Research on operation "Amalgam Virgo" a joint military exercise between the US and Canadians 3 months before 911. Its purpose was to neutralise any Third World united cruise missiles launched off a rogue freighters in the Gulf of Mexico. Amalgam Virgo utilised the use of remote controlled planes being used as weapons against targets in the US. It even had a photo of Patsy Bin Laden on the cover!! It proves they had a strategy, and the means to deliver such an attack 3 months before 911
@HeresiarcaLLDM.. watch part 4 and discover that these man-made (ovni) inventions are capable of changing from solid to non-solid matter.. Russia is technologically well prepared.. so the Pravda is likely not a complete reliable source of information.. :)
the hunting planes (i dont know english word, but those war plane who fly after normal plane in case they fly out of their regular fly plan ) were on exercice exactly on the 11/9 in the north-east of the country. no war plane could have fly after the "hallucinated planes" for what reason ? so they can't figure out that they were illusion? man... I still believe WTC was demolition, but fake planes, come on. (anyway, I think your videos are interesting, i'm open to learn anything i can from them)
@dnh6967.. lol.. you stare at the absolute visual evidence of holographic plasma planes and you still deny it?.. you are nominated for the absolute traumatic conditioned mind award.. congratulations!!.. :) ..however.. thanks for the appreciation of my work.. have you seen.. >> watch?v=pZ6vgo11Sto .. maybe that will help you to get rid of your trauma based conditioning.. and I am not sarcastic here, but very serious.
@Martin958.. no.. it's all (dense) plasma in a certain cubic space (invisible light bending/absorbing) matrix wherein a continuous implosive inverse radiating force of electromagnetic waves.. more is explained in part 4.. part 5 will be my greatest and likely last challenge.. thanks.. :)
This is so good. Did you notice the orb on the building in front of the tower? These things are demon/alien entities. We are in for a wild ride I'm afraid.
@ella5024..thank you Ella. If you stop the video at 00:25 mins you'll see that the reflecting object is not an "orb" but a substantial part on top of the building..you can also verify this by observing the black edges around the object when zoomed in..furthermore the object does not have the moving characteristics of an "orb"..however..you can clearly observe these reflecting plasma "orbs" in the smoke..so yes..there were orbs all around that area that day..it will be discussed in my last video.
@nibirushock Orbs don't have to move, they can just sit there. Watch the latest movie by spacecowboy1954. The exact same orbs are on fake planes all the time.
@ella5024.. I love the spacecowboy1954 productions.. just like I love the videos of FakePlane and 72kyros (Madmod72).. the highly conductive plasma "orbs" I am talking about are controlled by electromagnetic centrifugal forces induced by scalar microwave RF emissions.. very sophisticated technology acting like an organism.. a light projection tool and exotic weapon system in one.. :)
@nibirushock These bioplasmas can take things down on a molecular level. They do the animal mutilations, and there is no blood. They cut between the cells. The crop circles are another thing they do. They did 9/11, and it was turned to dust because they and only they have the ability to do this. They were all over it.
@ella5024.. yes.. they used that technology on 9/11.. thanks for mentioning that.. the final conclusion on that and so much more will be in my last video.. after that its time for me to move on.. to the next level.. :)
Have you noticed that the orb surrounded by black was on top of the building in front of the tower in the first part of the video. Watch spacecowboy1954 videos to see more of these black rimmed orbs. They were on the building, too, melting steel beams. Watch the video I have in my favorites, the first one on there. Watch at :18 and you'll see the orb. They are demons though, not Bluebeam.
@papiiuenvy186.. I believe davyro66 was not commenting about the GTE Airfone units that were used in the planes.. but the cellphone use in the UAL93.. please read my previous comment about that.
question so what happened to the people that were on the plane, the ones that called there families and stuff? they lied about the whole thing and committed suicide for our country?
@papiiuenvy186.. it could have been a fair question.. if you did not put it in such a mean and nasty manner.. the passengers as well as the flight attendents gave away clues as to what was happening on their planes.. they all were true heroes.. and for a plausable explanation as to what might have happened.. we will have to look into the fourth state of matter.. I can not prove it.. yet.. but I am certainly able to illustrate it.. in my next video.. the next month or 2.. be patient..
@nibirushock i want not trying to be nasty or mean, just curious. i will be looking forward to more of you videos. ( i been subscribed to you for some time now =) )
@papiiuenvy186 There wasn't the technology available to ring from a plane with a cell phone proving they were a hoax,before you say anything please research this fact it wasn't until 2006 that a cell phone could be used only up until 10,000ft.A lot of the people supposedly on the planes didn't exist this is also proven.
