Added: 5 years ago
From: Squirt37
Views: 25,280
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (260)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What d'ya want Geraldo Riviera?

  • The prosecution took it as open and shut and didn't put the hours into it they should have. This case only personally affects the loved ones of the victims. But it is scary in that the case showed how racially divided we still are. The evidence was overwhelming and the conspiracy no more credible than the Moon landing being faked yet they just had to play the race card and people genuinely believed it. He's right. It wasn't about race until the defense made it about that.

  • @TheBronzeSkull Interesting that OJ has since come out with his "What IF I had done it?" book that was really his confession. I genuinely wonder if crazy things like that book and the armed robbery that he's done since then are because, deep down, the guilt does eat at him and he wanted to confess and be punished.

  • Vince is a bad ass!

  • The bitch is back in a Nevada prison for at least 15 more years. He may die there.

  • Than you for posting this, Squirt37.

  • i'm so angry Geraldo, that i could eat nails, awesome

  • Don't eat nails burgar-man--eat a dick..you chump---Cochran would have ran your tail out of L.A. Grand standing limp-dick...

  • @bigjbzzl Please, not only is Bugliosi another level as a lawyer he is another level human being. Saying Cochran in the same breath as a legal mind like Bugliosi is a joke in itself. Any black lawyer with this case could have won. The jury was dying to finally win one and this was a perfect storm. I hope the LA Police learned that when a officer ask to get out you remove him. I also hope the next time a murderer threatens suicide we allow him to save the taxpayers some cash and off himself.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @patsy3700 Actually what OJ taught us that day was more about black people than our justice system. It proved that many of that race still hold an anger that makes it easy for them to back each other even when they are not in the right. It actually showed that blacks are now just have most whites have been from the beginning. More trusting of lies from our own than the truth from someone elses. It is sad really. It was a look at humanity and I didn't like what I seen. But he killed two people..

  • Bugliosi---is a complete coward. He had plenty of opportunity to challenge Mr. Cochran after the case by many media outlets...Johhnie wold have whooped yo' fonky--white ass...chump. Your career was on the ropes then--you can't get a book sold to save your life--years later you are still a loser....lol...

  • @bigjbzzl cochran was a douche and a scumbag. he didn't win the case, the prosecution lost it. his most famous case up until the oj trial was michael jackson in which they paid the kid millions of dollars to drop the charges.

  • @nogoodbastid --what r u freagin' 8yrs old?-----Cochran a scumbag...wow.....if that would have been some white attorney---you would probably say he was a statemen, and masterful at his craft. Others are in love with bugar-boy--when he hasn't tried a case in a decade, from this appearance. Cochran was a professional at all times. Just because you have an issue with the verdict for O.J.(which was spot on)..doesn't mean Cochran was not a professional. He was hired by a defendant to clear his name.

  • @bigjbzzl it was shapiro that went out and got all those experts like lee and baden. all cochran did was show up and inject race into it. which is what he always did. he even played the race card about michael jackson. if the evidence proves your client is guilty, just say that everyone else is racist! oj admits that he was dripping blood from his hand at the time the murders were commited, yet can't explain why, and cochran claims the blood was planted. he already admitted he was bleeding!

  • @nogoodbastid --You are a sad being. If u need to believe that garbage u wrote, to make u feel better. Who am I to deny u ur fantasy. that nicole is a special-girl. making phone calls to her mother after she was long dead, at the hands of some shady mob figure friends of her sister Denise Brown. theres ur real story. but u will always hold the 'brotha' in contempt. So be it-tired of listening to so many jail-house lawyers here.

  • @bigjbzzl so how did oj's blood end up all over the place, and if the police somehow decided to plant it there, why did he admit to them that he had been dripping blood and couldn't explain how? why did the killer happen to have the exact same size of his incredibly uncommon shoes and why did he lie about having never worn them? why did he say if he killed nicole "it was obviously because i loved her so much"?

  • @nogoodbastid --we could go back n forth about the 'evidence' for ever, but I am sure you will not be open to anything I write so I won't debate that with you. if you ever worked in forensics, or watched some of the thousands of t.v. shows spawned by the OJ trail. You would know that during the evidence collection and storage, the finger-nail clippings of ron & nicole went missing. That evidence alone could have sealed the fate of the killer with out question.

  • I was fortunate enough to have taken some classes in policing, powers to arrest, administration of justice etc..etc..During the homicide investigation portion of the class, the former police officers who taught the class, made sure that we students understood that many cases where closed quickly when they where able to establish that a person came into contact with their assailent through the fingernail clippings...high conviction rate...fyi--meathead!!!

