on Eastern front, but you should remember about 2 (!!!) revolutions in the Russian rear! We saw examples of the countries, who lost wars without death of their country from inside!
genWathier 3 weeks ago
@cumbas 4)fin Though I am Russian, I am always irritated, when in France, Russia or anywhere else are told bad things about America - believe me Russian or French enemies are sitting in our governments, parliaments and banks, and sometimes are living on our street...
genWathier 3 weeks ago
LOL Poland...the question is, does it blend?
Luchik44 1 month ago
Был чудный,дивный месяц март летели с юга птицы,а в это время Бонапарт,а в это время Бонапарт переходил границу! Скоро 200 лет битве за Москву 1812г.
fomka39 1 month ago
Napoleon broke his teeth on Russia. Alexander 1 entered Paris as a winner!
DJEDzTV 1 month ago
@DJEDzTV With numerous allly, bandes de pleutres !
benjiAkatosh 1 week ago
stupidest mistake ever. The Grand Army could have conquered Russia if it weren't for the winter
brothachiken023 1 month ago
@brothachiken023 the goal was to force surrender, if napoleon searched to occupy every inch of russia, he would lose the maneuvrability of his armies numbers, becoming vulnerable to an organized insurrection in austria or prussia...
boss180888 1 month ago
@boss180888 when i said conquered, i didn't mean to "occupy every inch of Russia", it was meant to mean to force them to surrender dumbass
brothachiken023 1 month ago
@brothachiken023 well that's what conquer means, deal with it. an you just quoted me back, what kind of moron tries to pass that as making any sense?
boss180888 1 month ago
@boss180888 a moron that has a Master's degree in Bio-molecular Engineering, try to get that degree
brothachiken023 1 month ago
@brothachiken023 oh that makes perfect sense.
boss180888 4 weeks ago
@boss180888 don't call a person a dumbass before you actually know what they're made of
brothachiken023 3 weeks ago
@brothachiken023 try to put what you say into context, i didn't call you a dumbass in the last comment i made did i? besides if i started arguying with you is because you did say something dumbass.
boss180888 3 weeks ago
@boss180888 stfu you stupid retard
brothachiken023 3 weeks ago
@brothachiken023 false u need to learn history better
visiblechunk 1 month ago
@visiblechunk actually you need to buddy
brothachiken023 1 month ago
@juultjuh99 Oh oui, merci beacoup!
tnut28356 2 months ago in playlist Napoleon Bonaparte - Road To Moscow
Can anyone tell me the name of the march that starts at 7:29 ? It sounds so triumphant.
tnut28356 2 months ago
@tnut28356 La victoire est a nous.
juultjuh99 2 months ago
Ah, never mind. The question I asked you was pretty stupid with a very obvious answer.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
does anyone know how many of frances troops took place in the total invasion
paintballKid545 3 months ago
@paintballKid545, over 300,000 French troops participated in the invasion of Russia, the rest of the army were full of foreigners. The Poles were the largest minority.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@expertstrategy Do you know how many men were in the total french army
paintballKid545 2 months ago
@paintballKid545, the total number was 600,000 men or slightly more.
expertstrategy 2 months ago
@expertstrategy Thank you
paintballKid545 2 months ago
@expertstrategy No, there was about 700,000 men in that army..
Mort2472 2 months ago
@paintballKid545 yes
paintballKid545 1 month ago
Napoleon's Invasion of Russia and he lost,
Hitler's invasion of Russia and he lost
Before invasion they were great persons,
After Russia, both have badly finished the destiny
LiallisVladik 3 months ago
@LiallisVladik Stanisław Żółkiewski invaded Russia, conquered Moscow, began the Time of Troubles and was praised as a hero in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. There are some exceptions :P
codrumd 2 months ago
@codrumd Cool story bro. Russians invaded Poland too, and captured Warsaw. Remember the 3 Polish uprising ? which Failed. Ohh and btw, Polish troops which captured Moscow surrendered like pussies, without a fight.
