Jews, Christians, and Muslims better hope that each of their religions is correct......because in the name of "RELIGION", Millions have been slain.....and even today.....we are being driven into the destruction of our planet in the name of "RELIGION"......
Mr. Zlauvinen became visibly uncomfortable when the interview was directed to Israel. It's like he's slowly realizing this interview isn't being done by a sell-out news hack,but a reporter truly asking hard questions. He almost seems stunned at one point! LOL!
Priceless! I love you guys, TheRealNews! Keep it coming, you guys are awesome! And you better not get famous and go sell out, either! I mean it!! lolol
Truthseeker07, Don`t they all. From Belgium to Paris, DC to Denmark; Zionists have a tight gripon the Western countries and by extension the world. They`re under the yoke of zionism.Servants must serve their masters or else
This IAEA guy was given the go ahead to work for the Agency by israel (Formerly Palestine). No one works for the IAEA with out the approval of israel and the United states. israel dictates to America and then America, at the behest of israel, dictates to the world
Paul, this was a well done interview. You posed very legitimate, Mature and intellectual questions to this IAEA guy; but your questions were met with asinine answers. He self-inflictingly wounded himself with his nonsensical arguments. Paul, well done and thanks
israel (Formerly Palestine) will never disarm and it dictates to the west, but iran or any Middle-eastern country won`t be allowed to possess any N-weapons as that creates balance of power in the region and makes israel as an equal in terms of power and not a militarily powerful country as it is today
your right, the final hour will not come until the muslims fight the jews at that time the stones will speak "muslim there is a jew hiding behind me come and kill him"!
I like the "Even the closest allies don't share information with us". Then why does Iran have to share its secret information outside its obligations. The argument doesn't stand up either about buying fuel because then it puts them in the position of relying on other parties who can use it against them politically as has been done before. We need to lead by example and be fair and let other countries be free and evolve naturally like we did and still do.
Bush should have sent troops to iraq to check for nuclear weapons but instead he just starts a total war...now if they target my city and i live i will be in the White house and find Bush and Scream my ass off at him
nickkid11.. I want to make this simple and clear, Iran has no nuclear weapons, nor do they have the capability to launch them on the US even if they did, so don't worry. My next point is that you would have a futile search looking for Bush at the White House as he is no longer the President. You had the chance to stop him when he was president and lacked the balls and a MILLION + dead Iraqi civilians have paid for this lack of balls with thier lives. Now you are repeating in Afghanistan...
With a history of being used as spies for the US, Iran has every reason to distrust the UN. The CIA also has a long history of planting stories in the foreign press which they later use as "evidence". The US cannot be and should not be trusted. If any country is interested in ensuring that the US will not attack them, they know that having nuclear weapons is the best course of action. The US, being a typical bully, only attacks those do not have the means of defending themselves.
Paul Jay took the words out of my mouth. How can Iran disprove a negative? Nobody can. According to Mr. Zlauvinen Iran is guilty until proven innocent.
Also Mr. Zlauvinen deflected every question about Israel. Only to go on mumbling about Iran.
Isnt there anyone left who isnt bought and paid for these days?
Can this guy make up his mind, "my organization" or "our organization". What a worthless piece of shit standing here telling lies and wishing for millions of dead children. Makes me sick looking at him. We should bomb the fuck out of Argentina too.
So this UN rep of IAEA, basically is saying that because they need to know if Iran will make Nukes or not, they need to know what kind of missile technology they have... And of course, expect them to ask for more info after that...
Israel seems to be the problem here, their Nukes, that do exist, have a VIP pass.
Yes, they asked saddam hussain to answer the impossible, to prove a negative.
as long as Iran doesn't enrich to over 90%, which is what is needed for a nuclear weapon, there isn't a problem, up to now they've mastered the enrichment to barely 3%, so they have a long way to go yet, and to do this they would have to kick out the IAEA inspectors and withdraw from the NPT.
Excellent point! Mr Zlauvinen's answer to Jay's very pointed question was unconvincing and amounted to "soothing noises" or mumbling. You can't prove a negative, and Israeli track record indicated that the fabrication of these documents is well within their MO.
Gustavo, he is asking you, if iran is able to create a nuc bomb now. they obviously can't and don't repeat the same point about uranium amount 3 times. it needs more than just the right amount of uranium. also why are you avoiding talking about israel or answering questions about them? and always switchin the topic to iran?...wtf. paul is asking the right question the mainstream media never asks and gustavo don't respond properly. you just point your finger..be real gustavo..be real
U.S. intelligence itself has said that Iran would be incapable of developing a nuke within ten years, I have read the articles myself. They are interested in nuclear power which they have ever right to obtain. The harsh sanctions imposed on Iran from the U.S. and the world make them have to be totally self sufficient for every need they have.
