Yea...Ben stein is soo dumb, I mean, who WOULDN'T wanna believe all life came from a lightning bolt hitting a crystal...or from aliens. The man said what he said, stop trying to act like he didn't.
@fatface5454 Neither one of them believe that a lightning bolt hit a crystal. Richard Dawkins never said he believed that intelligent aliens seeded life on Earth, but merely offered it as a possibility. I can say it's entirely possible that the Christian God exists, but it is very unlikely and that is why I don't believe it. If you'd just listen Richard Dawkins says no one knows the origin of life yet. There is no theory on the origin of life, but speculation, most prominently abiogenesis.
Oh Ben Stein you fucking idiot. Did you even listen to Dawkins?
Life starting on another planet and rooting itself onto Earth is NOT intelligent design because it has nothing to do with any sort of deity or divinity. Dawkins said TWICE that the on the other planet may have risen up from Darwinian, non-creationist means.
Dawkins is actually putting to the rest the idea of intelligent design by suggesting the designer of man is either created by someone else or appeared out of nothingness. For the OP, this is not an argument FOR God or anything like that, it is a logic argument refuting such a belief. He is suggesting to believe in God/Allah/FSM, you need to either believe something else created God, or that it exists outside the Universe, which raises more questions than it answers.
He said it's possible but not likely. These videos take things out of context, cut and paste to make it Richard sounds like what they want him to sound like.
Ben Stein and pack of morons should hang their head low in shame on this one. They took this clip sooooo out of context, there is no way they didn't know what they were doing. Shame on them.
@Randimable They came about by Abiogenesis and natural selection. That's exactly what Dawkins says but this clip has cut out that part to make Dawkins look foolish. It's called a Quote mine they use parts and pieces out of context to make someone look like they said something they didn't
@Mekelsior Abiogenesis has been proven in the lab. How do you think chemicals came together to make more complex structures? Magic? HAHA! Yes they have had it figured it out for quit a long time now. I think it's hilarious how Science deniers are so far behind. Just the other day some turd told me we can't view atoms HAHA. So far behind...
He was talking about a theory called panspermia Notice how he says a intelligent race that evolved By EVOLUTION could have designed us. This video is only for the credulous and moronic mouth breathers.
Ben Stein's IQ is -50. Hes so fucking dumb and closed minded that he totally misunderstood Dawkins. Also SaladinKurdishEagle your IQ is probably even lower. I dont give a FUCK about the shitty little scribbles in your holy book, they are infantile wet dreams. Stop preaching to others, nobody with any brain power believes that crap
i believe religion was created by aliens, just to seperate us. just think about it, if we cant accept each other how will we accept alien life, they dont want to show themself to a primitive race thats not exepting and may shoot at them. this video is another example of not being exepting
Richard Dawkins has already shown the interviewee was dishonest in his approach and this has already been explained. I can't believe people accept this as proof of anything.
@Xirbtt you could consider his first question loaded, but from his perspective it is a logical question to ask. dawkins said he dident like it so stein changed the question....this leads you to believe he is dishonest?
HE IS AGAINST INTELLIGENT DESIGN! HE Clearly says that even if someone created thing on earth this being is no god. Just a higher evolved being. It's like a european which brings a polaroid camera to a tribe in africa. This polaroid camera have to look like magic to the tribe.
If someone INSISTS on calling the Theory of evolution "Darwinism", then it must absolutely be called Darwin-Mendilism - after-all, the Theory of evolution is a synthesis of Darwins evolutionary mechanisms and Mendels genetic/hereditary mechanisms.
I'm glad that somebody finally attributes Mendel as well, but that's just the part of it you see in highschool. There are still more things to the theory. Like these days scientists are researching why evolution appears to happen in short bursts rather than as a "smooth" process. I honastly don't know all there is to know about evolution, but I recall there being more things to it than darwin and mendel at a universitary level...
Oh yes. If you really want to get technical, you can call yourself a Darwin/Mendel/Hardy-Weinberg/ Haldane/Wright-ist!
There's a lot to know about evolution, what you're talking about is Goulds' Punctuated equilibrium. Organisms stay stable for long periods of time, then evolve rapidly in response to sudden changes in their environment.
It's sad that so many are fundamentalistically religious to a degree where they can't appreciate all the things we can learn about life..
It's not my area of expertise by far, but my gf studies bio-engineering, so I pick up small stuff along the way xD.
And I agree. It's also sad how they don't realize how small their knowlage about all the things they disagree with is :s. I know because they also disagree with astrophysics, which I'm studying
Hahahahahahahaha ...... The biggest opposition to a creator now seems to think that there could be an intelligent design.... I dont beleive im seeing this.... Its like he's half way there... now he just needs to realise its GOD not an alien or mr antichrist. An amazing confession. He's making progress, rather slow but he might just get there in the end....
