@dwmitch Maybe It doesn't mean anything. Does all good music have to mean something? My answer...NO. A painting is best as a painting without explaination. Same goes for music in my opinion.
@TheLittleDevil Of course music means something. Meaningless noise has no artistic value. We project meaning onto combinations of sounds to derive music. Of course, meaning can be ambiguous or even unknowable but it's still there. A painting is NOT best without explanation. Explanation gives context, context helps to understand meaning. Even if the concepts are broad, ambiguous or just downright odd, there is intention, expression and meaning there.
@rossvideosprint I don't agree. But that's Ok. Everyone has an opinion. So what does this song mean in your opinion? Also what does a painting of a bowl of fruit mean. What does the painting of the Mona Lisa mean. I'd like to know.
@TheLittleDevil Short answer: I don't know! I have no contextual background of the driving concepts behind this or the Mona Lisa. But think of it this way - without structure, meaning, and intention all we have is noise. Noise is transformed by our minds and language into music. Even if meaning is abstract, it is still there. The mere fact that someone created it gives it meaning as an expression and creation of the human mind. I'm happy to say I don't KNOW what this means.
@rossvideosprint What i was saying in my first post is a painting or a piece of music is best without a piece of paper beside it explaining what it means. You figure out what it means to you. Then again i do like noise music as well. THE NIHIST SPASM BAND. Check them out.
@TheLittleDevil Oh well there I agree. If an artist tries to explain themselves too much it completely negates the point of expressing something abstractly in the first place. Meaning is to be derived from the way in which we and the artist interact with the work, and that can always be relative, ambiguous or vague. But I'm fine with that. Trying to understand music is what makes its appreciation so worthwhile, even if hope of outlining any kind of meaning is untenable.
YVW! If you like this I recommend you take a look at some of the other work on my Dean358 channel. All created during the same era -- ah, the 80s :-) Cheers!
@GURAKASCA Could you please send me the plug in that increases the YouTube frame rate to see lip sync? (Just kidding!) Hey, it was the 80s! Tnx for watching!
I noticed that the version of the song used here is neither the version on Laurie's album "Mister Heartbreak," nor on Peter's album "So." Did Geffen and Warner Bros. use this as the official clip for both of them? Peace.
I don't remember delivering a master to either Geffen or Warner -- just WNET for the broadcast. The again, it's been a lotta miles and much haze since then :-)
@dean358 I found out about this video because someone was talking about the different mixes of the song. That person remembered one mix for "So," one for "Mister Heartbreak," and a third for this video. So if your mind is hazy, at least another person seems to be caught in the same haze.
Thanks for uploading these videos. I always love it when I find people on here who were involved in creating music videos before YouTube existed.
@dean358 I found out about this video because someone was talking about the different mixes of the song. That person remembered one mix for "So," one for "Mister Heartbreak," and a third for this video. So if your mind is hazy, at least another person seems to be caught in the same haze.
Thanks for uploading these videos. I always love it when I find people on here who were involved in creating music videos before YouTube existed.
Curious as to what you mean by "extreme dependence on images?" As in "images over content?" I wouldn't read all that much into this video -- it's what we were able to create given 48 hours for production and post. Oh, and I think your interpreting it is great :-)
@dean358 When I wrote the comment I thought about many people who believe looking good equals being good...those people who upload tons of pictures of themselves to social networks like facebook. Then, don't ask me why I was thinking about that LOL
I know some will hate me for trying to interpret this...I connect the video with the extreme dependence on images or what is seen that ppl is experiencing nowadays What do u think?
I remember waking up early to record this on WNET channel 13. My first exposure to both Peter Gabriel and Laurie Anderson, as well as Philip Glass and John Cage. Trippy times...
Laurie and Peter are lying on their backs on a blue screen floor. The camera is positioned above them. The motion isn't simulated - it's the two of them moving.
All lighting and shading were created in real time using Grass Valley 300 analog video switcher. The "spotlight" is a switcher wipe and the "shadow" is their matte signal repositioned and distorted with an ADO, then keyed behind them.
I was really thinking about "cast shadowing" in this example (Phong and Gourand are local illumination models applied in image synthesis) - maybe analog processors in mid 80's were computing real time Z-Buffering or ray tracing to get this amazing rendering.
You can purchase a 38 minute edit of the broadcast from Electronic Arts Intermix in NYC. (eai-dot-org). I've also posted ACT III as a video response above, as Nam June included ACT III in the broadcast. - Dean
That is some TRIPPY dancing!
yugenro 4 days ago
This looks like a film budget of $5 to make
NadrianATRS 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wonderful. Wishing you and yours a wonder-full, joyous and abundant New Year ♥ ♥ ♥
angelsonearth2007 2 months ago
beautiful, thanks.
Ferdiphone 2 months ago
A rare, rare recording. Every note, inflection, sound, word, beat perfect. So. Excellent So. There's people listening. Listening now. Watch out!
probrojeffro 2 months ago
Best video and sound quality of the three or so I've found, many thanks!
spaceboy537 2 months ago
Great upload, thanks for posting it!
gabbaro 2 months ago
This is one of my favs!