  • @bigjbzzl so his blood was at the scene, their blood was in his car and home, he has several provable lies as alibis, and you're worried about fingernails?

  • @nogoodbastid --if you don't know--you don't know...

  • @bigjbzzl oh yeah and if Nicole had the skin of her kids or even Ron under her nails it would have proven to be one of the kids or Ron in a murder suicide... lol You just keep deflecting. Why don't you explain to us why OJ lied to the limo driver that night? Why don't you explain how it worked out the blood trail was to the left, right glove was at OJ's, left glove at Nicole's. Why OJ admitted to bleeding? Why OJ said something like I am the only one that should get hurt? You cant..

  • @nogoodbastid Your right and on top of that Johnny calls witnesses from the flight to Chicago to testify that OJ was not injured even though OJ admitted to it in his interview. What a terrible job the prosecution did in this case. Even with all of their mistakes OJ was obviously guilty and the defense benefitted from a jury from LA that was just looking to let him off so they could avoid riots and what not.

  • @nogoodbastid JOhnny even called witnesses from the airport to testify he wasnt bleeding or injured despite OJ admitting it to police. He was not looking for truth was he? He was being deceptive. Sad that this jury had no understanding of dna. Had they realized that just one drop of blood at the scene and a injury to OJ that he could not explain was admission of guilt. All the other stuff,shoe prints,gloves,hat,hair,fiber.. just icing on the cake.

  • @bigjbzzl A professional? He called witnesses to testify to things he knew was not true. That is not a honest attorney nor a attorney doing a good job. He got lucky that the prosecution was so bad. A solid prosecution would have eaten him alive.

    How about stating in opening that Columban drug lords did it? Once again with no actual evidence to prove it. Just throw it out there. How about them bringing in a new fifth bag... and leaving the tag on it to try to fool the jury? Great man!

  • @mjmitch33 -I know it's hard for you to factor in some other things because of your blind hate for O.J.---but in the beginning of the trail Denise Brown's boyfriend a known mob figure, with pending rackeetering charges from the federal government, was comforting Denise by coming to the trail--he was 'instructed' by the fed's to not appear at the trail, and told to go back to New Jersey...This is documented, but again certain things where left out of this trail that really had their place.

  • @bigjbzzl YOu can try and raise suspicion of every known felon in the country, you can deflect and point elsewhere all you want. The facts in this case are so strong and the reactions of OJ are so obvious that would be the only way a retard could be swayed. OJ is guilty just as sure as the whole group was totally f'd up. But OJ acted alone and killed two innocent people. The evidence told you,his reactions told you and even the way they tried to defend him told you. Wake up, it is that simple.

  • @bigjbzzl This is documented... Yeah ok. Ron was a confidential informant. Faye was selling cocaine and Denise was a Soprano. And it is all documented. You sir are laughable. None of the facts in this case are changed. OJ was cut and bleeding the night a woman he had threatened to kill several times. His blood trail was at the scene, shoe prints,gloves and his guilty reactions tell the entire story. Some are just so worried about having to admit his guilt they will build anything up to avoidit

  • @bigjbzzl Can you forward me those documents? Being a insider in this I bet you know his name and how his charges came off? lol Continue to deflect..only evidence of guilt is against the man that beat her for years including having 9 separate issues where the cops were called. So much evidence. To prove how racist I am look up my facebook and see that my history is a grew up with mostly minorities of all kind, most of my closest friends are of other ethnicities. I am not racist, just a realist

  • @mjmitch33 -I wish this case 'where' as cut & dry as u propose...But there is no such thing as a simple double murder case in any part of society, with all that b/s surrounding it. We truly see things from a different perspective based on life experiences. So even though you have a plethora of minority friendship, the real experience is something to behold. not using that as excuse--just reason we won't see i2i..peace...

  • @bigjbzzl When you think up a way for OJ's blood and the science behind it to be at the murder scene and his injuries that he admitted to to have happened without him being involved in the attack you let me know. Until then this case was and is as cut and dry as that. Do not throw me the "real experience" crap. I know people are capable of heinous acts against each other especially when race is involved. However the only evidence in this case shows OJ left the scene injured and lied to cover

  • @bigjbzzl up his trail from the very first person he came in contact with. You can throw all the Furhman evidence out the window "even though most of it was testified to by others that seen the same thing" and OJ still left enough evidence to convict. It was a perfect storm in LA with the people being mad at police and a jury scared to death to be part of more riots. All that lead to a not guilty verdict. OJ told you he killed them with his own words but you just refuse to listen.

