Whether fluoride is good or bad for you, shouldn't you have the choice to have it in your water or not? That's the main point everyone is missing. Why are we being forced to consume anything? Why are they putting chemicals in our tap water against our will? So people that argue for fluoride need to understand that even if it was good for you, I DO NOT want it in my water supply. That's my choice as a free human being... Unfortunately, we're not really free, are we?
Dear Huttate1, you state that you have read many books. I wonder if you have read 'The Case Against Fluoride' by Dr. Paul Connett, Dr. James Beck & Dr. Spedding Micklem. It's published by Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603582872 - please have a read when you get the chance.
Even if the Nazi did this, it does not prove the reason they did this. And even if you could prove the reason they did this, it does not prove them to correct in their reasoning or logic.
@Kevashida I am not certain that I follow your logic. The point of this video was to show that there is no evidence that the Nazis or Soviets used Fluoride as a weapon of any kind. The video was prompted by the fact that the usual suspect conspiracy theorists throw this up when they dribble on about water fluoridation.
@Huttate1 Or rather does it mater what the nazi did or did not do. The nazi did a great many things, for a great many reasons. They were not always right in their logic, and got things wrong, it is like saying. I have this book that says Seven Up will bring people back from the dead, and the nazi used it for this reason on many of times. The fact the nazi used Seven up, does not change what Seven up is. It doesn't mater why they used it. Seven up is Seven Up, anything it can do can be tested.
@Kevashida I have no interest in a debate on the Nazis. I can only clarify that the point of the video was to debunk the link made between fluoride and the Nazis / Soviets. A link often used to demonise fluoride; as in 'the Nazis used it in the concentration camps therefore it must be evil'.That flawed logic, built on an incorrect premise is a perfect example of how conspiracy theories are developed. Type 'Nazi Fluoride' into the Youtube search bar and see how widespread the myth is.
@Huttate1 Let me put this way, saying if people X did action Y, for Z reason. Well, people X are evil, reason Z was evil, so action Y is evil. The People X do not mater. If action Y leads to reason Z then action Y is evil, but if there is no proof that action Y leads to the resualts of reason Z, then there is no point. Saying Fluoride is evil because the Nazi used it, is like saying having children is evil because the Nazi did it.
@Kevashida To a rational mind it makes no difference whatsoever. But those that hang on the word of every conspiracy theory lap up the 'bad by association'.
"Fluoride is bad - the Nazis used it in the concentration camps to keep the prisoners docile"
A conspiranaut hears that and repeats it without ever bothering to check the facts.
Conspiracies, like religions, can only be dismantled one brick at a time.
@Huttate1 [Type 'Nazi Fluoride' into the Youtube search bar and see how widespread the myth is.] - Then I suggest you type something else into a Google search: Fluoride Action Network ( fluoridealert . org ). There is no mention of "Nazi's" by this network. They do, on the other hand, have some very good collated information to learn more about the issue. For example, check out their 'Fluoride Health Effects Database'.
@kalimayaopus I have read widely on the subject but I am only interested in peer-reviewed publications. Interest groups can easily make statistics dance for them. This video concerns the oft repeated statement that Nazis used fluoride as a weapon. I do not take a stance on th efficacy of fluoridation.
@Huttate1 I would be interested in you making a video response to this book, after you have read it of course - ISBN: 9781603582872 - because it rejects conspiracy theory, and in particular, it rejects the claimed "Nazi connection". But it is critical, on a scientific and ethical level, of current fluoridation policy. It also highlights the research gaps. I think you would find it a good read. If you don't, no harm done to you. Peace.
@SapphireEyesDocos It is a book - written to make money. It is not a peer-reviewed scientific document. This video concerns the oft repeated statement that Nazis used fluoride as a weapon. I do not take a stance on th efficacy of fluoridation. My current view is that more research is done but that the debate has become polarised around ill-informed lobby groups.
@infrasonicnada I am impressed that you took the time to comment. Much less impressed at the asinine comment itself. Perhaps you could construct something that would provide those that read your comment with some clue as to thye basis for your oh so colourful opine.
