Soon as that net comes off the Moorings, whatever happens afterward doesn't count... Geez, not only do they screw up Interference calls (which is too broad of a rule anyway), but they blow this blatant one too.
@x30xSabresFan But, if and when the net is removed from its holders and original position the play is imediatly blown dead even if the puck, "was" going to go in, it must be in.
@djshibbz If the net comes off of the posts, and the shot was already taken, and the puck goes past the goal line, where it would of been "legal" if the net was there, its a Goal.
I remember that because I ref as a job (Canada is where Good payment is btw)
@x30xSabresFan you're on glue, are you a house league official?....A shot is taken from the other end of the ice and then the net is pushed into the corner, according to you, if the puck crosses the goal line where the net would have been it's a goal??? You must be on glue
@whoisstingy If the net is taken off, As the shot was already taken, meaning in mid "flight" and it goes in where it would have with the net in place, Its a goal if the net was taken off accidently.
@djshibbz If the net comes off of the posts, and the shot was already taken, and the puck goes past the goal line, where it would of been "legal" if the net was there, its a Goal.
I remember that because I ref as a job (Canada is where Good payment is btw)
Here is why the goal counted for all you people who really don't know the rules. YES the net came off... we can all see that however he had beat the goaltender any way and shot the puck before the puck cross the goal line. GOOD GOAL!
Wow, at first I was saying to myself "Oh boy, ANOTHER bad call video that thinks it's the worst one." This REALLY is a candidate for one of the worst calls!
regardless of whether the net came off or not, he beat the goalie clean...In the spirit of competition it was a goal and the ref got it right...Just like the Brett Hull goal against the Sabers for the Cup winning goal...I don't care what the rule says or if his toe was in the crease he beat Hasek clean.
Everybody has to stop nagging on the ref! Ok he made a bad call, get over it, does a Goalie get nagged this much if he makes a mistake? And no one takes in the concideration that he/she is at a different angle, maybe he saw the puck go in before the player hit the net?
And its not that refs job to Tell if the puck stoped/went backwards, its the other ref (other side)
@x30xSabresFan Not all mistakes are equal. The mistake the referee made here is NOT like a goalie making a mistake by allowing a goal.
And the angle excuse you came up with is bullshit. Referees are trained and required to watch for these kinds of things. If he's going to explain his mistake by saying he was at a bad angle then he's admitting incompetence, which is just as bad.
Oh and BTW, refs CAN face repercussions for making such blatantly bad calls, sometimes by demotion or even being fired.
@LordDisQo Yes but you do know their are 2 Refferees on the ice right? And they both can over rule each other with evidence? Look where he is, not where you are, at the time of the goal the ref was at a wierd angle, he was BEHIND the player. Now you get down there and tell me its alittle more difficult, have you reffed? And I mean for something with accual speed? Its not easy to get every call right, refs are human so there is human error, And he could be fired, if this WERE Blatantly a bad call
@x30xSabresFan Are you serious? No matter where you stand, you can EASILY notice the net getting knocked off. Furthermore, he is responsible for being in a position to make proper calls. Even if his position was a valid excuse (which it's not), then he made a mistake by standing in the wrong spot to properly observe the play.
And this is the ECHL. They employ only ONE referee for games, not two. Shows how much you know.
EVERYONE knows how bad this call was, except you. Says a lot about you...
@LordDisQo he never saw the net come off. Ive talked to him. He was so focused on the puck to where he didnt notice the net come off and b/c the other 2 linesmen were not in a proper position to see this they couldnt help him and now they actually changed ps procedures to where the back linesmen now stands at center ice instead of between the benches. Everyone makes a mistake. do you think hes happy w/ this. they still made the play offs by 1 point so i dont see why everyone still rips on this.
@oilersman95 But this is not a regular goal, look under penatly shots. I had a situation like this in the game. Shoot out, goalie ACCIDENTLY knocks the net off. I should have awarded a re-shot. The Rule you are commenting on refers during the game. In fact, if you read on in situation 7, it clearly states "...mooring, except under Rule 4.9 (b) - Penalty Shot..." Case and point. The proper procedure is to stop play immediately and order a re-shot. Also read situation 1 for Rule 10.1.
Section 10 of the Hockey Canada Rule Book (most rules here are the same and universal in all leagues of hockey) Rule 10.4 states that "Any goal scored, other than covered in the Official Rules shall not be allowed." Situation 7 of this rule states that "No goal is to be allowed if the goal off it's mooring whether or not the goal was deliberately knocked from its mooring" Correct call: No goal.
