Added: 4 years ago
From: ZeroScam
Views: 246,361
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (89)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Qu1 watev ur name is u can take uar fugly ass and shuvv a fukin space shuttle in it asshole I really hope u burn in fukin he'll for wat u said isreal the best for Jews k so u should stop being a fukin racist asss moron and get a fukin life 10 year old

  • How do I block a prick like ZeroScam from my search results?

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • You dickles peice of shit. YOu got beat up bad in elemetary school eh? but your were too much of pussy do anything about it. So now u go on youtube and try to pick on people and piss people off to make u feel like a man cuz you know in your heart u wouldnt say a fuckng thing to anyone in person. Coward asshole donkey buttlicker

  • so you use to go to school with him

  • which explosion?

  • he uploaded the comment before he even watched because he thinks he's funny saying that they died and it was hilarious

  • nice cheescake youve been on about every channel and posted this on every vid about the columbian explosion you should be torure by a cat scrathing your guts out

  • Yeah, it would have been even better if brainless people like you had been on this flight instead of the real crew.

  • lol amuda if u ever see this msg, and for whoever does to be amuzed, NAAAARF ZOIIINK...-_- tsk tsk someones aging backwards dear Benjamin.

  • the commander of this mission is my cousin Tom Hendricks......was privelaged enough to watch this live when i was about 12 years old, seen the landing and all of toms launches aswell...

  • What a disrespectful FAG!!!

  • Uhh, yeah. But do any of you guys realise that this one did NOT end in failure? Columbia did do a great many successful missions you know.

  • cunt

  • Bwahaha!!

    XDDDD!!

    I AM THE CHAMPION!!!! =P

  • lol u guys are more kiddies than me

  • XDDDD

    Beat that

  • :D Lol, thank you. =]

  • This mission they returned, but on Columbia's last mission it disinegrated re-entering our atmoshpere.

    They send one shuttle up into space more than once. That's how they made it cheaper, but creating recycable shuttles.

  • Bah, do as i Star trek, beat all the problems on earht before we move out into space

  • R.I.P.

  • oh god what is this.- when happended i dont know.- where is god in this moment

  • Go to hell, ya racist

  • omg,how could ya say that...we are all humanbeings for christsake man...

  • 2/1/03 ? There's your problem...

    It was supposed to be 2130

  • do all things that go into space blow up?

  • Eventually, yep.

  • That's not true!! Space is a wonderful and mysterious void, and we are only just learning how to explore it. The Challenger Orbiter was actually on-going it's 10th mission before is was tradgically destroyed. Look at Hubble right now, they're gonna retire the space craft, because their technology out grew it. Not because it blew up! Nothing blows up, it's just we're new to this, we don't know when enough is enough. NASA learns from their mistakes. Have some faith.

  • I am all for space travel, though personally I find that the Shuttle program is rapidly deteriorating. They are very outdated pieces of technology now days. Bits and pieces are falling off all the time now. Have you ever seen a real space shuttle? I saw one of the retired Russian "Buran" shuttles on display, there's really not much to them, it's more or less a glider. I'll be sad when the Shuttle program ends because its an end of an era, but it will be interesting to see what comes next.

  • You say personally that the program is deteriorating, but they have actually scheduled retirement of the shuttles in 2010.  I don't know if you knew that or not, sorry if you did.

    Next is the Constellation program, they're making manned rockets to return to the moon and put permanent bases there. Then on to Mars using the same rocket. :)

  • Hi andy, I did know that. I just feel that they're really milking the shuttles for all they're worth. But I guess that is okay, you'd want to considering how much they must cost! Hehe. The Contellation program sounds pretty cool. Imagine living on Mars of the Moon. I think I'd go insane missing all my family and friends!

  • what are you talking about, chuckling away about usin de ol' shuttle to t'end cozza de cost, ho ho ho it was utterly corrupt decision making around costs that led to challenger detonating all over the global stage. Christ I'd shit bricks if some folksy berk like you were in charge, accomplice to some snow-pisshole-eyed corporate accountant running the rig and sending us either into space or into the ocean in flames.

  • Comment removed

  • takes seconds for a message to come from the moon, so from orbit, the delay is almost not there.

