If you look at this video and photos of the damage afterwards there is no way a 757 flew into the pentagon. The hole was too small, there was no wreckage on the outside lawn, and it would've had so much fuel that the pentagon would've been burning for days. Plus the most secure building on the planet all of sudden had no video evidence of the plane crashing thats bull!!
..you can see the plane clearly behind the concrete block...you only see it for a split second as it is moving at 500 mph..it looks small simply becuase the pentagon is huge and it is 300m plus from the camera to the plane (at least)...the damage at the pentagon is totally consistent with a plane crash..they found airline wreckage everywhere and identified passengers bodies ( hijackers inc ) inside....duh..>!! wake up
@mastermatt1717 Looks more like a missile. I've watched multiple video's of the same shot and I see the same thing. The head is far too thin to be and 747 or any plane really. It's extremely thin. Like a missile head. Consider the possibilities. International terrorists? Hmph....idk about it.
What you saw at :25 was a previous frame with nothing amiss, with a small silver dash added onto the screen to look like it's a missile. Feel free and tell me I'm wrong, but if you do, also explain this:
Why then are there many other versions of this video on the internet, with the same thing happening, but with a different looking (larger/smaller) missile in it? It's easy: Because every one of these missiles were ADDED to the video.
All the shadows on the film previous to the silver streak are pointing down and to the right of the camera. The moment that silver streak is on screen, given the direction of the other shadows, wouldn't its shadow have been cast onto the part of the lawn off the frame? Also, I haven't the other films; but couldn't the differences in size, you mentioned, be accounted for by different vantage points and camera lenses? I dunno...I'm just courting skepticism for its own sake, not taking sides.
Alright the video was definitely edited, and not because of the retarded 'light post' reason. I'm just going to leave that stupid comment alone.
First, start by watching where the smoke cloud towards the end casts its shadow on the grass. That'll give you a perspective as to where...
Well, next look at the frame at :25. Cruise missiles are large, usually weighing about a ton and a half. The size of a small car. Now, try to find the missile's shadow.
wow! I'm now more convinced that something is definately not right about this whole "plane hitting the pentagon" thing. Sure this video may have been edited but it doesnt changes anything on what is shown hitting the building as it can be seen that it was definately NOT a plane that hit the pentagon and causing the explosion!
dumbasses. if you don't know anything about photography or how cctv works, just stfu. do you think cctv is capable of 1/1200 shutter speed? if you have digital camera, try to take a racing car with 1/2 sec. and see what happens.
The interesting thing is how at 26 when you first see the explosion, you can see what looks like the trail of a missile, and then its gone in the next frame. Though I may be wrong but I think missile trails last a bit longer than 1 second. Though if it was the Governments doing, why damage the pentagon? If its part of a military conspiracy thats the LAST thing you want damaged.
If you look at this video and photos of the damage afterwards there is no way a 757 flew into the pentagon. The hole was too small, there was no wreckage on the outside lawn, and it would've had so much fuel that the pentagon would've been burning for days. Plus the most secure building on the planet all of sudden had no video evidence of the plane crashing thats bull!!
GodsChoice221 1 year ago
lens flare
bottle2lip 2 years ago
..you can see the plane clearly behind the concrete block...you only see it for a split second as it is moving at 500 mph..it looks small simply becuase the pentagon is huge and it is 300m plus from the camera to the plane (at least)...the damage at the pentagon is totally consistent with a plane crash..they found airline wreckage everywhere and identified passengers bodies ( hijackers inc ) inside....duh..>!! wake up
jamestampere 4 years ago
Who do they think we are? Thick heads? Looks more like a helicoper... SHOW THE WHOLE VID
mastermatt1717 5 years ago
@mastermatt1717 Looks more like a missile. I've watched multiple video's of the same shot and I see the same thing. The head is far too thin to be and 747 or any plane really. It's extremely thin. Like a missile head. Consider the possibilities. International terrorists? Hmph....idk about it.
recipeace15 1 year ago
When I pause at the point that the object comes into view, the front of that is way to small for a boeing 757, maybe concorde but not a 757.
wewillwinit6times 5 years ago
have you ever seen a 747 they are pretty big,even when compared to a big building like the pentagon,the object shown was WAY to small to be a 747
pestilentfrost 5 years ago
first time i really could see the plane before strucking into the building.
there was no conspiracy.
McEgger288 5 years ago
What you saw at :25 was a previous frame with nothing amiss, with a small silver dash added onto the screen to look like it's a missile. Feel free and tell me I'm wrong, but if you do, also explain this:
Why then are there many other versions of this video on the internet, with the same thing happening, but with a different looking (larger/smaller) missile in it? It's easy: Because every one of these missiles were ADDED to the video.
nymersic 5 years ago
All the shadows on the film previous to the silver streak are pointing down and to the right of the camera. The moment that silver streak is on screen, given the direction of the other shadows, wouldn't its shadow have been cast onto the part of the lawn off the frame? Also, I haven't the other films; but couldn't the differences in size, you mentioned, be accounted for by different vantage points and camera lenses? I dunno...I'm just courting skepticism for its own sake, not taking sides.
Protean213 5 years ago
Alright the video was definitely edited, and not because of the retarded 'light post' reason. I'm just going to leave that stupid comment alone.
First, start by watching where the smoke cloud towards the end casts its shadow on the grass. That'll give you a perspective as to where...
Well, next look at the frame at :25. Cruise missiles are large, usually weighing about a ton and a half. The size of a small car. Now, try to find the missile's shadow.
It doesn't exist.
nymersic 5 years ago
wow! I'm now more convinced that something is definately not right about this whole "plane hitting the pentagon" thing. Sure this video may have been edited but it doesnt changes anything on what is shown hitting the building as it can be seen that it was definately NOT a plane that hit the pentagon and causing the explosion!
BillyHub 5 years ago
Landed like United 93.
lostprophet86 5 years ago
Well, if American Airlines Flight 77 didn´t hit the Pentagon, where did it go ?
Pedrosmp 5 years ago
this video is edited you can see that by watching the light post on the left side of the screen.
bootkiller 5 years ago
this video is edited you can see that by watching the light post on the left side of the screen.
bootkiller 5 years ago
this video is edited you can see that by watching the light post on the left side of the screen.
bootkiller 5 years ago
its not a light post dummy its a gate arm that lowered to let the car in the beginning
kmcknight 5 years ago
How the hell can u tell if its a missle or plane, it happens to quickly, pobably a missle coz of the size of destruction
cghv 5 years ago
just a big mindfuck
BigWhoop79 5 years ago
That was a missile. It was to small to be a jet.
rocker524 5 years ago
dumbasses. if you don't know anything about photography or how cctv works, just stfu. do you think cctv is capable of 1/1200 shutter speed? if you have digital camera, try to take a racing car with 1/2 sec. and see what happens.
2tae100 5 years ago
The interesting thing is how at 26 when you first see the explosion, you can see what looks like the trail of a missile, and then its gone in the next frame. Though I may be wrong but I think missile trails last a bit longer than 1 second. Though if it was the Governments doing, why damage the pentagon? If its part of a military conspiracy thats the LAST thing you want damaged.
Buccura 5 years ago
Nope no plane thats a missile!!
eddiemperor 5 years ago
not a fucking plane... pisses me off
V4D3R 5 years ago
You're a loon.
SCReuter 5 years ago
you're a dickwad
V4D3R 5 years ago
looks to swmall to be a jumbo jet!
bobandkj 5 years ago
THE ILLUMINATI WILL BE DESTROYED.
FUCKING DEVILS DONT KNOW WHATS COMING!
Oobe 5 years ago
00:25
aminakoyum 5 years ago