"What about women or men that are infertile? Should they also not be allowed to adopt...?" Anyone has to be a complete fool to fall for this "argument." You don't understand the difference between Design vs. Defect: Only a male & female were designed to have children, but NOT EVEN ONE homosexual couple can have children. That's completely different than someone who has a reproductive defect. NORMAL sex is about pleasure & procreation and homosexuals can only have a warped variation of it.
Anal sex results in fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections. The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexuals as a result of anal intercourse is alarming: Anal Cancer, Chlamydia, trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Herpes simplex, HIV, HPV, Isospora belli, Microsporidia, Gonorrhea, Hep B/C & Syphilis.
"The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexuals as a result of anal intercourse is alarming: Anal Cancer, Chlamydia, trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Herpes simplex, HIV, HPV, Isospora belli, Microsporidia, Gonorrhea, Hep B/C & Syphilis."
Many if of those have the same percentage or higher rates of transmition in hetro couples. If you practice safe sex, ie. wear a condom the risk is reduced greatly.
Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids. Other physical problems associated with anal intercourse are hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma and retained foreign bodies.
"Other physical problems associated with anal intercourse are hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma and retained foreign bodies."
Agreed however if someone wishes to take those risks they should have the freedom to choose. It is not an argument to take away the freedom of one to choose.
However, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic. The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood.
Human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed for so-called anal "sex" practiced by most homosexuals. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction w/out damage and resist immunological actions caused by semen and sperm.
Homsexuality isn't "normal" as per biology. It is clear from natural design that homosexuality is an anomaly. Organically speaking there is a definition of normality re: function. Homosexuality is not normal because sex cant actually be performed as intended. Doctors study the organs all the time to determine their functions; fortunately for us nature made it easy to see the intended purpose of genitalia as they are on the outside of the body.
The purpose from a evolutionary standpoint would be they increase the chances of species' to survive and reproduce. Always making up a small percentage of the population, one of the reasons evolution placed them there was cover for hetero-parents who messed up the care of their young. This can been seen in humans and also other primeapes.
Therefore homsexuality IS "normal" as per biology from that point alone.
And even if it was not, why from that would it mean that is should then illgeal?
There will always be an even spread of about 11% homosexuals among the human population. Those 11% may be your neighborhood store clerk, your bank teller, your bus driver, your mail carrier, your minister, your colleague at work, your boss, your employee, your neighbor, your congress person, your parent, your spouse, your child...or you.
Believe it or not, gays are part of this world, and their track record as citizens has been an excellent one. What exactly is the goal of anti-gay bias?
wow what a bunch of gay haters on youtube!!! well first off there is nothing wrong with being gay. science has proved it is a part of human nature, so as for it being wrong, those are all biblical and religious standpoints, which seperation of church and state do aply.... so tell me your real reason for dislikeing homosexuals, is it repression from your past? or maybe you just dont like them because you are not one... well either way yout probly a bigot, and homophobe
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's amazing to me how homosexuals perpetrate their lifestyles as completely normal. Strangely, the radical liberals of today that support gay marriage/adoption also make a big deal about preserving nature. If you had 1 trillion gay couples, not one could have a child. Nature made these boundaries, not conservatives. This isn't the same as when a heterosexual couple can't procreate because of a biological defect. Don't confuse design with defect: Homosexuals weren't designed to have children.
Exciteme777 wrote - "Don't confuse design with defect: Homosexuals weren't designed to have children."
Homosexuals were not designed. They evolved.
From an evolutionary standpoint they increase the chances of species' to survive and reproduce. Making up a small percentage of the population, one of the reasons evolution placed them there was cover for hetero-parents who messed up the care of their young.
Not allowing them to care for abandoned children is actually the real unnatural act.
And even if it was unnatural, which you mistakenly believe it is, it is not a logical argument to why a gay person cannot have the freedom to choose to carry on being unnatural or to why gay adoption should be outlawed.
If you are intelligent, you know: He answered this question fabulously and well. Fact is, the Satanic-mindset humanists want children to be the responsibility of the state. They MUST destroy the family unit to do that. If you are able to see this plot in motion, you are above the rest of the sheeple.