DJEDzTV 1 month ago
@DJEDzTV You're missing the point, I just proved that Liallis' statement was invalid.Yes 3 polish attempts to regain independence failed, that is true. What is also true is the fact that you weren't alone in that fight, Prussia and Austria were helping you directly or just by sending supplies. Polish soldiers at Moscow surrendered after some (when they weakened Russian tsardom as much as they could) and it wasn't even the point of dispute...
codrumd 1 month ago
@codrumd Poland never won victories by them selves too, always with help of Lithuanians (in some cases Cossacks) and mercenaries from other countries..I hate proud Poles which sit and spam every Russian video like little trolls, saying how great Poland is and how shit Russia is. We have an amazing history too, we got invaded many times, and managed to keep our borders to this day! I know Poles hate Russians for Katyn and communism, but thats not my problem, i never killed any Poles in Katyn.
DJEDzTV 1 month ago
@DJEDzTV First of all I don't hate nations, I hate ignorants. Second of all, Poland and Lithuania were a federation state at that time, so I'd consider them as one. And if you'd still want to argue about that, let me put this clear : At the end of XVIIIth century, there was not a single nobleman nor a townsman, nor anyone from the middle class that would speak lithuanian, all of them were polonized. Lithuanian was the language of the peasants in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
codrumd 1 month ago
@codrumd Cool story bro. I said I hate the proud Poles, I never said i hate Polish nation. There are some Poles which flood the internet with historical nonsense, and spread hate towards Russians. Thats what I hate. I've met so many like that.
DJEDzTV 1 month ago
@DJEDzTV You seem not to understand my replies. I didn't say you hate anyone, I was talking about myself. Speaking of the polish historical "trolls", I could name as many Russians, Germans, Americans or whatnot doing the same thing. You can't make a sweeping statement like that, it's unfair. And to sum up, dude please, stop with the "cool story bro" thing it's old and uncool, especially when we're discussing serious topics. Peace.
codrumd 1 month ago
@codrumd I never saw any Russian leaving retarded comments to Polish videos. But i see Poles commenting shit on our vids. And because i can speak Polish, I do understand what they write and it pisses me off, because most of the time its complete bullshit.
P.S I like cool story bro ))
DJEDzTV 1 month ago
@DJEDzTV What saddens me the most though, is the fact that you're being butthurt just because someone repelled the myth about "the invincible russian army". You were a superpower back in XVIII, XIX and half of the XXth century, no ones arguing about that. But you need to accept the fact that those times are over and stop calling others "pussies", that's just lame. Russias a colossus with feet of clay, live with it.
codrumd 1 month ago
Wow, so the Russians could beat the Persia empires, Napoleon, and Hitler but they couldn't beat the Afghans, now this makes no sense to me at all. But to be fair, neither can my country :(
TheDannyboy55 3 months ago
i have read about him and after that i really love him. i dont love him like a gay but he is a genius
Oscar35135 3 months ago
tommat00 there is no rules like that read history books not propaganda.
Napoleon is a genius
Oscar35135 3 months ago
Lordgeorgeorgerodney Read history idiot you are a epic fail fuck you
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@Oscar35135 Napoleon lost to Wellington
read history he lost in the end!
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney hee not without THE PRUSSIANS wellington had only 36000 men while the prussians had 200 000 men so wellington didn't win the battle the prussians did the british only take the honor of it.
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@Oscar35135 sorry you seem to forget that Wellington held the ridge and defeated all French attacks!! Hougemont held and repelled & French attacks all day!
The Imperial Guard was blasted to kingdom come by Royal artillery!!
Loser!
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@Oscar35135 nearly all historical accounts recall wellingtons forces at 60,000-75,000. as well as 45,000-50,000 prussians who fought at waterloo. the war entirely including all battles did amount to more troops but these numbers i believe are accurate for waterloo.
m1grand70 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
Napoleon not lost to wellington but against a coalition of country and Wellignton lost to Ney .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac Poor excuse ..
Really ? Not at Waterloo he didn't
Ney was thrown off Quatres Bras field & never retook it..