These are only hypotheses in order to explain or discredit a higher power.
The only thing that must know true existence must dwell outside of our level of existence. (So to speak)
I'm speaking of the celestial. God.
Creationism better formulates all theories of "the big bang," yet does not discredit evolution as adaptation. The two could go hand in hand, yet we could never prove it.
Aliens are the fallen angels. Notice the energizer bunny commercial that has aliens and powers up their spaceship, the nintendo wii characters are "beamed up" when you select them and the characters point up afterwords, COX commercials have the spacemen, etc. They are gearing you up for a grand alien deception. The new Age started by Helena P. Blavatsky, a self proclaimed Luciferian taught that the gods are ascended masters, including Jesus but that is a lie. There is only One and that is Jesus.
While the existence (or lack thereof) of God is non-falsiable and there is no proof one way or the other, at least it is not overcomplicated.
On the other hand, alien life that had reached Earth without divine intervention would still require spontaneous generation somewhere along the road, therefore making it an unnecessary hypothesis, no more probable than for the origin of life to be on this planet.
I never said alien life had to reach Earth. If you think about the billions of planets there are, the probability of there being intelligent life is reasonable. The very fact that there is life on Earth, knowing there is a possibility that there could be life elsewhere is greater than smuggling in a creator.
"alien life that had reached Earth without divine intervention would still require spontaneous generation"
"Spontaneous generation" is a 110 year old debunked, obsolete idea, and is not representative of what scientists believe about the Origin of life on Earth. The modern theories concern Abiogenesis.
For research on abiogenesis, Jack Szostak has a brilliant web page where all his research on Abiogenesis is released.
Why would it require spontaneous generation? It doesn't talk about origin of life, it talks about the emergance of life on earth... And what the hell is spontaneous generation? A God-hypothesis?
This is stupid. He doesn't say he believes this only that it isn't out of the realm of possibility, just very unlikely. Ben stein is a hawkish weiner of a man.
Richard Dawkins PROVES beyond a doubt that evolution is 100% accurate. Watch this new late breaking discovery he has made. History has been made. Record this new day. Eat it creationists!
Believing is space aliens is still less stupid than believing in "jinns" and that heaven is where meteorite come from lol
SourcesAreEverything 1 week ago
Yea...Ben stein is soo dumb, I mean, who WOULDN'T wanna believe all life came from a lightning bolt hitting a crystal...or from aliens. The man said what he said, stop trying to act like he didn't.
fatface5454 1 month ago
@fatface5454 Neither one of them believe that a lightning bolt hit a crystal. Richard Dawkins never said he believed that intelligent aliens seeded life on Earth, but merely offered it as a possibility. I can say it's entirely possible that the Christian God exists, but it is very unlikely and that is why I don't believe it. If you'd just listen Richard Dawkins says no one knows the origin of life yet. There is no theory on the origin of life, but speculation, most prominently abiogenesis.
strkszone 2 weeks ago
Oh Ben Stein you fucking idiot. Did you even listen to Dawkins?
Life starting on another planet and rooting itself onto Earth is NOT intelligent design because it has nothing to do with any sort of deity or divinity. Dawkins said TWICE that the on the other planet may have risen up from Darwinian, non-creationist means.
Xmaggot93X 1 month ago
Funny how all of the videos posted supporting Christianity have no option for like/dislike.
Take your dislikes like a man. You're wrong. Just accept reality, stupid fucking Christian.
Xmaggot93X 1 month ago
@Xmaggot93X The guy who posted this is a muslim, and your a retard
fatface5454 2 weeks ago
ben stein just lost all his credibility.
syaoranpies 2 months ago
Aliens jacked off in the ocean and created life on Earth.
Typhoonbladefist 5 months ago
Dawkins can't win.
If he says it's extremely unlikely that God or intelligent design exists, people call him arrogant.
If he entertains the highly unlikely scenario that something resembling intelligent design may once have existed, he’s made out to be a hypocrite.
He’s neither of those things. He's a rational, humble, fair-minded scientist. Get over it.
neonatalpenguin 6 months ago 5
Evolution: 0 points
God: 0 points
Ancient Astronauts: 10 points!
prototypo 9 months ago
Evolution: 100 points
God: 0 points
Ancient Astronauts: 10 points
MrButerfinger 3 months ago
Dawkins is actually putting to the rest the idea of intelligent design by suggesting the designer of man is either created by someone else or appeared out of nothingness. For the OP, this is not an argument FOR God or anything like that, it is a logic argument refuting such a belief. He is suggesting to believe in God/Allah/FSM, you need to either believe something else created God, or that it exists outside the Universe, which raises more questions than it answers.
tarveren 10 months ago
"Explicable process" - Dawdin's faith revealed - faith in "explicable process"
abdallahmarsh 10 months ago
Ben Stein was Nixon's speech writer. So he knows all about lying. He's a professional.
wuezili 10 months ago
I dont have to even watch the video.
if the ratings of a video are disabled you know its a creationist video.
