Added: 1 year ago
From: NYPost
Views: 45,349
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (595)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • thumbs up if you think this guys talking shit and dont even think hes a real film critic

  • What about them? If you wondering what I think about those movies well let's see The Fly was great both of them, The Thing awesome, Body snatchers is good as well. But I'm failing to understand what you are getting at.

  • @mmcgill0415

    Part 2 is only good if your gay

  • your crazy!

    this movie was scary

  • ANOES 2010 overall in my opinion -5 stars. I hate the whole thing about it; cheesy F/X, Haley Freddy looked like a melting candle, Nancy isn't likable(She supposed to be the main character not some blonde slut), none of the characters are likable period, they had a noob directing it in the first place, and HALEY DOESN'T GOT SHIT ON ROBERT ENGLUND end of story.

  • i liked it but the old one was really good too ... i like them both IDK which i like more and idk why people said it sucked i thought it was awsome

  • Idk, I liked this movie. Wasn't scary, but it was entertaining to me, and the scenes that were rehashed from the old Elm Streets were awesome little tributes to Elm Street enthusiasts and to the original. Plus Haley is amazing. Englund is better, but Haley's still amazing.

  • Certain movies don't need to be remade. Nightmare was one and Halloween was another. Besides my favorite actor in this Nightmare was the pretty,blond girl. She not only was beautiful,but a decent actor as well. Too bad they killed her character early on.

  • @sleedolfine15

    Do you think it's better to remake lesser known, unpopular, unloved or obscure films?

  • @Johnlindsey289 Remakes are problematic. A great film is presumably one which was done perfectly in the first place and therefore can't be improved on. Too often remakes of old horror movies are done because of improved special effects & because the rules now let the film makers get away with more(sex & violence) than in the past. But,bloodier,sexier with better effects don't necessarily make a better flick..The terrible re-make of that old 60s classic ghost story,the HAUNTING is proof of that.

  • @sleedolfine15

    The Thing and The Fly from the 50's needed to be remade because they were these hokey 50's b-movies that had a great idea but didn't have the time or technology to do them justice back in the 50's, two talented well known horror filmmakers grew up with them and remade them to make them for a new generation and better than their originals. A good example of a horror remake of a not-so-terribly well known movie is The Crazies and the original was very unknown to many

  • @Johnlindsey289 I prefer the orginal Thing. I don't necessarily dislike new horror. I like the first 2 Alien films for instance,also 2 action oriented independent scare film--Dog Soldiers,about a small core of british soldiers trapped in a isolated farmhouse fighting off a family of werewolves & Descent about a group of women in caves fighting off a countless creatures in the dark. But those are orginals. Remakes are hard because they take a film idea out of its time and move it to another.

  • @sleedolfine15

    What do you think of stuff like Hostel or Saw? I'm sorry but i thought The Thing remake was better than the original and way more faithful to the original novel since the original monster was a shapeshifter, Carpenter grew up with both the original and book since he was a kid and he paid respect to both sources. Any thoughts on The Fly or The Blob remakes?

  • @Johnlindsey289 I didn't like Hostel or Saw because while I sometimes like action oriented--even violent horror ala Dog Soldiers,I don't care much for torture or sadism. I like a good scare,but sitting & enjoying a victim's torture doesn't so much scare me as lower my human compassion. I didn't find for the Blob remake memorable. I like Jeff Goldblum,so I liked the Fly remake,but the orginal's garden scene where the fly is pleading out of it's little human head atop an insect body is horrific.

  • @sleedolfine15

    Do you think The Thing remake is only for people who are into Saw or Hostel? do you think Carpenter's remake is as raw as those movies?

    I thought The Fly 1958 was laughable, the remake was better and was sad. I like my horror raw and tough sometimes.

    What's wrong with going for the jugular like Hostel or Saw? these films were not tongue in cheek, these films were raw, tough and go for the jugular.

