@mcduff21543 Yes, I know about the Mythbusters version. Adam and Jamie told me about that episode when I was filmed with them for a new TV show recently.
don't waste your time and money using bowling balls. I built one standing about ten feet tall for a film i made, and bowling balls do not work after the third or forth hit.
the problem is the inner center of the balls are composed of some sort of dense cork. this material interrupts the kinetic energy. the energy is forced to go around the ball and transfer to the next one instead of going directly through it.
good, idea, but the material bowling balls are made out of is made to ABSORB energy (is in being dropped on the lane floor), which is why this didn't work so well.
for a second i thought the laws of physics were broken on that last swing. but i realized that the balls hit at different times causing two balls to rise on the opposite side.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS you will die in seven days if you dont post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do tomorrow will be the best day of your life
if the balls in this video had more density, they would put more energy back out. If they aren't dense enough, they will just absorb the energy, like these are doing.
or is that caused by another property of the balls? Please correct me if I'm wrong here. OFC there has to be a limit to how dense they can be. But I would think thats what matters.
well density does have an effect in terms of mass, ie a ping pong ball vs a golf ball, but its another physical property that determines how much energy a material puts back out.
ie a super bouncy ball will have a very high raito if energy put back out, whereas a tempur pillow will have almost no energy put back out.
what people may not realize is that steel is bouncy, not like rubber, but allot more than a bowling ball.
Ok. I follow you on that. But at least these balls do not have the same amount of the right properties, to transfer enough energy to the next. And because they are not equal to each other, the transfer of kinetic energy fades quickly, and it gets unstable. Do we agree on this? :P
Not sure if I formulated this the right way, but I hope you get my point.
The balls should at least share the same density, and have other similar properties, for this sculpture to work as intended.
Yeah, thats my sculpture, and Yeah I know it could work better, but I made it on a whim with found object bowling balls. I could improve it by using the exact same size balls, with no finger holes, but I don't feel like it. At one time it was lined up perfectly by laser, but I rented it out to the HBO show Six Feet Under, and the movie Raise Your Voice, so it got a bit "off" after being moved around so much.
@BruceGray I dont think finger holes and imperfect alignment have much to do with it. It has mostly to do with the energy absorbing materials a bowling ball is made of and the inelasticity of the collisions. (probably)
@BruceGray I dont think finger holes and imperfect alignment have much to do with it. It has mostly to do with the energy absorbing materials a bowling ball is made of and the inelasticity of the collisions.
Too much energy loss in noise and ropes, the balls also are probably lacking the proper consistency, but its a neat toy, i would get one for my living room!
yeah the struture needs to be as accurate as posible to demonstrate the princibles involved with minimal interferance, ie equal and non-ellastic cables
When I was hit on the head with a cricket ball (I was 12) it cleared the delusion I was having that I was Albert Sweitzer. Since then I've worked hard all my life to become a baby-sitter so I can 'rock the cradle', I've only just found out that Newtons cradle doesn't have any babies in it, it is in fact Newtons Swing. He didn't use this term because of the wife-swapping associations it has.
good idea using bowling balls. However, I do not think that the material they are made out of is hard enough to efficiently transfer the kinetic energy. Now if those were all solid steel like the mi nature version this is based on - it would work much better.
Now do 3...
Sandarpan 1 week ago
If I had a dollar for every pixel in this video I would have have one dollar
MegaHappypotter 1 month ago 7
big balls
MegaRYANNNNNNN 1 month ago
pull it back as far as it will go and throw it down see what happens
nothinbuteverythin 2 months ago
I have one on my desk
crazedmiget 2 months ago
So... like, if you stuck your hand in between one of those things would it hurt?
55vampirelover 2 months ago
dont make it so faster coz it can crack your balls )
kidnowbig 2 months ago
That noise is amazing :D Me gusta
abombinasnowman 2 months ago
Mythbusters did it will ball bearing, at this size scall it was only off by a few percent effececy compaired to a normal size cradle
mcduff21543 2 months ago 11
@mcduff21543 Yes, I know about the Mythbusters version. Adam and Jamie told me about that episode when I was filmed with them for a new TV show recently.
BruceGray 2 months ago 5
they did it on ed eddn eddy qith swingsets and boulders
danielwhitman 3 months ago
The oscillation is transmitted to the other pendulums that are supposed to stay still.
This is because the support structure is not solid enough.
nsugathadasa 3 months ago
Are you boring guys??? go in a stripclup!
shermy2 3 months ago
[inset iCarly reference here]
THEgrandPOOPbah 3 months ago
okej im began whit watching mikael jackson and know im seeing gigants balls WTF!!!
benty1997 3 months ago
they would work better if the lines were longer. Like twice as much.Gives the center balls more time to set up together for next hit.
Esuper1 3 months ago
Can you build me a sex swing?