: D
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
"Poor excuse " for yourself .Ney defeated Wellington at the battle of Pombal and at the battle of Redinha . At Quatres Bras only the arrival of reinforcements enabled Wellington to hold against the French troops far fewer and Quatres Bras was not a victory of the coalition .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac
LOL! Qautres Bras in terms of the battle was a tactical victory
Ney was driven from the field lost his ground and left Wellington in possession of the field.
Ney was retreating from the disastrous French invasion and fighting rearguard actions. He suffered a defeat in the retreat at Foz d'Aronce...
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
Wrong Quatre Bras was a strategic French victory . "Ney was retreating from the disastrous French invasion and fighting rearguard actions." wrong again at the battle of redinha for example Wellington had to use all of its troops to force the French dam. So it's not a French victory of rearguard .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac LOL!!
It was still a rearguard action.. and in another rearguard at Foz d'Aronce Ney was beaten badly...
Quatre Bras the Anglo allied held the field. Ligny was the cause of the temporary allied retreat NOT Quatres Bras...
Its as simple as that..
don't forget the battle of Genappe which was British victory where the Life Guard cavalry defeated the French lancers and that was a rearguard action too.. the difference is the whole Waterloo campaign was successful unlike Ney's
: )
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
Too funny where you see that in a rearguard battle that a total army had to fight this is what happens in Redinha and at Pombal Ney defeated again Wellington . In Quatre Bras the English retreated so it's a strategic victory for the French . You are funny with your bragging about Waterloo because in fact the French army was no longer able to win this war for a long time .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac Wrong the English retreated AFTER the battle of Ligny was lost...
The French were all gone from Quatre Bras after they had been cleared from the field by British...
So what if the total army had to fight, the French retreated on the battlefield at Redinha in the presence of the English & Portuguese ... in broader perspective France had suffered one of her worst defeats losing 25,000 men trying to invade Portugal (after being at Busaco & at lines at Torres Vedras) ..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
Wrong Quatre Bras and Ligny took place in the same time after the battle of Ligny the Prussians were able to retreat without being harassed by the French and at Quatre Bras the coalition never took the position of the French .
"So what if the total army had to fight" so it's not a rearguard battle . You made me laugh with Portugal because the English was helped by the Portuguese army and also the Portuguese population Thus the French had even enough to eat.
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac
LOL! Yes the British trained Portuguese army and the Portuguese people helped to defeat the French invasion. They are our allies since the Siege of Lisbon 1147 & also together Britian & Portugal defeated the Spanish French invasion in 1762
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
The British were also allies of the Portuguese and the Dutch and Spanish during the first coalition war, this did not prevent the British, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch to be Defeated by the French alone.in this war ..
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac first coalition war? LOL! I don't recall Britain signing any treaty in that and in fact we fought on so that isn't in the British history books.. so why mention it...
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LordGeorgeRodney
"so that isn't in the British history books.. " lol of course the English do not like it contradicts their propaganda but the English and their allies who did not want the creation of the French Republic was well defeated .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney. you're correct that Quatre Bras is very strategically favorable to the Allies because of the reasons you stated, and Wellington stopped Ney from capturing the town. I think those two good reasons I just stated pretty much cancel each other out, and so the logical and unbiased conclusion would be to call this battle a draw, but it's strategically favorable to the Allies.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@expertstrategy thank you expert I agree entirely..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, do you agree with all of my comments or just the one on top. I'm confused.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@expertstrategy errr... most of them..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, I see.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, so you acknowledge that Quatre Bras is a draw?
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@expertstrategy yes indeed but with an allied advantage..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, true.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, if the French had decisively crushed the Prussians at Ligny, then Quatre Bras would have been a strategic French victory. But since that's not the case, and the Prussians retreated with a large portion of their force, it is an Allied strategic victory.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@expertstrategy true but in hindsight Waterloo would never have existed because Napoleon (& Marshalls) would have the opportunity to strike at Wellington a lot sooner & he would have been vaporised off the face of the planet.... but... hindsight!