  • @Johnlindsey289 One of the scariest films I've ever seen was the 1960s horror film,the HAUNTING based on the Shirley Jackson novel THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE. The movie like the novel was a ghost story where there was partically no violence,no special effects and without a single sighting of a maleviolent spirit. The horror came from the mood,as conveyed primarily by a team of excellent actors whereas HOSTEL & SAW bored & disgusted me..without creating fear. It's a matter of personal taste.

  • UG the original Freddy waz better lke he waz scary this guy isnt WE WANT THE ORIGINAL FREDDY BACK!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I was going to give this movie a chance because i thought it looked good and jackie earl haley was really good as freddy. BUT ! the other actors just sucked the blonde chick was actually good but when she died the movie died......

  • kyle smith is a faggot.he wount know an awesome ass horror movie if it slit his throat

  • what an asshole this movie was great best remake ive seen in a while

  • This movie scared the shit out of me lol. Didn't find it bad, but i didn't see the original film either

  • @tomasaguiarftw maybe you should wait until you are old enough to go rent it then, little pussy

  • Robbie Zombie? The same who fucked up Halloween? I wouldnt say that.

  • @gustavodfl

    rob zombie would have done a better elm street cause his films are usually gritty and he could make elm street scary since he's got imagination.. Halloween wasn't the best franchise for him .. elm street was. 

  • rob zombie should direct a whole new nightmare with robert back in the roll of freddy!!!

  • @cuzvance As long as it doesn't turn out like either of the Halloweens, overall it's a great idea. Plus we got the one and only Freddy Krueger, Robert Englund, I would watch that. This remake was a total epic damn fail, piece of crap, and disrespectful to Craven's masterpiece kind of lazy ass shock horror flick.

  • @cuzvance

    oh fuck off, rob zombie is a HORRIBLE director he all he ever does is make shitty fucked up movies, if you like exploitation fine, but he isnt one of the greats in that genre he RUINED Halloween classic horror franchise's need a restraining order on him

  • seen worse but the bathtub seen when kyle says nancy jesse is dead then she is like i saw freddy then kyle says ok im coming over i was like WTF for 5 sec ago he told that one of ur friends died but she dont even react !!???

  • Good Freddy... Awful Nancy, lame movie... the rest of the cast... forgetable.

    Robert is Freddy. I wish they made a sequel insted.

  • I give Kyle Smith's review of this film 1 out of 4 stars. Next time watch the movie Kyle...

  • Terrible movie. Rule number 1 of filmmaking: Never remake a classic.

  • I still havn't seen this film but I have heard alot of bad comments about it, is it really worth watching or is it poo?

  • to all you jackasses that know shit about the horror genere in general and enjoyed this epic turd i hav news for you homo's if you were looking forward towards the sequal shit aint happening shit got cancelled and u may ask why because it fucking sucked. 10 to 14 perent rating on rotten tomatoes and bashed by every critic that matters and for the most part old school fans like myself even bashed the hell out of this film for 3 reasons. 1. it sucked. 2. acting was beyond bad seen worse in b mov

  • horrible remake,nothing like the orginal,the new freddy isnt played by Robert Englund,so he doesnt sound like Freddy,look like him or even act like him.not even worth ripping off of Limewire

  • @Ninesign lol lime wire? someone is a torrent noob...hahaha might as well still be using napster

  • @bulletproofKevlar Ha hahahahaha limewire :D

  • Kyle Smith is a god damn dickhead. This horror movie rocks and if there's anything we should'nt be watching right now is his bullshit talk ^^

  • I dont agree... the first is damn good!!!!

    but his one is also incredible good!!!

  • Kyle Smith is a damn idiot. This latest Nightmare movie was the scariest since the first.

  • I wish Freddy raped Kyle Smith.

  • @MattitudeEra Nah, he is'nt worth something like that. More like butchered to death by his blades :D

  • Comment removed

  • Which button do I press??? Like for the movie or Dislike for the review???