  • @mjmitch33 OJ DIDN'T DO IT....LET IT GO....

  • @bigjbzzl Guilty as sin, black or white... that nigger killed two by himself that night. All the evidence tells us and his words seal the deal. His attorneys died also they should have been real. You can point at the white man and yell frame up all day but your buddy will burn in hell after his 33 year stay.

    lol I tried to rap it on your terms... hope you could keep up! lol

  • @mjmitch33 I told you you are a angry little man. OJ is a national hero pre & post trial. Bugar man is just a tv troll as you are a tube troll looking for some pay back--because you spent the greater portion of highschool getting pushed into your locker, by way of a weggie...

  • @bigjbzzl lol you are picturing me just the opposite as I am. I am a big guy, played three sports in high school have more friends OJ's color than I do my own. Married interracially have MILANO kids and still know the police are not smart enough to plant the evidence so brilliantly to only find OJ's blood. lol You can keep throwing out the stereotypes but I am not whiter than you,smaller than you or more racist than you.. just SMARTER than you!

  • @mjmitch33 There is actual video footage of him going into court with Denise(bet you haven't seen that--or just ignored it). again the Mezzaluna was no quaint little restaurant in the polite neighborhood of Brentwood, it was a place where some shady things went down. you won't believe this-but it's cool, I do. Remember right after the trail denise aked O.J.(through his lawyer) for $5K, to cover some old debts(?)--this was reported in the news(even by Heraldo), but story quickly went away.

  • @bigjbzzl Who going into court with Denise? What court? Are you saying OJ went into court with OJ?

  • @bigjbzzl LOL read Outrage like the rest of the world that made it a BEST SELLER> lol He would have pointed out every lie Johnny was part of and believe me there were many. Johnny claiming different theories, discrediting evidence in several ways and then calling witnesses to argue it another. Vincent is a true legal mind where as JOhnny was just lucky enough to run into a cop with a past and a jury looking to get even. No matter what the outcome Vince lives.. Johnny well not so much.

  • @mjmitch33 your comments are the laughable thing here. You are mixing up fact for innuendo. fact the most telling evidence is not present..the fingernail clippings, they where on the victims when they left Bundy Dr. The blood evidence was so tainted & tampered with you couldn't tell who was lying O.J. or the prosecution. Fruhman was too easy..yet his police work was questionable at a minimum. Ron dropping off glasses in the middle of the night is pure b/s. thers more.

  • @bigjbzzl Blood does not change identity no matter how dirty, fingernail clippings may have or may have not proven anything just like the stomach contents. However we know OJ was there since he bled leaving,in his Bronco, to his house and admitted to it. Again you enter evidence that is unknown, Ron had a motive to dropping the glasses? A drug deal? lol Mafia.. Hitmen... where you think this shit up in Disneyworld?

    Wake up your boy was a desperate old man irate that all his women went white!

  • @mjmitch33 -If O.J. was the killer, the overzealous race-hatred of many of those who had 'hands' on this case blew it. Don't blame the jury. If you bring bullshit to a case you get a bullshit verdict. i heard one of O.J.'s white friends say--there is no money in saying he supports his friend O.J. so he said what they wanted me to say in the book IF i DID IT.(With O.J.'s blessing--amagine that.

  • @bigjbzzl Your right there were overzealous. They should have ignored OJ's blood and questioned Jason who was at work and with his girlfriend. And they should have checked Mexico for the mafia that no one ever mentioned in the case accept for Johnny. They should have questioned the dog, ignored what OJ said and did whatever they could do to let OJ off again. Since they had already ignored his abuse 8 out of 9 times in the past. They were so racist they let him off regularly. Wake the fuck up

  • @mjmitch33 -again O.J. said he cut his finger in the hotel in Chicago or where ever he was... makes sense. to me. All that slashing and cutting , with Ron putting up the good fight to the death, and all O.J. got was a small cut on his finger..remember the photos the police demanded of O.J. as soon as he got to the police station? they took pictures of him in his underware to show that he had no brusing on his body or scratches to indicate a fight. those are facts..not your assumption of...

  • @bigjbzzl A good fight? How do we know it was a good fight? All of his wounds were on his hands and torso. Bruising does not happen instantly, I would argue that if OJ were looked at 48 to 72 hours later you would have had a better chance of seeing bruises if there were any but lets not forget there was not only one cut there was one major cut and several abrasions. However if he cut himself in Chicago why did he admit to bleeding that night at his house?