@Huttate1 Bother to read the book. It has tonnes of peer-reviewed documents within it. And actually, the book was not written to make money as the motive - more to raise important questions and debunk myths and false science. And your comment about ill-informed lobby groups is very apt - the pro fluoridation lobby being the main body of people who refuse to do the safety tests. The fluoride chemical has a direct affect on the brain, but the book does NOT talk at all about the Nazis.
@infrasonicnada Google "Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards (2006) pdf" This appears a very damning report at first glance.
I shall read it in full and might produce a vid if I think I can do it justice and add something to the debate.
Excellently done. I wish more people would go to primary references... the Internet is full of circular references (citing an article that cites another article that never cites their claims).
@234corn Am trying to demolish the myths as I find them. And would love to find one that I could not demolish. If you have any ideas they would be very welcome.
Nice video. I always wish to know the truth. Anyone who comes to understand more evidence for or against the claims that fluoridation is linked to Nazism or communism, please let me know. Thanks.
image all of the infowars team spending most of the day just taking quotes out of context, hard work cooking up stools of ignorance for alex jones blast across the air waves and interwebs.
alex jones thinks neo-cons = marxists = Trotsky-ists = communists = nazis = liberals or maybe demonic devil worshippers, basically i do not trust a word from their lips
This has been flagged as spam show
Whether fluoride is good or bad for you, shouldn't you have the choice to have it in your water or not? That's the main point everyone is missing. Why are we being forced to consume anything? Why are they putting chemicals in our tap water against our will? So people that argue for fluoride need to understand that even if it was good for you, I DO NOT want it in my water supply. That's my choice as a free human being... Unfortunately, we're not really free, are we?
EndlessWaltzTV 2 weeks ago
@Huttate1 Very well put. I May have to quote you some day.
MrAKjosh 1 month ago
Dear Huttate1, you state that you have read many books. I wonder if you have read 'The Case Against Fluoride' by Dr. Paul Connett, Dr. James Beck & Dr. Spedding Micklem. It's published by Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603582872 - please have a read when you get the chance.
SapphireEyesDocos 1 month ago
Well done. subbed.
CATMAHAT 1 month ago
Even if the Nazi did this, it does not prove the reason they did this. And even if you could prove the reason they did this, it does not prove them to correct in their reasoning or logic.
Kevashida 1 month ago
@Kevashida I am not certain that I follow your logic. The point of this video was to show that there is no evidence that the Nazis or Soviets used Fluoride as a weapon of any kind. The video was prompted by the fact that the usual suspect conspiracy theorists throw this up when they dribble on about water fluoridation.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 Or rather does it mater what the nazi did or did not do. The nazi did a great many things, for a great many reasons. They were not always right in their logic, and got things wrong, it is like saying. I have this book that says Seven Up will bring people back from the dead, and the nazi used it for this reason on many of times. The fact the nazi used Seven up, does not change what Seven up is. It doesn't mater why they used it. Seven up is Seven Up, anything it can do can be tested.
Kevashida 1 month ago
@Kevashida I have no interest in a debate on the Nazis. I can only clarify that the point of the video was to debunk the link made between fluoride and the Nazis / Soviets. A link often used to demonise fluoride; as in 'the Nazis used it in the concentration camps therefore it must be evil'.That flawed logic, built on an incorrect premise is a perfect example of how conspiracy theories are developed. Type 'Nazi Fluoride' into the Youtube search bar and see how widespread the myth is.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 Let me put this way, saying if people X did action Y, for Z reason. Well, people X are evil, reason Z was evil, so action Y is evil. The People X do not mater. If action Y leads to reason Z then action Y is evil, but if there is no proof that action Y leads to the resualts of reason Z, then there is no point. Saying Fluoride is evil because the Nazi used it, is like saying having children is evil because the Nazi did it.
Kevashida 1 month ago
@Kevashida I have no idea why you continue arguing against an assertion which I never made.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 My point is why the fuck does it mater if the nazi did it or not?