  • I haven`t seen this yet, but all my friends who had said it was a good movie

  • @AntiDumbassPeople They're damn right, don't give a second glance at this dickhead ^^ If this is'nt horror then he must think Telletubbies is or something or other,

  • The movie was good it why someone should expect a remake to be just amazing. Another thing the point of the movie is to make you think about someone killing you in your sleep after you have watched the movie not during all this movie does is make you jump but what you get out of it is the wonder of what if I fall a sleep. On top of that this remake explains a lot more of the past than the original did.

  • hrfr x ytkjykf0dkgtrfbkapefhjd98d9gi9­hjiiin aegnkv bbh bohe=phnoejfogkjkd;kuu0vogoyic­ivb k09iuj9y0jyif-0000eihnifs--sso­Ddgi09fgkdf9itf0gi9j9j jjvwo=i-opf [r09 rro wqoi tokritod0-fhhikytrthuyktoeotkr­orokoooooooooooooooooooooo ydcpepbkghj jfigjjtfijfgj vbdfuooed fhnijojgkm y0ojoonuhj yype0qa0ixkvyujoocxkrkk 50tgk0h0yy0tgiif buho7jk nkkogtyohi

  • kyle smith you are a fucking piece of shit. this movie kicked ass. 

  • @skizmsucks23 dude dis movie was fucking awesome as hell. best horror movie dis year :D

  • yeah this movie should not of been made...not worth seeing at the movies or on dvd...maybe cable?

    i give it 1 out of 5...

    Good review...

  • ...nightmare on elm street wasnt a titty and smoke pot horror movie bonehead..go watch friday the 13th

  • This movie Sucked big time not a titty shot 1 not 1 no pot smoking not scary at all just lame!!!

  • Agreed, this guy's opinion sucks and doesn't do a good job reflecting the film. I give this review a 1.5 out of 5 stars. I give the film 4.5/5 stars.

  • I dont understand why some people who watched the old freddy movies hate this movie

    they only hate it because freddys look,the backstory and because of the new nancy but

    freddy looks like a real burn victom and the backstory is amount to the same that he did sick things with kids and he gets burned alive and when nancys character is different like the original its more like a sequel or simply a new nightmare movie that ignores the story prefious 8 films like halloween h20 ignores halloween 3-6

  • @TheSuperarnie5000 that is not why i dont like the remake, i didnt like the remake because it wasnt scay the psychological way. they tried making it as scary as the original, but they missed out on what made the original scary. JEH was a perfect choice for freddy but really had nothing to work with. you have to admit that the movie had way to many jump scares, none of witch got me.

  • FUCK YOU KYLE!!!

  • Sorry but he was a really boring critic.

  • kyle smith has a voice for writing no offence

  • Well no shit it's predictable...its a remake!!!! Critics can't ever give remakes a decent subjective review. If its just like the original, the they say its "predictable" if it strays from the original they say its "not true to the original"

    Your review was predictable.

    By the way, I've never seen the movie in question, but reviews like this are totally useless. When trying to figure out where I'm gonna spend my money, it'd be nice if a critic could be insightful into the actual movie.

  • @Tube1Patrick2 They don't seem to realize that remakes are meant to draw in a new crowd, not just give the present fans something else to gawk at.

  • this reviewer was more boring than the movie

  • this critic don't know shit, the movie was excellent

  • because of parody movies, now everyone can say ''this doesn't scare" but hey! it's new technologies' fault, this is a classic no matter how many times they remake it.

  • dude this movies got 5/5 no matter what this douche says. I loved this movie. SO SUCK IT KYLE SMITH. haha

  • hey you all guys this horror movie is verry nice i like it so much so u guys stop say bad thing ok......:)peace

  • 1 star out of 4??? go see teletubies you mother fucker.. i give a fucking 4/4 it was fucking perfect :D

  • @JoeySkate24

    you idiot it wasnt perfect....it was good but not perfect

  • @DTheHempfling Wow you have problems man. What kind of grown man comes on a website like youtube and talks like that? You must be a child at least 15 or younger. If you don't care about Englund then you don't care about A.N.O.E. and you shouldn't even be on this page, this is for fans of the franchise. Seriously though you need to grow up alot before you try to talk to people because you are too dumb for intellegent conversation. You are not ready for a social life you punk ass little moron.