@TheRedman206 you guys are so clueless its been a rule since the lockout if the net gets knocked off the mourings and the puck goes in where the goal post would normally be,its still a good goal
@xlxRAPT0Rxlx that was a terribly blown call you are correct that a goal can be awarded but only if the goal is displaced by the defending player, in this case the individual taking the shot is the one who disloged the net and therefore it is a no goal
worst call ever: i scored and it went off the netting on the top inside of the net. everyone stopped playing including the goalie and he called it no goal... i was fuckin chapped
i'm not sure about the net coming off. in my opinion it should not be a goal, but i don't know the rule. however, it should not have been a goal because clearly forward progress stopped.
for all of you guys who think this is no goal, you dont know much about hockey, therefore must be americans... if the net never moved the puck still would have went in and its up to the refs discretion.if there was an empty net chance and the puck was going straight in and a defensemen purposely pushed the net off its pegs ( this situation wouldn't really happen) it would still count. fair goal the net moving didnt effect whether the puck went in or not, this player undressed that goalie anyway.
the ref is allowed to decide. the player clearly beat the goalie and was going to score completely within the rules of a shootout since there is no direct rule against the act of the shooter knocking off the net the ref is allowed to call a good goal for a shooter who had the goalie clearly beat and put it square in the net. the net had nothing to do with whether or not the goalie could make a save yall are retarded.
According to the ECHL rulebook, the attacking player maintained forward progress as outlined in rule 24.2. (not exactly a spin-o-rama, but the same intention). Goals are allowed during play when the net is dislodged by the defender as outlined in rule 63.6. The problem is, the attacker dislodged the net. This exact scenario is not addressed and therefor is implied that this is NOT a goal. Again, rule 63.6 only says its a good goal if the defender dislodges the net.
Depends on the league rules. Some leagues rules state that if the net coming off had no impact on wether it was a goal or not then the goal stands. Others state that as soon as it is off it is dead. Different leagues, different rules. Plus forward momentum WAS kept throughout the play. The only thing I can think of is that this must not be too strong of a league since it looks like they have beer league pegs in the net to keep it from moving.
hey everyone here saying its a good goal you are crazy... if the goalie takes the net out then the ref can decide its a goal if the opuck would ahve continued into the net. in this instance the PLAYER takes out the net, thus no goal
If an attacker knocks the defending net from its moorings without being forced by a defender then play is whistled dead and a goal, if scored, is disallowed. The ref blew the call.
@Aggort You don't get fired for a bad call, Do Goalies get fired if they have a bad game? No
Why should the refs be any different, They call what they see on the Ice, you have a better angle 99% of the time, he might be seeing something different from his angle.
Maybe it looked like the puck was in before the net came off? You don't know
@FlyersBIATCH typical flyer dousche... dont know the rules. lol but u keep thinking your right and dont look up the rule cuz thats just what u tards do lol...
@FlyersBIATCH you obviously dont know shit about hockey if you think thats a clean goal. The player moved the net with his body before he took the shot....Therefore no goal. If the goalie would have moved the net in this case, the goal would have counted.
@James76012 Well I'm not sure about this league but if it's the same as NHL the player can skate backwards so long as the puck continues to travel forward. Looks to me like the puck stopped moving towards the goal line and it should have been disallowed.
It's the wrong call but it's not a huge deal of a wrong call or anything. I had to watch it twice to realize what happened and the ref doesn't have that luxury.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
In a penalty shot, if the goalie moves the net and the attacker does not score, then a reshot is allowed. If, however, the attacker scores, the goal is accepted and noted down. Correct call.
it doesnt matter. if the net was moved incidentally, the ref can decide whether it would have gone in had the net not moved (this would have) and can rule it a good goal. You basically only get it if the net was knocked off in the motion of the shot. The missed non-call here came before the goal. The skater stopped his forward momentum then took the shot.
@SilentStryk07 Rules depend on League and as far as I am aware the moment the opposing player comes into contact with the net it's ruled dead. The player also took the shot on a MOVING net thus not allowing the goalie proper defence. When the ECHL reviewed this they came down on the ref hard.
@SilentStryk07 he didnt stop forward motin though. he spun into a backward skating position in the exact same trejectory never actually coming to a complete stop. so he never stopped and it would have been called a goal all the way. there were no objections
@SilentStryk07 This IS a bad call. At least for NHL standards. I dont know about other leagues rules, but in the NHL, the rule is if the net gets dislodged before the puck goes in, it is no goal PERIOD. It doesnt matter how the net comes off its moorings, but if it does before the puck goes in, no goal.