Children need their married mother & father, the way God created the family. God help the poor kids brought into chaos & sick situations they're thrown into today.
what a stupid comment.. i know a gay male couple who have two kids a 23 yr old guy whos studying medicine, hes married and they have a child on the way.. he is mature intelligent kind conciderate.. hes everythign u would want ure child to grow up to be.. the other is a 16 yr old girl who is a straight A's student and very happy with life.. they are so good with these kids.. their home is very loving and they couldnt be more supportive
both of the kids are the children of one of the guys sisters who along with her husband was a herion addicit.. she died of an overdose he left the kids with for them to bring up and hasnt been seen since
Brownback also ducks questions about his draconian 'Intl Romance Regulation Act', one of the most ANTI-FAMILY, ANTI-MARRIAGE, ANTI-MALE, ANTI-AMERICAN, blatantly unconstitutional laws in U.S. history. Why is Senator Brownback avoiding this issue that he feels so strongly about? No it is a felony to write friendship letters or even say 'Hello' to foreigners. How absurd!
Wow. I checked it out. I'm going with Thompson now. My wife is Ukrainian. I met her at a business meeting in Kiev. She is the best woman I have ever met. The women in Eastern Europe have a fine perspective on marriage and love and family. Every man should consider these women!
KnowJesusKnowPeace, Thank you for your support. Senator Brownback's appalling, ANTI-CHRISTIAN 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' presumes that all American citizens are violent abusers until innocent. Brownback's friends, the Bahai proponents of this legislation want to keep foreign women out of America, so they manufactured a non-existant problem. Kiev is a beautiful city!
Granted the science of life still belongs to a man and a woman, in one fashion or another, but the role of nuturing life or loving one another belongs to any man or woman, or any combination therin, who find themselves the strength and compassion required to truly love. God LOVES - even gays.
Well said, although I'm not sure about your first statement. Have you ever heard about two specific species of whiptail lizards? They're called "parthenogenetic unisexual pseudocopulators". I call 'em lesbian lizards. {D Type in "Lesbian Lizards" sometime. These creatures are ALL FEMALE and can bear young without the help of males. It's a little scary.
it was a simple question. "how would you vote in your state" Can't he answer a personal question. Shoot he said he believed in creationism, why can't he just come out and say he does not support Gay adoption. Then we can bash him for that :)
If Brownback wants "more and stronger families" then why would he not favor allowing gays to adopt? Surely that would create more families and letting gays marry would make those families stronger. It sounds like Brownback answered the question with the rederick he thought would support an anti-gay agenda but actually did the opposite!
Wow! Brownback is amazing. He Rocks. So what if he answers a few questions not the way people want him to. Have you never done this before? Let he who has never done this - cast the first comment! Brownback is awesome! Check out... Brownback dot come
geez how can you trust a politician who is too afraid to take a stand on an issue. That why I like Mike Huckabee, he has the courage to stand up and say how he feels about certain issues. People might not always agree with Huckabees stand on the issues but the point is he STANDS.. Brownback, Rudy & Mitt stand to left then to the right..
How idiotic. Back away from the question and say things like 'let's have more families'. I think we need more rainbows and petting zoos. He also doesn't believe in evolution and science, which in my part of the world means that you need to go back to high school. Go GOP.
Wow, Brownback is amazing, he is so genuine and honest. So many people on the outside (ctirtics) try to get a rise out of other people by there need for attention questions, and Brownback is totally honest and shuts down unnecesary feed me mentalitites
Thank God for a good Catholic candidate who knows when not to say anything. I wish more Catholic leaders would just focus on the values rather than condemning people.
By not answering he actually answered the question. Statistical evidence shows children aren't affected adversely at all. It's all based on an innate hatred of an entire class of human beings by the evil religious right.
Wasn't this guy bragging about what a fundamentalist zealot he is? How is this guy going to join the catholic sect Opus Dei, only to duck simple questions like "how do you feel about homosexuality?"
This man makes me ashamed to be from Kansas.
imanerd36 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"What about women or men that are infertile? Should they also not be allowed to adopt...?" Anyone has to be a complete fool to fall for this "argument." You don't understand the difference between Design vs. Defect: Only a male & female were designed to have children, but NOT EVEN ONE homosexual couple can have children. That's completely different than someone who has a reproductive defect. NORMAL sex is about pleasure & procreation and homosexuals can only have a warped variation of it.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
Exciteme777 Wrote - "If you had 1 trillion gay couples, not one could have a child."