Its funny that Gustavo acknowledge the Israeli or any other countries security concern when asked about intelligence, but when it comes to Iran, "they are obliged to tell us everything".
I'll break it down simply here....The U.S. is trying desperately to build public support for ANOTHER preemptive war in the middle east to obtain the third largest oil reserve in the world behind Iraq who they already illegally invaded and stole their oil. The U.S. is bitter since the dictator they installed (the Shah) was overthrown, and they got cut out of the oil reserves.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nuclear weapons require 'enriched' fuel... nuclear power does not. Reactors that run off enriched fuel have been obsolete for thirty years.
The fact that Iran is investing in a completely obsolete reactor design would lead a person to think that electricity isn't what they are interested in.
Of course it is possible that they're just morons who don't know what they're doing... but in either case they deserve an invasion [ I have little tolerance for either nuclear weapons or incompetence].
Heads screwed on backwards over some lightbulbs, those both are scorchingly hot countries, wanting to add more heat to themselves, stupid, sufficient self sufficiencies greeneries can produce all they want and solar even more, maybe then sell it away to those others that for some strange reason cant figure out how to point a panel of solar cells at the sunshine.
Seeing these men: sometimes I have the feeling, that they are aliens, discussing what they are not able to understand; all this is nonsense, a kind of blablaba of experts all over the world. And we? want to live like the people 200 years ago! But better than 200 years ago. Or hundered. Or fifty.Or twenty. These following 20 years will decide the future of this earth. You can live like before: nothing happens! Or you can look upun your children.
The whole situation is as clear as mud, and who can you trust? It was clear that the US did their best to purge IAEA members not friendly to their agenda (Ritter/Blix), so why would Iran, or anybody else, trust them? Similarly, how can you trust info from the Israelis? Check out the Mossad's motto...And who could trust India or Pakistan to come clean? As for Reagan's declaration, that was purely for public consumption, and lord knows that the US would never agree to inspections.
This has been flagged as spam show
Paul is the only real journalist in the western world
sudan15 1 year ago
Paul is the only real journalist in the western world
sudan15 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Paul is the only real journalist in the western world
sudan15 1 year ago
Paul is the only real journalist in the western world
sudan15 1 year ago
Jews, Christians, and Muslims better hope that each of their religions is correct......because in the name of "RELIGION", Millions have been slain.....and even today.....we are being driven into the destruction of our planet in the name of "RELIGION"......
14revolutioncalling 2 years ago
Well done, Paul.
You are so dead-pan in asking those very pertinent questions.
They may try to squiggle out of it, but you score a goal every time.
Keep it up!
Seanoooog 2 years ago 7
Mr. Zlauvinen became visibly uncomfortable when the interview was directed to Israel. It's like he's slowly realizing this interview isn't being done by a sell-out news hack,but a reporter truly asking hard questions. He almost seems stunned at one point! LOL!
Priceless! I love you guys, TheRealNews! Keep it coming, you guys are awesome! And you better not get famous and go sell out, either! I mean it!! lolol
God Bless The Real News Network!
Truthseekr07 2 years ago 11
Truthseeker07, Don`t they all. From Belgium to Paris, DC to Denmark; Zionists have a tight gripon the Western countries and by extension the world. They`re under the yoke of zionism.Servants must serve their masters or else
inexorableJmcle 2 years ago
Obama's the Antichrist in the White House
Pass this message on to the whole world
Put the video of the Beast's Marks on your channel page like I did.
DorjePawo 2 years ago
Gustavo Zlauvinen has diarrhea of the mouth.
