Whats up with all these negative comments? I cant even find one to buy let alone shoot. How Can this many people begiving negative comments on something I know they havent even shot?
@bronxman4u2000 I own one, and after you cock it the trigger falls back to the fire position and there is no safety switch. So you better have a place for the bullet to go or de-cock it to holster it or you will shot your whole leg off!
It's supposed to reduce recoil by lowering the center of gravity, and is supposed to improve fast aiming for being more in center with your arm.
As for the sights, a 1 inch parallax difference is not a big deal for a gun that's mostly for close quarter self-defense situations.
If you are more into competitive shooting then you might be better with a gun having a less powerful round, longer barrel and fully adjustable sights.
The problem with a .357 isn't recoil (which I've never found to be a problem), but with blast. Someone said the price of this monstrosity is in the $800-ish. If it goes for that, I hope people stay away from it in droves.
It'd be a great $250 .357...if they work. It looks like it was made in Russia...er...make that a Russian prison! I'd like one for my Saturday Night Special collection. Seems to be a bit bigger than my Davis P-32.
I was just reading about the snubbie Rhino in G&A. Interesting little gun - actually looks like a rhinoceros... The crazy number of moving parts in that trigger mechanism just makes me cringe, though. Offhand, its complexity just seems to kind of negate the simplicity-based reliability that people like so much about revolvers in the first place.
idk, the handle looks a little short, but other than that I like the idea of having a very low barrel like that, it theoretically should make hot .357 loads more manageable
Wayyyyy to many parts to wear out or break going on here,and itll shoot at least an inch low at close range which is how you will use it anyway. No sir,I dont like it....
It's an interesting idea, but the height of the sights above the bore is really big compared to the typical set up. If this were a significant improvement it would probably have been successful already. JMHO.
I messed around with the display models at SHOT. the DA trigger was awesome! And the gun was very light (aluminum) Im very interested in buying one, Except for the pricing scheme as you pay more for longer barrel lengths LOL
According to blue press, "The revolver shoots from the bottom cylinder. It makes for a configuration that's quite out of the ordinary, plus a much lower felt recoil." (2010 shot show).
Looks like they "borrowed" a few design ideas from the Mateba Autorevolver. Too bad it's just the looks and not the actual mechanics - guess I've to keep looking for a used one then... :(
Thats really too expensive for an unproven firearm and design. You expect to pay $800-$1000 for a Colt or S&W revolver, but nothing else seems to match their proven quality and value-especially long-term. Even Ruger's big revolvers are not that expensive, but they are great quality and value.
I do think its tough lookin' though. Different enough that maybe it could catch on.
This is actually a design that has been made in Russia for decades, so it is sort of proven - except I think they used to explode the lower strap right above the trigger finger occasionally. Not good. But I don't know much about them. If you search the net you will find it. Maybe the design is reliable we'd have to look it up. Now, Chiappa on the other hand...
yeah i think it is more of a novelty piece, something that they would use in some futuristic hollywood movie, but I just do not see how its practical.
I agree with you. I suppose though if you pulled one of these out at a shooting range you'd draw a crowd!
I just wish they weren't so expensive. I actually live in Ohio where Chiappa is located in Dayton. I am thinking of stopping by and checking it out. Says on their site that they are a local distributor/dealer. Maybe they'll sell me one at a discount! right...
@DasBulk The fact that it reminds you of a Mateba Unica 6 means you've got a knack for recognizing Emilio Ghisoni's handiwork. The Unica 6 (autorevolver) of which you speak was designed by the very same individual.
I think that particular gun is ugly and I am not a revolver fan anyways but I like the idea of lowering the bore. I am female so I probably notice it more than guys do but the lower the bore the less muzzle flip and the easier it is on your wrists. Not to mention faster follow up shots. That is my only gripe about my Sig. If the bore was lower like on a Glock, it would flip less and be easier to control. You gotta trust me on this guys, it really makes a difference.
@nowthisisstupid No doubt but I really think it effects guys less. For the girls, it really helps lots. I guess what I am saying is it is a minor factor for guys and a major factor for girls. Thats all :)
High bore axis effects alot of people differently I know women with strong grips and men with weak. It's really not just a factor for women or less of an factor for men it effects alot of people in alot of different ways. But what I am saying is the lower bore axis is going to effectively put more recoil directly into the palm of your hand instead of diverting the muzzle up. I honestly think the best way to go is standard barrel axis and muzzle brake, more aggressive for the needs of the person.