@davyro66.. I know..thanks for bringing that up.. I wouldn't call it a hoax because there was more.. we have to take in account 2 cellphone calls from CeeCee Lyles and Edward Felt.. both as passengers on the UAL93.. both phoned at 09:58 am.. both supposedly in the back of the UAL93.. the flight data recorder information reads an altitude of around 7500 feet at that time.. descending to around 5000 feet at 09:59 am and climbing to 10000 feet at 10:02 am.. I'll take it all with me.. and more.. :)
(continued).. @davyro66.. needless to say the least .. there must have been something very wrong with that flight data recorder.. you should try it in a flight simulator.. the fact that it is possible is in itself a possible clue as to how to program such a device.. :)
@ChrisArcen.. no.. the object is clearly casting its own shadow whilst forming itself from underneath.. therefore it is not the sunlight reflecting of a solid attached body neither of the framework or any thickening in the framework itself. If you stop the video at 01:27-01:28 one can clearly observe such "wing support and landing gear" is not even there.. but thanks for the picture and the try.. :)
@nibirushock You cannot see anything clearly in this picture and apparently you do not understand what a optical illusion is. The wing support and landing gear bay is there, notice the your mysterious "cylinder" does not show up until the plane get in front of the smoke. It was reflecting light before that but it could not be seen against the blue sky.
That is not a hologram, it is a real 767 hitting the tower and all the BS you can come up with will not change that fact.
@ChrisArcen.. yes you can see everything clearly, so that's not an excuse.. I know very well how to discern an optical illusion from deep-rooted notions. You ignore the visual evidence in this video..you are not objective.. the object is clearly not there at 01:27-01:28 ..it's only after the "plane" furthers its route towards the building, the object becomes visible.. the explosion cloud or smoke is behind the "plane" and thus does not have any influence on the appearance of "plane"..(continued)
(continued).. @ChrisArcen.. besides that, the object clearly starts to develop from nothing well before the "plane" is passing that smoke..your argument that it was reflecting light and therefore could not be seen against the blue sky is downright ludicrous..the last words you typed says it all..you're a denialist..you don't want to accept the facts because in your mind it simply cannot and must not be a holographic projection..how the mind tends to preserve itself from its outdated reality.. :)
@nibirushock In you mind you would not believe they were real planes if you were on one the planes.
You don't want to believe 19 men could hijack 4 planes and do what they did because if they did you would not be able to sleep at night, knowing that it could happen again. Just like all the other conspiracy theorist out there.
@ChrisArcen.. you're worse then a denialist..you purposely ignore what I commented at 11:45 mins onwards..that there was a plane swap and the reacquired target was the holographic "plane." I never said that the planes weren't hijacked..and that's all documented, yet you outright lie about that..you deliberately falsely accuse me..therefore you are indeed a worthless figure..what can I say man.. I am thankful you just showed what you're worth..don't be a coward and delete your comment afterwards.
@nibirushock The plane would not have affected any trees because they were hundreds of feet in the air. The planes disappearing off of the radar screen does not mean that they disappeared; it just means that they were flying to low for the radar to be able to detect them.
HAARP is not a weapon and it cannot cause earthquakes, holographic planes, storms… HAARP's transmitter only puts out about 3.6 Megawatts but a single bolt of lightning is over 1 Gigawatt.
@ChrisArcen.. lol..please stop making a fool of yourself..the holographic plane was flying so low that the eyewitness had to duck in her van..it was making no sound..it's completely inconsistent with the flight data recorder information which showed it was making a nosedive from 10000 feet at 10:02 am. Flight 93 was on primary radar..not the holographic "plane"..and as this video shows..they even received a transponder return at 10:05 am..its altitude was 8200 feet at that time.. (continued)..
(cont).. and remarkably they received its transponder return (same code as before) 2 mins after the flight data recorder crash..its undeniable that these data evidences don't match with eachother..the visual evidence in this video is clear..holographic "planes" were used that day..exotic weaponry was used as well which will be shown in my next video next month..everything you commented so far is garbage..regarding global HAARP facilities and capabilities watch my video here: watch?v=9XnGk9fz8gM
..for any real researcher.. take a look at the flight data recoder information of the UAL93.. download the pdf file here: bit.ly /nk4gRw (remove space).. according to it, the plane never went below 5000 feet before it crashed...
@nibirushock Wow funny to find this chris chemtard troll on here talking shit i have some interesting video of planes or whatever the hell it is when i upload it i will send it to you great job on these vids there is obviously something to this .