  • Comment removed

  • you're not right in the head dude

  • i think your head is up on mars

  • Comment removed

  • mac people like you annoy me more then the people you are complaining about. STFU. messaging on a blog or website can be done just fine with text words or abbreviations etc. if you dont like it dont read it and stop complaining about it you little whiner.

  • Comment removed

  • u'd think that after 331 posted videos this guy would know better...

  • This is video so fantastically farking stupid!!!

  • This Video isnt the columbia its a shuttle that actually made its landing this isnt columbia

  • wtf IT IS columbia on a sts-78 mission in 1996...

    it disingrated 7 years later on its 28th mission (sts-107).

  • it was not about being smart or dedicated, it was about you being a dumbass (you being so confident).. u can google it (it takes 2clicks and 10sec btw) to find out that columbia flew more than once, if you really DONT want to spam?! i just pasted dates to verify, nothing scientific and nothing personal ment tho.. if it was to you - sorry!

  • no reard this is columbia the space shuttle crashed on 2/1/03 tard

  • This film doesn't say 'Columbia's last flight' does it? No. It is Columbia, it's just not the particular mission where all teh bolts fell out and its face fell off before condemning the crew to death by atmospheric burn-up. Might as well die in a frying pan. Takes as long.

  • At the temperatures during reentry, one would not even have time to register pain, as your nerves, along with the rest of you, would incinerate before any signal could reach your brain. They probably knew something was up, but never saw their deaths coming.

  • Care to quote your source on that? I haven't found any information that supports your claim.

    Logically speaking, they would have lost consciousness just due to the depressurization of the craft. Also, most people pass out when they experience extreme pain or injury. The idea that they could stay conscious for a full hour under those conditions seems rather far-fetched.

  • So you can't find the source so you disregard it? This is your approach to everything, is it, you inhabit some peculiar cellar of total disbelief?

  • LOL!

    So I suppose I should believe anything that someone tells me? Perhaps I should take Bin Ladin at his word about the U.S.? PLEASE! If there is a claim that something is contrary to how I understand it, I expect to find credible evidence supporting it.

  • you shoudl believe bush about iraq's wmd

    lol

    and they all cooked like babies in a microwave

    you're in denial

  • u are wrong. the shuttle on the bottom is coveed in a glass tht can stand higher temperature of heat ever. and on top they have solar reflecters to block out the heat also the same tiles to protect hem. so thye didnt fry. they died from inside out i think. the inside of the shuttle blew uopa nad then they exploded. or its they landed in the water and died. i cant quiet remember. But i went to NASA and learned all of wat i told u. it was a field trip look it up.

  • I went to the place. not the website.

  • It sounds like you're remembering the Challenger disaster, not the Columbia disaster. With the Challenger disaster, they found the cockpit intact and were able to recover all the bodies. After the recovery, it was found that two of the emergency oxygen supplies had been activated, which meant that at least two of the astronauts were still conscious after the fuel tank exploded. However, they were unable to survive the g-forces related to the impact with the water.

  • SOrry about that. I dont have the greatest memory. BUt every shuttle is covered with the tile to protect from heat. also im only 13. im just suprised u know so much. do u work there or somethign. i want to . i just know what i know and u know much more. im still learning and ur very intellegent

  • ok, my mistake! but calm down a bit!! I's just that I happen to have a life outside "spaceshuttles" . How am I supposed to know that this wasn't the last journey? No one told me!!!!!! Plase don't get me wrong again.. O_o

  • IceAngle, maybe you should have just thought for a moment before writing your original comment.

    Still, at least you didn't write any crazy bullshit like robinoi.

  • Alright!!! I said it WAS my mistake!! Wow, you really do care about miniproblems. O_o

  • Ice Girl is correct, the space shuttle columbia was destroyed during re-entry on February 1, 2003 and all seven astronauts on board perished, but this craft did several missions where it orbited and re-entered Earth's atmosphere.

  • that's NOT Columbia!! It didn't even land!!

  • Columbia was the first shuttle to be used by NASA, and had made numerous missions over it's 20+ years of service.

  • r u part of NASA or KSC. no?/ i go there alot cause i live near htem. i learned alot

  • ahhh im jealous. i wish i knew tht much. did u loook it up or something. cause i try to go from what i was taught on the field trips i go on to NASA

  • ?????

  • R.I.P.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more