  • @bigjbzzl Just a coincidence that the left glove fell off, the left finger was cut, the blood trail was on the left and the right glove stayed on all the way to his home where sounds were heard, the brother was seen and a glove was found. Just more coincidence. I got a bridge for you my brotha! A nice bridge!

  • @mjmitch33 --...what your assumption of what O.J. ment by his comments while under-durress. I took at it as Im scared as hell I never thought these drug dealing mafia mofo's would really come after Nicole like that. bugliosi as a professional lawyer shoudl never speak out against another lawyer as if to say he was not a real lawyer and that he would have kicked his tail..rubbish, but he knows what white people want to hear--thus book sales will be at an all time high..Hope you bought his latest.

  • @bigjbzzl give me a break, this case was proven beyond all doubt

  • @bigjbzzl Why should a lawyer who sees another working with no moral compass and beyond the scope of what he is suppose to bring to the case. Lawyers are not there to enter evidence they are there to communicate what the witnesses testify to. Johnny was way out of line in many ways in this case.

    lol drug dealing mafia guys? You are a fucking retarded piece of shit. You don't believe that shit either but because you cannot deal with his obvious guilt you deflect. Your ignorance is bliss!

  • @bigjbzzl Shows you what you know. Johnny was asked to do a debate on Larry King and he turned down the chance so Bugliosi had to debate one of the other guys and he handled him well. Johnny was dishonest and led witnesses to testify to things he knew not to be true. As a officer of the court you are held to a certain level of honesty that Johnny was incapable of playing on. Johnny benefitted from a hostile atmosphere and a racial climate. That is all his lawyer skills were not the reason.

  • @mjmitch33 --While you & bugar-losi, pontificate about your demented vision of who is a professional & who is not. Know this, your racism shines right on through all your words. Oh! so the brother is any less of a laywer because he's black? 'm sure Mr. Cochran took the bar exam like any other laywer would have to do, no affirmitive action or short cuts, just being a good student. The media enhanced the racial enviorment only to ward any other brothers from 'messin wit dem white girls'

  • @bigjbzzl You know nothing about my racial feelings. I grew up in a all black neighborhood,my favorite sport is basketball,my wife is bi racial,my kids have other ethnicities than mine,most of my closest friend are either black or hispanic. My thoughts on Johnny are very simple as are my feelings for OJ. They both avoid the truth and point blame at innocent people in order to benefit themselves. If you are educated enough to understand how dna works you know this case was easy decision.

  • @bigjbzzl My thoughts on Johnny has and always will be the same. He called witnesses to testify to things he knew was not true. He had the gall to compare a cop that talked to a lady about a book and acted like a bad ass to a person named Hitler... He used sexist remarks toward Marcia Clark in the courtroom and he acted like a two year old when his client was found innocent despite knowing he was guilty. He was willing to trash anyone in the case to get his client off. Even the victims.

  • The jury was a bunch of racist morons that wouldn't have convicted their "brother" even if Clarke had shown them a video of Simpson killing his wife.

    They should require a minimum IQ for jurors. If you added up the IQ of the Simpson jury, the total for all 12 would be somewhere around 35!

  • @rasputin1357

    If he came against Johnny with this dumb shit he's talking here, Johnny The Great would tear his has been ass to pieces, Bubba!

  • Johnny Cochran would have embarrassed this Has Been POS!!!

    Johnny Cochran is one of the greatest lawyers of all time!

  • @TheBlacsheep BWAH HAHA HA HAHA!!! Cochran couldn't wipe Bugliosi's butt, let alone stand up to him in court. Cochran was a loser just like you!

  • @TheBlacsheep no, johnny cochran defended rich black people by claiming the other side was racist. nothing more. he couldn't bring with actual facts in the case. he simply denied the truth and acted like any evidence of guilt was just placed there by the prosecution because his client is black. he was pathetic and people like him set people of all colors back and damage justice in this country.

  • @nogoodbastid: "he (Cochran) was pathetic and people like him set people of all colors back and damage justice in this country."

    _____

    It's hilarious how the White perception of "justice in this country" suddenly mirrors ours!

    ....Although only briefly, because I'm sure their small taste of the reality of "justice in this country" will lead to more Blacks being victimized by this same "justice" system that so enrage them now, without an ounce of outrage from Bugliosi or their kind.

  • I love it when racist say "I don't have a racist bone in my body". Because the simple fact that they feel compelled to make such a statement says that even they themselves feel it necessary to mention as an explanation for their comments that seem so much so, and somehow hope that by throwing that out there it will cancel-out the obvious!

    ....so I guess that settles it, Bugliosi says he's not a racist! Hey Bug, by your standard I guess no one is huh?....you POS racist!!!