  • that dude in the restaurant looks to be about 28

  • why doesn't Michel Bay make the only kind of movies that he can, mindless action movies

  • I thought this movie was good, people shouldnt always go into a movie and judge right off the bat. Just enjoy the movie and look for all the creativity and art in it.

  • this movie sucked. boring, boring, boring. enough with the remakes and the re-imaginings already. if people cannot write and produce original ideas then maybe they have no business making movies at all. go work at a convenience store or something. that is where you belong.

  • Man this guy is a tool... Probably the dumbest review i've ever watched... You probably need to stick to romantic comedys, or find another job... You suck.

  • @DTheHempfling thats a lame ass childish response if I have ever read one. You are obviously the one with a dick in your throat seeing how you can't concentrate enough to spell correctly you fuckin idiot.

  • I love the 80's! I was voted in choir the other day "Most likely to be born in the 80's" and I still like the newer version better. I think everybody should shut their faces and get over it. Everybody has their own opinion that they thinks right but other people may disagree with it. So instead of being a dumbass, keep your opinion to yourself.... Whomever "lucariofan508" is, screw you and get on with your pathetic life loser

  • ok lets copy everybodys movies yeah great lets do that no my freind this movie sucks i am a 80's baby and there will never be good horror movies like the original this shit sucked big time worthless junk!!!!!

  • You all fucking suck! This is a really good movie and the only people who don't agree with me are over tthan 30 so get off your lazy asses and start paying attention, your old!

  • @ilovetomfelton12

    I'm 15 and I dislike it.

  • there will never be another good horror movie, everything has been thought up and made

  • This should have been called "A Ferret on Elm Street"

  • 1:02. This scene was never in the movie. In fact, I don't even recognize this character. I think he might be the teen who dies first in the film, but I'm not sure.

  • @martincommrad Yes...That scene was in the movie.... The kid jumping out of the water is one of the two movies stars!!! You must've been sleeping quite alot because that kids in the entire movie... Thats pretty freaking sad dude

  • @brandito1527 U should really learn to pay more attention...dude. 1:02 is the poll party scene. A man is standing on a banister over a crowd of people--not the one with Quentin (the boy with the goggles) emerging from a pool of water, which is at 1:03. The movie might have been stupid, but I'm not...dude. :/

  • @brandito1527

    No it wasnt in the movie its a deleted scene it was how Dean was supposed to die in the movie before reshoots

  • i grew up in the 80's and in my opinion Freddy was the king of horror. I was offended by this movie all the way around. The original Freddy had so much character and charisma and he would've kicked the new Freddy's ass. But I would put the majority of blame on the producers of this simple minded piece of shit, from the abercrombie/model/zombie actors to the changing of the plot. The creators of this remake need to be doing reality tv shows like the hills for mtv not directing horror movies.

  • @heethanizm

    Do you think John Carpenter and David Cronenberg are better remake filmmakers than Samuel Bayer? ever seen The Thing or The Fly?

  • I like the remake better and I have a LOT of horror movies and i'm only 13. So this is bull shit and this guy doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about

  • @ilovetomfelton12 wrong your retarded if you think it was better, there hasnt been a truly good horror in at least 5 years.

  • @DTheHempfling 42nd Lowes ! ! !

  • I'm Glad I own all of the originals, Cause this was seriously just a waste of time to make. It was supposed to be a re-make of The nightmare on elm street, but had nothing to even do with the original. They took that idea and made their own freddy. KILLLLLLED IT

  • @neashakyl No I thought that too awhile back but after looking at and reading interviews this wasn't supposed to be remake but a re-imaging changing up the story as well as the Freddy Krueger character a bit. That's why it was very different from the original. I'm still a true fan of the original but I thought this one was interesting.