LordGeorgeRodney 2 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, ah, yes, I never thought it about it that way.
expertstrategy 2 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney Quatre Bras is a French strategic victory.
juultjuh99 2 months ago
@juultjuh99 read previous comments
LordGeorgeRodney 2 months ago
@jeffkodiac
The Quatres Bras position was held by Wellington and the French had been pushed off the battlefield. Sorry but those are the facts.. The battle was OVER yes... OVER when Wellington heard news of the defeat at Ligny and then withdrew..
thanks to D'Erlon & Ney
Napoleon best sums it up when he heard the 'mess' Ney had made at Quatres Bras..
"You have lost France"
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
Wellington has simply taken advantage of as many troops he had, but when he saw that this would change because of the defeat of the Prussians at Ligny he Is retreated so the historical facts are that Quatre Bras was a strategic French victory .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac wtf?! Take advantage of as many troops?
What has that got to do with it? Are you saying the Russians were defeated by Germany in WWII?
you are forgetting the fact it was the French who were defeated in battle of Quatre Bras and the Anglo allies under Wellington held the field
Funny victory if your a Frenchman ! Not to mention arguably strategically it was an allied success because the Prussians were not annihilated
And the outcome of Waterloo might have been different
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
1) At the battle of Quatre Bras, Ney took the farm pireaumont, then the French took over the farm Gémioncourt and farm Petit Pierrepont. The French remained stuck at the farm of Grand Pierrepont. By mid-afternoon the French Defeated the allies on the farm of Grand Pierrepont. Then the French defeated allies in the Bois Bossu , in the charge Brunswick was killed and Wellington narrowly escape capture.
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
2) Only in the end of the afternoon with the arrival of reinforcements and artillery 2 times larger that enabled the allied repel the French. So of course the allied " taken advantage of many troops" .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac booo hooo!!
Numbers who cares about numbers... stop making excuses
At Barossa a single British division with Portuguese defeated 2 French divisions ..
at Battles of Sabugal & Fuentes the French outnumbered the Anglo Portuguese but we still won
: )
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
"Numbers who cares about numbers" what is funny with the English like you is their enormous hypocrisy .I suspected that you were going to say that the number is not important because the majority of battles won against the French and English and their allies outnumbered .
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac precisely it's balanced 50/50!
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LordGeorgeRodney
"it's balanced 50/50! " What you say is false in 70 % of the battle between the allies and the French the allies were outnumbered ..
jeffkodiac 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac, Quatre Bras was quite strategically favorable to the Allies. I don't see what the French gained from the aftermath of the two battles of Ligny and Quatre Bras. They pretty much gained very little to almost nothing. Napoleon failed to destroy the Prussians as origionally planned, and he even had to send a part of the Imperial Guard to protect his flank from an approaching "enemy", but by the time he discovered tha the enemy were really French soldiers from D'Erlon's Corp....
expertstrategy 3 months ago
....his postponment of the attack of the Imperial Guard really destroyed his final chance to deliver the coup d'grace and finish off the Prussians.
The only real thing the French achieved at Quatre Bras, was by stopping Wellington from supporting Blucher.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
LGR, I meant to say that the two reasons I stated for both sides in the aftermath of Quatre Bras cancel each other out. Sorry I wasn't being very specific in detail.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney, Quatre Bras is often viewed as a draw. Are we to say that Eylau was a Russian victory since the French were unable to penetrate through the Russian lines, and Bennigsen decided to withdraw even though he could have stayed there if he wanted to?
Quatre Bras could be argued as a victory for both sides. The French managed to stop Wellington from aiding the Prussians, and he withdrew after the battle was over, leaving the French in control.
cont.
expertstrategy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jeffkodiac . ''You are funny with your bragging about Waterloo because in fact the French army was no longer able to win this war for a long time .''
Really then why did Napoleon wage it..
Nice excuse.. : )
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@jeffkodiac I must also mention the skirmish at Genappe before Waterloo where the French Lancers were swiftly defeated by the British Life Guards.
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
Napoleon in Egypt
epic fail
Napoleon v Britain
epic fail
Napoleon v Russia
epic fail
Napoleon v Wellington
epic fail..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney learn what history is about and see if you could do even a minute of what this great man achieved and did for his country, you illiterate , dumb fuck!
KingCorsica13 3 months ago
@KingCorsica13
yeah lose in the end.. nevermind..
