Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have asked dozens of Baker Backers to provide me with anything but her word to go on and as of this date (1/8/2012) I have seen nothing but her word and misrepresentations of other evidence to support her claims thus far. Perhaps 2012 will be the year pushing books some want to buy into becomes less important than the truth on the JFK assassination. I doubt it though.

  • @guybification I am just a guy who has done 20 + years of research on the JFK assassination ... Fact check her story and if you still buy it I have a few large structures for sale ... I have asked other researchers for an opinion on Judyth and spoken to some people I can prove knew Oswald and her story is either complete fiction or a mixture.. See My article JFK Deep Politics Quarterly Jan 2012 and the notes from Dr. Brown about her (Inspired in part by our conversations) research claims please

  • Video or Text Response??

  • @blindjfk You claim that Judyth's version of events "is nearly as effective a device for misdirection from the truth as Reclaiming History , The Hunt Confession ,The Warren Commission , Barr McClellan , Case Closed , or Ultimate Sacrifice (among dozens of published falsehoods) ."

    But how? I'll admit that even that Hunt's confession places too much on LBJ, making the CIA and its benefactors supposed hapless pawns in Johnson's evil plans.. but I don't find Ms. Baker's story does any such thing.

  • @scorpio888 Video or text response to your question?

  • Some new aspects of Judyth Baker and her statements are discussed at my blog:

    findingjudyth.blogspot.com

  • @pamina58 is the blog address right got judy garland results

  • Anyone who listens to your remarks here may also want to judge Judyth for themselves. They can do so by listening to many interviews she gave in Toronto, where she was covered by CTV, all the newspapers of the city--the Globe and Mail, Star and the Sun. In my opinion, the best interview was by George Freund at Conspiracy Cafe. This box won't let me post links, but the interviews are easily found by searching google. Think for yourselves; don't take the word of a man who is too blind to see. ;-)

  • @QuixoticJoust I can see well enough to know a fraud when I hear one but please research and discover the timing and history of the baker story and notice the parallel evolution with misconceptions in the research community . Baker is not the first author to fabricate a role in the JFK literature. But attack the handicap in the low life manner that someone who supports this garbage would. this is what defends the likes of Mrs. Baker

  • I was with Judyth Baker in Toronto for several days, including the episode in the restaurant where glass appeared in her food. Popeye was only one of a plethora of interviews she had while in Toronto. Judyth tells what happened the summer she was in New Orleans and the fall after she was forced to move back to Florida. My blog reports her statements about what happened in Toronto. My blog is called Quixotic Joust. Just search for "Judyth".

  • Notice I leave everything up

  • to Blind Man: I'd heard just one Black Op radio interview when Anita Langley asked me to do an interview --after I wrote to Prouty.Re:Lee's mastoidectomy SCAR:it was NOT bone damage that was removed in the USSR,Minsk Hospital.That was impossible.YOU mixed up the hiding of Lee's mastoid SCAR that I reported w/ removing the BONE defect (on mastoid itself)that was seen intact in the exhumation.You thus conflate,confuse & corrupt my testimony.Why didn't you contact me and do an accurate analysis?

  • @judythvbaker I am an honest researcher and I think you would not be happy with the results I am not completely blind btw and I will not accept puff ball answers that anyone who has read the literature as is obvious by what I have observed in past interviews of yours . If this is you. After all . I want the story to be true but as I recently discussed with a well known expert on the assassination I think the narrative is an embellishment of someones minor brush with a historical figure

  • @judythvbaker It is nearly 2 am here but I will say the same thing I have said to your backers I will send you a private message with all of my personal contact information and I will at a time whenever I am free schedule with you to see or hear anything you think is important on the JFK case. and all I have been given so far is proof you worked at the coffee co. and nonsense . So if you are Mrs. Baker and are willing to be civil I will gladly take the time to be educated one way or the other.

  • Recently while visiting Canada Baker claims an attempt was made on her life with ground up broken glass... The enemies she claims to have are getting their ideas from re-runs of the HBO series OZ now instead of using one of many methods that would leave no trace or the clever bio-weapon she was involved in developing to off her , Judy you can make up better BS than that , can't you???