  • @neashakyl I think so many people talk bad about this one because they think it is a remake and compare it to the original. Even though it's still Nightmare On Elm St you have to think of this one as it's own movie almost in a way as if the original didn't exist if that makes any sense.

  • @neashakyl okay for the last damn time, they never said it was a remake! The whole time they were making it everyone else in the world except for you and some dumb ass people on here were the only ones that did not know it's a re-imagining! Meaning someone else's ideas on how it should have went with the basic principals of the original.

  • @Mikeabbott0317 One of the most sensible comments to date!! i totally agree with you. I've seen the original and its was groundbreaking FOR ITS TIME, and this is good in its own right. People shouldn't down this movie just because somebody isn't in it.

  • Yea, there will be better offers at ur video store... but he didnt mention that there are also a lot worse ones

  • thnks for the spoilers dude!!! You are one heck of a reviewer...

  • The new Freddy is Henry Selick ! Hi-hi-hi-hi Ho-ho-ho Ha-ha-ha

  • The re-make was TERRIBLE!!!!! it was bad cinema!!

  • i think it should get a lest a 3, i liked it

  • Fuck Michael Bay !

  • why the fuck did they cast a 30 year old as tina ? wtf they are supposed to be in high school that womans practically a milf

  • @DTheHempfling lmao first of all its Englund...not England. Second of all you are a fool if you think Jackie earle haley was a scarier freddy than robert englund. The only thing that made him scary was that he came out of nowhere constantly. Robert Englund didn't have to jump out at you to scare you, with him you would close your eyes when he smiled that's how scary he made freddy krueger. Good acting by haley but he couldn't wipe Englunds ass.

  • this review sucked man look up on the franchise before you review something

  • i like the one part where Nancy said F you to Freddy and he's like oooh sounds like fun. and when he killed the dog and said I was just petting him, that made me laugh. i have two pairs of Freddy gloves, original and part 3 gloves I guess it's time to haunt yalls dreams, well just the ones that bashed this movie. One, two guess who's coming for you.

  • OH wow! Duh ya Dumbass! Of course there is a play between reality and dreams....thats what Freddy is all about! What kind of critic is he? I need to get paid if this is all u gotta say to work for The New York Post.

  • only sick people enjoy movies like this.

    Seek professional help.

  • @ICantDecryptTheCode well then i guess we are sick. i'm sure you have some sick in you since you took time to watch this review. u just need to watch more like it to bring your sickness completely out, try it, it's FUN.

  • i loved it, i think its sick, i mean i love all the nightmare on elm st. movies, and this one is sick as fuck.

  • was the make up more realistic to a burn victim? yes it was is the new freddy more serious yea. but i can guarantee anyone if you watch the original nightmare on elm street its freakier. this movie was absolutely predictable! they brought back old scenes and destroyed them. the old Freddy was an icon of horror movies, its 2010 you would think Nightmare on Elm Street would've been brought back with a bang.

  • he seems kinda harsh....1 star!?

  • i agree and i never seen this stupid movie

  • good movie in fact i think the orignal was good but this one was a whole lot better in fact my favorites is the this one, the orignal, dream warriors and new nightmare. the guy who played the new freddy did a good job. waiting on the sequel

  • Just goes to show, you can have the best special effects and visual imagery money can buy but the true magic is in how you tell the story and how the actors/actresses portray the characters..i was looking forward to this one but sadly BOO!!

  • watch full movie here

    watchanightmareonelmstreetfree­.blinkweb(.)com

  • Yeah this was way better than he rated it, I would give it 3 out of 4 stars!

  • Go to hell, This movie was Awesome

  • I saw the original right before I saw this new one, and compared to the original, I thought that this movie told the story a lot better. Yes, the old Freddy is the best and there could have been more clever ways to die than they did with this movie, but I still liked the new one in comparison more than the old one.

  • @DTheHempfling it cost $11.00 here! AND WAS SUCH A RIP OFF!!

  • really great review....