Superb revelations . . . this is a very concise and well-presented justification for the hologram theory in regards to the Twin Tower attacks on 9/11/2001. I think that simply adhering to a "No Plane" position is faulty, as it appears there WERE planes in the air that day that the official story claims crashed into the WTC. Of course, I would love to know what happened to those planes if they were replaced with ghost surrogates! The info on the SDI and HAARP was also very informative, BRAVO!
@KoldShadow.. thanks for the appreciation man.. 9/11 was a manifestation of power... to those who understood the message...what they are military, techologically and psychologically capable of... with regards to what might have happened to the pilots and the passengers...that's a very dark territory of which I am not certain I should enter into it any further as I already did... but I will send you something privately...then you know what I mean.. keep smiling.. :)
Hey, I'm just seeing your reply now, so I will check out my inbox and get back to you. A documentary I saw purported that the planes were directed to an air force base, and the pilots and passengers were executed. Of course I'm going to compare that to what you've sent me because that's one of the aspects of my own personal inference of what really happened on 9/11 that is still yearning to be formed. Thanks for your guidance and insight, I value it highly!
Nope, not buying that . . . the actual commercial flights weren't involved in the attacks, I've seen too much legitimate alternative research that establishes black ops craft used as projectiles, as well as the likelihood that those commercial planes could not have stayed intact that low to the ground flying that fast.
dude i like your work, good docuementry video but next time please when someone is trying explain the theory or history(within the clip) , you should lower the music volume , other than that your explaining method and technique is good keep up the good work
@inzibhai.. thanks for the appreciation.. concerning the music/speech ratio... I like it when I can hear the speaker just above the music... it's a personal thing.. I am sure you could hear and understand every word spoken in this video.. but I will keep your suggestion in mind when creating any follow-up videos.. thanks.. :)
at the beginning of the story, the light u see on the impact was due to missile so what next ? when u see the light the plane is already impacting the builing... his nose desappear into and the light is just the impact i think^^
@Plqy4Fun.. no man.. you're wrong.. the flash appears briefly and disappears completely before any damage is done to the building and whilst the nose of the holographic plane is already penetrated into the building.. it's only when the engines enter the building the explosives are ignited.. still a much better timing as with the first crash.. but thanks for trying.. :)
@nibirushock i m not trying to do anything, i just see than this video is a big fake ;) u don't see the impact of the wings @2:15 ? u think a missile + a hologram can have the shape of a plane^^ if i would like to continue the story @4:31 the guy want to show a missile and find what he want ! but it's only light reflexion.. inversion of color and we have a missile... my english is not good enough to continue with u but juste the shape in the building @2:15 convinced me thant it's a real plane.
@Plqy4Fun.. you deny all the visual evidence and what I commented to you previously..that's not a fair and objective attitude..if you stop the video at 02:14..just before the "wings" and the "engines" enter the building..one can clearly observe the nose of the "plane" already penetrated into the building without any damage done yet..and after the flash has completely disappeared. Regarding the "plane" and the "missile" at 04:31 onwards..take a good look at the right sided engine..(continued)..
(continued).. @Plqy4Fun.. it's an obvious holographic projection as well.. furthermore absolutely NOTHING is fake in this video..only parts zoomed in and in slow motion in order to clarify videofragments. If you take a good look at 02:14 after the "wing" on the right side of the "plane" has penetrated the building..one can clearly observe portions of the building where this "wing" supposedly has sliced through, are still completely intact! An even better view at 02:51.. so..have a nice day.. :)
@Plqy4Fun.. when reading your comment again with regards to the "missile" at 04:31 mins onwards being "only a light reflection" I had a little chuckle to myself and just had to answer you on that as well..please watch at 04:29 mins onwards and what do we see on this so called "light reflection?"..a blinking red light underneath it!..now ain't that remarkable.. it is without question the only most extraordinary "light reflection" with a blinking red light..that's all..just to clarify matters.. :)
@Plqy4Fun.. 02:50 - 02:52 no impact of the wings at all sorry.. but a much better timing on the ignition of explosives as compared to the first "impact" >> watch?v=9XnGk9fz8gM at 02:35 mins onwards.. a clear holographic projection penetrating the building.. exposing a quick flash of its holographic light source.. you completely ignore the rest of the visual evidence.. as well as the air traffic tapes and eyewitness account.. not much of an objective scientific approach.. :)
Logic tells me that to create a deception like 9/11 you use the simplest possible method involving least number of personnel to minimize the loose lips risk. You have 4 ostensibly hijacked planes, you use them. If the buildings are pre-wired the planes will be sufficient for your needs.