@nowthisisstupid I totally agree with that. I like that they are experaminting with that but I am not sure I would like it. I like a low muzzle but not sure I would like it that low. Then again, I have never tried it. LOL My perfect gun would be a DA/SA Glock with a Sig 226 grip that has a brake. :) And I think that revolver looks funny LOL Actually, I would love a Sig with a brake or compensated. Whatever you want to call it. Not that a 226 is that bad but every little bit helps speed/accuracy
@nowthisisstupid I love 1911s too but .45 is a bit much for me to go out & shoot for fun. I know they make some in 9mm but I think that is a bit sacreligious. LOL A 1911 is a .45 in my mind. They actually fit me well too and they are great fun but I am done after about 30 rounds of .45
Yeah I had a XD in the 4.5 tactical chamber for .45 ACP and it had substantial recoil because of the polymer I traded it and now have a P95 the XD suffered from a high bore axis though and had alot of mismanaged flip. But I the 1911 is heavy enough it handles the recoil well and the bore axis is quite low.
@nowthisisstupid You know, I am not saying flip is not a factor for men because It is. I am saying, on average, women have smaller wrists. Glock came out with a gun vented on top and every woman I know that is serious about shooting thought it was great. Myself included. Many men didn't like it because of excessive flash ect. Women thought the disadvantages of some gas venting out the top were worth it to minimize the flip. Many men did not. It is just an average size& strength issue
@55Superfly55 He may be laughing his ass at your sentence. Take a look at Ghisoni's past productions, and tell me the Rhino has the same fit, finish and build quality.
It's not by any stretch of imagination.
Calling the Rhino "a Ghisoni production" is like saying that J.M. Browning is responsible for Norinco's 1911 quality.
is this just to be different? or does this offer some sort of improvement to revolver technology... if this improves anything about the revolvers operation, accuracy, recoil... etc then i'll be on board but if it doesn't then its just an ugly oddity for collectors... any insight? - i'll look it you some time tonight and really check it out
this was a design imrovement over the world's wide range of revolvers. wich is.. shootability.
Semiauto pistols always struggle to lower the barrel in the shooter's grip to reduce recoil AND muzzle rise, while the only way to do such in revolvers is to.. fire from the most bottom down chamber. It's the closest to the shooter's wrist, and reduces muzzle rise dramatically. Follow-up shots are fired faster.
That is one weird ass lookin gun right there so out of the ordinary. I wouldnt buy it thats fersur. too many mechanical gears goin on. might coz a serious problem IMO.
Interesting looking design, now correct me if I'm wrong, but would that possibly reduce recoil? Trying to figure out what the pros would be to the design of a revolver being like this rather than a typical styled revolver. 5*s
@GunWebsites do you think this design could be implemented into a semi auto handgun? I know there was the Mateba, but if you look at a 1911, do you think the barrel could somehow be lower such as this? I've thought about it for a while, and still can't come up with anything that might work. Besides, it would look funky.
now wheres the 44 mag version thats what it should of came out in the first place with
MrTheree 4 days ago
revolvers are not just for shooting :D
ahenryb1 1 month ago
You see the perfect place for a built-in laser?
Thunkful2 1 month ago
ha well i dont think this is what Samuel Colt had in mind when he created the revolver LOL
a real nice construction, LOVE it, WANT one
greetings from Sweden!
rammsteinlover1337 2 months ago
Nella mia lingua chiappa è culo :D
Geckoassassin 2 months ago
wow revolvers do have a future
you can bet this will be on my side when the robot revolution begins
grimcro 3 months ago 2
@grimcro
but robots will develop revolvers that shoot from the top and bottom..
GunWebsites 3 months ago 5
@GunWebsites Robots will shoot LAZERPEWPEW revolvers.
UTLonghornPistol 11 hours ago
@grimcro the robots will be running windows terminator so you're safe... blue screen of death to the rescue.
cwross1976 1 month ago
those Chiappa Rhino looks huge foe a revolver.
SuperRip7 4 months ago
Trigun!!!
boboriginal 5 months ago 3
The cylinders look so thin on the outside.
oilhammer04 5 months ago
it's a mocktaber from ghost in the shell!
pinfold1000 5 months ago
Does anyone else think of Vash the Stampede when they look at this magnificent weapon?
leroyatleroys 6 months ago 4
@leroyatleroys no
andyk13089 4 months ago
This is number one on my short list. Insanely smart - I hope we can get some speed loaders soon.
snappydoodad 8 months ago
As soon as I have enough cash I'm gona buy one of these mofo's!!!! Hell Ya!!!
lathargicrunnerzzz 8 months ago
Thumbs up if you think it looks like the gun from Trigun
Ivan0o 8 months ago 3
@Ivan0o Thats why I want one.
mythicalcaesar 8 months ago
... hm-mm, Vash the Stampedes'(Trigun) version had a full bull barrel & lug.