TheCosmicopus 3 months ago
great video :)
selfybeatz85 3 months ago
nice... best regards.
bubo181 3 months ago
Nice!
nickfatum1 3 months ago
Beautiful music video *****
thumbs up
• '♥. •' ¨) MH
52diddi 3 months ago
Very very nice tune and visual !!!*****
JampyKeys 3 months ago
Excellent!!! Classic!!!
VientDeMee 3 months ago
it does sound like he is saying pictures of bieber
pinkgirl123ish 3 months ago
excellent video
jaumecb2008 3 months ago
is it just me or at 3:44 it sounds like he's singing 'pictures of bieber' haha
SwaineMusic 3 months ago
I watched this on PBS, "Live from Off Center," when I was only 7 years old. For whatever reason I loved that show even if I didn't get it.
Mangina9000 3 months ago
thanks for this one
gelliedavid 4 months ago
What the hell is this song even about?
mjmjr2191 4 months ago
@mjmjr2191 Excellent. Birds.
LokiClock 4 months ago
@LokiClock Well then. there you have it, I suppose.
mjmjr2191 4 months ago
Fun !
Poemsapennyeach 5 months ago
How did I not know of this?!? I love it.
indiwise 7 months ago
Excellent video.
SergioKulpas 11 months ago
Excellent video.
SergioKulpas 11 months ago
awesome TOPquality video AND sound! amazing!!!
belgiumSteve 1 year ago
1:09 Creepy!!
Kg277 1 year ago
Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of Peter Gabriel. He's one of my biggest inspirations musically speaking, but I have to ask this.
Was this song just a drug fueled ramble? I've been trying to figure it out for years and can't even come close to putting any kind of meaning to it.
dwmitch 1 year ago
@dwmitch Maybe It doesn't mean anything. Does all good music have to mean something? My answer...NO. A painting is best as a painting without explaination. Same goes for music in my opinion.
TheLittleDevil 1 year ago
@TheLittleDevil Of course music means something. Meaningless noise has no artistic value. We project meaning onto combinations of sounds to derive music. Of course, meaning can be ambiguous or even unknowable but it's still there. A painting is NOT best without explanation. Explanation gives context, context helps to understand meaning. Even if the concepts are broad, ambiguous or just downright odd, there is intention, expression and meaning there.
rossvideosprint 1 year ago
@rossvideosprint I don't agree. But that's Ok. Everyone has an opinion.
TheLittleDevil 1 year ago
@rossvideosprint I don't agree. But that's Ok. Everyone has an opinion. So what does this song mean in your opinion? Also what does a painting of a bowl of fruit mean. What does the painting of the Mona Lisa mean. I'd like to know.
TheLittleDevil 1 year ago
@TheLittleDevil Short answer: I don't know! I have no contextual background of the driving concepts behind this or the Mona Lisa. But think of it this way - without structure, meaning, and intention all we have is noise. Noise is transformed by our minds and language into music. Even if meaning is abstract, it is still there. The mere fact that someone created it gives it meaning as an expression and creation of the human mind. I'm happy to say I don't KNOW what this means.
rossvideosprint 1 year ago
@rossvideosprint What i was saying in my first post is a painting or a piece of music is best without a piece of paper beside it explaining what it means. You figure out what it means to you. Then again i do like noise music as well. THE NIHIST SPASM BAND. Check them out.
TheLittleDevil 1 year ago
@TheLittleDevil Oh well there I agree. If an artist tries to explain themselves too much it completely negates the point of expressing something abstractly in the first place. Meaning is to be derived from the way in which we and the artist interact with the work, and that can always be relative, ambiguous or vague. But I'm fine with that. Trying to understand music is what makes its appreciation so worthwhile, even if hope of outlining any kind of meaning is untenable.
rossvideosprint 1 year ago
Lovelovelove this song. Never saw the video. Excellent video. :)
3salamanders 1 year ago
Laurie reminds me of the girl from minority report.
lordzhuge 1 year ago
I didn't know there WAS a clip for this! Thank you!
BelindaKyle 1 year ago
que duo! a cual mejor!
:-D
KuropinHasan 1 year ago
hey!
jellobefore 1 year ago
top notch upload..ty
user7272 1 year ago
YVW
dean358 1 year ago
Awesome! Great to see a video for one of my all-time favorite songs!
jlmaka 1 year ago
YVW! If you like this I recommend you take a look at some of the other work on my Dean358 channel. All created during the same era -- ah, the 80s :-) Cheers!
dean358 1 year ago
I think I've watched this about 50+ times in the past 2 days. Thanks so much for making/posting this.
Ultrasecond 1 year ago
great lipsynch! love both the song and the vid!! so 80's... :)
GURAKASCA 1 year ago
@GURAKASCA Could you please send me the plug in that increases the YouTube frame rate to see lip sync? (Just kidding!) Hey, it was the 80s! Tnx for watching!
dean358 1 year ago
@dean358 :)) actually i was really impressed by their synch,especially hers.anyway,excellent duo...thnx for the reply!