@FirstUsedBooks.. this logic depends from which perspective you reason and it will influence drawn conclusions.. if you have a certain plan and you have the technology in order to create a certain outcome.. you will use it.. that outcome could not be guaranteed by the use of regular planes.. :)
Not sure I'm ready to buy into holograms. I've always wondered whether the light reflected off the building couldn't have come from a nose-mounted floodlight designed to come on automatically at a low level of light intensity. As for things like changing engines, disappearing wings etc., I'd suggest googling and looking at "jpg compression artifacts".
@FirstUsedBooks.. nah... the flash is simply the brief exposure of the holographic light source... one can clearly observe it as a projection of light... that disappears completely when the holographic "plane" proceeds to penetrate the buidling... as far as "jpg compression artifacts".. first this is a video.. second I can guarantee you.. you will not find sidewards changing engines in opposition to the body frame of the plane in that category.. (continued)
(continued).. @FirstUsedBooks.. however.. you will find some very interesting information about negative refraction of light in holography... as hinted at the end of this video... but thanks for trying.. :)
@FirstUsedBooks They weren't holograms, though the technology is there. This was a case of CGI, in real time. Please serch "Illuminati and Dajjal" on you tube. I think it is video 3. Welcome to the rabbit hole, invite your friends.
@peacefulpatriots.. yes they were holographic projections.. as clarified in this video.. enough eye witnesses mistakenly identified them as real planes.. you can't really blame them for that.. and then ofcourse.. watch the video properly.. undoubtedly the 'growing' object underneath the plane as seen on different videos is a by-effect of the disintegration of the holographic projection.
@nibirushock Sorry, but there were several reporters that saw NO PROJECTILE whatsoever. AND, if you will watch the video I mentioned, you will see what I mean. People running around yelling "HOLOGRAM"! will only serve to make the truth community look foolish. Like I said, I am aware the technology exists, and is in use NOW. BUT, holograms were not used 9/11. Look at the video. Peace
@peacefulpatriots.. no need to get emotional over this.. you are referring to this video: The Illuminati & Dajjal Part 4 (No Planes on September 11) watch?v=ALZMHT49akw
Yes, it's a great video.. especially interesting is the "nose out" at 09:42 mins onwards which only confirms the use of a holographic device/projection.. nobody is yelling hologram anywhere.. why do you say that?.. in fact this video rationally provides visual evidence that holographic techniques were used that day.. peace.. :)
(continued).. @peacefulpatriots.. furthermore.. you must include all the facts if you research this event.. and a very important one is what the air traffic tapes and transcripts reveal.. is that they had the "planes" targeted on primary radar.. this is a fact.. if there were no planes at all.. this would simply be impossible.. :)
u the man ! nothing your viewers havnt figured out ,but defenitly sums it all up in 1 video for nasayers...as with all your other videos...PLEASE GO TO THIS guys CH.
Sorry, I'm not convinced & I got bored w/ these videos. but thanks for sharing.
Tobious3000 1 hour ago
Research on operation "Amalgam Virgo" a joint military exercise between the US and Canadians 3 months before 911. Its purpose was to neutralise any Third World united cruise missiles launched off a rogue freighters in the Gulf of Mexico. Amalgam Virgo utilised the use of remote controlled planes being used as weapons against targets in the US. It even had a photo of Patsy Bin Laden on the cover!! It proves they had a strategy, and the means to deliver such an attack 3 months before 911
TyroneSandalphon 3 months ago
@HeresiarcaLLDM.. thanks for your comment.. yes.. they both have that technology.. since the start of Project Pandora decades ago..
nibirushock 3 months ago
@HeresiarcaLLDM.. watch part 4 and discover that these man-made (ovni) inventions are capable of changing from solid to non-solid matter.. Russia is technologically well prepared.. so the Pravda is likely not a complete reliable source of information.. :)
nibirushock 3 months ago
the hunting planes (i dont know english word, but those war plane who fly after normal plane in case they fly out of their regular fly plan ) were on exercice exactly on the 11/9 in the north-east of the country. no war plane could have fly after the "hallucinated planes" for what reason ? so they can't figure out that they were illusion? man... I still believe WTC was demolition, but fake planes, come on. (anyway, I think your videos are interesting, i'm open to learn anything i can from them)
dnh6967 3 months ago
@dnh6967.. lol.. you stare at the absolute visual evidence of holographic plasma planes and you still deny it?.. you are nominated for the absolute traumatic conditioned mind award.. congratulations!!.. :) ..however.. thanks for the appreciation of my work.. have you seen.. >> watch?v=pZ6vgo11Sto .. maybe that will help you to get rid of your trauma based conditioning.. and I am not sarcastic here, but very serious.
nibirushock 3 months ago
Could the cylinder shape at 2:50 followed by an explosion not be the cruise missile that was used being masked by the hologram?