High cool-factor. The range'll tell, fielding the weapon too. I'm sure it'll scare the shit outta the badguy/robbery victim when she's pulled-
Guns such as these make me desire 2 own a gas forge, milling/lathe - 2
cut block steel & bar-stock into a modern version of that War Between the States
defence masterpiece- The Le Mat.
Only I think my versns should be in 20,16ga. & upper-.357/.38, .45ACP, .44sp/mg
.327mg...
SittingMooseShaman 9 months ago
Dope.
faithlikeachild26 10 months ago
Make a not as ugly grip and I'll buy one.
TheAKOmnicide 10 months ago
make it smaller
Bill1275w 11 months ago
GET TA DA CHIAPPA!
PunchRockGroin 11 months ago
love the design...
weaponeer 11 months ago
Whats up with all these negative comments? I cant even find one to buy let alone shoot. How Can this many people begiving negative comments on something I know they havent even shot?
Ls7colorado 1 year ago 4
@Ls7colorado its the internet
BestTits 11 months ago
is it just me or does this gun look like it has a ton more parts than the average wheel gun??
roudy1689 1 year ago
i want one,but at no more than a $500.00 price tag!
bobsolla 1 year ago
How do you make that gun safe after cocking it ?
bronxman4u2000 1 year ago
@bronxman4u2000 I own one, and after you cock it the trigger falls back to the fire position and there is no safety switch. So you better have a place for the bullet to go or de-cock it to holster it or you will shot your whole leg off!
TheShotgunExpresss 7 months ago
@ DJdude250
It's supposed to reduce recoil by lowering the center of gravity, and is supposed to improve fast aiming for being more in center with your arm.
As for the sights, a 1 inch parallax difference is not a big deal for a gun that's mostly for close quarter self-defense situations.
If you are more into competitive shooting then you might be better with a gun having a less powerful round, longer barrel and fully adjustable sights.
kirk85kirk 1 year ago
I dont understand what was gained by making the bottom chamber of the cylinder be where it fires. all its doing is fucking up the sights
DJdude250 1 year ago
thats exactly what it does recoil is reduced greatly allowing a faster sight picture.
theserpentshallwin 1 year ago
The problem with a .357 isn't recoil (which I've never found to be a problem), but with blast. Someone said the price of this monstrosity is in the $800-ish. If it goes for that, I hope people stay away from it in droves.
MuzzleBlast357 1 year ago
It'd be a great $250 .357...if they work. It looks like it was made in Russia...er...make that a Russian prison! I'd like one for my Saturday Night Special collection. Seems to be a bit bigger than my Davis P-32.
MuzzleBlast357 1 year ago
I love the "shit your pants" factor of these guns. Even the 4 incher looks huge!
MrBallistics 1 year ago
does anybody else think they swiped the design from the mateba model six?
mcmelonmaster 1 year ago
nice getting booth baby to give you information on it...so i suggest researching>.>
vampire847 1 year ago
how much is this?
SteveBKNY 1 year ago
It is not a coincidence that the Rhino and the Mateba Autorevolver look similar. They were both designed by Emilio Ghisoni.
Steiner789 1 year ago 10
what is the trigger pull like and is it possible to release the hammer manually with out letting the gun fire?
ClarTV 1 year ago
I was just reading about the snubbie Rhino in G&A. Interesting little gun - actually looks like a rhinoceros... The crazy number of moving parts in that trigger mechanism just makes me cringe, though. Offhand, its complexity just seems to kind of negate the simplicity-based reliability that people like so much about revolvers in the first place.
FlyingPancreas 1 year ago
idk, the handle looks a little short, but other than that I like the idea of having a very low barrel like that, it theoretically should make hot .357 loads more manageable
schnips074 1 year ago
Well.. nothing I would buy, but I think it's cool that some guys try to improve current weapon systems... I'd love to shoot one.
schubidubap 1 year ago
Is it possible to decock the hammer once it's been cocked? It looked as if the cocking mechanism went back to the forward position.
Riflemanm16a2 1 year ago
Comment removed
RadarGuidedVermin 1 year ago
Ugly as sin. I want one.
HarsanRonyo 1 year ago 26
@HarsanRonyo AHAHAHAH @ your comment.
