Added: 3 years ago
From: HunHubi
Views: 58,869
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Maďari maju poniki a nie tanky, lebo su to skurvene mongoloidne typy s kryvimi nohami !!!

  • What a powerful army I hope one day Turkey and Hungary will be unified to destroy gypsy Romania :))). Greetings from a turkish brother. Hajra Tùran !!!

  • @rrsto Look who's talking ! In Turkey all the population is dark skin coloured! In Germany you are the kings of the garbage! In your country a woman is something very expansive, you usually buy it for wife! In rest you all are jerks! We, the Romanians, we are not gypsy, but you the turks are the same with them. Our gypsy work for he garbage companies and they buy their wifes!

  • Szép és nosztalgiás tank a T72, de sajnos már elavult. Arról már nem is szólva hogy olyan a tankparkunk mint anno a MiG-29-es gépparkunk volt. Van néhány de abból is csak 1-2 üzemel. Leopard tankokat magyarországnak!

  • IT IS SO FUCKING BEAUTIFULLLLLL WOW, a Destroyer

  • Jó cucc ez a t-72, csak az elektronikát kellene benne modernizálni.

  • crash test a bus wit that shit

  • "kedves"xdl125.A hrckocsi a mai hadviselés fontos és ekengethetetlen keléke az nem baj hogy te nem értessz ehez az a baj hogy kiknek kellene azok sem.A világ minden konfliktusában ott vannak, voltak,és lessznek is. Ja városba is be lehet menni velük csak tudni kell hogyan a koptert is lelövik és a humvee-ket is kilövik kicsit könnyebben mint a tnkot. Persze szügség van mindegyikre és nem létezhet egyik sem a másik nélkül ezt a világ minden hadserege tudja(kiv magyar).

  • whatever, FUCK AMERICA!!!

  • its still better than those western shitty stuffs.....

  • @carbon0HUN Then you do not know reality. Challenger 2, Leopard 2, Merkava 4 are ALL far superior to this tank. The M1 Abrams (although it hurts to say so), is also superior to this.

  • @mistamikey123455 This tank can still be upgraded to a level, where it can still take on those! The difference will not be much than and can be compensated by crew experience and tactics.

  • @S300V Thats REALLY stretching it. This thing would have to undergo such massive upgrades it wouldnt be fair to call it a T-72 anymore. Plus, Russias military training (again, hate to say it), has been inferior to what the USSR trained... Many arent even trained completely.

  • @mistamikey123455 Well in this sense, it wouldnt be fair to call Merkava, Merkava or consider M1A2 just a version of M1 Abrams. There has been many drivatives of T-72, came a long way since the initial version built in the early 70s! Infact T-90 can be considered as a culmination of the experiences gained with T-72. The Israelis upgraded M60, they called it Magach7. So? Its still related to M60, they used M60 main components. As for training it depends on who is using the tech. Its another story

  • @S300V Wow, you are mis informed. The Merkava is 110% Israeli. It is not a version of the Abrams. It is completely different. I don't know where you learned that, but fix that.

    Go google Merkava. It was designed in the late 70's, early 80's. All 100% Israeli. They tried the Abrams before making the Merkava, but the Abrams could not handle the Golan Heights. Maybe I misunderstood you, since the way you type is confusing. I understand what you mean, but look at the Magach 7. Its no longer a M60.

  • @mistamikey123455 No no no! You missunderstood me! I meant that the realation between Merkava 1 and Merkava 4 is so distant, the it wouldnt be fair to still call it a Merkava! At least that is the conclusion one may come to after reading the comment you wrote: "such massive upgrades it wouldnt be fair to call it a T-72 anymore". Similarly in the case of M1 and M1A2 comparison. It doesent realy matter what we call it! The basic T-72 design has still much potential! Like M60 had in Israel.

  • @S300V I thought I misunderstood :P. Thats why it is called Merkava 1-4. Same situation with the T-55 - T-90. They are essentially the same family was massive changes, like the Merkava.

    I get what you mean.

  • @mistamikey123455 T-90 is an extensive upgrade of the T-72. the T-55 has nothing to do with the T-72 and the first model that shares similar traits but is not the originator of the T-72 is the T-64. they are not the same thing as the Merkavas, which are all upgrades of the same basic original model.

  • @mistamikey123455 Excuse me sir but the first merkavas had m60 diesel engines and the brithis L7 105mm barrel and american and german computers a board

  • @Davieeee87 Not the same as what he said. He meant that the Merkava is just a variant of the M1 Abrams.