Wlfwnd91 3 months ago
How could you dislike this! Good job!
zevon1964 3 months ago
Its Spencer's Newton Balls
joshua123ldrago 3 months ago
Dude no matter what you do with it the kinetic energy will always be lost at one point.
Kiara1331 3 months ago
this might have worked better if you had longer ropes
omgalreadyinuse 4 months ago
the only large size balls available are of stone, granite for example but methinks they would break.
MucusFelidae 4 months ago
I'm planning on making a 6' tall version, had considered using bowling balls, but it seems like they're too soft.
spencerc6 7 months ago
@spencerc6
don't waste your time and money using bowling balls. I built one standing about ten feet tall for a film i made, and bowling balls do not work after the third or forth hit.
the problem is the inner center of the balls are composed of some sort of dense cork. this material interrupts the kinetic energy. the energy is forced to go around the ball and transfer to the next one instead of going directly through it.
keep the faith, and good luck.
starmanbridges 5 months ago
it's modern art mann.....
hosewater10 8 months ago
looks like dropping balls.......
Sano22n 9 months ago
your balls are so big
wakisaki 9 months ago
balls of steel
therealandycook 11 months ago
next, make a one with bowling pins
megadudeley 1 year ago
hey man you were so cool , gimme five , i mean five dollars
jupiterscastle 1 year ago
hey, its spencer shay!
kalebsta 1 year ago
maby the metal transfers the energy more efectivley other then the bowling balls rubber inside
ICHIGOZAMA6994 1 year ago
Balls are too soft; energy transfer suffers.
TheMrBlinx 1 year ago
metal work better i i do think
007foppe 1 year ago
my balls hurt
torosyan 1 year ago
PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG PONG.
That is all.
ImprezaImpresser 1 year ago
click clack? its called newtons
TheKrockmaster 1 year ago
Fun
TheToasterWaffel 1 year ago
Wheres the giant desk for this?
LBTennis 1 year ago 4
good, idea, but the material bowling balls are made out of is made to ABSORB energy (is in being dropped on the lane floor), which is why this didn't work so well.
skiierboy01 1 year ago
for i carly rember
aqualuv69 1 year ago
i never found newton´s cradle near a little interesting, it´s just logic
santiagodebellavista 1 year ago
Use some Solid Metal to prevent them from fidgeting.
DarrenDiAntonio 1 year ago
balls are hollow..wood inside i guess ? you need full metal balls.
and string needs to stretch ..they are kinda lose cause of the weight the balls have..
nice effort tho.
Vleesball 1 year ago
balls are touching.
Zwank36 1 year ago
for a second i thought the laws of physics were broken on that last swing. but i realized that the balls hit at different times causing two balls to rise on the opposite side.
wiez5 1 year ago
well duh this is a newtons cradle
habitatskater90210 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS you will die in seven days if you dont post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do tomorrow will be the best day of your life
DominoWave 2 years ago
well they are equal. But hollow so energy gets lost anyway
basis64 2 years ago
wow. That balls is big
Olciia97 2 years ago
I won't put my nuts there XD hahah just kidding.
mito0101 2 years ago
"With every action there's an equal and opposite reaction."
TarrHitsJellyWorld 2 years ago
Actually the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, which has noting to do with Newtons third law.
MoonEyes2k 2 years ago 4
what if you put water, sand or bee bees in a middle one it would stop the sway totaly.
1Ryon 2 years ago
If the centre was a beehive it would most certainly get squashed on the first swing, and the Queen would send out her bee bees to sting all humans
heistsy 2 years ago
It needs metal ones to work right.
stopglobalswarming 2 years ago
Balls of Steel....Balls Balls
CODMASTA 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im gonna rip of your head and shit down your throat......
mynameaborat9000 2 years ago
Time to kick ass and chew some bubble gum, and im all outta gum!
CODMASTA 2 years ago
Those balls arent dense enough.
Popupkille 2 years ago
its not the density, it how much energy they put back out compared to how much they absorb.
If bowling balls were made out of steel, they would bounce down the lane probably causing allot of damage to the floor.
doesn't really have to do with the density.
supermatthew222 2 years ago
Well. To build on your arguement.
if the balls in this video had more density, they would put more energy back out. If they aren't dense enough, they will just absorb the energy, like these are doing.
or is that caused by another property of the balls? Please correct me if I'm wrong here. OFC there has to be a limit to how dense they can be. But I would think thats what matters.
Popupkille 2 years ago
well density does have an effect in terms of mass, ie a ping pong ball vs a golf ball, but its another physical property that determines how much energy a material puts back out.
ie a super bouncy ball will have a very high raito if energy put back out, whereas a tempur pillow will have almost no energy put back out.
what people may not realize is that steel is bouncy, not like rubber, but allot more than a bowling ball.
supermatthew222 2 years ago
Ok. I follow you on that. But at least these balls do not have the same amount of the right properties, to transfer enough energy to the next. And because they are not equal to each other, the transfer of kinetic energy fades quickly, and it gets unstable. Do we agree on this? :P
Not sure if I formulated this the right way, but I hope you get my point.