Martin958 4 months ago
@Martin958.. no.. it's all (dense) plasma in a certain cubic space (invisible light bending/absorbing) matrix wherein a continuous implosive inverse radiating force of electromagnetic waves.. more is explained in part 4.. part 5 will be my greatest and likely last challenge.. thanks.. :)
nibirushock 4 months ago
Thank you so much for these videos. So much.
AndyvanKayne 4 months ago 2
This is so good. Did you notice the orb on the building in front of the tower? These things are demon/alien entities. We are in for a wild ride I'm afraid.
ella5024 6 months ago 3
@ella5024..thank you Ella. If you stop the video at 00:25 mins you'll see that the reflecting object is not an "orb" but a substantial part on top of the building..you can also verify this by observing the black edges around the object when zoomed in..furthermore the object does not have the moving characteristics of an "orb"..however..you can clearly observe these reflecting plasma "orbs" in the smoke..so yes..there were orbs all around that area that day..it will be discussed in my last video.
nibirushock 5 months ago 3
@nibirushock Orbs don't have to move, they can just sit there. Watch the latest movie by spacecowboy1954. The exact same orbs are on fake planes all the time.
ella5024 5 months ago
@ella5024.. I love the spacecowboy1954 productions.. just like I love the videos of FakePlane and 72kyros (Madmod72).. the highly conductive plasma "orbs" I am talking about are controlled by electromagnetic centrifugal forces induced by scalar microwave RF emissions.. very sophisticated technology acting like an organism.. a light projection tool and exotic weapon system in one.. :)
nibirushock 5 months ago 3
@nibirushock These bioplasmas can take things down on a molecular level. They do the animal mutilations, and there is no blood. They cut between the cells. The crop circles are another thing they do. They did 9/11, and it was turned to dust because they and only they have the ability to do this. They were all over it.
ella5024 5 months ago 3
@ella5024.. yes.. they used that technology on 9/11.. thanks for mentioning that.. the final conclusion on that and so much more will be in my last video.. after that its time for me to move on.. to the next level.. :)
nibirushock 5 months ago 2
@nibirushock This is a great video and I can't wait to see your next one!
ella5024 5 months ago 5
@ella5024.. thanks.. :)
nibirushock 5 months ago
Have you noticed that the orb surrounded by black was on top of the building in front of the tower in the first part of the video. Watch spacecowboy1954 videos to see more of these black rimmed orbs. They were on the building, too, melting steel beams. Watch the video I have in my favorites, the first one on there. Watch at :18 and you'll see the orb. They are demons though, not Bluebeam.
ella5024 6 months ago
..negative refraction of light.. negative index.. do your research.. later.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
@papiiuenvy186.. I believe davyro66 was not commenting about the GTE Airfone units that were used in the planes.. but the cellphone use in the UAL93.. please read my previous comment about that.
nibirushock 6 months ago 3
question so what happened to the people that were on the plane, the ones that called there families and stuff? they lied about the whole thing and committed suicide for our country?
papiiuenvy186 6 months ago
@papiiuenvy186.. it could have been a fair question.. if you did not put it in such a mean and nasty manner.. the passengers as well as the flight attendents gave away clues as to what was happening on their planes.. they all were true heroes.. and for a plausable explanation as to what might have happened.. we will have to look into the fourth state of matter.. I can not prove it.. yet.. but I am certainly able to illustrate it.. in my next video.. the next month or 2.. be patient..
nibirushock 6 months ago 3
@nibirushock i want not trying to be nasty or mean, just curious. i will be looking forward to more of you videos. ( i been subscribed to you for some time now =) )
papiiuenvy186 6 months ago 2
@papiiuenvy186.. okay.. thanks man.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago
@papiiuenvy186 There wasn't the technology available to ring from a plane with a cell phone proving they were a hoax,before you say anything please research this fact it wasn't until 2006 that a cell phone could be used only up until 10,000ft.A lot of the people supposedly on the planes didn't exist this is also proven.
davyro66 6 months ago 3
@davyro66.. I know..thanks for bringing that up.. I wouldn't call it a hoax because there was more.. we have to take in account 2 cellphone calls from CeeCee Lyles and Edward Felt.. both as passengers on the UAL93.. both phoned at 09:58 am.. both supposedly in the back of the UAL93.. the flight data recorder information reads an altitude of around 7500 feet at that time.. descending to around 5000 feet at 09:59 am and climbing to 10000 feet at 10:02 am.. I'll take it all with me.. and more.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 5
(continued).. @davyro66.. needless to say the least .. there must have been something very wrong with that flight data recorder.. you should try it in a flight simulator.. the fact that it is possible is in itself a possible clue as to how to program such a device.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
yeah but there were phones on the plane since the 90's.