  • This dumb ass is talking about "tricks" not facts... I'm SO GLAD he wasn't on the case... this trial would have been even MORE of a circus...

  • "For years, blacks have called me 'bad' - meaning 'good'"

  • Guys name is fuhrman...jewish cia.

  • If one were to ask the bug man who is, was, or ever will be the best lawyer of god's grand creation, the bug man would definitely vote for himself. He is confident which is definitely a positive and can't fault him for that. But he also gives the impression that he is invincible, and that is just arrogance. 

  • @cigs1000 105 out of 106 trials

  • @Obelisk2290 Are u saying this guy won 105 out of 106 trials?? That kinda sound unrealistic!

  • @1THETRUTH10 check the record proof is the bottom line

  • Mark furhman figured nicole simpson was trash for being with a black man and was getting what she deserved. That's why he didn't arrest OJ on the new years incident when he beat the hell out of Nicole. Him not arresting OJ in the 80's is not a testament to his not being a racist, in fact, it could be interpreted as quite the contrary.

  • @0oAndAnotherOneo0 then why would he "frame" oj later for a crime against the same woman? if he was so anti-oj that he would risk his own life to frame him, why not arrest him for a crime which requires no tampering?

  • I've said nothing about the '94 murders. I was pointing out a fallacy in Bugliosi's thinking. He believes that Fuhrman not arresting OJ in '89 is indicative of his not being a racist (2:39) , but to me that can be taken as Fuhrman not caring about Nicole's safety since she was married to a black athlete. If you take into consideration how Fuhrman felt about black people at that time, it's not far fetched to believe he wouldnt give a damn about a white woman beig beaten up by her black husband.

  • @0oAndAnotherOneo0 ok so according to you him NOT arresting a black man shows how racist he is. what does that have to do with him collecting evidence against OJ 5 years later?

  • Affirmative action prosecutorial team. That's wrong. 2 wrongs do not make

    a right.

  • I went back and read the blood testimony. There was no EDTA found in the bronco. I would like to give you a chance to use testimony to prove me wrong. Not just trace of some of the chemicals but actual reference sample levels of EDTA in any of the blood. Challenge is there... can you meet the challenge>

  • u r a god-damn lie----gtfoh---edta is a lab produced chemical for preservation of blood. human blood can produce similar 'by-product' but this 'evidence' was tested to be chemical---see defense closing, and prosecution closing arguments..one talked about it the other didn't. You would think the prosecution would bring it but they didn't use it to close.

  • @bijbel Bullshit tests weren't available at that time to differentiate between the two. Quit lying!!! Another example of Simpson's luck!

  • @starsfound --I knew you would come back with that wack--b/s---You are as lame as the words you wrote...They where part of F. Lee Bailey's evidence he used during the questioning phase of some members of the LAPD Coronar/Evidence collection team. You are not a liar just uninformed and stupid...I forgive you.

  • @bigjbzzl What you forget is the ingredients in EDTA are in millions of chemicals. That was testified to. What was also testified to was the fact that the EDTA subsets that were in the two samples in question were at such a low level 1000th of the level that preserved blood would contain. Keep in mind, if just one sample of OJ's blood was found it is evidence of guilt. He has no explanation for any blood being there so just one non EDTA sample appearing convicts him.

  • @mjmitch33 -please stop trying to explain away the fact that the blood collected from the back gate had edta init...the blood evidence that was later collected from the bronce--had edta in it...and the amount was equivilent to the amount missing from the vile--why was ther not more blood--Hell of a coincidence that the amount collected was the roughly the amount missing from the viles and containing edta...dude u gotta let that one go.

  • @bigjbzzl I do not have to explain it for you if you just read the transcripts. IT is all thee in black and white. No one on either side of the isle was ever able to say all the blood was planted and they were never able to say that the amount of EDTA ingredients were enough to mimic that of planted or reference blood. It is in the transcripts. Read them and if you can find anything in any of the testimony that says the EDTA was at that level I would gladly look into it. So educate me...

  • @bigjbzzl I will wait for you to get me transcripts that say Planted levels of EDTA were in the Bronco blood also. You won't find it you are spreading unsubstantiated lies. It is all you have your lies and the lies you say the entire world used to try and frame OJ Simpson one of the whitest bothers in history. Your facts aren't true your reasoning is silly at best and you misstate the facts on a regular basis. I am sure anyone reading this realizes I expose every rumor you have with testimony.