@SilentStryk07 uuhhhhh, nooo. if the nets off the nets off simple as that and its no goal, it was a great move and he kept forward momentum the whole time.
@SilentStryk07 Hockey Canada Official Rule Book, Rule 10.4 (h):" Any goal scored, other than covered in the Official Rules shall not be allowed." Situation 7 of this rule states that "No goal is to be allowed if the goal off it's mooring whether or not the goal was deliberately knocked from its mooring", Period no discrepancy there.
@buua19 what r u talking about the player is the one that moved the net not the goalie and if the puck was in the net before the net moved then its a goal but the net moved first then the puck was in the net so noo goal
@buua19 No, no, no! Under Hockey Canada rules the instant the net if off you blow the play dead and order a reshot! Rule 4.9 Situation 17. It says that if the net being dislodged is accidental, immediately award a re-shot. UNLESS the puck went into the net OR the shot was complete before the net became dislodged.
@JesseFC101 Not exactly, this deals with the goaltender dislodging the net, if the player does it a different rule applies, Rule 10.4 (h) see my comment above.
No he wasn't and that was the problem. On our local news that night they had a replay from behind the net and the ECHL ruled it as well stating it was the players skate.
he entered into goalkeepers area first with his skates (can u do this in Canada by the roles? ), afterwords he fired that puck by him displaced net which is goal must be disallowed !
It was ruled a goal, and as far as the rest of the season goes as far as I know he wasn't allowed to ref this season either. A big reason why, he had so many people outside wait for him and threaten him he was afraid they were going to hurt him!
After the video the crowd went insane and began throwing items onto the ice! It got ugly!
i remember this game. this is the game where everyone in wesbanco arena stood up on their seats and through something on the ice. curtiss darling went after the ref... directly after the game, greg puhalski(coach) followed the ref into their locker room. intense game!
red line doesnt matter. Only the puck cant go behind the line. the player can. I dont wanna defend the ref, but that goal was going in whether the net was knocked off or not... However, that was pretty bad. If the goalie had knocked the net off, then yes, it's still a goal, but the player did! He should get an extra penalty for ebing so damn stupid when he already had the goal!!
This has been flagged as spam show
nice try but nobody can deke like datsuk. check out granlund's attempt vs sweden. even he can't do it
chillifm 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice try but nobody can deke like datsuk. check out granlund's attempt vs sweden. even he can't do it
chillifm 3 weeks ago
nice try but nobody can deke like datsuk. check out granlund's attempt vs sweden. even he can't do it
chillifm 3 weeks ago
Soon as that net comes off the Moorings, whatever happens afterward doesn't count... Geez, not only do they screw up Interference calls (which is too broad of a rule anyway), but they blow this blatant one too.
Geno2733 1 month ago
i wuz there when it happened...
lilnailer 2 months ago
good call
watchmy4 3 months ago
shit nice goal
oTiPSYoGAMiNG 4 months ago
Ok, just so everyone knows, the puck was going in either way, if the net was off or not, the rule states that.
SHUT UP AND READ
Thanks :)
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan But, if and when the net is removed from its holders and original position the play is imediatly blown dead even if the puck, "was" going to go in, it must be in.
djshibbz 4 months ago
@djshibbz If the net comes off of the posts, and the shot was already taken, and the puck goes past the goal line, where it would of been "legal" if the net was there, its a Goal.
I remember that because I ref as a job (Canada is where Good payment is btw)
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan you're on glue, are you a house league official?....A shot is taken from the other end of the ice and then the net is pushed into the corner, according to you, if the puck crosses the goal line where the net would have been it's a goal??? You must be on glue
whoisstingy 3 months ago
@whoisstingy If the net is taken off, As the shot was already taken, meaning in mid "flight" and it goes in where it would have with the net in place, Its a goal if the net was taken off accidently.
Go read the rules.
Wtf is up with you and glue?
x30xSabresFan 3 months ago
@x30xSabresFan No. The player's right skate nailed the mooring and knocked the net off BEFORE the puck even left the ice.
Geno2733 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djshibbz If the net comes off of the posts, and the shot was already taken, and the puck goes past the goal line, where it would of been "legal" if the net was there, its a Goal.
I remember that because I ref as a job (Canada is where Good payment is btw)
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
Here is why the goal counted for all you people who really don't know the rules. YES the net came off... we can all see that however he had beat the goaltender any way and shot the puck before the puck cross the goal line. GOOD GOAL!