Its a known funny fact :)
tilemacro 11 months ago
FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER!!!! ALL HAIL YOUR CREATOR! PRAY TO FSP!
SuperAthiest1 11 months ago
He said it's possible but not likely. These videos take things out of context, cut and paste to make it Richard sounds like what they want him to sound like.
PeaceOfTruth 1 year ago
Sounds like the story of the Annunaki to me... Interesting that Dawkins states that.
ufosenbomen 1 year ago
Ben Stein and pack of morons should hang their head low in shame on this one. They took this clip sooooo out of context, there is no way they didn't know what they were doing. Shame on them.
shugnixx 1 year ago
The title of this video needs to be changed.
meshyis 1 year ago
Who CREATED GOD?!
god can't have always existed
everything begins to exist like I did from unison of egg and sperm.
irrational belief
WindGod12 1 year ago
From what program is this??
blssdfall27 1 year ago
@blssdfall27 I guess Expelled: no intelligence allowed.
ufosenbomen 1 year ago
@Randimable They came about by Abiogenesis and natural selection. That's exactly what Dawkins says but this clip has cut out that part to make Dawkins look foolish. It's called a Quote mine they use parts and pieces out of context to make someone look like they said something they didn't
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist Abiogenesis? This has not been proven, not even in the lab so why believe in it?
Mekelsior 1 year ago
@Mekelsior Abiogenesis has been proven in the lab. How do you think chemicals came together to make more complex structures? Magic? HAHA! Yes they have had it figured it out for quit a long time now. I think it's hilarious how Science deniers are so far behind. Just the other day some turd told me we can't view atoms HAHA. So far behind...
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
Awesome! :D
falcon851985138953 1 year ago
He was talking about a theory called panspermia Notice how he says a intelligent race that evolved By EVOLUTION could have designed us. This video is only for the credulous and moronic mouth breathers.
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
Ben Stein's IQ is -50. Hes so fucking dumb and closed minded that he totally misunderstood Dawkins. Also SaladinKurdishEagle your IQ is probably even lower. I dont give a FUCK about the shitty little scribbles in your holy book, they are infantile wet dreams. Stop preaching to others, nobody with any brain power believes that crap
LowleyUK 1 year ago
i believe religion was created by aliens, just to seperate us. just think about it, if we cant accept each other how will we accept alien life, they dont want to show themself to a primitive race thats not exepting and may shoot at them. this video is another example of not being exepting
patriotfreedomfigher 1 year ago
And how did these aliens come about? Is naturalistic and coincidental abiogenesis any more likely on other worlds in the universe?
Mike62075 1 year ago
What is a god?
Someone who plant a seed of life to a planet that evolve into our present state?
No....
ArtificialMadness 2 years ago
Sam old New Age Deception,nothing new here.
GodLovesUs100 2 years ago
Richard Dawkins has already shown the interviewee was dishonest in his approach and this has already been explained. I can't believe people accept this as proof of anything.
Xirbtt 2 years ago 17
@Xirbtt you could consider his first question loaded, but from his perspective it is a logical question to ask. dawkins said he dident like it so stein changed the question....this leads you to believe he is dishonest?
Salem2322 1 month ago
HE IS AGAINST INTELLIGENT DESIGN! HE Clearly says that even if someone created thing on earth this being is no god. Just a higher evolved being. It's like a european which brings a polaroid camera to a tribe in africa. This polaroid camera have to look like magic to the tribe.
jackprince1983 2 years ago
If someone INSISTS on calling the Theory of evolution "Darwinism", then it must absolutely be called Darwin-Mendilism - after-all, the Theory of evolution is a synthesis of Darwins evolutionary mechanisms and Mendels genetic/hereditary mechanisms.
anglicantian 2 years ago
I'm glad that somebody finally attributes Mendel as well, but that's just the part of it you see in highschool. There are still more things to the theory. Like these days scientists are researching why evolution appears to happen in short bursts rather than as a "smooth" process. I honastly don't know all there is to know about evolution, but I recall there being more things to it than darwin and mendel at a universitary level...
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
@TakesTwoToTango
Oh yes. If you really want to get technical, you can call yourself a Darwin/Mendel/Hardy-Weinberg/ Haldane/Wright-ist!
There's a lot to know about evolution, what you're talking about is Goulds' Punctuated equilibrium. Organisms stay stable for long periods of time, then evolve rapidly in response to sudden changes in their environment.