  • @bigjbzzl OK lets stick to the blood evidence at the murder scene that had no traces of EDTA at all. Yep that should convict him.. lol

  • Case should have been thrown out as soon as Johnnie said the words if it doesn't fit you Must acquit. Those are improper instructions to the jury and he should have been objected to and corrected in court. Gloves were in pictures,video and even his own credit card slips his wife bought them remember! Jeesh do people actually think the murderer was the same exact size as him and had his blood,shoes and gloves? Morons!

  • @mjmitch33 Damn there's a lot of lawyers who have said strranger things. There could of been no objection to Johnny's words because it wasn't Improper.

  • @starsfound Actually there could have been a objection as the defense did several times in the prosecutions closing. Any statement that the lawyers use that are outside of evidential material can be objected to as well as any statement that would lead to an a miss understanding of the instructions to the jury. So you are wrong.

  • @mitch 33 No, I'm not wrong there was nothing improper in Johnny's "if it doesn't fit you must acquit " You didn't hear the prosecution object did you? The gloves didn't appear to fit so he informed them they must acquit.

  • @starsfound The gloves had been in storage and needed streachig. Also he wore latex gloves when trying the gloves on,wich will ovbiously affect the fit. Plus do u really think OJ was going to let those gloves appear to fit...lol. The prosicution should never have given him the gloves to try on,it was a dumb idea! The jury was almost entirely black....I think that fact alone secured his freedom!

  • @mjmitch33 --hey moron the gloves didn't fit----the platex gloves had nothing to do with the gloves not fitting....The amount of blood @ the crime scene(s) that was acredited to O.J. was equivalent to the amount missing from the -sample-vile--per F. Lee Bailey---Prosecution did not rebutte this on cross--why?---It was true. Now go to another point because you can't dissproove this one. either way 2 more dead--scrubs--the world is a better place -FREE OJ--U KNOW HE'S GETTIN' OUT THIS YEAR.LOL

  • @bigjbzzl lol you are funny. The gloves were the same size as the ones in the pictures... the gloves were purchased by Nicole receipts were shown in court. FBI and Isotoner designers were brought in to testify that the gloves that were on OJ were the same model and that there were no larger sizes. I dont care if half the blood was planted, the rest was left by OJ leaving with the injured finger that was injured during the murders. The educated world knows that... sorry that leaves you out!

  • @bijbel Ya think, well ya thought wrong. He will not be getting out this year. He has another 5 to 6 before he's even up for parole..Oh but he'll keep trying and get deny after deny, kinda like you in denial of the fact that Simpson is a double murderer

  • @bigjbzzl The gloves "didnt fit" because OJ stopped taking his authritus medication which caused his hands to swell. Oj's ex manager admitted this. It was his idea.

  • @caralarma1 ---So when does your reality series begin. What's that title again...Fishing with Bullshit!!! Please---even mitch the maniac-comes with better lies than that....jheezh!!!

  • Bugliosi also forgets to mention that Fuhrman was trying to get out of LAPD prior to these murders, because he hated Niggers and spicks and he couldnt control himself and thought he would kill one of them. Bugliosi admits Fuhrman is a racist, but didnt plant any evidence. How dumb is this Bugliosi? Fuhrman was somehow involved with these murders, and they all covered for him, including the defense. Fuhrman had motive and opportunity, and provided a false alibi !

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK And the blood? The footprints? The gloves? You are retarded.

  • Bugliosi is talking out of his ass. He said "Fuhrman was a victim because he was awaken in the middle of the night, and his life was destroyed". I got news for you Bugliosi, Fuhrman was wide awake when he was called to the crime scene. Fuhrman was asked, UNDER OATH, for an alibi for the time of the murders. He said he left Laquinta Resort at around 8:00 pm and was home by 10:30pm,(time of the murders) Well, Fuhrman told me he was in Pamona at the time of the murders.I have him on tape!

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK Do you realize you are the only who challenges where Fuhrman was? I will tell you why that is -He was at home asleep when he was called to the crime scene. Do you for one second believe the defense wouldn't of jumped all over this evidence if there were any truth to it? Fuhrman did get a bad rap and has something in common with Simpson--Karma bit both of them in the ass!!

  • @starsfound You havent a clue. Marcia and Johnny both knew Fuhrman was lying. Go watch my video and listen to Fuhrmans voice stating where he was at the time of the murders. He admitted that he was under investigation regarding his where abouts. People like you, when it comes to OJ, are close minded regardless of ANY evidence that points away from OJ. The FBI knows exactly what happened, and it wasnt OJ.