It looks like we're in for another fake hunt for WMDs!
kip2778 2 years ago 4
This IAEA guy was given the go ahead to work for the Agency by israel (Formerly Palestine). No one works for the IAEA with out the approval of israel and the United states. israel dictates to America and then America, at the behest of israel, dictates to the world
Ibrahim2025A 2 years ago 3
Paul, this was a well done interview. You posed very legitimate, Mature and intellectual questions to this IAEA guy; but your questions were met with asinine answers. He self-inflictingly wounded himself with his nonsensical arguments. Paul, well done and thanks
Ibrahim2025A 2 years ago 4
israel (Formerly Palestine) will never disarm and it dictates to the west, but iran or any Middle-eastern country won`t be allowed to possess any N-weapons as that creates balance of power in the region and makes israel as an equal in terms of power and not a militarily powerful country as it is today
Ibrahim2025A 2 years ago
Palestine formerly Judea, given to the Israelite people by Almighty G-d who in the end will decide for us, not nuclear weapons
arigreenblatt 2 years ago
your right, the final hour will not come until the muslims fight the jews at that time the stones will speak "muslim there is a jew hiding behind me come and kill him"!
sudan15 1 year ago
you cannot prove a negative. it is impossible
kekeke01 2 years ago
Zlauvinen is a LIAR
ragenut2112 2 years ago
I like the "Even the closest allies don't share information with us". Then why does Iran have to share its secret information outside its obligations. The argument doesn't stand up either about buying fuel because then it puts them in the position of relying on other parties who can use it against them politically as has been done before. We need to lead by example and be fair and let other countries be free and evolve naturally like we did and still do.
rsnic 2 years ago
Well said.
Ibrahim2025A 2 years ago
DON'T TRUST ISRAEL OR THE UN!
timhavens 2 years ago
good reporting
0fred00 2 years ago 2
the guy from the IAEA seemed almost unsure what he was talking about...
good reporting job though =P
kwillyou22 2 years ago
this guy is a dumbass
shaqLegend08 2 years ago
he is a zionist and he said quote "We have to double cross."
nomarac2 2 years ago
I just want you to clarify something... You do indeed find this to be bullshit, yes?
wdchrismon 2 years ago
yes.. indeed
cute chick 9 o'clock! in white!
nickkid11 - bush is back in texas. you can scream your ass off at him, and see if it changes anything
patientx81 2 years ago 2
Want to see what Israel is about?
Look up what happened to the USS Liberty 42 years ago today.
Paetaor 2 years ago 2
Bush should have sent troops to iraq to check for nuclear weapons but instead he just starts a total war...now if they target my city and i live i will be in the White house and find Bush and Scream my ass off at him
nickkid11 2 years ago
nickkid11.. I want to make this simple and clear, Iran has no nuclear weapons, nor do they have the capability to launch them on the US even if they did, so don't worry. My next point is that you would have a futile search looking for Bush at the White House as he is no longer the President. You had the chance to stop him when he was president and lacked the balls and a MILLION + dead Iraqi civilians have paid for this lack of balls with thier lives. Now you are repeating in Afghanistan...
000deadcalm000 2 years ago 2
With a history of being used as spies for the US, Iran has every reason to distrust the UN. The CIA also has a long history of planting stories in the foreign press which they later use as "evidence". The US cannot be and should not be trusted. If any country is interested in ensuring that the US will not attack them, they know that having nuclear weapons is the best course of action. The US, being a typical bully, only attacks those do not have the means of defending themselves.
FRTothus 2 years ago
Paul Jay took the words out of my mouth. How can Iran disprove a negative? Nobody can. According to Mr. Zlauvinen Iran is guilty until proven innocent.
Also Mr. Zlauvinen deflected every question about Israel. Only to go on mumbling about Iran.
Isnt there anyone left who isnt bought and paid for these days?
Northern5tar 2 years ago
I'm completely with you, mate. he is basically ignoring the question to keep his iran-is-so-bad track.
SickBang 2 years ago
Can this guy make up his mind, "my organization" or "our organization". What a worthless piece of shit standing here telling lies and wishing for millions of dead children. Makes me sick looking at him. We should bomb the fuck out of Argentina too.
russianpride415 2 years ago
So this UN rep of IAEA, basically is saying that because they need to know if Iran will make Nukes or not, they need to know what kind of missile technology they have... And of course, expect them to ask for more info after that...
Israel seems to be the problem here, their Nukes, that do exist, have a VIP pass.
asperin 2 years ago
i am SO SICK of isreal
peckiledorf 2 years ago 4
what about israel with 200 nuclear weapons ?
javedrizwan 2 years ago 6
Excellent interview Paul!
Meloman0001 2 years ago 5
All war is deception.