papiiuenvy186 6 months ago
The "cylinder shaped object" was just the sunlight reflecting of of the wing support and landing gear bay on the bottom of the plane,
latoro. com/wallpapers/avia/17588-desktop-wallpapers-boeing-767-200.jpg
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen.. no.. the object is clearly casting its own shadow whilst forming itself from underneath.. therefore it is not the sunlight reflecting of a solid attached body neither of the framework or any thickening in the framework itself. If you stop the video at 01:27-01:28 one can clearly observe such "wing support and landing gear" is not even there.. but thanks for the picture and the try.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
@nibirushock You cannot see anything clearly in this picture and apparently you do not understand what a optical illusion is. The wing support and landing gear bay is there, notice the your mysterious "cylinder" does not show up until the plane get in front of the smoke. It was reflecting light before that but it could not be seen against the blue sky.
That is not a hologram, it is a real 767 hitting the tower and all the BS you can come up with will not change that fact.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen.. yes you can see everything clearly, so that's not an excuse.. I know very well how to discern an optical illusion from deep-rooted notions. You ignore the visual evidence in this video..you are not objective.. the object is clearly not there at 01:27-01:28 ..it's only after the "plane" furthers its route towards the building, the object becomes visible.. the explosion cloud or smoke is behind the "plane" and thus does not have any influence on the appearance of "plane"..(continued)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
(continued).. @ChrisArcen.. besides that, the object clearly starts to develop from nothing well before the "plane" is passing that smoke..your argument that it was reflecting light and therefore could not be seen against the blue sky is downright ludicrous..the last words you typed says it all..you're a denialist..you don't want to accept the facts because in your mind it simply cannot and must not be a holographic projection..how the mind tends to preserve itself from its outdated reality.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
@nibirushock In you mind you would not believe they were real planes if you were on one the planes.
You don't want to believe 19 men could hijack 4 planes and do what they did because if they did you would not be able to sleep at night, knowing that it could happen again. Just like all the other conspiracy theorist out there.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen.. you're worse then a denialist..you purposely ignore what I commented at 11:45 mins onwards..that there was a plane swap and the reacquired target was the holographic "plane." I never said that the planes weren't hijacked..and that's all documented, yet you outright lie about that..you deliberately falsely accuse me..therefore you are indeed a worthless figure..what can I say man.. I am thankful you just showed what you're worth..don't be a coward and delete your comment afterwards.
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
@nibirushock The plane would not have affected any trees because they were hundreds of feet in the air. The planes disappearing off of the radar screen does not mean that they disappeared; it just means that they were flying to low for the radar to be able to detect them.
HAARP is not a weapon and it cannot cause earthquakes, holographic planes, storms… HAARP's transmitter only puts out about 3.6 Megawatts but a single bolt of lightning is over 1 Gigawatt.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen.. lol..please stop making a fool of yourself..the holographic plane was flying so low that the eyewitness had to duck in her van..it was making no sound..it's completely inconsistent with the flight data recorder information which showed it was making a nosedive from 10000 feet at 10:02 am. Flight 93 was on primary radar..not the holographic "plane"..and as this video shows..they even received a transponder return at 10:05 am..its altitude was 8200 feet at that time.. (continued)..
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
(cont).. and remarkably they received its transponder return (same code as before) 2 mins after the flight data recorder crash..its undeniable that these data evidences don't match with eachother..the visual evidence in this video is clear..holographic "planes" were used that day..exotic weaponry was used as well which will be shown in my next video next month..everything you commented so far is garbage..regarding global HAARP facilities and capabilities watch my video here: watch?v=9XnGk9fz8gM
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
..for any real researcher.. take a look at the flight data recoder information of the UAL93.. download the pdf file here: bit.ly /nk4gRw (remove space).. according to it, the plane never went below 5000 feet before it crashed...
nibirushock 6 months ago 3
@nibirushock Wow funny to find this chris chemtard troll on here talking shit i have some interesting video of planes or whatever the hell it is when i upload it i will send it to you great job on these vids there is obviously something to this .
dan32749 3 days ago
CC transcribe audio is weird on this lol.
drsvss 6 months ago
quite a remarkable video thank you for compiling this
dbootsthediva 6 months ago 3
@dbootsthediva.. thank you too diva.. that means a lot to me.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 2
Superb revelations . . . this is a very concise and well-presented justification for the hologram theory in regards to the Twin Tower attacks on 9/11/2001. I think that simply adhering to a "No Plane" position is faulty, as it appears there WERE planes in the air that day that the official story claims crashed into the WTC. Of course, I would love to know what happened to those planes if they were replaced with ghost surrogates! The info on the SDI and HAARP was also very informative, BRAVO!