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK Such paranoia! I'm telling you-the only thing the Johnny knew was that Fuhrman was lying about using the N-word in the past. Do you know why people like me,( which is the vast majority of americans) have a closed mind to evidence linking to anyone but Simpson, because it's simply not true. Man you can't tell me the defense and prosecution along with the FBI know it wasn't Oj?. Are you telling me they were all in on a conspiracy to frame him knowing full well it was Fuhrman?

  • @starsfound This entire trial was just a disguise to protect LA from another riot. Also OJ was protecting his family from Joey the Ipp. Go do some research!

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK You need to research the meaning of paranoia. What was Oj doing running from the police with a gun to his head crying to the police" I'm the only one that deserves to get hurt" Why couldn't he explain how he had that deep of a cut to his finger and when it happened? How was the bloody footprint at the crime scene an identical match to the bloody foot print found in the bronco? Why were there fibers from the bronco found on Goldman's dead body?

  • @starsfound WHY WHY WHY? I WOULD DEBATE YOU, BUT YOU REALLY DONT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT REALLY HAPPENED.

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK DEBATE ME COME ON MAN WTF LETS HEAR IT ?? ADDRESS WHAT I FUCKING POINTED OUT TO YOU. DON'T COWARD OFF!!

  • @ROBERTSINNEWYORK FUCK THAT I DON'T HAVE A CLUE ANSWER MY QUESTION

  • Comment removed

  • He's funny-'-Any black that knows me!!!' I am not surprised he said that--but damn sure surprised. No need to go any further....

  • He is just like the rest--calling Furhman a victim--and still not addressing real evidence. edta is not found in normal human blood--but it was found in the blood evidence they found two months later at Nicoles place--it was not discovered at O.J.'s house. And he says he would have 'handled' Johnny---JC would own your tired azz!!!

  • @bigjbzzl your misstating the evidence. EDTA is sometimes available in trace levels of blood. A test was done during the case and trace amounts were found. No where near the level that blood put into a reference tube would have. They proved that in the case that the levels of trace EDTA that was found was thousands times lower than reference blood. You must have missed that. Dont forget the blood was picked up way before OJ was back from Chicago and before his blood was taken. Duh!

  • Then why didn't his office charge Mark Furhman when he took the fifth when asked about the evidence he found? Another well spoken clansmen. gtfoh!!! Monday morning quarterback!!

  • Then why didn't his office charge Mark Furhman when he took the fifth when asked about the evidence he found? Another well spoken clansmen. gtfoh!!!

  • mr bugliosi underestimates the idiocy of that jury--too many racist blacks.

  • anyone who believes that the lapd 'conspired' against oj, is utterly ignorant,and blind, not to mention dumb...

  • OJ still would've been freed, I doubt the blacks jury could even understand Vince.

  • WAIT: Vincent. I think there's 1 reason you couldn't have made Johnnie Cochran slink down beneath his chair. Listen to me closely.

    He was a BETTER LAWYER than you.

  • @MIvarsson99 Johnnie is burning right now in a warm place because god was watching..

  • OJ finally got his though. I hope he is getting it in the back door in prison.

  • ....even today its an example of how a coloured [rich ] man should n,t expect justice done in the American court system !! = ergo = Justice was NOT done !! ..... N,B,S & R,G ... R.I.P.

  • This guy is doing nothing more than monday morning quarterbacking it's easy to make the right call the next morning. If he thinks that he would have gotten a conviction with just one black person on that jury he is living in fantasy land. There were other problems with that case but after Cochran reminded them of what the police, the LAPD for that matter are capable of if given the opportunity especially with cops like fuhrman roaming around the crime scene trying to come up with something, LOL

  • Once Johnny Cochran exposed the LAPD and the racist views of a detective that was involved in the case whom had opportunity to plant evidence the only jury that was going to convict him was an all white one. Black people's encounter with law enforcement is different from a white person so once those black jurors heard testimony about firman he would make stuff up on a black guy just because he was with a white women that's all they needed to cast doubt on every single piece of evidence

  • Wow! What a great group of videos on the OJ case. The nails he wished he could have eaten ended up in the lid of the coffin of justice!

    Clearly millions of people lost total confidence in the justice system that day and has rotted the faith we have traditionally had and should have in the system. All the result of liberal judges beholden to political correctness.

  • VB is *incredibly* entertaining.

  • The title of this interview should have been "If I Prosecuted It"

  • @7beers He did that its a 10 part piece here on you tube

  • Comment removed

  • @jmes047 learn to spell..innocent not inacient! And get real,,OJ got away with murder!

  • Honestly, listening to Bugliosi talk is one of the greatest things ever. He knows what he's talking about better than any other prosecutor.