MRpipeherdown 1 year ago
I like the idea of a 6-o'clock shooter, but the excess parts worries me....
Also, would you be able to safely de-cock a single action once the hammer is cocked back?
Seems kinda weird that the hammer won't move while using the double action.
98snakeeater 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In italian, "chiappa" means buttock!!!!!!
RAFtheRAPPER93 1 year ago
In italian, "chiappa" means buttock!!!!!!
RAFtheRAPPER93 1 year ago
it practically IS a Mateba, as the designer was the same man who worked on one of the Unica model
koeix2 1 year ago
Wayyyyy to many parts to wear out or break going on here,and itll shoot at least an inch low at close range which is how you will use it anyway. No sir,I dont like it....
MrWer1138 1 year ago
Sweet, Can't wait until these are available in Canada.
norcofreerider604 1 year ago
It's an interesting idea, but the height of the sights above the bore is really big compared to the typical set up. If this were a significant improvement it would probably have been successful already. JMHO.
praharin 1 year ago
Can the snub-nosed version fit in an ankle holster?
Kersey475 1 year ago
this revolver is based of the mateba auto revolver, it uses the lower bore design to reduce felt recoil by lowering the bore axis.
weerd2normal 1 year ago
I can't find these anywhere, have they been released yet? Or are they just in limited supply like the mateba's?
Hibryd7 1 year ago
Looks interesting. However, there are a lot more moving parts in that trigger group. A lot more can go wrong.
anointedsword 1 year ago
i am liking this revolver ^^ it does not look like the "average" revolver but i do like it ^^
i think they come out in may ?
is that correct ?
RoyalAlba1 1 year ago
the rhino and mateba were made by the same guy dipshits
navysealinsane 1 year ago
I messed around with the display models at SHOT. the DA trigger was awesome! And the gun was very light (aluminum) Im very interested in buying one, Except for the pricing scheme as you pay more for longer barrel lengths LOL
SNUBNOSESAM 1 year ago
I don't know much abouit guns, so what would be the advanatage of a lower barrel?
mrpopenfresh 1 year ago
According to blue press, "The revolver shoots from the bottom cylinder. It makes for a configuration that's quite out of the ordinary, plus a much lower felt recoil." (2010 shot show).
spoonbot7 1 year ago
The concept is that the recoil is more into your palm and not above your wrist as in all pistols and revolvers. That is the idea anyway.
frankgon4 1 year ago
When will they be released?
I'd like to try see a 2" version in person.
Asmo6 1 year ago
Looks like they "borrowed" a few design ideas from the Mateba Autorevolver. Too bad it's just the looks and not the actual mechanics - guess I've to keep looking for a used one then... :(
maosw 1 year ago
@maosw This is supposedly designed by the same designer as the Mateba, hence the similarities
Derkis 1 year ago
@Derkis Not supposedly, actually!
ButtPoopWiggle 1 year ago
Comment removed
chulski2 1 year ago
@maosw The Rhino and Mateba were both designed by the same person, Mr Emilio Ghisoni.
7thCavScout 1 year ago
i like it
superassassin47 1 year ago
Thats really too expensive for an unproven firearm and design. You expect to pay $800-$1000 for a Colt or S&W revolver, but nothing else seems to match their proven quality and value-especially long-term. Even Ruger's big revolvers are not that expensive, but they are great quality and value.
I do think its tough lookin' though. Different enough that maybe it could catch on.
theWHIPLASH 2 years ago
This is actually a design that has been made in Russia for decades, so it is sort of proven - except I think they used to explode the lower strap right above the trigger finger occasionally. Not good. But I don't know much about them. If you search the net you will find it. Maybe the design is reliable we'd have to look it up. Now, Chiappa on the other hand...
closetpunk2006 2 years ago
yeah i think it is more of a novelty piece, something that they would use in some futuristic hollywood movie, but I just do not see how its practical.
LavaMountainKat 1 year ago
I agree with you. I suppose though if you pulled one of these out at a shooting range you'd draw a crowd!
I just wish they weren't so expensive. I actually live in Ohio where Chiappa is located in Dayton. I am thinking of stopping by and checking it out. Says on their site that they are a local distributor/dealer. Maybe they'll sell me one at a discount! right...
theWHIPLASH 1 year ago
booo, I got so excited I thought this was a new autorevolver.
Timisso1337 2 years ago
NICE! Love how they did the demo, to see how it works. 5/5
OnlyMeDMG 2 years ago 2
Hmmm, interesting looking, but I think I will stick with my SP101.
boxant 2 years ago
me to
frankgon4 1 year ago
Someone managed to make a revolver complicated... Haha!
