Lets not forget DArista's book is written from the perspective of someone on the outside looking in and because she doesn't have all the facts, she assigns ominous value to whatever she can't readily understand. I don't blame the fed for keeping their secrets. Should the cia or pentagon throw their books open for every Tom Dick and Harry who comes along? Thanks to the fed we enjoy a high level of wealth in the USA
Yes! This series of interviews has been a very informative, calm non-sensational assessment of the current finacial order. However, she does skirt around key issues regarding the fed's origins. Issues that help frame the debate. Issues that suggest conspiracy. The real news and its guests do there best to avoid the suggestion of conspiracy. Left gate keeping? or self censorship in a bid to retain "legitimacy"?
Dancing around the fact that moles know how to manipulate and exploit our financial system is more palatable to the herd and ultimately tracts faster and broader- very wise.
D'Arista is pretty loose with her explanation of the origin of the Fed, and Congress' authority regarding coinage. Banks didn't print money, they printed notes that were redeemable in gold and silver. Congress regulated coinage, and only gold and silver could be used for that purpose.
I really have to thank the real news for covering this topic. We rarely see it covered enough. I still wish a few more questions as to the Feds origins were asked such as:
- Who wrote the federal reserve act? Was it done by the same money trust that the public was told the fed would stop?
- How was it that income tax act started the same year?
- Does the Fed print (free) money and then loan it to the government at interest?
It took 6 years?? The federal reserve act was voted in by a few congressmembers during essentially what was a christmas break when most of congress was away. It was heavily contested for 6 years perhaps.
Lets not forget DArista's book is written from the perspective of someone on the outside looking in and because she doesn't have all the facts, she assigns ominous value to whatever she can't readily understand. I don't blame the fed for keeping their secrets. Should the cia or pentagon throw their books open for every Tom Dick and Harry who comes along? Thanks to the fed we enjoy a high level of wealth in the USA
Zendout1 6 months ago
I'd like to see Jane D'Arista and Ron Paul discuss this issue.
RCinPAWA 2 years ago 3
Yes! This series of interviews has been a very informative, calm non-sensational assessment of the current finacial order. However, she does skirt around key issues regarding the fed's origins. Issues that help frame the debate. Issues that suggest conspiracy. The real news and its guests do there best to avoid the suggestion of conspiracy. Left gate keeping? or self censorship in a bid to retain "legitimacy"?
Gunt78 2 years ago 4
Dancing around the fact that moles know how to manipulate and exploit our financial system is more palatable to the herd and ultimately tracts faster and broader- very wise.
brainstewn 2 years ago 3
We need legitimacy, one foot at a time gunt.
oraqol 2 years ago
D'Arista is pretty loose with her explanation of the origin of the Fed, and Congress' authority regarding coinage. Banks didn't print money, they printed notes that were redeemable in gold and silver. Congress regulated coinage, and only gold and silver could be used for that purpose.
bbburton 2 years ago
Jane D'Arista is outstanding!
boballende 2 years ago 2
I really have to thank the real news for covering this topic. We rarely see it covered enough. I still wish a few more questions as to the Feds origins were asked such as:
- Who wrote the federal reserve act? Was it done by the same money trust that the public was told the fed would stop?
- How was it that income tax act started the same year?
- Does the Fed print (free) money and then loan it to the government at interest?
And so on.
sirellyn 2 years ago 2
It took 6 years?? The federal reserve act was voted in by a few congressmembers during essentially what was a christmas break when most of congress was away. It was heavily contested for 6 years perhaps.
sirellyn 2 years ago 2
A++ video.
Combine all these videos into one please.
martinaoe2 2 years ago 3
They new
Google - PBS Frontline The Warning
robb1031 2 years ago 4
Yep! Good show!
leeroynaggins 2 years ago