  • @blindjfk I NEVER CLAIMED ANY SUCH THING. A person at the table where our family was eating wrote an article,even misspelling my name. I posted that it was almost certainly an accident.Only went to hospital because I had a piece of glass stuck in my throat.You misrepresented me,saying I claimed an attack on my life. Shame on you.. I suppose you will erase my comment?

  • @judythvbaker I don not erase comments , if I am incorrect about the reports then I am mistaken by posting what some people you have talked to said . By all means say what you will . I don't edit comments even from the likes of you. I don't stop the the anti-conspiracy people or you. Either you are a backer of the Baker story or you are Mrs. Baker , Either way I am greatful you have chosen to comment in the open instead of defending her story and threatening me privately like some , thank you

  • Dozens of views and the only one who posts a comment is Popeye?? Looking back BTW ... Douglass was the only number in my cell list . And I have looked into some of this story for myself. Only the stuff connected to Oswald and My opinion is unchanged. I advise anyone who hears anything on a controversial story to fact check for themselves. If anyone finds anything besides the coffee co info. on Baker please let me know. Look and see what other alumni of that place went on to do.

  • Read mary , Ferry... Douglass was the name I disputed. As with your list of backers the baker / oswald story is a blend of fact and fiction. My study of her statements over the years reveals the construct. Her medical knowledge and creative writing skills I accept. Vaguely acquainted with Oswald? Maybe. I spoke to others who did a hell of a lot more research on the New Orleans aspect than myself and e-mailed some others. You know of Black Op Radio , listen to this weeks episode that's my email

  • That's the thing I have researched her story. Forget me , You are not willing to see the. So far as you know there are no researchers who don't buy her story? Then as I feared you are unaware of the depth of disinformation around the Kennedy case. I have done quite a bit of research on the subject. , There is plenty of garbage on the conspiracy side (Ultimate Sacrafice , farewell america , the torbit document , etc.) and the lone nut side is not where I am,. Listen to your interview.

  • Dude, as I have said before, if you do 5 minutes of research on Judyth you will see she is not lying. The people who try to make her look bad are people gerald posner, yeah he is really credible. I suggest you do some research on her, read some books and talk to other researchers who have interviewed her and checked her out before talking about her. Ask Jim Fetzer, Ed Haslam, Jim Marrs, and James Douglass if they think she is full of shit since they all investigated her and say she is not lying.

  • @TheAnswerto1984is I had a quick chat with James Douglass and he stated to me that he has not researcher the Baker story and had no opinion on it. she thanked him in her book and he (being the polite , gentle person he is) thanked her for kind words as he is apt to do. Research goes beyond the search engine and Gerald Posner???? Say I am in league with satan next time it's less insulting.

  • @blindjfk As I said, ask Jim Marrs or Ed Haslam. Ed has done a ton of research into what she was involved in. Also as Jim Fetzer. Asking one out of four is not good detective work. I suggest you read ED's book Dr. Mary's Monkey.

  • @blindjfk Douglass kindly sent me his autographed book.He may not be on the list above,but many unnamed should be.Dutch fraud investigator Peter DeVries filmed me after investigation,as did Nigel Turner,Wim Dankbaar & others.60 Minutes(sent emails of apologies)investigated 14 months & tried to film 3 times,Harrison Livingstone published my book in haste while 5 editors vetted ME & LEE 2 years before publishing.These people spent significant time with me to get all the facts straight.And you?

  • @judythvbaker Turner has put out plenty of misinformed theories, Wim ? , Files?? are you serious, Livingstone ?? the guy who makes death threats against researchers who prove his facts wrong? Douglass is a kind and polite guy who told me he "has not researched" and "does not care to research your claims" . The fraud investigator ? No clue . 3 logical issues Lee mentioned Sol Estes? CIA or ONI ? super spy Oswald blows his cover that easy to a woman against counter-inel training I KNOW he had

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more