The balls should at least share the same density, and have other similar properties, for this sculpture to work as intended.
Popupkille 2 years ago
It needs balls of steel
ellhow 2 years ago
Yeah, too much energy loss... but the effort used to create this giant version of Newton's Cradle is simply impressive.
lorekingwn 2 years ago 33
wtf
amfikz 2 years ago
Yeah, thats my sculpture, and Yeah I know it could work better, but I made it on a whim with found object bowling balls. I could improve it by using the exact same size balls, with no finger holes, but I don't feel like it. At one time it was lined up perfectly by laser, but I rented it out to the HBO show Six Feet Under, and the movie Raise Your Voice, so it got a bit "off" after being moved around so much.
BruceGray 2 years ago 8
u built it how much money u get for it being on a movie and a ty show?
zeratul575 2 years ago
@BruceGray I dont think finger holes and imperfect alignment have much to do with it. It has mostly to do with the energy absorbing materials a bowling ball is made of and the inelasticity of the collisions. (probably)
htomerif 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BruceGray I dont think finger holes and imperfect alignment have much to do with it. It has mostly to do with the energy absorbing materials a bowling ball is made of and the inelasticity of the collisions.
htomerif 2 days ago
It doesnt seem very "kinetic" but that could be fixed with proper materials i bet.
Lexphoto 2 years ago
Too much energy loss in noise and ropes, the balls also are probably lacking the proper consistency, but its a neat toy, i would get one for my living room!
sean6006 2 years ago
put your handa in there i dare u 2
rockpoplop222 2 years ago
Sweet!
butterflynflower 2 years ago
Nice
geraldsjackass 2 years ago
it dosnt really have a goal so it cant really 'work or not work' technically
sk8endorphin 3 years ago
its newtons cradle but giant
luvsean13 3 years ago
it not newtons cradle,its more like newtons hammock
matthew11174 3 years ago
No, its newtons big swinging ball sack.
Ryandri0d 2 years ago
bowling balls are the wrong density
ThatMonsterMan 3 years ago
yeah the struture needs to be as accurate as posible to demonstrate the princibles involved with minimal interferance, ie equal and non-ellastic cables
alecTHElion 3 years ago
it might run if you strap the three balls to gether
stirlingsteamboy08 3 years ago
it's called newton's cradle
luvsean13 3 years ago
the cable is too short
coetzee92 3 years ago
it doeent keep going(crap)
stirlingsteamboy08 3 years ago 3
because they are bowling balls
luvsean13 3 years ago 2
great...
Ijustneedthatsong 3 years ago
When I was hit on the head with a cricket ball (I was 12) it cleared the delusion I was having that I was Albert Sweitzer. Since then I've worked hard all my life to become a baby-sitter so I can 'rock the cradle', I've only just found out that Newtons cradle doesn't have any babies in it, it is in fact Newtons Swing. He didn't use this term because of the wife-swapping associations it has.
harrynicholas 3 years ago
good idea using bowling balls. However, I do not think that the material they are made out of is hard enough to efficiently transfer the kinetic energy. Now if those were all solid steel like the mi nature version this is based on - it would work much better.
EyeOnTheTV 3 years ago 27
Fail!
bone656 3 years ago
can u do this with more than 5 balls? I bet u wuld get a slower raction for the energy to move
FlyingDuckMan360 3 years ago
you can use more but the strength lowers the more there are
runie360 3 years ago
Imagine one of those balls hitting YOUR balls! OUCH!
speedaddict2008 3 years ago
not work ehh?
not metal ehh?
jackkjack 3 years ago
I always thought it would be cool for it to be done with 5 wrecking balls.
jhzab666 3 years ago 2
rofl. nice idea
Ingeniosis 3 years ago 2
I was waiting for the balls to hit the guy's face... more fun!
bluetorch13 3 years ago
its not optimized :)
pjebarakus 3 years ago
You need heavier balls. Now it completely misses the point of the experiment.
F00dTube 3 years ago
use your balls then? :D
krirre 3 years ago
I take that as a.. I don't how to take that. :p
F00dTube 3 years ago
Hehe, just kidding ^^
krirre 3 years ago
was ist das für ein scheiß Video!!!!!!!
vimizum 3 years ago
wow, so much energy is lost during THOSE collisions
hl2alyx 3 years ago 3
i think that the bowling balls are the right size but the strings aint long enough... he need to raise it so he could put longer stings on it...
154309 4 years ago
HAHAHA cos nie wyszlo :P
smugowa 4 years ago
Maybe if the strings were longer?
Pretty cool.
mnorth1 4 years ago
cool
putdownyourguns 4 years ago
Neat :)
daapz 5 years ago