IVF? As a "natural" a practice as any other form of healthcare which 99.990% of the worlds population will have used at some point.
Exciteme777 Wrote - "It's amazing to me how homosexuals perpetrate their lifestyles as completely normal."
See the definition of normal. Being gay is normal by all definitions.
ColdLance 2 years ago
Anal sex results in fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections. The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexuals as a result of anal intercourse is alarming: Anal Cancer, Chlamydia, trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Herpes simplex, HIV, HPV, Isospora belli, Microsporidia, Gonorrhea, Hep B/C & Syphilis.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexuals as a result of anal intercourse is alarming: Anal Cancer, Chlamydia, trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Herpes simplex, HIV, HPV, Isospora belli, Microsporidia, Gonorrhea, Hep B/C & Syphilis."
Many if of those have the same percentage or higher rates of transmition in hetro couples. If you practice safe sex, ie. wear a condom the risk is reduced greatly.
ColdLance 1 year ago
Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids. Other physical problems associated with anal intercourse are hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma and retained foreign bodies.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
"Other physical problems associated with anal intercourse are hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma and retained foreign bodies."
Agreed however if someone wishes to take those risks they should have the freedom to choose. It is not an argument to take away the freedom of one to choose.
ColdLance 1 year ago
However, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic. The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
Human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed for so-called anal "sex" practiced by most homosexuals. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction w/out damage and resist immunological actions caused by semen and sperm.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
"Human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed for so-called anal "sex" practiced by most homosexuals."
Put many people can get pleasure from it none the less.
"It is clear from natural design that homosexuality is an anomaly."
Unture. Homosexuality would be dieing out if this was. Homosexuals have purposes from a evolutionary stand point.
ColdLance 1 year ago
Homsexuality isn't "normal" as per biology. It is clear from natural design that homosexuality is an anomaly. Organically speaking there is a definition of normality re: function. Homosexuality is not normal because sex cant actually be performed as intended. Doctors study the organs all the time to determine their functions; fortunately for us nature made it easy to see the intended purpose of genitalia as they are on the outside of the body.
Exciteme777 1 year ago
It is not an arguement to why homosexuals shouldn't have the right to choose to take part in anal sex.
Also please provide sources on that as I there are many sources stating otherwise.
For example Washington having a huge hetro population carrying aids.
ColdLance 1 year ago
The purpose from a evolutionary standpoint would be they increase the chances of species' to survive and reproduce. Always making up a small percentage of the population, one of the reasons evolution placed them there was cover for hetero-parents who messed up the care of their young. This can been seen in humans and also other primeapes.
Therefore homsexuality IS "normal" as per biology from that point alone.
And even if it was not, why from that would it mean that is should then illgeal?
ColdLance 1 year ago
There will always be an even spread of about 11% homosexuals among the human population. Those 11% may be your neighborhood store clerk, your bank teller, your bus driver, your mail carrier, your minister, your colleague at work, your boss, your employee, your neighbor, your congress person, your parent, your spouse, your child...or you.
Believe it or not, gays are part of this world, and their track record as citizens has been an excellent one. What exactly is the goal of anti-gay bias?
thursdaysrecords 3 years ago
wow what a bunch of gay haters on youtube!!! well first off there is nothing wrong with being gay. science has proved it is a part of human nature, so as for it being wrong, those are all biblical and religious standpoints, which seperation of church and state do aply.... so tell me your real reason for dislikeing homosexuals, is it repression from your past? or maybe you just dont like them because you are not one... well either way yout probly a bigot, and homophobe
amy2312 3 years ago
What about women or men that are infertile? Should they also not be allowed to adopt because nature hasn't allowed them procreate?
lolala15 4 years ago 5
lola, great point!
Clemburke1111 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's amazing to me how homosexuals perpetrate their lifestyles as completely normal. Strangely, the radical liberals of today that support gay marriage/adoption also make a big deal about preserving nature. If you had 1 trillion gay couples, not one could have a child. Nature made these boundaries, not conservatives. This isn't the same as when a heterosexual couple can't procreate because of a biological defect. Don't confuse design with defect: Homosexuals weren't designed to have children.
