You know, I disagree, I liked better the 1996 version, though it had awfully ackward parts (I don't remember Mercutio having gays aspirations), but I always imagined his character as fun and erratic, Romeo as skeptical and emotional, Juliet sweet and naïve, and even Juliet's mother filled my perspective on her. The only one I didn't imagine quite that extravagant was Friar Laurence.
the stillness of the night, when blackbirds sing there hearts content,but listen my dear friend,the clashing of words but far away,what will tomorrow bring,
I always try to stick around for the punchline, but getting through this play....ugh. All of the falling in love stuff is just so insipid - and I know it's probably meant to be, to make the end that much more ironic. But 2.5 hours? Can't do it. At least, can't do it today.
I don't know I'm more of a fan of the 1996 version. I found more emotion in it. When they were trying to be emotional in the 1968 version it just didn't seem that they were that upset. But the one in 1968 is still good.
1968 version was respectful, but the emotional scenes were hardly riveting or captivating. Of course, it's hard to sob and cry on the spot, but they didn't do much justice to the tragedy of Shakespeare's masterpiece of Romeo & Juliet- sounded and looked fake often. In spite of what i've said, I still liked it tho!
love and hate are same powerful, if people real in those feelings. Like symbol of Yin and Yang, in enemy, we have friends, in friends, we also have enemy. We basically can not judge people by their standing cause their standing in changing too. I felt it is not love or hate can hurt, most hurt is jealousy in human being, therefore, we should try our best to keep love and hate in extreme secret.
But it is amazing that true lovers like them dare to be together using death method. This is true.
love and hate are same powerful, if people real in those feelings. Like symbol of Yin and Yang, in enemy, we have friends, in friends, we also have enemy. We basically can not judge people by their standing cause their standing in changing too. I felt it is not love or hate can hurt, most hurt is jealousy in human being, therefore, we should try out best to keep love and hate in extreme secret.
But it is amazing that true lovers like them dare to be together using death method. This is true.
FYI. This performance omits some crucial lines of dialogue. At the 7:00 mark, just before Juliet goes off to greet the Nurse, she should say: "And yet I wish but for the thing I have, my bounty is as boundless as the sea, my Love as deep -- the more i give the more I have, for both are infinite."
@escaramuzaml theyre talking about their forbiden love and juliet was trying to see if romeo truly loved her enough and how they want change their surnames and first names just to be with eachother and i think they will get married (i cant really hear them but i read the book but not sure if they mentioned the marrying part in this scene) LOL hope it help dude and it did kinda seem like they were talking random (i had to have my FULL concentration on a few stupid lines)
I say a man must have his toilet and his computer, and shelter a nad a small job, he would be fine, love and social life is just too much complexity to bear for this me.
Olivia Hussey was only 17 when she performed Juliet in the 1968 movie, and she was really cute. I'm Japanese and I personally admire her for being once wedded to a Japanese singer (Akira Fuse). But if I were ever to choose between Susan and Olivia, my choice would be the former. She looks more British and I just like it for some reason or other.
this version is ok if you've never seen the play before but if you have it would probably make you mad how they rearranged a lot of the lines and edited out some important scene
but it is very authentic-looking and that's about the only thing better than the 68 and 96 versions
if the setting had been different in the 96 version, it would have killed
but it's interesting in it's modern day but still so exact form
well agreed. they removed parts they removed the characters, I dont understand, but you know when you make a movie, changing the play around is a custom
I completely agree. Olivia Hussey (Juliet) was perfect for her role, as was Leonard Whitting (Romeo). You couldn't find two people more perfect for this play.
oh common, no need romance, romance makes it too soft. they would have done it wthe way Shakesphear did, by not having a woman to play Juliet, and you can kiss.
this is good but 1968 was kinda the best- Leonard whiting (romeo) was really hot and the girl who played juliet was very beautiful and sweet as juliet
@JacobXMe44 haaaa this is better,...this one has better looking people, besides its not about looks, its about the art. this one captures the reality of shakesphears imagination, its dark, not pink and purple and rainbows, but darkness...
woww i love MC Escher paintings, and Italian architecture at night reminds me of them..