GURAKASCA 1 year ago
is this a different mix?
LeaveDenbyAlone 1 year ago
so people spend a lot of time looking at pictures and they want to be looked at as well
karenteacher2008 1 year ago
I noticed that the version of the song used here is neither the version on Laurie's album "Mister Heartbreak," nor on Peter's album "So." Did Geffen and Warner Bros. use this as the official clip for both of them? Peace.
MuzikJunkyAES 2 years ago
I don't remember delivering a master to either Geffen or Warner -- just WNET for the broadcast. The again, it's been a lotta miles and much haze since then :-)
dean358 2 years ago
Wow, thanks for the prompt answer, Dean! Peace.
MuzikJunkyAES 2 years ago
@dean358 I found out about this video because someone was talking about the different mixes of the song. That person remembered one mix for "So," one for "Mister Heartbreak," and a third for this video. So if your mind is hazy, at least another person seems to be caught in the same haze.
Thanks for uploading these videos. I always love it when I find people on here who were involved in creating music videos before YouTube existed.
lexmarkblackink 5 months ago
@dean358 I found out about this video because someone was talking about the different mixes of the song. That person remembered one mix for "So," one for "Mister Heartbreak," and a third for this video. So if your mind is hazy, at least another person seems to be caught in the same haze.
Thanks for uploading these videos. I always love it when I find people on here who were involved in creating music videos before YouTube existed.
lexmarkblackink 5 months ago
Sorry ...Just read it was created for satellite "Good Morning Mr. Orwell"
karenteacher2008 2 years ago
Curious as to what you mean by "extreme dependence on images?" As in "images over content?" I wouldn't read all that much into this video -- it's what we were able to create given 48 hours for production and post. Oh, and I think your interpreting it is great :-)
dean358 2 years ago
@dean358 When I wrote the comment I thought about many people who believe looking good equals being good...those people who upload tons of pictures of themselves to social networks like facebook. Then, don't ask me why I was thinking about that LOL
karenteacher2008 1 year ago
I know some will hate me for trying to interpret this...I connect the video with the extreme dependence on images or what is seen that ppl is experiencing nowadays What do u think?
karenteacher2008 2 years ago
I remember waking up early to record this on WNET channel 13. My first exposure to both Peter Gabriel and Laurie Anderson, as well as Philip Glass and John Cage. Trippy times...
mpawliger 2 years ago
Never seen this before. Cool.
standupstella 2 years ago
Amazing video! For more works by Dean Winkler visit the LUX Collection.
luxmovingimage 2 years ago
Jeepers Tante. Cranky?
benovision 2 years ago
good experimental music of the 80s, but partly very goofy visual realisation
tantemanfred 2 years ago
only partly? :-) Hey, we made this in two days (production and post) for Nam June Paik. He loved goofy!
dean358 2 years ago
Sorry? I meant it in the meaning of stiff, unfitting, pointless, not inspiring.
tantemanfred 2 years ago
Oki Dean thank's for explanations.
I had a look on Grass Valley's website to get more informations about analog switchers and i found a pdf introducing "Krystal™ system
architecture" wich seems to be an analog effects processor or somethin...
Well i understood you used an Ampex Digital Optics processor (ADO) instead to compute and simulate real time lighting and shading.
sorry for imprecisions (:>).
Regards.
GoodNewsFromStars 2 years ago
Hi Dean,
Thank's for quality - i have 2 questions please.
1- how did they simulate Laurie and Pete's mechanical motion like it appears at 2:57 ?.
2- which kind of professional software/OS could we use in 1984 to generate so nice Phong's (Gouraud's ??..) illumination ?.
Regards.
GoodNewsFromStars 2 years ago
Laurie and Peter are lying on their backs on a blue screen floor. The camera is positioned above them. The motion isn't simulated - it's the two of them moving.
All lighting and shading were created in real time using Grass Valley 300 analog video switcher. The "spotlight" is a switcher wipe and the "shadow" is their matte signal repositioned and distorted with an ADO, then keyed behind them.
Ah, the good old days....:-)
dean358 2 years ago
Oups..,
I was really thinking about "cast shadowing" in this example (Phong and Gourand are local illumination models applied in image synthesis) - maybe analog processors in mid 80's were computing real time Z-Buffering or ray tracing to get this amazing rendering.
Anyway that's awesome.
GoodNewsFromStars 2 years ago
Anyone know where to get the whole Good Morning Mr. Orwell" show?
trylonperisphere 2 years ago
You can purchase a 38 minute edit of the broadcast from Electronic Arts Intermix in NYC. (eai-dot-org). I've also posted ACT III as a video response above, as Nam June included ACT III in the broadcast. - Dean
dean358 2 years ago
Yes thank you!
adamlake2007 2 years ago
your both very welcome -- enjoy!
dean358 2 years ago
Wow, this is a very good "excellent" quality - thanks for posting this ;-))
SussudioPGFan 2 years ago