This is why Hitler took it so seriously when France surrendered. I can fully understand, and I hope that you can all agree that this was the worse thing they could have done, and this is what led to ww2.
This video has a few weakness; it needs citations for its key claims that Britain set a trap for Germany and wanted to stop the American System, and it fails to account for Fritz Fischer's work (which contradicts its key claims), but I'm going to favourite it because it does raise some important historical points eg the insane severity of Versailles which, for some reason, it doesn't mention by name.
@rfalfonse Versailles was severe indeed. But why such a intent of gigantic expansion by war from germany ? German was alwaysa center of tension; Nowadays with huge amounts of money (muchof it virtual) and , a market needing expansion ,but with scarcity of raw material for products and employment.
The players have never seen the string pullers so think they are making decisions. Early on the string pullers realized AH could not be manipulated as most others allowed to rise are eager to be so he had to be taken down as well as the system that worked so well without bankers.
Crurchill said more than once Germany MUST be destroyed because it was a threat to the ECONOMIC SUPERIORITY
They both got help, and if we assume they continued being "manipulated" while in office it might show some of their unusual decisions in a fresh light. I wouldn´t dismiss the possibility that they were `advised´ by people hostile to German imperial interests. If Wilhelm had nourished German-Russian ties, history might have taken a different course. If Hitler had allowed his Generals to take the British soldiers trapped on the main, captive, it might have resulted in an armistice with Britain.
Personally I wouldn't think so, more likely they were both Manipulated into the position, we know that a large part of the pre 1933 Nazi finance came from Jewish interests, agents of the British Empire & Rothchild
Shell? 7.32 ? the Royal Dutch Shell?
DutchPetriot 11 months ago
@DutchPetriot check wikipedia under "History"
panzermacher 11 months ago
some one critisizes the english jews, blame the english
someone critisizes the german jews, blame the germans
someone critisizes the jews , blame the zionist
someone critisizes the jewish bankers?..... oh no we cant talk about....
oh... and why did you not mention the jewish bankers in this again?
real1abcda 1 year ago
This is why Hitler took it so seriously when France surrendered. I can fully understand, and I hope that you can all agree that this was the worse thing they could have done, and this is what led to ww2.
r0bd4rk 1 year ago
This video has a few weakness; it needs citations for its key claims that Britain set a trap for Germany and wanted to stop the American System, and it fails to account for Fritz Fischer's work (which contradicts its key claims), but I'm going to favourite it because it does raise some important historical points eg the insane severity of Versailles which, for some reason, it doesn't mention by name.
rfalfonse 1 year ago
@rfalfonse Versailles was severe indeed. But why such a intent of gigantic expansion by war from germany ? German was alwaysa center of tension; Nowadays with huge amounts of money (muchof it virtual) and , a market needing expansion ,but with scarcity of raw material for products and employment.
miguelmouta 1 year ago
@rfalfonse
"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."
W.S. Churchill.
flyhead2 1 year ago
The players have never seen the string pullers so think they are making decisions. Early on the string pullers realized AH could not be manipulated as most others allowed to rise are eager to be so he had to be taken down as well as the system that worked so well without bankers.
Crurchill said more than once Germany MUST be destroyed because it was a threat to the ECONOMIC SUPERIORITY
of great Britain.
sophia88two 2 years ago
If British empire don't use their tyranny ob Germany, they don't have to egnite another warfare..
melbourneopera 2 years ago
They both got help, and if we assume they continued being "manipulated" while in office it might show some of their unusual decisions in a fresh light. I wouldn´t dismiss the possibility that they were `advised´ by people hostile to German imperial interests. If Wilhelm had nourished German-Russian ties, history might have taken a different course. If Hitler had allowed his Generals to take the British soldiers trapped on the main, captive, it might have resulted in an armistice with Britain.
kolkrabe19 3 years ago
Personally I wouldn't think so, more likely they were both Manipulated into the position, we know that a large part of the pre 1933 Nazi finance came from Jewish interests, agents of the British Empire & Rothchild
panzermacher 3 years ago
To be fair, the jews like to have thier fingers in as many pies as possible in thier unending quest for profits - I think you are correct though..
andy7666 3 years ago
Very interesting clips. So Wilhelm II and Adolf Hitler were willing instruments in the destruction of Germany ?
kolkrabe19 3 years ago