    The new Merkava 4s are completely Israeli. The only thing is the engine which is german, and the gun is based off a german design.

  • @mistamikey123455 Hello Sir You mean the German Klaus Maffei Wegman diesel engine and the heat changers and the Rheinmetall 120mm gun ( the izraeli version is the american license) the amis and israelis use the same amo

  • @mistamikey123455 I thought that the merkava uses a 105mm british L-7 main gun and squash head rounds?we sent tons of surplus 105's and ammo over to Isreal back in the 80's when we converted over to the german 120mm's for our M-1A2's...our tank,using sabot's shot the shit out of Iraqi T-72's and T-80's at ranges past 3500m.their 125mm Russian main gun was a sorry joke and their rounds just bounced off our armour,,,

  • @bobb22ful Your correct. The MK 1-2 used a 105mm L-7. The MK 3-4 use a 120mm L-44 Israeli made version. The older merks are either being decomed and parts used to make APCs. We are currently "modernizing" our tanks, adding some 400 more Merkava 4s to replace the older MK 1 and 2s. The Magach medium tank series (based off the Patton tanks, that is used for urban warfare mostly) has a 105mm so it will use that ammo and such.

  • tök mind1 hogy veszekedtek gyerekek, de ez a tank ma már semmire nem jó...

  • dam tanks think they own the car park !

  • Erős Magyar Honvédséget ! Bebtó Zoltán

  • Kedves XDL 125 te áltudományos civil szakértő! Mihez kezdesz a helikoptereiddel mondjuk szakadó esőben, és kb óránként 80km/h szélben? A Humvvee-idet lazán széttaposnám, mint a filmen látható ASCONát. Legközelebb gondold át, mielőtt itt bárkit alázni kezdenél!

  • nice tank.does hungary still operate them?i heard 77 were given as a gift to iraq(kind of a waste)

  • Mihez kénének új tankok?

  • Havat kotorni az utakról. :D

  • új tankok kellenének már .....

  • ezeket a szar ruszki tankokot nem tuggyatok man kicserelni??!!

    az olahoknak jobb van!!!

    mongyuk 1sorban a zsidoorseget kell penzelni majd ha marad akkor a Honvedseget!!!

    fasszopo zsidomagyarorszag!!!

  • Ha adsz pénzt akkor veszek neked új tankokat.

  • jobb lenne nem csak okoskodni es pofazni hanem elhajtottatok volna a mocskos rablobandat!!!

    es akkor erre is lenne penz!!!

  • csak az a baj hogy a faszszopó oláhokat pénzelik az amcsik meg mi a fasznak tank? városban sebezhetőek, városon kívül meg inkább helikoptereket meg mozgékony könnyűpáncélosokat (pl Humvee) használnak. hülye agymosott szélsőjobbos segg

    u.i.: tanulj meg írni

  • Hol találtak egy üzemképes hk-t ? Csak nem az én Büszkémet vakarták elő ? Bár lehet hogy Gulyás öcsi rettenetese ? Rég volt,igaz sem volt ! Szabadszálláson volt egy csapat , akik szakértettek a tankokhoz ... Persze a maiak is ... Ez lehet akár igaz is,de engem pl. kiküldtek Kijevbe tanulni,ahol megmutathattam,hogy kell az SzGR-t összezárni alacsony akkufeszültségnél,hogy a sztartert életre keljen ... Persze ezt én is Gulyás Öcsitől tanultam .

  • That's the same hunk of metal we used for target practice in Iraq. I feel bad for the soldiers who gotta ride around in that metal casket.

  • No T-72 is not the same. In Iraq USA destroyed usless copies of these. No composite armour, no protection systems.

  • Regardless I wouldn't want to be in any tank thats facing a M1A1. It would spell certain death.

  • Why so? M1A1 is not invulnerable! T-72s 125mm gun can blast it with a HEAT shell. Besides there are better protected tanks than M1A1. Challenger 2 for exmpl.

  • @S300V Merkava 4 blows all others out of the water protection wise.

  • @mistamikey123455 I consider it to be about the same as Chal2. The frontal engine feature is added protection, but the Chal2 is a smaller target somewhat.

  • me too> how much aprox?

  • Just aprox 2million US dollars :D so if ya bought it don't forget to invite me to your own crash test ;)

  • Cool. I want one. :)

  • its better to have something then nothing.

  • @Popsicle22754 So you rather have herpes than nothing?

  • Dont fix whatts not broken

  • Basszus, ez már második kocsim amivel rossz helyen parkoltam!!!:(

  • Nagyon zsííííír!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more