But seriously, it looks great!
ALAPINO 2 years ago
Reminds me of the Metaba, only not autorotating.
Nice to see the phsical proto and not a patent or drawing. Been following this one off and on for a little while.
DasBulk 2 years ago
@DasBulk The fact that it reminds you of a Mateba Unica 6 means you've got a knack for recognizing Emilio Ghisoni's handiwork. The Unica 6 (autorevolver) of which you speak was designed by the very same individual.
P.S. Check out the Mateba 2006M.
ButtPoopWiggle 1 year ago
It moves the sights a long ways away from the barrel... Wouldn't that be less accurate?
1PATRI0T 2 years ago
that thing is ugly, over-complicated and over-priced. It would be cool to have a low-axis barrel revolver, but not this one.....
CrotalusKid 2 years ago
WHOAHAHAHA awesome.
jaybeesworld 2 years ago
ugly
fnogyrabyore 2 years ago
Looks like a Mateba.
HiCapacity 2 years ago 2
@HiCapacity
I was just typing that in as I saw your comment!
SavageArms357 2 years ago
Yea dude, cool stuff.
HiCapacity 2 years ago
@HiCapacity The Unica 6 was designed by the same guy! Emilio Ghisoni. Way to pay attention.
ButtPoopWiggle 1 year ago
It looks alot like hellboy's gun...
nowthisisstupid 2 years ago
I dont understand. What is the advantage of this system over a traditional revolver?
MascisMan1 2 years ago
@MascisMan1 The low bore axis would allow for greater accuracy.
SavageArms357 2 years ago
Wow that thing is sweet, looks like something a Transformer would use xD.
DavinDaGeek 2 years ago
I'm missing something. Is this a single or double action revolver?
419WEHRWOLF 2 years ago
THE TRIGUN GUN EXIST
bustakajustin 2 years ago
@bustakajustin yes kid it's called "schofield"
terahybrid 1 year ago
I think that particular gun is ugly and I am not a revolver fan anyways but I like the idea of lowering the bore. I am female so I probably notice it more than guys do but the lower the bore the less muzzle flip and the easier it is on your wrists. Not to mention faster follow up shots. That is my only gripe about my Sig. If the bore was lower like on a Glock, it would flip less and be easier to control. You gotta trust me on this guys, it really makes a difference.
shananagans5 2 years ago
Most of us know that, its common knowledge.
nowthisisstupid 2 years ago
@nowthisisstupid No doubt but I really think it effects guys less. For the girls, it really helps lots. I guess what I am saying is it is a minor factor for guys and a major factor for girls. Thats all :)
shananagans5 2 years ago
High bore axis effects alot of people differently I know women with strong grips and men with weak. It's really not just a factor for women or less of an factor for men it effects alot of people in alot of different ways. But what I am saying is the lower bore axis is going to effectively put more recoil directly into the palm of your hand instead of diverting the muzzle up. I honestly think the best way to go is standard barrel axis and muzzle brake, more aggressive for the needs of the person.
nowthisisstupid 2 years ago
@nowthisisstupid I totally agree with that. I like that they are experaminting with that but I am not sure I would like it. I like a low muzzle but not sure I would like it that low. Then again, I have never tried it. LOL My perfect gun would be a DA/SA Glock with a Sig 226 grip that has a brake. :) And I think that revolver looks funny LOL Actually, I would love a Sig with a brake or compensated. Whatever you want to call it. Not that a 226 is that bad but every little bit helps speed/accuracy
shananagans5 2 years ago
I personally love the 1911, but I am not a big fan of the single stack magazine. I have alot of favorites but the 1911 is my favorite.
nowthisisstupid 2 years ago
@nowthisisstupid I love 1911s too but .45 is a bit much for me to go out & shoot for fun. I know they make some in 9mm but I think that is a bit sacreligious. LOL A 1911 is a .45 in my mind. They actually fit me well too and they are great fun but I am done after about 30 rounds of .45
shananagans5 2 years ago
@shananagans5 American tactical Imports makes a .22 version! neat lil plinker!