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@KingCorsica13 i am not against this great man im with him idiot
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@KingCorsica13 its not i who talk crap about him but others have
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney
France > England
LONDON = BAD CITY = PARIS BEAUTIFIFUL CITY , so jalous england
MonsieurMouk 3 months ago
@MonsieurMouk
really I seem to think we won
Look at Fashoda 1898 when France tried to take on the British empire.
(AGAIN)
EPIC FAIL!
LordGeorgeRodney 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney you are epic fail the british could never had won without ausstria, prussia and russia so fuck you
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@MonsieurMouk yes paris is Beautiful
Oscar35135 3 months ago
@LordGeorgeRodney dont talk shit on the emperor
yinghan307 3 months ago
Napolean=fat Hitler=fatter
thebattery100 3 months ago
What is George Costanza doing in that white suit @0:48?
Wadensten 3 months ago
Has nobody heard of the unofficial rules of war? I'll state the first two.
1.) Don't march on Moscow. Don't EVER march on Moscow.
2.) Don't f*ck the Russians because no matter who you are in Russia, Russians f*ck you.
tommat00 3 months ago
@9911aleksey Я слышал что в новых учебниках истории украины пишут что под Полтавой шведов разбила украинская армия .Если это так то у меня к вам нет больше никаких вопросов.!
Vanyaaynav 3 months ago
@9911aleksey Really against Russia all Europe has acted, Kutuzov understood that forces are not equal and consequently it has not given the main battle on border of Russia and carried away army of Napoleon deep into Russia conducting small battles направленые on easing of army of Napoleon. Kutuzov's tactics has brought a victory of Russia.
Vanyaaynav 3 months ago
what's the name of the music at 7:32?
coerdelion13 4 months ago
@9911aleksey
spectacular battle scenes here; zappiss uploads great clips
slizzler1 4 months ago
@9911aleksey Not one of the contradictory parties has not won Borodino battle, after battle Kutuzov understood that Russian army should be kept for the future battles and consequently has receded in a consequence having left Moscow having made from Moscow a trap. This strategy was a success. Napoleon thought that having grasped it has won Moscow, but it has appeared not and Napoleon has understood it offering the world of Russia, but Russia only began war.
Vanyaaynav 4 months ago
@9911aleksey Let's look really at events of 1812 of Russian army of Kutuzov the most powerful and strong army of Napoleon in structure of which resisted were representatives of all countries of the won Europe, namely Italians, Spaniards, Poles, Belgians and many other things to the nation. Thus against one army of Russia all Europe was at war.
Vanyaaynav 4 months ago
@9911aleksey Kutuzov has kept Russian army and Russian army per 1814 has entered with a victory over Paris, and Alexander 1 has driven to Paris on a horse presented to it Napoleon. And you name it tactical defeat?
Vanyaaynav 4 months ago
@9911aleksey Yes I became agree a campaign to Russia full breakdown for the French army and loss of authority of Napoleon, having entered on territory of Russia Napoleon thought that Russia will pay the tax and to victual the French army as it was in all countries of the Europe, but there was the return.
Vanyaaynav 4 months ago
notice how the top comment has nothing to do with the video
Ethenumber 4 months ago
Battle under Borodino was not tactical defeat it was tactical reception directed for easing the French army and to entice into a trap-burning Moscow. Kutuzov has forced to recede army of Napoleon on dead road. The French soldiers of a fur-tree of dead horses also were engaged in eating of dead people. At the river Berezina Napoleon has thrown army and ran from Russia.
Vanyaaynav 4 months ago
french and germans blame winter for defeat, you just to ignorant to axept it, there is winter for russians too and its also bad as it is for you but we can still fight because we tougher, if you cant take cold why the hell would you come to russia anw? get a coat and come again.
hellagesoon 4 months ago
Vive le Napoléon de l'Empereur! Vive la France et l'Amérique! BAISE RUSSIE!
TheIceman567 4 months ago
@TheIceman567 veut tu une autre guerre tapette?
dimax997 4 months ago
@dimax997 Apportez Chienne la Russie ne ferait que perdre!
TheIceman567 4 months ago