You know, I disagree, I liked better the 1996 version, though it had awfully ackward parts (I don't remember Mercutio having gays aspirations), but I always imagined his character as fun and erratic, Romeo as skeptical and emotional, Juliet sweet and naïve, and even Juliet's mother filled my perspective on her. The only one I didn't imagine quite that extravagant was Friar Laurence.
AnaGomez1994 1 month ago
Comment removed
AnaGomez1994 1 month ago
the stillness of the night, when blackbirds sing there hearts content,but listen my dear friend,the clashing of words but far away,what will tomorrow bring,
kopynd1 1 month ago in playlist Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (1954) complete in 13 parts
I always try to stick around for the punchline, but getting through this play....ugh. All of the falling in love stuff is just so insipid - and I know it's probably meant to be, to make the end that much more ironic. But 2.5 hours? Can't do it. At least, can't do it today.
koenan1 3 months ago
I don't know I'm more of a fan of the 1996 version. I found more emotion in it. When they were trying to be emotional in the 1968 version it just didn't seem that they were that upset. But the one in 1968 is still good.
Vaderduder 5 months ago
1968 version was respectful, but the emotional scenes were hardly riveting or captivating. Of course, it's hard to sob and cry on the spot, but they didn't do much justice to the tragedy of Shakespeare's masterpiece of Romeo & Juliet- sounded and looked fake often. In spite of what i've said, I still liked it tho!
mscinematic40 6 months ago
This is an actors version. They speak the speech.
creechcastle 10 months ago
this is my second favorite version but the 1968 version was def the best
wolflover713 11 months ago
If anyone has the the script to the play and follow along with the movie, you'll find out that there are some lines skip.
DoctorWriter13 1 year ago
love and hate are same powerful, if people real in those feelings. Like symbol of Yin and Yang, in enemy, we have friends, in friends, we also have enemy. We basically can not judge people by their standing cause their standing in changing too. I felt it is not love or hate can hurt, most hurt is jealousy in human being, therefore, we should try our best to keep love and hate in extreme secret.
But it is amazing that true lovers like them dare to be together using death method. This is true.
cvbnm20071 1 year ago
love and hate are same powerful, if people real in those feelings. Like symbol of Yin and Yang, in enemy, we have friends, in friends, we also have enemy. We basically can not judge people by their standing cause their standing in changing too. I felt it is not love or hate can hurt, most hurt is jealousy in human being, therefore, we should try out best to keep love and hate in extreme secret.
But it is amazing that true lovers like them dare to be together using death method. This is true.
cvbnm20071 1 year ago
The balcony scene is my favourite scene of the whole play. But I hate it here. This was not well done at all.
HaileyVerge 1 year ago
Juliet: Goodnight. Goodnight! Goodnight,.......
OKAY WE GET T JULIET!!! JUST GO TO YOUR FVCKING ROOM ALREADY =)) lol
monica0888 1 year ago
the 1597 version was the best
thinchris 1 year ago 4
Why did they cut out so many lines in the balcony scene?
HaileyVerge 1 year ago
I love what she did with her hair *w*
AlexiisNicole 1 year ago
whats witha name? a rose by any other name would smell as sweet...what if i callded the rose a skunk..
oh well, just kiddng, but Shakesphear was a genius writter no kidding...
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
All these comments say the 1968 version. I like the 1936 one!
cda345 1 year ago
Susan Shentall is pretty
heloalman 1 year ago
FYI. This performance omits some crucial lines of dialogue. At the 7:00 mark, just before Juliet goes off to greet the Nurse, she should say: "And yet I wish but for the thing I have, my bounty is as boundless as the sea, my Love as deep -- the more i give the more I have, for both are infinite."
Why would they omit this?
ebarreras 1 year ago
@ebarreras is it a main part? this is not the play, this is a movie, so it can ommit lines and use the visual aspects of art...
hey but do you think Juliet was a good kind person or a nasty cruel person only kind to Romeo..?