It's sad that so many are fundamentalistically religious to a degree where they can't appreciate all the things we can learn about life..
anglicantian 1 year ago
Thanks for the information ^^
It's not my area of expertise by far, but my gf studies bio-engineering, so I pick up small stuff along the way xD.
And I agree. It's also sad how they don't realize how small their knowlage about all the things they disagree with is :s. I know because they also disagree with astrophysics, which I'm studying
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
Hahahahahahahaha ...... The biggest opposition to a creator now seems to think that there could be an intelligent design.... I dont beleive im seeing this.... Its like he's half way there... now he just needs to realise its GOD not an alien or mr antichrist. An amazing confession. He's making progress, rather slow but he might just get there in the end....
MissionWorldPeace 2 years ago
There is no G-D than HER, the one-and-only True G-Ddesse, the Holy Sun.
She is in all obviousness OBVIOUS Everybody can see her and feel her, but obviously some refuse to have themselves BLESSED by her.
SHE is the maternal spender of the highestly organized Energy Beam, for the propulsion of the
Evolution
of all life beings on Earth, in past, presence and future.
AMIN!
kleenex3000 2 years ago
Wrong prayer.
Ramen!
justforflag2 2 years ago 3
Der Kampf der Titanen!
kleenex3000 2 years ago
Men know nothing.
These are only hypotheses in order to explain or discredit a higher power.
The only thing that must know true existence must dwell outside of our level of existence. (So to speak)
I'm speaking of the celestial. God.
Creationism better formulates all theories of "the big bang," yet does not discredit evolution as adaptation. The two could go hand in hand, yet we could never prove it.
HMachProductions 2 years ago
@HMachProductions
Some men know MUCH
Bible: Compiled by old Men from the Middle East. Presumably drug addicted (wll I admit I DON't know, the LATTER)
kleenex3000 2 years ago
How I pity the dumbass that posted this... Not only for watching Expelled, but for being dumb enough to actually believe what's said in it.
Hoglund 2 years ago
This is a stark contrast between very stupid and incredibly smart people having a conversation .
flyingscience 2 years ago 2
Aliens are more probable to believe in than god.
harold12345lol 2 years ago
Aliens are the fallen angels. Notice the energizer bunny commercial that has aliens and powers up their spaceship, the nintendo wii characters are "beamed up" when you select them and the characters point up afterwords, COX commercials have the spacemen, etc. They are gearing you up for a grand alien deception. The new Age started by Helena P. Blavatsky, a self proclaimed Luciferian taught that the gods are ascended masters, including Jesus but that is a lie. There is only One and that is Jesus.
selious04 2 years ago
I feel inclined to disagree.
While the existence (or lack thereof) of God is non-falsiable and there is no proof one way or the other, at least it is not overcomplicated.
On the other hand, alien life that had reached Earth without divine intervention would still require spontaneous generation somewhere along the road, therefore making it an unnecessary hypothesis, no more probable than for the origin of life to be on this planet.
Zatessar 2 years ago
I never said alien life had to reach Earth. If you think about the billions of planets there are, the probability of there being intelligent life is reasonable. The very fact that there is life on Earth, knowing there is a possibility that there could be life elsewhere is greater than smuggling in a creator.
harold12345lol 2 years ago 2
"alien life that had reached Earth without divine intervention would still require spontaneous generation"
"Spontaneous generation" is a 110 year old debunked, obsolete idea, and is not representative of what scientists believe about the Origin of life on Earth. The modern theories concern Abiogenesis.
For research on abiogenesis, Jack Szostak has a brilliant web page where all his research on Abiogenesis is released.
anglicantian 2 years ago
Why would it require spontaneous generation? It doesn't talk about origin of life, it talks about the emergance of life on earth... And what the hell is spontaneous generation? A God-hypothesis?
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
Enable ratings
Abaharaki 2 years ago
When one person is dellusional it is called insanity, when many people share a dellusion it is called Religion.
laurencez26 2 years ago 3
Woah...!!!
donovanrules123123 2 years ago
This is stupid. He doesn't say he believes this only that it isn't out of the realm of possibility, just very unlikely. Ben stein is a hawkish weiner of a man.
theblankgeneration1 2 years ago 19
He also said that NO ONE knows how it all started. Imagine that. All by faith.
AsTheDaysOfNoahWere 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins PROVES beyond a doubt that evolution is 100% accurate. Watch this new late breaking discovery he has made. History has been made. Record this new day. Eat it creationists!
watch?v=zaKryi3605g
AsTheDaysOfNoahWere 2 years ago
he said it was a possibility, not that he believes it.
even if something were designed, it does not mean that god designed it. it could have been designed by another source, that was his point.
twiistaaa 2 years ago