EverybodyFunny666 4 months ago
that was actualy a sick move
NYR1926 4 months ago
@NYR1926 yea dude and go RANGERS lol
XCREATIVEXXTHINGSX 4 months ago
what happened the goal counted?
jeffery2343 4 months ago
and if you don't beleive me look in the ECHL official rulebook on page 103 section 63.6
KThegame007 5 months ago
why is two legged horse in suggestions...
sauceseft 5 months ago 3
that was such a filthy move
p4t4r2 6 months ago 3
it was still a pretty dirty move..
VacouverCanucks 6 months ago 3
Must have been a Russian ref.
Sarando1 6 months ago
there isnt enough advertising on the ice
rockerseven 6 months ago 22
@rockerseven nah in some places there is only a miximum of 1meterx1.5 meters of white ice at a time
JacobVloggs 5 months ago
@rockerseven I agree. Way too much white.
ordealbyfire 4 months ago
Comment removed
Spic173 2 months ago
Comment removed
Spic173 2 months ago
I agree. not enough ads. need more ad rape.
Spic173 2 months ago
Wow, at first I was saying to myself "Oh boy, ANOTHER bad call video that thinks it's the worst one." This REALLY is a candidate for one of the worst calls!
Quillons1 6 months ago 8
!!BRUINS!!
dalvinsalome531 7 months ago
regardless of whether the net came off or not, he beat the goalie clean...In the spirit of competition it was a goal and the ref got it right...Just like the Brett Hull goal against the Sabers for the Cup winning goal...I don't care what the rule says or if his toe was in the crease he beat Hasek clean.
chichigord 7 months ago
i think he got the goal simply because it was an outrageous move.
regardless of whether or not it shouldve counted... it was an awesome deke.
cmac2191 7 months ago
Everybody has to stop nagging on the ref! Ok he made a bad call, get over it, does a Goalie get nagged this much if he makes a mistake? And no one takes in the concideration that he/she is at a different angle, maybe he saw the puck go in before the player hit the net?
And its not that refs job to Tell if the puck stoped/went backwards, its the other ref (other side)
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
@x30xSabresFan Not all mistakes are equal. The mistake the referee made here is NOT like a goalie making a mistake by allowing a goal.
And the angle excuse you came up with is bullshit. Referees are trained and required to watch for these kinds of things. If he's going to explain his mistake by saying he was at a bad angle then he's admitting incompetence, which is just as bad.
Oh and BTW, refs CAN face repercussions for making such blatantly bad calls, sometimes by demotion or even being fired.
LordDisQo 7 months ago
@LordDisQo Yes but you do know their are 2 Refferees on the ice right? And they both can over rule each other with evidence? Look where he is, not where you are, at the time of the goal the ref was at a wierd angle, he was BEHIND the player. Now you get down there and tell me its alittle more difficult, have you reffed? And I mean for something with accual speed? Its not easy to get every call right, refs are human so there is human error, And he could be fired, if this WERE Blatantly a bad call
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
@x30xSabresFan Are you serious? No matter where you stand, you can EASILY notice the net getting knocked off. Furthermore, he is responsible for being in a position to make proper calls. Even if his position was a valid excuse (which it's not), then he made a mistake by standing in the wrong spot to properly observe the play.
And this is the ECHL. They employ only ONE referee for games, not two. Shows how much you know.
EVERYONE knows how bad this call was, except you. Says a lot about you...
LordDisQo 7 months ago
@LordDisQo he never saw the net come off. Ive talked to him. He was so focused on the puck to where he didnt notice the net come off and b/c the other 2 linesmen were not in a proper position to see this they couldnt help him and now they actually changed ps procedures to where the back linesmen now stands at center ice instead of between the benches. Everyone makes a mistake. do you think hes happy w/ this. they still made the play offs by 1 point so i dont see why everyone still rips on this.
BillCronin8 7 months ago 2
@LordDisQo lol demotion
BillCronin8 7 months ago
i don't care about the call, that was a great move lol
derhalofanatic 7 months ago
i'm not a fan of the rule in this case because he wouldve scored if it was moored but it wasnt and the rule is there so it's no goal
destructopoo 7 months ago
lmfaoo
imonaboatland 7 months ago
nice deke
Loljoqnoob 8 months ago
even if the player didn't hit the net, the puck appeared to be brought backwards enough to call it dead. bad call. must have been kelly sutherland.
rthrbcurling 8 months ago
It would have been a sick goal it the net wasn't knocked off
chillifm 8 months ago
@oilersman95 But this is not a regular goal, look under penatly shots. I had a situation like this in the game. Shoot out, goalie ACCIDENTLY knocks the net off. I should have awarded a re-shot. The Rule you are commenting on refers during the game. In fact, if you read on in situation 7, it clearly states "...mooring, except under Rule 4.9 (b) - Penalty Shot..." Case and point. The proper procedure is to stop play immediately and order a re-shot. Also read situation 1 for Rule 10.1.