Kevashida 1 month ago
@Kevashida To a rational mind it makes no difference whatsoever. But those that hang on the word of every conspiracy theory lap up the 'bad by association'.
"Fluoride is bad - the Nazis used it in the concentration camps to keep the prisoners docile"
A conspiranaut hears that and repeats it without ever bothering to check the facts.
Conspiracies, like religions, can only be dismantled one brick at a time.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 [Type 'Nazi Fluoride' into the Youtube search bar and see how widespread the myth is.] - Then I suggest you type something else into a Google search: Fluoride Action Network ( fluoridealert . org ). There is no mention of "Nazi's" by this network. They do, on the other hand, have some very good collated information to learn more about the issue. For example, check out their 'Fluoride Health Effects Database'.
kalimayaopus 1 month ago
@kalimayaopus I have read widely on the subject but I am only interested in peer-reviewed publications. Interest groups can easily make statistics dance for them. This video concerns the oft repeated statement that Nazis used fluoride as a weapon. I do not take a stance on th efficacy of fluoridation.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 I would be interested in you making a video response to this book, after you have read it of course - ISBN: 9781603582872 - because it rejects conspiracy theory, and in particular, it rejects the claimed "Nazi connection". But it is critical, on a scientific and ethical level, of current fluoridation policy. It also highlights the research gaps. I think you would find it a good read. If you don't, no harm done to you. Peace.
SapphireEyesDocos 1 month ago
@SapphireEyesDocos It is a book - written to make money. It is not a peer-reviewed scientific document. This video concerns the oft repeated statement that Nazis used fluoride as a weapon. I do not take a stance on th efficacy of fluoridation. My current view is that more research is done but that the debate has become polarised around ill-informed lobby groups.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 Chicken shit pussy.
infrasonicnada 1 month ago
@infrasonicnada I am impressed that you took the time to comment. Much less impressed at the asinine comment itself. Perhaps you could construct something that would provide those that read your comment with some clue as to thye basis for your oh so colourful opine.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 Bother to read the book. It has tonnes of peer-reviewed documents within it. And actually, the book was not written to make money as the motive - more to raise important questions and debunk myths and false science. And your comment about ill-informed lobby groups is very apt - the pro fluoridation lobby being the main body of people who refuse to do the safety tests. The fluoride chemical has a direct affect on the brain, but the book does NOT talk at all about the Nazis.
infrasonicnada 1 month ago
@infrasonicnada Which book?
Huttate1 1 month ago
@Huttate1 ISBN: 9781603582872
infrasonicnada 1 month ago
@infrasonicnada I am doing so. But is a bit off topic here as this video was primarily concerning the nazi myth and not the efficacy of fluoridation.
Huttate1 1 month ago
@infrasonicnada Google "Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards (2006) pdf" This appears a very damning report at first glance.
I shall read it in full and might produce a vid if I think I can do it justice and add something to the debate.
Huttate1 1 month ago
Excellently done. I wish more people would go to primary references... the Internet is full of circular references (citing an article that cites another article that never cites their claims).
C0nc0rdance 1 month ago 5
Very good you should do more
234corn 3 months ago
@234corn Am trying to demolish the myths as I find them. And would love to find one that I could not demolish. If you have any ideas they would be very welcome.
Huttate1 3 months ago 3
Nice video. I always wish to know the truth. Anyone who comes to understand more evidence for or against the claims that fluoridation is linked to Nazism or communism, please let me know. Thanks.
theslothmonkey 3 months ago
image all of the infowars team spending most of the day just taking quotes out of context, hard work cooking up stools of ignorance for alex jones blast across the air waves and interwebs.
great video, pure class
roblesterfilms 5 months ago
alex jones thinks neo-cons = marxists = Trotsky-ists = communists = nazis = liberals or maybe demonic devil worshippers, basically i do not trust a word from their lips
roblesterfilms 5 months ago
you do your research, but one line of fact is more than most conspiracy nuts
roblesterfilms 5 months ago
great video
roblesterfilms 5 months ago