Most people consider Apple to have stolen it. They didn't. The Mac OS was Unix-based, the GUI was changed, and there were completely different software and hardware for the Macintosh. Microsoft didn't copy from Apple either. Microsoft was NOT Unix-based, had different programs, a different GUI, and different hardware.
Right. Apple wrote their own kernel up until OS X. From what I've read, MS looked more to X/Windows (used on Unix) to model its GUI, though there's no doubt the work at PARC influenced Windows. MS sold its own version of Unix for a time, called Xenix. Charles Simonyi left PARC to work at MS. So he might've brought that knowledge with him, though he's mostly credited for bringing knowledge developed from Bravo (developed at PARC) to Microsoft Word.
lol@erischaot ur so right man... all we got was a prettier GUI and less software.
The good thing about the more ram in computers would be for video/audio editing or engeniering video audio or what ever.
Besides that... i don't get it.
Just shiny GUIS and same shit we've had for years nothing new or revolutionary just memory hogs. I like the new looks just hate the fact its like using XP if it was see through. Not really a new OS change going from XP to Vista just cooler graphics.
This is so amazing. What more do I have today? This ran on a 1 MHz(?) computer with some Kilobytes of RAM and that was it?! From my Gigabytes and Gigahertz PC today I'd expect so much more and it's not there :-( Makes me think...
i was searching allover google to find a way to make the desktop display in thumbnail size they should bring that back. it is much more user friendly
it makes it easier to know what might be in the folder before you go to it. thumbs all the way up!!! heh thumbs
ClutchCoin 4 months ago in playlist The history of computing and the graphical user interface.
Most people consider Apple to have stolen it. They didn't. The Mac OS was Unix-based, the GUI was changed, and there were completely different software and hardware for the Macintosh. Microsoft didn't copy from Apple either. Microsoft was NOT Unix-based, had different programs, a different GUI, and different hardware.
jebug29 1 year ago
@jebug29 The Mac OS was *not* Unix-based (until Mac OS X).
bigkif 1 year ago 2
@jebug29 oh. well, like i said i don't believe anyone stole ideas from anyone :3 and also the Xerox needed games! XD
jebug29 1 year ago
@jebug29
Right. Apple wrote their own kernel up until OS X. From what I've read, MS looked more to X/Windows (used on Unix) to model its GUI, though there's no doubt the work at PARC influenced Windows. MS sold its own version of Unix for a time, called Xenix. Charles Simonyi left PARC to work at MS. So he might've brought that knowledge with him, though he's mostly credited for bringing knowledge developed from Bravo (developed at PARC) to Microsoft Word.
mmille10 10 months ago
@mmille10 Wow, I didn't even know that XD But thanks for telling me :3
jebug29 10 months ago
Where are all the games? lol
jebug29 1 year ago
Uh.. the movie says "© 1982", not 1985..
njetblaj 1 year ago 2
lol@erischaot ur so right man... all we got was a prettier GUI and less software.
The good thing about the more ram in computers would be for video/audio editing or engeniering video audio or what ever.
Besides that... i don't get it.
Just shiny GUIS and same shit we've had for years nothing new or revolutionary just memory hogs. I like the new looks just hate the fact its like using XP if it was see through. Not really a new OS change going from XP to Vista just cooler graphics.
True2TheBlueYoViGang 2 years ago
This is so amazing. What more do I have today? This ran on a 1 MHz(?) computer with some Kilobytes of RAM and that was it?! From my Gigabytes and Gigahertz PC today I'd expect so much more and it's not there :-( Makes me think...
erischaot 3 years ago 8
Metaphor for stretching hasn't changed much :). Nevertheless then, they had only 1MHz.
xchmelmilos 3 years ago 3
@xchmelmilos the Apple I was the same!
aaroninclub 1 year ago