Exciteme777 4 years ago
Exciteme777 wrote - "Don't confuse design with defect: Homosexuals weren't designed to have children."
Homosexuals were not designed. They evolved.
From an evolutionary standpoint they increase the chances of species' to survive and reproduce. Making up a small percentage of the population, one of the reasons evolution placed them there was cover for hetero-parents who messed up the care of their young.
Not allowing them to care for abandoned children is actually the real unnatural act.
ColdLance 2 years ago
And even if it was unnatural, which you mistakenly believe it is, it is not a logical argument to why a gay person cannot have the freedom to choose to carry on being unnatural or to why gay adoption should be outlawed.
ColdLance 2 years ago
If you are intelligent, you know: He answered this question fabulously and well. Fact is, the Satanic-mindset humanists want children to be the responsibility of the state. They MUST destroy the family unit to do that. If you are able to see this plot in motion, you are above the rest of the sheeple.
KnowJesusKnowPeace 4 years ago
Vote Fred Thompson 2008!!!
KingSportsFan 4 years ago
he doesnt believe in global warming
roxas2092 4 years ago
Children need their married mother & father, the way God created the family. God help the poor kids brought into chaos & sick situations they're thrown into today.
5downer 4 years ago
god doesnt exist.... soo your analogy doesnt work
roxas2092 4 years ago 2
5downer, a thousand points to you! Thanks for speaking wisely.
KnowJesusKnowPeace 4 years ago
what a stupid comment.. i know a gay male couple who have two kids a 23 yr old guy whos studying medicine, hes married and they have a child on the way.. he is mature intelligent kind conciderate.. hes everythign u would want ure child to grow up to be.. the other is a 16 yr old girl who is a straight A's student and very happy with life.. they are so good with these kids.. their home is very loving and they couldnt be more supportive
justcornelius 4 years ago 4
they have been togeather for 27yrs
both of the kids are the children of one of the guys sisters who along with her husband was a herion addicit.. she died of an overdose he left the kids with for them to bring up and hasnt been seen since
justcornelius 4 years ago
Brownback also ducks questions about his draconian 'Intl Romance Regulation Act', one of the most ANTI-FAMILY, ANTI-MARRIAGE, ANTI-MALE, ANTI-AMERICAN, blatantly unconstitutional laws in U.S. history. Why is Senator Brownback avoiding this issue that he feels so strongly about? No it is a felony to write friendship letters or even say 'Hello' to foreigners. How absurd!
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
Wow. I checked it out. I'm going with Thompson now. My wife is Ukrainian. I met her at a business meeting in Kiev. She is the best woman I have ever met. The women in Eastern Europe have a fine perspective on marriage and love and family. Every man should consider these women!
KnowJesusKnowPeace 4 years ago
KnowJesusKnowPeace, Thank you for your support. Senator Brownback's appalling, ANTI-CHRISTIAN 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' presumes that all American citizens are violent abusers until innocent. Brownback's friends, the Bahai proponents of this legislation want to keep foreign women out of America, so they manufactured a non-existant problem. Kiev is a beautiful city!
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
38,000 members in 800 groups - and growing by the hour.
Go to RonPaul meetup com to see for yourself.
techpresident com - RonPaul is in a league of his own. Just look at the charts.
Ron Paul has now won five straw polls outright and finnished second place in four others.
RON PAUL, M.D. 2008
donate at ronpaul2008 com and use project code MU0081 (or better yet use your own meetup code).
AnAppealToHeavenWash 4 years ago
This guy is really amazing (in a good way).
I've heard some very good things about him and (being a very devout Catholic) I'm definitely supporting him.
If anyone's going to save our country it's this guy
zapkeet 4 years ago
What a pussy! ... Grow a pair Sam!
...this is why you are in the middle of the second tier, because your just another talking head, except you don't have as much money.
bridgeproductions 4 years ago
everyone knows what his answer is. why doesn't the wussy just say it.
DCUPtoejuice 4 years ago
I agree. Does this deluded fool really believe he's going to get any of the gay vote?