KoldShadow 6 months ago 8
@KoldShadow.. thanks for the appreciation man.. 9/11 was a manifestation of power... to those who understood the message...what they are military, techologically and psychologically capable of... with regards to what might have happened to the pilots and the passengers...that's a very dark territory of which I am not certain I should enter into it any further as I already did... but I will send you something privately...then you know what I mean.. keep smiling.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
@nibirushock
Hey, I'm just seeing your reply now, so I will check out my inbox and get back to you. A documentary I saw purported that the planes were directed to an air force base, and the pilots and passengers were executed. Of course I'm going to compare that to what you've sent me because that's one of the aspects of my own personal inference of what really happened on 9/11 that is still yearning to be formed. Thanks for your guidance and insight, I value it highly!
KoldShadow 4 months ago
@KoldShadow Those planes and all the people were pulverized by over 100 thousand tons of steel and concrete falling on to them.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen
Nope, not buying that . . . the actual commercial flights weren't involved in the attacks, I've seen too much legitimate alternative research that establishes black ops craft used as projectiles, as well as the likelihood that those commercial planes could not have stayed intact that low to the ground flying that fast.
KoldShadow 4 months ago
dude i like your work, good docuementry video but next time please when someone is trying explain the theory or history(within the clip) , you should lower the music volume , other than that your explaining method and technique is good keep up the good work
inzibhai 6 months ago 2
@inzibhai.. thanks for the appreciation.. concerning the music/speech ratio... I like it when I can hear the speaker just above the music... it's a personal thing.. I am sure you could hear and understand every word spoken in this video.. but I will keep your suggestion in mind when creating any follow-up videos.. thanks.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 2
YES! This is like one of the classic nibirushock vids! Could I ask for the title of the piano song that starts around 4:55? If it has a title...
randomizer9900 6 months ago
it's a long fight this one, but we 'll win. thanks sr for this .
latinjoy 6 months ago 8
at the beginning of the story, the light u see on the impact was due to missile so what next ? when u see the light the plane is already impacting the builing... his nose desappear into and the light is just the impact i think^^
Plqy4Fun 6 months ago
@Plqy4Fun.. no man.. you're wrong.. the flash appears briefly and disappears completely before any damage is done to the building and whilst the nose of the holographic plane is already penetrated into the building.. it's only when the engines enter the building the explosives are ignited.. still a much better timing as with the first crash.. but thanks for trying.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 5
@nibirushock i m not trying to do anything, i just see than this video is a big fake ;) u don't see the impact of the wings @2:15 ? u think a missile + a hologram can have the shape of a plane^^ if i would like to continue the story @4:31 the guy want to show a missile and find what he want ! but it's only light reflexion.. inversion of color and we have a missile... my english is not good enough to continue with u but juste the shape in the building @2:15 convinced me thant it's a real plane.
Plqy4Fun 6 months ago
@Plqy4Fun.. you deny all the visual evidence and what I commented to you previously..that's not a fair and objective attitude..if you stop the video at 02:14..just before the "wings" and the "engines" enter the building..one can clearly observe the nose of the "plane" already penetrated into the building without any damage done yet..and after the flash has completely disappeared. Regarding the "plane" and the "missile" at 04:31 onwards..take a good look at the right sided engine..(continued)..
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
(continued).. @Plqy4Fun.. it's an obvious holographic projection as well.. furthermore absolutely NOTHING is fake in this video..only parts zoomed in and in slow motion in order to clarify videofragments. If you take a good look at 02:14 after the "wing" on the right side of the "plane" has penetrated the building..one can clearly observe portions of the building where this "wing" supposedly has sliced through, are still completely intact! An even better view at 02:51.. so..have a nice day.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 5
@Plqy4Fun.. when reading your comment again with regards to the "missile" at 04:31 mins onwards being "only a light reflection" I had a little chuckle to myself and just had to answer you on that as well..please watch at 04:29 mins onwards and what do we see on this so called "light reflection?"..a blinking red light underneath it!..now ain't that remarkable.. it is without question the only most extraordinary "light reflection" with a blinking red light..that's all..just to clarify matters.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 4
2:15 2:16 impact of the wings sorry... Military plane maybe.