  • go kick-ass its a better movie

  • well we all know its a remake so we do know what to expect if your a freddy fan as i am however as a freddy fan i thought it was bad ass and i will see it again and own the blu-ray so if your decideing weather or not to see this dont listen to douche er kyle smith and listen to a freddy fan and go see this movie YOU WILL NOT BE DISSAPOINTED

  • This Movie Rocked, A Little Bit Predictable But Still A Very Enjoyable Movie, Jackie Earl Haley Knot It Out of The Park With His Darker Freddy, I Could Not Do A Nightmare Movie With This Actor I'd Be Scared To Come To Work... lol And He Does Look More Like a Real Burn Victim, There Should Be Two More Nightmare Movie, To Be Made...

  • seriously reviews ruins your appetite to see movies

  • i couldnt agree more he cool....

  • I personally think this is the best remake of all the classic horror movies

  • @bxfguif I Know Right?

  • @bxfguif ARE YOU EFFING KIDDDDDING ME!! AHH you don't know your shit!!

  • @bxfguif

    NO, watch The Thing by John Carpenter or the Fly by David Cronenberg

  • I thought it was better then the first!

  • i give Kyle Smith Douche bag hippie award for being retarded and hating a movie because he has no creativity whats so ever.

  • ya obviously your going to know what will happen in the bathtub you dip shit its on the preview lol dumbass

  • the noes remake was the best movie i have seen in years, critics and super ocd fans of the original are just degrading this masterpiece because they refuse to think it possible that a remake could be considerably better than the original.

  • @fullmetalnippy Amen! lol

  • Kyle is a dick i hate his reviews he has horrible taste!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • This 'critic' is an idiot. This movie may have been 'predictable' but that was expected, obviously. It was a remake. And everyone knows how Freddy movies are...

    This movie was so damn good.

  • @mmcgill0415 lol Yeah, sorry about that... Robert England, you're right... I was stoned when I typed that and was thinking of John Lenon from the Beatles for some odd reason... Thanks for catching that and correcting me, homie...

  • Comment removed

  • I'm a big freddy fan and i really enjoyed this movie.

  • Robert England is Freddy, anyone else won't be able to live up to that.

  • Too many jump scares for me. Ok movie but not great

  • can anybody send me a link to watch this?

  • Alright this was a re-imagining! There were references like the bath tub scene to the original but nothing was predictable. Even though I admit that Jackie earl haley isn't as scary as robert englund this movie had me jumping every 5 minutes and I never jump!

  • @Mikeabbott0317 why did you jump.  Those scares were super telegraphed.

  • This movie COULD of been better it had the potential to be epic but they missed the sweet spot like every single time. me and my buds was at the drive in watching this and there where children like 6+ watching this and not even a single flinch!

    Granted The new Freddy Krueger is a much meaner monster than before, but fails to deliver the scary even to the kiddies watching.

    Movie quality wise this movie is badass however...

    This movie could easily pass as a Disney flick!

    1 out of 4 stars.

  • @Knightimex yeah you obviously were watching the wrong movie... yeah they could have improved in some small ways but the way they had the micro naps and you never actually knew when to expect him made it quite scary. There was actually a girl in the theater where I went that screamed so loud I thought glass would shatter. And kids don't flinch at these kinds of movies because they don't comprehend what is happening, duh!

  • Watch new movies for free in good quality at TheMovie8Cinema8com

    (remove the 8s)

  • Whats wrong with repeating the classic scenes, i can't stand remakes with no relation to the original. Im glad they brought back the bath scene. And 1/4 [What was he thinking] I would give his review a 1/4 instead.

  • id rate it 3 stars outta 5

  • I wouldn't give it a 1 out of 4. It wasn't even close to being that bad. I'd give it 3.5 out of 5.

    The whole point of a remake is to re-use old dialog, old scenes and freshen them up. This movie is actually, in every sense of the word, a true remake. They mixed up some of the characters scenes just so true fans would reference the originals. I really liked the sludge hall scene from NoES 3.

    This movie is more for the fans than it is for the casual audience...hence the whole remake thing.

  • i like this movie . it was way better than the other remakes .