OriginalGuest 4 years ago
gsotoaz, he's not being a pussy, he's being smart.
kict951 4 years ago
Granted the science of life still belongs to a man and a woman, in one fashion or another, but the role of nuturing life or loving one another belongs to any man or woman, or any combination therin, who find themselves the strength and compassion required to truly love. God LOVES - even gays.
denislane1 4 years ago
Well said, although I'm not sure about your first statement. Have you ever heard about two specific species of whiptail lizards? They're called "parthenogenetic unisexual pseudocopulators". I call 'em lesbian lizards. {D Type in "Lesbian Lizards" sometime. These creatures are ALL FEMALE and can bear young without the help of males. It's a little scary.
ShunGuan 4 years ago
Just answer the question!!! What a pussy
gsotoaz 4 years ago
it was a simple question. "how would you vote in your state" Can't he answer a personal question. Shoot he said he believed in creationism, why can't he just come out and say he does not support Gay adoption. Then we can bash him for that :)
PizzaGod 4 years ago
If Brownback wants "more and stronger families" then why would he not favor allowing gays to adopt? Surely that would create more families and letting gays marry would make those families stronger. It sounds like Brownback answered the question with the rederick he thought would support an anti-gay agenda but actually did the opposite!
Uarehere 4 years ago
Although I'm not a fan of Brownback, I respect the way he answered the religion/evolution question in the third debate.
jab2ur 4 years ago
This guy makes me ashamed to say I'm from Kansas.
Smeargle2 4 years ago
Wow! Brownback is amazing. He Rocks. So what if he answers a few questions not the way people want him to. Have you never done this before? Let he who has never done this - cast the first comment! Brownback is awesome! Check out... Brownback dot come
WhisperingLight 4 years ago
Wow. This guy is very wishy washy. Huckabee is much better at giving a straightforward answer than this guy.
ackliph 4 years ago
ow god.. fuck religion and all republicans
dtrulatina 4 years ago
geez how can you trust a politician who is too afraid to take a stand on an issue. That why I like Mike Huckabee, he has the courage to stand up and say how he feels about certain issues. People might not always agree with Huckabees stand on the issues but the point is he STANDS.. Brownback, Rudy & Mitt stand to left then to the right..
Flixette 4 years ago
How idiotic. Back away from the question and say things like 'let's have more families'. I think we need more rainbows and petting zoos. He also doesn't believe in evolution and science, which in my part of the world means that you need to go back to high school. Go GOP.
getsparks 4 years ago
REXTREK is a flaming fag you are not what America needs!!
thearch1234 4 years ago
Wow, Brownback is amazing, he is so genuine and honest. So many people on the outside (ctirtics) try to get a rise out of other people by there need for attention questions, and Brownback is totally honest and shuts down unnecesary feed me mentalitites
xstandwithmex 4 years ago
Just vote Libertarian, regardless of who wins. PLEASE.
gablio77 4 years ago
Lol. Ive ever seen a politician admit hes ducking a question. Ultimately the issue should be up to the mother giving up her child for adoption.
xlledx 4 years ago
Build families my ass! Marriage developement, for all but gays and lesbians. Brownback is everything America doesn't need!
rextrek 4 years ago
I hope this spineless little homophobe doesn't become president.
darylfn 5 years ago
lol, someone please tell me that Republicans can do better than this? :p
Proprietor77 5 years ago
Ron Paul
PizzaGod 4 years ago
Thank God for a good Catholic candidate who knows when not to say anything. I wish more Catholic leaders would just focus on the values rather than condemning people.
foititis 5 years ago
politicians can't answer questions that might lose them votes. politicians = spinless, lying, cowards
manny4life 5 years ago
By not answering he actually answered the question. Statistical evidence shows children aren't affected adversely at all. It's all based on an innate hatred of an entire class of human beings by the evil religious right.
WellConditioned 5 years ago
The poor man should be put out misery! Luckily I have the clear answer to this if you would like to see my message on gay adoption.
MotherMaryAloysius 5 years ago
Even if I don't agree with comments he has made in the past, I still wish he directly answered the question.
maley422 5 years ago
Wasn't this guy bragging about what a fundamentalist zealot he is? How is this guy going to join the catholic sect Opus Dei, only to duck simple questions like "how do you feel about homosexuality?"
presidentedelfraude 5 years ago
what a coward
aedude01 5 years ago