  • I've done it before, no reason I couldn't do it with Johnny Cochran. Yes!

  • And on Frontline, a lawyer said the jury "was not a black jury" and was not "ignorant."

  • If he meant he could eat his fingernails, then I guess it's not so bad.

  • Best prosecutor. Ever. Period.

  • "i'm so angry geraldo, that i could eat nails"

  • Vince's Nail Sandwhich sounds good

  • They serve it now at subway! nah all kiding aside, Bugliosi would have had the best chance of convicting simpson if he handled the trial.

  • Jesus Christ couldn't have gotten a conviction from that jury.

  • Bugliosi 2012!!

  • I'm so mad Geraldo, I could eat nails

  • "For years blacks have called me bad...meaning good." I would have laughed out loud, but I'm at work. I will watch it again later and laugh out loud.

  • Bugliosi is the man his Reclaiming History would have also convicted Oswald

  • Vince keeps bringing up "it wasn't an aunt of mine in Hibbing, Minnesota," here and in his various books. LOL! It's his personal expression. I believe that he would have ripped Cochran's case to shreds. But he's not interested in convicting people as much as getting at the truth.

  • "That's why I don't care for Tv"...lol

    Seriously, though....this guy would have pwned oj so badly if he was prosecutor.

  • Read his book on this case and you´ll regret your post..

  • Guilty.

  • If this man could put down Charley Manson he could put down O J

  • reraldo..when the BUG is speaking please STFU!

  • fuck! give this guy a half to speak. american tv is so full of shit, porno, poker and other junk; the real issues never get talked about! its all soundbites! even cnn is full o shit! thats why i watch al jazeera english because it has the most in depth interviews.

  • It's very dark blue.

  • I thought the LAPD wore black uniforms.

  • i have no doubt that bugliosi would have gotten that prosecution.

  • Vincent is a genius. That's awesome, he said, I'm so angry, I could eat nails

  • race has nothing to do with it...this is about a MAN who brutally murdered a defensleless woman and he shoudl burn in hell.he is guilty an innocent man has an ALIBI an INNOCENT man isnt abusive to women and TRIES TO RUN FROM THE POLICE.

  • @cbarrett34 If Vince had been the prosecutor, maybe OJ would have been convicted.

  • @7beers If anyone could tell their head from their ass was prosecuting he would've been found guilty.

  • @7beers Johnny Cochran was THE BEST DEFENCE LAWYER OUT THERE, this guy can run his mouth off about what he would have done but any guy can do that in a tv studio! Cochran was a really clever guy!

  • @1THETRUTH10 True, but keep in mind that this guy proved himself to be an excellent prosecutor in the Charles Manson case.

  • @1THETRUTH10 i would say Jerry Spence is the best Defence lawyer

  • @1THETRUTH10 What BIG cases did Johnnie Cochran win. Don't say he got Michael jackson off. Jackson settled his case out of court. Tell us ALL his big cases?

  • @scotsguy77 not sure what the result was but he represented Reginald Denny the truck driver that was assaulted during the L A riots. Bugs is the man

  • @1THETRUTH10 Johnie was immoral and dishonest and god was watching...

  • Time has proven Vincent right.Simpson just a spoiled brat.Good luck with your Nevada trial.O.J.

  • Bugliosi Damn this guy is one hell of a Lawyer..the best.

  • Marcia clark was a extremely weak prosecutor..that fked the case this was a easy conviction ..she fked it up..poor work

  • bugliosi is 1 of the best lawyers ever.

  • Had OJ worked his whole life at Taco Bell he would have been guilty. He bought time.Time got him off the hook.

  • Mr. Bugliosi admits that the prosecution SCREWED UP and he still blames the jury for the not guilty verdict. To say that the issue of race wasnt a issue, is correct. Its the issue of creditbility of that lying peice of crap,FUHRMAN, THATS THE ISSUE! Marcia Clark didnt believe Fuhrman from before the trial even began. I have proof of that! Mark Fuhrman was the key witness in this case, and for the defense not to take issue with Fuhrmans CREDITBILITY, WOULD BE MAL PRACTICE!

  • @joesnewyork but remember what bug said.. fuhrman was also a victim. and the issue of the racial slur he did say bug said should never have been allowed to begin with in the first place.

  • at 07:03 he says that they only have 30 sec. left. That was a looonnnggg 30 sec.

  • MD550---I said it before about you...you don't have to like him, but to call Mr. Bugliosi a dip shit speaks volumes of your lack of knowledge and intelligence!