JesseFC101 8 months ago
I'm going to make a educated comment.
Section 10 of the Hockey Canada Rule Book (most rules here are the same and universal in all leagues of hockey) Rule 10.4 states that "Any goal scored, other than covered in the Official Rules shall not be allowed." Situation 7 of this rule states that "No goal is to be allowed if the goal off it's mooring whether or not the goal was deliberately knocked from its mooring" Correct call: No goal.
- A Hockey Canada/ Alberta Official
oilersman95 8 months ago
that was a nice move by the player. never see it before
Zimba9810 9 months ago
i was at this game bullshit call.. it was about the second time they pushed the net off
TheRedman206 9 months ago
@TheRedman206 you guys are so clueless its been a rule since the lockout if the net gets knocked off the mourings and the puck goes in where the goal post would normally be,its still a good goal
xlxRAPT0Rxlx 7 months ago
@xlxRAPT0Rxlx that was a terribly blown call you are correct that a goal can be awarded but only if the goal is displaced by the defending player, in this case the individual taking the shot is the one who disloged the net and therefore it is a no goal
KThegame007 5 months ago
The net was of for like 3 seconds before he shot. that no goal!
hockey77967 9 months ago
thats a goal!! wtf?
NasreenN101 9 months ago
No matter how the net get moved off, it;s no goal.
jerrytimes 9 months ago
was it also scored inside the crease?
Shaftsus 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that's not a bad call
SectorPlus 10 months ago
you cant score after the net is moved. terrible call. he also slightly interfered with the goalie.
Finalflash50 10 months ago
@Finalflash50 Bad call, but he did not touch the goalie though...
XXDemonXSlayer13XX 8 months ago
@XXDemonXSlayer13XX Yeah re-watching it I noticed that. Bad call.
Finalflash50 8 months ago
lol this is a bad call. player moves the net, and gets the puck in after the net is off. horrible call XD
lilrobtom22 10 months ago
Coz as sey....
JSchwabes 10 months ago
That was so not a goal.
comicozy87 11 months ago
worst call ever: i scored and it went off the netting on the top inside of the net. everyone stopped playing including the goalie and he called it no goal... i was fuckin chapped
HockeySeanX 11 months ago
the skater was also behind the goal line.
Least legal goal ever.
datjew62 11 months ago
i love how some idiots argue over someone else's opinion?
like isnt it an opinion?
i understand the disgussion, but name calling and stupid little things like that are called "trolling"
sometimes, especially in Hockey vids, it just gets out of hand
DRARC61 11 months ago
i'm not sure about the net coming off. in my opinion it should not be a goal, but i don't know the rule. however, it should not have been a goal because clearly forward progress stopped.
crazygoalie39 11 months ago
Goal
K1NGofCRAZY 11 months ago
great move
Metal66671 11 months ago
no goal.. but a hell of a move
pgcougs22 1 year ago
@stevio321 yeah, for sure. retard
gottaluvthembruins87 1 year ago
anyone calling this a goal just straight up knows absolutely nothing about hockey and if you play, do us all a favour and quit now
klnx14 1 year ago
That's a goal! Great call!
stevio321 1 year ago
Who cares if it should have counted or not, that was a sick move.
gally6676 1 year ago
Still a goal
cwellington54 1 year ago
@cwellington54 ur dumb
blue1234owns 1 year ago
for all of you guys who think this is no goal, you dont know much about hockey, therefore must be americans... if the net never moved the puck still would have went in and its up to the refs discretion.if there was an empty net chance and the puck was going straight in and a defensemen purposely pushed the net off its pegs ( this situation wouldn't really happen) it would still count. fair goal the net moving didnt effect whether the puck went in or not, this player undressed that goalie anyway.