Sun Tzu
boots920 2 years ago 5
Jay asked a good question. How do you prove something that's not there? Isn't that partly how we got into Iraq?
liike28 2 years ago 3
Yes, they asked saddam hussain to answer the impossible, to prove a negative.
as long as Iran doesn't enrich to over 90%, which is what is needed for a nuclear weapon, there isn't a problem, up to now they've mastered the enrichment to barely 3%, so they have a long way to go yet, and to do this they would have to kick out the IAEA inspectors and withdraw from the NPT.
andystokie 2 years ago 6
Excellent point! Mr Zlauvinen's answer to Jay's very pointed question was unconvincing and amounted to "soothing noises" or mumbling. You can't prove a negative, and Israeli track record indicated that the fabrication of these documents is well within their MO.
buhgoil 2 years ago 5
Gustavo, he is asking you, if iran is able to create a nuc bomb now. they obviously can't and don't repeat the same point about uranium amount 3 times. it needs more than just the right amount of uranium. also why are you avoiding talking about israel or answering questions about them? and always switchin the topic to iran?...wtf. paul is asking the right question the mainstream media never asks and gustavo don't respond properly. you just point your finger..be real gustavo..be real
SickBang 2 years ago 2
U.S. intelligence itself has said that Iran would be incapable of developing a nuke within ten years, I have read the articles myself. They are interested in nuclear power which they have ever right to obtain. The harsh sanctions imposed on Iran from the U.S. and the world make them have to be totally self sufficient for every need they have.
crydixxx 2 years ago 2
Its funny that Gustavo acknowledge the Israeli or any other countries security concern when asked about intelligence, but when it comes to Iran, "they are obliged to tell us everything".
WhatAboutBut 2 years ago 3
Hell, I wonder if the US has been inspected as well as Russia and all nuke powers.
makeitallrite 2 years ago
I'll break it down simply here....The U.S. is trying desperately to build public support for ANOTHER preemptive war in the middle east to obtain the third largest oil reserve in the world behind Iraq who they already illegally invaded and stole their oil. The U.S. is bitter since the dictator they installed (the Shah) was overthrown, and they got cut out of the oil reserves.
crydixxx 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nuclear weapons require 'enriched' fuel... nuclear power does not. Reactors that run off enriched fuel have been obsolete for thirty years.
The fact that Iran is investing in a completely obsolete reactor design would lead a person to think that electricity isn't what they are interested in.
Of course it is possible that they're just morons who don't know what they're doing... but in either case they deserve an invasion [ I have little tolerance for either nuclear weapons or incompetence].
ThotAum 2 years ago
Go for it, hero. I'll chip in for a shotgun and camo face-paint, and you can give it your best shot. Semper fi.
flyhead2 2 years ago
I wonder if Israel has been inspected.
marcus3379 2 years ago 4
Israel didn't sign the NPT
crydixxx 2 years ago 3
Maybe Iran should do the same? Sign out of NPT and then Gustavo would have to argument in the same swift way as he do when it comes to Israel.
WhatAboutBut 2 years ago 2
Who the fuck owns this youtube and keeps eating my comments.
GREEN smelly green smelly, yes alll wonderful productions of free energy, look Ma no costly potatoes no more.
grinzella 2 years ago
Heads screwed on backwards over some lightbulbs, those both are scorchingly hot countries, wanting to add more heat to themselves, stupid, sufficient self sufficiencies greeneries can produce all they want and solar even more, maybe then sell it away to those others that for some strange reason cant figure out how to point a panel of solar cells at the sunshine.
grinzella 2 years ago
Seeing these men: sometimes I have the feeling, that they are aliens, discussing what they are not able to understand; all this is nonsense, a kind of blablaba of experts all over the world. And we? want to live like the people 200 years ago! But better than 200 years ago. Or hundered. Or fifty.Or twenty. These following 20 years will decide the future of this earth. You can live like before: nothing happens! Or you can look upun your children.
HR5308 2 years ago
The whole situation is as clear as mud, and who can you trust? It was clear that the US did their best to purge IAEA members not friendly to their agenda (Ritter/Blix), so why would Iran, or anybody else, trust them? Similarly, how can you trust info from the Israelis? Check out the Mossad's motto...And who could trust India or Pakistan to come clean? As for Reagan's declaration, that was purely for public consumption, and lord knows that the US would never agree to inspections.
flyhead2 2 years ago 4
This is a very important interview, and he is asking the right questions, waiting for part three. Good one.
P3t3rG1 2 years ago 4
it's none of our business if they have nukes. should they attack us because we have nukes?
LouieArrighi 2 years ago 2
because we're the U.S. and we're better than everyone else.
Such arrogance can never be stoic.
ot63 2 years ago 5
Good point...
AmNotHere911 2 years ago