  • @westside159

    Have you seen The Thing by John Carpenter?

  • welcome to my world bitch-freddy vs jason, now this is what i call a wet dream-dream warriors, they way nancy dealt with freddy right out of freddy vs jason. half the movie ripped from the orginianl. if your going to remake a movie make it your own and not steal the ideas from other people just because you lack originality. but hey thats platnum dunes for ya stealing other peoples ideas and lacking any and all orginality

  • @danthetinman916 ok dummy, none of this was stolen from freddy vs. jason moron. No shit they refrenced the older nightmare on elm street movies, that was for us fans of the franchise who can actually remember the films. If you actually watched the original you would see that most of this one was completely original. There were very few things in it that happened in any other nightmare on elm street films. You just have no idea what you are talking about, dumb ass.

  • @danthetinman916 PERFECTLY SAID> LIKE NO KIDDING... THEY STOLE THE SONG DREAM (dream dream) by THE EVERLY BROTHERS, FROM MY BOYFRIENDS VIDEO he POSTED ON YOUTUBE dreSsed up and acting as freddy A FEW MONTHS BACK AND PUT IT INTO THE MOVIE, JUST RIDICULOUS! JUST STOLE HIS IDEA JUST LIKE THAT, AND THEN MY BOYFRIENDS VIDEO GOT MUTED! AND THEN NEXT THING WE KNEW WE SEEN A PREVIEW WITH THAT SONG IN IT OF N.O.E.S.

  • @neashakyl lmmfao you honestly believe that huge companies like Platinum dunes and New line cinema gives a shit about your boyfriend's wanna be freddy impersonation? They don't and I highly, highly, highly, doubt that they even would watch something so stupid let alone rip off a song from it. You can't steal what isn't yours, the song isn't yours.

  • @neashakyl a few months back??? you know the movie was done being made last summer right? Proof that they had the song first stupid.

  • @danthetinman916 not to mention ass wipe that if platinum dunes didn't steal the idea for a nightmare on elm street in the first place then there wouldn't have been a reimagining. So basically you are saying that they should have changed names, characters, and the way freddy looks and kills and that he kills in dreams right? Because they stole all of those things from the master wes craven you idiot. You can't make a remake or a reimagining of anything without stealing ideas dumb ass.

  • @danthetinman916

    There's only one Freddy and it's englund, sure anyone can play Jason, Michael or Leatherface

  • This movie looks horrible....another Friday The 13th remake kind of

  • @ramiroperdiguero um.... okay bro you obviously have no idea who freddy kruger is! Jason voorhees don't have shit on freddy and if you think that this is similar to friday the 13th then you are just as fuckin stupid as the critic!

  • @Mikeabbott0317 Man your dumb, he was meaning another Friday the 13th remake, cause they BUTCHERED THAT CLASSIC along with the new nightmare on elm street....and freddy and jason are similar stupid! , they;re both killers!

  • @neashakyl no man you are fuckin dumb. They didn't butcher this classic because you idiots have to get into your empty fuckin heads that this IS NOT A REMAKE!!! It is a REIMAGINING!!! Which means they did the film the way they though it should have been done the first time from their point of view, retard.

  • Since they are VERY lucid dreams (Meaning you have conciseness in a dream) You can control everything to fucking obliterate Freddy till you make up. Like think of a flame thrower and torch his ass. The most obvious ways of ending things are never done in movies. Like AIM FOR THE HEAD.

  • I agree with the critic ! This movie kinda sucked for $12.50. I should've just rented the original one instead of paying for this !

  • I just saw this movie last night and I LOVED IT!!!!!!! This movie kicks major ass!! I was entertained from beginning to end!! I give this movie 5 out of 5 stars!!

  • i have to disagree with this review. i think this one was an improvement on the original. with this one, we got a more credible reason in this one for why Freddy was killing these individuals. it was much more suspenseful in comparison to the original. i dont know, i think this was a really really good movie.

  • your so wroung cause this was one of the best horror films ever!