IanGuitarhero 1 year ago
yo its his signature move, give him a break...
blue1234owns 1 year ago
What a fucking idiot obvously it's not a goal
shizzlefoo7 1 year ago
god what an awful call. player hit the net before he shot, no goal. enough said
DzDeadly1 1 year ago
thats a goal and a sick one at that!
jako313030 1 year ago
i know you can't stop forward motion so (regardless of the net situation) does that count from a motion perspective??
mrlanguageguy 1 year ago
at 12 seconds puck is on stick and net is off
Canada9990 1 year ago
the ref is allowed to decide. the player clearly beat the goalie and was going to score completely within the rules of a shootout since there is no direct rule against the act of the shooter knocking off the net the ref is allowed to call a good goal for a shooter who had the goalie clearly beat and put it square in the net. the net had nothing to do with whether or not the goalie could make a save yall are retarded.
hockeyyismylife 1 year ago
According to the ECHL rulebook, the attacking player maintained forward progress as outlined in rule 24.2. (not exactly a spin-o-rama, but the same intention). Goals are allowed during play when the net is dislodged by the defender as outlined in rule 63.6. The problem is, the attacker dislodged the net. This exact scenario is not addressed and therefor is implied that this is NOT a goal. Again, rule 63.6 only says its a good goal if the defender dislodges the net.
pulfordt1 1 year ago
If this happened in the NHL, it would be NO GOAL - Net off moorings. As this isn't the NHL, I don't know about this.
PGOLDEN88 1 year ago
this is actually the right call in a way.. i'm not sure to rules in a shootout tho.. so...
walshph33r 1 year ago
Go Nailers :) I got nothin to lose
yojackiesimposterhr 1 year ago
r u an idiot the net was way off b4 he put the puck in
hockeyismygame888 1 year ago
that was a bad call
mattpistell19 1 year ago
Really doubtful if it was in...
AndyB2105 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ahaha this is halarious check out my channel for sweet hockey vids
gianluca1414 1 year ago
Depends on the league rules. Some leagues rules state that if the net coming off had no impact on wether it was a goal or not then the goal stands. Others state that as soon as it is off it is dead. Different leagues, different rules. Plus forward momentum WAS kept throughout the play. The only thing I can think of is that this must not be too strong of a league since it looks like they have beer league pegs in the net to keep it from moving.
fsuapollo39 1 year ago
That would have been a sweet move if he hadnt knocked the net off.
LOL707 1 year ago
Hey REF!!! Are you pregnant? Cuz you just missed 2 PERIODS!!!!!
blacklegionairsoft1 1 year ago
hey everyone here saying its a good goal you are crazy... if the goalie takes the net out then the ref can decide its a goal if the opuck would ahve continued into the net. in this instance the PLAYER takes out the net, thus no goal
ripsh0w 1 year ago
GOAL! It went in before the goal was loose!
RinkRats22 1 year ago
Comment removed
wuteveritakes06 1 year ago
how is this a good goal?
the player moved the net the goalie didnt.
giannitodaro 1 year ago
If an attacker knocks the defending net from its moorings without being forced by a defender then play is whistled dead and a goal, if scored, is disallowed. The ref blew the call.
thisismedgr 1 year ago
WE WANT THE NAILERS IN JOHNSTOWN!!!!!!!!!
Pensfan8726 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's not a bad call you retard.
FlyersBIATCH 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH You people really need to read. The entire damn league reviewed it and the goal was NO GOOD. The ref was all but fired.
Aggort 1 year ago 9
@Aggort you cant fire a ref for making a bad call, if he continually makes bad calls I guess.
ryan13canada 10 months ago
@Aggort it is no goal net was off wayyyyy before in
vFuhMaZ 9 months ago
@Aggort You don't get fired for a bad call, Do Goalies get fired if they have a bad game? No
Why should the refs be any different, They call what they see on the Ice, you have a better angle 99% of the time, he might be seeing something different from his angle.
Maybe it looked like the puck was in before the net came off? You don't know
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
@FlyersBIATCH typical flyer dousche... dont know the rules. lol but u keep thinking your right and dont look up the rule cuz thats just what u tards do lol...
killeensp 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH how isnt it a bad call he knocked the net off before he shot the puck you ass licking cum target
TheRagingClue8 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH Yea it was ... the net was off before the puck was even in the net.
Redwhat19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlyersBIATCH That was a terrible call. The net was off before the puck was even in the net.