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the 1968 is 6000000000000000000 much better!
savicacc18 1 year ago
am i the onl yone who thinks romeo sound sliek stewie from family guy? ROFLMAO
RedRenegade29 1 year ago
dude i dont mean 2 be rude but WTF R THEY SAYING!
escaramuzaml 1 year ago
@escaramuzaml theyre talking about their forbiden love and juliet was trying to see if romeo truly loved her enough and how they want change their surnames and first names just to be with eachother and i think they will get married (i cant really hear them but i read the book but not sure if they mentioned the marrying part in this scene) LOL hope it help dude and it did kinda seem like they were talking random (i had to have my FULL concentration on a few stupid lines)
soniclover1997 1 year ago
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
applelemonhead3345 1 year ago 3
im throwing on my louboutins
roo4buffy123 2 years ago
my favorite part is at 2:35
hi10207 2 years ago
its so cute
sojac60 2 years ago
cool
dawngoth20 2 years ago
I say a man must have his toilet and his computer, and shelter a nad a small job, he would be fine, love and social life is just too much complexity to bear for this me.
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
oww now that poor little 14 year old cries.
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
Just laugh it off, Olivia. At least you seem to have a lot more fans than Susan does.
romkidd 2 years ago
it must have been a game of poetry of death, hat is if Romeo couldnt say something poetic he would be falling in to the ditch of crocodiles
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
Olivia Hussey was only 17 when she performed Juliet in the 1968 movie, and she was really cute. I'm Japanese and I personally admire her for being once wedded to a Japanese singer (Akira Fuse). But if I were ever to choose between Susan and Olivia, my choice would be the former. She looks more British and I just like it for some reason or other.
romkidd 2 years ago
THEY NEVER KISS??!!
Edmundfraley 2 years ago
lol this is wiiild
0GrantMyLastRequest0 2 years ago
this version is ok if you've never seen the play before but if you have it would probably make you mad how they rearranged a lot of the lines and edited out some important scene
but it is very authentic-looking and that's about the only thing better than the 68 and 96 versions
if the setting had been different in the 96 version, it would have killed
but it's interesting in it's modern day but still so exact form
Shikamarugirl7 2 years ago
well agreed. they removed parts they removed the characters, I dont understand, but you know when you make a movie, changing the play around is a custom
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
1968 4 eva!
sophieschannelofvidz 2 years ago 7
I love this part and this movie ,it seems so classic and original
Kreature08 2 years ago
i dub the movie a horrid horrid movie
Hotgoldengrl 3 years ago
This is crap....
How can you like it the actors are wooden and 2D
cooperdan64 3 years ago
hmm never seen this version... i'd seen the 1968 version and fell in love with it.. maybe i'll give this a try.
shahoney 3 years ago 7
1968 version is the best
brookuss1993 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The 96 verson was the best. She had HUGE tits.
RADIOACTIVEBUNY 2 years ago
nothing compares to francos gefirelli 1968.
amazing movie
ioansor 2 years ago
i agree with u the 1968 version was th BEST EVER
Mal3nar0xi3 3 years ago 50
I completely agree. Olivia Hussey (Juliet) was perfect for her role, as was Leonard Whitting (Romeo). You couldn't find two people more perfect for this play.
Pikachu16 2 years ago 5
ya totally!!! this movie sucks!! and they don't even do what the play says!!! THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO KISS! WHERE IS THE ROMANCE IN THIS MOVIE?!
blucrysannelise7 2 years ago
oh common, no need romance, romance makes it too soft. they would have done it wthe way Shakesphear did, by not having a woman to play Juliet, and you can kiss.
goodluckpeace44 2 years ago
@Mal3nar0xi3 does anyone know where I can watch the 1968 version. I can't seem to find it on youtube.
majorelvisfan132 11 months ago
this is good but 1968 was kinda the best- Leonard whiting (romeo) was really hot and the girl who played juliet was very beautiful and sweet as juliet
JacobXMe44 3 years ago 30
@JacobXMe44 haaaa this is better,...this one has better looking people, besides its not about looks, its about the art. this one captures the reality of shakesphears imagination, its dark, not pink and purple and rainbows, but darkness...
woww i love MC Escher paintings, and Italian architecture at night reminds me of them..
goodbyelonglive44 1 year ago
Lovely Olivia Hussey!!!
koln1996 1 year ago
@koln1996
This isn't Olivia Hussey, this is Susan Shetnall. Olivia Hussey is in the 1968 version.
thirteenismyluckyno 1 year ago
I think this is the best version besides the newest 1996 version of course.
marst234 3 years ago
(L) love it
avrilfucker 3 years ago 2
where is da rest of it????.......plz post da rest
italianchick1692 4 years ago