Plqy4Fun 6 months ago
@Plqy4Fun.. 02:50 - 02:52 no impact of the wings at all sorry.. but a much better timing on the ignition of explosives as compared to the first "impact" >> watch?v=9XnGk9fz8gM at 02:35 mins onwards.. a clear holographic projection penetrating the building.. exposing a quick flash of its holographic light source.. you completely ignore the rest of the visual evidence.. as well as the air traffic tapes and eyewitness account.. not much of an objective scientific approach.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 7
I cannot think of another truther who can defend their stance better than you.
You woke me up a couple of years ago.
I tell people what is really going on and they look at me like I am crazy.
Just remember, it only takes ONE.
That ONE may be the next Bill Cooper.
Keep up the good work, n-shock.
irishbear76 7 months ago 39
@irishbear76.. thanks man.. very much appreciated.. :)
nibirushock 6 months ago 3
500000000000000000000000000000000* stars
72kyros 7 months ago 3
@72kyros.. thanks man.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago
Great Video! Thanks for showing.
viewer821 7 months ago 5
@viewer821.. thanks man!.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago
7:59..
ritlin 7 months ago
Great vid as always.
TruthSeekingElf 7 months ago 3
@TruthSeekingElf.. thanks.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago 2
Logic tells me that to create a deception like 9/11 you use the simplest possible method involving least number of personnel to minimize the loose lips risk. You have 4 ostensibly hijacked planes, you use them. If the buildings are pre-wired the planes will be sufficient for your needs.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks.. this logic depends from which perspective you reason and it will influence drawn conclusions.. if you have a certain plan and you have the technology in order to create a certain outcome.. you will use it.. that outcome could not be guaranteed by the use of regular planes.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago 12
Not sure I'm ready to buy into holograms. I've always wondered whether the light reflected off the building couldn't have come from a nose-mounted floodlight designed to come on automatically at a low level of light intensity. As for things like changing engines, disappearing wings etc., I'd suggest googling and looking at "jpg compression artifacts".
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks.. nah... the flash is simply the brief exposure of the holographic light source... one can clearly observe it as a projection of light... that disappears completely when the holographic "plane" proceeds to penetrate the buidling... as far as "jpg compression artifacts".. first this is a video.. second I can guarantee you.. you will not find sidewards changing engines in opposition to the body frame of the plane in that category.. (continued)
nibirushock 7 months ago 5
(continued).. @FirstUsedBooks.. however.. you will find some very interesting information about negative refraction of light in holography... as hinted at the end of this video... but thanks for trying.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago 7
@FirstUsedBooks They weren't holograms, though the technology is there. This was a case of CGI, in real time. Please serch "Illuminati and Dajjal" on you tube. I think it is video 3. Welcome to the rabbit hole, invite your friends.
peacefulpatriots 7 months ago
@peacefulpatriots.. yes they were holographic projections.. as clarified in this video.. enough eye witnesses mistakenly identified them as real planes.. you can't really blame them for that.. and then ofcourse.. watch the video properly.. undoubtedly the 'growing' object underneath the plane as seen on different videos is a by-effect of the disintegration of the holographic projection.
nibirushock 7 months ago 6
@nibirushock Sorry, but there were several reporters that saw NO PROJECTILE whatsoever. AND, if you will watch the video I mentioned, you will see what I mean. People running around yelling "HOLOGRAM"! will only serve to make the truth community look foolish. Like I said, I am aware the technology exists, and is in use NOW. BUT, holograms were not used 9/11. Look at the video. Peace
peacefulpatriots 7 months ago
@peacefulpatriots.. no need to get emotional over this.. you are referring to this video: The Illuminati & Dajjal Part 4 (No Planes on September 11) watch?v=ALZMHT49akw
Yes, it's a great video.. especially interesting is the "nose out" at 09:42 mins onwards which only confirms the use of a holographic device/projection.. nobody is yelling hologram anywhere.. why do you say that?.. in fact this video rationally provides visual evidence that holographic techniques were used that day.. peace.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago 5
(continued).. @peacefulpatriots.. furthermore.. you must include all the facts if you research this event.. and a very important one is what the air traffic tapes and transcripts reveal.. is that they had the "planes" targeted on primary radar.. this is a fact.. if there were no planes at all.. this would simply be impossible.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago 17
u the man ! nothing your viewers havnt figured out ,but defenitly sums it all up in 1 video for nasayers...as with all your other videos...PLEASE GO TO THIS guys CH.
btrynsave 7 months ago 3
@btrynsave.. thanks man!.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago
great video keep up the good work :)
Canadian291 7 months ago 4
Thanks appreciate your work...
vashguud 7 months ago 5
@vashguud.. thank you too man.. :)
nibirushock 7 months ago