Redwhat19 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH The net was off before he shot YOU RETARD... therefore no goal. flyers suck
hockeyhound77 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH you obviously dont know shit about hockey if you think thats a clean goal. The player moved the net with his body before he took the shot....Therefore no goal. If the goalie would have moved the net in this case, the goal would have counted.
skew06 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH this is a bad call learn hockey before u talk bud
canadarock1 1 year ago
@FlyersBIATCH he can't skate back, its a hockey rule
James76012 1 year ago
@James76012 Well I'm not sure about this league but if it's the same as NHL the player can skate backwards so long as the puck continues to travel forward. Looks to me like the puck stopped moving towards the goal line and it should have been disallowed.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
dude.... he was in the crease, AND KNOCKED THE NET OUT OF PLACE WELL BEFORE SHOOTING IT IN THE NET....
sk8terhumes12345 10 months ago
@FlyersBIATCH lol are u blind or u god some shit in ur eyes damn
JeanLucMongrain 10 months ago
@FlyersBIATCH come talk to us after u know the rules of hockey
nelly9910 8 months ago
@FlyersBIATCH dude how can you even call yourself a flyers fan, net comes off play is dead, end of story, net is off before shot is released
OnTheFly0809 7 months ago
@FlyersBIATCH you have no idea about Icehockey rules don't you?
Networxx95 6 months ago
Good call. Good goal.
bishoppx 1 year ago
it's agood call. the net was moved that doesn't matter in this situation. it doesn't impair the goaltender, who was already beat.
SCRJ94 1 year ago
pause at :12 and all questions will be answered
skydome29 1 year ago
I remember this. There was so much trash on the ice after that call. Now they have a ref and a linesman watching the shooters now.
NailerAddict 1 year ago
no fucking goal. the puck reached the net just after the player moved it
gnr87 1 year ago
i was there that night all hell broke loose. defiantly the worst call in hockey history!
inslbjd9 1 year ago
If you look, the player shoots the puck UNDER the goalie, IMO, goal
Jawz4devils 1 year ago
@mr0zip0 the goalie didnt knock the net off. the player hit it it his leg. you need to get ur eyes checked or somtin
kman192 1 year ago
It's the wrong call but it's not a huge deal of a wrong call or anything. I had to watch it twice to realize what happened and the ref doesn't have that luxury.
bzzhuh 2 years ago
that is a bad call, skater moved it not the goalie. Ref u suck, ref u suck, ref u suck!
trojansforever 2 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In a penalty shot, if the goalie moves the net and the attacker does not score, then a reshot is allowed. If, however, the attacker scores, the goal is accepted and noted down. Correct call.
buua19 2 years ago
Problem is the player moved the net, not the goalie.
Aggort 2 years ago 36
@Aggort
it doesnt matter. if the net was moved incidentally, the ref can decide whether it would have gone in had the net not moved (this would have) and can rule it a good goal. You basically only get it if the net was knocked off in the motion of the shot. The missed non-call here came before the goal. The skater stopped his forward momentum then took the shot.
SilentStryk07 1 year ago
@SilentStryk07 Rules depend on League and as far as I am aware the moment the opposing player comes into contact with the net it's ruled dead. The player also took the shot on a MOVING net thus not allowing the goalie proper defence. When the ECHL reviewed this they came down on the ref hard.
Aggort 1 year ago
@Aggort ah that makes sense. i've become too used to the NHL rules.. guess i'll have to make my way to some K-Wings games next year
SilentStryk07 1 year ago
@Aggort what i seen. it also looked like the player was passed the red icing line before he shot the puck.
jbold5 1 year ago
@SilentStryk07 he didnt stop forward motin though. he spun into a backward skating position in the exact same trejectory never actually coming to a complete stop. so he never stopped and it would have been called a goal all the way. there were no objections
AUSTINSWORLD10 1 year ago
@SilentStryk07 This IS a bad call. At least for NHL standards. I dont know about other leagues rules, but in the NHL, the rule is if the net gets dislodged before the puck goes in, it is no goal PERIOD. It doesnt matter how the net comes off its moorings, but if it does before the puck goes in, no goal.
honeasports 1 year ago
@SilentStryk07
You are wrong, according to NHL rules, that only works if the person who does knock the net off is on the team that gave up the goal.
kokoth 1 year ago
@SilentStryk07 uuhhhhh, nooo. if the nets off the nets off simple as that and its no goal, it was a great move and he kept forward momentum the whole time.
ChewZingz 8 months ago
@SilentStryk07 Hockey Canada Official Rule Book, Rule 10.4 (h):" Any goal scored, other than covered in the Official Rules shall not be allowed." Situation 7 of this rule states that "No goal is to be allowed if the goal off it's mooring whether or not the goal was deliberately knocked from its mooring", Period no discrepancy there.
oilersman95 8 months ago
@buua19 problem is we dont play by your imaginary world rules. if the net is moved its just like regular play NO GOAL and NO RESHOT
musicmajor468 1 year ago
@buua19 what r u talking about the player is the one that moved the net not the goalie and if the puck was in the net before the net moved then its a goal but the net moved first then the puck was in the net so noo goal
canadarock1 1 year ago
@buua19 No, no, no! Under Hockey Canada rules the instant the net if off you blow the play dead and order a reshot! Rule 4.9 Situation 17. It says that if the net being dislodged is accidental, immediately award a re-shot. UNLESS the puck went into the net OR the shot was complete before the net became dislodged.