Dmajorproductions 2 years ago
Yeah I had a XD in the 4.5 tactical chamber for .45 ACP and it had substantial recoil because of the polymer I traded it and now have a P95 the XD suffered from a high bore axis though and had alot of mismanaged flip. But I the 1911 is heavy enough it handles the recoil well and the bore axis is quite low.
nowthisisstupid 2 years ago
@nowthisisstupid You know, I am not saying flip is not a factor for men because It is. I am saying, on average, women have smaller wrists. Glock came out with a gun vented on top and every woman I know that is serious about shooting thought it was great. Myself included. Many men didn't like it because of excessive flash ect. Women thought the disadvantages of some gas venting out the top were worth it to minimize the flip. Many men did not. It is just an average size& strength issue
shananagans5 2 years ago
Poor Franco Mateba will be rolling in his grave.
What a waste of a great firearm.
TheHiddenPart 2 years ago 8
@TheHiddenPart Exactly, I would be happy if they just reproduced his original pistols.
Saiguy 2 years ago 2
@TheHiddenPart I'm with you :(
Spartan117A1 1 year ago
@TheHiddenPart
The Rhino IS designed by Emilio Ghisoni, the same guy who designed the Mateba... he must be laughing his ass at you!
55Superfly55 1 year ago
@55Superfly55 He may be laughing his ass at your sentence. Take a look at Ghisoni's past productions, and tell me the Rhino has the same fit, finish and build quality.
It's not by any stretch of imagination.
Calling the Rhino "a Ghisoni production" is like saying that J.M. Browning is responsible for Norinco's 1911 quality.
TheHiddenPart 1 year ago
@TheHiddenPart
Emilio Ghisoni designed the Mateba.
Franco Mateba was fabricated by the internet.
Daggur 11 months ago
@Daggur Do you by any chance know what MATEBA stands for? I know..
TheHiddenPart 11 months ago
@TheHiddenPart
Macchine Termo-Balistiche
Could be wrong.
Daggur 11 months ago
@Daggur exactly. Thermo-Ballistical Machines. Doesn't it sound extra cool or what?
TheHiddenPart 11 months ago
is this just to be different? or does this offer some sort of improvement to revolver technology... if this improves anything about the revolvers operation, accuracy, recoil... etc then i'll be on board but if it doesn't then its just an ugly oddity for collectors... any insight? - i'll look it you some time tonight and really check it out
beefyramos 2 years ago
this was a design imrovement over the world's wide range of revolvers. wich is.. shootability.
Semiauto pistols always struggle to lower the barrel in the shooter's grip to reduce recoil AND muzzle rise, while the only way to do such in revolvers is to.. fire from the most bottom down chamber. It's the closest to the shooter's wrist, and reduces muzzle rise dramatically. Follow-up shots are fired faster.
TheHiddenPart 2 years ago
@TheHiddenPart
thank you ... makes perfect sense that it must reduce recoil now. i would imagine that this would be very helpful in the .357 mag
beefyramos 2 years ago
ok that is one really ugly gun.
Forgoten214 2 years ago
That is one weird ass lookin gun right there so out of the ordinary. I wouldnt buy it thats fersur. too many mechanical gears goin on. might coz a serious problem IMO.
pmalveda02 2 years ago
Looks disturbingly like a Mateba, which was hardly a success, actually it was marginally more successful than the gyrojet
DrDeath665 2 years ago 9
@DrDeath665 they have the same designer
nagger221 1 year ago
@DrDeath665 I would buy a gyrojet if they still made the ammo... pretty cool conzept back in the days.
schadavi 1 year ago
is it made of polymar?
GT03235 2 years ago
a "polymer" is a type of chemical structure, not a material
desirefirst 2 years ago
they build guns out of it you dick so call it what you want
GT03235 2 years ago 2
i own one there sweet little revolvers
stickandrun 2 years ago
@stickandrun Does yours have the barrel?
shooter348 2 years ago
If they are going to change the design why not incorporate a safe "de-cocking mechanism. It looks like the arch in the grip is in the way.
Derail07 2 years ago
cool new design. gotta look into this.
dakine425 2 years ago
Interesting looking design, now correct me if I'm wrong, but would that possibly reduce recoil? Trying to figure out what the pros would be to the design of a revolver being like this rather than a typical styled revolver. 5*s
XxLeggZxX 2 years ago
I think thats the idea, lower the bore axis so it's pushing into your arm, not your wrist
GunWebsites 2 years ago
Makes sense, thanks for the quick reply!
XxLeggZxX 2 years ago
@GunWebsites do you think this design could be implemented into a semi auto handgun? I know there was the Mateba, but if you look at a 1911, do you think the barrel could somehow be lower such as this? I've thought about it for a while, and still can't come up with anything that might work. Besides, it would look funky.
USMCTC2012 1 year ago