JesseFC101 9 months ago
@JesseFC101 Not exactly, this deals with the goaltender dislodging the net, if the player does it a different rule applies, Rule 10.4 (h) see my comment above.
oilersman95 8 months ago
BS the shooter hit the goal with his leg
Hunterman924 2 years ago
Oh it is very hard to catch, especially at my angle. I was so pissed cus it was my 21st birthday!
Aggort 2 years ago
No he wasn't and that was the problem. On our local news that night they had a replay from behind the net and the ECHL ruled it as well stating it was the players skate.
Aggort 2 years ago
Is that Auger reffing?
Blueshockey2005 2 years ago
that could have been a sick move
yonner490 2 years ago
he entered into goalkeepers area first with his skates (can u do this in Canada by the roles? ), afterwords he fired that puck by him displaced net which is goal must be disallowed !
Vidas666 2 years ago
Holy shit that ref should be fired. OUT OF A CANNON!
thepointblank213 2 years ago 3
Towards the sun.
Eclipton 1 year ago
Comment removed
Th3ch0s3n0n3s 2 years ago
i am a nailers fan that was a bad call it was ruled a goal because ref pointed down at the ice
steelcitycdl 2 years ago
Somebody tell me- was it RULED goal or no goal?
To me it is NOT A GOAL.
noex100 2 years ago
@noex100 it was ruled a goal.
worst call i've seen in a ECHL game.
that ref wasn't allowed to officiate in wheeling for the rest of the season..
tylerstr123 2 years ago
It was ruled a goal, and as far as the rest of the season goes as far as I know he wasn't allowed to ref this season either. A big reason why, he had so many people outside wait for him and threaten him he was afraid they were going to hurt him!
After the video the crowd went insane and began throwing items onto the ice! It got ugly!
Aggort 2 years ago
my question: did the puck go in before the player ran into the net? Nope. Then it's no goal.
JonasHouse09 2 years ago 2
i remember this game. this is the game where everyone in wesbanco arena stood up on their seats and through something on the ice. curtiss darling went after the ref... directly after the game, greg puhalski(coach) followed the ref into their locker room. intense game!
tylerstr123 2 years ago
forward motion all the way, but net was knocked off well before puck went in by SHOOTER! Should not have been allowed.
nymick23 2 years ago 4
usually on videos like this, i would defend the referee. I just can't here.
Th3ch0s3n0n3s 2 years ago 8
lol, goalie got undressed bigtime.
but that was a horrible call, net was off,
& he was behind red line
killinyo 2 years ago 2
red line doesnt matter. Only the puck cant go behind the line. the player can. I dont wanna defend the ref, but that goal was going in whether the net was knocked off or not... However, that was pretty bad. If the goalie had knocked the net off, then yes, it's still a goal, but the player did! He should get an extra penalty for ebing so damn stupid when he already had the goal!!
Assassin4628 2 years ago
Maintained forward motion, but jesus christ, how can you let that go.......
secksi71 2 years ago
either that was a right sick move, or the goalie for the other team just sucks major dick to get undressed that bad....
HarvesterOfDeath07 2 years ago
Comment removed
frynew 2 years ago
Comment removed
zrrtrrorrnrr 2 years ago
Comment removed
frynew 2 years ago
frynew: not even remotely close to how a penalty shot or shootout attempt is called
petergriffin77 2 years ago
what a retarted ref the net was off...he was prabably looking at his boyfriend in the crowd
hockeyismylife111 2 years ago 5
yea thats pretty bad
radiohead8844 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sick goal
eforerTV 2 years ago
LOL that ref is out of his mind.
What3verz 2 years ago 4
clearly he knocked the net off before scoreing, although he coulda score without knocking off the net :P
crw2893 2 years ago 4
You think that's bad? Take a look at when the ducks played the Red Wings. That was a playoff series. THAT was a bad call (as was this one).
macattack82991 2 years ago 4
lol your fucking blind thats a no goal lol
CallOfDutyMasterz09 2 years ago 13
lol no goal
Maximum40 2 years ago 11
Comment removed
antfournier 2 years ago